Histotripsy excitation sequences optimized for bubble cloud formation using shock scattering

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 10293187
  • Patent Number
    10,293,187
  • Date Filed
    Thursday, July 3, 2014
    10 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, May 21, 2019
    5 years ago
Abstract
Methods and devices for producing cavitation in tissue are provided. In one embodiment, a shock scattering method of Histotripsy therapy comprises delivering an initiation pressure waveform from an ultrasound therapy transducer into tissue, the initiation pressure waveform being configured to produce at least one bubble in the tissue, delivering a scattering pressure waveform from the ultrasound therapy transducer into the at least one bubble within a life-cycle of the at least one bubble, and producing cavitation nuclei near the at least one bubble with the scattering pressure waveform. The scattering pressure waveform can be delivered during the life-cycle of the at least one bubble. In some embodiments, the scattering pressure waveform is delivered within 5 μs to 1 s of the initiation pressure waveform. Systems for performing shock scattering Histotripsy therapy are also discussed.
Description
INCORPORATION BY REFERENCE

All publications and patent applications mentioned in this specification are herein incorporated by reference to the same extent as if each individual publication or patent application was specifically and individually indicated to be incorporated by reference.


FIELD

This disclosure generally relates to treating tissue with cavitation created by ultrasound therapy.


BACKGROUND

Histotripsy, or pulsed ultrasound cavitation therapy, is a technology where short, intense bursts of acoustic energy induce controlled cavitation (microbubble or bubble cloud formation) within the focal volume. The vigorous expansion and collapse of these microbubbles mechanically homogenizes cells and tissue structures within the focal volume. This is a very different end result than the coagulative necrosis characteristic of thermal ablation. To operate within a non-thermal, Histotripsy realm; it is necessary to deliver acoustic energy in the form of high pressure amplitude acoustic pulses with low duty cycle.


Compared with conventional focused ultrasound technologies, Histotripsy has important advantages: 1) the destructive process at the focus is mechanical, not thermal; 2) bubble clouds appear bright on ultrasound imaging thereby confirming correct targeting and localization of treatment; 3) treated tissue appears darker (hypoechoic) on ultrasound imaging, so that the operator knows what has been treated; and 4) Histotripsy produces lesions in a controlled and precise manner. It is important to emphasize that unlike microwave, radiofrequency, or high-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU), Histotripsy is not a thermal modality.


Early canine studies of Histotripsy homogenization of prostate tissue employed a therapy transducer that was positioned to deliver Histotripsy transabdominally. In these studies, the prostate was located only a short distance from the skin surface and there was a relatively wide path from the transducer through the skin to focus ultrasound energy. Consequently, the spherical Histotripsy therapy transducer employed in these studies had 14 cm aperture and 10 cm focal length (F-number=0.71). Histotripsy therapy transducers with high F-numbers have very low efficiency compared to transducers with low F-numbers. These inefficiencies are primarily due to nonlinear acoustic propagation leading to shockwave formation.


Specialized therapy transducer and drive electronics have been designed to focus Histotripsy therapy through the perineum to the prostate. One example of a therapy transducer 100 configured to deliver Histotripsy therapy to the prostate is shown in FIG. 1. The transducer 100 can comprise a plurality of ultrasound transducer elements 102 disposed within housing 104. The transducer can be connected to a waveform generator configured to deliver Histotripsy waveforms from the transducer to tissue. The prostate depth from this approach is significantly deeper than in the canine model above. Additionally, the skeletal anatomy of the pelvis and transrectal position of the ultrasound imaging probe significantly reduced the effective transducer aperture. A cut-out 106 in the lower perimeter of housing can be configured to accommodate an ultrasound imaging probe (not shown) which has an F-number=0.85 in the main diameter and F-number=0.98 at the cut out.


Based on bench-top experimentation and modeling, an initial set of therapy transducer excitation parameters (3 cycles/pulse, 750 Vpp, 500 Hz PRF (Pulse Repetition Frequency)) was selected for canine testing with this transducer. This excitation sequence produced a non-linear focal pressure waveform with a peak negative and peak positive pressure of approximately 25 MPa and 100 MPa in water. We define this sequence and its variants as a, standard, or non-optimized, sequence because the sequence parameters were not optimized for bubble cloud formation.


This standard excitation sequence and variants were used to treat approximately 30 canine subjects to establish feasibility, dosing (cumulative number of pulses), and treatment implementation guidelines. An additional 10 canine subjects were then treated in a confirmatory study. Although, these studies yielded outstanding efficacy results, the observation of apparent minor injury (subclinical fibrosis) to the prefocal abdominal rectus muscle in 2 of 10 subjects in the confirmatory trial led to the conclusion that the safety profile needed to be improved by developing Histotripsy pulse sequences that deliver energy more efficiently. It is likely that the need to improve the efficiency of Histotripsy will become more important as transducers are developed to go deeper into tissues through skeletal anatomical obstructions.


SUMMARY OF THE DISCLOSURE

Improved efficiency leading to pre-focal heat reduction is imperative when soft tissue is targeted deep beneath the skin surface through skeletal anatomical obstructions which require ultrasound therapy transducers that have relatively high F numbers (F-number >0.8). Sequences optimized for enhanced Histotripsy homogenization of soft tissues were developed to reduce the potential of pre-focal thermal injury by optimizing the sequence efficiency. Improved efficiency of optimized excitation sequences increases the probability of initiating Histotripsy bubble clouds in tissue and reduces the occurrences of extinguishing bubble clouds when translating through tissues. Additionally, optimized sequences can be designed to selectively ablate fibrous tissues or ablate less dense tissues while preserving more fibro-elastic vital structures such as neuro-vascular structures.


Effective optimized sequences for high F-number transducers are characterized by an initiation pulse which is designed to create a least a single acoustically generated nucleus (bubble), followed by a shock scattering pulse (hereafter referred to as a scattering pulse or scattering pressure waveform) after an optimized time delay to enable a shockwave to impinge upon the first bubble to create a bubble cloud. Subsequent scattering pulses can follow also with optimized timing in order to further maintain the effectiveness of the bubble cloud. Note that pulse and pressure waveform will be used interchangeably in this application.


A method of treating tissue with ultrasound energy, comprising the steps of delivering an initiation pressure waveform from an ultrasound therapy transducer into tissue, the initiation pressure waveform being configured to produce at least one bubble in the tissue, delivering a scattering pressure waveform from the ultrasound therapy transducer into the at least one bubble within a life-cycle of the at least one bubble, and producing cavitation nuclei near the at least one bubble with the scattering pressure waveform.


In some embodiments, the scattering pressure waveform is delivered within 5 μs to 200 μs of the initiation pressure waveform.


In one embodiment, the method further comprises repeating the delivering an initiation pressure waveform and delivering a scattering pressure waveform steps until treatment of the tissue is completed.


In one embodiment, a pressure amplitude and/or number of cycles of the initiation pressure waveform is minimized to reduce tissue heating.


In another embodiment, a peak-to-peak pressure of the scattering pressure waveform is sufficient in amplitude create additional cavitation nuclei in the focal region.


In alternative embodiments, the pressure amplitude and/or number of cycles of the scattering pressure waveform is minimized to reduce tissue heating.


In some embodiments the method further comprises, after delivering the scattering pressure waveform, delivering a second scattering pressure waveform towards the at least one bubble and the cavitation nuclei.


In some embodiments, the second scattering pressure waveform is delivered within 5 μs to 1 s of the scattering pressure waveform.


In another embodiment, the method further comprises delivering additional scattering pressure waveforms without delivering additional initiation pressure waveforms until the at least one bubble and/or the cavitation nuclei no longer remain in the tissue.


