The accompanying drawings illustrate implementations of the concepts conveyed in the present document. Features of the illustrated implementations can be more readily understood by reference to the following description taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings. Like reference numbers in the various drawings are used wherever feasible to indicate like elements. Further, the left-most numeral of each reference number conveys the FIG. and associated discussion where the reference number is first introduced.
The present concepts relate to devices, such as computing devices employing determinative hinge assemblies that can rotationally secure first and second device portions relative to a first hinge axis that relates to the first portion and a second hinge axis that relates to the second portion. The determinative hinge assembly can define which angles of rotation occur relative to which hinge axis. For instance, 0 to 90 degree rotation may occur around one hinge axis, 91-270 degrees may occur around the other hinge axis, and 271 degrees to 360 degrees may occur around the former hinge axis, for example. Traditionally, at certain angles of rotation, the first and second portions might contact one another. This contact can damage elements of either or both of the first and second portions. The determinative hinge assembly can solve this issue by moving the first and/or second portions away from one another at relative orientations where the contact is likely to occur to lessen and/or avoid this contact and thus avoid damaging contact forces that would otherwise be imparted on the first and second portions.
Introductory
The first portion 102 can include opposing first and second surfaces 118 and 120, which can be parallel to one another. Similarly, the second portion 104 can include opposing first and second surfaces 122 and 124, which can be parallel to one another. In some implementations the first and/or second surfaces 118, 122, 120, and/or 124 can be planar surfaces. In some implementations, displays 126 can be positioned on the first and/or second surfaces. In this case, displays 126(1) and 126(2) are positioned on first surfaces 118 and 122, respectively.
As mentioned,
Note that while obscured by the displays 126, several electronic components, such as circuit boards, processors, and/or storage/memory can be secured to the first and second portions 102 and/or 104.
The processor can generate the GUIs 130 for presentation on the displays 126. In some implementations, the processor may generate different GUIs for the displays when the first and second portions 102 and 104 are in some orientations and a single GUI for a combined presentation in other orientations. For instance, when the first and second portions are oriented at 90 degrees relative to one another, the processor may generate a first GUI for presentation on the first portion and a second GUI for presentation on the second portion. When the first and second portions are oriented to 180 degrees, the processor can generate a single GUI that is collectively presented across both displays to create a larger display area. In other orientations, such as the alarm clock orientation, the same GUI may be presented on both the first and second portions. For instance, the time could be presented on both portions so that it is visible from more positions around the device. Thus, the processor can control the GUIs based upon the relative angle of the first and second portions.
Stated another way, in some configurations, the first surfaces 118 and 122 can be manifest as displays 126, such that in the open-book orientation of
Axis of rotation (e.g., hinge axes) 116(1) can be defined by a hinge pin 206(1) associated with a communication member 208 and axis of rotation 116(2) can be defined by another hinge pin 206(2). The communication member 208 can also be associated with a cover 210.
In some implementations, rotation around the first hinge axis 116(1) and/or the second hinge axis 116(2) may be selectively locked and unlocked, such as by the use of sliders 212 and associated followers 214. In this case, followers 214(1) and 214(2) are positioned on slider 212(1) and follower 214(3) is positioned on slider 212(2).
The determinative hinge assembly 106 can include cams 216 associated with the first body 202 and/or the second body 204. In this example, the first body 202 includes three cams 216(1), and the second body 204 includes three cams 216(2). Individual cams are not designated with specificity relative to
The cams 216 may have a pattern of low areas and/or high areas to allow or urge an individual follower 214 to move relative to an individual hinge pin 206 during rotation of the determinant hinge assembly 106. This aspect is described in more detail below relative to
In this implementation, sliders 212 can includes apertures 218 through which the hinge pins 206 can pass. In the illustrated configuration hinge pin 206(1) passes through aperture 218(1) in slider 212(1) and aperture 218(3) in slider 212(2). Similarly, hinge pin 206(2) passes through aperture 218(2) in slider 212(1) and aperture 218(4) in slider 212(2).
Individual apertures 218 can be elongate such that a width W of the aperture is approximately equal or slightly larger than a diameter D of the received hinge pin 206 while a length L of the aperture is substantially greater than the hinge pin diameter. (In order to reduce clutter on the drawing page, the diameter D, length L, and width W are labeled in only one instance on the drawing page of
Note that in the illustrated implementation the apertures 218 have approximately equal lengths. In other implementations, the apertures 218(1) and 218(2) of the slider 212(1) can be different lengths from apertures 218(3) and 218(4) of slider 212(2). From one perspective, the sliders 212, followers 214, and cams 216 can control whether rotation at a given relative angle occurs around hinge axis 116(1) or hinge axis 116(2). Thus, the sliders 212, followers 214, and cams 216 can be viewed as a rotation-determining sub-assembly 220.
The determinative hinge assembly 106 can further include an angle-specific portion-spacing sub-assembly 222. The function of the angle-specific portion-spacing sub-assembly 222 can relate to reducing and/or avoiding contact between the first and second device portions 102 and 104 during a range of rotation of the device. In some implementations, angle-specific portion-spacing sub-assembly 222 can include one or more cams 224 and associated cam followers 226. In the illustrated implementation, cams 224(1) and 224(2) are integrated into communication member 208. In other implementations, cams 224 can be freestanding elements.
