Patent Application
20240182688
The present invention relates to a process for the manufacturing of bio-based aerogels derived from crystalline cellulose extracted from plants' fiber waste, also known as fiber residues, and bio-based aerogels by said process.
Hemp is an industrial plant which is grown globally under restrictive laws and regulations (Pargar et al., 2020). This crop is mainly cultivated for its seed and fiber production and is defined by its very low amounts of psychoactive cannabinoid, having as low as 0.3% of THC. In Canada, the legalization of hemp cultivation dates back to the 1998 and is regulated by Health Canada as per Bill C45 (Pargar et al., 2020). Based on published numbers from Health Canada, a total of 77,800 acers of industrial hemp were planted in 2018. In Europe, hemp crops are grown for fiber production, but the current drivers for Canadian hemp production are the high demands for hemp grain (seed, and oil) which serve as a valuable food resource.
Although in Canada hemp is manly cultivated for its grain and oil production, hemp fibers are gaining more interest among the industrial sections. Hemp bast fibers have distinctive properties when compared to other bast fibres (e.g. kenaf, jute, flax or ramie). The fibers are characterized by their outstanding durability, absorbency, length, and anti-mildew and antimicrobial properties (Alberta Agriculture and Forestry, 2017, March). Some of the features such as fiber length, color, and fineness can highly influence the farm-gate price.
In addition, the plant's maturity stage, condition of retting, and quality of storage are all factors that affects the yield of straw, hence the cost returns per hectare (Ontario Ministry of Agriculture Food and Rural Affairs, 2009, August). It is worth mentioning that the best fiber's quality can be obtained from hemp varieties that are grown for fiber production and are not allowed to produce seeds, and these plants are usually not considered as dual purpose hemp crops (Canadian Hemp Trade Alliance, 2020b).
On a microscale level, cross sectional area of hemp stem contains both primary and secondary bast fiber (also called phloem fibers) bundles which are made up of 70-74% of cellulose, 15-20% hemicellulose, 3.5-5.7% lignin, 0.8% pectin, and 1.2-6.2% wax (Ranalli & Venturi, 2004; Sen & Reddy, 2011). The secondary produced fibers are short and highly lignified which renders them less desirable for most applications (Placet et al., 2014). A hemp plant is made up of 3 major parts: bast fiber making up 30%, hurd part making up 60%, and the chaff part making up 10% of the plant (Canadian Hemp Trade Alliance, 2020b). Following the harvesting process, a procedure called decortication of the straw can be applied for the separation of the straw's constituents. This process results in two major types of fibers called hurd and bast. Both of these resulting fibers can be used in a wide range of applications (Canadian Hemp Trade Alliance, 2020a).
This inner wood-like core fibers can be directed to “low end uses”, these include hemp concrete. On the other hand, the outer bast fibers can be used for better paying and technical markets (Canadian Hemp Trade Alliance, 2020b).
Canadian hemp producers are faced with major challenges associated with hemp production, which is biomass and residues disposal generated post-harvest of the plant. When it comes to medical cannabis the leaves, flowers and seeds are of great interest to the producers and the remaining vegetation is considered as plant residues. While, oil and grain producing hemp residues can be defined as the hemp stalk without flowers, seeds or leaves and is currently being disposed in landfills and accounts for large dry matter yield (about 10 tons per ha) (Alberta Agriculture and Forestry, 2017, March). Hemp vegetative biomass offers valuable components such as: fiber (the outer core) and accounts for 25-30% of the stalk, hurd (the inner part of the stalk) and dust (Alberta Agriculture and Forestry, 2017, March). To better understand the worth of plant residues or biowaste, hemp grown in two cites in Alberta, Canada were assessed for their physic-chemical properties. The cellulose content in the bast component of hemp stalk ranged between 57-65%, while the core (wood-like part) had 48% cellulose. Additionally, published numbers by the government of Alberta states that the total yield of hemp bast fibers is 2,697 kg/ha, and hemp core components is 5,543 kg/ha. Harnessing these plant residues can serve as a raw starting material for the curation of the most abundant biopolymer, cellulose (Alberta Agriculture and Forestry, 2017, March). The worldwide increase of hemp production is on the rise, and alternative solutions must come into play to ensure sustainable waste management.