In some embodiments, the additional scattering pressure waveforms are delivered every 5 μs to 1 s.


In one embodiment, a pulse sequence comprising the initiation pressure waveform and the scattering pressure waveform has a sequence PRF ranging from 1-5000 Hz.


In other embodiments, the scattering pressure waveform delivers less energy to intervening tissue than the initiation pressure waveform.


In one embodiment, the initiation pressure waveform and the scattering pressure waveform have substantially similar pressure amplitudes. In another embodiment, a pressure amplitude of the scattering pressure waveform is less than a pressure amplitude of the initiation pressure waveform. In alternative embodiments, a pressure amplitude of the scattering pressure waveform is more than a pressure amplitude of the initiation pressure waveform.


A method of treating tissue with ultrasound energy is provided, comprising the steps of transmitting an initiation pressure waveform from an ultrasound therapy transducer into tissue, the initiation pressure waveform being configured to produce at least one bubble in the tissue, during a life-cycle of the at least one bubble, transmitting a scattering pressure waveform from the ultrasound therapy transducer into the at least one bubble, the scattering pressure waveform configured to become a shocked focal pressure waveform in the tissue having a shocked positive pressure half cycle and a shocked negative pressure half cycle, the shocked positive pressure half cycle being configured to impinge on the at least one bubble and to scatter, invert, and constructively interfere with the shocked negative pressure half cycle to form a negative pressure half cycle waveform, and producing cavitation nuclei near the at least one bubble with a shock scattering mechanism between the positive pressure half cycle waveform and the at least one bubble.


A method of delivering ultrasound energy to tissue is provided, comprising the steps of delivering an initiation pulse from an ultrasound therapy transducer configured to provide at least 5 MPa of peak negative pressure to produce at least one bubble in the tissue, delivering a first scattering pulse into the at least one bubble within 5 μs to 200 μs of the initiation pulse, and producing a cavitation cloud of nuclei near the at least one bubble with a shock scattering mechanism between the first scattering pulse and the at least one bubble.


An ultrasound therapy system is provided, comprising an ultrasound therapy transducer, and an ultrasound therapy generator coupled to the ultrasound therapy transducer, the ultrasound therapy generator configured to drive the ultrasound therapy transducer to deliver an initiation pressure waveform into tissue to produce at least one bubble in tissue, the ultrasound therapy generator being further configured to drive the ultrasound therapy transducer to deliver a first scattering pressure waveform within 5 μs to 200 μs of the initiation pressure waveform into the at least one bubble to produce cavitation nuclei near the at least one bubble.


In some embodiments, a peak to peak pressure of the first scattering pulse is sufficient in pressure amplitude to produce cavitation nuclei near the at least one bubble.


In other embodiments, the ultrasound therapy generator is further configured to drive the ultrasound therapy transducer to deliver at least one additional scattering pulse after the first scattering pressure waveform to produce cavitation nuclei near the at least one bubble.


In one embodiment, the ultrasound therapy generator further comprises a controller configured to generate complex waveforms to initiate the initiation and scattering pressure waveforms, a high voltage power supply coupled to the controller, an amplifier configured to receive and amplify the complex waveforms from the controller and high voltage power supply, and a matching network configured to match an impedance of the ultrasound therapy transducer to the amplifier.


A method of treating tissue with ultrasound energy is provided, comprising the steps of producing at least one bubble in the tissue with ultrasound energy, colliding a shocked focal pressure waveform with the at least one bubble, and forming cavitation nuclei near the at least one bubble.


In one embodiment, the colliding step is performed during a life-cycle of the at least one bubble.


In another embodiment, the colliding step is performed within 5 μs to 200 μS of the producing step.


In an alternative embodiment, the forming cavitation nuclei step is achieved with a shock scattering mechanism between the shocked focal pressure waveform and the at least one bubble.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

The novel features of the invention are set forth with particularity in the claims that follow. A better understanding of the features and advantages of the present invention will be obtained by reference to the following detailed description that sets forth illustrative embodiments, in which the principles of the invention are utilized, and the accompanying drawings of which:



FIG. 1 is an ultrasound therapy transducer according to one embodiment.



FIGS. 2a-2c are illustrations of bubble cloud initiation in water.



FIG. 3. illustrates a focal pressure waveform according to one embodiment.



FIGS. 4a-4e are conceptual drawings that illustrate shock scattering.



FIGS. 5a-5c illustrate various embodiments of pulse sequences that include initiation and scattering pressure waveforms for delivering ultrasound energy to tissue.



FIG. 6 illustrates a system configured to deliver the preferred sequences for treating the tissue with cavitation.





DETAILED DESCRIPTION

Generation of Cavitation


Several principles of cavitation nuclei and bubble cloud formation that provide important background information for the development of the preferred embodiment are disclosed herein. Cavitation nuclei are individual bubbles formed as a result of the delivery of low pressure to tissue. Bubble clouds can comprise of dense clusters of cavitation nuclei that form at or near the transducer focus. The formation of cavitation nuclei (bubble clouds) are both key components of Histotripsy therapy.


Probability for Forming Cavitation Nuclei


Cavitation nuclei can be formed in tissue if the tissue is subjected to a peak negative (peak rarefaction) pressure approaching or exceeding the pressure level needed to create at least a single cavitation nucleus (bubble). Note that this level is variable and is dependent upon multiple factors including tissue properties (structure and composition, dissolved gas content, and existence of impurities), transducer geometry (focal distance and f number), and sequencing scheme (PRF; number of cycles). The number of cavitation nuclei formed from one acoustic pulse has been shown to be directly related to the peak negative pressure achieved.


Cavitation Time Course


Cavitation nuclei grow to a maximum size and then collapse. The cavitation time course for the process of bubble initiation, growth, and then collapse is dependent on the medium (i.e., tissue type). The cavitation time course for liquids is longer than in gelatin and soft tissue. Table 1 compares cavitation initiation, growth, and collapse times in water vs. gelatin. FIGS. 2a-2c are illustrations showing a typical cavitation time course. FIG. 2a illustrates initiation of cavitation 208 in a medium, such as in tissue, in water, or in gelatin. FIG. 2b shows growth of the cavitation 208 to a maximum size, in which the cavitation bubbles are grouped together in the focal zone. FIG. 2c illustrates collapse of the cavitation 208 where nearly all the cavitation bubbles have collapsed and disappeared.
















Delay-time












Event
In Water (μs)
In Gelatin (μs)















Initiation
68
68



Growth
149
84



Collapse
230
100










Acoustic Shock and the Shock Scattering Mechanism for Bubble Cloud Formation


As a sound waveform travels through the medium the positive (compression) half cycle(s) travel faster than the negative (rarefaction) half cycle(s). This effect causes the pressure waveform to become nonlinear creating a sharp transition between negative and positive half cycles of the pressure waveform. The pressure amplitude of the positive half cycle increases as the slope of this transition increases and the pressure waveform is said to be become more nonlinear or “shocked”. This can be referred to as a shocked focal pressure waveform. The level of nonlinearity is dependent upon the pressure amplitude of the pressure waveform as well as the distance propagated through the medium. FIG. 3 shows an example of a shocked focal pressure waveform with a positive half cycle and a negative half cycle. It should be understood that shocked focal pressure waveforms can include a plurality of positive and negative half cycles.


According to the present disclosure, cavitation nuclei can be formed in tissue as a result of shock scattering. Shock scattering occurs when a shocked positive pressure half cycle of an acoustic waveform is reflected, or scattered, off of a pre-existing bubble(s) and the shocked positive pressure half cycle is consequently inverted such that it combines with the incident negative pressure half cycle of the acoustic waveform in an additive fashion. If this combined new negative pressure half cycle produced is large enough (i.e. above the intrinsic threshold for the tissue or medium of interest—greater than 5 MPa peak negative pressure for example), additional cavitation nuclei will form near any preexisting nuclei. This process repeats itself until the combined new negative pressure half cycle is not sufficient in pressure to create new cavitation nuclei.