Cams 224(1) and 224(2) interact with associated cam followers 226(1) and 226(2) that are secured to first portion 102 and second portion 104, respectively by fasteners 228(1) and 228(2). Additional fasteners 228(3) and 228(4) slidably secure the first and second bodies 202 and 204 to the first and second portions 102 and 104 via elongate apertures 230(1) and 230(2) and 230(3) and 230(4), respectively. To avoid clutter on the drawing page, not all fasteners 228 are illustrated. Further, alternative or additional fasteners 228 can be employed.
As mentioned, the first and second bodies 202 and 204 can be slidably secured to the first and second portions 102. Further, the first and/or second bodies 202 and 204 can be resiliently biased relative to the first and second portions 102 and 104 by biasing elements. In this case the biasing elements can be manifest as springs 232. For example, in the illustrated implementation, springs 232 can be positioned between the portions and the bodies. In this example springs 232(1) are positioned between the first portion 102 and the first body 202 and springs 232(2) are positioned between the second portion 104 and the second body 204.
The springs 232 can resiliently bias the first and second portions 102 and 104 toward one another as indicated by arrows 234(1) and 234(2). Viewed another way, the springs can resiliently bias the first and second portions toward their respective hinge axes 116. At individual angles, the angle-specific portion-spacing sub-assembly 222 can overcome this bias and force the first and second portions apart from one another to prevent the two portions from crashing into and damaging one another. This aspect is illustrated and described in more detail below relative to
In some implementations, communication member 208 may have one or more wires and/or cables extending therethrough, or, in other implementations, may provide a direct electrical contact through which the determinative hinge assembly 106 may have electrical communication between the first portion 102 and second portion 104, or electronic components connected thereto. Data and/or electrical communication through the communication member 208 may allow electricity and/or data to be sent across the determinative hinge assembly 106 between, for example, a display 126 (
In other implementations, first and second communication members 208 may be positioned in the determinative hinge assembly 106. The first communication member and second communication member may have one or more wires and/or cables extending between them or, in other implementations, a direct electrical contact between the first communication member and second communication member may allow electrical communication between the first communication member and second communication member. Data and/or electrical communication through the first communication member and second communication member may allow electricity and/or data to be sent across the determinative hinge assembly 106 between, for example, display (126(1),
Thus, to summarize the zero degree orientation, springs 232 are biasing first and second portions 102 and 104 toward hinge axes 116. Cam followers 226 are in low areas (e.g., recesses) 404 on cams 224 and as such are not countering the springs 232 so the springs are extending to a length Le (extended length) and biasing the first and second portions toward the hinge axes. Further, rotation around hinge axis 116(1) is locked by cam 216(1)C while rotation around hinge axis 116(2) is unlocked.
Further, cam engagement surface 406(2) of cam follower 226(2) is now contacting a high area 402(2) of cam 224(2) rather than a low area 404(2). As such, cam follower 226(2) and thereby second portion 104 are forced away from axis of rotation 116(2) as indicated by arrow 500. This movement compresses spring 232(2) as shown by length Lc (compressed length) which is shorter than the extended length Le of
Some implementations can be viewed from the perspective that a highest likelihood of contact and damage between the first and second portions 102 and 104 in the range from zero to 90 degrees occurs at around 45 degrees. In these implementations, cam 224 can have a profile such that the peak displacement of cam 224 at high area 402 is also at around 45 degrees and tapers down in both directions toward zero degrees and 90 degrees. This profile can be repeated for multiple quadrants (e.g., 45 degrees, 135 degrees, 225 degrees, 315 degrees).
In review, rotation-determining sub-assembly 220 can control the order of rotation around individual hinge axes 116. In this example, rotation from zero degrees to 90 degrees occurred around second hinge axis 116(2), rotation from 91 degrees to 270 degrees occurred around hinge axis 116(1), and rotation from 271 to 360 returned to hinge axis 116(2). The angle-specific portion-spacing sub-assembly 222 can contribute to spacing the first and second portions apart during rotation when they are likely to contact one another and cause damage. This generally occurs at non-parallel and non-perpendicular orientations (e.g., oblique angles).
From one perspective, some implementations can relate to a double-sided clamshell device comprised of first and second portions. In some configurations, the device can be square when viewed from the side (such as in
In some implementations, cam followers 226 can be integrated into each device portion and can be hard mounted to the portion's chassis or housing so they move as a unit. The cams 224 can be a part of the hinge that is between the two device portions. The hinges can be mounted to each chassis with a single degree of freedom. The hinge to chassis interface can be manifest as a slider interface. Springs 232 or other biasing element can serve to draw the hinges into the chassis. This biasing can create a pressure interface between the cam follower in the chassis and the cams within the hinge. Fully determinant motion can be achieved through the use of the cam lock hinge (e.g., rotation-determining sub-assembly) which can ensure a single active pivot at any given time and a spring-biased cam-cam follower interface (e.g., angle-specific portion-spacing sub-assembly 222) that controls relative spacing between the portions and their respective hinge axes 116.
The present concepts can provide several valuable aspects to device design to improve appearance and performance of folding devices. One of these aspects can relate to a cam profile that includes alternating high and low areas, such as the cloverleaf shaped pattern or arrangement of cams 224, which can allow cam follower 226 that is biased using springs 232 to determine device separation through the range of articulation. The cam profile can provide separation where damage is likely to occur, such as at acute and obtuse angles and detents to allow spring control at other angles, such as at 0, 180, 270 and 360 degrees, for example.
Various device examples are described above. Additional examples are described below. One example includes a device comprising a first portion and a second portion and a determinative hinge assembly that rotatably secures the first and second portions around first and second hinge axes through a set of relative angles of rotation. The determinative hinge assembly comprises a rotation-determining sub-assembly that controls whether sub-sets of rotation between the first and second portions occur around the first hinge axis or the second hinge axis. The determinative hinge assembly further comprises an angle-specific portion-spacing sub-assembly that forces the first and second portions apart from one another at individual angles within the sub-sets.