When it comes to the current levels of production, hemp fibers are still not economically valuable as other residual fibers such as wood (or hurd) and straw, that are used in fiberboards and biofuels, respectively. Rather, their value can be recognized in modern manufacturing of products that require specific fiber properties and quality such as reinforced composites, therefore replacing fiber glass in these applications (Canadian Hemp Trade Alliance, 2020b). We are currently proposing a novel approach to convert the hemp short fiber residues to cellulose aerogels, with excellent mechanical properties and defined physical and chemical characteristics.
According to the flax council of Canada, the flax industry contributes annually an approximate of $300 million to the Canadian economy (Northen Alberta Development Council, 2017, July). When it comes to overall flax production across Canada, Alberta produces only about 9% of Canadian flax, and 93% of Alberta's flax product gets exported to Belgium, U.S.A., and China. Other emerging markets for Canadian flax are Korea, Germany and the Netherlands (Northen Alberta Development Council, 2017, July). According to the Saskatchewan Flax Development Commission, Canada is the world's largest producer and exporter of flax with annual exports valued at $150-180 million. As a result, market conditions in Canada have a significant impact on global flax prices (Saskatchewan Flax Development Commission, 2020a). It is worth mentioning that linseed or oil flax is the dominant crop in Canada, rather than the fibrous flax variety.
Among the important industrial plant species is Linum usitatissimum usually cultivated for seed production (linseed) or as a fiber crop. Flax fibers are among the most widely used bio-fibers, this is due to the short life cycle of the plant (Yan et al., 2014). In addition, fiber performance and fiber mechanical properties which have a similar range to glass fibers with an average fiber density of 1.53, elastic modulus of 52.4 GPa, strain at break of 2.15% and strength at break of 976 MPa (Lefeuvre et al., 2014) makes it a very attractive for industrial use. Chemical composition of flax fibers can be divided as follows: cellulose constitute 70-75% of the fiber, with other constituents 15-20% hemicellulose, 3% lignin, and 3% pectin (Van Dam & Gorshkova, 2003).
Presently, there is no use for flax straw after seed harvesting. Growing flax is usually associated with the “the straw management problem”. Oilseed flax has a substantial amount of long tough bast fibers that decay slowly over time. This makes it difficult to incorporate flax straw into the soil after harvest (Flax Council of Canada, 2020). Influenced by both the planted acreage and rainfall, flax straws are produced in a range of 500,000 to 1,000,000 tonnes annually (Flax Council of Canada, 2020). The oilseed flax straw usually contains fibers at a range of 15-25%. As such, the annual pure fiber production from flax grown in Canada would be between 75,000 and 250,000 tonnes (Flax Council of Canada, 2020). In general, the process of obtaining flax bast fibers is based on a traditional value-added chain consisting of field drying and retting of bast fiber crops. The procedure is followed by mechanical processing of dry straw by means of decortication and the separation of the fibers form the non-fibrous components of flax stalks (shives/hurds) (Gusovius et al., 2019).
If flax straws' get processed, they usually find their destination in the paper industry, specifically cigarette paper, and lower end plastic composites (Saskatchewan Flax Development Commission, 2020b). Other medium value uses of flax fibers include middle quality plastic composite, fertilizers, absorbent materials, insulating materials, geotextiles, and low-end textiles.
Flax fibers that are fed into the medium value industry are usually free of shives (which is the non-fiber parts of the stem), and has a uniform fiber diameter and length, and are usually partly or totally retted. These criteria add restrains to the choice of fibers used for medium value products. Industries processing such medium value products would usually characterize any flax fiber starting materials with short pieces of straw, plastic litter, weed seeds or stalks as undesirable for the final application(Saskatchewan Flax Development Commission, 2020b).
On the other hand, high end uses of flax fibers can include high-end plastic composites, and textile applications. For the purpose of these applications, flax fibers should be completely free of shives, have good strength, consistent length and distribution. Also, the stems' fibers should have a good and similar degree of retting to ensure fiber consistency. Any flax fibers that are extracted from unretted straws, has plastic litter, or short pieces of straw, seeds or seed holders would be categorized as unsuitable for high end uses (Saskatchewan Flax Development Commission, 2020b).
Developing valuable materials from Bio-waste valorization is seen to promote benefits to the environment. Concept of converting the Bio-wastes from agriculture to biopolymer-based aerogels is aimed. The Bio-wastes from agriculture have rich amounts of biopolymers such as cellulose, lignin, hemicellulose and other polysaccharides which can be utilized to produce demanding applied materials such as aerogels (Phanthong et al., 2018; Lohri et al., 2017; Wojnowska-Baryła et al., 2020).
