This invention relates generally to a hip joint prosthesis, and in particular to a method of fitting a femoral implant to a resected femur, and to the femoral implant per se.
Hip replacements involve the use of an implant stem which is fitted into the medullary canal of the femur. Generally such stems achieve optimum fixation when a tapered prosthesis 10 is fitted in the medullary canal of a tapering bone 11, as schematically shown in
This form of treatment, however, suffers from the following disadvantages:
1) It requires extensive bone resection of the femoral head and part of the femoral neck.
2) It leads to loading of the shaft of the femur in a non-physiological fashion, leading to distal load transfer and proximal femoral shaft stress shielding.
3) There can be loosening of the total hip replacement stem, as there is a cantilever effect with the point of loading on the prosthetic femoral head at a distance from the point of fixation in the proximal femoral shaft.
With young active patients it is now regular practice to insert a more conservative type of hip replacement known as a resurfacing, and this type of prosthesis overcomes in major part the three disadvantages listed above. However some patients are not suitable for hip resurfacing, mainly on account of poor bone in the zenith of the femoral head due to cystic destruction, as shown at 14 in
An example of a more conservative hip replacement is disclosed in EP 0579868 A2. This type of implant attempts to conserve bone, load the femur more proximally and, by retaining most of the patient's femoral neck, resist torsional loading more satisfactorily than the standard total hip replacement. However this type of prosthesis does not fulfill the requirements referred to in relation to
An object of the invention is to provide an improved method of fitting a femoral implant to a resected femur and also an improved femoral implant itself and an improved femoral implant stem.
According to a first aspect of the invention there is provided a method of fitting a femoral implant to a resected femur comprising resecting the femoral bone through the femoral head, machining said resected proximal end of the femur to form a frustoconical or generally frustoconical cavity in the bone, and inserting into said cavity a femoral implant, which in use extends into the medullary canal of the femur.
Preferably the femoral bone is resected through the base of the femoral head. Conveniently the cavity machined into the bone of the femur is symmetrical about a centre line thereof. Advantageously at or adjacent its proximal end the femoral implant is formed with a part having an external surface complementary to the surface of said cavity in the femoral bone. Conveniently a curved stem part of the implant extends away from said part of the implant, and is received in said medullary canal. Said stem part could however be straight.
According to a further aspect of the invention, a femoral implant comprises adjacent a proximal end thereof a section having an external surface of frustoconical or generally frustoconical form, a stem part extending away from said section to a distal end of the implant and a femoral head extending directly away from said section to the proximal end of the implant.
Preferably the femoral head is integral with said section. Advantageously the femoral head is separate from said section. Conveniently the separate femoral head is secured to said section by respective interfitting parts thereof. Desirably a frustoconical spigot extending from said section is received in a complementarily shaped cavity in the femoral head. More preferably the spigot is a tight frictional fit in said cavity, or is cemented therein. The central part of the femoral head is preferably hollow. Desirably the implant is manufactured of cobalt chrome. The stem part is preferably curved, but could be straight.
According to a still further aspect of the invention a stem of a femoral implant has a stem part extending to a distal end Of the stem and a section from which the stem part extends, said section having an external surface which is of frustoconical or generally frustoconical form and which terminates at a free end of the section.
Conveniently a spigot extends from said free end of the section for connection, in use, of a femoral head to said stem. Preferably said spigot has a frustoconical external surface. Desirably the stem part is cemented in place or modified for suitable biological fixation, in use. The stem part is preferably curved, but could alternatively be straight.
The invention will now be described, by way of example, with reference to the accompanying drawings, in which:
To explain the present invention, reference is firstly made to
In
With the present invention, as will be described, the resectioning is not carried out at a level through the neck 18, but instead is carried out through the femoral head. Accordingly the line C-C represents the resection level for one embodiment of the present invention. By resecting along the line C-C through the base of the femoral head, bone in the transition area between the femoral head and the femoral neck is retained, thus providing the opportunity for exploiting the requirements referred to in relation to
Accordingly the first stage in the hip replacement method is to resect the proximal end of the femur at a level through the head 16, for example at the line C-C. By resecting the bone at this position through the base of the femoral head, it is possible then to machine the interior of the bone into the form of a truncated cone, i.e. in the form of an engine valve seating, with this frustoconical or generally frustoconical form of cavity produced thus for filling the requirements set out in relation to