Another example can include any of the above and/or below examples where the rotation-determining sub-assembly comprises a first cam positioned around the first hinge axis and an opposing second cam positioned around the second hinge axis.
Another example can include any of the above and/or below examples where the device further comprises a follower interposed between the first cam and the second cam.
Another example can include any of the above and/or below examples where the first cam is manifest on a first body that is secured to the first portion with a single degree of freedom orthogonal to the first hinge axis.
Another example can include any of the above and/or below examples where the device further comprises a biasing element that resiliently biases the first portion toward the first axis along the single degree of freedom.
Another example can include any of the above and/or below examples where the angle-specific portion-spacing sub-assembly comprises a first cam positioned on the first hinge axis and where the first portion includes a first cam follower that engages the first cam.
Another example can include any of the above and/or below examples where the cam comprises alternating high areas and low areas and where engagement of the high areas force the first portion away from the first hinge axis.
Another example can include any of the above and/or below examples where the high areas correspond to a multiple of 45 degrees of relative rotation within the set of relative angles of rotation.
Another example can include any of the above and/or below examples where the alternating high areas and low areas are arranged in a cloverleaf arrangement.
Another example can include any of the above and/or below examples where the angle-specific portion-spacing sub-assembly further comprises a second cam positioned on the second hinge axis and where the second portion includes a second cam follower that engages the second cam.
Another example can include any of the above and/or below examples where the sub-sets comprise a multiple of 90 degrees, and where the individual angles comprise oblique angles.
Another example can include any of the above and/or below examples where the rotation-determining sub-assembly resiliently biases the first portion toward the first hinge axis and resiliently biases the second portion toward the second hinge axis, and where the angle-specific portion-spacing sub-assembly overcomes the resilient bias and forces either the first portion away from the first hinge axis or the second portion away from the second hinge axis at individual oblique angles within the set of relative angles of rotation.
Another example can include a device comprising a first portion that defines a first hinge axis and is resiliently biased toward the first hinge axis and a second portion that defines a second hinge axis and is resiliently biased toward the second hinge axis. The device further comprises a first cam that operates relative to the first hinge axis and is slidably secured to the first portion and a second cam that operates relative to the second hinge axis and is slidably secured to the second portion, where when the first and second portions are oriented at an acute angle the second cam overcomes the resilient bias and forces the second portion away from the second hinge axis while the first cam allows the first portion to remain biased toward the first hinge axis, and where when the first and second portions are oriented at an obtuse angle the first cam overcomes the resilient bias and forces the first portion away from the first hinge axis while the second cam allows the second portion to be biased back toward the second hinge axis.
Another example can include any of the above and/or below examples where the device further comprises a third cam that controls whether rotation at individual angles occurs relative to the first hinge axis or the second hinge axis.
Another example can include any of the above and/or below examples where the third cam comprises a rotation-determining sub-assembly.
Another example can include any of the above and/or below examples where the third cam comprises sets of opposing cams that operate relative to the first and second axes.
Another example can include any of the above and/or below examples where the first cam and the second cam comprise an angle-specific portion-spacing sub-assembly.
Another example can include a device comprising a first portion that includes a first display and a second portion that includes a second display. The device further comprises a determinative hinge assembly that rotatably secures the first and second portion around first and second hinge axes through a range of rotation and controls rotation around the first hinge axis to a first sub-set of the range of rotation and controls rotation around the second hinge axis to a second sub-set of the range of rotation, and where the determinative hinge assembly forces the first and second portions away from one another during a third sub-set of the rotation that is different than the first and second sub-sets.
Another example can include any of the above and/or below examples where the first sub-set comprises 0 degrees to 90 degrees and 271 degrees to 360 degrees.
Another example can include any of the above and/or below examples where the second sub-set comprises 91 degrees to 270 degrees.
Another example can include any of the above and/or below examples where the third sub-set comprises 45 degrees, 135 degrees, 225 degrees, and/or 315 degrees.
Individual elements of the determinative hinge assembly can be made from various materials, such as metals, plastics, and/or composites. These materials can be prepared in various ways, such as in the form of sheet metals, die cast metals, machined metals, 3D printed materials, molded or 3D printed plastics, and/or molded or 3D printed composites, among others, or any combination of these materials and/or preparations can be employed.
The present determinative hinge assembly concepts can be utilized with any type of device, such as but not limited to notebook computers, tablets, smart phones, wearable smart devices, and/or other types of existing, developing, and/or yet to be developed devices.
