This invention generally relates to the combination of a surgical apparatus for rigidly inter-connecting fractured bones of the extremities, in particular, the proximal femur, together with a method and tooling for its insertion
Compression screw systems are widely used to treat fractures of the proximal femur, including those of the femoral neck and the peri-trochanteric areas of the bone.
The systems generally consist of a lag screw inserted from the lateral side of the femur, across the fracture and into the head of the femur, holding the bone fragments together. The trailing end of the screw may be supported either by a cortical side plate with a tubular barrel through which the nail can slide, or by an intramedullary nail with a transverse opening, that has been inserted longitudinally into the medullary canal of the femur.
Their wide usage is based on their ability to compress the bone ends together to promote healing, and to permit lateral sliding as some absorption with shortening of the healing bone takes place.
Effective as lag screws are, however they have some disadvantages. The bulk of the threaded end displaces valuable viable bone and can lead to death of the head of the femur. The threads can pull out of osteoporotic bone, defeating their purpose. Rotation of the head of the femur around the nail at the fracture site with certain patient activities can also interfere with fracture healing, especially with high neck fractures.
Over the past several decades, numerous inventions have been devised in an attempt to circumvent the problems associated with the use of lag screws, chiefly among them being the use of prongs, tangs or hooks that that are extruded from or near the tip of the nail to lock into the surrounding bone, yet are not widely used, possibly because of problems relating to their deployment in the femur, and to their removal.
The present invention overcomes problems of deployment by using a nail with locking tangs, wherein the tangs are deployed by an impulse force applied to a central drive-shaft which drives and progressively forces the tangs through die-like openings into the dense bone of the femoral head. The resulting recoil which would normally cause the entire nail with its tangs to be driven further into the bone, or which could cause distraction of the fracture, is directed by specialized tooling to a location outside of the immediate operative site, thereby enabling deployment of the tangs while the nail itself remains stationary relative to the surrounding bone.
It comprises a combination of a nail employing a plurality of tangs for the fixation of fractures of a bone, in particular the hip region of the femur, together with tooling and method for deploying and retracting the tangs.
Whereas the prior art deployed the tangs gradually from within a hip nail by means of worm gears, traction on a drawbar, pressure on a drawbar by means of a screw mechanism, or by a molly-like central screw assembly, this invention avoids the use of small, complex functioning parts, which can bend or break during deployment into dense bone, and which can twist or deform the tangs from their normal configuration, making removal of the nail difficult.
Instead, this apparatus deploys the locking tangs by means of forcible blows on a centrally located drive shaft which is releasably attached to the base of the tang body, causing the tangs to deploy into the surrounding bone. As with any directed force, there exists an equal and opposite counterforce, a “recoil”, which if not controlled, would cause the entire nail together with the tangs to translate further into the bone, rather than having the tangs alone translate into the bone, while the nail sheath itself remains unmoved.
This apparatus neutralizes the recoil by means of tooling that redirects the counterforce away from the nail to a heavy mass outside of the patient's body, using the inertia of the mass to absorb the recoil energy of the blow.
The first end of the recoil transferring tube is releasably fastened to the trailing end of the nail sheath, and the second end to the recoil transferring tool shaft, which in turn is releasably fastened to an arbitrarily configured inertial mass, for example, a mass composed of a heavy material such as lead, to make it more compact, measuring seven inches square and an inch thick, weighing approximately twenty pounds, mounted on a stand an appropriate short distance from the operative site, and covered with sterile drapes. The weight of the inertial mass could be more or less than the example of twenty pounds, depending on the desired amount of relative motion of the assembly's components during deployment, and could be of any suitable configuration consistent with its function in the operating room.
Furthermore, since the acceleration of the nail and the attached large inertial mass resulting from the force impressed upon them during the tang deployment is proportional to the total mass of the tang body and the tangs which would be minimal, the resulting acceleration of the nail and inertial mass would be miniscule in comparison.
Alternatively, the second end of the intermediate tool rod could be releasably fastened to a rigid stanchion or bracket fastened to the operating table, but this would not be as practical as using the inertia of a moveable mass which can be quickly and easily moved into alignment with the longitudinal axis of the embedded hip nail and its recoil transferring tube.
As a result of using a tool which incorporates an inertial mass outside of the patient's body to absorb and counteract the longitudinal driving force needed to deploy the locking tangs, the tangs are able to be properly deployed without significant longitudinal translation of the nail itself. This avoids the tangs being twisted, bent or distorted and possibly being extruded into a longitudinal position rather than becoming essentially perpendicular to the long axis of the nail. In addition, there is less of a tendency for the fracture to become dis-impacted.
Further advantages of this method of using an external inertial mass to absorb the recoil is that it is simple and easy to use, and it avoids using complex insertion hardware. The use of tangs in the head of the femur instead of lag screw threads, tends to better resist pull-out, especially in osteoporotic bone, and better controls rotation of the head of the femur during healing. Because of their smaller bulk, they also interfere less with the circulation of blood in the head of the femur, thereby promoting healing. A further advantage of this nail is that it is easily adaptable for use with either a known cortical side plate or the known transverse opening of a centrally placed intramedullary rod, each configured to prevent rotation of the nail, yet permitting controlled sliding.
Another significant advantage of using impulse force such as with a mallet to drive the tangs into a proper position within the dense bone of the femoral head is that considerable force is needed to progressively transform the tangs from a linear state to a curvilinear state, especially if the deployed tangs have been made wide enough and thick enough to withstand a strong traction force placed on them without flexing or deforming, which would be difficult to achieve by other means.
The locking tangs can be easily and quickly withdrawn back into the body of the nail for its removal by re-attaching the deployment assembly and reversing the direction of the forces.