FIGS. 4a-4e are conceptual drawings illustrating a shock scattering method of Histotripsy therapy. The frames on the top show a pre-existing bubble 408 and a shocked positive pressure half cycle 410, and the frames on the bottom show the ultrasound pulse pressure distribution 412 (horizontal line 414 indicates a pressure amplitude of zero). The pre-existing bubble 408 may be formed with an initiation pulse or sequence as described above. A shocked pressure waveform can then be transmitted towards the bubble 408 during a life-cycle of the bubble according to one embodiment of the shock scattering method.


In FIGS. 4a-4e, the incident shocked pressure waveform 412 propagates from left to right towards the pre-existing bubble 408, as indicated by arrows 416. The incident shocked pressure waveform can be delivered towards and into the bubble during a life-cycle of the bubble, so that the incident shocked pressure waveform interacts with the bubble. A single pre-existing bubble 408 is shown in FIG. 4a, having already been generated in the tissue as described above. That bubble can expand in size, as shown in FIG. 4b, due to the initial negative pressure half cycle of the incident shocked pressure waveform. In FIG. 4c, a shocked positive pressure half cycle 410 of the incident shocked pressure waveform 412 impinges on the bubble 408 and the positive pressure half cycle begins to scatter. The scattered shocked positive pressure half cycle inverts and constructively interferes with the shocked negative pressure half cycle 413 of the incident shocked pressure waveform 412 to create a transient, large amplitude, negative pressure half cycle 418 (illustrated as the circular dotted line 418 in FIGS. 4c-4e) that produces additional cavitation nuclei 420 near or behind the bubble 408. The negative pressure half cycle 418 propagates from right to left, as indicated by arrows 422. The additional cavitation nuclei 420 form in the opposite direction of the shocked positive pressure waveform 410, until the negative pressure half cycle 418 drops below the threshold for the formation of cavitation nuclei, as shown in FIG. 4e. This process may be repeated with successive shocked pressure waveforms transmitted towards and into the pre-existing bubble 408 and additional cavitation nuclei 420.


Cavitation nuclei formed by this shock scattering method tend to grow towards the therapy transducer and their extent depends on the number of high pressure cycles in the pulse (waveform) and the pulse repetition frequency (PRF). Minimizing the number of cycles in a shocked waveform or reducing the sequence PRF are effective ways of reducing the length of the bubble cloud and also reducing the time average intensity and therefore the thermal dose.


Enhanced Bubble Cloud Formation Using Shock Scattering


The key components of a preferred Histotripsy excitation sequence described in this disclosure are: 1) A first pulse of the sequence, referred to as an initiation pulse or initiation pressure waveform, configured to form at least one bubble in the tissue 2) A second pulse of the sequence, referred to as a scattering pulse or scattering pressure waveform, configured to generate cavitation nuclei near the at least one bubble through shock scattering, and 3) A specific time delay between the initiation and scattering pulses.


The key parameters for the pulses are: The initiation pulse should be configured to produce at least one bubble in the tissue of interest. This can be achieved with a traditional Histotripsy initiation pulse, as described above, or with other ultrasound techniques that can induce bubble formation in tissue due to boiling such as HIFU or boiling Histotripsy. The scattering pulse should have a peak-to-peak pressure high enough for shock scattering formation of cavitation nuclei. In some embodiments, the time delay between these pulses can range between 5 μs and 200 μs. In another embodiment, the time delay between these pulses can range between 5 μs and 40 ms. In another embodiment, the time delay between these pulses can range between 5 μs and 1 s.


In another embodiment, the pressure amplitude and/or number of cycles used in the initiation pulse can be increased or decreased. Increasing the pressure amplitude and/or number of cycles in the initiation pulse may increase the probability of creating cavitation in the tissue. However this would also likely increase the time averaged intensity, and thermal dose, delivered to the tissue and the extent of the bubble cloud. Decreasing the pressure amplitude and/or number of cycles of the initiation pulse will reduce the intensity, and thermal dose, of the sequence but may limit the ability of the sequence to generate and/or maintain cavitation.


In another embodiment, the pressure amplitude and/or number of cycles used in the scattering pulse(s) can be increased or decreased. Increasing the pressure amplitude and/or number of cycles in the scattering pulse(s) may increase the probability of creating cavitation in the tissue. However this would also likely increase the time averaged intensity delivered to the tissue, and thermal dose, delivered to the tissue and the extent of the bubble cloud. Decreasing the pressure amplitude and/or number of cycles of the scattering pulse(s) will reduce the intensity, and thermal dose, of the sequence but may limit the ability of the sequence to generate and/or maintain cavitation.


The sequence PRF can be as high as 5000 Hz assuming that the time averaged intensity, and resultant thermal dose, are kept within safe limits. The preferred range depends on the tissues being treated. A higher PRF is recommended for more dense and fibrous tissues, and a low PRF is recommended for less dense tissues and for preservation of more fibrous and often vital tissues. Selective treatment of tissues with Histotripsy based on their stiffness can be a probable design and performance consideration for sequence development.


In some embodiments additional scattering pulses with lower pressure amplitude and/or number of cycles (compared with the initiation pulse pressure amplitude and/or number of cycles), can be applied in order to reduce the intensity, and thermal dose, of the sequence without reducing the sequence PRF.



FIGS. 5a-5c illustrate three different embodiments for Histotripsy initiation and scattering pulse sequences that can be used to generate and maintain cavitation in tissue during a shocked scattering method of Histotripsy therapy. In FIG. 5a, an initiation pulse 524a comprising a pressure waveform configured to form at least one bubble in the tissue can be transmitted into tissue. After a specific time delay has passed, a scattering pulse 526a can be transmitted into tissue towards and into the at least one bubble formed by the initiation pulse 524a. In some embodiments, the specific time delay between these pulses can range between 5 μs and 200 μs. In another embodiment, the time delay between these pulses can range between 5 μs s and 40 ms. In another embodiment, the time delay between these pulses can range between 5 μs and 1 s. The scattering pulse 526a becomes a shocked focal pressure waveform as it travels through the tissue, and the at least one shocked positive pressure half cycle of the scattering pulse impinges on the at least one bubble and is scattered by the at least one bubble. The shocked positive pressure half cycle of the scattering pulse inverts and constructively interferes with the shocked negative pressure half cycle of the scattering pulse to create a transient, large amplitude, negative pressure half cycle that produces additional cavitation nuclei behind the at least one bubble generated by the initiation pulse. These pulse sequence pairs of initiation and scattering pulses can be repeated to achieve the desired ablation effect in tissue from the resulting cavitation, as shown in FIG. 5a (pulse pairs 524b/526b, 524c/526c, 524d/526d, . . . , 524n/526n). In this embodiment, the pressure amplitudes and/or number of cycles of both the initiation and scattering pulses can be the same or approximately the same.



FIG. 5b shows another embodiment, similar to the embodiment of FIG. 5a, except the pressure amplitude of the scattering pulses 524a-524n are smaller than the pressure amplitude of the corresponding initiation pulses. Due to the principle of shock, the peak positive wave is amplified relative to the peak negative wave and therefore, the pressure amplitude used to create the scattering pulses can be lowered while still delivering the needed negative pressure with the reflected and inverted positive wave. This embodiment is more efficient than the embodiment of FIG. 5a and delivers a lower dose of energy into the tissue. In another embodiment, however, the pressure amplitude of the scattering pulses can be greater than the pressure amplitude of the corresponding initiation pulses.



