The invention relates to orthopaedic implants. In particular, this invention relates to hip stem prostheses.
Total hip arthroplasty is often used to restore function to a diseased or injured hip joint. Positions and directions relative to the hip joint may be described in terms of proximal being nearer the hip joint, distal being further from the hip joint, anterior being nearer the front of the body, posterior being nearer the back of the body, medial being nearer the centerline of the body, and lateral being further from the center line of the body. In total hip arthroplasty, the surfaces of the femur and pelvis are cut away and replaced with substitute implants. In a typical case, the implants include a hip stem component, a femoral head component, and an acetabular component.
The femoral bone is prepared by creating an opening down the intramedullary canal into the femoral bone along an axis from a proximal position at the upper end of the femur toward a distal position at the lower end of the femur. The pelvis is prepared by reaming the acetabulum. The implants may be placed directly in contact with the prepared bone surfaces for bony fixation of the implant. Alternatively, bone cement may be introduced into the prepared canal and acetabulum so that it hardens around and locks the components in place.
The hip stem component includes a stem portion extending down into the intramedullary canal of the femur and a neck portion extending away from the femur to support the femoral head component.
A recent development is the use of minimally invasive surgical techniques in which the bone is prepared and the implants inserted through small incisions that cause less trauma to surrounding muscles and other soft tissues such that the patients recovery is faster. Such minimally invasive surgical techniques can be challenging due to the difficulty in visualizing the surgical cavity and maneuvering the instruments and implants within the tight confines of the incision.
The present invention provides a hip prosthesis for insertion into a femur having a proximal end adjacent a hip joint, a distal end adjacent a knee joint, an anterior side, a posterior side, a medial side, a lateral side, and an intramedullary canal.
In one aspect of the invention, the prosthesis includes a stem having a proximal end, a distal end, and a longitudinal axis. The stem includes anterior and posterior locking surfaces which each diverge from the stem axis proximally at an angle greater than 3 degrees. The stem further includes a shank portion extending distally from adjacent the anterior and posterior locking surfaces and converging at an angle distally toward the stem axis
In another aspect of the invention, the prosthesis comprises a lateral surface which tapers both proximally and distally toward the stem axis to create a relief zone proximally and transitioning to a conical tapering surface distally.
In another aspect of the invention, the lateral surface diverges from the stem axis distally to an inflection point which is the most lateral point on the lateral surface and the lateral surface converges toward the stem axis distally from the inflection point.
In another aspect of the invention, the prosthesis includes anterior and posterior planar faces between the anterior and posterior locking surfaces and the shank portion. The anterior and posterior planar surfaces being angled relative to the stem axis at an angle shallower than the angle of the shank portion.
Various examples of the present invention will be discussed with reference to the appended drawings. These drawings depict only illustrative examples of the invention and are not to be considered limiting of its scope.
The proximal locking portion 40 advantageously includes anterior and posterior locking surfaces 42, 44 that diverge from the stem axis 16 proximally as best seen in
The proximal locking portion also advantageously includes a hyperbolic shaped flat relief surface 48 to better avoid stem 10 impingement with the bone during stem insertion. In particular, the relief surface 48 helps to avoid impingement with the greater trochanter. The surface 48 is created by angling the proximal portion of the lateral side 24 in toward the stem axis 16. The relief surface 48 transitions from a flat surface to a tapering cone extending distally downward toward the tip of the stem 10. Referring to
The proximal locking portion 40 extends from 10 to 30 percent of the overall stem length measured between the proximal and distal ends 12, 14 of the stem 10. Preferably the proximal locking portion 40 extends from 15 to 25 percent. More preferably, the locking portion 40 extends downwardly from the proximal end 12 by 20 percent of the stem length. Preferably, the proximal locking portion 40 includes a porous surface geometry 60 to promote bony ingrowth for long term fixation. In the illustrative hip stem 10, the porous surface 60 covers the proximal locking portion 40 in a continuous layer over the anterior, posterior, medial, and lateral sides 18, 20, 22, 24. The porous surface 60 extends distally into the transition portion 80 on the medial side 22 and wraps partway over the anterior and posterior sides 18, 20. Preferably, the porous surface includes a tantalum metal porous surface having a structure similar to that of natural trabecular bone. Such a material is described in U.S. Pat. No. 5,282,861 entitled “OPEN CELL TANTALUM STRUCTURES FOR CANCELLOUS BONE IMPLANTS AND CELL AND TISSUE RECEPTORS”, issued to R. B. Kaplan and assigned to Ultramet. The material is fabricated of tantalum using vapor deposition. This material has been sold by Implex Corporation of Allendale, N.J., under the tradename HEDROCEL. Zimmer, Inc., with manufacturing facilities in Warsaw, Ind., sells a line of surgical implants incorporating this trabecular metal technology. The trabecular metal consists of interconnecting pores resulting in a structural biomaterial that is 80% porous and which allows much greater bone ingrowth compared to conventional porous coatings and much greater shear strength. In addition, the trabecular metal possesses a high strength-to-weight ratio. The material is produced by vapor depositing tantalum on an open celled porous matrix.
