Any and all applications for which a foreign or domestic priority claim is identified in the Application Data Sheet as filed with the present application are hereby incorporated by reference under 37 CFR 1.57.
Field of the Invention
The present application is directed to systems and methods for joint replacement, in particular to systems and methods for hip joint replacement which utilize a surgical orientation device or devices.
Description of the Related Art
Joint replacement procedures, including hip joint replacement procedures, are commonly used to replace a patient's joint with a prosthetic joint component or components. Specifically, the hip joint often requires replacement in the form of prosthetic components due to strain, stress, wear, deformation, misalignment, and/or other conditions in the joint. Prosthetic hip joint components can be designed to replace, for example, an acetabular prosthetic socket in the hip and/or a femoral head.
Current systems and methods often use expensive, complex, bulky, and/or massive computer navigation systems which require a computer or computers, as well as three dimensional imaging, to track a spatial location and/or movement of a surgical instrument or landmark in the human body. These systems are used generally to assist a user to determine where in space a tool or landmark is located, and often require extensive training, cost, and room.
Where such complex and costly systems are not used, simple methods are used, such as “eyeballing” the alignment of a prosthetic acetabular cup or femoral broach. These simple methods are not sufficiently accurate to reliably align and place implant components and the bones to which such components are attached.
Correct positioning of surgical instruments and implants, as used in a surgical procedure with respect to the patient's anatomy, is therefore often an important factor in achieving a successful outcome. In certain orthopedic implant procedures, such as total hip replacement (THR) or arthroplasty, total knee arthroplasty (TKA), high tibial osteotomy (HTO), and total shoulder replacement (TSR), for example, the optimal orientation of the surgical implant can enhance initial function and long term operability of the implant. A misaligned acetabular prosthetic cup can lead to complications such as dislocation of the hip joint, decreased joint motion, joint pain, and hastened failure of the implant.
Accordingly, there is a lack of devices, systems and methods that can be used to accurately position components of prosthetic joints without overly complicating the procedures, crowding the medical personnel, and/or burdening the physician or health-care facility with the great cost of complex navigation systems. Thus, there is a need in the art for improved systems and methods for obtaining accurate orientation of surgical instruments and implants during various orthopedic repair and replacement procedures, including total hip replacement (“THR”). Furthermore, there is a need for such devices and methods to be simple and easy to operate.
In accordance with at least one embodiment, an apparatus for preparing a hip joint can comprise a reference post having a distal end adapted to be driven into a portion of a pelvic bone, a proximal end, and a reference post body extending along a longitudinal axis between the proximal and distal ends, a coupling device disposed adjacent to the proximal end of the reference post adapted for connecting the reference post body to a second surgical component, and an orientation sensor coupled with the reference post.
In accordance with another embodiment, an apparatus for preparing a hip joint can comprise a mounting structure having a first end adapted to secure to a patient's anatomy and a second end disposed away from the first end, an elongate member having a first end and a second end, the first end of the elongate member adapted to connect to the second end of the mounting structure, a marking device coupled with the second end of the elongate member for visually indicating the position of an anatomical landmark during a procedure, and a surgical orientation device coupled with the elongate member for movement therealong for measuring at least one of position and orientation along the elongate member.
In accordance with another embodiment, an apparatus for assessing the orientation of an acetabular landmark or an acetabular implant can comprise a handling device comprising a proximal end with a handle, a distal end, and an elongate member extending therebetween, an acetabular landmark contacting device coupled with the distal end of the handling device, and a surgical orientation device for detecting and recording an orientation of the acetabular landmark or the acetabular implant.
In accordance with another embodiment, an acetabular surface preparation apparatus can comprise a handling device comprising a proximal end with a handle, a distal end, and a rotatable shaft extending therebetween, a surface preparation device coupled with the distal end and adapted to remove bone from the acetabulum to create a surface suitable for receiving an acetabular implant, a sleeve disposed around the rotatable shaft and adapted to remain stationary while the shaft is rotating, and a surgical orientation device coupled with the sleeve such that the orientation device can remain stationary while the rotatable shaft is rotated.
In accordance with another embodiment, an acetabular implant placement device can comprise a handling device comprising a proximal end with a handle, a distal end, and an elongate member extending therebetween, wherein the distal end comprises an implant contacting structure adapted to couple with an acetabular implant, and a surgical orientation device coupled with the handling device such that the orientation of at least one of the handling device and the surgical orientation device can be monitored as the acetabular implant is advanced into the acetabulum.
In accordance with another embodiment, a method for preparing a patient's hip for receiving an implant can comprise providing a first orthopedic system comprising a reference post comprising an orientation sensor, an impactor coupled with the reference post, a first angle assessment guide, and a portable surgical orientation device attached to the angle assessment guide, attaching the reference post to a hip bone of the patient, measuring and recording a reference distance from the reference post to an anatomical landmark using the portable surgical orientation device, removing the angle assessment guide, impactor, and portable surgical orientation device from the reference post, providing a second orthopedic system comprising an alignment guide, a second angle assessment guide attached to the alignment guide, and the portable surgical orientation device attached to the alignment guide, measuring an orientation of an anatomical plane using the second angle assessment guide, orienting an implant relative to the anatomical plane and inserting the implant into the acetabulum using the second orthopedic system, attaching a femoral broach to the patient's femur, the femoral broach including a head, positioning the head in the implant, providing the first orthopedic system a second time, and measuring changes in the reference distance.
In accordance with another embodiment, a method for preparing a patient's hip for receiving an implant can comprise attaching a first orthopedic system to the patient's hip with a reference device, the first orthopedic system comprising a portable surgical orientation device, measuring and recording a reference distance from the reference device to an anatomical landmark using the portable surgical orientation device, measuring an orientation of an anatomical plane on the patient's hip using a second orthopedic system, the second orthopedic system comprising the portable surgical orientation device, orienting an implant relative to the anatomical plane using the second orthopedic system, inserting the implant into the acetabulum, inserting a prosthetic femoral head into the implant, and measuring changes in the reference distance using the first orthopedic system.
In accordance with another embodiment, a method for positioning a patient in a hip procedure can comprise advancing a reference device into a patient's pelvic bone, coupling a surgical orientation device with the reference device such that the orientation device is not moveable relative to the pelvic bone, measuring at least one of the position or orientation of at least a portion of the patient's hip joint using the surgical orientation device, and moving the patient's hip joint to selected position the patient relative to a fixed reference frame based on the measurement on the surgical orientation device.
In accordance with another embodiment, a method for assessing relative position of portions of a hip joint can comprise coupling a surgical orientation device to a first bone of a patient's hip at a first location with a reference device, measuring a reference distance from the reference device to an anatomical landmark of a second bone using the surgical orientation device, performing a hip procedure, and after performing the hip procedure, confirming the position of the anatomical landmark relative to the first location.
In accordance with another embodiment, a method of placing an acetabular implant can comprise providing an orientation apparatus comprising an elongate member having a handle disposed at a proximal end, an angle assessment device disposed at a distal end, and a surgical orientation device, advancing the angle assessment device into contact with an anatomical landmark of the acetabulum while measuring orientation of the landmark, preparing the acetabulum for receiving the acetabular implant, placing the acetabular implant within the acetabulum, and advancing the angle assessment device into contact with the acetabular implant to confirm the orientation of the implant.
In accordance with another embodiment, a method of preparing an acetabular surface for receiving an acetabular implant can comprise providing a handle, a shaft rotatably coupled with the handle, a reamer coupled a distal end of the shaft, and an orientation device coupled in a fixed position relative to the handle, providing contact between the reamer and an acetabular surface while rotating the shaft and reamer to remove bone within the acetabulum, and measuring the orientation of the reamer while providing contact between the reamer and an acetabular surface.
Although certain preferred embodiments and examples are disclosed below, it will be understood by those skilled in the art that the inventive subject matter extends beyond the specifically disclosed embodiments to other alternative embodiments and/or uses of the inventions, and to obvious modifications and equivalents thereof. Thus it is intended that the scope of the inventions herein disclosed should not be limited by the particular disclosed embodiments described below. Thus, for example, in any method or process disclosed herein, the acts or operations making up the method/process may be performed in any suitable sequence, and are not necessarily limited to any particular disclosed sequence. For purposes of contrasting various embodiments with the prior art, certain aspects and advantages of these embodiments are described where appropriate herein. Of course, it is to be understood that not necessarily all such aspects or advantages may be achieved in accordance with any particular embodiment. Thus, for example, it should be recognized that the various embodiments may be carried out in a manner that achieves or optimizes one advantage or group of advantages as taught herein without necessarily achieving other aspects or advantages as may be taught or suggested herein.
The following sections describe in detail systems and methods for a hip replacement procedure. The orthopedic systems described herein include orthopedic systems and orthopedic devices for preparing the hip to receive prosthetic components. The systems include but are not limited to orthopedic systems 10, 110, 210, 310, and 410 described herein, each of which can be used during various stages of an orthopedic procedure or procedures, such as for example a total hip replacement procedure. These orthopedic systems and devices can be used to perform minimally invasive, cost-efficient, successful orthopedic procedures.
A number of different orthopedic systems are discussed below. These systems are useful, for example, for modifying the natural hip joint to enable the hip joint to have a prosthetic component or components, such components including but not limited to a prosthetic acetabular cup.
A. Orthopedic System for Establishing a Reference Location on the Patient's Anatomy
With reference to
1. Device for Use as a Reference in the Patient's Anatomy
The system 10 can comprise a device or component that serves as a reference for other systems or devices. For example, and as illustrated in
In one technique, the impactor 16 is used to assist in placement of the reference post 14. With continued reference to
2. Device for Angle Assessment Relative to Operating Table
The system 10 can further comprise a device which can be used to orient the patient's pelvis relative to the operating table. For example, and as described further herein, the angle assessment guide 18 can be used to orient the patient's pelvis. The angle assessment guide 18 can comprise a member 19, an attachment structures 26, and an end member 28. The attachment structure 26 can couple (e.g. attach, releasably attach) the angle assessment guide 18 to the impactor 16 and/or reference post 14 at a certain angle “a”. The angle “a” can be any of a number of angles, and preferably 45 degrees.
3. Surgical Orientation Device
With continued reference to
For example,
The surgical orientation device 12 can be used, for example, to identify an orientation of an anatomical plane, such as for example a plane defined by landmarks on a patient's acetabular rim. The surgical orientation device 12 can be used, for example, to measure distances, such as for example a distance between the reference post 14 and an anatomical landmark or landmarks on the patient's anatomy. Other uses are also possible. Furthermore, the surgical orientation device 12, as described herein, can be used alone or in conjunction with other devices, components, and/or systems, including but not limited to the sensor(s) 15 on the reference post 14, if included.
In a preferred arrangement, the surgical orientation device 12 can comprise a generally rectangular-shaped structure having an outer housing 30. The outer housing 30, as well as its contents can be portable. The outer housing 30 can be comprised, at least in part, of plastic including but not limited to ABS, polycarbonate, or other suitable material. The surgical orientation device 12 can be configured for hand-held use. The surgical orientation device 12 can be configured for mounting to other surgical devices, as discussed below.
