1. Field of Invention
The invention relates to a hinge assembly for use in a tandem pivot structure that has one or more tandem motion locks and a lock override. The hinge assembly is particularly suited for use in a reprographic device having two separately rotatable units provided in a piggyback fashion.
2. Description of Related Art
Printers, copiers, facsimiles and other reprographic products typically have a cover or structural housing that has to be pivoted open to gain access to internal components, such as for ink or toner replenishment, media jams, etc. Copiers and multifunctional printers and devices with printing, scanning and/or copying functions have additional requirements for pivoting covers. Such multifunction devices besides having printing mechanisms may also include scanning mechanisms and may have a feed unit with automatic document feeding mechanisms. The feed unit is normally oriented in a nearly horizontal position. Such feed units must be pivoted open to access a scanner platen glass for document copying or media jam recovery.
The feed unit may be tandemly coupled in piggyback fashion to a lower structure, which incorporates the scanner and also pivots. This lower scanner unit is also normally oriented in a nearly horizontal position. An example of this is shown in simplistic form in
If the lower scanner unit is intended to accommodate books with the upper feeder unit closed, a vertical slide or elevating range can be provided to accommodate the thickness of the book on the scanner unit. Such an elevating capability can create additional problems when the scanner unit is opened fully because now the feeder unit, if not restrained, can extend in translation backwards with undesired force and consequences, due to gravity and momentum.
When an unrestrained feeder unit 110 falls backwards due to pivot motion allowed by the first coupling hinge 120 or by unrestrained translation of an elevating slide, the feeder unit 110 can strike a wall behind the printer device 100, or a person walking behind it. Moreover, when the feeder unit 110 freely falls backwards, the feeder unit 110, first connecting hinge 120 and/or hinge mounting components can be bent or damaged.
All of these problems are brought about due to integration of functions added to printers when they require multipurpose functionality. User interface unpredictability can also be part of the problem. Users of the device may ignore motion tendencies of the various cover mechanisms they are opening. The propensity to be casual and inattentive when opening and handling of the various device units being pivoted can lead to yet another problem. The hinge may not be opened far enough to optimally accomplish the desired task, such as jam removal or ink replenishment.
Accordingly, structures for accommodating tandem pivoting units may suffer from various problems.
In accordance with a first aspect of the invention, at least one motion lock is provided on the upper piggybacked unit of a tandem unit to prevent the upper unit from falling away from the lower unit when it is tandemly coupled to the lower unit and the lower unit is pivoted to a non-horizontal position.
In various exemplary embodiments, this aspect is achieved using a gravity dependent lock mechanism. Moreover, in a preferred embodiment, the lock is self-actuating and self-releasing upon sufficient pivoting of the upper and lower units.
In various exemplary embodiments, the motion lock prevents rotational movement of the upper unit relative to the lower unit. In other various exemplary embodiments, the motion lock prevents translatory motion of the upper unit relative to the lower unit. In a preferred embodiment, motion locks are provided that prevent both rotational and translatory movement of the upper unit relative to the lower unit. In a more preferred embodiment, the motion locks are automatically enabled or disabled so that no special knowledge or action on the part of the user is required to return the hinge to normal operation.
In various exemplary embodiments a hinge pivot motion lock for a hinge that tandemly couples an upper unit to a lower unit will automatically inhibit pivot motion of the upper unit as the lower unit is pivoted into an intermediate range of positions between a first position (e.g., a closed position) and a second position. Moreover, the motion lock will automatically disengage and allow the upper unit to pivot freely when the lower unit is oriented at or near the first position, such as a closed substantially horizontal position.
This motion lock solution, however, may lead to another problem. When the large geometry of the typical media feed mechanism forming the upper unit is grasped by a user, the leverage advantage and torque that can be applied in opposition to a locking position that is near a pivot center of the hinge can be tremendous. Users are not very likely to intentionally open the unit with excessive force. However, because of this leverage, the unit could inadvertently be opened with force that would otherwise damage or break the lock mechanism locking the hinge to a vertical position. This may break the hinge mount or other components of the device.
In accordance with a second aspect of the invention, a lock override mechanism is provided to reduce or prevent the above problem. Such a lock override mechanism allows the lock to yield to excessive force without causing damage. In a preferred embodiment, the lock enable condition is automatically reset after the override condition so that no special knowledge or action on the part of the user is required to return the hinge to normal operation.
In exemplary embodiments, the motion locks are provided on a reprographic device, such as a copier, facsimile, printer or multifunction device having an upper unit that forms a sheet feeder unit, a lower unit that forms a scan housing, and a fixed base below the lower unit that may contain a marking engine.