The neck 17 advantageously includes opposed flat surfaces 19 formed on it between the proximal end 12 of the stem 10 and the free end 21 of the neck 17. The flat surfaces 19 provide clearance for increased articulation of the stem relative to an acetabular component (not shown). The flat surfaces 19 further provide an engagement surface for an instrument to grip the neck 17.
The transition portion 80 of the stem 10 advantageously includes anterior and posterior faces 82, 84 to provide clearance between the stem and the cortical bone of the intramedullary canal of the femur during minimally invasive surgical procedures. In a minimally invasive hip procedure, soft tissues tend to push the stem 10 into the sides of the intramedullary canal such that the stem insertion forces are not acting straight down into the canal. These off axis forces can lead to femoral fractures. The anterior and posterior faces 82, 84 of the present invention relieve initial insertion hoop stresses making stem insertion easier and safer.
The anterior face 82 lies between the anterior locking surface 42 and the shank portion 100 and the posterior face 84 between the posterior locking surface 44 and the shank portion 100. The faces 82, 84 further lie between the medial and lateral sides 22, 24. The anterior and posterior faces 82, 84 are preferably angled relative to the stem axis at an angle shallower than the angle of the anterior and posterior locking surfaces 42, 44 and preferably at an angle shallower than the taper of the shank portion 100 which will be discussed below. Preferably the faces 82, 84 are each angled relative to the axis 16 at an angle less than 3 degrees; more preferably the faces 82, 84 are parallel to the axis 16.
The distal shank portion 100 generally forms a tapering cone having an included angle β of 3 degrees, as shown in
Although examples of a hip stem prosthesis and its use have been described and illustrated in detail, it is to be understood that the same is intended by way of illustration and example only and is not to be taken by way of limitation. Accordingly, variations in and modifications to the hip stem prosthesis and its use will be apparent to those of ordinary skill in the art, and the following claims are intended to cover all such modifications and equivalents.
This application is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/465,172, filed on May 7, 2012, which issued as U.S. Pat. No. 8,858,646, which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/880,365, filed on Sep. 13, 2010, now issued as U.S. Pat. No. 8,206,455, which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/063,030, filed on Feb. 22, 2005, issued as U.S. Pat. No. 7,842,096, the benefit of priority of each of which is claimed hereby, and each of which are incorporated by reference herein in its entirety.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4536894 | Galante et al. | Aug 1985 | A |
4650489 | Thompson | Mar 1987 | A |
4792339 | Tepic | Dec 1988 | A |
4813963 | Hori et al. | Mar 1989 | A |
4895573 | Koeneman et al. | Jan 1990 | A |
5007931 | Smith | Apr 1991 | A |
5236457 | Devanathan | Aug 1993 | A |
5316550 | Forte | May 1994 | A |
5443512 | Parr et al. | Aug 1995 | A |
5593451 | Averill et al. | Jan 1997 | A |
5702487 | Averill et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
5863295 | Averill et al. | Jan 1999 | A |
6136035 | Lob et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6165177 | Wilson et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6190417 | Itoman et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6395327 | Shetty | May 2002 | B1 |
6514288 | Meulink et al. | Feb 2003 | B2 |
6576014 | Shetty | Jun 2003 | B2 |
6676706 | Mears et al. | Jan 2004 | B1 |
6685987 | Shetty | Feb 2004 | B2 |
6695884 | Townley | Feb 2004 | B1 |
6994731 | Howie | Feb 2006 | B2 |
7001672 | Justin | Feb 2006 | B2 |
7497875 | Zweymuller | Mar 2009 | B1 |
7842096 | Fridshtand et al. | Nov 2010 | B2 |
8206455 | Fridshtand et al. | Jun 2012 | B2 |
8858646 | Fridshtand et al. | Oct 2014 | B2 |
20020138151 | Hubbard | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20030074080 | Murray | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030232124 | Medlin et al. | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20040010319 | McTighe et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040107001 | Cheal et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20050048193 | Li et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20120221116 | Fridshtand et al. | Aug 2012 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2678509 | Jan 1993 | FR |
2683450 | May 1993 | FR |
2683450 | May 1997 | FR |
0974317 | Jan 2000 | FR |
2853524 | Oct 2004 | FR |
2216425 | Oct 1989 | GB |
WO-9416649 | Aug 1994 | WO |
WO-9420046 | Sep 1994 | WO |
WO-9741809 | Nov 1997 | WO |
WO-0059410 | Oct 2000 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Machine Translation of EP 0974317, accessed Mar. 2, 2106, pp. 1-17. |