Various methods of manufacture, assembly, and use for hinge assemblies and devices are contemplated beyond those shown above relative to
Although techniques, methods, devices, systems, etc., pertaining to determinative hinge assemblies are described in language specific to structural features and/or methodological acts, it is to be understood that the subject matter defined in the appended claims is not limited to the specific features or acts described. Rather, the specific features and acts are disclosed as example forms of implementing the claimed methods, devices, systems, etc.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2040279 | Joseph | May 1936 | A |
3289877 | Wolf Hans | Dec 1966 | A |
4493316 | Reed | Jan 1985 | A |
4617699 | Nakamura | Oct 1986 | A |
4718127 | Rittmann et al. | Jan 1988 | A |
4753331 | Dietenberger et al. | Jun 1988 | A |
4845809 | Pillifant, Jr. | Jul 1989 | A |
4949427 | Keller | Aug 1990 | A |
4976007 | Lam | Dec 1990 | A |
4986763 | Boyle | Jan 1991 | A |
4996739 | Baer | Mar 1991 | A |
5041818 | Liu | Aug 1991 | A |
5173686 | Fujihara | Dec 1992 | A |
5229921 | Bohmer | Jul 1993 | A |
5448799 | Stein, Jr. | Sep 1995 | A |
5509590 | Medeiros, Jr. | Apr 1996 | A |
5566048 | Esterberg | Oct 1996 | A |
5606774 | Wu | Mar 1997 | A |
5640690 | Kudrna | Jun 1997 | A |
5666694 | Slow et al. | Sep 1997 | A |
5796576 | Kim | Aug 1998 | A |
5987704 | Tang | Nov 1999 | A |
5995373 | Nagai | Nov 1999 | A |
6108868 | Lin | Aug 2000 | A |
6223393 | Knopf | May 2001 | B1 |
6301489 | Winstead | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6416027 | Hart | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6421235 | Ditzik | Jul 2002 | B2 |
6577496 | Gioscia et al. | Jun 2003 | B1 |
6628244 | Hirosawa | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6766561 | Cheng | Jul 2004 | B1 |
6778381 | Bolognia et al. | Aug 2004 | B1 |
6813143 | Makela | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6925684 | Kang | Aug 2005 | B2 |
7058433 | Carpenter | Jun 2006 | B2 |
7127776 | Park | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7155266 | Stefansen | Dec 2006 | B2 |
7266864 | Kim | Sep 2007 | B2 |
7293380 | Repecki | Nov 2007 | B2 |
7328481 | Barnett | Feb 2008 | B2 |
7345872 | Wang | Mar 2008 | B2 |
7380312 | Ge et al. | Jun 2008 | B2 |
7407202 | Ye et al. | Aug 2008 | B2 |
7414834 | Ukonaho et al. | Aug 2008 | B2 |
7418766 | Nelson et al. | Sep 2008 | B2 |
7436674 | Barsun et al. | Oct 2008 | B2 |
7515406 | Kee | Apr 2009 | B2 |
7515707 | Ka et al. | Apr 2009 | B2 |
7584524 | Hung | Sep 2009 | B2 |
7596358 | Takagi | Sep 2009 | B2 |
7596395 | Gartrell | Sep 2009 | B2 |
7636985 | Greenbank | Dec 2009 | B2 |
7753331 | Tang | Jul 2010 | B2 |
7758082 | Weigel et al. | Jul 2010 | B2 |
7832056 | Kuwajima et al. | Nov 2010 | B2 |
7900323 | Lin | Mar 2011 | B2 |
7936559 | Chen | May 2011 | B2 |
7966694 | Estlander | Jun 2011 | B2 |
7966698 | Barnett | Jun 2011 | B2 |
8032988 | Lai et al. | Oct 2011 | B2 |
8050021 | Grady et al. | Nov 2011 | B2 |
8122970 | Palen | Feb 2012 | B2 |
8170630 | Murayama | May 2012 | B2 |
8405978 | Okutsu | Mar 2013 | B2 |
8441791 | Bohn et al. | May 2013 | B2 |
8451601 | Bohn et al. | May 2013 | B2 |
8474101 | Wang et al. | Jul 2013 | B2 |
8498100 | Whit et al. | Jul 2013 | B1 |
8522401 | Jin | Sep 2013 | B2 |
8578561 | Chuang | Nov 2013 | B2 |
8615848 | Mitsui | Dec 2013 | B2 |
8624844 | Behar et al. | Jan 2014 | B2 |
8638546 | Hoshino | Jan 2014 | B2 |
8649166 | Wu et al. | Feb 2014 | B2 |
8665382 | Sugimoto et al. | Mar 2014 | B1 |
8687354 | Uchiyama | Apr 2014 | B2 |
8713759 | Cai | May 2014 | B2 |
8776319 | Chang et al. | Jul 2014 | B1 |
8780570 | Bohn et al. | Jul 2014 | B2 |
8787016 | Rothkopf et al. | Jul 2014 | B2 |
8804324 | Bohn et al. | Aug 2014 | B2 |
8826495 | Jauvtis et al. | Sep 2014 | B2 |
8833554 | Busri | Sep 2014 | B2 |
8854834 | O'Connor et al. | Oct 2014 | B2 |
8855726 | Ozawa | Oct 2014 | B2 |
8875349 | Hanigan | Nov 2014 | B2 |
8908364 | Tseng et al. | Dec 2014 | B2 |
8908365 | Walters et al. | Dec 2014 | B2 |
8923934 | Chol et al. | Dec 2014 | B2 |
8938856 | Shin et al. | Jan 2015 | B1 |
8959714 | Hsu | Feb 2015 | B2 |
8971029 | Wong et al. | Mar 2015 | B2 |
8978206 | Hsu et al. | Mar 2015 | B2 |
8982542 | Bohn | Mar 2015 | B2 |
8988876 | Corbin | Mar 2015 | B2 |
9003607 | Hsu | Apr 2015 | B1 |
9009919 | Chiang | Apr 2015 | B1 |
9013867 | Becze | Apr 2015 | B2 |
9014381 | Quan et al. | Apr 2015 | B2 |
9069531 | Bohn et al. | Jun 2015 | B2 |
9103147 | Chuang | Aug 2015 | B1 |
9104381 | Kuramochi | Aug 2015 | B2 |
9122455 | Meyers | Sep 2015 | B2 |
9185815 | Hsu | Nov 2015 | B2 |
9201464 | Uchiyama et al. | Dec 2015 | B2 |
9243432 | Lee | Jan 2016 | B2 |
9290976 | Horng | Mar 2016 | B1 |
