Highly filled polymeric concentrates

Abstract
A composition comprises a highly filled polymeric concentrate produced by melt processing a filler with a liquid polymeric dispersion.
Description
TECHNICAL FIELD

This disclosure relates to compositions and methods for producing highly filled polymeric concentrates.


BACKGROUND

There is a need in the market for highly filled polymeric concentrates or masterbatches. Today, depending on the type and attributes (e.g., specific gravity, surface area) of the filler, it is difficult to produce polymeric concentrates at levels greater than about 80 weight % or 50 volume % filler using conventional melt processing techniques. Around and above these loading levels the viscosity of the polymeric concentrate becomes too high and can ultimately torque out (viz., stall) the processing equipment. It is also difficult to maintain consistency in the final product when feeding fillers at such loading levels, especially in low bulk density materials. Lastly, the break up and dispersion of additives in the polymeric concentrates becomes more pronounced as the loading level of fillers increases, which can lead to poor performance in the end product.


SUMMARY

We have discovered that, by utilizing liquid polymeric dispersions, we can produce polymeric concentrates at levels greater than 80 wt % or 50 volume % using melt processing techniques. In one non-limiting embodiment, for example, a polymeric concentrate can be made using high speed mixing of an additive with a waterborne polymeric dispersion followed by pelletization using a California pellet mill and/or twin-screw extrusion. The polymeric concentrates described in this disclosure provide significant value to plastics compounders and converters. These polymeric concentrates are easier to handle, more cost effective and more easily dispersed than competitive materials currently on the market.


In one embodiment, a filler is melt processed with a liquid polymeric dispersion, which includes, e.g., a polymer dispersed or dissolved in a liquid carrier. In another embodiment, the liquid dispersion is a waterborne polymeric dispersion. In a preferred embodiment, the waterborne polymeric dispersion is a waterborne polyolefin dispersion. In one embodiment, filler level in the final polymeric concentrate after melt processing is greater than 80 wt % or 50 volume %. In preferred embodiments, the filler level in the final concentrate is greater than 90 wt % or 60 volume %. The polymeric concentrates of this disclosure can be convened into articles using melt processing techniques, such as compounding, extrusion, and molding. Such articles have utility in a variety of markets including automotive, building and construction, consumer and appliance markets.


Using a liquid polymeric dispersion provides a number of advantages. For example, using a liquid polymeric dispersion can lower the overall viscosity of the highly filled polymeric concentrate making it easier to melt process. The liquid polymeric dispersion also effectively and efficiently coats the filler, such that upon removal of the liquid carrier, the polymer remains uniformly coated onto the additive surface. Due to the uniformity of the polymer coating, upon let-down, the polymer begins to flow and causes the additive to disperse, leading to enhanced physical properties in the end product. Finally, the liquid carrier can densify the additive making it possible to achieve higher loadings in the final polymer concentrate.


Using the disclosed liquid polymeric dispersion provides an unexpected way of making highly filled polymeric concentrates. Typically, the presence of liquids (e.g., moisture or solvent) can cause severe issues for melt-extrusion, such as hydrolysis of the polymer or degradation of fillers. Furthermore, because the liquid polymeric dispersion can have a high liquid content greater than 50 wt %, it normally would be difficult to control and efficiently melt process the dispersion. With appropriate processing, however, liquid dispersion can be used to prepare low-cost, highly filled, and well-dispersed polymeric concentrates.


The above summary is not intended to describe each illustrated embodiment or every implementation of the subject matter hereof. The detailed description that follows more particularly exemplifies various illustrative embodiments.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS


FIG. 1 is a scanning electron microscope image at 2000× depicting measurements of calcium carbonate compounds in a polymeric matrix.



FIG. 2 is a scanning electron microscope image at 1000× depicting measurements of talc compounds in a polymeric matrix.





DETAILED DESCRIPTION

Unless the context indicates otherwise the following terms shall have the following meaning and shall be applicable to the singular and plural:


The terms “a,” “an,” “the,” “at least one,” and “one or more” are used interchangeably. Thus, for example, a liquid polymeric dispersion containing “a” polymer means that the liquid polymeric dispersion may include “one or more” polymers.


The term “coupling agent” means an additive that improves the interfacial adhesion between a polymeric matrix and a cellulosic filler.


The term “dispersion” means a material comprising more than one phase where at least one of the phases consists of finely divided phase domains (e.g., solid particles) distributed throughout a continuous phase domain (e.g., a liquid or melt-processed solid).


The term “filler” means a solid, liquid, or gas material added to a polymer during melt processing.


The term “highly filled” means a final polymer concentrate which after melt processing contains greater than 80 wt % or 50 volume % of filler.


The term “liquid polymeric dispersion” means a substance that flows freely and comprises a polymer dispersed or dissolved in a liquid carrier.


The term “melt processable composition” means a formulation that is processed, typically at elevated temperatures near or exceeding the melting point or softening point of at least one component of the formulation, by means of a polymer melt processing technique.


