The present invention relates to continuous hinges for use with architectural doors and frames. More particularly the invention relates to forming hinge leaves for continuous hinges to facilitate and improve their secure attachment with threaded fasteners by stiffening the metal leaves of such hinges through embossing or other means to produce a unique surface structure. The invention further relates to a hinge leaf fastener hole configuration and structure, and methods for forming the same, to optimize the choice of fasteners and improve the strength of such holes. These features will facilitate interchangeability of the invention with other continuous hinges, in both new and hinge replacement applications by providing a hinge that may be made to fit industry standard door opening clearance gaps. Other advantages of the invention include providing the means to make hinges that are more fire-resistant, less prone to shipping damage, and visually more appealing.
Hinges that are continuous, i.e., hinges that attach a door to its frame or to another door for a substantial part of the length of the joined portions, are well known. Such hinges take various forms, including hinges which are formed from sheet metal by stamping and curling “knuckles”, or essentially cylindrical receptacles, along the length of a strip which will accept a longitudinal pin, wire or rod. The knuckles are separated by spaces of generally equal length so that the opposing knuckles of a second hinge member may be interposed between the knuckles of the first hinge member and joined by the pin, wire or rod. Such hinges are commonly known as “piano” hinges, and are used, in addition to pivoting the covers for piano keyboards, for building athletic lockers, furniture, equipment enclosures and for building architectural doors and frames, or wherever a secure hinging system is required. U.S. Pat. No. 5,991,975, which is incorporated herein by reference, describes a hinge of this type, which has been improved by a variety of means to mechanically articulate a covering member to enhance its appearance as well as to improve its protection from environmental deterioration and other hazards.
Another form of continuous hinge, described in U.S. Pat. No. 3,402,422, which is incorporated herein by reference, teaches a continuous hinge with two hinge members rotatably mounted about the edges of a C-shaped, elongated clamp that defines an internal channel. Gear segments at the edges of the hinge members are meshed with each other to pivotably connect the hinge members. One or more thrust bearings disposed in recesses of both hinge members prevent relative movement of the hinge members along their axes of rotation. The bearings occupy most of the cross-sectional spaces within the clamp and have bearing surfaces on their ends that are generally parallel to, abut, and support the recess end surfaces of the hinge member recesses. Another configuration of a continuous hinge is taught in U.S. Pat. No. 4,999,879, which is incorporated herein by reference, discloses hinge members with gear segments meshed with the clamp instead of, or in addition to, being meshed with each other.
The continuous hinges described above are characterized by hinge leaf members that are substantially flat so as to lie flush with the hinged objects (e.g., door, door frame and jamb, etc.) to which they are mounted. FIGS. 1A-C depict such a typical flat hinge leaf configuration. These flat hinge leaves, however, may lack sufficient strength and are prone to warpage and damage when made of relatively thin material, such as sheet steel. Due to the thinness of the material, they also may not be usable with standard fasteners used in the door hinge industry, such as No. 12 flat top, conical head self-tapping screws (either full or undercut head designs), and require special fasteners or modification of standard fastener offerings. The dimensions for such standard No. 12 screws are established per American Society of Mechanical Engineers National Standard ASME B18.6.4-1998, entitled “Thread Forming and Thread Cutting Tapping Screws and Metallic Drive Screws (Inch Series),” issued Dec. 31, 1999.