Cellulose aerogels prepared from agricultural residues/wastepaper and cottons were demonstrated to be super thermal insulators (Li et al., 2011; Sun et al., 2020; Garemar et al., 2020; Song et al., 2018; Kaya & Tabak, 2020; Ha et al., 2015; Thai et al., 2019).
Technologies for the production of functionalized cellulose aerogels with reduced thermal and acoustic insulation properties and flame retardancy have been reported as well (Wicklein et al., 2014; Feng et al., 2016; Guo et al., 2018.). Highly porous wood-based materials were recently reported by delignifying method and removal of hemicellulose and wood skeletal structure was retained from its original with wood hierarchical porous structure (Sun et al., 2020; Garemark et al., 2020; Song et al., 2018). By this method, authors have isolated the cellulose rich wood materials. Further employing freeze drying technique wood-like highly porous materials were produced. The materials are named “wood aerogel”. Li et al., 2011 reported lignocellulose aerogel from wood powder. Ionic liquid, 1-allyl-3-methylimidazolium chloride was used as solvent to prepare gels which then converted to aerogel by supercritical CO2 drying. The final aerogel had two components which are non-dissolved wood part and interconnected nanofibrillar cellulose network.
In literatures, various methods of the extraction of cellulose-rich raw products was reported and it can be achieved by known chemical methods such as acid and/alkali hydrolysis followed by surface treatment with oxidizing medium (e.g., hypochlorite or peroxide) (Łukajtis et al., 2018; Ng et al., 2015; Trilokesh & Uppuluri 2019). In our experiments, we have employed alkali hydrolysis (NaOH) followed by bleaching using (KOH and H2O2). Typically, agricultural plant materials have a mixture of amorphous and crystalline regions. The crystalline amount can vary between 40 and 60%. During the extraction process, most of the lignin and hemicellulose can be removed out and cellulose rich raw products can be collected. Mostly, the crystallinity of this raw cellulose is cellulose I. Cellulose wet gels can be prepared by physical dissolution (e.g., molten salt hydrate or sodium hydroxide-water-urea) and regeneration methods (Wang & Zhang 2016; Budtova, 2019; Budtova & Navard 2016; Buchtová & Budtova, 2016; Ciolacu, et al., 2016; Habibi & Lucia, 2012; Liebner et al., 2015; Liebner et al., 2008) or by mechanical disintegration of fibers via ultrasonication (Pääkkö, et al., 2008; Kobayashi et al., 2014; Sehaqui et al., 2010; Svagan et al., 2007). The wet alcogels can be converted to aerogels by supercritical drying. After preparing aerogels by regeneration methods from solution, the crystallinity is mostly degraded to cellulose II.
Since 1818, regenerated cellulose, i.e., “cellulose II”, often called man-made cellulose is commercially produced in the form of fibres in Textile industries in the name of RAYON or VISCOSE. These fibres are produced by dissolution of “cellulose I” in Cupro method (water-copper-ammonium salts, producing RAYON), in viscose method (NaOH-water and CS2 as solvent, producing VISCOSE) and Lyocell method (N-methyl morpholine N-oxide (NMMO) as solvent, also producing VISCOSE).
Cellulose I is a high crystalline material found in nature having parallel arrangement of molecular chain whereas cellulose II is a low crystalline material (not found in nature). In the dissolution process of cellulose I crystals, the molecules are disintegrated from the crystalline domain and in the regeneration process, they aggregate to form antiparallel aggregated structure, i.e., insoluble cellulose II. In general, it can be said that cellulose I powder (thermodynamically metastable) is converted to cellulose II (very stable).
Thus, it can be understood that NaOH-water based solvent systems together with some additives such as CS2, urea, etc, have been used in the industries for the dissolution of cellulose. This concept of dissolution of cellulose I using different solvents and regeneration of cellulose II was utilized by many groups of scientists for the production of classical aerogels.
Other methods reporting in preparation of cellulose I aerogels from cellulose nanocrystals, cellulose nanowhiskers and cellulose nanofibers. In this process, no dissolution of cellulose occurs. Cellulose I nanomaterials may have surface functional groups depending upon the method of production of cellulose nanomaterials. Mostly cellulose nanomaterials are dispersed in water medium prior to gelation. Mechanical, heat or chemical (acid or alkali) treatments can induce the self-assembly of nanostructures in a random fashion forming wet-gel network by percolation of the nanomaterials (using van der Waals forces). Once wet-gel network is formed, further washing, solvent exchange and supercritical drying (sometimes freeze drying is appropriate) processes can assist the aerogel production.
