Patent Application
20080201907
The present invention relates to a hinge for wings or doors.
In particular, the present invention relates to a hinge which can be used for constraining the doors of electrical appliances, such as ovens, to the respective supporting structures.
In the following description and by way of example only, without limiting the scope of the invention, the present invention is described with reference to an oven.
Hinges of this type normally consist of two separate parts, kinematically connected to one another, directly or by inserting a lever between them.
More precisely, the first of said parts is fixed to the oven structure at one side of the oven mouth, whilst the second part is fixed to one edge of the door, which in that way is rendered movable, with a tilting action, relative to the above-mentioned oven mouth.
One or more elastic elements are inserted between the two parts of the hinge.
During door rotation starting from its closed position, the elastic elements oppose, during a first step, the detachment of the door from the oven supporting frame and, in a second step, they oppose the subsequent rotation of the door and its consequent lowering to an end of stroke position in which the oven mouth is completely open.
In this second opening step, the door, under the combined action of its own weight which promotes its descent and of the elastic elements which apply a braking action, performs a gradual rotation.
During door rotation starting from its open end of stroke position, the action of the elastic elements is first balanced by the weight of the door, initially guaranteeing gradual closing rotation; however, then, in the absence of a braking action by the user, the elastic elements push the door towards the oven frame with sufficient force to guarantee its effective closing.
Basically, the presence of the hinges with elastic elements balances the door, so that when it is opened it does not drop open, and when it is closed it does not forcefully spring back to its closed position.
In its opening and closing movements, irrespective of the action of the user, the door is subject to the action of two different torques, an “opening” torque to which the weight of the door contributes, and a “closing” torque, basically determined by the elastic reaction force of the hinge springs.
At least beyond a predetermined door opening angle, for example greater than 30°, the opening torque will advantageously be positive, whilst the closing torque will have a negative value.
Said values are the preferred values for good operation of the door. If the spring or springs contained in the hinge were too weak, the opening torque could become negative, requiring that the operator apply a braking action to door opening, otherwise the door would just drop open. In contrast, if the spring or springs were to generate an elastic reaction force that was too great, the closing torque could become positive, therefore resulting in violent door closing.
As already indicated, correct door operation basically requires that, at least beyond a predetermined opening angle, the opening torque is positive and the closing torque is negative.
The difference in the absolute value between the two torques in practice indicates the versatility of the hinge, that is to say, the range of different door weights that a predetermined hinge can balance.
Prior art hinges have the disadvantage of being suitable for balancing doors within a rather limited weight range, therefore obliging manufacturers and users to adopt extensive ranges of hinges in order to be able to vary the weights of the doors.
For example, the same electrical appliance, finished with covering surfaces which have different weights, must be fitted with different hinges. This means that in the worst case the hinges and door must be mounted only after the covering has been selected.
The aim of the present invention is therefore to increase the balancing capacity of a hinge, so that it can be used with a large number of doors having different weights, without modification of the elastic elements and/or changes to the adjustment or calibration being needed for each door.
Accordingly, the present invention provides a hinge for wings or doors comprising the features described in any of the claims herein.
The technical features of the present invention, in accordance with the above aim, are clear from the content of the claims herein, in particular claim 1 and, preferably, from any of the claims directly or indirectly dependent on claim 1.
The advantages of the present invention are more apparent in the detailed description which follows, with reference to the accompanying drawings which illustrate a preferred, non-limiting embodiment of the invention, in which:
With reference to
With reference to
As illustrated in
The connecting lever 7 comprises a first arm 8, designed to be rigidly constrained to the first box-shaped element 5, and a second arm 9 connected to the second box-shaped element 6.
For the connection between the second arm 9 and the second box-shaped element 6, the hinge 1 comprises a first pin 10 passing through a respective hole made at the end of the second arm 9 and coaxial with the axis A.
As illustrated in
The rod 11 is box-shaped and has a C-shaped cross-section, with a lower end 11a pivoting on the lever 7, at a pin P, in the substantially known way, and an upper end 11b which connects to a lower end 12a of the shaft 12.
The second box-shaped element 6 houses a first helical spring 13, fitted on the outside of the shaft 12 and stressed in compression, as described in more detail below.
With reference to
The separator 14 also forms a contact surface for a proximal end coil 13a of the spring 13.