The term “melt processing technique” means a technique for applying thermal and mechanical energy to melt process a polymer or composition, such as compounding, extrusion, injection molding, blow molding, rotomolding, or batch mixing. For purposes of this disclosure, melt processing is differentiated from thermal compression bonding applications.


The terms “polymer” and “polymeric” mean a molecule of high relative molecular mass, the structure of which essentially contains multiple repetitions of units derived, actually or conceptually, from molecules of low relative molecular mass.


The term “polymeric concentrate” means a mixture of a polymeric material and a filler that when melt processed can be formed into a non-friable pellet or agglomerate.


The term “polymeric matrix” means a melt processable, thermoplastic polymeric material or materials.


The terms “preferred” and “preferably” refer to embodiments that may afford certain benefits, under certain circumstances. Other embodiments, however, may also be preferred, under the same or other circumstances. Furthermore, the recitation of one or more preferred embodiments does not imply that other embodiments are not useful, and is not intended to exclude other embodiments from the claimed scope.


The recitation of numerical ranges using endpoints includes all numbers subsumed within that range (e.g. 1 to 5 includes 1, 1.5, 3, 3.95, 4.2, 5, etc.).


This disclosure describes highly filled polymeric concentrates that are easier to handle, more cost effective, and more easily dispersed than competitive materials known in the art. In one embodiment, a filler is melt processed with a liquid polymeric dispersion to make a polymeric concentrate. In another embodiment, the filler level after melt processing in the resulting polymeric concentrate is greater than 80 wt % or greater than 50 volume %. Additional embodiments may have levels in the final concentrate greater than 90 wt % or 60 volume %. The disclosed polymeric concentrates can be converted into articles using compounding, extrusion and molding techniques. These articles have utility in a variety of markets including automotive, building and construction, consumer and appliance markets.


A liquid polymeric dispersion may include one or more polymers that can be delivered in liquid dispersion form. The liquid polymeric dispersion may, for example, contain a solids content of at least about 5 wt %, at least about 10 wt %, at least about 20 wt %, at least about 30 wt %, at least about 40 wt %, at least about 50 wt %, or at least about 70 wt %. In one embodiment, the liquid polymeric dispersion comprises about 30-40 wt % solids. In another embodiment, the liquid polymeric dispersion comprises about 40-50 wt % solids. In another embodiment, the liquid polymeric dispersion comprises about 50 wt % solids.


In one embodiment, the liquid dispersion is a waterborne polymeric dispersion. In another embodiment, the waterborne polymeric dispersion is a waterborne polyolefin dispersion. In one embodiment, the polymer is dispersed in a liquid solvent or oil. Non-limiting examples of liquid solvents or oils include: any organic solvents, mineral or other hydrocarbon based oils, and silicone based oils. In another embodiment, the liquid polymeric dispersion is water-based. In another embodiment, the liquid polymeric dispersion contains a water-in-oil emulsion or an oil-in-water emulsion. In another embodiment, the liquid polymeric dispersion can be made by polymerizing a polymeric precursor (e.g., a salt of hexane-1, 6-diamine and adipic acid) in a liquid carrier.


A wide variety of polymers may be provided in a liquid polymeric dispersion. Non-limiting examples of polymers include high density polyethylene (HDPE), low density polyethylene (LDPE), linear low density polyethylene (LLDPE), functional polyolefin copolymers including polyolefin based ionomers, polypropylene (PP), polyolefin copolymers (e.g., ethylene-butene, ethylene-octene, ethylene vinyl alcohol), polystyrene, polystyrene copolymers (e.g., high impact polystyrene, acrylonitrile butadiene styrene copolymer), polyacrylates, polymethacrylates, polyesters, polyvinylchloride (PVC), fluoropolymers, polyamides, polyether imides, polyphenylene sulfides, polysulfones, polyacetals, polycarbonates, polyphenylene oxides, polyurethanes, thermoplastic elastomers (e.g., SIS, SEBS, SBS), or combinations thereof. In some embodiments, polyolefins are well suited to serve as polymeric matricies for the liquid polymeric dispersion. Non-limiting examples of useful liquid polymeric dispersions include the polyolefin dispersions sold under the HYPOD™ trademark by Dow Chemical or those sold under the Michem™ or Hydrosize™ trademark by Michelman; the waterborne sulfopolyester dispersions sold under the Eastman AQ™ trademark by Eastman Chemical; or a salt of hexane-1, 6-diamine and adipic acid (AH Salt), diluted with water to form a waterborne polymeric dispersion, sold by Ascend Performance.