The concept and terminology of aerogel was first brought up by Kistler in 1932. The term designates a gel like material with its liquid content being replaced with gas, but without collapsing the solid interconnected network of the gel (Kistler, 1932). While the process of aerogel development was known to be a complicated multistage preparation procedure. Recent advancements in the manufacturing technologies allowed for the preparation of different types of aerogels, for example inorganic aerogels prepared from SiO2, TiO2, SnO2, V2O5, and Al2O3 (Baumann et al., 2005; Corrias et al., 2004; Le et al., 1996; Leventis et al., 2002; Masson et al., 1996), natural macromolecule-based aerogels from alginate, protein, chitosan, and hemicellulose (Betz et al., 2012; Chang et al., 2008; Deze et al., 2012; García-González et al., 2011; Salam et al., 2011), carbon aerogels from carbon, carbon nanotubes and graphene(Aliev et al., 2009; Fairen-Jiménez et al., 2006; Worsley et al., 2010), and synthetic polymer-based aerogels made from resorcinol-formaldehyde, polyvinylchloride, polypropylene and polyimide (Al-Muhtaseb & Ritter, 2003; Daniel et al., 2008; Guo et al., 2012; Yamashita et al., 2003) can be easily prepared. When it comes to bio-aerogel synthesis, cellulose serves as a convenient macromolecule, while being the most abundance biopolymer on earth (Long et al., 2018) and being entirely compostable and biocompatible. Cellulose derived materials such as cellulose fibers, cellulose composites, cellulose-based films, and cellulose hydrogels and aerogels, all hold immense potential benefits when compared to synthesized polymer equivalents (Moreno-Castilla & Maldonado-Hódar, 2005).
The object of the present invention resides in upcycling the fiber residues to high value lignocellulose/cellulose-rich products).
In a first embodiment of the invention, the above-mentioned object is solved by a process for the manufacturing of bio-based aerogels derived from crystalline cellulose extracted from plants' fiber residues, by
The present invention is illustrated and described herein with reference to the drawings, in which any like reference numbers denote like method steps and/or system components, respectively, and in which:
Again, the object of the present invention resides in upcycling the fiber residues to high value lignocellulose/cellulose-rich products.
In a first embodiment of the invention, the above-mentioned object is solved by a process for the manufacturing of bio-based aerogels derived from crystalline cellulose extracted from plants' fiber residues, by
In step d), any method known from the prior art for preparation of aerogels can be used. Preparation of aerogels typically includes gelation of the solution and subsequent drying of the gel under supercritical and/or ambient conditions. However, the invention is not limited to a particular method of aerogel preparation.
The step (b) of bleaching is optional. Preferably, the inventive method comprises bleaching step (b).
The inventive method preferably does not comprise any purification step or any regeneration step of the cellulose fibers.
In the present invention, in particular, hemp and flax fibers were used as agricultural residues and aimed to prepare cellulose-based aerogels. However, the present invention is not limited to these plants but may be realized in the same way with other fibers based for example on seeds, leaves, straw and/or bast.
The invention herein in particular is a bio-based aerogel derived from crystalline cellulose extracted from plants' stem fiber residues, particularly flax and hemp bast fibers. The resulting aerogel products ranged from continuous sheets (obtained from flax fiber residues), or beads (obtained from hemp fiber residues). The core of this approach lies in the high percent recovery of nano-cellulose fibers from biomass residual materials. The invention is directed towards reducing the high manufacturing cost of aerogels which is a major limiting factor in their commercialization and large-scale production. In addition, it is the aim to produce biocompatible, biodegradable, and thermally stable bio-aerogel that can have various application as insulators, medical materials, and aerospace materials.
Cellulose can be extracted using the alkali hydrolysis followed by bleaching. Cellulose raw products can be dissolved in solvent medium of NaOH-urea-water. Cellulose solution having low viscosity or cellulose having degree of polymerization ≤350 can be used in particular in the particulate form of aerogels production. Low crystalline cellulose rich raw products can also be used in the preparation of particulate form of aerogels. Cellulose solution having high viscosity or cellulose having degree of polymerization ≥350 can be used in particular in the monolithic form of aerogels production. Hemp or flax fibers after alkali treatment can be used in the fiber-reinforced aerogels production. In this case two different crystalline products can be present in the aerogel sample. In the final aerogel product, no traces of lignin or hemicellulose was identified which was confirmed by FTIR spectra. The crystallinity of the cellulose rich extracted products can be varied by employing different reaction conditions as explained in particular in the examples (Exp1 and Exp2 or Exp7).