The shaft 12 has an upper end 12b longitudinally opposite the end 12a hooked to the rod 12. The upper end 12b is designed to engage with a distal end coil 13b to compress the spring 14.
For the hinge 4, the spring 13 constitutes an elastic element designed to generate a reaction force which opposes door 3 opening.
Only when the closed position is almost reached, from and towards the closed position, overlapping with the above-mentioned elastic action of the spring 13 there is the action of a second pre-compressed helical spring 16, designed to operate in conjunction with a cam 7a made on the rocker lever 7, through a stem 17 acting on a cam follower 18, to give the door 3 a spring-to closing movement and to define a door stable semi-open position.
The structural and functional features of the second spring 23 have already been described in Italian patent application BO2006A000308 by the same Applicant, to which reference is made, and therefore, said features are not examined in depth in this description.
With reference to
With reference to
The two teeth 23 are designed to hook with a snap-on action on respective contact portions 19a, 19b formed by the same number of edges of the front wall 19 forming the opening 21.
The lateral projections 24a, 24b of the friction element 22 are each positioned opposite a respective longitudinal lateral wall 6a, 6b of the second box-shaped element 6 and, as is more clearly explained below, are designed to engage with the longitudinal walls 6a, 6b by rubbing.
With reference to
In the interaction of its projections 24a, 24b with the longitudinal walls 6a, 6b, the friction element 22 forms respective friction means 27 for the hinge 4.
The teeth 23 of the friction element 22 form removable means 28 for connecting the element 22 to the rod 11.
The following is a brief description of the operation of one of the two hinges 4 starting from the door 3 closed position, schematically illustrated in
The torque applied to the door 3 when it is opened, by the user and, beyond a predetermined rotation, by the weight of the door 3, conflicts with the torque generated by the spring 13, which therefore renders the movement of the door 3 towards the fully open position illustrated in
Starting from the door 3 fully open position illustrated in
In detail,
In passing from the closed configuration of
In the configuration illustrated in
When the wing or door 3 is opened by the user, that is to say, passing to the configuration illustrated in
The sliding of the projections 24a, 24b continues until the hinge 4 fully open configuration is reached, as illustrated in
In other words, the friction or rubbing created between the friction element 22 and the walls 6a, 6b of the second element 6 during their relative movement, causes a dissipation of energy, by friction.
It was realized that said dissipation, obtained by increasing hinge internal frictions, advantageously allows extension of the door weight range that a predetermined hinge can balance. Experimentally, it was found that a hinge of the type described, when it has no friction element 22, can balance doors of different weights within a range of approximately 350 g whilst, if the friction element 22 is used, the same hinge can effectively balance doors of different weight within a range of approximately 1000 g.
In other words, if the hinge without friction means 27, consisting for example of the friction element 22, can balance different doors 3 whose weights differ by a maximum of 350 g, the same hinge when fitted with the friction element 22 can effectively balance different doors 3 whose weights differ by up to 1000 g.
Therefore, the friction means 27 increase hinge 3 internal frictions by a value which does not make it difficult to move the door and so they make it possible to adapt the hinge 3 to a vast range of doors, even with weights that are very different to one another.
In other words, use of the friction means 27 allows an increase in the absolute value of the difference between the torques for “opening” and “closing” the door 3, a value which, as already indicated, in practice defines the versatility of the hinge, that is to say, the range of different door weights that a predetermined hinge can balance.
Advantageously, the positioning of the friction element 22 in the housing 26, with its lateral projections 24a, 24b detached from the longitudinal walls 6a and 6b, means that nothing hinders door 3 closing. Therefore, when the door 3 is closed, the elastic energy of the second spring 16 is not dissipated by the friction means 27 and so can fully contribute to hermetic closing of the door 3.
According to an alternative embodiment of the hinge disclosed, not illustrated, the opposite longitudinal walls 6a, 6b of the second element 6 are made in such a way that they converge towards the pin 10, at least over one stretch of their longitudinal extension. In that way, advantageously there is an increase in the friction force developed between the walls 6a, 6b and the friction element 22 when passing from the door 3 closed position to the open position.
The invention described above is susceptible of industrial application and may be modified and adapted in several ways without thereby departing from the scope of the inventive concept. Moreover, all details of the invention may be substituted by technically equivalent elements.
| Number | Date | Country | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| BO2007 A000110 | Feb 2007 | IT | national |