A liquid polymeric dispersion can be melt processed with one or more polymers. Non-limiting examples of such polymers include high density polyethylene (HDPE), low density polyethylene (LDPE), linear low density polyethylene (LLDPE), functional polyolefin copolymers including polyolefin based ionomers, polypropylene (PP), polyolefin copolymers (e.g., ethylene-butene, ethylene-octene, ethylene vinyl alcohol), polystyrene, polystyrene copolymers (e.g., high impact polystyrene, acrylonitrile butadiene styrene copolymer), polyacrylates, polymethacrylates, polyesters, polyvinylchloride (PVC), fluoropolymers, polyamides, polyether imides, polyphenylene sulfides, polysulfones, polyacetals, polycarbonates, polyphenylene oxides, polyurethanes, thermoplastic elastomers (e.g., SIS, SEBS, SBS), or combinations thereof.


A liquid polymeric dispersion can be melt processed with one or more fillers. Fillers are useful in that they allow one skilled in the art to adjust physical and thermal properties of the end use article made using a polymeric material. For example, fillers can improve physical and thermal properties of end use articles. Some fillers can also be utilized to reduce the coefficient of thermal expansion (CTE) of a polymeric article. Non-limiting examples of fillers include mineral and organic fillers including carbonates, silicates, talc, mica, wollastonite, clay, silica, alumina, carbon fiber, carbon black, carbon nanotubes, graphite, graphene, volcanic ash, expanded volcanic ash, perlite, glass fiber, solid glass microspheres, hollow glass microspheres, cenospheres, ceramics, and conventional cellulosic materials including: wood flour, wood fibers, sawdust, wood shavings, newsprint, paper, flax, hemp, wheat straw, rice hulls, kenaf, jute, sisal, peanut shells, soy hulls, or any cellulose containing material. The amount of filler in the polymeric concentrate after melt processing is greater than 80 wt % or 50 volume %. In some embodiments, the amount of filler by volume may exceed 70% or even 80%.


In another embodiment, a liquid polymeric dispersion is melt processed with a lightweight filler to form a lightweight highly filled polymeric concentrate. Non-limiting examples of lightweight fillers include: hollow glass microspheres, cenospheres, perlite and expanded volcanic ash. Preferred lightweight fillers include hollow glass microspheres and expanded volcanic ash. In another embodiment, a more dense filler is combined with the lightweight filler and the liquid polymeric dispersion to form a lightweight highly filled polymeric concentrate. In another embodiment, a liquid polymeric dispersion is melt processed with a powdered polymer to form a highly filled polymeric system. A non-limiting example of a preferred powdered polymer includes, but is not limited to, polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE).


In another embodiment, the polymeric matrix may contain other additives. Non-limiting examples of such other additives include antioxidants, light stabilizers, blowing agents, foaming additives, antiblocking agents, heat stabilizers, impact modifiers, biocides, antimicrobial additives, compatibilizers, plasticizers, tackifiers, processing aids, lubricants, coupling agents, flame retardants, oxygen scavengers, and colorants. The additives may be incorporated into the melt processable composition in the form of powders, pellets, granules, or in any other form that can survive extrusion. The amount and type of conventional additives in the melt processable composition may vary depending upon the polymeric matrix and the desired physical properties of the finished composition. Based on this disclosure, those skilled in the art of melt processing will be capable of selecting appropriate amounts and types of additives to match with a specific polymeric matrix in order to achieve desired physical properties of the finished material.


Additives well suited for melt processing with the polymeric dispersion of this disclosure include coupling agents. Coupling agents can assist in the interfacial adhesion or other attraction between a filler or other additive and the polymeric matrix. Non-limiting examples of coupling agents include silanes, zirconates, titanates and functionalized polymers. Preferred coupling agents included silane and maleic anhydride grafted polymers. Non-limiting examples of maleic anhydride grafted polymers include those sold under the trademarks Polybond™ (Addivant), Extinity™ (NWP), Integrate™ (Lyondell Basell), and Fusabond™ (DuPont). Typical loading levels of coupling agents and antioxidants are approximately 0.1 to 5 wt % of the final polymeric concentrate formulation.


The highly filled polymeric concentrate composition and optional additives can be prepared by blending the filler and the optional additives into a liquid polymeric dispersion. Depending on the type and nature of polymeric matrix, this can be done using a variety of mixing processes that will be familiar to those skilled in the art. The liquid polymeric dispersion and filler can be combined together by any suitable equipment available in the plastics industry, such as with a compounding mill, a Banbury mixer, or a mixing extruder. In one embodiment, a vented twin screw extruder is utilized. The materials may be injected or supplied to the extruder at various insertion points such as the throat or at downstream ports in the extruder. The materials may be used in the form, for example, of a powder, a pellet, or a granular product. The mixing operation is most conveniently carried out at a temperature above the melting point or softening point of the polymer.


In another embodiment, the highly filled polymeric concentrate composition and optional additives can be prepared by blending the filler and optional additives into a liquid polymeric dispersion and processing directly in a pellet mill or densifier to form the highly filled polymeric concentrate.