FIG. 5c illustrates another embodiment, which is a variation of the embodiment of FIGS. 5a and 5b. In this embodiment, initiation pulse 524a is followed by a scattering pulse 526a after a specific time delay, but instead of following that with another initiation/scattering pulse pair as in FIG. 5a, instead the scattering pulse 526a is followed with another scattering pulse 526b after a second time delay. A plurality of scattering pulses can be delivered into tissue after the appropriate time delay to maintain the effectiveness of the bubble cloud (e.g., pulses 526c, 526d) to achieve the desired ablation effect in tissue from the resulting cavitation. The pressure amplitudes of the scattering pulse can be less than, equal to, or greater than the pressure amplitude of the initiation pulse. In some embodiments, the time delay for subsequent scattering pressure waveforms can be different than the time delay used for the first scattering pressure. For example, the first scattering pressure waveform may be delivered within 5 μs to 200 μs of the initiation pressure waveform, but subsequent scattering pressure waveforms may be delivered within 5 μs to 200 μs, 5 μs to 40 ms, or 5 μs to 1 s. If the cavitation needs to be re-initiated in the tissue, the sequence can be re-started with another initiation/scattering pulse pair, as shown by 524n/526n in FIG. 5c. This embodiment also uses a lower pressure amplitude scattering pulse, as in the embodiment of FIG. 5b, but also uses fewer initiation pulses. The result of this embodiment is the lowest dose of energy delivered to tissue between the embodiments of FIGS. 5a-5c. This strategy has the potential to lower the dose significantly (as much as 50% for example) compared with traditional histotripsy sequences.


Amplitude Reduction or Elimination of the Initiation Pulse Once the Bubble Cloud is Established:


The purpose of the initiation/scattering pair is to generate cavitation in tissue with shock scattering. Once the bubble cloud is generated, and if the focus is not moved, the initiation pulse may no longer be needed to maintain the effectiveness of the bubble cloud. In this case, the system could be designed to first create a bubble cloud with an initiation/scattering pair and follow that with lower pressure amplitude (relative to the initiation pulse pressure amplitude) scattering pulses until the focus is moved. At which point the process is repeated.


System Software and Hardware Design that Allowed for Sequence Development


A Histotripsy system and generator is configured to generate very complex waveforms in order to support the ultrasound pulse sequences described herein. A simplified block diagram of system 600 is shown in FIG. 6. The main components of the system are: Computer/controller 602, USB to Serial Converter 604, Microcontroller 606, FPGA (Field Programmable Gate Array) 608, High Voltage Controller and Power Supply 610, Amplifier 612, and Therapy Transducer 614.


All controls for the generator can be established using “Histotripsy Service Tool” software that can run on the computer/controller 602 (e.g., a standard PC) and communicates to the generator via USB serial communication 604.


The system 600 is configured to receive multiple sets of different driving parameters and loop them, which give the ability to the user to create wide range of custom sequences where all parameters (PRF, voltage amplitude, number of cycles, number of pulses per set, frequency, transducer element channels enabled, and time delays) can be set differently for every pulse generated. Time delays between pulses can be specified by the PRF for a parameter set or by specifying zero as the number of cycles per pulse.


For overall voltage amplitude regulation, level of high voltage is changed accordingly through the Microcontroller 606 and HV Controller 610. This method cannot be used for dynamic voltage amplitude changes between two pulses since it will take too long for all capacitors on the HV line to discharge. For dynamic voltage amplitude changes between pulses, PWM (pulse width modulation) is used at the FPGA 608 where the duty cycle of the pulse is modulated in order to produce the desired pulse voltage and resultant pressure amplitude.


Histotripsy Service Tool


Histotripsy Service Tool is an application that can be run on any PC and is used for controlling the system. The Histotripsy Service Tool can start/stop the therapy, set and read the level of high voltage, therapy parameters (PRF, number of cycles, duty ratio, channel enabled and delay, etc), and set and read other service and maintenance related items.


USB to Serial Converter


USB to Serial converter 604 converts USB combination to serial in order to communicate to the Microcontroller 606.


Microcontroller


The Microcontroller 606 communicates to the computer/controller 602 (Histotripsy Service Tool) to set/read working parameters, start/stop the therapy, etc. It can use internal flash memory to store all the parameters. The Microcontroller communicates to the FPGA 608 all driving parameters that are necessary to generate complex pulsing. It also communicates using serial communication to the high voltage controller and power supply 610 where it can set/read the proper level of driving voltage.


FPGA


The FPGA 608 receives the information from the Microcontroller 606 and it generates the complex pulsing sequence that is required to drive the amplifier 612. The FPGA can run on 100 MHz clock since speed of pulsing is critical to be timed in 10 ns increments.


High Voltage Controller and Power Supply


The High Voltage Controller and Power Supply 610 receives the commands from the Microcontroller 606 regarding the level of DC voltage that needs to be supplied to the amplifier circuitry in order to have an adequate voltage amplitude level at the output of the amplifier.


Amplifier


The Amplifier 612 receives pulses generated by the FPGA and is supplied with high voltage from High Voltage Controller and Power Supply. It generates high voltage amplitude pulses that are fed to the Therapy Transducer 614 through the matching network components which properly matches the impedance of the therapy transducer to the impedance of the amplifier. It is necessary to use a large number of capacitors that can store enough energy to support peak current demand during the generation of high voltage amplitude pulses.


The data structures and code described in this detailed description are typically stored on a computer-readable storage medium, which may be any device or medium that can store code and/or data for use by a computer system. The computer-readable storage medium includes, but is not limited to, volatile memory, non-volatile memory, magnetic and optical storage devices such as disk drives, magnetic tape, CDs (compact discs), DVDs (digital versatile discs or digital video discs), or other media capable of storing computer-readable media now known or later developed.


The methods and processes described in the detailed description section can be embodied as code and/or data, which can be stored in a computer-readable storage medium as described above. When a computer system reads and executes the code and/or data stored on the computer-readable storage medium, the computer system performs the methods and processes embodied as data structures and code and stored within the computer-readable storage medium.


Furthermore, the methods and processes described above can be included in hardware modules. For example, the hardware modules can include, but are not limited to, application-specific integrated circuit (ASIC) chips, field-programmable gate arrays (FPGAs), and other programmable-logic devices now known or later developed. When the hardware modules are activated, the hardware modules perform the methods and processes included within the hardware modules.


The examples and illustrations included herein show, by way of illustration and not of limitation, specific embodiments in which the subject matter may be practiced. As mentioned, other embodiments may be utilized and derived there from, such that structural and logical substitutions and changes may be made without departing from the scope of this disclosure. Such embodiments of the inventive subject matter may be referred to herein individually or collectively by the term “invention” merely for convenience and without intending to voluntarily limit the scope of this application to any single invention or inventive concept, if more than one is, in fact, disclosed. Thus, although specific embodiments have been illustrated and described herein, any arrangement calculated to achieve the same purpose may be substituted for the specific embodiments shown. This disclosure is intended to cover any and all adaptations or variations of various embodiments. Combinations of the above embodiments, and other embodiments not specifically described herein, will be apparent to those of skill in the art upon reviewing the above description.