With continued reference to
The surgical orientation device 12 can further comprise at least one user input device 36. The at least one user input device 36 can comprise a plurality of buttons located adjacent the display 34. The buttons can be activated, for example, by a finger, hand, and/or instrument to select a mode or modes of operation of the device 12, as discussed further below. In a preferred arrangement, the at least one user input comprises three buttons located underneath the display 34 as illustrated in
As discussed below, the surgical orientation device 12 can include a user interface with which a clinician can interact during a procedure. In one embodiment, the display 34 and at least one user input 36 can form a user interface. The user interface can allow a surgeon, medical personnel, and/or other user to operate the surgical orientation device 12 with ease, efficiency, and accuracy. Specific examples and illustrations of how the user interface can operate in conjunction with specific methods are disclosed further herein.
The attachment structures 38 can be formed, for example, from protruding portions of the back side of the surgical orientation device 12, and can extend partially, or entirely, along the back side of the surgical orientation device 12. The attachment structures 38 can receive corresponding, or mating, structures from the coupling device 14, so as to couple, or lock, the coupling device to the surgical orientation device 12.
In general, the electronic control unit 1102 can receive input from the sensor(s), the external memory 1112, the user input devices 1114 and/or the I/O ports 1118 and controls and/or transmits output to the visible alignment indicators 1106, the display 1110, the external memory 1112, the other output devices 1116 and/or the I/O ports 1118. The electronic control unit 1102 can be configured to receive and send electronic data, as well as perform calculations based on received electronic data. In certain embodiments, the electronic control unit 1102 can be configured to convert the electronic data from a machine-readable format to a human readable format for presentation on the display 1110. The electronic control unit 1102 can comprise, by way of example, one or more processors, program logic, or other substrate configurations representing data and instructions, which can operate as described herein. In other embodiments, the electronic control unit 1102 can comprise controller circuitry, processor circuitry, processors, general purpose single-chip or multi-chip microprocessors, digital signal processors, embedded microprocessors, microcontrollers and/or the like. The electronic control unit 1102 can have conventional address lines, conventional data lines, and one or more conventional control lines. In yet other embodiments, the electronic control unit 1102 can comprise an application-specific integrated circuit (ASIC) or one or more modules configured to execute on one or more processors. In certain embodiments, the electronic control unit 1102 can comprise an AT91SAM7SE microcontroller available from Atmel Corporation.
The electronic control unit 1102 can communicate with internal memory and/or the external memory 1112 to retrieve and/or store data and/or program instructions for software and/or hardware. The internal memory and the external memory 1112 can include random access memory (“RAM”), such as static RAM, for temporary storage of information and/or read only memory (“ROM”), such as flash memory, for more permanent storage of information. In some embodiments, the external memory 1112 includes an AT49BV160D-70TU Flash device available from Atmel Corporation and a CY62136EV30LL-45ZSXI SRAM device available from Cypress Semiconductor Corporation. The electronic control unit 1102 can communicate with the external memory 1112 via an external memory bus.
In general, the sensor(s) 1104 can be configured to provide continuous real-time data to the surgical orientation device 12. The electronic control unit 1102 can be configured to receive the real-time data from the sensor(s) 1104 and to use the sensor data to determine, estimate, and/or calculate an orientation (e.g. position) of the surgical orientation device 12. The orientation information can be used to provide feedback to a user during the performance of a surgical procedure, such as a total hip replacement surgery, as described in more detail herein.
In some arrangements, the one or more sensors 1104 can comprise at least one orientation sensor configured to provide real-time data to the electronic control unit 1102 related to the motion, orientation (e.g. position) of the surgical orientation device 12. For example, a sensor module 1104 can comprise at least one gyroscopic sensor, accelerometer sensor, tilt sensor, magnetometer and/or other similar device or devices configured to measure, and/or facilitate determination of, an orientation of the surgical orientation device 12. The term “module” as used herein can include, but is not limited to, software or hardware components which perform certain tasks. Thus, a module can include object-oriented software components, class components, procedures, subroutines, data structures, segments of program code, drivers, firmware, microcode, circuitry, data, tables, arrays, etc. Those with ordinary skill in the art will also recognize that a module can be implemented using a wide variety of different software and hardware techniques.
In some embodiments, the sensors 1104 can be configured to provide measurements relative to a reference point(s), line(s), plane(s), and/or gravitational zero. Gravitational zero, as referred to herein, refers generally to an orientation in which an axis of the sensor 1104 is perpendicular to the force of gravity, and thereby experiences no angular offset, for example tilt, pitch, roll, or yaw, relative to a gravitational force vector. In other embodiments, the sensor(s) 1104 can be configured to provide measurements for use in dead reckoning or inertial navigation systems.
In various embodiments, the sensor(s) 1104 comprise one or more accelerometers that measure the orientation of the surgical orientation device 12 relative to gravity. For example, the accelerometers can be used as tilt sensors to detect rotation of the surgical orientation device 12 about one or more of its axes. For example, the one or more accelerometers can comprise a dual axis accelerometer (which can measure rotation about two axes of rotation). The changes in orientation about the axes of the accelerometers can be determined relative to gravitational zero and/or to a reference plane registered during a tibial or femoral preparation procedure as described herein.
In certain embodiments, a multi-axis accelerometer (such as the ADXL203CE MEMS accelerometer available from Analog Devices, Inc. or the LIS331DLH accelerometer available from ST Microelectronics.) detects changes in orientation about two axes of rotation. For example, the multi-axis accelerometer can detect changes in angular position from a horizontal plane (e.g., anterior/posterior rotation) of the surgical orientation device 12 and changes in angular position from a vertical plane (e.g., roll rotation) of the surgical orientation device 12. The changes in angular position from the horizontal and vertical planes of the surgical orientation device 12 as measured by the sensor 1104 can be used to determine changes in orientation of the surgical orientation device 12.
In some arrangements, the sensors 1104 can comprise at least one single- or multi-axis gyroscope sensor and at least one single- or multi-axis accelerometer sensor. For example, a sensor module 1104 can comprise a three-axis gyroscope sensor (or three gyroscope sensors) and a three-axis accelerometer (or three accelerometer sensors) to provide orientational measurements for all six degrees of freedom of the surgical orientation device 12. In some embodiments, the sensors provide an inertial navigation or dead reckoning system to continuously calculate the orientation and velocity of the surgical orientation device 12 without the need for external references
In some embodiments, the sensors 1104 comprise one or more accelerometers and at least one magnetometer. The magnetometer can be configured to measure a strength and/or direction of one or more magnetic fields in the vicinity of the surgical orientation device 12. The magnetometer can advantageously be configured to detect changes in angular position about a vertical axis. In other embodiments, the sensors 1104 comprise one or more sensors capable of determining distance measurements. For example a sensor located in the surgical orientation device 12 can be in electrical communication (wired or wireless) with an emitter element mounted at the end of a measurement probe. For example, sensor 15 in reference post 14 can comprise an emitter element. In certain embodiments, the electrical control unit can be configured to determine the distance between the sensor and emitter (for example, an axial length of a measurement probe corresponding to a distance to an anatomical landmark, such as a bony eminence of the pelvis or femur, such as the greater or lesser trochanter).
In other embodiments, the one or more sensors 1104 can comprise a temperature sensor to monitor system temperature of the electrical system 1100. Operation of some of the electrical components can be affected by changes in temperature. The temperature sensor can be configured to transmit signals to the electronic control unit 1102 to take appropriate action. In addition, monitoring the system temperature can be used to prevent overheating. In some embodiments, the temperature sensor comprises a NCP21WV103J03RA thermistor available from Murata Manufacturing Co. The electrical system 1100 can further include temperature, ultrasonic and/or pressure sensors for measuring properties of biological tissue and other materials used in the practice of medicine or surgery, including determining the hardness, rigidity, and/or density of materials, and/or determining the flow and/or viscosity of substances in the materials, and/or determining the temperature of tissues or substances within materials.
In certain embodiments, the sensors 1104 can facilitate determination of an orientation of the surgical orientation device 12 relative to a reference orientation established during a preparation and alignment procedure performed during orthopedic surgery. Further details regarding the operation of the sensors in conjunction with a total hip replacement surgery are described herein.
The one or more sensors 1104 can form a component of a sensor module that comprises at least one sensor, signal conditioning circuitry, and an analog-to-digital converter (“ADC”). In certain embodiments, the components of the sensor module 1104 are mounted on a stand-alone circuit board that is physically separate from, but in electrical communication with, the circuit board(s) containing the other electrical components described herein. In other embodiments, the sensor module is physically integrated on the circuit board(s) with the other electrical components. The signal conditioning circuitry of the sensor module can comprise one or more circuit components configured to condition, or manipulate, the output signals from the sensor(s) 1104. In certain embodiments, the signal conditioning circuitry comprises filtering circuitry and gain circuitry. The filtering circuitry can comprise one more filters, such as a low pass filter. For example, a 10 Hz single pole low pass filter can be used to remove vibrational noise or other low frequency components of the sensor output signals. The gain circuitry can comprise one or more operational amplifier circuits that can be used to amplify the sensor output signals to increase the resolution potential of the sensor. For example, the operational amplifier circuit can provide gain such that a 0 g output results in a midrange (e.g., 1.65 V signal), a +1 g output results in a full scale (e.g., 3.3 V) signal and a −1 g output results in a minimum (0 V) signal to the ADC input.
In general, the ADC of the sensor module can be configured to convert the analog output voltage signals of the sensor(s) 1104 to digital data samples. In certain embodiments, the digital data samples comprise voltage counts. The ADC can be mounted in close proximity to the sensor to enhance signal to noise performance. In certain embodiments, the ADC comprises an AD7921 two channel, 12-bit, 250 Kiloseconds per Sample ADC. In an arrangement having a 12-bit ADC can generate 4096 voltage counts. The ADC can be configured to interface with the electronic control unit 1102 via a serial peripheral interface port of the electronic control unit 1102. In other embodiments, the electronic control unit 1102 can comprise an on-board ADC that can be used to convert the sensor output signals into digital data counts.
With continued reference to
The power supply 1108 can comprise one or more power sources configured to supply DC power to the electronic system 1100 of the surgical orientation device 12. In certain embodiments, the power supply 1108 comprises one or more rechargeable or replaceable batteries and/or one or more capacitive storage devices (for example, one or more capacitors or ultracapacitors). In other embodiments, power can be supplied by other wired and/or wireless power sources. In preferred arrangements, the power supply 1108 comprises two AA alkaline, lithium, or rechargeable NIMH batteries. The surgical orientation device 12 can also include a DC/DC converter to boost the DC power from the power supply to a fixed, constant DC voltage output (e.g., 3.3 volts) to the electronic control unit 1102. In some embodiments, the DC/DC converter comprises a TPS61201DRC synchronous boost converter available from Texas Instruments. The electronic control unit 1106 can be configured to monitor the battery level if a battery is used for the power supply 1108. Monitoring the battery level can advantageously provide advance notice of power loss. In certain embodiments, the surgical orientation device 12 can comprise a timer configured to cause the surgical orientation device 12 to temporarily power off after a predetermined period of inactivity and/or to permanently power off after a predetermined time-out period.