The minimum temperature during melt processing is typically above the temperature required to volatilize the liquid carrier in the dispersion. For example, if the liquid carrier is water, the temperature should be greater than 100° C. during melt processing. The volatilized liquid carrier can be vented or pulled away (e.g., using a vacuum) from the melt processing unit. The resulting melt processed filled concentrate can be either pelletized directly into a pellet, agglomerate or granulate form or fed from the melt processing equipment into a secondary operation to pelletize the composition (e.g., a pellet mill or densifier) into a densified pellet, agglomerate or granulate. The densified pellet, agglomerate or granulate of this disclosure preferably has enough integrity such that it can be readily used in a subsequent compounding, extrusion or molding step (viz., without breaking up into a fine particulate during transport, conveying or feeding).


Melt-processing of the liquid polymeric dispersion and filler are typically performed at a temperature from 800 to 300° C., although other optimum operating temperatures are selected depending upon the carrier boiling point(s) and the melting point, melt viscosity, and thermal stability of the polymer(s). A variety of melt processing devices, e.g., extruders, may be used to process the melt processable compositions of this disclosure.


The highly filled polymeric concentrates of this disclosure have broad utility in the automotive, building and construction, consumer and appliance. Non-limiting examples of potential uses for such concentrates include automotive components, decking, fencing, railing, roofing, siding, containers and appliance housings.


The polymeric concentrates described herein provide significant value to plastics compounders and converters. These polymeric concentrates are easier to handle, more cost effective and more easily dispersed than competitive materials currently on the market.


In the following examples, all parts and percentages are by weight unless otherwise indicated.


Examples








TABLE 1







MATERIALS








Material
Supplier





LPD
Liquid Polymeric Dispersion, HYPOD 1001, waterborne PE



copolymer, 40-44 wt % solids, commercially available from



Dow Chemical (Midland, MI)


LPD 2
Liquid Polymeric Dispersion, AQ 55S, waterborne



sulfopolyester, 30-33 wt % solids, commercially available



from Eastman Chemical (Kingsport, TN)


LPD 3
Liquid Polymeric Dispersion, a salt of hexane-1, 6-diamine



and adipic acid (AH Salt), diluted with water to form a



waterborne dispersion at 50 wt % solids, commercially



available from Ascend Performance Materials (Houston, TX)


PP
Bapolene 4012F, 12 MFI polypropylene flake resin,



commercially available from Bamberger Polymers (Jericho, NY)


HDPE
Ineos T50-440-119 HDPE, commercially available from



Bamberger Polymers Inc., (Jericho, NY)


PET
PET, commercially available from Valley Industrial


Nylon
N66 UF NC PEL Nylon 6,6 commercially available from Jeda



Compounding and Distribution Services


Talc 1
Silverline 303 talc, commercially available from Imerys, Inc,



(San Jose, CA)


Talc 2
HAR Talc, commercially available from Imerys, Inc, San Jose,



CA


CaCO3
GLC 1012 calcium carbonate, commercially available from



Great Lakes Calcium Inc., (Green Bay, WI)


Clay
Closite 15A clay, commercially available from BYK Inc.,



(Wesel, Germany)


Wood
40 mesh Maple, commercially available from American Wood



Fibers, (Schoefield, WI)


MS
S60HS, hollow glass microspheres, commercially available



from 3M (St. Paul, MN)
















TABLE 2







EXPERIMENTAL MASTERBATCH (MB) CONCENTRATE FORMULATIONS































Volume %


Example
LPD
LPD 2
LDP 3
PP
Talc 1
Talc 2
CaCO3
Clay
MS
Wood
Weight % Filler
Filler






















MB1
10



90





95.8
89.3


MB2
15



85





93.5
84.0


MB3
5





95



98.0
94.4


MB4
10





90



95.8
89.3


MB5
15





85



93.5
84.0


MB6
5






95


98.0
96.7


MB7
10






90


95.8
93.4


MB8
15






85


93.5
89.1


MB9
20








80
90.9
87.0


MB10
15


40




45

50
83.3


MB11
20



60



20

90.9
8.74


MB12

20




80



92.2
88.8


MB13


20


80




90.4
79.5
















TABLE 3







EXPERIMENTAL COMPOUND FORMULATIONS AND COMPARATIVE EXAMPLES (CE)























Example
HDPE
PET
Nylon
MB1
MB2
MB3
MB4
MB5
MB6
MB7
MB8
MB12
MB13
Talc
CaCO3
Clay


























1
68.5


31.5














2
66.25



33.75













3
69.25




30.75












4
68.5





31.5











5
66.25






33.75










6
69.25







30.75









7
68.5








31.5








8
66.25









33.75







9

80









20






10 


80









20





CE1
70












30




CE2
70













30



CE3
70














30









Sample Preparation

For MB1-MB9 and MB13, the filler and liquid polymeric dispersion was blended in a plastic bag and gravimetrically fed into a 27 mm twin screw extruder (52:1 L:D, commercially available from Entek Extruders, Lebanon, Oreg.). The compounding was performed using the following temperature profile in zones 1-13: 100, 350, 400, 400, 400, 400, 400, 400, 400, 400, 400, 400, and 400 degrees Fahrenheit (about 38, 177, 204, 204, 204, 204, 204, 204, 204, 204, 204, 204, and 204 degrees Celsius, respectively). The material was run though the extruder with the die removed and collected as a dry particulate. The dry particulate was run through an electric 5″ (approximately 13 cm) pellet mill (commercially available from Pellet Masters, Chippewa Falls, Wis.) to densify the material. The filler masterbatches were subsequently let-down into a thermoplastic matrix. For MB 10-12, the fillers and liquid polymeric dispersion were blended in a plastic bag and directly pelletized in a 5″ (approximately 13 cm) electric pellet mill (commercially available from Pellet Masters, Chippewa Falls, Wis.).