Some of the continuous hinges of the kinds described above have gained wide acceptance in the building construction industry. However, because of the variety of materials and processes used in their fabrication, together with their widespread availability from different sources, little attention has been given to interchangeability from one manufacturer's offerings to another, or between different choices of hinge leaf material such as aluminum or steel. Because of its typically greater strength, steel leaves can be made thinner than their aluminum counterparts that must be made thicker to achieve comparable strength. This is particularly important in industrial and commercial door installations with tall (sometimes 9 feet or more high) and heavy doors where strong hinges are required. Because extruded aluminum hinges are typically less expensive, they have become somewhat of the industry standard for continuous hinges, except where building codes require fire resistant door installations (as discussed below) or other considerations require selection of thinner steel hinges. As shown in
Differences in resistance to the effects of fire and other operational hazards between continuous hinges that may be manufactured of different materials has made it difficult to exchange or replace hinges with others more suitable for a particular location in a building or for a different operating requirement. Hinges made of steel are more fire resistant, but hinges made of aluminum, while less so, are cheaper but have thicker leaves. Frequently, misinterpretation of complex building codes by architects and designers results in the installation of new hinges made of the wrong material (e.g., aluminum), or changes in building codes require the replacement of existing aluminum hinges with steel hinges that meet the more stringent fire rating criteria so that the lunge installation can be brought up to code.
The consequences of upfront errors by architects and designers that may occur in the specification of a particular hinge for a particular door assembly in new building construction or retrofit applications may be also be severe. Unlike separate hinges, known as “butt” hinges or mortise hinges that can be inlaid into the jamb or rabbet of a door frame and into the hinged edge of a door, continuous hinges are generally applied to the surfaces of the jamb and door edge. This requires that a space or clearance gap of sufficient width is provided between the door and its frame to accept the thickness of the two hinge members that form the continuous hinge assembly. As discussed above, if the continuous hinge is manufactured from aluminum extrusions, for example, the required leaf thickness may be far greater than is needed if the hinge members are fabricated from sheet steel in order to achieve the proper support for doors of equal weight and service requirements. This has often meant that the clearance allowance for such doors and frames must be determined by the architect or builder only after the selection of the continuous hinge has been made. Frequently, the hinge specification must be changed during the construction sequence, because different hinge materials may be required for compliance with fire or other complex regulations, or must be changed during the useful life of the building because various building codes may be changed, or because the building may be used for subsequent, unanticipated purposes which require such changes. As can be appreciated, continuous hinges which vary in thickness simply because of their materials of construction can create costly delays in the construction sequence and costly replacements of improperly sized frames and doors when errors in specification occur.
The present invention advantageously addresses these hinge replacement or substitution issues for the first time with a thin leaf hinge design that can be made to fit into substantially the same standard 5/16 inch clearance gap that is allowed for cheaper aluminum hinges. Current thin leaf hinges that are commercially available offer no such comparable interchangeability, resulting in the costly substitution of a new door and/or frame to meet the clearance requirements of alternate hinging systems.
Another difficulty arises in the fastening of continuous hinges to their doors and frames. To avoid making the requisite door-to-frame clearance excessive, countersunk flat head screws are used to minimize the projection of the screw heads above the surfaces of the hinge leaves. When hinges are manufactured of thick plates, as is done with short, mortised hinges (commonly known as “butt” hinges) or with thicker aluminum continuous hinge leaves, this is normally not a problem. The material is generally thick enough to provide a conical or other shaped recess that is sufficiently deep to accommodate the screw head within the thickness of the material. Accordingly, standard flat full conical head screws (see
If the screw heads are made the slightest bit thicker than the gauge of the hinge leaves, the screw head will “bottom” against the door or frame material before the leaf is forced and held tight against its supporting surface, resulting in a loose and weak hinge installation. Accordingly, the screw head thickness cannot exceed the thickness of the hinge member material, or the screw will not hold the hinge member tightly to the door or the frame. Because aluminum continuous hinge leaves are generally thicker than their steel counterparts, screw fasteners can be more robust in their design and construction, often allowing the use of standard flat conical head screws (see
As this invention advantageously provides with thinner metal leaves that are formed with a raised mounting portion to accept the screws, the foregoing difficulties are avoided. Not only can a thicker screw be used, but the countersunk hole can be formed with a reinforcement below the leaf that provides conical walls that are actually deeper than the gauge of the leaf material alone. Thus instead of a screw hole recess which has countersunk walls that are no deeper than the metal thickness, which limits the screw type to either small screws or screws with extremely undercut thin heads, either of which can easily be pulled through the screw hole opening, a more robust screw head design can be employed that will take full advantage of a more fully formed countersink and standard fasteners.