As discussed above, the display 1110 can comprise an LCD or other type screen display. The electronic control unit 1102 communicates with the display via the external memory bus. In certain embodiments, the electronic system 1100 comprises a display controller and/or an LED driver and one or more LEDs to provide backlighting for the display 1110. For example, the display controller can comprise an LCD controller integrated circuit (“IC”) and the LED driver can comprise a FAN5613 LED driver available from Fairchild Semiconductor International, Inc. The electronic control unit 1102 can be configured to control the LED driver via a pulse width modulation port to control the brightness of the LED display. For example, the LED driver can drive four LEDs spaced around the display screen to provide adequate backlighting to enhance visibility. The display can be configured to display one or more on-screen graphics. The on-screen graphics can comprise graphical user interface (“GUI”) images or icons. The GUI images can include instructive images, such as illustrated surgical procedure steps, or visual indicators of the orientation information received from the sensor(s) 1104. For example, the display can be configured to display degrees and either a positive or negative sign to indicate direction of rotation from a reference plane and/or a bubble level indicator to aid a user in maintaining a particular orientation. The display can also be configured to display alphanumeric text, symbols, and/or arrows. For example, the display can indicate whether a laser is on or off and/or include an arrow to a user input button with instructions related to the result of pressing a particular button.
With continued reference to
The I/O ports 1118 of the electronic control unit 1102 can comprise a JTAG port and one or more serial communication ports. The JTAG port can be used to debug software installed on the electronic control unit 1102 during testing and manufacturing phases. The JTAG port can be configured such that it is not externally accessible post-manufacture. The serial communication ports can include a Universal Serial Bus (“USB”) port and/or one or more universal asynchronous receiver/transmitters (“UART”) ports. At least one of the UART ports can be accessible externally post-manufacture. The external UART port can be an infrared (“IR”) serial port in communication with an infrared (“IR”) transceiver. The IR serial port can be used to update the software installed on the electronic control unit 1102 post-manufacture and/or to test the operation of the electronic control unit 1102 by outputting data from the electronic control unit 1102 to an external computing device via an external wireless connection. Other types of I/O ports are also possible.
As described above, the sensor(s) 1104 can comprise one or more accelerometers. Accelerometers can measure the static acceleration of gravity in one or more axes to measure changes in tilt orientation. For example, a three-axis accelerometer can measure the static acceleration due to gravity along three orthogonal axes, as illustrated in
Multi-axis accelerometers can be conceptualized as having a separate accelerometer sensor for each of its axes of measurement, with each sensor responding to changes in static acceleration in one plane. In certain embodiments, each accelerometer sensor is most responsive to changes in tilt (i.e., operates with maximum or optimum accuracy and/or resolution) when its sensitive axis is substantially perpendicular to the force of gravity (i.e., when the longitudinal plane of the accelerometer sensor is parallel to the force of gravity) and least responsive when the sensitive axis is parallel to the force of gravity (i.e., when the longitudinal plane of the accelerometer sensor is perpendicular to the force of gravity).
As illustrated, the sensor board 46A is mounted at an approximately 22-degree angle relative to a plane extending longitudinally through the housing 30, which can be parallel to or correspond to an anterior-posterior axis of the main board 46B. As described above, mounting the sensor board 46A at an offset angle can enable the one or more sensors to operate in the regions of maximum or optimum sensitivity, accuracy and/or resolution. The particular mounting offset angle can be selected based on a range of motion of the surgical orientation device 12 during a particular orthopedic procedure. As shown in
For each axis of rotation measured (e.g., pitch and roll), the multi-axis accelerometer can continuously output an analog voltage signal. At Block 1205, the signal conditioning circuitry of the sensor module can filter the analog output voltage signal (e.g., with a low pass filter) to remove noise from the signal that may be present due to the high sensitivity of the multi-axis accelerometer. At Block 1210, the signal conditioning circuitry amplifies, or boosts, the output voltage signal, for example, via the gain circuitry described above.
At Block 1215, the ADC can convert the continuous analog voltage signal into a discrete digital sequence of data samples, or voltage counts. In certain embodiments, the ADC can sample the analog voltage signal once every two milliseconds; however, other sampling rates are possible. In certain embodiments, the analog voltage signal is oversampled. At Block 1220, the electronic control unit 1102 can generate a stable data point to be converted to an angle measurement. The electronic control unit 1102 can apply a median filter to the sampled data to eliminate outliers (e.g., spikes) in the data. For example, the electronic unit 1102 can use an 11-sample median filter to generate the middle value from the last 11 samples taken. The output of the median filter can then be fed into a rolling average filter (for example, a 128 sample rolling average filter). The rolling average filter can be used to smoothe or stabilize the data that is actually converted to an angle measurement. The electronic control unit 1102 can implement Blocks 1215 and 1220 using a finite impulse response (“FIR”) or an infinite impulse response (“IIR”) filter implemented in a software module.
At Block 1225, the electronic control unit 1102 can convert the voltage count data to an angle measurement in degrees. In performing the conversion, the electronic control unit 1102 can be configured to apply a calibration conversion algorithm based on a calibration routine performed during a testing phase prior to sale of the surgical orientation device 12. The calibration conversion can be configured to account for unit-to-unit variations in components and sensor placement. The calibration routine can be performed for each axis being monitored by the multi-axis accelerometer. The calibration conversion can comprise removing any mechanical or electrical offsets and applying an appropriate gain calibration for a positive or negative tilt.
As described above, the ADC can comprise an ADC with 12-bit resolution, which provides 4096 distinct voltage counts, wherein a −90 degree tilt corresponds to 0 counts (−2048 signed counts), a zero degree tilt corresponds to 2048 counts (0 signed counts), and a +90 degree tilt corresponds to 4096 counts (+2048 signed counts). The tilt angle for each axis (e.g., pitch and roll) of the multi-axis accelerometer can be calculated from the voltage count data based on standard trigonometric relationships as the arcsin of the acceleration component in each particular axis. In arrangements in which the electronic control unit 1102 applies the calibration conversion, the tilt angle for each axis can be calculated as follows:
where OFFSET corresponds with a zero offset of the surgical orientation device 12 determined during the calibration routine and GAIN corresponds with a ratiometric value determined during the calibration routine, with one GAIN value being used for negative tilt angles and a different GAIN value being used for positive tilt angles.
Also at Block 1225, in arrangements where a dual-axis accelerometer is used, the electronic control unit 1102 can be configured to adjust the pitch angle (x axis) calculation to account for the mounting offset angle (described above) of the dual-axis accelerometer relative to the outer housing 20 of the surgical orientation device 20. The result of Block 1225 is an absolute angle for each axis of rotation (e.g., pitch, roll) being monitored by the dual-axis accelerometer. The absolute pitch and roll angles can be used to calculate orientation measurements of the surgical orientation device 12.
Orientation measurements for the surgical orientation device 12 can be determined based on a wide variety of reference frames in conjunction with any of a variety of surgical procedures.
In certain embodiments, calculations can be performed by software modules executed by the electronic control unit 1102. In other embodiments, the electronic control unit 1102 can generate measurements using data stored in one or more look-up tables (“LUT”s). In other embodiments, other calculations can be derived based on the type of sensor or sensors used, the procedure being performed, and/or the reference frame being employed. Specific calculations in accordance with other procedures are described, for example, in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/509,388, filed Jul. 24, 2009, the contents of which are incorporated in their entirety by reference herein.
In certain embodiments, the electronic control unit 1102 can perform a stabilization routine, process, or algorithm to assess or determine the stability, or reliability, of the calculated angle measurements. For example, the electronic control unit 1102 can keep a history of the last 100 ms of calibrated sample data for each axis being monitored by the sensor(s) 40. Each time a new sample is added to the 100-sample history, a maximum and minimum value is determined for the 100-sample data set. The electronic control unit 1102 can then determine a delta difference between the maximum and minimum values. The electronic control unit 1102 can then compare the delta difference between the maximum and minimum values to a threshold. If the delta difference is lower than the threshold, then the data is considered to be stable and it is stored in memory (e.g., external memory 1112) and time-stamped. If the delta difference is greater than the threshold, then the data is considered to be unstable. When retrieving an angle reading to display to the user, the electronic control unit 1102 can be configured to transmit the last stable data reading (assuming it is not too old) to the display 1110 instead of the current unstable reading. If the last stable angle exceeds a time threshold, the unstable angle reading can be displayed along with a visual indication notifying the user that the angle reading is unstable. For example, a red “shaky hand” icon or graphical user interface image can be displayed on the display screen.
B. Orthopedic System for Measuring Distances in a Joint
With reference to
1. Device for Measuring Distances in a Joint
With continued reference to
The measuring device 112 can further include a hinge 115. The hinge 115 can allow the measuring device 112, or a portion of the measuring device 112, to be pivotably rotated relative to the reference post 14. In some embodiments, the measuring device 12 and marking device 118 can be both pivotably rotated about the hinge 115, as well as rotated about the coupling device 113. For example, the hinge 115 and coupling device 113 can allow for rotational movement of the marking device 118 in both a first plane, as well as a second plane orthogonal to the first plane. Thus, the measuring device 18 can be moved in at least two degrees of rotational freedom.
In some embodiments, the marking device 118 can comprise a laser device. For example, a laser can be emitted from a marking device 118 and/or measuring device 112. The laser can contact and/or reference an anatomical location, and such location can be used to obtain a measurement or measurements as described herein.
The measuring device 112 can further comprise an attachment structure 116. The attachment structure 116 can releasably attach the surgical orientation device 12 to the measuring device 112. The attachment structure 116 can comprise a coupling device or devices that allows the surgical orientation device 12 and/or marking device 118 to move relative to the measuring device 112. For example, in a preferred arrangement, when the reference post 14 is fixed into the patient's bony anatomy, the surgical orientation device 12 and marking device 118 can slide longitudinally along a length of the measuring device 112, thereby changing the relative distance between the reference post 14 and the marking device 118. The attachment device 116 can further allow the marking device 118 to be moved generally through a range of elevations so as to bring the marking device closer to or in contact with an anatomical landmark. As described above, the surgical orientation device 12 can be configured to detect translational changes. Thus, both the markings 114 and surgical orientation device itself can facilitate an accurate measurement of a distance between the proximal end 30 of reference post 14 and the marking device 118.
2. Device for Marking an Anatomical Landmark
With continued reference to
C. Orthopedic System for Determining an Orientation of a Plane in a Patient's Anatomy
With reference to
1. Anatomical Contact Device for Contacting a Landmark or Landmarks
With continued reference to
The anatomical contact device 214 can further comprise an anatomical contact component 218. The anatomical contact component 218 can comprise an acetabular landmark contacting device, and can be releasably coupled to the alignment handle 216, or can be integrally formed with the alignment handle 216. In a preferred arrangement, the component 218 can comprise a tripod-like structure, with three arms 220 extending radially outwardly from a center portion 222 of the component 218. Each of the three arms 220 can be spaced radially equally from one another at 120 degrees, although other arrangements are also possible, as are other numbers of arms 220. Each of the arms 220 can further be angled such that no one plane contains any two of the arms 220. Each of the arms 220 can comprise a tip 224. As described further herein, the tips 224 can be used to contact landmarks on the acetabular rim of the patient.