For the experimental compound formulations 1-8, the HDPE, MBs, talc, calcium carbonate, and clay were dry blended in a plastic bag and gravimetrically fed into a 27 mm twin screw extruder (52:1 L:D, commercially available from Entek Extruders, Lebanon, Oreg.). Comparative Examples CE1-CE3 demonstrate properties for directly compounded mineral filled HDPE compounds. The compounding for formulations 1-8 and CE1-CE3 was performed using the following temperature profile in zones 1-13: 100, 350, 400, 400, 400, 400, 400, 400, 400, 400, 400, 400, and 400 degrees Fahrenheit (about 38, 177, 204, 204, 204, 204, 204, 204, 204, 204, 204, 204, and 204 degrees Celsius, respectively). The compounds were extruded into strands and pelletized into pellets approximately 1-2 mm in length. The resulting compounds were injection molded into test specimens and characterized based on ASTM D790-07 and ASTM D638-00. ASTM D790-07 provides a standardized method for testing the flexural properties, such as flexural modulus and strength, for unreinforced and reinforced plastics. ASTM D638-00 provides a standardized method for testing the tensile properties of plastics, including tensile modulus, tensile strength and elongation. Specific Gravity was determined using the Archimedes Method. Impact testing was performed based on ASTM D256-10. The results of this testing are shown in Table 4 below.









TABLE 4







EXPERIMENTAL RESULTS





















Izod



Flexural
Flexural
Specific
Tensile
Tensile
Elongation
Impact



Modulus
Strength
Gravity
Modulus
Strength
at
Unnotched


Example
(kpsi)
(kpsi)
(g/cm3)
(kpsi)
(kpsi)
Break (%)
(ft-lbs/in)





1
202
4.7
1.17
289
3.2
4.9
4.22


2
197
4.7
1.17
289
3.1
4.0
4.20


3
199
4.4
1.17
238
2.8
5.6
5.73


4
261
4.2
1.16
233
2.8
5.8
6.18


5
259
4.3
1.17
234
3.0
4.4
4.65


6
252
4.0
1.06
297
2.4
2.0
1.22


7
253
3.8
1.05
323
2.2
1.9
1.27


8
236
3.7
1.06
286
2.1
2.0
1.15


CE1
194
4.2
1.16
241
2.9
5.1
6.25


CE2
250
4.6
1.17
282
3.3
5.0
4.35


CE3
264
4.4
1.06
328
2.5
1.3
1.15









Experimental compound formulations 1-8 demonstrate the physical properties of the let-down compounds of this disclosure. They compare favorably to the mechanical properties of the materials directly compounded into virgin HPDE at the same filler loading. For example, Example 1 and CE1 have the same filler loading level, but formulation 1 was processed with MB1 whereas CE1 was made by directly feeding in HDPE with talc filler. Formulation 4 and CE2 and Formulation 7 and CE3 have the same filler loading but with calcium carbonate and clay, respectively. These results show that the physical performance for products obtained by letting down the MB formulations is at least as goof if not better than that obtained by direct feeding of the filler with virgin resin are roughly the same. This signifies that the additives in the MBs may undergo improved dispersion during the let-down, thereby enhancing the physical properties of the end compound. Ultimately, although the MB formulations have volume percentages greater than 50, one can still disperse the MB formulation upon let-down in a final polymer compound.


For experimental compound formulations 9 and 10 containing MB 12 and 13, respectively, scanning electron microscopy (SEM) images were taken to examine dispersion quality and particle size, as shown in FIGS. 1 and 2. FIG. 1 is an SEM image at 2000× of calcium carbonate compound measurements 12a, 12b, 12c, 12d, 12e, 12f, and 12g in 80/20 wt % PET polymeric matrix 10. FIG. 2 is an SEM image at 1000× of talc compound measurements 22a, 22b, 22c, 22d, 22e, 22f, 22g, 22h, 22i, 22j, and 22k in 80/20 wt % nylon 6,6 polymeric matrix 20. As shown in FIGS. 1 and 2, MB 12 and 13 can be successfully let-down in PET and nylon 6, 6, respectively. This is evident because the measured particle size of the additives, carbonate compounds 12 in FIG. 1 and talc compounds 22 in FIG. 2, are similar to the reported size of the respective additives. Furthermore, in both FIGS. 1 and 2, the additives also appear evenly distributed throughout the polymer matrix, demonstrating the efficacy of the liquid polymeric dispersion.