The handling and shipping of continuous hinges presents yet another problem. Hinges fabricated of steel sheet metal in long lengths are easily bowed, dented, and bent during their shipment, handling at the jobsite, or during installation. Yet another disadvantage of sheet metal hinges is difficulty in maintaining proper appearance after installation, because the screw tension at widely separated screw locations along the length of each hinge member distorts the material, producing highly visible waviness and unsightly reflections in the finished installation. This is particularly unacceptable for commercial installations. Thus there is a need for a thin leaf hinge that addresses these leaf distortion problems.
The present invention advantageously addresses these problems by providing a multi-level or -planar hinge leaf having raised mounting portions which act to stiffen the leaves, thereby reducing the actual distortion and masking the remaining distortion produced by the fasteners (especially if the fasteners are applied with non-uniform pressure typical of on-site building construction practices with hand-held tools).
Equally important is the screw hole forming technique itself. With thin gauge hinge leaf materials, the screw holes can be punched, but a secondary operation is often required to machine a bevel around the rim of the hole to accept the conical edge of a flat head screw. Otherwise, only those types of screws which have a head that projects above the surface of the hinge leaf could be employed, making the installation both unsightly and producing a wide gap between the hinges leaves in the closed position. In other manufacturing techniques, a slightly beveled rim can be stamped around the edge of each hole, but the depth and conformity to the screw head design is limited by the extremely high forces required in “coining” these edges and the durability of the forming punches to withstand the pressures needed to produce metal flow within the material thickness of the leaves. Moreover, these limits of press-formed conical shapes require that the initial hole be initially stamped to a much larger diameter than the body or shank of the screw would normally otherwise require, because the limited ability of the metal to flow into a conical shape limits the bevel to the outer edges of the hole. Flat head countersunk screws contact such screw holes around their outer edges only, creating hinge leaf screw pull-through problems when the leaf is being fastened to a hinged object and screw breakage because of the leverage effect between the outer edges of severely undercut thin-headed screws and their sharp edged (stress concentration notch) transition to the screw body. Thus there is a need for an improved method of forming fastener holes in hinge leaves.
The leaf design of the present invention advantageously allows fastener holes to be punched through thin gauge leaves, and then formed into a conical recess which can be much deeper than the gauge of the material by creating a reinforcement below the screw hole on the underside of the leaf. This forming process can be done in one or more steps as appropriate, and utilizes embossing, or deformation, as opposed to machining or coining. The depth of such countersinks allows the use of standard screws with thicker, stronger heads. In addition, the formation of holes of this kind inherently work-hardens the hinge leaf in the area of the deformation, producing a ring of toughened material to help prevent screw pull-through.
Another advantage of the raised or embossed hinge leaf design is the formation of a recess or cavity on the underside of each leaf (between the leaf and hinged object) which can be filled with intumescent fire-resistant materials. These materials, in the presence of extreme heat, such as occurs in building fires, swell to many times their original thickness. They can be applied in the form of a coating or paste within the recess of the ribbing or embossing without any additional space required for application. In the presence of fire, each leaf will be pressed outward from the surface of the door or frame to which it is fastened, which can create an effective fire barrier by wedging the door tightly against the jamb on the opposing side of the door. Because widely accepted fire testing procedures (see National Fire Protection Association Code 80 Testing) do not require doors to operate at the conclusion of a fire test, such wedging action takes full advantage of the strength of each component of the door and frame system by forcing the full length of each leaf against the other, which helps to form a fire seal as well as a mechanical wedge.