D. Orthopedic System for Preparing an Acetabular Surface
With reference to
1. Stationary Mount for the Surgical Orientation Device
With continued reference to
2. Acetabular Surface Preparation Device
With continued reference to
The surface preparation tool 314 can further comprise a surface preparation device 318. The surface preparation device 318 can be releasably coupled or integrally formed with the reamer handle 316, and can comprise a cutting tool or element which digs into and reams out bony matter and/or tissue in the patient's anatomy. For example, the surface preparation device 318 can comprise a generally spherical-shaped cutting tool which is configured to ream out an acetabular socket.
E. Orthopedic System for Orienting a Prosthetic Hip Component
With reference to
1. Device for Guiding a Prosthetic Component
With continued reference to
The distal end 418 can comprise a implant contacting structure which releasably couples the guide device 412 to the prosthetic component 414. While coupled, the prosthetic component 414 can move with the guide device 412. Once oriented, the prosthetic component 414 can be released from the guide device 412.
2. Prosthetic Component for Insertion in the Patient's Anatomy
The prosthetic component 414 can comprise any of a number of commonly available prosthetics, including but not limited to prosthetic acetabular cups. The acetabular cup size can vary depending upon the patient. The prosthetic component 414 can be sized and shaped so as to fit into the area reamed out by orthopedic system 310.
A number of different hip preparation methods are discussed below. These methods can be used in conjunction with the systems described above, and are useful for modifying the natural hip joint to enable the hip joint to have a prosthetic component or components, such components including but not limited to a prosthetic acetabular cup.
A. Pre-Operative Planning
Prior to any hip procedure, a surgeon or other medical personnel can create templates of a patient's anatomy, and use these templates to determine ideal post-procedure conditions within the patient's anatomy. For example, in a hip replacement procedure, the surgeon can first obtain x-ray images of the patient's pelvis. Based on the images, the surgeon can look at a diseased side of the hip, as well as the healthy side, and determine goals for joint offset and leg length.
Similarly, leg length can be represented by the arrows “LL” in
When viewing the pre-operative x-rays, the surgeon can get an idea of what changes in joint offset and leg length will be necessary on the diseased side of the hip to bring the hip into symmetry (e.g. both sides of the hip having the same leg length and joint offset). If both sides of the hip are not brought into symmetry, the joint offset on the diseased side of the hip can cause wear and deterioration of the surrounding ligaments.
B. Establishing a Reference for Hip Replacement Using an Orthopedic System
With reference to
Once a landmark is chosen, the surgeon can use a slap hammer or other device to pound the impactor 16 and drive the reference post 14 into the patient's anatomy as desired, until the reference post 14 is firmly in place. If the reference post 14 has a sensor 15 on or embedded within or otherwise coupled to the reference post 14, the sensor 15 can be at least partially within the bony mass of the pelvis (or other bony area), or can still be exterior of the anatomy after insertion of the reference post 14. In some embodiments, the reference post 14 can comprise a retractor. For example, with the surrounding tissue pulled back, the reference post 14 can be configured as an anchor or as a retractor to at least partially hold back the tissue that would normally be disposed above or around the surgical site.
With reference to
Once the surgical orientation device 12 is registered, and the reference post 14 has been driven into the iliac spine, the pelvis can be adjusted and moved relative to a fixed reference frame. Because the angle α described above and shown in
As described above, the reference post 14 can contain a sensor or sensors 15 that evaluate the orientation (e.g. position or angle) of the pelvis or other bony area. For example, once the pelvis has been positioned generally parallel to the operating table and floor, the sensor or sensors 15 can be zeroed and/or registered by the surgical orientation device 12 or other device. In a preferred arrangement, the sensor 15 can communicate with the surgical orientation device 12, giving the surgical orientation device 12 information about the orientation of the iliac spine and/or pelvis. If the pelvis moves during the hip procedure, the surgical orientation device 12 can account for such movement since it has information about such movement from sensor 15. Furthermore, the surgical orientation device 12 can additionally obtain information about the spatial location of the reference post 14 based on the sensor or sensors 15, and can use that information to obtain and record measurements of distance between the reference post 14 and surgical orientation device 12. In some embodiments, the sensor 15 can comprise a satellite sensor which communicates with the surgical orientation device 12, and is separately read by the surgical orientation device 12. In some embodiments, the surgical orientation device 12 and reference post 14 can each comprise a sensor or sensors. In some embodiments the surgical orientation device 12 can be configured to only receive information from the sensor 15, and does not itself have an orientation sensor. Furthermore, in some embodiments, more than one sensor can be used. For example, the systems described herein can comprise two or more sensors 15 located on the pelvis, greater trochanter, and/or other anatomical landmarks.
In one embodiment, a first satellite sensor is the sensor 15 coupled with the reference post 14, a second satellite sensor is coupled with another surgical device, and both satellite sensors provide sensor data to a variation of the surgical orientation device 12. Where two satellite sensors are provided, one can be coupled with a first bone adjacent to a joint and a second can be coupled with a second bone adjacent to a joint. With two satellite sensors, the position, orientation, or movement of these bones and the joint to which they are adjacent can be monitored.
With the reference post 14 thus positioned, the impactor 16, angle assessment guide 18, and surgical orientation device 12 can be removed, leaving only the reference post 14 behind. The reference post 14 can then serve as a reference as described above, and can be used as an anchoring point for attachment of the orthopedic system 110.
In one embodiment, the fixture 510 includes a bone engagement portion 514 that is configured to engage the bone in a static manner. For example, the bone engagement portion 514 can comprise a clamping structure that generates sufficient normal force to provide secure frictional engagement with the femur or other anatomy. In some embodiments, the clamping structure is spring loaded or includes a ratchet design to allow for quick attachment with sufficient force for immobilizing the fixture 510.
The fixture 510 preferably also is configured to securely receive the reference post 14. For example, a mounting structure 518 can be coupled with the bone engagement portion 514 and disposed laterally. The bone engagement portion 514 provides a surface area into which the reference post 14 can be driven using a slap hammer or other device for transmitting a force to the distal end of the reference post 14. For example, the impactor 16 can be coupled with the reference post 14, as described herein, prior to driving the distal end of the reference post 14 into the mounting structure 518. In other techniques, the distal end of the reference post 14 can be coupled with the mounting structure 518 by clamping or other techniques that do not require applying a driving force, as with a slap hammer.
In the technique of
C. Measuring Joint Distances Using an Orthopedic System
With reference to
The surgical orientation device 12 can have two linear measurement components, one which responds to leg length and one which responds to offset. While the lesser trochanter is described in terms of an anatomical landmark, a different anatomical landmark or landmarks can be used instead, including but not limited to the greater trochanter. In another embodiment, a satellite tiltmeter can be attached to the femur on a location such as the greater trochanter which allows the angle of the femur to be zeroed and later reproduced when these measurements are repeated at the trial reduction phase. This can eliminate small errors in leg-length and offset which can be caused movement of the femur. If attached to the greater trochanter, this could be designed so that it is not in the way during the procedure.
The distance between the reference post 14 and the superior aspect of the lesser trochanter can be correlated, or related to, anatomical distances such as leg length and joint offset as described above. For example, and as described above, such distance can be assessed by the medical provider in a pre-operative x-ray assessment. With reference to again to
D. Determining the Orientation of an Anatomical Plane Using an Orthopedic System
With reference to
With reference to
In some embodiments, and as described herein, the surgical orientation device 12 can include a light indicator, such as a laser or lasers. The lasers can be emitted from optical components 42 of the surgical orientation device. Thus, in some embodiments of the orthopedic system 110, the surgical orientation device, or other component, can emit a laser or lasers towards a landmark or landmarks in order to obtain an orientation of the acetabular rim. For example, the lasers can be emitted from the surgical orientation device such that they pinpoint an area or areas along the acetabular rim, and provide an indication to the surgical orientation device 12 of the orientation of a plane extending across the rim. In other embodiments, different landmarks can be used.
E. Preparing a Portion of the Patient's Anatomy Using an Orthopedic System
With reference to
Once the orthopedic system 210 has established a reference plane, such as for example the plane defined by the three reference landmarks on the acetabular rim, the reamer 318 can be moved into the area bounded by the acetabular rim. The surgeon can hold the reamer handle 316, and the reamer 318 and/or a portion or portions of the reamer handle 316 can spin and rotate. As the reamer 318 spins and digs into the bony area in the acetabulum, the surgical orientation device 12 can remain generally still while coupled to the mounting device 312. The surgeon can use the surgical orientation device 12 to monitor the orientation of the reamer 318. Thus, the surgeon can ream at a defined angle relative to the aforementioned reference plane, with the surgical orientation device 12 providing an indication or indications on its display as to whether the reamer 318 is reaming perpendicular to such plane, or at an some angle relative to the plane. In some embodiments, the surgeon can choose an appropriate angle based on pre-operative templates and/or a desired range of angles and movement for the implant 414.
F. Orienting a Prosthetic Component Using an Orthopedic System
With reference to
Once the orthopedic system 310 has been used to ream out an acetabular socket, the orthopedic system 410 can be assembled. For example, the surgical orientation device 12 can be releasably coupled to the handle 416, and a prosthetic component 414 can be releasably coupled to the handle 416. The surgeon can then hold onto the handle 416 and move the prosthetic component 414 (e.g. prosthetic acetabular cup) towards the reamed out acetabular socket. The surgical orientation device 12 can be used to monitor the orientation of the prosthetic component 414 as it is moved and adjusted within the acetabulum. One can use a laser line (or other probe, such as for example a mechanical probe) to illuminate or otherwise reference a mark made earlier to control the rotation of the surgical orientation device 12 about a vertical axis. One can also use the orientation of the reference post 14 to compensate for movement of the pelvis. Once the prosthetic component 414 is positioned as desired (e.g. based on a pre-operative determination), the handle 416 and surgical orientation device 12 can be removed.
In some embodiments, the orthopedic system 210 can then be used again to assess the orientation of the prosthetic component, as illustrated in
G. Measuring Joint Distances Again Using an Orthopedic System
With reference to
With reference to
With reference to
While the embodiments of the orthopedic systems and methods described above are described as having and using a sensor or sensors 50 located within the surgical orientation device 12, in some embodiments the orthopedic systems or other systems used for joint replacement can include an additional sensor or sensors 50 or 15. For example, and as described above, the reference post 14 can include a sensor 15. These additional sensors can be located on other surgical components and/or anatomical landmarks. U.S. Pat. No. 7,559,931 discloses examples of sensors on multiple surgical components and/or anatomical landmarks, and is herein expressly incorporated by reference in its entirety. In some embodiments, the orthopedic systems can include an additional sensor or sensors on the femur, hip, or other anatomical locations. The additional sensor can include a microcontroller and/or communication device (e.g. infrared or other wireless technology (e.g. Bluetooth™)) which can relay information from the additional sensor to the electronic control unit 1102 of the surgical orientation device 12. This additional sensor or sensors can detect changes in movement of the patient's anatomy during an orthopedic procedure, so as to verify whether the patient's anatomy has moved or changed position during the procedure. In some embodiments, the sensor or sensors described herein (e.g. sensor 15) can be part of a variable capacitance system similar to that used in digital calipers.
