The current invention concerns a hinge device, more specifically, but not necessarily, for the installation of a door on the body of a motor vehicle.
So-called pantograph doors for buses have long been known. In them, a hinge device is formed by a pair of arms whose one end respectively attaches at the level of a body-mounted axis and whose other end attaches at the level of an axis connected to the door. The effective length of these two arms, that is to say, the spacing distance between their two axes, must be equal, and so must also the spacing distance between the two door side axes be equal, on the one hand, and the spacing distance between the two body-mounted axes on the other hand, so that the door maintains its orientation upon opening and closing and so that, in an open position, the door can hang next to the door opening and be parallel to said opening against the body.
The parallel movement of the door leads to the situation that, upon closing, such doors are engaged all at once by the totality of their edges into the frame of the door opening, so that if another window or door is not open on the vehicle body, a temporary buildup of excess pressure is generated on the interior of the motor vehicle by the inward movement of the door, said pressure slowing down the movement of the door and, in this manner, hindering the door locking mechanism from catching. Another problem consists therein that when the door is inadvertently opened while the vehicle is being driven, the relative wind—as opposed to the conventional case in which a door is mounted to the body by a single hinge on the front door edge, relative to the direction of travel—can bear down behind the partially-opened door and pry it completely wide open.
The object of the current invention is to create a hinge device for connecting a moving part with a stationary part in which, between the two mutually staggered yet oriented-in-parallel positions, the stationary part at least runs through a pivoted position relative to these parallel positions.
The task is resolved by a hinge device with the characteristics of claim 1.
When, in the case of the moving parts, we are dealing with a door as described above, these two parallel positions can correspond to a closed door position and to an open arrested door position in which said door rests offset alongside the body, in parallel to the closed position. By virtue of having to run through a pivoted position to get from the closed position to the open parallel position, the movement involved upon closing the door is not an exact parallel translational motion so that a pressure buildup on the interior of the motor vehicle is avoided and the door can fall unobstructed into the lock. With the proper orientation of the pivoted position in terms of the relative wind, the latter exerts a force upon the door that is in the direction of the closed door; an unexpected wide open prying of the door is thus excluded.
In order that between the two end positions of the hinge device head pieces in terms of the arm, two counter running traverse movements of the head pieces are obtained relative to one another, then in a first of these end positions the spacing distance of a first point of incidence, at which the traction belt impinges upon the first belt pulley, should be smaller from the axis of this first belt pulley than the spacing distance of a second point of incidence, at which the traction belt impinges upon the second belt pulley, from the axis of the second belt pulley, while in the second end position the spacing distance conditions should be the reverse. Thus, translational conditions are achieved that are respectively greater or smaller than one between the rotations of the head pieces relative to the arm in the various end positions.
Preferably, at least the one non-circular belt pulley is elliptical. The other belt pulley is preferably circular or also elliptical.
When both belt pulleys are elliptical, then they should be properly oriented in terms of one another so that a strong swiveling movement of the door can be achieved between the two end positions. For two ellipses of a given form and with the same circumferential length, the maximal swivel lift is attained when in one position of the first belt pulley in which the points of incidence of the belt at the first belt pulley are the points of intersection of the long axis with the circumference of the ellipse, the points of incidence at the other belt pulley respectively lie at the points of intersection of the short axis with the circumference.
In order to achieve a broad range of free swivel motion for the hinge device, it can be advantageous when the arm is angled and the traction belt between the belt pulleys is guided on two rollers.
Additional characteristics and advantages of the invention emerge from the following description of exemplary embodiments while referencing the appended figures. The figures show:
To clarify the principle of the invention and its effects, we shall first briefly explain the hinge device that is not in accordance with the invention as per
In the hinge device in
The first form of embodiment of the hinge device 11 in accordance with the invention shown in
Assuming that the direction of travel of the vehicle runs from right to left in the figure, the relative wind would hit obliquely on the outside of the partially-opened door represented in
To the extent of the manner in which the arm 5 is swung, the points of incidence 12 through 15 of the traction belt 4 on the belt pulleys 3, 6 wander, whereby the spacing distance of the points of incidence 12, 13 from the rotational axis of the belt pulley 3 continuously increases, while the corresponding spacing distance for the points of incidence 14, 15 of the circular belt pulley 6 remains the same. The greater the spacing distance becomes at the belt pulley 3, the smaller the translational relation becomes so that the initial pivoting movement of the door in the counterclockwise direction over the course of opening becomes slower and slower and finally reverses its direction. In the open position of the door 1, once more represented by dashed lines, the points of incidence 12, 13 respectively lie at the point of intersection of a long axis L of the ellipse with the circumferential surface of the belt pulley 3, and the orientation of the door is the same as in the closed position.
The prerequisite condition for the orientational positions of the door to be the same in the open position as in the closed position consists therein that the path traveled by the points of incidence be the same on the two belt pulleys upon opening and closing. In the case represented here, of a freely-pivoting movement of 90° between the open and closed position, this corresponds to the requirement that the circumferential length of both belt pulleys 3, 6 must be the same. Based on the full scale enlargement or reduction of the belt pulley 3 relative to the belt pulley 6, one can however achieve the effect that with an angle of traverse of less than 90° or precisely with an angle of traverse of more than 90°, the door can once more assume an orientation that is parallel to its closed position.
While in
An intensification of the swivel movement is achieved in that, as shown in the exemplary embodiment of
As already explained in reference to
Another possibility for ensuring parallel orientational positions of the door in the closed state and in the open stop state with two identical belt pulleys 3, 6 is represented in
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
10 2004 008 069 | Feb 2004 | DE | national |
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind | 371c Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
PCT/EP2005/001661 | 2/18/2005 | WO | 00 | 12/21/2005 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2005/083213 | 9/9/2005 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
513589 | Metz | Jan 1894 | A |
530058 | Schaum et al. | Nov 1894 | A |
596289 | Smith | Dec 1897 | A |
2378634 | Hussey | Jun 1945 | A |
3016261 | Tatter | Jan 1962 | A |
3899932 | Durham | Aug 1975 | A |
4181034 | Daniel | Jan 1980 | A |
4607812 | De Haan et al. | Aug 1986 | A |
4865577 | Freudenstein | Sep 1989 | A |
5289615 | Banks et al. | Mar 1994 | A |
5882025 | Runnels | Mar 1999 | A |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
1 027 558 | Apr 1958 | DE |
1 174 183 | Jul 1964 | DE |
19827813 | Dec 1999 | DE |
2 731 461 | Sep 1996 | FR |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20070096503 A1 | May 2007 | US |