The present invention is generally directed to a longitudinally extending continuous hinge comprising specially formed leaves having a unique multi-level or -planar surface structure including a combination of raised and base portions. This offers the advantage of structurally stiffening the leaf allowing the use of thinner, stronger hinge leaf materials with improved strength and rigidity. Such thinner materials may preferably include steel which has superior fire resistance than aluminum which is commonly used for continuous hinges. The raised leaf portions further provide a recess or cavity on the underside of the leaves, and between the leaves and hinged objects when mounted thereto, to allow the creation of fuller depth, conically recessed screw holes than heretofore available. These cavities can also be filled with intumescent fire-resistant materials to improve the fire rating of the hinge. The present invention further provides interchangeability with existing industry standard continuous hinge door mounting clearances allowing hinge leaf materials to be easily switched without altering the door and frame. The present invention also allows the use of standard stronger fasteners without sacrificing attachment strength.
A hinge formed according to principles of the present invention comprises a first hinge member and a second hinge member pivotably connected together. In one embodiment, the hinge members each comprise knuckles and a leaf connected thereto to mount the respective hinge members to hinged objects. The knuckles of the first hinge member are interspersed between the knuckles of the second hinge member. A pin may be provided that runs through the knuckles of the first and second hinge members, thereby pivotably connecting the two hinge members.
In another embodiment, the first and second hinge members each have leaves with a longitudinally extending edge. The leaves are pivotably connected together along at least part of the longitudinally extending leaf edges by a longitudinally extending clamp. Preferably, the longitudinally extending leaf edges each have a gear segment which mesh together and are held in operable engagement with each other by the clamp. Also preferably, the clamp has two longitudinally extending edges that are inwardly inclined to engage the longitudinally extending edges of the hinge leaves.
In one embodiment, the leaves of at least one hinge member are formed with a raised surface structure that is multi-leveled or -planar. The leaf may comprise at least a first planar level surface and at least a second planar level surface. The first planar level surface may be adjacent the second planar level surface. The first planar level surface is at a first plane and the second planar level surface is at a second plane different than the first plane. In another embodiment, the first planar level surface may further comprise two or more discontiguous sections lying in the same first plane. The second planar level surface may further comprise two or more discontiguous portions lying in the same second plane. In one embodiment, the first planar level surface preferably abuts against or contacts a hinged object when the leaf member is mounted to the hinged object. The second planar level surface preferably does not abut or contact the hinged object directly.
In another embodiment, the leaves of each hinge member have a surface structure comprising a substantially flat or planar base portion and a raised or elevated mounting portion. At least a part of the raised mounting portion defines a substantially flat or planar surface that is displaced apart from, but generally parallel to and offset from the base portion. The raised portion comprises at least part of the surface area of the respective leaf of which it is part. In one embodiment, the raised portion is flanked on either side by narrow base portion sections. In another embodiment, the raised portion extends longitudinally along substantially the entire length of each leaf and defines longitudinally extending raised ribs or rails.
A hinge formed according to principles of the present invention further comprises each leaf having a plurality of fastener holes for mounting the hinge members to a hinged object. The holes preferably have a conical cross-sectional shape to allow the use of flat head conical mounting screws which are standard in the door hinge industry. Preferably, the fastener holes are located in the raised leaf portions described above; however, not all the holes need necessarily located in the raised portion. The holes in the raised portions preferably have a reinforcement on the underside of each leaf associated with each hole. The reinforcements, which may be annular or ring-like in configuration, preferably extend in a perpendicular direction outwards from the hole on the underside of the leaf. At least a portion of the reinforcement preferably defines a substantially flattened top for securely abutting a hinged object when the hinge member is mounted to the hinged object. Preferably, the hole reinforcements and the base portion or first planar level surface contact the hinged object when the hinge member is mounted thereto. The hole reinforcements add strength to the underside of the leaf and help prevent the fasteners from pulling through the leaf material when the leaf is mounted to a hinged object. The hole reinforcements also provides additional depth to the fastener hole allowing the use of standard fasteners to mount the leaf to a hinged object.
In a further embodiment, a plurality of raised portions or second planar level surfaces may be provided for each hinge member leaf. Preferably, the raised portion(s) or second planar level surface(s) are provided in at least the leaf areas containing fastener openings. The number, location, shapes, and dimensions of the raised portions or second planar level surfaces are a matter of design choice and not limited to those shown in the preferred embodiments disclosed herein.