The electronic control unit 1102 can be configured to receive the information from this additional sensor or sensors, and/or the sensor's communications device, and combine that information with information from the sensor or sensors 50 located within the surgical orientation device 12 to calculate an overall, or aggregate, movement and orientation of the surgical orientation device 12 relative to, for example, an axial line or plane. The electronic control unit 1102 can correct for changes in position of the surgical orientation device 12.
Additionally, the additional sensor or sensors can be located in a device. The device can be constructed such that the device is autoclavable and reusable, and can allow insertion and removal of a disposable battery. The additional sensor or sensors can be incorporated with any of the systems and/or methods described herein, and can be placed on any of the components of the systems described herein.
The systems and methods described above can each incorporate the use of a measuring device, such as for example the surgical orientation device 12. As described above, the surgical orientation device 12 can comprise at least one user input, a display and an electronic control unit. The user inputs and display, and/or the combination of the inputs, display, and electronic control unit can together form part of an interactive user interface. For example, the interactive user interface can comprise a housing (e.g., housing 30 described above), a coupling member formed on or within the housing configured to removably couple the user interface to an orthopedic device (e.g., handle 416), a sensor (e.g., sensor 50 described above), an electronic control unit (e.g., electronic control unit 1102 described above), a user input (e.g., user input 36 described above, which can transmit input commands to the electronic control unit), and a display (e.g., display 34 described above).
The interactive user interface can comprise a graphical user interface having an interactive window displaying on-screen graphics. For example, the interactive user interface can provide the user with a plurality of screen displays. The screen displays can illustrate the steps to be performed in a surgical procedure and can guide the user through the performance of the steps. Each screen display can comprise one or more on-screen graphics. The on-screen graphics can comprise one or more visual cues or indicators to prompt the user as to what step or steps to take next during one of the procedural methods described above. The visual cues referenced herein can comprise instructive images, diagrams, pictoral representations, icons, animations, visual cues, charts, numerical readings, measurements, textual instructions, warnings (visual and/or audible), or other data. The interactive user interface can be configured to alter attributes (e.g., color) of the on-screen graphics according to one or more data protocols. The interactive user interface can provide visual feedback to the user during performance of one or more surgical procedures. In certain embodiments, the interactive user interface can be configured to generate graphical user interface (“GUI”) images to be displayed to the user. As described above, the user can interact with the surgical orientation device 12 via one or more user input devices 1114 (e.g., buttons, switches, touchscreen displays, scroll wheel, track ball, keyboard, remote controls, a microphone in conjunction with speech recognition software). The interactive user interface further can allow the user to confirm that a step has been completed (for example, by pressing a user input button). The interactive user interface can allow the user to enter data (e.g., a numerical value, such as a distance, an angle, and/or the like), verify a position of the surgical orientation device 12, turn a visible alignment indication system on and off, and/or turn the entire surgical orientation device on and off. In certain embodiments, the interactive user interface provides one or more drop-down lists or menus from which a user can make selections. For example, the user can make selections from a drop-down list using a scroll wheel, trackball, and/or a series of button presses. In some embodiments, the user interface provides a drop-down list of predicates that dynamically updates based on user input.
In at least one embodiment, a module for creating an interactive user interface can comprise a computer readable medium having computer readable program code embodied therein. The computer readable program code can comprise a computer readable program code configured to display one or more of a plurality of GUI images on a user interface of a surgical orientation device, the GUI images comprising instructive images related to the performance of a surgical procedure. The computer readable program code can be configured to receive instructions from a user identifying the surgical procedure to be performed (e.g., which joint and/or right or left). The computer readable program code can be configured to show the user steps to be performed in the identified process for the identified surgical procedure. The computer readable program code can be configured to guide the user in performance of the steps. For example, the computer readable program code can be configured to receive from the user an instruction to continue to the next step in the procedure, to receive orientation data from a sensor mounted within the surgical orientation device, and to display the orientation data on the user interface of the surgical orientation device.
In at least one embodiment, the surgical orientation device 12 described above can comprise a display module configured to display information and a sensor module configured to monitor the orientation of the surgical orientation device 12 in a three-dimensional coordinate reference system, and to generate orientation data corresponding to the monitored orientation of the surgical orientation device. The surgical orientation device 12 can further comprise a control module configured to receive the orientation data from the sensor module and convert it to objective signals for presentation on the display module, the control module also configured to display a set of GUI images or other on-screen graphics on the display module, the GUI images or on-screen graphics representing the orientation data received from the sensor module and also representing instructive images related to the performance of the joint replacement surgery.
In at least one embodiment, the surgical orientation device 12 can receive orientation data from a sensor module, receive input commands from a user input module to store orientation data from a user input module, convert the orientation data to a human readable format for presentation on a display device, and display on the display device on-screen graphics or GUI images for communicating information to a user based on the input commands and the orientation data, the information comprising instructive images for performing a joint replacement surgery and one or more visual indicators of a current orientation of the display device with respect to a fiducial, or reference, orientation.
In at least one embodiment, the surgical orientation device 12 described herein can comprise a sensor module coupled to an alignment jig and configured to measure and record a fiducial orientation and to continuously collect orientation data of the surgical orientation device, a display module configured to display at least one visual indicator of the orientation of the surgical orientation device with respect to the fiducial, or reference, orientation, the display module further configured to display instructive images of one or more steps to be performed by the surgeon during the joint replacement surgery, and a control module configured to receive the orientation data and to convert the orientation data to objective signals for presentation on the display module.
As shown in
Although these inventions have been disclosed in the context of certain preferred embodiments and examples, it will be understood by those skilled in the art that the present inventions extend beyond the specifically disclosed embodiments to other alternative embodiments and/or uses of the inventions and obvious modifications and equivalents thereof. In addition, while several variations of the inventions have been shown and described in detail, other modifications, which are within the scope of these inventions, will be readily apparent to those of skill in the art based upon this disclosure. It is also contemplated that various combinations or sub-combinations of the specific features and aspects of the embodiments can be made and still fall within the scope of the inventions. It should be understood that various features and aspects of the disclosed embodiments can be combined with or substituted for one another in order to form varying modes of the disclosed inventions. Thus, it is intended that the scope of at least some of the present inventions herein disclosed should not be limited by the particular disclosed embodiments described above.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3174080 | Eldon | Mar 1965 | A |
3670324 | Trevor, III | Jun 1972 | A |
4349018 | Chambers | Sep 1982 | A |
4421112 | Mains et al. | Dec 1983 | A |
4436099 | Raftopoulos | Mar 1984 | A |
4459985 | McKay et al. | Jul 1984 | A |
4475549 | Oh | Oct 1984 | A |
4501266 | McDaniel | Feb 1985 | A |
4509393 | Castiglione | Apr 1985 | A |
4518855 | Malak | May 1985 | A |
4524766 | Petersen | Jun 1985 | A |
4529348 | Johnson et al. | Jul 1985 | A |
4567885 | Androphy | Feb 1986 | A |
4567886 | Petersen | Feb 1986 | A |
4621630 | Kenna | Nov 1986 | A |
4646729 | Kenna | Mar 1987 | A |
4716894 | Lazzeri et al. | Jan 1988 | A |
4718078 | Bleidorn et al. | Jan 1988 | A |
4738253 | Buechel et al. | Apr 1988 | A |
4759350 | Dunn et al. | Jul 1988 | A |
4823807 | Russell et al. | Apr 1989 | A |
4938762 | Wehrli | Jul 1990 | A |
4944760 | Kenna | Jul 1990 | A |
4945799 | Knetzer | Aug 1990 | A |
4952213 | Bowman et al. | Aug 1990 | A |
5002547 | Poggie et al. | Mar 1991 | A |
5053037 | Lackey | Oct 1991 | A |
5065612 | Ooka et al. | Nov 1991 | A |
5122146 | Chapman et al. | Jun 1992 | A |
5129908 | Petersen | Jul 1992 | A |
5141512 | Farmer et al. | Aug 1992 | A |
5171244 | Caspari et al. | Dec 1992 | A |
5213112 | Niwa et al. | May 1993 | A |
5249581 | Horbal et al. | Oct 1993 | A |
5251127 | Raab | Oct 1993 | A |
5279309 | Taylor et al. | Jan 1994 | A |
5296855 | Matsuzaki et al. | Mar 1994 | A |
5306276 | Johnson et al. | Apr 1994 | A |
5320625 | Bertin | Jun 1994 | A |
5324293 | Rehmann | Jun 1994 | A |
5325029 | Janecke et al. | Jun 1994 | A |
5329933 | Graf | Jul 1994 | A |
5342367 | Ferrante et al. | Aug 1994 | A |
5343391 | Mushabac | Aug 1994 | A |
5358526 | Tornier | Oct 1994 | A |
5376093 | Newman | Dec 1994 | A |
5395377 | Petersen et al. | Mar 1995 | A |
5417694 | Marik et al. | May 1995 | A |
5423827 | Mumme | Jun 1995 | A |
5431653 | Callaway | Jul 1995 | A |
5462548 | Pappas et al. | Oct 1995 | A |
5468244 | Attfield et al. | Nov 1995 | A |
5474088 | Zaharkin et al. | Dec 1995 | A |
5486177 | Mumme et al. | Jan 1996 | A |
5514143 | Bonutti et al. | May 1996 | A |
5529070 | Augustine et al. | Jun 1996 | A |
5540696 | Booth, Jr. et al. | Jul 1996 | A |
5540697 | Rehmann et al. | Jul 1996 | A |
5553198 | Wang et al. | Sep 1996 | A |
5576727 | Rosenberg et al. | Nov 1996 | A |
5584837 | Petersen | Dec 1996 | A |
5597379 | Haines et al. | Jan 1997 | A |
5611353 | Dance et al. | Mar 1997 | A |
5624444 | Wixson et al. | Apr 1997 | A |
5628750 | Whitlock et al. | May 1997 | A |
5645077 | Foxlin | Jul 1997 | A |
5653764 | Murphy | Aug 1997 | A |
5681316 | DeOrio et al. | Oct 1997 | A |
5683398 | Carls et al. | Nov 1997 | A |
5688282 | Baron et al. | Nov 1997 | A |
5720752 | Elliot et al. | Feb 1998 | A |
5724264 | Rosenberg et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
5748767 | Raab | May 1998 | A |
5769861 | Vilsmeier | Jun 1998 | A |
5776137 | Katz | Jul 1998 | A |
5788700 | Morawa et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
5824085 | Sahay et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5840047 | Stedham | Nov 1998 | A |
5880714 | Rosenberg et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5916219 | Matsuno et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
5919149 | Allum | Jul 1999 | A |
5935086 | Beacon et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5976156 | Taylor et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
6027507 | Anderson et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6036696 | Lambrecht et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6056756 | Eng et al. | May 2000 | A |
6090114 | Matsuno et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6094019 | Saiki | Jul 2000 | A |
6120509 | Wheeler | Sep 2000 | A |