9310850 | Hsu | Apr 2016 | B2 |
9317243 | Becze | Apr 2016 | B2 |
9348450 | Kim | May 2016 | B1 |
9371676 | Rittenhouse | Jun 2016 | B2 |
9411365 | Tanner | Aug 2016 | B1 |
9417663 | Kinoshita et al. | Aug 2016 | B2 |
9430000 | Hood, III et al. | Aug 2016 | B2 |
9500013 | Senatori | Nov 2016 | B2 |
9507388 | Hampton et al. | Nov 2016 | B1 |
9513672 | Garelli et al. | Dec 2016 | B2 |
9523226 | Lam et al. | Dec 2016 | B1 |
9524000 | Hsu et al. | Dec 2016 | B2 |
9569002 | Walker | Feb 2017 | B2 |
9600036 | Uchiyama et al. | Mar 2017 | B2 |
9624703 | Lin | Apr 2017 | B1 |
9625947 | Lee et al. | Apr 2017 | B2 |
9625953 | Bitz et al. | Apr 2017 | B2 |
9625954 | Campbell et al. | Apr 2017 | B2 |
9684343 | Tazbaz | Jun 2017 | B2 |
9714533 | Kuramochi | Jul 2017 | B2 |
10227808 | Kabir et al. | Mar 2019 | B2 |
10241548 | Mark et al. | Mar 2019 | B2 |
10253804 | Daniel et al. | Apr 2019 | B2 |
20020147026 | Hsieh | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20030179880 | Pan et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20040091101 | Park | May 2004 | A1 |
20040212956 | Kuivas et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040226138 | Harmon et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040266239 | Kurokawa | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050018393 | Kuo | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050122671 | Homer | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050148375 | Deline | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050155182 | Han et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050239520 | Stefansen | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20060005356 | Amami et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060007648 | Wang | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060046792 | Hassemer et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060059659 | Kim | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060133052 | Harmon et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060179612 | Oshima et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20070101541 | Yin et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070117600 | Robertson et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20080112113 | Sawadski et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080174089 | Ekberg | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080184530 | Chao | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080239672 | Ghoshal | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080250604 | Chen et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20090070961 | Chung et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090104949 | Sato et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090291719 | Christensen | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20100205777 | Kim | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100207844 | Manning | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100232100 | Fukuma et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100328250 | Gorsica et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20110099756 | Chen | May 2011 | A1 |
20110115713 | Altman | May 2011 | A1 |
20110128216 | Renwick | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110177850 | Griffin et al. | Jul 2011 | A1 |
20110205695 | Hassermer et al. | Aug 2011 | A1 |
20110292605 | Chen | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20120002360 | Seo et al. | Jan 2012 | A1 |
20120037047 | Moldovan | Feb 2012 | A1 |
20120046076 | Masser | Feb 2012 | A1 |
20120120618 | Bohn | May 2012 | A1 |
20120120627 | O'Connor et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
20120127471 | Urushidani | May 2012 | A1 |
20120137471 | Kujala | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120162866 | Bohn et al. | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120170243 | Griffin et al. | Jul 2012 | A1 |
20120206864 | Bohn et al. | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120206893 | Bohn | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120257368 | Bohn et al. | Oct 2012 | A1 |
20120307472 | Bohn | Dec 2012 | A1 |
20120314399 | Bohn | Dec 2012 | A1 |
20120314400 | Bohn et al. | Dec 2012 | A1 |
20130010405 | Rothkopf et al. | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20130016489 | Yeh et al. | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20130016492 | Wang et al. | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20130046492 | Westergaard | Feb 2013 | A1 |
20130111704 | Mitsui | May 2013 | A1 |
20130135809 | Uchiyama | May 2013 | A1 |
20130139355 | Lee | Jun 2013 | A1 |
20130152342 | Ahn | Jun 2013 | A1 |
20130318746 | Kuramochi | Dec 2013 | A1 |
20130322004 | Park | Dec 2013 | A1 |