A method of securing a hinge leaf to an object using fasteners is provided. In one embodiment, the method includes: placing a first hinge leaf against an object, the first leaf having a base portion with a substantially flat surface and a mounting portion having a surface offset and parallel to the base portion; the mounting portion further defining a cavity between the mounting portion and the object; inserting at least one conical flat head fastener through at least one hole defined by the mounting portion, the hole circumscribed by an annular reinforcement disposed in the cavity proximate to the hole, the mounting portion and reinforcement further defining a conical surface around the periphery of the hole; embedding the fastener in the object; and supporting a majority of a side of the conical head of the fastener against the conical surface. In another embodiment, the fastener is a standard No. 12 undercut conical flat head screw dimensioned per American Society of Mechanical Engineers National Standard ASME B18.6.4-1998, entitled “Thread Forming and Thread Cutting Tapping Screws and Metallic Drive Screws (Inch Series)” issued Dec. 31, 1999.
In yet another method of installing a hinge leaf to a hinged object, the method includes: forming a cavity between a hinge leaf and a hinged object; locating a conical fastener head having a depth in the cavity and hinge leaf, and supporting a majority of the depth of the conical fastener head in the leaf and cavity. In one embodiment, the conical fastener head has a depth of a standard No. 12 undercut conical flat head screw dimensioned per American Society of Mechanical Engineers National Standard ASME B18.6.4-1998, entitled “Thread Forming and Thread Cutting Tapping Screws and Metallic Drive Screws (Inch Series)” issued Dec. 31, 1999.
In one embodiment, a preferred method of making a hinge leaf is also provided. The method includes: forming a cavity in a hinge leaf having a thickness and an underside; forming at least one conical fastener hole through the leaf that communicates with the cavity; and reinforcing the underside of the leaf in the cavity around the hole. In another embodiment, the step of reinforcing the underside of the leaf includes locating at least one reinforcement having a thickness in the cavity proximate to the hole so that the combined leaf and reinforcement have a thickness greater than the thickness of the leaf alone.
In another embodiment, a method of fabricating a hinge leaf with reinforced holes capable of accepting a conical flat head fastener is provided. The method includes: forming a raised portion in the leaf having an underside to define a cavity therebelow; forming a hole with conical sidewalls in the raised portion configured to receive a conical head fastener for mounting the leaf to a hinged object; and deforming the raised portion at the hole to form an annular reinforcement on the underside of the raised portion around the hole in the cavity. In one embodiment, the steps of forming the hole and reinforcement are completed in a single machining step. In another embodiment, the hole and reinforcement are formed by embossing. In yet another embodiment, the step of forming the reinforcement further comprises forcing the raised portion into a die button placed on the underside of the raised portion. In one embodiment, the method further comprises the step of flattening a top of the reinforcement. In yet another embodiment, the step of forming the hole further comprises forming a conical sidewall on the hole.
In another embodiment, a method of malting a hinge leaf includes: forming a cavity in a hinge leaf having a thickness; forming at least one conical fastener hole in the leaf communicating with the cavity; and locating at least one reinforcement having a thickness in the cavity proximate to the hole so that the leaf and reinforcement have a combined total thickness at least about the same as a height of a head of a standard No. 12 undercut conical flat head screw dimensioned per American Society of Mechanical Engineers National Standard ASME B18.6.4-1998, entitled “Thread Forming and Thread Cutting Tapping Screws and Metallic Drive Screws (Inch Series)” issued Dec. 31, 1999.
The present invention and preferred embodiments will be further described in detail below with specific reference to the drawings provided herewith.
The features and advantages of the present invention will become more readily apparent from the following detailed description of the invention in which like elements are labeled similarly and in which:
FIGS. 1A-C depict prior art continuous hinges having flat leaves;
It should be recognized that while the present invention is described and illustrated with reference to particular preferred embodiments, the scope of the invention is not intended to be limited to such embodiments. Furthermore, the description of the invention the follows, and any references to orientation, configuration, direction, size, or materials, is intended primarily for convenience and does not limit the scope of the present invention.