6122538 | Sliwa, Jr. et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6126608 | Kemme et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6162191 | Foxin | Dec 2000 | A |
6167292 | Badano et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6171310 | Giordano | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6195615 | Lysen | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6197032 | Lawes et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6214013 | Lambrech et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6214014 | McGann | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6216029 | Paltieli | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6246898 | Vesely et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6258095 | Lombardo et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6261247 | Ishikawa et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6299646 | Chambat et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6332089 | Acker et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6348058 | Melken et al. | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6354011 | Albrecht | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6361506 | Saenger et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6361507 | Foxlin | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6361508 | Johnson et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6377839 | Kalfas et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6381485 | Hunter et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6383149 | DeMayo | May 2002 | B1 |
6395005 | Lovell | May 2002 | B1 |
6447448 | Ishikawa et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6468280 | Saenger et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6470207 | Simon et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6471637 | Green et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6473635 | Rasche | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6477400 | Barrick | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6477421 | Andersen et al. | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6478799 | Williamson | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6488713 | Hershnerger | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6499488 | Hunter et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6514259 | Picard et al. | Feb 2003 | B2 |
6527443 | Vilsmeier | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6551325 | Neubauer et al. | Apr 2003 | B2 |
6585666 | Suh et al. | Jul 2003 | B2 |
6595997 | Axelson, Jr. et al. | Jul 2003 | B2 |
6595999 | Marchione et al. | Jul 2003 | B2 |
6607487 | Chang et al. | Aug 2003 | B2 |
6640128 | Vilsmeier et al. | Oct 2003 | B2 |
6648896 | Overes et al. | Nov 2003 | B2 |
6679916 | Frankie et al. | Jan 2004 | B1 |
6685655 | DeMayo | Feb 2004 | B2 |
6685711 | Axelson et al. | Feb 2004 | B2 |
6711431 | Sarin et al. | Mar 2004 | B2 |
6712824 | Millard et al. | Mar 2004 | B2 |
6715213 | Richter | Apr 2004 | B2 |
6725080 | Melkent et al. | Apr 2004 | B2 |
6725173 | An | Apr 2004 | B2 |
6743235 | Rao | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6770078 | Bonutti | Aug 2004 | B2 |
6786877 | Foxlin | Sep 2004 | B2 |
6802864 | Tornier | Oct 2004 | B2 |
6820025 | Bachmann et al. | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6827723 | Carson | Dec 2004 | B2 |
6917827 | Kienzle, III | Jul 2005 | B2 |
6923817 | Carson et al. | Aug 2005 | B2 |
6928742 | Broers et al. | Aug 2005 | B2 |
6947783 | Immerz | Sep 2005 | B2 |
6986181 | Murphy et al. | Jan 2006 | B2 |
6997882 | Parker et al. | Feb 2006 | B1 |
7007699 | Martinelli et al. | Mar 2006 | B2 |
7021140 | Perkins | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7027477 | Sutter et al. | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7037310 | Murphy | May 2006 | B2 |
7048741 | Swanson | May 2006 | B2 |
7089148 | Bachmann et al. | Aug 2006 | B1 |
7094241 | Hodorek et al. | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7104998 | Yoon et al. | Sep 2006 | B2 |
7105028 | Murphy | Sep 2006 | B2 |
7194295 | Vilsmeier | Mar 2007 | B2 |
7209776 | Leitner | Apr 2007 | B2 |
7219033 | Kolen | May 2007 | B2 |
7273500 | Williamson | Sep 2007 | B2 |
7331932 | Leitner | Feb 2008 | B2 |
7344541 | Haines et al. | Mar 2008 | B2 |
7392076 | Moctezuma de La Barrera | Jun 2008 | B2 |
7396357 | Tornier et al. | Jul 2008 | B2 |
7444178 | Goldbach | Oct 2008 | B2 |
7468075 | Lang et al. | Dec 2008 | B2 |
7468077 | Rochetin | Dec 2008 | B2 |
7497029 | Plassky et al. | Mar 2009 | B2 |
7520880 | Claypool et al. | Apr 2009 | B2 |
7547307 | Carson et al. | Jun 2009 | B2 |
7559931 | Stone | Jul 2009 | B2 |
7578821 | Fisher et al. | Aug 2009 | B2 |
7611520 | Broers et al. | Nov 2009 | B2 |
7611522 | Gorek | Nov 2009 | B2 |
7621920 | Claypool et al. | Nov 2009 | B2 |
7623902 | Pacheco | Nov 2009 | B2 |
7726564 | Goldbach | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7776098 | Murphy | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7831292 | Quaid et al. | Nov 2010 | B2 |
7834847 | Boillot et al. | Nov 2010 | B2 |
7846092 | Murphy | Dec 2010 | B2 |
7857821 | Couture et al. | Dec 2010 | B2 |
7885705 | Murphy | Feb 2011 | B2 |
7970174 | Goldbach | Jun 2011 | B2 |
8057479 | Stone | Nov 2011 | B2 |
8057482 | Stone | Nov 2011 | B2 |
8078254 | Murphy | Dec 2011 | B2 |
8118815 | van der Walt | Feb 2012 | B2 |
8241296 | Wasielewski | Aug 2012 | B2 |
8265790 | Amiot et al. | Sep 2012 | B2 |
8267938 | Murphy | Sep 2012 | B2 |
8277455 | Couture et al. | Oct 2012 | B2 |
8282685 | Rochetin et al. | Oct 2012 | B2 |
8355773 | Leitner et al. | Jan 2013 | B2 |
8412308 | Goldbach | Apr 2013 | B2 |
8421854 | Zerkin | Apr 2013 | B2 |
8446473 | Goldbach | May 2013 | B2 |
8512346 | Couture | Aug 2013 | B2 |
8551108 | Pelletier et al. | Oct 2013 | B2 |
8588892 | Hladio et al. | Nov 2013 | B2 |
8690888 | Stein et al. | Apr 2014 | B2 |
8718820 | Amiot et al. | May 2014 | B2 |
8734432 | Tuma et al. | May 2014 | B2 |
8764758 | Echeverri | Jul 2014 | B2 |
8888786 | Stone | Nov 2014 | B2 |
8911447 | van der Walt et al. | Dec 2014 | B2 |
8974467 | Stone | Mar 2015 | B2 |
8974468 | Borja | Mar 2015 | B2 |
8998910 | Borja et al. | Apr 2015 | B2 |
9044218 | Young | Jun 2015 | B2 |
9192392 | van der Walt et al. | Nov 2015 | B2 |
9262802 | Aghazadeh | Feb 2016 | B2 |
9271756 | van der Walt et al. | Mar 2016 | B2 |
9339226 | van der Walt et al. | May 2016 | B2 |
9375178 | Aghazadeh | Jun 2016 | B2 |
9456769 | Stein et al. | Oct 2016 | B2 |
9549742 | Berend et al. | Jan 2017 | B2 |
9572586 | van der Walt et al. | Feb 2017 | B2 |
9649160 | van der Walt et al. | May 2017 | B2 |
9775725 | van der Walt et al. | Oct 2017 | B2 |
9855075 | van der Walt et al. | Jan 2018 | B2 |
9931059 | Borja | Apr 2018 | B2 |
20020077540 | Kienzle, III | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020103610 | Bachmann et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020107522 | Picard et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020133175 | Carson | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020198451 | Carson | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20030019294 | Richter | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030069591 | Carson et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030093080 | Brown et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20030105470 | White | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030120282 | Scouten et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030163142 | Paltieli et al. | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20030181919 | Gorek | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20030184297 | Jakab | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030199882 | Gorek | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030204965 | Hennessey | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20030229356 | Dye | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20040006393 | Burkinshaw | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040019382 | Amirouche et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040034313 | Leitner | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040039396 | Couture et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040068260 | Cossette et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040087958 | Myers et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
20040087962 | Gorek | May 2004 | A1 |
20040097952 | Sarin et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
20040102792 | Sarin et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
20040106916 | Quaid | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040147926 | Iversen | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040149036 | Foxlin et al. | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040152970 | Hunter et al. | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040153066 | Coon et al. | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040153079 | Tsougarakis et al. | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040181144 | Cinquin et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040201857 | Foxlin | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040230197 | Tornier et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040243148 | Wasielewski | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050021037 | McCombs et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050021044 | Stone et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050107799 | Graf et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050113846 | Carson | May 2005 | A1 |
20050149040 | Haines et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050197814 | Aram et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050209605 | Grimm et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050222574 | Giordano et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050234332 | Murphy | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050251026 | Stone | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20050251148 | Friedrich | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20060009780 | Foley et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060015018 | Jutras et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060015120 | Richard et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060020177 | Seo et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060064105 | Raistrick et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060084977 | Lieberman | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060089657 | Broers et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060094958 | Marquart et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
20060122491 | Murray et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060142656 | Malackowski et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060142657 | Quaid et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060161051 | Terrill-Grisoni et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060217733 | Plassky et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060217734 | Sanford et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060241639 | Kuczynski et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060270949 | Mathie et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060282023 | Leitner | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20070032748 | McNeil et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070043287 | Degraaf | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070043375 | Anissian | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070073296 | Panchbhavi | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070100346 | Wyss et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070162142 | Stone | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070179626 | de la Barrera et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070179628 | Rochetin | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070219559 | Heavener et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070219561 | Lavallee et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070226986 | Park et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070249967 | Buly et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070270718 | Rochetin et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070270973 | Johnson et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070287911 | Haid et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20080058945 | Hajaj et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080071195 | Cuellar et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080103509 | Goldbach | May 2008 | A1 |