20130342094 | Walters et al. | Dec 2013 | A1 |
20140042293 | Mok | Feb 2014 | A1 |
20140126133 | Griffin | May 2014 | A1 |
20140129739 | King | May 2014 | A1 |
20140174227 | Hsu et al. | Jun 2014 | A1 |
20140185215 | Whitt et al. | Jul 2014 | A1 |
20140185220 | Whitt et al. | Jul 2014 | A1 |
20140196253 | Song et al. | Jul 2014 | A1 |
20140217875 | Park et al. | Aug 2014 | A1 |
20140246354 | Probst | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140265295 | Rhyner et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140287804 | Bohn et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140290008 | Hsu | Oct 2014 | A1 |
20140290009 | Kasai | Oct 2014 | A1 |
20140293534 | Siddiqui | Oct 2014 | A1 |
20140360296 | Hsu | Dec 2014 | A1 |
20140362507 | Kinoshita et al. | Dec 2014 | A1 |
20140373338 | O'Connor et al. | Dec 2014 | A1 |
20150016040 | Hood | Jan 2015 | A1 |
20150020351 | Lin | Jan 2015 | A1 |
20150092337 | Tan et al. | Apr 2015 | A1 |
20150153787 | Mok | Jun 2015 | A1 |
20150154437 | Aoki et al. | Jun 2015 | A1 |
20150176317 | Lee | Jun 2015 | A1 |
20150184437 | Wikander et al. | Jul 2015 | A1 |
20150227175 | Motosugi | Aug 2015 | A1 |
20150241978 | Lombardi et al. | Aug 2015 | A1 |
20150267450 | Chiang | Sep 2015 | A1 |
20150277506 | Cheah et al. | Oct 2015 | A1 |
20150309539 | Kamphuis et al. | Oct 2015 | A1 |
20150345195 | Park | Dec 2015 | A1 |
20150361696 | Tazbaz | Dec 2015 | A1 |
20150362956 | Tazbaz | Dec 2015 | A1 |
20150362958 | Shang | Dec 2015 | A1 |
20160041589 | Tazbaz | Feb 2016 | A1 |
20160070310 | Holung et al. | Mar 2016 | A1 |
20160083988 | Hsu | Mar 2016 | A1 |
20160109908 | Siddiqui | Apr 2016 | A1 |
20160132075 | Tazbaz | May 2016 | A1 |
20160132076 | Bitz et al. | May 2016 | A1 |
20160147267 | Campbell et al. | May 2016 | A1 |
20160153222 | Hu | Jun 2016 | A1 |
20160187934 | Lee et al. | Jun 2016 | A1 |
20160187935 | Tazbaz et al. | Jun 2016 | A1 |
20160201367 | Kato | Jul 2016 | A1 |
20160215541 | Tazbaz et al. | Jul 2016 | A1 |
20160224072 | Huang | Aug 2016 | A1 |
20160266615 | Uchiyama et al. | Sep 2016 | A1 |
20160299537 | Whitt et al. | Oct 2016 | A1 |
20160326786 | Lee | Nov 2016 | A1 |
20160357226 | Campbell et al. | Dec 2016 | A1 |
20170017273 | Weldon et al. | Jan 2017 | A1 |
20170090523 | Tazbaz et al. | Mar 2017 | A1 |
20170145724 | Siddiqui | May 2017 | A1 |
20170145725 | Siddiqui | May 2017 | A1 |
20180059735 | Tazbaz et al. | Mar 2018 | A1 |
20180164855 | Tazbaz et al. | Jun 2018 | A1 |
20180166842 | Siddiqui | Jun 2018 | A1 |
20180209473 | Park et al. | Jul 2018 | A1 |
20180230724 | Lin et al. | Aug 2018 | A1 |
20180292860 | Siddiqui | Oct 2018 | A1 |
20180356858 | Siddiqui et al. | Dec 2018 | A1 |
20180363341 | Siddiqui et al. | Dec 2018 | A1 |
20190094917 | Schmelzle et al. | Mar 2019 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
1180516 | Dec 2004 | CN |
103291737 | Sep 2013 | CN |
203376667 | Jan 2014 | CN |
104331124 | Feb 2015 | CN |
204610543 | Sep 2015 | CN |
0928092 | Jul 1999 | EP |
1422593 | May 2004 | EP |
2466420 | Jun 2012 | EP |
2528307 | Nov 2012 | EP |
2797296 | Oct 2014 | EP |
2008940 | Jun 1979 | GB |
2006112523 | Apr 2006 | JP |
2007072124 | Jun 2007 | WO |
2010076639 | Jul 2010 | WO |
2010093139 | Aug 2010 | WO |
2015073020 | May 2015 | WO |
2015147885 | Oct 2015 | WO |
2015179257 | Nov 2015 | WO |
2017087343 | May 2017 | WO |
Entry |
---|
“Computex: Asus Transformer Book Flip series launched with 360 degree hinge”, published Jun. 3, 2014, retrieved at <<http://tech.firstpost.com/news-analysis/computex-asus-transformer-book-flip-series-launched-with-360-degree-hinge-225064.html>> on Aug. 16, 2016, 4 pages. |
“Double geared hinge”, retrieved at <<http://www.wamungo.com/PrintModel/Detail/Double-geared-hinge-5305a74589702816c05dlab5>>, on Mar. 10, 2017, 6 pages. |
“Acer Unveils Industry's First Convertible Chromebook with 13-inch Display,” Aug. 31, 2016, retrieved at <<http:// www.acer.com/ac/en/US/press/2016/202372>>, 2 pages. |
Moving Point Hinge-Multipivot Hinge, retrieved at: <<http://websystem.gismo.se/Gismo/files/1029/2.mph%2001%20introduktion.pdf>>on Oct. 9, 2014, 6 pages. |
Elliott, Amy-Mae, “9 Nifty Laptop Feet to Keep Your PC Running Cool”, published on Jul. 30, 2012, retrieved at <<http://mashable.com/2012/07/30/Iaptop-feet/, 26 pages. |
Non-Final Office Action dated Jul. 17, 2017 from U.S. Appl. No. 14/947,994, 23 pages. |
Non-Final Office Action dated Apr. 12, 2016 from U.S. Appl. No. 14/555,184, 32 pages. |
Response filed Jun. 29, 2016 to the Non-Final Office Action dated Apr. 12, 2016 from U.S. Appl. No. 14/555,184, 10 pages. |
Notice of Allowance dated Jul. 14, 2016 from U.S. Appl. No. 14/555,184, 15 pages. |
Corrected Notice of Allowability dated Aug. 4, 2016 from U.S. Appl. No. 14/555,184, 16 pages. |