The longitudinal direction is herein defined as extending in a direction generally parallel to the longitudinal axis LA along the length of the hinge 1, as shown in
Referring now to FIGS. 4A-C, there is shown an improved continuous hinge 1 according to a preferred embodiment of the invention. These Figures show the hinge 1 in various positions, including a closed position (
Hinge 1 comprises at least two hinge members 2, 3, each having knuckles or barrels 14, 15 and leaves 22, 23 connected thereto, respectively. Leaves 22, 23 each have an underside 100, 101 and topside 102, 103, respectively, and a length L (shown in
Preferably, at least one of the leaves 22, 23 has a multi-level or -planar surface structure as shown, and described in detail below. Leaves 22, 23 also have a plurality of fastener holes 18 (see also
Head depth D2 of screw 33 for a standard No. 12 undercut conical flat head screw dimensioned per above cited American Society of Mechanical Engineers National Standard ASME B18.6.4-1998, entitled “Tread Forming and Thread Cutting Tapping Screws and Metallic Drive Screws (Inch Series)” issued Dec. 31, 1999, may be from 0.078-0.092 inches. Correspondingly, depth D1 for a standard No. 12 full conical flat head screw dimensioned per the same standard may be a maximum of 0.132 inches.
The conical cross-section of hole 18 preferably extends through the leaf 23 and hole reinforcement 19 below, and is sized to be compatible with the size of the screw head to be used. Preferably, the total combined thickness or depth DT of the leaf 23 and hole reinforcement 19 is about the same as the thickness or height of the screw head in order to securely hold the leaf 23 to the hinged object 27. Also as shown in the figures, the thickness DT through combined raised mounting portion 5 of leaf 23 and reinforcement 19 accordingly is preferably greater than the thickness DL of leaf 23 alone (see, e.g.,
With additional reference to
Preferably, fastener hole 18 is formed by a punching operation which may use a compound punch to make the initial penetration through the leaf material and the conical hole shape in a single blow. Alternatively, separate operations may be used to make the initial penetration and shape the hole. It should be noted, however, that the hole 18 may be made in the leaf material by machining or other suitable means know in the art; however, a punching operation is typically more economical. Hole reinforcement 19 may be formed by placing a button on the bottom side of the hinge leaf during the punching operation, which in turn produces the reinforcement when hole 18 is being formed. In this case, reinforcement 19 is formed of the leaf material that is punched and deformed during the hole punching process. However, reinforcement 19 may be formed by other suitable means commonly used in the art. In addition, reinforcement 19 may be a separate component of suitable material and shape that is attached to the underside of hinge leaves by any suitable means commonly known in the art, such as by use of adhesives, welding, etc.
Although the preferred means for supporting a majority of side surfaces 107, 108 of screws 30, 33 described above is defined by mounting portion 5 of leaf 23 and reinforcement 19, any suitable structure may be used so long as the side surfaces 107, 108 are supported when at least a portion of the head 31, 34 of the applicable screw is in the cavity 28, as described further herein.
Referring again to FIGS. 4A-C, leaf 22 comprises a substantially flat base area or portion 24 and a substantially flat raised mounting area or portion 4. The raised mounting portion 4 comprises at least a part of leaf 22 and defines a substantially planar surface displaced apart and offset from, but parallel to base portion 24. Accordingly, the base portion 24 defines a first planar or level surface and raised portion 4 comprises a second planar or level surface. In the embodiment shown, raised portion 4 is configured as a plateau with a substantially flat top surface 40 that is raised above base portion 24, and portion 4 has a thickness substantially the same as the thickness DL as the rest of the leaf being formed from part of it. Leaf 24 has a width WL and raised portion 4 has a width WR as shown in
In the embodiment shown, raised portion 4 is flanked on either side by narrow base portion sections 6 and 8. Accordingly, in this embodiment, base portion 24 further comprises base portion sections 6 and 8 on either side of raised portion 4. Raised portion 4 has a pair of sidewalls 10, 12 which define a transition between the flat base portion 24 and the raised portion 4 of leaf 22. In the embodiment shown, sidewalls 10, 12 are angled or sloping with respect to the base portion 24. However, the sidewalls 10, 12 may be perpendicular to base portion 24 or of any other suitable shape.