Lowering the crystallinity of the cellulose makes the solution preparation step easier than preparing solutions from very high crystalline cellulose fibers.
A preferred embodiment of the invention is characterized in that retted and/or unretted fiber residues being used. The benefit of using retted fibers is the high content of crystalline reinforced structure leading to high mechanical strength of aerogels. The benefit of using unretted fibers is to provide less reinforced raw structures. Adjustment of mechanical strength is available by combining the retted and unretted raw materials.
Preferably, the process of the invention uses stems of hemp and/or flax, in particular flax and/or hemp bast fibers. The benefit of using stems of hemp and/or flax, is disclosed in the paragraph mentioned above.
A further embodiment of the invention is seen in the manufacture of reinforced bio-based aerogels according to the process of claim 1 by adding fiber and/or particulate material into step (a) and/or (b). The benefit is to use extracted cellulose fibers having less/no lignin and hemicellulose components.
In a further preferred embodiment of the invention the fiber and/or particulate material comprises, in particular consists of cellulose fibers. The benefit for this is seen in that lignin and hemicellulose or other components in plants influence the gelation process and the final properties of cellulose. The cellulose rich fibres can be processed to make high value aerogel materials. It must be necessary to produce high quality fine cellulose materials considering the applications in medical and food industries.
In an alternative embodiment, the step (b) of the process may be omitted and fibers of raw agricultural fibers and/or particulate material of cellulose are directly employed in steps (a), (c) and (d). In this embodiment, particularly a randomly connected network of microfibers may be formed.
In a further preferred embodiment of the invention the aerogel products range from continuous sheets, in particular from flax fiber residues, or beads in particular from hemp fiber residues.
The present invention further relates to Bio-based aerogels derived from crystalline cellulose extracted from plants' fiber residues, obtainable by a process as defined above. Benefits are in particular the high quality of the processed products.
The present invention provides aerogels as valuable product in particular from hemp and flax fiber wastes (agricultural residues) is new in this field of research. Easy, economically feasible and environmentally friendly methods were developed.
Cellulose I and Cellulose II fiber extraction methods from NaOH solution either by heating at 60° C. or cooling at −20° C. were reported without any additional complicated procedures. Mostly in literatures, the extraction of cellulose processes was reported from NaOH solution or alkali solutions together with complicated additional acid (highly concentrated) treatment procedures. Additional point, in industries cellulose I was considered as the valuable product and not cellulose II. Cellulose II extraction was considered in different literatures but not by the cooling method.
Cellulose extractions have been carried out until now by mechanical, enzymatic, chemical (acid and/alkali) treatments or combination of two of those treatments. Scientists and industries focused on the extraction of cellulose I, because it has high strength and robust mechanical properties. It can be used as starting material for regenerated cellulose (i.e., cellulose II), reagent for many derivatives of cellulose and on of the components for biocomposites synthesis.
The present invention thus provides a novel method for the direct extraction of cellulose II from fibers without any additional step or any purification. In methods know from the prior art, extraction of cellulose II requires an extraction and complicated regeneration. The present invention particularly provides chemical treatment (NaOH-water system, cooling, urea or without urea) for delignification and removal of other non-cellulose-based organic matter. It is an easy removal of any non-cellulose content in plant wastes. It has surprisingly been found that addition of urea may enhance the degradation of crystallinity forming pure cellulose II; in the absence of urea, cellulose may be obtained with a crystallinity of mixture of cellulose I and cellulose II.
Particularly, it has been found that when hydrolysis (step a)) is carried out at temperature of 15 to 100° C., preferably 40 to 70° C., particularly 60° C., in the absence of urea, cellulose I may be extracted form plant fibers, particularly hemp and flax fibers. Hydrolysis (step a)) at a temperature of between −196 to 0° C., preferably −50 to −10° C., particularly −20° C., facilitates the direct extraction of cellulose II without further purification. Addition of urea enhances the degradation of crystallinity forming cellulose II. Thus, in the absence of urea, cellulose was obtained with crystallinity of cellulose I and cellulose II and when using urea, cellulose II was obtained.