Notice of Allowance dated Oct. 24, 2016 from U.S. Appl. No. 14/555,184, 11 pages. |
Corrected Notice of Allowability dated Oct. 31, 2016 from U.S. Appl. No. 14/555,184, 6 pages. |
“360 deg Hinge Video,” published Jul. 21, 2013, retrieved at <<https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lhEczMi4nsw>>on 4ugust 17, 2016, 1 page. |
Domingo, Joel Santo, “Laptop, Tablet or Both? How to Decide,” retrieved from <<http://in.pcmag.com/laptops/64076/feature/laptop-tablet-or-both-how-to-decide>>, published May 1, 2014, 11 pages. |
“Special Purpose Hinges (cont.),” published Jan. 4, 2007, retrieved at <<http://hingedummy.info/specialpurposepage2.htm on Aug. 17, 2016, 2 pages. |
“ASUS Transformer Book Flip TP200SA 360-Degree Convertible Laptop With Quad-core Processor”, published Oct. 18, 2015, retrieved from <<http://www.tipandtrick.net/asus-transformer-book-flip-tp200sa-360-degree-convertible-laptop-full-review/>>on Oct. 26, 2015, 3 pages. |
BESTEK® 10Δ-15Δ Laptop/Notebook Cooling Pad Six-level Changeable Stand with Dual 118mm Hydraulic Fan Dual USB 2.0 360 degree Rotatable Base BTCPZ4BL, published Nov. 20, 2014, retrieved from >>http://www. amazon.com/Notebook-Six-level-Changeable-Hydraulic-Rotatable/dp/B00L81F6W0>>on Aug. 31, 2015, 5 pages. |
Brown, Mlichael, “Dell targets younger audience with 360-degree laptops and thin, light All-in-One PCs”, retrieved from <<http://www.pcworld.com/article/2304649/dell-targets-younger-audience-with-360-degree-laptops-and-thin-light-all-in-one-pcs.htm>>, published Jun. 2, 2014, 7 pages. |
“Computex: Asus Transformer Book Flip series launched with 360 Degree Hinge”, published Jun. 3, 2014, retrieved from http://tech.firstpost.com/news-analysis/computex-asus-transformer-book-flip-series-launched-with-360-degree-hinge-225064.html on Aug. 28, 2015, 4 pages. |
Hinckley et al., “Codex: A Dual Screen Tablet Computer”, In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Boston, MA, CHI 2009—New Mobile Interactions, Apr. 9, 2009, pp. 1933-1942, 10 pages. |
“HP Spectre introduce hybrid x360 laptop, rotate 360 degrees, $900”, published Apr. 25, 2015, retrieved from <<http://sharetech.biz/hp-spectre-introduce-hybrid-x360-laptop-rotate-360-%E2%80%8B%E2%80%8Bdegrees-900/>>on Oct. 26, 2015, 4 pages. |
Kravitz, Noah, “Kyocera Echo Unboxing—Dual-Screen Android Phone (video)”, published Apr. 13, 2011, retrieved from <<http://www.technobuffalo.com/videos/kyocera-echo-unboxing-dual-screen-android-phone-video/ on Oct. 26, 2015, 7 pages. |
Pradeep, “HP Announces New Pavilion x360 Convertible Laptop Inspired by Lenovo Yoga, Price Starts At $400”, published Feb. 23, 2014, retrieved from <<http://microsoft-news.com/hp-announces-new-pavilion-x360-convertible-laptop-inspired-by-lenovo-yoga-price-starts-at-400/>>on Oct. 26, 2015, 9 pages. |
Smith, Dada, “Lenovo's New Flex 3 Convertible Laptops Sport a 360 Degree Hinge”, retrieved from http://blog. parts-people.com/2015/05/13/lenovos-new-flex-3-convertible-laptops-sport-a-360-degree-hinge/>>, published May 13, 2015, 2 pages. |
Smith, Dada, “Microsoft Helps HP Design New Convertible Spectre x360,” published Mar. 3, 2015, retrieved at <<http://blog.parts-people.com/2015/03/03/microsoft-helps-hp-design-ne-convertible-spectre-x360/>>, 1 page. |
Smith, Sherri L., “Toshiba Satellite Radius Folds into 5 Different Modes”, published May 27, 2014, retrieved at <<http://blog.laptopmag.com/toshiba-satellite-radius-specs-price>>on Sep. 1, 2015, 4 pages. |
Villa, Jason de, “iPad mini case review: The best generic case you can get right now”, published Jan. 1, 2013, retrieved from http://technoodling.net/ipad-mini-case-review-the-best-generic-case-you-can-get-right-now/>>on Aug. 28, 2015, 12 pages. |
Wang, Harry, “The 360 Degrees (and 25,000 Hinge Tests) of Yoga Design,” Dec. 5, 2012, retrieved at <<http://blog.lenevo.com/en/blog/the-360-degrees-of-yoga-design>>, 14 pages. |
Non-Final Office Action dated Feb. 9, 2017 from U.S. Appl. No. 14/947,740, 35 pages. |
Response filed Apr. 13, 2017 to the Non-Final Office Action dated Feb. 9, 2017 from U.S. Appl. No. 14/947,740, 9 pages. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Feb. 20, 2017 from PCT Patent Application No. PCT/US2016/061940, 13 pages. |
Non-Final Office Action dated Nov. 3, 2016 from U.S. Appl. No. 14/947,994, 25 pages. |
Response filed Jan. 11, 2017 to the Non-Final Office Action dated Nov. 3, 2016 from U.S. Appl. No. 14/947,994, 12 pages. |
Final Office Action dated Feb. 16, 2017 from U.S. Appl. No. 14/947,994, 13 pages. |
Response filed Apr. 3, 2017 to the Final Office Action dated Feb. 16, 2017 from U.S. Appl. No. 14/947,994, 9 pages. |
Applicant-Initiated Interview Summary dated Apr. 4, 2017 from U.S. Appl. No. 14/947,994, 3 pages. |