Although specific embodiments have been illustrated and described herein for purposes of description of the preferred embodiments, it will be appreciated by those of ordinary skill in the art that a wide variety of alternate or equivalent implementations calculated to achieve the same purposes may be substituted for the specific embodiments shown and described without departing from the scope of the disclosure. This application is intended to cover any adaptations or variations of the preferred embodiments discussed herein.

Claims
  • 1. A highly filled polymeric concentrate comprising: one or more polymeric phases; andone or more fillers dispersed throughout the one or more polymeric phases of the highly filled polymeric concentrate using a liquid polymeric dispersion;wherein the highly filled polymeric concentrate has at least 60% by volume of the one or more fillers.
  • 2. The highly filled polymeric concentrate of claim 1, wherein the highly filled polymeric concentrate has at least 70% by volume of the one or more fillers.
  • 3. The highly filled polymeric concentrate of claim 1, wherein the highly filled polymeric concentrate has at least 80% by volume of the one or more fillers.
  • 4. The highly filled polymeric concentrate of claim 1, wherein the highly filled polymeric concentrate has at least 90% by volume of the one or more fillers.
  • 5. The highly filled polymeric concentrate of claim 1, further comprising a compatibilizer, coupling agent, or combination thereof.
  • 6. The highly filled polymeric concentrate of claim 1, wherein the highly filled polymeric concentrate is produced by using a pellet mill or high speed mixer.
  • 7. The highly filled polymeric concentrate of claim 1, wherein the one or more fillers includes carbon fiber, carbon nanotubes, conductive carbon, carbon black, or combination thereof.
  • 8. A highly filled polymeric concentrate comprising: one or more polymeric phases;one or more fillers dispersed throughout the one or more polymeric phases of the highly filled polymeric concentrate by melt processing a liquid polymeric dispersion;wherein the highly filled polymeric concentrate has at least 80% by weight of the one or more fillers.
  • 9. The highly filled polymeric concentrate of claim 8, wherein the highly filled polymeric concentrate has at least 90% by weight of the one or more fillers.
  • 10. The highly filled polymeric concentrate of claim 8, wherein the highly filled polymeric concentrate has at least 93% by weight of the one or more fillers.
  • 11. The highly filled polymeric concentrate of claim 8, wherein the highly filled polymeric concentrate has at least 95% by weight of the one or more fillers.
  • 12. The highly filled polymeric concentrate of claim 8, further comprising a compatibilizer, coupling agent, or combination thereof.
  • 13. The highly filled polymeric concentrate of claim 8, wherein the highly filled polymeric concentrate is produced by using a pellet mill or high speed mixer.
  • 14. The highly filled polymeric concentrate of claim 8, wherein the one or more fillers includes carbon fiber, carbon nanotubes, conductive carbon, carbon black, or combination thereof.
  • 15. A highly filled polymeric concentrate comprising: one or more polymeric phases; andone or more fillers selected from a group consisting of carbon fiber, carbon nanotube, conductive carbon, and carbon black;wherein the one or more fillers are dispersed through the one or more polymeric phases of the highly filled polymeric concentrate by melt processing a liquid polymeric dispersion; andwherein the highly filled polymeric concentrate has at least 50% by volume of the one or more fillers.
  • 16. The highly filled polymeric concentrate of claim 15, wherein the highly filled polymeric concentrate has at least 60% by volume of the one or more fillers.
  • 17. The highly filled polymeric concentrate of claim 15, wherein the highly filled polymeric concentrate has at least 70% by volume of the one or more fillers.
  • 18. The highly filled polymeric concentrate of claim 15, wherein the highly filled polymeric concentrate has at least 80% by volume of the one or more fillers.
  • 19. The highly filled polymeric concentrate of claim 15, wherein the highly filled polymeric concentrate is produced by using a pellet mill or high speed mixer.
  • 20. The highly filled polymeric concentrate of claim 15, further comprising a compatibilizer, coupling agent, or combination thereof.
CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS

This application is a continuation of application Ser. No. 15/571,454 filed Nov. 2, 2017, which is a National Phase entry of PCT Application No. PCT/US2017/019420, filed Feb. 24, 2017, which claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Application No. 62/299,858, filed Feb. 25, 2016 and U.S. Provisional Application No. 62/346,154, filed Jun. 6, 2016, each of which is hereby fully incorporated herein by reference.