The prosthesis would typically be manufactured from cobalt chrome or other suitable metallic material, and the implant part 24 would generally either be cemented in place or modified for suitable biological fixation. The head component 25 could either be used as a hemi-arthroplasty with the head component articulating against the patient's normal acetabular cartilage or alternatively the head component could be articulated against a prosthetic acetabular component typically manufactured from cobalt chrome, ceramic or polyethylene material. It will thus be appreciated that with the prosthesis described and illustrated, the head component extends directly away from the section 27 received in the cavity 22 in contrast to the arrangement described and shown in EP 0579868 A2 where the head is connected via a connecting portion to the implant part so that the head is spaced from, and thus does not directly extend from the free end of the implant part which, in this prior art arrangement is constituted by the transversely projecting collar. Typically for different patients, the maximum diameter of the cavity 22, and thus effectively the maximum diameter of the section 27 received therein, is from 29 mm to 45 mm, and as shown in
Accordingly, in accordance with a method of the invention the proximal end of the femur is resected at the level of the line C-C shown in
The implant part 24 is then fitted into the cavity 22 and medullary canal 23 as shown in
With regard to
In a further embodiment of the two-part prosthesis, the proximal end of the frustoconical aspect of section 27 could be extended to form a peripheral cone junction with the inner aspect of the femoral head component. In a still further embodiment the stem part of the one or two piece implant could be straight rather than curved.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
0207170.2 | Mar 2002 | GB | national |
The present application is a Continuation Application of U.S. application Ser. No. 12/889,541, which was filed on Sep. 24, 2010, entitled HIP JOINT PROSTHESIS and claims priority to U.S. application Ser. No. 10/396,616, now U.S. Pat. No. 7,879,106, which was filed on Mar. 25, 2003, entitled Hip Joint Prosthesis and claims priority to Great Britain Application No. 0207170.2, which was filed on Mar. 26, 2002, entitled HIP JOINT PROSTHESIS, the disclosures of which are incorporated by reference herein in their entirety.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2685877 | Dobelle | Aug 1954 | A |
2718228 | Van Steenbrugghe | Sep 1955 | A |
2781758 | Chevalier | Feb 1957 | A |
2934065 | Townley | Apr 1960 | A |
3064645 | Ficat et al. | Nov 1962 | A |
3521302 | Muller | Jul 1970 | A |
3744061 | Frost | Jul 1973 | A |
3787132 | Garnett | Jan 1974 | A |
3848273 | Frey | Nov 1974 | A |
3874003 | Moser et al. | Apr 1975 | A |
3987499 | Scharbach et al. | Oct 1976 | A |
4004300 | English | Jan 1977 | A |
4005495 | Locke et al. | Feb 1977 | A |
4032994 | Frey | Jul 1977 | A |
4101985 | Baumann et al. | Jul 1978 | A |
4123806 | Amstutz et al. | Nov 1978 | A |
4141088 | Treace et al. | Feb 1979 | A |
4224699 | Weber | Sep 1980 | A |
4279042 | Andriacchi et al. | Jul 1981 | A |
4283799 | Pratt et al. | Aug 1981 | A |
4332036 | Sutter et al. | Jun 1982 | A |
4359785 | Niederer | Nov 1982 | A |
4506393 | Murphy | Mar 1985 | A |
4608055 | Morrey et al. | Aug 1986 | A |
4658808 | Link | Apr 1987 | A |
4738681 | Koeneman et al. | Apr 1988 | A |
4752296 | Buechel et al. | Jun 1988 | A |
4770660 | Averill | Sep 1988 | A |
4778474 | Homsy | Oct 1988 | A |
4840632 | Kampner | Jun 1989 | A |
4846841 | Oh | Jul 1989 | A |
4919675 | Dietschi | Apr 1990 | A |
4938771 | Vecsei et al. | Jul 1990 | A |
4950300 | Langlais | Aug 1990 | A |
4976740 | Kleiner | Dec 1990 | A |
4990161 | Kampner | Feb 1991 | A |
5133764 | Pappas et al. | Jul 1992 | A |
5176711 | Grimes | Jan 1993 | A |
5192329 | Christie et al. | Mar 1993 | A |
5222985 | Homsy | Jun 1993 | A |
5263991 | Wiley et al. | Nov 1993 | A |
5310408 | Schryver et al. | May 1994 | A |
5326368 | Collazo | Jul 1994 | A |
5358527 | Forte | Oct 1994 | A |
5376120 | Sarver et al. | Dec 1994 | A |
5389107 | Nassar et al. | Feb 1995 | A |
5458651 | Lawes | Oct 1995 | A |
5458653 | Davidson | Oct 1995 | A |
5549692 | Hauser et al. | Aug 1996 | A |
5571193 | Kampner | Nov 1996 | A |
5607426 | Ralph et al. | Mar 1997 | A |
5641323 | Caldarise | Jun 1997 | A |
5658352 | Draenert | Aug 1997 | A |
5725594 | McTighe et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
5733338 | Kampner | Mar 1998 | A |
5735905 | Parr | Apr 1998 | A |
5766263 | Grundei et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5800553 | Albrektsson et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5800560 | Draenert | Sep 1998 | A |
5871547 | Abouaf et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
5871548 | Sanders et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
5871549 | Jayashankar et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
5888204 | Ralph et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5888210 | Draenert | Mar 1999 | A |
6013104 | Kampner | Jan 2000 | A |
6030417 | Bresler et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6033439 | Camino et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6059830 | Lippincott, III et al. | May 2000 | A |
6096084 | Townley | Aug 2000 | A |
6120542 | Camino et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6120544 | Grundei et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6156069 | Amstutz | Dec 2000 | A |
6162257 | Gustilo et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6200349 | Naybour | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6224634 | Keller | May 2001 | B1 |