Preferably, leaf 23 has a similar configuration as leaf 22, as shown, also comprising a flat base area or portion 25, raised mounting area or portion 5 with sidewalls 11 and 13, and narrow base portion sections 7 and 9 on either side of raised portion 5. However, depending on the specific installation configuration and requirements, which are numerous, it should be noted that leaf 23 may necessarily have a different configuration than leaf 22. Accordingly, one leaf need not comprise a multi-level or -planar surface at all, and may require simply a flat-type conventional hinge leaf. Such may be the case where one of the hinge members is mounted on the face of the door (not shown), in lieu of on the door edge between the door frame and door (see, e.g.; FIGS. 7A-D). Thus it will be appreciated that numerous combinations of leaf configurations are possible and the invention is not limited to pairs of hinge leaves having an identical configuration. On such example is an interlocking leaf design a shown in FIGS. 14A-B, and described below.
Referring now to
In the embodiment shown in
As shown in
Hinge members 2, 3 may be fabricated of any suitable material possessing sufficient strength and thickness for the intended operating conditions and service factors. Preferably, hinge members 2, 3 are made from steel sheet which is stamped, formed, and punched in a series of progressive manufacturing operations to create the leaves, knuckles, fastener holes, etc. Steel has superior material strength in contrast to aluminum which is a common material used for continuous hinges. Accordingly, a hinge 1 made according to the invention can be made of steel significantly thinner than a hinge made of aluminum. Preferably, the steel is about 0.075 inches thick. The hinge members 2, 3 may be made of stainless steel for improved corrosion resistance. The hinge members 2, 3 may also be fabricated of aluminum which is extruded, machined, relieved, and otherwise formed to produce the required hinge features.
FIGS. 7A-D depicts various hinge installations of the continuous hinge type generally shown FIGS. 4A-C.
Referring to
Leaf 80 (the underside of which is shown in
Leaf 81 (the topside of which is shown in
It will be appreciated that a continuous hinge formed according to principles of the present inventions may be used in a variety of applications where one object is intended to be pivotably mounted to another object. The invention will be particular advantageous for, but is not limited to, commercial and industrial door installations where the use of continuous hinges offers many advantages. Such installations may include door-to-frame and door-to-door mounts. Moreover, the present inventions may be used where more than two doors are to be pivotably connected together. Accordingly, the uses and applications of the present invention are not limited to those embodiments shown herein.
While the foregoing description and drawings represent the preferred embodiments of the present invention, it will be understood that various additions, modifications and substitutions may be made therein without departing from the spirit and scope of the present invention as defined in the accompanying claims. In particular, it will be clear to those skilled in the art that the present invention may be embodied in other specific forms, structures, arrangements, proportions, and with other elements, materials, and components, without departing from the spirit or essential characteristics thereof. One skilled in the art will appreciate that the invention may be used with many modifications of structure, arrangement, proportions, materials, and components and otherwise, used in the practice of the invention, which are particularly adapted to specific environments and operative requirements without departing from the principles of the present invention. The presently disclosed embodiments are therefore to be considered in all respects as illustrative and not restrictive, the scope of the invention being indicated by the appended claims, and not limited to the foregoing description.
This application claims the benefit of priority to U.S. Provisional Application No. 60/483,853 filed Jun. 30, 2003.
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind | 371c Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
PCT/US04/20870 | 6/30/2004 | WO | 12/20/2005 |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60483853 | Jun 2003 | US |