In accordance with a further aspect of the invention, the various motion locks and/or override mechanisms are provided inside an exterior housing of the hinge assembly so that, with a cursory glance, the hinge assembly has the outward visual appearance of an ordinary hinge. Besides improved aesthetics, this elimination of external linkages, release catches, etc. can remove sources of potential interference that would otherwise impede proper operation of the device, and can improve product safety.
Various exemplary embodiments will be described in detail, with reference to the following figures, wherein:
The upper pivoting unit 210 may form an upper feeder unit having an auto feeding module that advances a recording media, such as paper, past a scanning head or scan platen. In an exemplary embodiment, the lower pivoting unit 220 forms a lower scan unit that contains the scanner platen. The scanned images can be reproduced by a marking engine provided in, for example, base 230.
First coupling hinge assembly 300 allows rotational movement of upper pivot unit 210 between a substantially horizontal closed position (
One important feature of this is shown in
With reference to
A problem arises that during the opening of the lower unit (i.e., movement to a non-horizontal position), the elevator slide mechanism 600 may be inadvertently translated due to gravity, inertia and the like. To prevent this from occurring, another aspect of the invention provides a second motion lock 700 that constrains translational movement of the elevator slide 600 (i.e., substantially limits or prevents unconstrained movement in the direction of the arrow) when the lower scan unit 220 is moved to a non-horizontal position. Second motion lock may also allow some limited degree of motion to occur before engagement. The second motion lock 700 will be described later in more detail with reference to
With reference to
With reference to the preceding Figures, the first coupling hinge assembly 300 and/or hinge assembly 400 may be a counter balance style spring loaded hinge that is capable of retaining the unit open in intermediate positions by a designed counterbalance of spring force relative to weight and geometry. Either unit 210 or 220 may be capable of self-bias towards the open position (auto-open) when the unit is positioned sufficiently close to the open position. Additional features will be described with reference to
Lower housing 305 includes an upper surface that forms a cam profile 350 with a suitable cam contour to guide cam follower 320 and control the movement of the upper housing 310 of hinge assembly 300 relative to the lower housing 305. Additional details of the cam profile will be described later with respect to
Lower housing 305 is preferably hollow and contains a first motion lock 500 substantially within its interior confines. First motion lock 500 includes a motion lock housing 510 that is pivotally mounted within lower housing 305 by pivot shaft 550 provided in the lower half of lock housing 510. First motion lock 500 is designed to be oriented in a first position remote from the gear assembly when the lower housing 305 is substantially vertically oriented. However, when the lower housing is tilted in a first direction, the motion lock assembly pivots into a second position in which it engages one or more components of the gear assembly 335 to lock the upper housing 310 from rotation relative to the lower housing 305, as will be described in further detail below.
A second motion lock 700 is also provided in lower housing 305 and includes a body element comprised of a lower body portion 710 and an upper body portion 730 pivotally mounted on a pivot shaft 720. The lower body is shaped, weighted or otherwise configured to be heavier than the upper body.
A more detailed explanation of the hinge assembly 300 will be described with reference to
A preferred embodiment uses gear 335 provided on hinge pivot shaft 340 that is engaged by a pivot lock 540 of the spring-loaded pivot arm 520 when the hinge is pivoted at an elevated angle best viewed in
The upper unit is rotatable between closed and fully opened positions, which may be defined by the configuration of cam profile 350 and associated cam follower 320, which may include a cam follower surface 322. Additionally, by selection of a suitable spring force range for spring 315, the hinge assembly can be of the counter balance type that can retain the assembly positioned in an intermediate position, such as the position shown in
As also shown in
When the lower unit 220 is positioned in a non-horizontal orientation, however, as shown in
Thus, the upper feeder unit 210 can be prevented from sliding outwardly or extending when the lower scan unit 220 is raised through use of a pivoting weighted pawl serving as second motion lock 700. However, to retain elevator operation when the lower scan unit 220 is closed using a gravity-actuated pivot, the pivot lock is inhibited merely by return of the lower scan unit 220 to the closed position. Multiple catches or teeth 620 are preferably provided to prevent further elevation motion should the feeder unit 210 be partially elevated when the scanner unit 220 is lifted.