Intemational Search Report and Written Opinion dated Feb. 16, 2017 from PCT Patent Application No. PCT/US2016/061942, 12 pages. |
Corrected Notice of Allowability dated Nov. 21, 2016 from U.S. Appl. No. 14/555,184, 6 pages. |
Preliminary Amendment filed Sep. 26, 2016 from U.S. Appl. No. 15/239,417, 7 pages. |
Non-Final Office Action dated May 25, 2017 from U.S. Appl. No. 15/239,417, 71 pages. |
Corrected Notice of Allowability dated Dec. 14, 2016 from U.S. Appl. No. 14/555,184, 6 pages. |
Notice of Allowance dated Feb. 3, 2017 from U.S. Appl. No. 14/555,184, 18 pages. |
Corrected Notice of Allowability dated Mar. 16, 2017 from U.S. Appl. No. 14/555,184, 8 pages. |
International Search Report dated Jan. 25, 2016 from PCT Patent Application No. PCT/US2015/060959, 11 pages. |
Article 34 Demand filed Jun. 8, 2016 from PCT Patent Application No. PCT/US2015/060959, 14 pages. |
Second Written Opinion dated Oct. 10, 2016 from PCT Patent Application No. PCT/US2015/060959, 7 pages. |
Response filed Dec. 7, 2016 to the Second Written Opinion dated Oct. 10, 2016 from PCT Patent Application No. PCT/US2015/060959, 8 pages. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability dated Mar. 3, 2017 from PCT Patent Application No. PCT/US2015/060959, 7 pages. |
Martin, Harlan, “Geared Hinge”, published on Jan. 27, 2015, retrieved at <<https://www.thingiverse.com/make:116451>>on Aug. 9, 2017, 1 page. |
Final Office Action dated Jun. 14, 2017 from U.S. Appl. No. 14/947,740, 25 pages. |
Applicant-Initiated Interview Summary dated Aug. 8, 2017 from U.S. Appl. No. 14/947,740, 3 pages. |
Response filed Aug. 9, 2017 to the Final Office Action dated Jun. 14, 2017 from U.S. Appl. No. 14/947,740, 9 pages. |
Applicant Initiated Interview Summary dated Aug. 15, 2017 from U.S. Appl. No. 15/239,417, 3 pages. |
Non-Final Office Action dated Aug. 28, 2017 from U.S. Appl. No. 14/947,740, 21 pages. |
Article 34 Amendment and Chapter II Demand filed Jun. 19, 2017 from PCT Patent Application No. PCT/US2016/061940, 21 pages. |
Article 34 Amendment and Chapter II Demand filed May 19, 2017 from PCT Patent Application No. PCT/US2016/061942, 14 pages. |
Response filed Aug. 23, 2017 to Non-Final Office Action dated May 25, 2017 from U.S. Appl. No. 15/239,417, 9 pages. |
Communication pursuant to Rules 161(1) and 162 EPC mailed Jul. 4, 2017 from European Patent Application No. 15801625.3-1972, 2 pages. |
Written Opinion dated Sep. 6, 2017 from PCT Patent Application No. PCT/US2016/061940, 9 pages. |
Final Office Action dated Nov. 2, 2017 from U.S. Appl. No. 14/947,994, 44 pages. |
Written Opinion dated Aug. 24, 2017 from PCT Patent Application No. PCT/US2016/061942, 7 pages. |
Final Office Action dated Feb. 5, 2018 from U.S. Appl. No. 14/47,740, 54 pages. |
International Report on Patentability dated Jan. 18, 2018 from PCT Patent Application No. PCT/US2016/061942, 8 pages. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability dated Jan. 23, 2018 from PCT Patent Application No. PCT/US2016/061940, 10 pages. |
“International Search Report & Written Opinion Issued in PCT Application No. PCT/US2018/013036”, dated Apr. 6, 2018, 11 pages. |
“International Search Report and Written Opinion issued in PCT Application No. PC/US2017/013687”, dated Apr. 21, 2017, 12 Pages. |
“Non Final Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 14/947,994”, dated Apr. 5, 2018, 28 Pages. |
“Non Final Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 15/255,056”, dated Sep. 28, 2018, 11 Pages. |
“Non Final Office Action Issued in U.S. Appl. No. 15/256,302”, dated Jun. 9, 2017, 12 Pages. |
“Non Final Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 15/374,594”, dated Sep. 19, 2017, 11 Pages. |
“Final Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 15/414,432”, dated May 17, 2018, 9 Pages. |
“Non Final Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 15/414,432”, dated Nov. 29, 2017, 10 Pages. |
“Notice of Allowance Issued in U.S. Appl. No. 15/618,067”, dated May 24, 2018, 8 Pages. |
“Notice of Allowance Issued in U.S. Application No. 15/691,524”, dated Sep. 24, 2018, 10 Pages. |
“International Search Report and Written Opinion issued in PCT Application No. PCT/US18/034245”, dated Aug. 13, 2018, 14 pages. |
“International Search Report and Written Opinion issued in PCT Application No. PCT/US2017/013591”, dated Apr. 21, 2017, 11 Pages. |
“International Search Report & Written Opinion Issued in PCT Application No. PCT/US18/034011”, dated Nov. 16, 2018, 13 Pages. |
“Final Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 15/255,056”, dated Apr. 11, 2019, 6 Pages. |
“Non Final Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 15/373,966”, dated May 15, 2019, 7 Pages. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20180066465 A1 | Mar 2018 | US |