The invention concerns a method for ink density control.
It is known in ink regulation in offset printing machines that a control step leads to a change of the ink metering element settings. In doing so, the amount of ink that must be transported to the roller train of the offset printer that has thus been changed must be transported over a large number of ink rollers before it reaches the printing plate and sets the desired amount of ink there. This transport time results in a number of printed sheets that are not yet properly inked and must be regarded as spoilage.
A method for use on a half-tone multicolor printer in order to achieve a selected printing result on a printing substrate is disclosed in DE 39 04 301 A1. Measurement values in the form of full-tone densities and/or raster densities are obtained from measurement zones printed on the substrate, and deviations of the instantaneous printing results from the preselected printing result are determined from the measurement values. In order to when necessary bring the instantaneous printing result up to the preselected printing result as quickly as possible, the feed of the printing inks, at least to selected inking zones on the substrate, is initially, for a limited period, changed to a greater extent than corresponds to the measured deviations and only afterward set in correspondence with the deviations.
It is disadvantageous that in spite of the zonal change of the ink feed the changed amount of ink must be transported over the plurality of ink rollers and thus a delay arises in the adjustment of the printed amount of ink.
A method and a device for ink feed is disclosed in DE 102 42 278 A1. The method for ink feed and a corresponding roller train for performing the method operate with an ink fountain roller that has a drive and can be driven at presettable rotary speeds, an ink metering system that interacts with the ink fountain roller, a ductor roller that is subordinate to the ink fountain roller and can be moved back and forth between the ink fountain roller and another ink roller by means of a drive, and a control system, which is signal-connected to the ink metering system, the ink fountain roller drive, and the ductor roller.
For a noticeable acceleration of the reaction time of the roller train, the control system is set into operation when the settings of the ink metering system change. In this case the drive of the ink fountain roller is actuated to a higher rotary speed in a period in which the ductor roller does not contact the ink fountain roller.
It is disadvantageous that a changed amount of ink can be delivered only in specific periods and thus the reaction time of the roller train does not decrease significantly.
An object of the invention is to achieve a faster adjustment of the amount of ink in the roller train in an ink control process and thus to reduce substrate spoilage. Accordingly, according to the invention a highly dynamic ink density control is proposed in which the ink gate opening is increased or decreased above or below the calculated value for a specific period and/or a number of engagements of a ductor roller.
The ink ductor rate of movement and/or the ductor strip width are adjusted to a maximum value or close to the maximum value of 95 to 100%. Through this, the target ink density is achieved much faster than with the known dynamic ink density controls.
The ductor strip width is already changed through the change of the ink ductor rate of movement as long as the engagement time of the ductor roller on the ink fountain roller remains constant. However, the ductor strip can also be adjusted via a change of the engagement time of the ductor roller on the ink fountain roller. Then the adjustment to a maximum value or close to the maximum value of 99 to 100% would also refer to the adjustability of the ductor roller drive with respect to the engagement time.
The invention has the following advantages and avoids the following disadvantages:
a) Faster achievement of the intended ink density
b) The travel path of the ink metering elements is shorter than with traditional dynamic methods.
c) Very large gate openings, which can cause a spray of ink, are avoided.
Ink metering elements 3, which are designed, for example, as linearly movable ink gates, each of which has an actuator, are disposed at the lower end of the ink fountain 2.
A ductor roller 6 that moves back and forth between the ink fountain roller 1 and another ink roller 7 is associated with the ink fountain roller 1. The ductor roller 6 has a drive 8. The length of the ink strip picked up by the ductor roller 6 from the ink fountain roller 1 is dependent on the rotary speed of the ink fountain roller 1 and thus can be adjusted by a rotary speed setting of the drive 4.
The drive 4 of the ink fountain roller 1 communicates with a control system 5 and the control system 5 likewise communicates with the ink metering devices 3 and the drive 8 of the ductor roller 6. Through the connection with the drive 8, the length of the engagement time of the ductor roller 6 on the ink fountain roller 1, and also whether the ductor roller 6 is in contact with the ink fountain roller 1, can be determined by the control system 5. This takes place, for example, via a signal transmitter disposed in drive 8, which detects the back and forth movement of the ductor roller 6.