Claims
  • 1. A method of treating tissue with ultrasound energy, comprising the steps of: delivering a first pulse of a Histotripsy excitation sequence from an ultrasound therapy transducer, the first pulse comprising an initiation pressure waveform configured to produce at least one bubble in the tissue;delivering a second pulse of the Histotripsy excitation sequence from the ultrasound therapy transducer, the second pulse comprising a scattering pressure waveform configured to interact with the at least one bubble within a life-cycle of the at least one bubble; andproducing cavitation nuclei near the at least one bubble with the scattering pressure waveform.
  • 2. The method of claim 1, wherein the scattering pressure waveform is delivered within 5 μs to 200 μs of the initiation pressure waveform.
  • 3. The method of claim 1, further comprising repeating the delivering the initiation pressure waveform and delivering the scattering pressure waveform steps until treatment of the tissue is completed.
  • 4. The method of claim 1, wherein a peak-to-peak pressure of the scattering pressure waveform is sufficient in amplitude create additional cavitation nuclei in the focal region.
  • 5. The method of claim 1, further comprising, after delivering the scattering pressure waveform, delivering a second scattering pressure waveform towards the at least one bubble and the cavitation nuclei.
  • 6. The method of claim 5, wherein the second scattering pressure waveform is delivered within 5 μs to 1 s of the scattering pressure waveform.
  • 7. The method of claim 5, further comprising delivering additional scattering pressure waveforms without delivering additional initiation pressure waveforms until the at least one bubble and/or the cavitation nuclei no longer remain in the tissue.
  • 8. The method of claim 7, wherein the additional scattering pressure waveforms are delivered every 5 μs to 1 s.
  • 9. The method of claim 1, wherein the Histotripsy excitation sequence comprising the initiation pressure waveform and the scattering pressure waveform has a sequence pulse repetition frequency ranging from 1-5000 Hz.
  • 10. The method of claim 1, wherein the scattering pressure waveform delivers less energy to intervening tissue than the initiation pressure waveform.
  • 11. The method of claim 1, wherein the initiation pressure waveform and the scattering pressure waveform have similar pressure amplitudes.
  • 12. The method of claim 1, wherein a pressure amplitude of the scattering pressure waveform is less than a pressure amplitude of the initiation pressure waveform.
  • 13. The method of claim 1, wherein a pressure amplitude of the scattering pressure waveform is more than a pressure amplitude of the initiation pressure waveform.
  • 14. A method of treating tissue with ultrasound energy, comprising the steps of: transmitting a first pulse of a Histotripsy excitation sequence from an ultrasound therapy transducer, the first pulse comprising an initiation pressure waveform configured to produce at least one bubble in the tissue;during a life-cycle of the at least one bubble, transmitting a second pulse of the Histotripsy excitation sequence from the ultrasound therapy transducer, the second pulse comprising a scattering pressure waveform configured to interact with the at least one bubble, the scattering pressure waveform configured to become a shocked focal pressure waveform in the tissue having a shocked positive pressure half cycle and a shocked negative pressure half cycle, the shocked positive pressure half cycle being configured to impinge on the at least one bubble and to scatter, invert, and constructively interfere with the shocked negative pressure half cycle to form a negative pressure half cycle waveform; andproducing cavitation nuclei near the at least one bubble with a shock scattering mechanism between the positive pressure half cycle waveform and the at least one bubble.
  • 15. A method of delivering ultrasound energy to tissue, comprising the steps of: delivering a first pulse of a Histotripsy excitation sequence from an ultrasound therapy transducer, the first pulse comprising an initiation pulse configured to provide at least 5 MPa of peak negative pressure to produce at least one bubble in the tissue;delivering a second pulse of the Histotripsy excitation sequence from the ultrasound therapy transducer, the second pulse comprising a first scattering pulse configured to interact with the at least one bubble within 5 μs to 200 μs of the initiation pulse; andproducing a cavitation cloud of nuclei near the at least one bubble with a shock scattering mechanism between the first scattering pulse and the at least one bubble.
  • 16. An ultrasound therapy system, comprising: an ultrasound therapy transducer; andan ultrasound therapy generator coupled to the ultrasound therapy transducer, the ultrasound therapy generator configured to drive the ultrasound therapy transducer to deliver a first pulse of a Histotripsy excitation sequence comprising an initiation pressure waveform into tissue to produce at least one bubble in tissue, the ultrasound therapy generator being further configured to drive the ultrasound therapy transducer to deliver a second pulse of the Histotripsy excitation sequence comprising a first scattering pressure waveform within 5 μs to 200 μs of the initiation pressure waveform into the at least one bubble to produce cavitation nuclei near the at least one bubble.
  • 17. The system of claim 16, wherein a peak to peak pressure of the first scattering pulse is sufficient in pressure amplitude to produce cavitation nuclei near the at least one bubble.
  • 18. The system of claim 16, wherein the ultrasound therapy generator is further configured to drive the ultrasound therapy transducer to deliver at least one additional scattering pulse after the first scattering pressure waveform to produce cavitation nuclei near the at least one bubble.
  • 19. The system of claim 16, wherein the ultrasound therapy generator further comprises: a controller configured to generate complex waveforms to initiate the initiation and scattering pressure waveforms;a high voltage power supply coupled to the controller;an amplifier configured to receive and amplify the complex waveforms from the controller and high voltage power supply; anda matching network configured to match an impedance of the ultrasound therapy transducer to the amplifier.
CROSS REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS

This application claims the benefit under 35 U.S.C. 119 of U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 61/842,820, filed Jul. 3, 2013, titled “Modulated Excitation Sequences for Enhanced Pulsed Ultrasound Cavitational Therapy”, which application is incorporated herein by reference.