US Referenced Citations (91)
Number Name Date Kind
2371868 Berg et al. Mar 1945 A
3668179 Di Biasi et al. Jun 1972 A
3684645 Temple et al. Aug 1972 A
3717499 McClure Feb 1973 A
4164526 Clay et al. Aug 1979 A
4248931 Salman Feb 1981 A
4547421 Dunbar Oct 1985 A
4582756 Niinuma et al. Apr 1986 A
4616042 Avakian Oct 1986 A
4767580 Shingo et al. Aug 1988 A
4793956 Nogiwa et al. Dec 1988 A
4878970 Schubert et al. Nov 1989 A
5118163 Batson et al. Jun 1992 A
5118532 Batson et al. Jun 1992 A
5219163 Watson Jun 1993 A
5238622 Grimmer Aug 1993 A
5351895 Brooks et al. Oct 1994 A
5364412 Furukawa Nov 1994 A
5827460 Brentrup et al. Oct 1998 A
5965232 Vinod Oct 1999 A
5973049 Bieser et al. Oct 1999 A
6017991 Drummond et al. Jan 2000 A
6068715 Yokokita et al. May 2000 A
6153674 Landin Nov 2000 A
6231650 Mallow et al. May 2001 B1
6271270 Muzzy Aug 2001 B1
6316075 Desai et al. Nov 2001 B1
6387967 Muzzy May 2002 B2
6572697 Gleeson et al. Jun 2003 B2
6620487 Tonyan et al. Sep 2003 B1
6743742 LaRocco et al. Jun 2004 B1
6872246 Muller et al. Mar 2005 B2
6907708 Merkley et al. Mar 2005 B2
6861128 Naji et al. Jun 2005 B1
7081300 Laurence et al. Jul 2006 B2
7241818 Hemmings et al. Jul 2007 B2
7361401 Desai et al. Apr 2008 B2
7455793 Hsu et al. Nov 2008 B2
7455798 Datta et al. Nov 2008 B2
7470488 Lee et al. Dec 2008 B2
7763345 Chen et al. Jul 2010 B2
8106105 Cernohous Jan 2012 B2
8431054 Pervan et al. Apr 2013 B2
10414911 Cernohous et al. Sep 2019 B2
10479057 Bennett et al. Nov 2019 B2
10501945 Cernohous et al. Dec 2019 B2
10543626 Bennett et al. Jan 2020 B2
20010028127 Hinds et al. Oct 2001 A1
20020025414 Desai et al. Feb 2002 A1
20020031653 Ricciardelli et al. Mar 2002 A1
20050020747 Symons Jan 2005 A1
20050124763 Mikami et al. Jun 2005 A1
20050166513 Vanderhoef Aug 2005 A1
20050022303 Cernohous Oct 2005 A1
20060019078 Osten et al. Jan 2006 A1
20060142455 Agarwal et al. Jun 2006 A1
20060173105 Griffin et al. Aug 2006 A1
20070020747 Sigowrth et al. Feb 2007 A1
20070027234 Sigworth et al. Feb 2007 A1
20070072961 Ma et al. Mar 2007 A1
20070155859 Song et al. Jul 2007 A1
20080001429 Willis Jan 2008 A1
20080187739 Baker et al. Aug 2008 A1
20080207831 Feinberg Aug 2008 A1
20080287576 Nichols et al. Nov 2008 A1
20090020914 Nelson et al. Jan 2009 A1
20100010141 Nakamura et al. Jan 2010 A1
20100016459 Cernohous Jan 2010 A1
20100030003 Pervan et al. Dec 2010 A1
20110086956 Boscia et al. Apr 2011 A1
20110177308 Anderson et al. Jul 2011 A1
20110272860 Walia Nov 2011 A1
20120059074 Adkinson et al. Mar 2012 A1
20120070646 Ha et al. Mar 2012 A1
20120088072 Pawloski et al. Apr 2012 A1
20120135203 Albert et al. May 2012 A1
20120208933 Hamilton et al. Aug 2012 A1
20120237606 Wellings Sep 2012 A1
20130147090 Schromm et al. Jun 2013 A1
20130189511 Cernohous et al. Jul 2013 A1
20130206035 Hamilton et al. Aug 2013 A1
20130207302 Cernohous et al. Aug 2013 A1
20140005307 Cernohous et al. Jan 2014 A1
20150065974 Michiels et al. Mar 2015 A1
20150152650 Cernohous et al. Jun 2015 A1
20150315377 Mehta et al. Nov 2015 A1
20160083619 Anderson et al. Mar 2016 A1
20160369516 Cappelle Dec 2016 A1
20180178420 Bennett et al. Jun 2018 A1
20180297245 Cernohous Oct 2018 A1
20190330455 Cernohous et al. Oct 2019 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (34)
Number Date Country
102432959 May 2012 CN
103153609 Jun 2013 CN
0651003 May 1995 EP
0794214 Sep 1997 EP
2339092 Jun 2011 EP
2754688 Jul 2014 EP
49109464 Oct 1974 JP
51009878 Aug 1976 JP
04236246 Aug 1992 JP
H6-508567 Sep 1994 JP
2002322810 Aug 2002 JP
2003238223 Aug 2003 JP
2004292653 Oct 2004 JP
2005082802 Mar 2005 JP
2007031706 Feb 2007 JP
2013234255 Nov 2013 JP
1020020071203 Sep 2002 KR
1020020071204 Mar 2004 KR
1775425 Nov 1992 SU
WO971114 Mar 1997 WO
WO 9935182 Jul 1999 WO
WO2001098064 Dec 2001 WO
WO2002015299 Feb 2002 WO
WO2006123993 Nov 2006 WO
WO 2007102825 Sep 2007 WO
WO 2008094529 Aug 2008 WO
WO 2009134403 Nov 2009 WO
WO 2012001091 Jan 2012 WO
WO 2012016916 Feb 2012 WO
WO 2013179260 Dec 2013 WO
WO 2013181379 Dec 2013 WO
WO 2014207308 Dec 2014 WO
WO2016022103 Feb 2016 WO
WO 2016115556 Jul 2016 WO
Non-Patent Literature Citations (32)
Entry