20080162074 | Schneider | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080183179 | Siebel et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080195109 | Hunter et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080202200 | West | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080211768 | Breen et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080243127 | Lang et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080249394 | Giori et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080262812 | Arata et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080275451 | McAllister et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20080281328 | Lang et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20080285805 | Luinge et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20090000626 | Quaid et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090000627 | Quaid et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090012532 | Quaid et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090040224 | Igarashi et al. | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090076507 | Claypool et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090076519 | Iversen | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090088753 | Aram et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090171370 | Yoon et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090209884 | Van Vorhis et al. | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20090216247 | Collette | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20090216285 | Ek | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20090234360 | Alexander | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090247863 | Proulx et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090248044 | Amiot et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090264737 | Haechler et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090270864 | Poncet | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090270865 | Poncet et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090270868 | Park et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090270869 | Colquhoun et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090270874 | Santarella et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090270875 | Poncet | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090270928 | Stone et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090276054 | Clifford et al. | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20090281545 | Stubbs | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20090289806 | Thornberry | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20090292227 | Scholten et al. | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20090299416 | Haenni et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20090299483 | Amirouche et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20090306679 | Murphy | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20090312973 | Hatlestad et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20090318836 | Stone et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20090318930 | Stone et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20090318931 | Stone et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20090324078 | Wu et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20100016705 | Stone | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100023018 | Theofilos | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100063509 | Borja et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100064216 | Borja et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100069911 | Borja et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100076505 | Borja | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100100011 | Roche | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100100154 | Roche | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100113980 | Herr et al. | May 2010 | A1 |
20100121334 | Couture et al. | May 2010 | A1 |
20100137869 | Borja | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100137871 | Borja | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100153081 | Bellettre et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100179605 | Branch et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100182914 | DelRegno et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100192662 | Yanni | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100198067 | Mahfouz et al. | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100198275 | Chana et al. | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100204551 | Roche | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100204575 | Roche et al. | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100204955 | Roche et al. | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100211077 | Couture et al. | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100239996 | Ertl | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100249533 | Pierce et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100249534 | Pierce et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100249535 | Pierce et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100249659 | Sherman et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100249665 | Roche | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100249787 | Roche | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100249788 | Roche | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100249790 | Roche | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100249791 | Roche | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100250276 | Pierce et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100250284 | Roche et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100250571 | Pierce et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100256504 | Moreau-Gaudry et al. | Oct 2010 | A1 |
20100261998 | Stiehl | Oct 2010 | A1 |
20100268067 | Razzaque et al. | Oct 2010 | A1 |
20100298661 | McCombie et al. | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20100324457 | Bean et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20100326187 | Stein | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20100326194 | Stein et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20100326210 | Stein et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20100326211 | Stein | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20100327848 | Stein | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20100327880 | Stein | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20100328077 | Stein | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20100328098 | Stein et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20100331633 | Stein | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20100331663 | Stein | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20100331679 | Stein | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20100331680 | Stein | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20100331681 | Stein et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20100331682 | Stein et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20100331683 | Stein et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20100331685 | Stein et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20100331687 | Stein et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20100331704 | Stein et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20100331718 | Stein | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20100331733 | Stein | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20100331734 | Stein | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20100331735 | Stein | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20100331736 | Stein | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20100331737 | Stein et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20100331738 | Stein et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20100331894 | Stein | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20100332152 | Stein | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20110028865 | Luinge et al. | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110032184 | Roche et al. | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110093081 | Chana et al. | Apr 2011 | A1 |
20110213275 | Boos et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110218458 | Valin et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110218546 | De La Fuente Klein et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110275957 | Bhandari | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20120029389 | Amiot et al. | Feb 2012 | A1 |
20120053488 | Boutin et al. | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120053594 | Pelletier et al. | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120093377 | Tsougarakis et al. | Apr 2012 | A1 |
20120157887 | Fanson et al. | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120172712 | Bar-Tal | Jul 2012 | A1 |
20120203140 | Malchau et al. | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20130079678 | Stein et al. | Mar 2013 | A1 |
20130079679 | Roche et al. | Mar 2013 | A1 |
20130079680 | Stein et al. | Mar 2013 | A1 |
20130079790 | Stein et al. | Mar 2013 | A1 |
20130079791 | Stein et al. | Mar 2013 | A1 |
20130079793 | Stein et al. | Mar 2013 | A1 |
20130190887 | Fanson et al. | Jul 2013 | A1 |
20130274633 | Hladio et al. | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20140005673 | Pelletier et al. | Jan 2014 | A1 |
20140031672 | McCaulley et al. | Jan 2014 | A1 |
20140114179 | Muller et al. | Apr 2014 | A1 |
20140134586 | Stein et al. | May 2014 | A1 |
20140135658 | Hladio et al. | May 2014 | A1 |
20140135744 | Stein et al. | May 2014 | A1 |
20140135773 | Stein et al. | May 2014 | A1 |
20140136143 | Stein et al. | May 2014 | A1 |
20140182062 | Aghazadeh | Jul 2014 | A1 |
20140275940 | Hladio et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140276000 | Mullaney et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140276864 | Aghazadeh | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140303631 | Thornberry | Oct 2014 | A1 |
20140330281 | Aghazadeh | Nov 2014 | A1 |
20140364858 | Li et al. | Dec 2014 | A1 |
20150018718 | Aghazadeh | Jan 2015 | A1 |
20150127009 | Berend et al. | May 2015 | A1 |
20150150569 | van der Walt et al. | Jun 2015 | A1 |
20150238204 | Stone | Aug 2015 | A1 |
20160213383 | van der Walt et al. | Jul 2016 | A1 |
20160220318 | Falardeau et al. | Aug 2016 | A1 |
20160220385 | Falardeau et al. | Aug 2016 | A1 |
20160242934 | van der Walt et al. | Aug 2016 | A1 |
20160278943 | van der Walt et al. | Sep 2016 | A1 |
20170196571 | Berend et al. | Jul 2017 | A1 |
20170238946 | van der Walt et al. | Aug 2017 | A1 |
20170296203 | Stone | Oct 2017 | A1 |
20170296274 | van der Walt et al. | Oct 2017 | A1 |
20180153587 | Van Der Walt et al. | Jun 2018 | A1 |
20180168826 | van der Walt et al. | Jun 2018 | A1 |
20180193171 | van der Walt et al. | Jul 2018 | A1 |
20180206860 | van der Walt et al. | Jul 2018 | A1 |
20180296232 | Nielsen et al. | Oct 2018 | A1 |
20180296365 | Nielsen et al. | Oct 2018 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2241359 | Dec 1999 | CA |
2 594 874 | Jul 2006 | CA |
2 537 711 | Aug 2007 | CA |
4 225 112 | Dec 1993 | DE |
29704393 | Aug 1997 | DE |
198 30 359 | Jan 2000 | DE |
0 557 591 | Sep 1993 | EP |
0 651 968 | May 1995 | EP |
1 635 705 | Mar 2006 | EP |
1 817 547 | Apr 2012 | EP |
2 197 790 | Jun 1988 | GB |
2 511 885 | Sep 2014 | GB |
07-184929 | Jul 1995 | JP |
H08-240611 | Sep 1996 | JP |
2006-314775 | Nov 2006 | JP |
2007-503289 | Feb 2007 | JP |
2007-534351 | Nov 2007 | JP |
2008-537496 | Sep 2008 | JP |
2009-511136 | Mar 2009 | JP |
WO 9960939 | Dec 1999 | WO |
WO 2001030247 | May 2001 | WO |
WO 02000131 | Jan 2002 | WO |
WO 0217798 | Mar 2002 | WO |
WO 2004080323 | Sep 2004 | WO |
WO 2004112610 | Dec 2004 | WO |
WO 2005006993 | Jan 2005 | WO |
WO 2006119387 | Nov 2006 | WO |
WO 2007136784 | Nov 2007 | WO |
WO 2008073999 | Jun 2008 | WO |
WO 2008129414 | Oct 2008 | WO |
WO 2009117833 | Oct 2009 | WO |
WO 2010011978 | Jan 2010 | WO |
WO 2010030809 | Mar 2010 | WO |
WO 2011044273 | Apr 2011 | WO |
WO 2012006172 | Jan 2012 | WO |
WO 2012027815 | Mar 2012 | WO |
WO 2012027816 | Mar 2012 | WO |
WO 2012082164 | Jun 2012 | WO |
WO 2012113054 | Aug 2012 | WO |
WO 2013012561 | Jan 2013 | WO |
WO 2013169674 | Nov 2013 | WO |
WO 2013173700 | Nov 2013 | WO |
WO 2013188960 | Dec 2013 | WO |
WO 2014028227 | Feb 2014 | WO |
WO 2016070288 | May 2016 | WO |
WO 2016134168 | Aug 2016 | WO |
WO 2018169980 | Sep 2018 | WO |
WO 2018169995 | Sep 2018 | WO |
Entry |
---|
510 (k) Summary for Total Knee Surgetics Navigation System, in 5 pages. |
510 (k) Summary of Safety and Effectiveness for BrainLAB knee, in 5 pages. |
Anderson MD., Kevin, et al., “Computer Assisted Navigation in Total Knee Arthroplasty”, The Journal of Arthroplasty, 2005, vol. 20, No. 7, Suppl. 3, in 7 pages. |