US Referenced Citations (302)
Number Name Date Kind
3243497 Kendall et al. Mar 1966 A
3679021 Goldberg et al. Jul 1972 A
4016749 Wachter Apr 1977 A
4024501 Herring et al. May 1977 A
4051394 Tieden Sep 1977 A
4117446 Alais Sep 1978 A
4269174 Adair May 1981 A
4277367 Madsen et al. Jul 1981 A
4351038 Alais Sep 1982 A
4406153 Ophir et al. Sep 1983 A
4440025 Hayakawa et al. Apr 1984 A
4453408 Clayman Jun 1984 A
4483345 Miwa Nov 1984 A
4549533 Cain et al. Oct 1985 A
4550606 Drost Nov 1985 A
4575330 Hull Mar 1986 A
4622972 Giebeler, Jr. Nov 1986 A
4625731 Quedens et al. Dec 1986 A
4641378 McConnell et al. Feb 1987 A
4669483 Hepp et al. Jun 1987 A
4689986 Carson et al. Sep 1987 A
4757820 Itoh Jul 1988 A
4791915 Barsotti et al. Dec 1988 A
4819621 Ueberle et al. Apr 1989 A
4829491 Saugeon et al. May 1989 A
4856107 Dory Aug 1989 A
4865042 Umemura et al. Sep 1989 A
4888746 Wurster et al. Dec 1989 A
4890267 Rudolph Dec 1989 A
4922917 Dory May 1990 A
4938217 Lele Jul 1990 A
4957099 Hassler Sep 1990 A
4973980 Howkins et al. Nov 1990 A
4984575 Uchiyama et al. Jan 1991 A
4991151 Dory Feb 1991 A
4995012 Dory Feb 1991 A
RE33590 Dory May 1991 E
5014686 Schafer May 1991 A
5065751 Wolf Nov 1991 A
5080101 Dory Jan 1992 A
5080102 Dory Jan 1992 A
5091893 Smith et al. Feb 1992 A
5092336 Fink Mar 1992 A
5097709 Masuzawa et al. Mar 1992 A
5111822 Dory May 1992 A
5143073 Dory Sep 1992 A
5143074 Dory Sep 1992 A
5150711 Dory Sep 1992 A
5158070 Dory Oct 1992 A
5158071 Umemura et al. Oct 1992 A
5163421 Bernstein et al. Nov 1992 A
5165412 Okazaki Nov 1992 A
5174294 Saito et al. Dec 1992 A
5209221 Riedlinger May 1993 A
5215680 D'Arrigo Jun 1993 A
5219401 Cathignol et al. Jun 1993 A
5230340 Rhyne Jul 1993 A
5295484 Marcus et al. Mar 1994 A
5316000 Chapelon et al. May 1994 A
5354258 Dory Oct 1994 A
5380411 Schlief Jan 1995 A
5409002 Pell Apr 1995 A
5431621 Dory Jul 1995 A
5435311 Umemura et al. Jul 1995 A
5443069 Schaetzle Aug 1995 A
5469852 Nakamura et al. Nov 1995 A
5474071 Chapelon et al. Dec 1995 A
5474531 Carter Dec 1995 A
5501655 Rolt et al. Mar 1996 A
5520188 Hennige et al. May 1996 A
5523058 Umemura et al. Jun 1996 A
5524620 Rosenschein Jun 1996 A
5540909 Schutt Jul 1996 A
5542935 Unger et al. Aug 1996 A
5558092 Unger et al. Sep 1996 A
5563346 Bartelt et al. Oct 1996 A
5566675 Li et al. Oct 1996 A
5573497 Chapelon Nov 1996 A
5580575 Unger et al. Dec 1996 A
5582578 Zhong et al. Dec 1996 A
5590657 Cain et al. Jan 1997 A
5601526 Chapelon et al. Feb 1997 A
5617862 Cole et al. Apr 1997 A
5648098 Porter Jul 1997 A
5666954 Chapelon et al. Sep 1997 A
5676452 Scholz Oct 1997 A
5676692 Sanghvi et al. Oct 1997 A
5678554 Hossack et al. Oct 1997 A
5694936 Fujimoto et al. Dec 1997 A
5695460 Siegel et al. Dec 1997 A
5717657 Ruffa Feb 1998 A
5724972 Petrofsky Mar 1998 A
5743863 Chapelon Apr 1998 A
5753929 Bliss May 1998 A
5759162 Oppelt et al. Jun 1998 A
5766138 Rattner Jun 1998 A
5769790 Watkins et al. Jun 1998 A
5797848 Marian et al. Aug 1998 A
5823962 Schaetzle et al. Oct 1998 A
5827204 Grandia et al. Oct 1998 A
5836896 Rosenschein Nov 1998 A
5849727 Porter et al. Dec 1998 A
5873902 Sanghvi et al. Feb 1999 A
5879314 Peterson et al. Mar 1999 A
5932807 Mallart Aug 1999 A
5947904 Hossack et al. Sep 1999 A
6001069 Tachibana et al. Dec 1999 A
6022309 Celliers et al. Feb 2000 A
6036667 Manna et al. Mar 2000 A
6088613 Unger Jul 2000 A
6093883 Sanghvi et al. Jul 2000 A
6113558 Rosenschein et al. Sep 2000 A
6126607 Whitmore, III et al. Oct 2000 A
6128958 Cain Oct 2000 A
6143018 Beuthan et al. Nov 2000 A
6165144 Talish et al. Dec 2000 A
6176842 Tachibana et al. Jan 2001 B1
6308585 Nilsson et al. Oct 2001 B1
6308710 Silva Oct 2001 B1
6309355 Cain et al. Oct 2001 B1
6318146 Madsen et al. Nov 2001 B1
6321109 Ben-Haim et al. Nov 2001 B2
6338566 Verdier Jan 2002 B1
6344489 Spears Feb 2002 B1
6391020 Kurtz et al. May 2002 B1
6413216 Cain et al. Jul 2002 B1
6419648 Vitek et al. Jul 2002 B1
6470204 Uzgiris et al. Oct 2002 B1
6488639 Ribault et al. Dec 2002 B1
6490469 Candy Dec 2002 B2
6500141 Irion et al. Dec 2002 B1
6506154 Ezion et al. Jan 2003 B1
6506171 Vitek et al. Jan 2003 B1
6508774 Acker et al. Jan 2003 B1
6511428 Azuma et al. Jan 2003 B1
6511444 Hynynen et al. Jan 2003 B2
6522142 Freundlich Feb 2003 B1
6524251 Rabiner et al. Feb 2003 B2
6536553 Scanlon Mar 2003 B1
6543272 Vitek Apr 2003 B1
6556750 Constantino et al. Apr 2003 B2
6559644 Froundlich et al. May 2003 B2
6576220 Unger Jun 2003 B2
6599288 Maguire et al. Jul 2003 B2
6607498 Eshel Aug 2003 B2
6612988 Maor et al. Sep 2003 B2
6613004 Vitek et al. Sep 2003 B1
6613005 Friedman et al. Sep 2003 B1
6626854 Friedman et al. Sep 2003 B2
6626855 Weng et al. Sep 2003 B1
6645162 Friedman et al. Nov 2003 B2
6648839 Manna et al. Nov 2003 B2
6666833 Friedman et al. Dec 2003 B1
6685640 Fry et al. Feb 2004 B1
6685657 Jones Feb 2004 B2
6705994 Vortman et al. Mar 2004 B2
6719449 Laugharn, Jr. et al. Apr 2004 B1
6719694 Weng et al. Apr 2004 B2
6735461 Vitek et al. May 2004 B2
6736814 Manna et al. May 2004 B2
6750463 Riley Jun 2004 B1
6770031 Hynynen et al. Aug 2004 B2
6775438 Gaedke et al. Aug 2004 B1
6788977 Fenn et al. Sep 2004 B2
6790180 Vitek Sep 2004 B2
6820160 Allman Nov 2004 B1
6852082 Strickberger et al. Feb 2005 B2
6869439 White et al. Mar 2005 B2
6890332 Truckai et al. May 2005 B2
6929609 Asafusa Aug 2005 B2
7004282 Manna et al. Feb 2006 B2
7059168 Hibi et al. Jun 2006 B2
7128711 Medan et al. Oct 2006 B2
7128719 Rosenberg Oct 2006 B2
7175596 Vitek et al. Feb 2007 B2
7196313 Quinones Mar 2007 B2
7223239 Schulze et al. May 2007 B2
7258674 Cribbs et al. Aug 2007 B2
7273458 Prausnitz et al. Sep 2007 B2
7273459 Desilets et al. Sep 2007 B2
7300414 Holland et al. Nov 2007 B1
7311679 Desilets et al. Dec 2007 B2
7331951 Eshel et al. Feb 2008 B2
7341569 Soltani et al. Mar 2008 B2
7347855 Eshel et al. Mar 2008 B2
7358226 Dayton et al. Apr 2008 B2
7359640 Onde et al. Apr 2008 B2
7367948 O'Donnell et al. May 2008 B2
7374551 Liang et al. May 2008 B2
7377900 Vitek et al. May 2008 B2
7442168 Novak et al. Oct 2008 B2
7462488 Madsen et al. Dec 2008 B2
7559905 Kagosaki et al. Jul 2009 B2
7656638 Laakso et al. Feb 2010 B2
8057408 Cain et al. Nov 2011 B2
8333115 Garvey et al. Dec 2012 B1