The tang bearing rod 24, is shown within the nail sheath 14, with the un-deployed locking tangs 16 with their tips 22 positioned in the openings with sloping floors 20. The locking tangs in one embodiment, are formed from the leading end of the tang bearing rod, and in another embodiment are formed separately and welded to the end of the rod, depending on the requirements of the tangs, such as their malleability and stiffness.
The angle of the slope of the floors of the openings 20 determines the angle of the segments, relative to the longitudinal axis of the nail after they have been extruded, which in one embodiment is approximately ninety degrees.
The trailing end of the tang bearing rod 24 is threaded for a coupling 26 with the leading end of the central driving shaft 36. The trailing end of the driving shaft is enlarged to form a striking pad 38. Mallet blows to the striking pad cause the driving shaft to drive the tang bearing rod 24 with the attached locking tangs 16 further into the tubular nail sheath 16, which causes the bone penetrating tips 18 of the locking tangs to engage with the openings with sloping floors 20 and to become deployed 48 into the femoral head 12.
The recoil of the force driving the locking tangs through the orifices, if not controlled, would also cause the nail sheath 14 to translate further into the head of the femur 12. In order to prevent this from happening, the leading end of a recoil transferring tube 32 is releasably attached to the base of the nail sheath 24 with the threaded coupling 26. A recoil transferring tool shaft 40 is releasably attached to the trailing end of the tube 32 by means of a slot 44 which is braced against the collar 34. The trailing end of the shaft 40 is the releasably attached to an arbitrarily configured mass 42 by means of the connecting rod 62 and slot 44
The length of the shaft 40 is predetermined to extend from the immediate operative site, to the mass 42, which is positioned a short distance away from the operative site, for example, but not limited to, a distance of approximately twenty-four inches, a distance consistent with practical considerations such as sterile requirements and access to the striking pad 38.
The mass 42 could be of any practical configuration, but in one embodiment is a seven inch square, one inch thick mass of lead, weighing approximately twenty pounds with an attaching slot 44 for the releasable attachment of the shaft 40 and connecting rod 62. A supporting loop 46 enables the mass to be supported from a stand (not shown) that enables it to be quickly moved into alignment with the central driving shaft 36.
As the central driving shaft 36 and the attached locking tangs are being driven forward through the nail sheath 14, the recoil is transferred back through the recoil transferring tube 32, and through the recoil transferring tool shaft 40, and connecting rod 62 to the inertial mass 42, which because of its very large inertia, absorbs the force of the recoil. As a result, the locking tangs 16 are driven cleanly through the openings 20, into the femoral head, while the nail sheath 14 remains stationary relative to the surrounding bone.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
1091674 | Lee | Mar 1914 | A |
2077804 | Morrison | Apr 1937 | A |
2631584 | Purificato | Mar 1953 | A |
2685877 | Dobelle | Aug 1954 | A |
3024785 | Dobelle | Mar 1962 | A |
3103926 | Cochran et al. | Sep 1963 | A |
3497953 | Weissman | Mar 1970 | A |
3791380 | Dawidowski | Feb 1974 | A |
3892232 | Neufeld | Jul 1975 | A |
4236512 | Aginsky | Dec 1980 | A |
4275717 | Bolesky | Jun 1981 | A |
4498468 | Hansson | Feb 1985 | A |
4519100 | Wills et al. | May 1985 | A |
4530355 | Griggs | Jul 1985 | A |
4759352 | Lozier | Jul 1988 | A |
4790304 | Rosenberg | Dec 1988 | A |
5217462 | Asnis et al. | Jun 1993 | A |
5217486 | Rice et al. | Jun 1993 | A |
5429641 | Gotfried | Jul 1995 | A |
5514138 | McCarthy | May 1996 | A |
5534004 | Santangelo | Jul 1996 | A |
5643321 | McDevitt | Jul 1997 | A |
5810820 | Santori et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5836950 | Hansson | Nov 1998 | A |
5843127 | Li | Dec 1998 | A |
5971986 | Santori et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
5976139 | Bramlet | Nov 1999 | A |
6077264 | Chemello | Jun 2000 | A |
6183474 | Bramlet et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6443954 | Bramlet | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6447546 | Bramlet et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6558388 | Bartsch et al. | May 2003 | B1 |
6575974 | Gotfried | Jun 2003 | B2 |
6648889 | Bramlet | Nov 2003 | B2 |
6695844 | Bramlet et al. | Feb 2004 | B2 |
7029476 | Hansson | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7118572 | Bramlet et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7211086 | Biedermann | May 2007 | B2 |
7780710 | Orbay et al. | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7850699 | Hansson | Dec 2010 | B2 |
7931653 | Hansson | Apr 2011 | B2 |
8083776 | Alvarez | Dec 2011 | B2 |
8157801 | Doubler et al. | Apr 2012 | B2 |
8197519 | Schlaepfer et al. | Jun 2012 | B2 |
8262709 | Powlan | Sep 2012 | B1 |
8308782 | Jackson | Nov 2012 | B2 |
8337495 | Powlan | Dec 2012 | B1 |
20040002735 | Lizardi et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040049192 | Shimizu | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20090112208 | Borgia et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20100057141 | Abdelgany et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100280556 | Hansson | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20110066190 | Schaller et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20120197315 | Kim | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120310291 | Jackson | Dec 2012 | A1 |
Entry |
---|
Ola Olsson; Lunds University,“Alternative techniques in hip fracture surgery,” University Dissertation, Helsingborg Hosp., Helsingborg, Sweden. |
Olsson et al., Extracapsular hip fractures: Twinhook or lag screw? Helsingborg Hosp., Helsingborg, Sweden. |
Hagino, T. rt al., Twin hook fixation for femoral fractures. Journal of Orthopedic Surgery, Aug. 2008, 16(2) , p. 162-64. |