For the hemp and flax fibers, NaOH treatment (EXP1, EXP2 or EXP7) is good enough. If there are any traces of lignin and hemicellulose present, they can be removed while preparing the aerogels using the NaOH-Urea-Water as solvent medium.
Aerogels can be produced from Cellulose I and Cellulose II fibers. Crystallinity degraded cellulose (by EXP7) provides mostly low viscous solutions and the fiber length and thickness are relatively thinner and smaller than high crystalline cellulose fibers (by EXP1 and EXP2).
Cellulose fibers with high crystallinity can be used to prepare novel sponge like cellulose aerogels (EXP6a). These sponge porous materials can be used as template or supporting material of composite materials syntheses. EXP6b is a method of demonstration how these fibers can be used in the fiber-reinforced polysaccharide aerogel composites preparation.
For the gelation/regeneration of cellulose/lignocellulose/cellulose rich wet-gel network from cellulose/lignocellulose/cellulose rich solution, water/alcohol/acid containing water and/alcohol mixture can be employed as gelation/regeneration bath. The acid concentration can be varied between 0.1-3 M.
In general, out of hemp and flax fibers, aerogels in the form of particles/beads or monolithic forms can be prepared depending upon the crystallinity and the degree of polymerization.
Sodium hydroxide, potassium hydroxide, urea and hydrogen peroxide were obtained from Fischer Scientific. Microcrystalline cellulose (medium fiber, degree of polymerization 180-220 and long fibers, degree of polymerization >350) were obtained from Sigma Aldrich. Cellulose MN 2100 powder was obtained from Macherey-Nagel which is a native fibrous cellulose, purified grade with average degree of polymerization 620-680 and has fiber length of 20-75 um. The specific surface of cellulose MN 2100 powder according to Blaine is reported to be 0.55 m2/g. Distilled water was used for the synthesis of gels and ethanol (99%) having 1% of methyl ethyl ketone or petroleum ether was used for solvent exchange process. Cellulose powder was obtained from J. RETTENMAIER & SÖHNE GMBH+CO KG, with a degree of polymerization about 350. Cellulose powder from Alfa Aesar was obtained with a degree of polymerization 180-200.
With the reference material (commercial Cellulose MN 2100 powder), it is demonstrated that the fibers with a thickness in the range (20-75 um) and degree of polymerization >600 can be used in the EXP6a and EXP6b to produced fiber-reinforced cellulose aerogels with sponge structure or as supporting materials in the composite's syntheses.
With the reference material (cellulose medium fiber, sigma Aldrich, degree of polymerization 180-220 or microcrystalline cellulose from Alfa aesar with a degree of polymerization 180-200), it is demonstrated that cellulose fibers can be used for the preparation of cellulose aerogel particles or beads.
With reference material (cellulose from J. RETTENMAIER & SÖHNE GMBH+CO KG, degree of polymerization about 350 or cellulose long fibers from sigma Aldrich with a degree of polymerization >350), it is demonstrated that the cellulose monolithic samples can be prepared in the form of sheets or big blocks (10 cm diameter and 5 cm height cylinders).
In a round bottom flask, 50 g of plant residues (hemp/flax) fibers were soaked in 1800 g of sodium hydroxide (8 wt. %) solution and left to stand for 16 hours at room temperature. The mixture was heated at 60° C. for 3 hours. After cooling to room temperature, the mixture was neutralized with acetic acid. The fibers were collected by filtration. Further they were washed several times with distilled water until the supernatant turned to be colorless. Then they were washed with ethanol (technical grade, 99%) and acetone. Finally, the fibers were oven dried at 50° ° C. The yield was 75-80%.
The product from step 1 was taken in a round bottom flask containing 1800 g of potassium hydroxide (5 wt. %) solution. To this mixture, 90 mL of hydrogen peroxide in water (30%) was added and gently stirred. The mixture was left to stand at room temperature for 16 hours. During this period, the fibers were turned to be dull white in color. To complete the bleaching process, the mixture was heated at 60° C. for 3 hours. After cooling to room temperature, the mixture was neutralized with acetic acid, washed with water, ethanol and acetone and oven dried. The yield was about 85-90%.