Additionally, while the lower scan unit 220 is in a non-horizontal orientation, the first motion lock 500 automatically engages. Again, actuation may be gravity fed, with the center of gravity of the pivot automatically moving the first motion lock into engagement with gear 335 when the lower scan unit 220 is rotated. In a preferred embodiment, pivot lock 540 is shaped so as to be received between adjacent teeth of gear 335. This will lock the gear 335 from further rotation, which locks the upper feeder unit 210 from rotation as well. Spring 560 provides a sufficient force on the pivot arm 520 to restrain the pivot lock 540 in engagement with gear 335 against gravitational and casual user induced rotational forces on the upper pivoting unit 210.
Thus, whenever the lower scan unit 220 is rotated, the upper feeder unit 210 can be automatically locked from independent rotation. Accordingly, the upper unit is at least partially dependent on the orientation of the lower unit.
An additional feature will be described with reference to
A number of methods of accomplishing the lock and override can be used. One solution is to use opposing plates with a series of radial beveled “teeth” that are held in contact by spring loading one plate against the other. When sufficient rotation force is applied to the pivotal plate, it cams out of contact with the stationary plate, resulting in a desired override. However, this requires a linkage between a stationary frame and the pivoting structure of the hinge such that the plate engagement does not occur until the lower scan housing 220 is pivoted an elevated distance for actuation.
Another method eliminates the need for connections outside the hinge by using a pivoting mass internal to the hinge assembly 300 that gravitationally actuates the mechanism as the structure pivots upward. This is shown in
Another solution is to use a toggle and slide friction lock that similarly yields to sufficiently high force loads to accomplish the override. The toggle is brought into contact or held away from contact with the slider by the pivoting weight to engage or release the lock. This can be further refined by inclusion of a high force spring loading back up plate that limits slide force to provide a specific force window for the override slippage.
Ideally, the various locks and override structure are incorporated into the hinge itself, so that external linkages, manual release latches and catches that would otherwise interfere with operation of the device, such as copying or “original” document placement, can occur without obstruction. Thus, it is preferable that the various motion locks are internal to the hinge and neatly incorporated into an “envelope” formed from the various hinge component housings.
An exemplary hinge assembly 300 is of the detent and counterbalance type that provides detent, counterbalancing and motion/mass control functions as better shown in
The intermediate position defined as the counterbalance range 356 is preferably provided with a cam profile and spring force that counterbalances the weight and leverage of the upper unit so that the unit can be left at an intermediate position without requiring a user force for retention. That is, the hinge assembly is designed at this position to approximately neutralize the force of gravity so the unit will remain stationary if there are no external stabilizing or motion forces.
It is further preferable to provide the auto open range 358 with a cam profile complementary to the spring force that provides an urging force to bias the upper pivoting unit toward the fully open position 360. This provides an operator with tactile feedback that assists in positioning of the pivoting unit to the full intended open position 360. The urging force does not have to be so strong that it achieves full open functionality without further user assistance, but results in at least a lessening of the urging force needed by the operator to open the unit.
The numeric range for the various positions can be determined based on user preference and device-specific constraints. All functions or any number of combinations of functions described may be employed in the hinge or omitted depending on the mass and desired function of the units involved.
While aspects of the invention have been described in conjunction with the exemplary embodiments outlined above, various alternatives, modifications, variations, and/or improvements, whether known or that are, or may be, presently unforeseen, may become apparent. Accordingly, the exemplary embodiments of the invention as set forth above are intended to be illustrative, not limiting. Various changes may be made without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention. Therefore, the systems and methods described are intended to embrace all known, or later-developed, alternatives, modifications, variations, and/or improvements.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4520977 | Holzhauser et al. | Jun 1985 | A |
4556308 | Hoppner et al. | Dec 1985 | A |
4742598 | Bruneau | May 1988 | A |
4814817 | Nishijima et al. | Mar 1989 | A |
5003347 | Kameda | Mar 1991 | A |
5060019 | Fukunaga | Oct 1991 | A |
5162846 | Cahill | Nov 1992 | A |
5265310 | Ichinokawa | Nov 1993 | A |
5361184 | El-Sharkawi et al. | Nov 1994 | A |
5564163 | Lowry et al. | Oct 1996 | A |
6092847 | Kwan | Jul 2000 | A |
6175990 | Kato et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6243884 | Simonson | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6427500 | Weinerman et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6499189 | Kondo et al. | Dec 2002 | B2 |
6510301 | Tanaka | Jan 2003 | B2 |
6615019 | Fujimoto | Sep 2003 | B2 |
7299525 | Chang | Nov 2007 | B2 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2003005309 | Jan 2003 | JP |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20060130277 A1 | Jun 2006 | US |