6284002 | Sotereanos | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6312473 | Oshida | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6368352 | Camino et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6416553 | White et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6454809 | Tornier | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6475241 | Pappas | Nov 2002 | B2 |
RE37964 | Prats et al. | Jan 2003 | E |
6575975 | Brace et al. | Jun 2003 | B2 |
6610099 | Albrektsson et al. | Aug 2003 | B1 |
7238208 | Camino et al. | Jul 2007 | B2 |
7374576 | Ries et al. | May 2008 | B1 |
7494509 | Hershberger et al. | Feb 2009 | B1 |
7494510 | Zweymuller | Feb 2009 | B2 |
7641699 | Unger | Jan 2010 | B2 |
7857859 | Willi et al. | Dec 2010 | B2 |
7879106 | McMinn | Feb 2011 | B2 |
8177852 | Mcminn | May 2012 | B2 |
8470049 | Walter et al. | Jun 2013 | B2 |
8535387 | Meridew et al. | Sep 2013 | B2 |
20020072805 | Sullivan et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020095215 | Camino et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020128720 | Masini | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020133234 | Sotereanos | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20030014123 | Copf et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030097135 | Penenberg | May 2003 | A1 |
20030163202 | Lakin | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20040024468 | Lualdi et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040199258 | Macara | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040225367 | Glien et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20050197712 | Bigsby et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050216011 | Paul | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050256585 | Park et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20060058887 | DeSmet et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20080015708 | Howie et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080021568 | Tulkis et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080183298 | McTighe et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080200990 | McTighe et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080200991 | Collins et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080228283 | Willi et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20090043397 | Park | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090088863 | Boucher et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090105842 | Noetzli et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090204225 | Meridew et al. | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20090306788 | Timoteo et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20090326670 | Keefer et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20100076570 | Band et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100100193 | White | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100198356 | Hoffman | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100228356 | Frederick et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100298949 | McMinn et al. | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20100312354 | Bandoh et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20110166666 | Meulink et al. | Jul 2011 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
676922 | Mar 1991 | CH |
923383 | Jul 1954 | DE |
3023354 | Apr 1981 | DE |
19904126 | Mar 1999 | DE |
0025835 | Apr 1981 | EP |
0176711 | Apr 1986 | EP |
0228523 | Jul 1987 | EP |
0302850 | Feb 1989 | EP |
0402810 | Dec 1990 | EP |
0477113 | Mar 1992 | EP |
0551794 | Jul 1993 | EP |
0579868 | Jan 1994 | EP |
0605368 | Jul 1994 | EP |
0666069 | Aug 1995 | EP |
0711534 | May 1996 | EP |
1138283 | Oct 2001 | EP |
1236450 | Sep 2002 | EP |
1332736 | Apr 2005 | EP |
2021313 | Jul 1970 | FR |
2134170 | Dec 1972 | FR |
2429010 | Jan 1980 | FR |
2578162 | Sep 1986 | FR |
2629707 | Oct 1989 | FR |
2363837 | Mar 1990 | FR |
2644690 | Sep 1990 | FR |
2706283 | Dec 1994 | FR |
2758255 | Jul 1998 | FR |
2827503 | Jan 2003 | FR |
2882921 | Sep 2006 | FR |
2883722 | Oct 2006 | FR |
2069340 | Aug 1981 | GB |
2139097 | Nov 1987 | GB |
2366733 | Mar 2002 | GB |
61-094650 | May 1986 | JP |
07-506739 | Jul 1995 | JP |
09508816 | Sep 1997 | JP |
10201779 | Aug 1998 | JP |
WO-8911837 | Dec 1989 | WO |
WO-9317639 | Sep 1993 | WO |
WO-9515129 | Jun 1995 | WO |
WO-9716137 | May 1997 | WO |
WO-9807393 | Feb 1998 | WO |
WO-02083035 | Oct 2002 | WO |
WO-03013397 | Feb 2003 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Huggler, “A new Approach Towards Hip-Prosthesis Design”; Arch Orthop Traumat Surg; 1980, vol. 97, pp. 141-144. |
Office Action dated Nov. 7, 2007 in corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 10/559,950. |
Office Action dated Jul. 17, 2008 in corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 10/559,950. |
Office Action dated May 21, 2009 in corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 10/559,950. |
Office Action dated Sep. 25, 2009 in corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 10/559,950. |
Office Action dated Jul. 28, 2009 in corresponding Japanese Patent Application No. 2005-516419. |
Office Action dated Aug. 14, 2007 in corresponding European Patent Application No. 04736652.1. |
Office Action dated Aug. 7, 2008 in corresponding European Patent Application No. 04736652.1. |
Office Action dated Mar. 27, 2009 in corresponding Australian Application No. 2004244820. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20130123933 A1 | May 2013 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 10396616 | Mar 2003 | US |
Child | 12889541 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 12889541 | Sep 2010 | US |
Child | 13465905 | US |