If the ink feed is dynamically changed over the ink metering elements 3 (i.e., during the printing process with operating ink transport) by an input device such as an ink control system (not shown), which communicates with the control system 5, the control system 5 reacts thereon in accordance with the invention in various ways.
According to one embodiment, for the duration of a dynamic adjustment of the ink metering elements 3, the ink fountain roller 1 is speeded up from the preset speed for the current printing situation to a maximum or substantially maximum speed. Through this, the change of the ink layer on the surface of the ink fountain roller 1 caused by changing the metering elements is dynamically implemented and thus comes into direct contact with the ductor roller 6 faster.
For a given constant engagement time of the ductor roller 6 on the ink fountain roller 1, a longer, so-called ductor strip will be produced. This refers to the rolled-out length of the surface of the ductor roller 6 on the ink fountain roller 1. Therefore, if the metering element opening becomes larger, more printing ink will additionally be transported over the subsequent ink rollers into the roller train by the acceleration of the ink fountain roller 1.
On the other hand, if less printing ink is to be transported and the metering element opening is reduced, an acceleration of the return of printing ink from the upper ink fountain rollers to the ink fountain roller 1 through the acceleration of the ink fountain roller 1 during the reduction of the metering element opening is enabled.
When the dynamic adjustment of the ink metering elements 3 has ended, the drive 4 of the ink fountain roller 1 is controlled so that it returns to the previous rate, i.e. the one selected at the ink fountain roller 1 for the intended printing situation.
According to another embodiment, for the duration of a dynamic adjustment of the ink metering elements 3 via the control system 5, the ductor roller 6 can be adjusted via its drive 8 in its back and forth movement to and from ink fountain roller 1 so that the ductor strip width determined by the engagement time on the ink fountain roller 1 is reset from the value provided for the current printing situation to a maximum or substantially maximum value of the ductor strip width. As a result, the change of the ink layer on the surface of the ink fountain roller 1 caused by changing the metering elements goes directly from the ductor roller 6 to the next roller train roller 7. When the dynamic adjustment of the ink metering elements 3 is ended, the drive 8 of the ductor roller 6 is controlled so that it returns to the previous value of the engagement time, the one selected for the intended printing situation, and thus the ductor strip width on the ductor roller 6 returns to the previous value.
In
It is shown in
In
The adjustment of the speed of the ink fountain roller and the adjustment of the ductor strip width, or the engagement time between the ink fountain roller 1 and the ductor roller 6, can be carried out in combination with each other. In this case the timing of the switching on and off can be coordinated.
However, in any case, the adjustment of the speed of the ink fountain roller 1 and thus the adjustment of the ductor strip width, or the engagement time of the ductor roller 6 on the ink fountain roller 1, can be cancelled after the completion of the dynamic adjustment of the ink metering elements 3.
Then the relevant settings provided for a sufficient ink supply of the roller train preset by an ink control system are set again. Therefore, the ink fountain roller 1 is then again driven at a speed foreseen for the relevant printing situation. Likewise, the ductor roller 6 is again run with a ductor strip width provided for the relevant printing situation.
Basically, it is to be noted that a larger, or longer, ductor strip results from the increase of the speed of the ink fountain roller 1. When a ductor strip width is set on a control panel of a printing machine, a change of the speed of the ink fountain roller is usually undertaken. The ductor strip width and speed of the ink fountain roller are proportional to each other.
In addition, the movement of the ductor roller is usually generated via the main drive of the printing machine, so that it is dependent on its speed. A change of the ductor roller movement per se is relatively complicated. Nevertheless, it can likewise be used to affect the engagement time of the ductor roller on the ink fountain roller by adjusting a ductor roller drive provided for the movement of the ductor roller.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
10 2014 011 865.7 | Aug 2014 | DE | national |
10 2015 101 497.1 | Feb 2015 | DE | national |
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
PCT/EP2015/068274 | 8/7/2015 | WO | 00 |