8539813 Cain et al. Sep 2013 B2
20010039420 Burbank et al. Nov 2001 A1
20010041163 Sugita et al. Nov 2001 A1
20020045890 Celliers et al. Apr 2002 A1
20020078964 Kovac et al. Jun 2002 A1
20020099356 Unger et al. Jul 2002 A1
20030092982 Eppstein May 2003 A1
20030112922 Burdette et al. Jun 2003 A1
20030149352 Liang et al. Aug 2003 A1
20030157025 Unger et al. Aug 2003 A1
20030181833 Faragalla et al. Sep 2003 A1
20030199857 Eizenhofer Oct 2003 A1
20030221561 Milo Dec 2003 A1
20030236539 Rabiner et al. Dec 2003 A1
20040127815 Marchitto et al. Jul 2004 A1
20040138563 Moehring et al. Jul 2004 A1
20040236248 Svedman Nov 2004 A1
20040243021 Murphy et al. Dec 2004 A1
20050038339 Chauhan et al. Feb 2005 A1
20050038361 Zhong et al. Feb 2005 A1
20050152561 Spencer Jul 2005 A1
20050154314 Quistgaard Jul 2005 A1
20050283098 Conston et al. Dec 2005 A1
20060060991 Holsteyns et al. Mar 2006 A1
20060074303 Chornenky et al. Apr 2006 A1
20060173387 Hansmann et al. Aug 2006 A1
20060206028 Lee et al. Sep 2006 A1
20060241466 Ottoboni et al. Oct 2006 A1
20060241523 Sinelnikov et al. Oct 2006 A1
20060264760 Liu et al. Nov 2006 A1
20060293630 Manna et al. Dec 2006 A1
20070010805 Fedewa et al. Jan 2007 A1
20070016039 Vortman et al. Jan 2007 A1
20070044562 Sarr Mar 2007 A1
20070065420 Johnson Mar 2007 A1
20070083120 Cain et al. Apr 2007 A1
20070161902 Dan Jul 2007 A1
20070167764 Hynynen Jul 2007 A1
20070205785 Nilsson Sep 2007 A1
20070219448 Seip et al. Sep 2007 A1
20080013593 Kawabata Jan 2008 A1
20080055003 Unnikrishnan et al. Mar 2008 A1
20080082026 Schmidt et al. Apr 2008 A1
20080091125 Owen et al. Apr 2008 A1
20080126665 Burr et al. May 2008 A1
20080177180 Azhari et al. Jul 2008 A1
20080194965 Sliwa et al. Aug 2008 A1
20080214964 Chapelon et al. Sep 2008 A1
20080262345 Fichtinger et al. Oct 2008 A1
20080262486 Zvuloni et al. Oct 2008 A1
20080312561 Chauhan Dec 2008 A1
20080319376 Wilcox et al. Dec 2008 A1
20090030339 Cheng et al. Jan 2009 A1
20090112098 Vaezy et al. Apr 2009 A1
20090177085 Maxwell et al. Jul 2009 A1
20090198094 Fenster et al. Aug 2009 A1
20090211587 Lawrentschuk Aug 2009 A1
20090227874 Suri et al. Sep 2009 A1
20090230822 Kushculey et al. Sep 2009 A1
20100011845 Laugharn et al. Jan 2010 A1
20100059264 Hasegawa et al. Mar 2010 A1
20100069797 Cain et al. Mar 2010 A1
20100125225 Gelbart et al. May 2010 A1
20100152624 Tanis et al. Jun 2010 A1
20100163694 Fadler et al. Jul 2010 A1
20100261994 Davalos et al. Oct 2010 A1
20100274136 Cerofolini Oct 2010 A1
20100286519 Lee et al. Nov 2010 A1
20100305432 Duhay et al. Dec 2010 A1
20100317971 Fan et al. Dec 2010 A1
20110040190 Jahnke et al. Feb 2011 A1
20110054315 Roberts et al. Mar 2011 A1
20110054363 Cain et al. Mar 2011 A1
20110112400 Emery et al. May 2011 A1
20110118602 Weng et al. May 2011 A1
20110172529 Gertner Jul 2011 A1
20110178444 Slayton et al. Jul 2011 A1
20110251528 Canney et al. Oct 2011 A1
20110257524 Gertner Oct 2011 A1
20110263967 Bailey et al. Oct 2011 A1
20120010541 Cain et al. Jan 2012 A1
20120029353 Slayton et al. Feb 2012 A1
20120059264 Hope Simpson et al. Mar 2012 A1
20120059285 Soltani et al. Mar 2012 A1
20120092724 Pettis Apr 2012 A1
20120130288 Holland et al. May 2012 A1
20120172720 Kawabata Jul 2012 A1
20120189998 Kruecker et al. Jul 2012 A1
20120232388 Curra et al. Sep 2012 A1
20120259250 Sapozhnikov et al. Oct 2012 A1
20120271167 Holland et al. Oct 2012 A1
20120271223 Khanna Oct 2012 A1
20130041293 Cain Feb 2013 A1
20130053691 Kawabata et al. Feb 2013 A1
20130090579 Cain et al. Apr 2013 A1
20130102932 Cain et al. Apr 2013 A1
20130190623 Bertolina et al. Jul 2013 A1
20130269982 Teofilovic Oct 2013 A1
20130289593 Hall et al. Oct 2013 A1
20130303906 Cain et al. Nov 2013 A1
20140058293 Hynynen et al. Feb 2014 A1
20140073995 Teofilovic et al. Mar 2014 A1
20140100459 Xu et al. Apr 2014 A1
20140128734 Genstler et al. May 2014 A1
20150375015 Cain Dec 2015 A1
20160135916 Rakic et al. May 2016 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (41)
Number Date Country
102481164 May 2012 CN
3220751 Dec 1933 DE
3544628 Jun 1987 DE
3817094 Nov 1989 DE
4012760 May 1992 DE
0017382 Oct 1980 EP
0320303 Jun 1989 EP
0332871 Sep 1989 EP
0384831 Aug 1990 EP
0755653 Jan 1997 EP
1374785 Jan 2004 EP
1504713 Feb 2005 EP
2397188 Dec 2011 EP
2099582 Dec 1982 GB
60-80779 May 1985 JP
61-196718 Aug 1986 JP
HEI 2-215451 Aug 1990 JP
HEI 6-197907 Jul 1994 JP
HEI 7504339 May 1995 JP
08-84740 Apr 1996 JP
06-304178 May 1996 JP
08-131454 May 1996 JP
09-55571 Feb 1997 JP
HEI 10-512477 Dec 1998 JP
2000300559 Oct 2000 JP
2003-510159 Mar 2003 JP
2004-505660 Feb 2004 JP
2005167058 Jun 2005 JP
2007520307 Jul 2007 JP
2010019554 Jan 2010 JP
2010029650 Feb 2010 JP
2010204068 Sep 2010 JP
2004-512502 Apr 2014 JP
WO 9406355 Mar 1994 WO
WO 0232506 Apr 2002 WO
WO2005018469 Mar 2005 WO
WO 2008051484 May 2008 WO
WO2011040054 Jul 2011 WO
WO 2011092683 Aug 2011 WO
WO2011154654 Dec 2011 WO
WO2015000953 Jan 2015 WO
Non-Patent Literature Citations (95)
Entry
Maxwell et al., Cavitation clouds created by shock scattering from bubbles during histotripsy, Oct. 2011, J. Acoust. Soc. Am., vol. 130, No. 4, pp. 1888-1898.
Avtech; AVR-8 Data sheet; May 23, 2004; 3 pages; retrieved from the internet (http//www.avtechpulse.com).
Lin et al.; U.S. Appl. No. 14/656,633 entitled “Frequency compounding ultrasound pulses for imaging and therapy,” filed Mar. 12, 2015.
Lin et al; Dual-beam histotripsy: a low-frequency pump enabling a high-frequency probe for precise lesion formation; IEEE Trans. Ultrason. Ferroelectr. Control; 61(2); pp. 325-340; Feb. 2014; (Author Manuscript; 29 pages).
Jahnke et al.; U.S. Appl. No. 14/746,692 entitled “Disposable acoustic coupling medium container,” filed Jun. 22, 2015.
Akiyama et al.; Elliptically curved acoustic lens for emitting strongly focused finite-amplitude beams: Application of the spheroidal beam equation model to the theoretical prediction; Acoustical Science and Technology, vol. 26, pp. 279-284, May 2005.
Appel et al.; Stereoscopic highspeed recording of bubble filaments; Ultrasonics Sonochemistry; vol. 11(1); pp. 39-42; Jan. 2004.
Aschoff et al.; How does alteration of hepatic blood flow affect liver perfusion and radiofrequency-induced thermal lesion size in rabbit liver?; J Magn Reson Imaging; 13(1); pp. 57-63; Jan. 2001.