Ang, et al., An Active Hand-Held Instrument for Enhanced Microsurgical Accuracy, Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention, 2000, vol. 1935, pp. 878-887. |
Arnold-Moore, et. al., Architecture of a Content Management Server for XML Document Applications, RMIT Multimedia Database Systems, Royal Melbourne Institute of Technology, Victoria Australia, in 12 pages. |
ArthroCAD, Enhancing orthopedic outcomes through optimal alignment, 2012, Pages in 2 pages. |
Bae et al., “Computer Assisted Navigation in Knee Arthroplasty”, Clinics in Orthopedic Surgery, 2011, vol. 3, pp. 259-267. |
Bargren, MD., et al,, Alignment in Total Knee Arthroplasty, Correlated Biomechanical and Clinical Observations, Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research, Mar. 1, 1983, Issue 173, pp. 178-183, Philadelphia. |
Bathis, H. et al., “Alignment in total knee arthroplasty”, The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery (Br), 2004, 86-B, pp. 682-687, British Editorial. |
Bhandari, Design and Prototype of a Computer Assisted Surgical Navigation System for Total Knee Replacement Surgery, May 12, 2009, Pages in 294 pages. |
Biomet Orthopedics, Inc, Vision Acetabular Surgical Techniques, website brochure, pp. 16 pages. |
Biomet Orthopedics, Inc., Universal Ringlock® Acetabular Series, vol. website brochure, pp. 13 pages. |
Brainlab, “Position Determination and Calibration in optical tracking systems”, FLORENUS the technology merchants, in 2 pages. |
Brainlab, “Tracking and imaging in Navigation”, FLORENUS, in 2 pages. |
Brennan, et al., Quantification of Inertial Sensor-Based 3D Joint Angle Measurement Accuracy Using and Instrumented Gimbal, Gait & Posture, May 23, 2011, vol. 34, pp. 320-323. |
Chauhan, et al., Computer-Assisted Knee Arthroplasty Versus a Conventional Jig-Based Technique, The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery, 2004, vol. 86-B, pp. 372-377. |
Cutti, et al., Motion Analysis of the Upper-Limb Based on Inertial Sensors: Part 1—Protocol Description, Journal of Biomechanics, Jan. 1, 2007, vol. 40, pp. S250. |
Decking, MD., et al., Leg Axis After Computer-Navigated Total Knee Arthroplasty, The Journal of Arthroplasty, 2005, vol. 20, Issue 3, pp. 282-288. |
Depuy, Johnson & Johnson, Co.,, Summit Cemented Hip System, website brochure, pp. 21 pages. |
De Momi, et al., “In-vitro experimental assessment of a new robust algorithm for hip joint centre estimation”, Journal of Biomechanics, Feb. 26, 2009, vol. 42, pp. 989-995. |
Digioia III, MD., et al., “Comparison of a Mechanical Acetabular Alignment Guide with Computer Placement of the Socket”, The Journal of Arthroplasty, Apr. 2002, vol. 17, No. 3, in 6 pages. |
Eric Foxlin, Chapter 7. Motion Tracking Requirements and Technologies, Handbook of Virtual Environment Technology, 2002, vol. Kay Stanney, Ed., Issue Lawrence Erlbaum Ass. |
Favre, et al., 3D Evaluation of the Knee Joint Using Ambulatory System: Application to ACL-Deficient Knees, Journal of Biomechanics, Jan. 1, 2007, vol. 40, pp. S251. |
Favre, et al., A New Ambulatory System for Comparative Evaluation of the Three-Dimensional Knee Kinematics, Applied to Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries, Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy, Jan. 19, 2006, vol. 14, pp. 592-604. |
Favre, et al., Ambulatory Measurement of 3D Knee Joint Angle, Journal of Biomechanics, Jan. 28, 2008, vol. 41, Issue 1029-1035. |
Fixed Reference Surgical Technique, SIGMA High Performance Instruments, DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc., 2008, Warsaw, IN, in 52pages. |
Ganapathi et al., “Limb Length and Femoral Offset Reconstruction During THA Using CT-Free Computer Navigation”, The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, 2009, vol. 91-B, Supplement III, p. 399. |
Goniometer, AllHeart.com, 2004, website: http://allheart.com/allheart, (1 page). |
Haaker et al., “Computer-Assisted Navigation Increases Precision of Component Placement in Total Knee Arthroplasty”, Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research, Apr. 2005, vol. 433, pp. 152-159. |
Hofstetter, Ph.D., et al., “Computer-Assisted Fluoroscopy-Based Reduction of Femoral Fractures and Antetorsion Correction”, Computer Aided Surgery, 2000, vol. 5, pp. 311-325, Wiley-Liss, Inc. |
Hsieh, Pang-Hsin, et al., “Image-guided periacetabular osteotomy: computer-assisted navigation compared with the conventional technique: A randomized study of 36 patients followed for 2 years”, Acta Orthopaedica, Aug. 1, 2006, 77:4, pp. 591-597. |
IASSIST Knee, Surgical Technique, Zimmer, Inc., 2012. |
International Preliminary Report for Application No. PCT/US2004/018244, dated Dec. 13, 2005, in 11 pages. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion issued in PCT Application No. PCT/US2013/039770, dated Sep. 25, 2013. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability issued in PCT Application No. PCT/US2013/039770, dated Nov. 11, 2014. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion issued in PCT Application No. PCT/US2013/041556, dated Sep. 13, 2013. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability issued in PCT Application No. PCT/US2013/041556, dated Nov. 18, 2014. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion issued in PCT Application No. PCT/US2013/053182, dated Nov. 11, 2013. |
International Search Report for Application No. PCT/US2004/018244, dated Feb. 15, 2005, in 4 pages. |
International Search Report for International Application No. PCT/US2009/051769 dated Nov. 19, 2009, in 11 pages. |
International Search Report for International Application No. PCT/US2009/051769 dated Nov. 19, 2009, in 3 pages. |
International Search Report for International Application No. PCT/US2011/022162, dated Jun. 16, 2011, in 4 pages. |
International Search Report for International Application No. PCT/US2009/056553, dated Nov. 4, 2009, in 12 pages. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability issued in PCT Application No. PCT/US2013/053182, dated Feb. 17, 2015, in 10 pages. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion issued in International Application No. PCT/US2016/018508, dated Jun. 22, 2016, in 19 pages. |
Jenny, et al., Computer-Assisted Implantation of Total Knee Prosthesis: A Case-Control Comparative Study with Classical Instrumentation, Computer Aided Surgery, 2001, vol. 6, pp. 217-220. |
Konyves et al., “The importance of leg length discrepancy after total hip arthroplasty”, The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery (Br), Feb. 2005, vol. 87-B, No. 2, pp. 155-157. |
Leenders, MD., et al., “Reduction in Variability of Acetabular Cup Abduction Using Computer Assisted Surgery: A Prospective and Randomized Study”, Computer Aided Surgery, 2002, vol. 7, pp. 99-106. |
Leung, et al., Intraobserver Errors in Obtaining Visually Selected Anatomic Landmarks During Registration Process in Nonimage-based Navigation-assisted Total Knee Arthroplasty, The Journal of Arthroplasty, 2005, vol. 20, Issue 5, pp. 591-601. |
Liebergall, Meir, et al., “Computerized Navigation for the Internal Fixation of Femoral Neck Fractures”, The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery Am, 2006, vol. 88, pp. 1748-1754. |
Longo, et al., MIKA Surgical Technique, DJO Surgical, 2008, Austin Texas in 14 pages. |
Luinge, Inertial Sensing of Human Movement, Twente University Press, Feb. 15, 1973, Pages in 88 pages. |
Mackenzie, et al., A Two-Ball Mouse Affords Three Degrees of Freedom, Extended Abstracts of the CHI '97 Conference on Human Factors in Compounding Systems (as printed from the internet on Jun. 13, 2012 URL: http://www.yorku.ca/mack/CHI97a.htm), 1997, pp. 303-304. |
Medical Research Ltd, Clinical Goniometer, http://www.mie-uk.com/Gonio, 1997, pp. 1 page. |
Minimally Invasive TKA Genesis II Anterior Cut First, Surgical Technique, Smith & Nephew, Nov. 2003, Memphis TN, in 16 pages. |
Noble et al., “Computer Simulation: How Can it Help the Surgeon Optimize Implant Position?”, Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research, Dec. 2003, vol. 417, pp. 242-252. |
Parratte, Sebastien, et al., “Validation and Usefulness of a Computer-Assisted Cup-Positioning System in Total Hip Arthroplasty. A Prospective, Randomized, Controlled Study”, The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery Am, 2007, vol. 89, pp. 494-499. |
Perseus Intelligent Cutting Guide, Orthokey, Product Guide, in 8 pages. |
Perseus Intelligent Cutting Guide, Smart Instruments for Knee Arthroplasty, Orthokey, in 2 pages. |
Ritter, M.D., et al., Postoperative Alignment of Total Knee Replacement, Its Effect on Survival, Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research, Feb. 1, 1994, Issue 299, pp. 153-156, Philadelphia. |
Rocon, et al., Application of Inertial Sensors and Rehabilitation Robotics, Rehabilitation Robotics 2007, Jun. 1, 2007, pp. 145-150. |
Sacks-Davis et. al., Atlas: A nested Relational Database System for Text Applications, IEEE Transations on Knowledge and Data Engineering, v.7, n. 3, Jun. 1995, pp. 454-470. |
Schep, et al., “Computer assisted orthopaedic and trauma surgery State of the art and future perspectives”, Injury Int. J. Care Injured 34, (website: www.elsevier.com/locate/injury), 2003 pp. 299-306. |
Scott, M.S., et al., P.F.C. Sigma Knee System, Primary Surgical Technique Part 1 of 2, DePuy International Ltd., 2003, England, (up to p. 44), in 48 pages. |
Scott, M.S., et al., P.F.C. Sigma Knee System, Primary Surgical Technique Part 2 of 2, DePuy International Ltd., 2003, England, Part A (up to p. 74), in 31 pages. (This reference was split in two due to size exceeding over 25MB). |
Scott, M.S., et al., P.F.C. Sigma Knee System, Primary Surgical Technique Part 2 of 2, DePuy International Ltd., 2003, England, Part B (up to p. 104), in 31 pages. (This reference was split in two due to size exceeding over 25MB). |
Sikorski et al., “Computer-Assisted Orthopaedic Surgery: Do We Need CAOS?”, The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery (Br), Apr. 2003, vol. 85-B, No. 3, pp. 319-323. |
Slomczykowski, et al., “Novel Computer-Assisted Fluoroscopy System for Intraoperative Guidance: Feasibility Study for Distal Locking of Femoral Nails”, Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma, 2001, vol. 15, No. 2, pp. 122-131, Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Inc., Philadelphia. |
Stulberg, et al., Computer-Assisted Total Knee Replacement Arthroplasty, Operative Techniques in Orthopaedics, Jan. 2000, vol. 10, Issue 1, pp. 25-39. |
The Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons, Academy News, http://www.aaos.org/wordhtml/2001news/b6-01.htm, Mar. 1, 2001, pp. 1 page. |
Tilt Sensors: High Accuracy, Digital Series, Crossbow Technology, Inc., pp. 32-35. |
Upadhyay et al., “Medical Malpractice in Hip and Knee Arthroplasty”, The Journal of Arthroplasty, 2007, vol. 22, No. 6, Suppl. 2, pp. 2-7. |
Visser, et al., 3D Analysis of Upper Body Movements in Bilateral Amputee Gait Using Inertial Sensors, Journal of Biomechanics, Jan. 1, 2007, vol. 40, Issue S509. |
Wentzensen et al., “Image-based hip navigation”, International Orthopaedics (SICOT), 2003, vol. 27 (Suppl. 1), pp. S43-S46. |
Wolfstadt et al., “An intelligent instrument for improved leg length and hip offset accuracy in total hip arthroplasty”, Abstract Only. |
Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/US2009/051769, dated Nov. 19, 2009, in 7 pages. |
Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/US2011/022162, dated Jun. 16, 2011, in 9 pages. |
Written Opinion of the ISR for Application No. PCT/US2004/018244, received Mar. 14, 2005, in 10 pages. |
Wylde et al., “Prevalence and functional impact of patient-perceived leg length discrepancy after hip replacement”, International Orthopaedics, 2009, vol. 33, pp. 905-909. |
Wylde et al., “Patient-perceived leg length discrepancy after total hip replacement: prevalence and impact on functional outcome”, International Orthopaedics, 2008, vol. 24, No. 2, pp. 210-216. |
Zheng et al., “Technical Principles of Computer Assisted Orthopaedic Surgery”, Suomen Ortopedia ja Traumatologia, Feb. 2008, vol. 31, pp. 135-147. |
Zhou, et al., Use of Multiple Wearable Inertial Sensors in Upper Limb Motion Tracking, Medical Engineering & Physics, Jan. 1, 2008, vol. 30, pp. 123-133. |
Zimmer NexGen Flexion Balancing Instruments, Surgical Technique, 2007, www.zimmer.com, in 44 pages. |
Zorman, David, et al., “Computer-assisted total knee arthroplasty: comparative results in a preliminary series of 72 cases”, ActaOrthop. Belg., 2005, 71, pp. 696-702. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20180303379 A1 | Oct 2018 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61226668 | Jul 2009 | US | |
61191603 | Sep 2008 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 14639784 | Mar 2015 | US |
Child | 15899790 | US | |
Parent | 13444142 | Apr 2012 | US |
Child | 14639784 | US | |
Parent | 12625445 | Nov 2009 | US |
Child | 13444142 | US | |
Parent | 12557051 | Sep 2009 | US |
Child | 12625445 | US |