7 g of sodium hydroxide was dissolved in distilled water (81 g) which is an exothermic reaction. After cooling to room temperature, cellulose fibers were added, and the suspension was stirred for about 10 minutes. Then the mixture was cooled in an ice bath to 0° C. It was stirred for an hour and to this mixture 12 g of urea was added. The dissolution of urea is an endothermic reaction. The stirring was continued for an hour and then left stirring at room temperature. At room temperature, the mixture was observed to be opaque. Then it was stored at −20° C. for 18 hours. After bringing the mixture to room temperature, it appeared to be pale yellow clear viscous liquid.
3 wt. % of cellulose solution of unretted hemp, unretted flax and retted flax fibers were employed for the beads production. The cellulose solutions were prepared by the method reported above (see Exp3). The drop height between nozzle tip and the surface of the regeneration bath was set about 0.8 to 1.3 cm in the case of unretted and retted flax fibers. The drop height for unretted hemp fiber was about 18 cm. In the case of retted hemp fibers, the viscosity of the solution was much higher than unretted hemp fibers when the raw fibers were employed in the same procedure with the same condition. In order to make beads out of retted hemp fibers, they were treated once again in the Exp1 with alkali solution. Then it was employed in the solution preparation, the viscosity of the solution was reduced. Then the solution was employed in dropping technique for the beads production. The drop height of this solution was 0.5-0.8 cm. The beads were prepared by dropping the aqueous alkali solution of cellulose into the aqueous acetic acidic medium. The beads were collected after 30 minutes of reaction time in acidic medium and washed several times with water until the supernatant of the washed solution turned to be neutral. Then the aqueous medium was exchanged with ethanol. The alcogels were supercritically dried in order to obtain aerogels.
5 wt. % of cellulose solution of unretted and retted hemp and flax fibers were employed in the production of monolithic forms. The cellulose solutions were prepared by the method Exp3. The solution was brought to room temperature and stirred for a while in order to make the solution to be homogeneous. Then the solution was transferred to molds and warmed at 50° C. for 30 minutes. After cooling to room temperature, the solution (viscous liquid) was layered with acetic acid (10 wt. %) in technical ethanol (99% ethanol containing 1% of petroleum ether or methyl ethyl ketone). The volume of the mixture of acetic acid and ethanol was approximately equal to the volume of the cellulose solution. The gelation happened by the neutralization and the rate of diffusion of acid through the alkali solution of cellulose controlled the gelation rate. It took about 5 hours to 24 hours depending upon the thickness of the sample and diffusion rate. The wet gels in monolithic form were prepared and washed several times with water until the supernatant of the washed solution turned to be neutral.
Then the aqueous medium was exchanged with ethanol. The alcogels were supercritically dried in order to obtain aerogels.
Hemp or flax fibers were used as raw material or after Exp1 in this experiment. Example of retted flax fiber was described below. In an alternative, it can be prepared also from raw product using the same procedure. It is included here after experimenting in the laboratory. After employing this procedure from EXP 6a, cellulose-rich or lignocellulosic aerogels have been obtained.
Then each sample was layered with 20 wt. % of acetic acid in technical ethanol. The volume of the mixture of acetic acid and ethanol was approximately equal to the volume of the cellulose-NaOH-urea-water mixture. The samples were kept at 50° C. for the complete gelation and reinforcement of fibers. The gelation happened by the neutralization and the rate of diffusion of acid through the alkali solution of cellulose controlled the gelation rate. It took about 5 hours to 24 hours depending upon the thickness of the sample and diffusion rate.
The wet gels in monolithic form were prepared and washed several times with water until the supernatant of the washed solution turned to be neutral. Then the aqueous medium was exchanged with ethanol. The alcogels were supercritically dried in order to obtain aerogels. The clean hydrogels/alcogels or hexane or pentane exchanged gels from Exp 6a were ambiently (air) dried at standard temperature and pressure to obtain xerogels.
Exp 6a, followed by 6c or 6d resulted in a kind of aerogel where the fibers were fused together randomly forming three dimensional network. In between the fibers of different thickness very big macropores were generated. The wet samples were also used for the generation of xerogels, where hydrogel/alcogel or hexane or pentane exchanged gels were dried under ambient drying, as outlined above.
EXP 6b, followed by 6c or 6d resulted in a kind of two component composite aerogels, in which, one component was fibres of raw materials or after Exp 1. This first component brings the microstructure of EXP6a. The second component was commercial cellulose of any art (degree of polymerization <400) or cellulose extracted from after EXP2 or EXP7. This second component filled the macropores which were developed between the microfibres (EXP 6a).