Machine Translation of FR 3678509, accessed Mar. 2, 2016, pp. 1-6. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 11/063,030, Advisory Action mailed Mar. 11, 2010”, 3 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 11/063,030, Amendment under 1.312 filed Aug. 18, 10”, 10 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 11/063,030, Final Office Action mailed Feb. 7, 2008”, 8 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 11/063,030, Final Office Action mailed Nov. 24, 2009”, 14 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 11/063,030, Non-Final Office Action mailed Apr. 8, 2009”, 9 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 11/063,030, Non-Final Office Action mailed Jun. 13, 2007”, 15 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 11/063,030, Non-Final Office Action mailed Sep. 30, 2008”, 8 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 11/063,030, Notice of Allowance mailed Jul. 29, 2010”,7 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 11/063,030, PTO Response to 312 Amendment mailed Sep. 13, 2010”, 2 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 11/063,030, Response filed Feb. 24, 2010 to Office Action mailed Nov. 24, 2009”, 9 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 11/063,030, Response filed Jun. 6, 2008 to Final Office Action mailed Feb. 7, 2008”, 14 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 11/063,030, Response filed Jul. 8, 2009 to Office Action mailed Apr. 8, 2009”, 9 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 11/063,030, Response filed Nov. 13, 2007 to Office Action mailed Jun. 13, 2007”, 9 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 11/063,030, Response filed Dec. 30, 2008 to Office Action mailed Sep. 30, 2008”, 9 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 12/880,365, Final Office Action mailed Feb. 16, 2012”, 15 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 12/880,365, Non Final Office Action mailed Mar. 1, 2011”, 11 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 12/880,365, Non Final Office Action mailed Aug. 3, 2011”, 15 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 12/880,365, Notice of Allowance mailed Apr. 27, 2012”, 7 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 12/880,365, Response filed Apr. 13, 2012 to Final Office Action mailed Feb. 16, 2012”, 8 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 12/880,365, Response filed May 19, 2011 to Non Final Office Action mailed Mar. 1, 2011”, 11 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 12/880,365, Response filed Nov. 1, 2011 to Non Final Office Action mailed Aug. 3, 2011”, 16 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 12/880,365, Response filed Nov. 8, 11 to Notice of Non-Compliant Amendment mailed Nov. 4, 2011”, 7 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 13/465,172, Non Final Office Action mailed Feb. 5, 2013”, 11 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 13/465,172, Non Final Office Action mailed Sep. 27, 2013”, 10 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 13/465,172, Notice of Allowance mailed Jun. 11, 2014”, 7 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 13/465,172, Response filed Jan. 27, 2014 to Non-Final Office Action mailed Sep. 27, 2013”, 9 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 13/465,172, Response filed Jun. 5, 2013 to Non Final Office Action mailed Feb. 5, 2013”, 13 pgs. |
“Definition of “Trapezoid””, Merriam-Webster Dictionary, (Nov. 20, 2009), 1 pg. |
“Zimmer Epoch Hip Prosthesis”, Webpage, [Online]. Retrieved from the Internet: <www.zimmer.com>, (Accessed Mar. 13, 2008), 3 pgs. |
“Zimmer Epoch Hip Prosthesis”, Surgical Technique, 97-4075-02, (2002), 14 pgs. |
“Zimmer Epoch Hip Prothesis”, Brochure, 97-4075-01, (2002), 8 pgs. |
“Zimmer VerSys Cemented, Cemented Plus, and Cemented CT Hip Prostheses”, Zimmer, Inc., Surgical Technique, (1997), 18 pgs. |
“Zimmer VerSys Hip System Cemented Hip Prosthesis”, Traditional Design, Innovative Features, 97-7853-01 16MIL, Zimmer, Inc, (1999), 4 pgs. |
“Zimmer VerSys Hip System, Cemented Hip Prosthesis”, Brochure, Traditional Design, Innovative Features, 97-7853-01 16MIL, Inc., (1999), 4 pgs. |
“Zimmer VerSys Hip System, Fiber Metal Taper HP Prosthesis”, Versatile Total Hip Solutions Using Proven Designs and Enhanced Fixation, 97-7862-01 20 MIP, Zimmer, Inc., (1997), 4 pgs. |
“Zimmer VerSys Hip System, LD/FX Hip Prostheses”, Versatile Solutions for Total and Partial Hip Replacement, 97-7831-01 Rev. 1, 15MM, Zimmer, Inc., Brochure, (1998), 4 pgs. |
Page, John, “Included Angle”, The Math Open Reference Project [Online]. Retrieved from the Internet: <http://www.mathopenref.com/angleincluded.html>, (Jun. 11, 2007), 1 pg. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20150025649 A1 | Jan 2015 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 13465172 | May 2012 | US |
Child | 14510695 | US | |
Parent | 12880365 | Sep 2010 | US |
Child | 13465172 | US | |
Parent | 11063030 | Feb 2005 | US |
Child | 12880365 | US |