Patent Application
20100102075
Not Applicable
The present invention relates to a hinge construction generally for a container and lid assembly and, more particularly, to a hinge assembly for securing a container and lid assembly using a substantially straight hinge pin.
With reference to
The most common and current way of retaining the pin once it has been installed is via a protrusion or hump that is interference fitted into a slot in the lid. When the pin is installed, the protrusion is captured in the slot and the pin is retained. An example of this conventional construction is shown in
Inherent disadvantages of these designs are apparent in any attempt to automate the assembly process. That is, the pin must be properly oriented in two dimensions. Additionally, the bump or bend must be oriented to enter the hinge last, and must be oriented vertically to engage the locking point. Automatic feeding mechanisms that can reliably achieve proper orientation are prohibitively complex and expensive.
It would thus be desirable to enable a hinge pin assembly to utilize a substantially straight hinge pin, offering an advantage in automation because orientation is simplified. Retention, however, becomes an important consideration, and the present invention endeavors to utilize the physical properties of polyolefins and the like to positively retain a substantially straight hinge pin.
In an exemplary embodiment, a container assembly includes a container, a plastic lid secured to the container via a hinge, and a substantially straight hinge pin secured in the hinge. The plastic lid includes a portion of a hinge line shaped to receive the substantially straight hinge pin and secure the lid to the container. The hinge line portion is initially closed via a plastic wall at least one end, where the plastic wall remains with an entry hole therein after passing the hinge pin through the plastic wall such that the hinge pin is held in the hinge line portion via natural contraction of the entry hole formed by the hinge pin by virtue of elastic properties of the plastic wall.
In another exemplary embodiment, a container includes a container body including a first portion of a hinge line, and a lid securable to the container body and including a second portion of the hinge line. A hinge assembly is coupled between the container body and the lid via the first and second hinge line portions and includes a substantially straight hinge pin. The hinge pin is a third portion of the hinge line. At least one end of at least one of the first and second hinge line portions is initially closed via a plastic wall, the plastic wall remaining with an entry hole therein after passing the hinge pin through the plastic wall such that the hinge pin is secured in the first and second hinge line portions via natural contraction of the entry hole formed by the hinge pin by virtue of elastic properties of the plastic wall.
In yet another exemplary embodiment, a method of assembling a container assembly includes the steps of closing at least one end of the hinge line via a plastic wall; passing a substantially straight hinge pin through the plastic wall and forming an entry hole therein, the plastic wall remaining with the entry hole therein after passing the hinge pin through the plastic wall; and securing the hinge pin in the hinge line via natural contraction of the entry hole formed by the hinge pin by virtue of elastic properties of the plastic wall.
These and other aspects and advantages of the present invention will be described in detail with reference to the accompanying drawings, in which:
As shown in
In operation, very little or no plastic is removed via the insertion of the hinge pin 16′, but is forced aside leaving residual axial and radial stresses. As soon as the hinge pin 16′ clears the wall (
Preferably, the material of the plastic wall is a polyolefin material having particular elastomeric and creep properties. For example, the elastomeric and creep properties of the polyolefin material according to the present invention may be configured such that a predetermined time (e.g., three days) after a 0.100 inch diameter pin has been inserted through the closed wall 22, the entry hole is approximately 0.060 inches in diameter. Careful selection of hinge pin 16′ diameter, wall thickness and pin end configuration allow the substantially straight pin 16′ to be securely retained.
Pin diameters of 0.100 inch are preferred because this is the nominal diameter for the application. Significantly smaller pin diameters may require modification of lid and container hinge dimensions, would reduce ruggedness of the lid to container attachment, would reduce weight-bearing capability of the assembly, and may buckle when penetrating the barrier. Significantly larger pin diameters will require modification of the lid and container since the opening retaining the pin is typically 0.150 inch or less. Larger pins also have the disadvantage of using more material and hence being more expensive without providing any advantage to the assembly.
Wall thicknesses of 0.025-0.035 inch were found to be optimum with the components tested. This thickness is specific to a particular polymer (i.e., HDPE) and specification. Harder polymers might require a thinner wall for optimum penetration while softer polymers might tolerate thicker walls. Walls that are too thin may tear upon penetration and fail to capture the pin while thicker walls require larger components to provide penetrating force.
Modest bevels at both ends of the pin are standard specifications for this type of component. The bevel is relatively simple to apply in manufacturing and removes jagged edges that may have been left when the pin was cut. This provides an acceptable penetrator without modification, and the end opposite the penetration retains a flat end to which accommodates the end of a ram for inserting the pin in the automated process. If the pin were sharpened, the penetration would require less force, however the expense of sharpening is generally not worth the force reduction. Pins that are cut and have no secondary operation tend to have ends that are larger than the pin diameter, which increases the penetrating force and enlarges the hole left in the wall.
With the hinge assembly according to the present invention, a substantially straight hinge pin can be securely retained. As a consequence, economically advantageous automation of a typically labor-intensive assembly process is facilitated.
While the invention has been described in connection with what is presently considered to be the most practical and preferred embodiments, it is to be understood that the invention is not to be limited to the disclosed embodiments, but on the contrary, is intended to cover various modifications and equivalent arrangements included within the spirit and scope of the appended claims.
This application is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/284,474, filed Oct. 31, 2002, pending, the entire content of which is hereby incorporated by reference in this application.
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Parent | 10284474 | Oct 2002 | US |
| Child | 12652163 | US |