“ASTM E831-14: Standard Test Methos for Linear Thermal Expansion of Solid Materials by Thermodynamical Analysis,” Aug. 1, 2014.
“Polyvinyl Chloride (PVC) Typical Properties Generic PVC, Rigid | UL Prospector,” Jan. 6, 2015, XP055502548, Retrieved from the Internet: URL: https://web.archive.org/web/20150106145449/http://plastics.ulprospector.com:80/generics/46/c/t/polyvinyl-chloride-pvc-properties-processing/sp/8/ [retrieved on Aug. 28, 2018].
“Composite Solutions, Reinforcement Guide: Transforming the World with Advanced Solutions,” Mar. 1, 2011, XP 055508480, Toledo, Ohio, 43659; Retrieved from the Internet: <URL:http://www.ocvreinforcements.com/pdf/library/Composite_Solutions_Guide_100360_Efinalprintable.pdf>[retrieved on Sep. 20, 2018].
Application and File History for U.S. Appl. No. 12/823,819, filed Jul 20, 2009 inventor Cernohous.
Application and File History for U.S. Appl. No. 14/404,544, filed Nov. 28, 2014, inventors Cernohous et al.
Application and File History for U.S. Appl. No. 14/555,930, filed Nov. 28, 2014, inventors Cernohous et al.
Application and File History for U.S. Appl. No. 15/575,758, filed Nov. 20, 2017, inventors Bennett et al.
Application and File History for U.S. Appl. No. 15/571,454, filed Nov. 2, 2017 inventors Cernohous et al.
Chinese Office Action for Application No. 201380027887.7, dated Jan. 29, 2016.
Chinese Office Action for Chinese Application No. 201680041873.4 dated Jan. 11, 2019.
Chinese Second Office Action for Chinese Application No. 201680041873.4 dated Sep. 19, 2019.
English translation of Decision of Refusal for Japanese Application No. 2015-515185 dated Jan. 25, 2018.
English translation of Notice of Reasons for Rejection for Japanese Application No. 2015-515185 dated Jun. 18, 2019.
EP Communication for Application No. 13 796 809.5pursuant to Article 94(3) EPC, dated Aug. 17, 2017.
European Extended Search Report for European Application No. 17757329.2 dated Sep. 20, 2019.
Extended European Search Report for Application No. 13 796 809.5, dated Dec. 16, 2015
Extended European Search Report for Application No. 16797376.7, dated Dec. 7, 2018.
Extended European Search Report for European Application No. 16738034.4, dated Sep. 28, 2018.
International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/US2013/043342, dated Aug. 27. 2013.
Partial supplementary European search report for Application No. 16797376,7, dated Sep. 5, 2018.
Second Chinese Office Action for Application No. 201380027887.7, dated Nov. 23, 2016.
Supplementary European Search Report, Application No. 13 796 809.5, dated Dec. 8, 2015.
International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/US2016/56067, dated Dec. 23, 2016.
International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/US2017/019420 dated Jun. 2, 2017.
International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/US2017/057381 dated Jan. 17, 2018.
International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/US2016/033516, dated Aug. 17, 2016.
International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/US2017/013797, dated Jul. 1, 2016.
Liu et al., “Synergistic flame retardant effects between hollow glass microspheres and magnesium hydroxide in ethylene-vinyl acetate composites”, Polymer Degradation and Stability, vol. 104, Apr. 1, 2014., pp. 87-94.
Naranjo C. et al., “Thermal Properties” in Plastics Testting and Characterization, Industrial Applications, Nov. 1, 2012, Hanser Fachbuchverlag, Munchen, XP 055508349, ISBN: 978-3-446-41315-3, Title page, pp. 88-94, and Abstract.
Application and File History for U.S. Appl. No. 15/552,092, filed Aug. 18, 2017, inventors Bennett et al.
English translation of Chinese Office Action dated Dec. 27, 2019 for Chinese Application No. 201680014629.9.
European Communication (Summons to attend oral proceedings) for European Application No. 13796809.5 dated Feb. 4, 2020.
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20190330455 A1 Oct 2019 US
Provisional Applications (2)
Number Date Country
62299858 Feb 2016 US
62346154 Jun 2016 US
Continuations (1)
Number Date Country
Parent 15571454 US
Child 16460287 US