The cellulose raw fibers can be directly converted to cellulose II powder by this following method. Additionally, this step can remove the non-cellulose materials such as lignin and hemicellulose from agricultural residues. In a round bottom flask, 50 g of plant residues (hemp/flax) fibers were soaked in 1800 g of sodium hydroxide (8 wt. %) solution and left to stand at −20° C. for overnight. Then the mixture was warmed to room temperature. The mixture was heated at 60° C. for 3 hours. After cooling to room temperature, the mixture was neutralized with acetic acid. The fibers were collected by filtration. Further they were washed several times with distilled water until the supernatant turned to be colorless. Then they were washed with ethanol (technical grade, 99%) and acetone. Finally, the fibers were oven dried at 50° C. The yield was 75-80%. The product was confirmed to cellulose II crystalline material.
Alternatively, the step of heating at 60° C. for 3 hours and cooling to room temperature may be omitted and the mixture may directly be neutralized with acetic acid at room temperature after cooling to −20° C. overnight. In this process, the addition of urea (12 wt %) to the sodium hydroxide solution before cooling enhanced the extraction of pure cellulose II.
Hemp, flax fibers and flax stem were treated by alkali hydrolysis and bleaching in order to extract cellulose-rich raw products. The yield of cellulose raw product was about 60-65% for hemp and flax fibers. For flax stem, the yield was low that was about 45-50%. During this cellulose extraction process, it was aimed to remove other non-cellulose components such as lignin and hemicellulose. Cellulose rich raw product was white in color (
Cellulose beads were prepared from hemp and flax fibers. Scanning electron microscopic images of cellulose beads were shown in
5 wt. % of cellulose rich raw products from flax stem was employed for the beads production. Before beads production, the dispersion was 5 times cooled (−20° C.) and warmed (22° C.). Each time the dispersion was stirred for 5 hours at room temperature. Due to the presence of yellow color wood stem pieces (about 60 wt.), the solution was appeared to be a finely distributed good colloidal dispersion. The wood stem products did not get precipitate even standing the solution for more than 5 hours at room temperature. This colloidal dispersion of cellulose was used in Exp4. The particles/beads of size about 2 mm were prepared and they were rich yellow in color. Scanning electron images were shown in
The microstructure of
Monolithic form of cellulose aerogels (3 and 5 wt. %) were analyzed. The bulk density was 0.097±0.002 g/mL and 0.18±0.01 g/mL for 3 and 5 wt. % respectively. The scanning electron microscopic images were shown in
The cellulose aerogels prepared by the EXP6a was observed to be sponge. The bulk density of 4 wt. % of the unretted hemp fibers-reinforced cellulose aerogels was about 0.061+0.02 g/mL. The microstructures of the samples were shown in
The same procedure EXP6a was employed for unretted flax fibers.
Cellulose MN 2100 powder was employed in the EXP6a in order to follow the experimental reproducibility for the commercial cellulose fibers having defined properties such as fiber length of 20-75 um and degree of polymerization 620-680. The EXP6a was successful and we obtained monolithic samples from cellulose MN 2100 powders. The specific surface area of the aerogels was 89 m2/g and BJH cumulative pore volume was 0.6623 cm3/g. Comparing these properties with the unretted hemp fiber-reinforced cellulose aerogels, it can be concluded that the methodology EXP6a can provide the same pattern of network and the physical properties such as specific surface area and pore volume could also be in the same range.
EXP6b was performed with commercial cellulose powder together with hemp and flax fibers. Commercial cellulose powder was used more than 5 wt % in order to fil the sponge porous structure of hemp and flax fibers what can be observed in the
The confirmation of purity was analyzed by FTIR measurements.
It is known from
Preparing cellulose aerogels from cellulose II was achieved and the samples should be characterized further. 5 wt % of cellulose solution was prepared from crystallinity degraded retted hemp fibers and retted flax fibers. They were used in the preparation of aerogel beads.
| Number | Date | Country | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 2021 108 166.1 | Mar 2021 | DE | national |
This application is a U.S. National Stage Entry Under 35 U.S.C. 371 of International Application No. PCT/EP2022/058701 filed on Mar. 31, 2022, which claims priority to DE 10 2021 108 166.1 filed on Mar. 31, 2021, the contents of which are incorporated herein by reference in their entireties.
| Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| PCT/EP2022/058701 | 3/31/2022 | WO |