Atchley et al.; Thresholds for cavitation produced in water by pulsed ultrasound; Ultrasonics.⋅, vol. 26(5); pp. 280-285; Sep. 1988.
Avago Technologies; ACNV2601 High Insulation Voltage 10 MBd Digital Opotcoupler. Avago Technologies Data Sheet; pp. 1-11; Jul. 29, 2010.
Bjoerk et al.; Cool/MOS CP—How to make most beneficial use of the generation of super junction technology devices. lnfineon Technologies AG. Feb. 2007 [retrieved Feb. 4, 2014] from the internet (http://www.infineon.com/dgdl/Infineon+-+Application+Note+-+PowerMOSFETs+-+600V+CoolMOS%E284%A2+-+CP+Most+beneficial+use+of+superjunction+technologie+devices.pdf?folderId=db3a304412b407950112b408e8c90004&fileId=db3a304412b407950112b40ac9a40688>pp. 1, 4, 14.
Bland et al.; Surgical Oncology; McGraw Hill; Chap. 5 (Cavitron Ultrasonic Aspirator); pp. 461-462; Jan. 29, 2001.
Burdin et al.; Implementation of the laser diffraction technique for cavitation bubble investigations; Particle & Particle Systems Characterization; vol. 19; pp. 73-83; May 2002.
Cain, Charles A.; Histotripsy: controlled mechanical sub-division of soft tissues by high intensity pulsed ultrasound (conference presentation); American Institute of Physics (AIP) Therapeutic Ultrasound: 5th International Symposium on Therapeutic Ultrasound; 44 pgs.; Oct. 27-29, 2005.
Canney et al.; Shock-Induced Heating and Millisecond Boiling in Gels and Tissue Due to High Intensity Focused Ultrasound; Ultrasound in Medicine & Biology, vol. 36, pp. 250-267; Feb. 2010 (author manuscript).
Chan et al.; An image-guided high intensity focused ultrasound device for uterine fibroids treatment; Medical Physics, vol. 29, pp. 2611-2620, Nov. 2002.
Clasen et al.; MR-guided radiofrequency ablation of hepatocellular carcinoma: Long-term effectiveness; J Vase Intery Radiol; 22(6); pp. 762-770; Jun. 2011.
Clement et al.; A hemisphere array for non-invasive ultrasound brain therapy and surgery; Physics in Medicine and Biology, vol. 45, p. 3707-3719, Dec. 2000.
Cline et al.; Magnetic resonance-guided thermal surgery; Magnetic Resonance in Medicine; 30(1); pp. 98-106; Jul. 1993.
Curiel et al.; Elastography for the follow-up of high-intensity focused ultrasound prostate cancer treatment: Initial comparison with MRI; Ultrasound Med. Biol; 31(11); pp. 1461-1468; Nov. 2005.
Desilets et al.; The Design of Efficient Broad-Band Piezoelectric Transducers; Sonics and Ultrasonics, IEEE Transactions on, vol. 25, pp. 115-125, May 1978.
Emelianov et al.; Triplex ultrasound: Elasticity imaging to age deep venous thrombosis; Ultrasound Med Biol; 28(6); pp. 757-767; Jun. 2002.
Giannatsis et al.; Additive fabrication technologies applied to medicine and health care: a review; The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology; 40(1-2); pp. 116-127; Jan. 2009.
Gudra et al.; Influence of acoustic impedance of multilayer acoustic systems on the transfer function of ultrasonic airborne transducers; Ultrasonics, vol. 40, pp. 457-463, May 2002.
Hall et al.; A Low Cost Compact 512 Channel Therapeutic Ultrasound System for Transcutaneous Ultrasound Surgery; AIP Conference Proceedings, Boston, MA; vol. 829, pp. 445-449, Oct. 27-29, 2005.
Hall et al.; Acoustic Access to the Prostate for Extracorporeal Ultrasound Ablation; Journal of Endourology, vol. 24, pp. 1875-1881, Nov. 2010.
Hall et al.; Histotripsy of the prostate: dose effects in a chronic canine model; Urology; 74(4); pp. 932-937; Oct. 2009 (author manuscript).
Hall et al.; Imaging feedback of tissue liquefaction (histotripsy) in ultrasound surgery; IEEE Ultrasonic Symposium, Sep. 18-21, 2005, pp. 1732-1734.
Hartmann; Ultrasonic properties of poly(4-methyl pentene-1), Journal of Applied Physics, vol. 51, pp. 310-314, Jan. 1980.
Holland et al.; Thresholds for transient cavitation produced by pulsed ultrasound in a controlled nuclei environment; J. Acoust. Soc. Am.; vol. 88(5); pp. 2059-2069; Nov. 1990.
Huber et al.; Influence of shock wave pressure amplitude and pulse repetition frequency on the lifespan, size and number of transient cavities in the field of an electromagnetic lithotripter; Physics in Medicine and Biology; vol. 43 (10); pp. 3113-3128; Oct. 1998.
Hynynen et al.; Tissue thermometry during ultrasound exposure; European Urology; 23(Suppl 1); pp. 12-16; 1993 (year of pub. sufficiently earlier than effective US filing date and any foreign priority date).
Kallel et al.; The feasibility of elastographic visualization of HIFU-induced thermal lesions in soft tissues: Image-guided high-intensity focused ultrasound; Ultrasound Med. Biol; 25(4); pp. 641-647; May 1999.
Kim et al.; Dependence of particle volume fraction on sound velocity and attenuation of EPDM composites; Ultrasonics, vol. 46, pp. 177-183, Feb. 2007.
Konofagou; Quo vadis elasticity imaging?; Ultrasonics; 42(1-9); pp. 331-336; Apr. 2004.
Krimholtz et al.; New equivalent circuits for elementary piezoelectric transducers; Electronics Letters, vol. 6, pp. 398-399, Jun. 1970.
Kruse et al.; Tissue characterization using magnetic resonance elastography: Preliminary results; Phys. Med. Biol; 45(6); pp. 1579-1590; Jun. 2000.
Lake et al.; Histotripsy: minimally invasive technology for prostatic tissue ablation in an in vivo canine model; Urology; 72(3); pp. 682-686; Sep. 2008.
Lauterborn et al.; Cavitation bubble dynamics studied by high speed photography and holography: part one; Ultrasonics; vol. 23; pp. 260-268; Nov. 1985.
Lensing et al.; Deep-vein thrombosis; The Lancet, vol. 353, pp. 479-485, Feb. 6, 1999.
Liu et al.; Real-time 2-D temperature imaging using ultrasound; IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 57(1); pp. 12-16; Jan. 2010 (author manuscript, 16 pgs.).
Liu et al.; Viscoelastic property measurement in thin tissue constructs using ultrasound; IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control; 55(2); pp. 368-383; Feb. 2008 (author manuscript, 37 pgs.).
Manes et al.; Design of a Simplified Delay System for Ultrasound Phased Array Imaging; Sonics and Ultrasonics, IEEE Transactions on, vol. 30, pp. 350-354, Nov. 1983.
Maréchal et al; Effect of Radial Displacement of Lens on Response of Focused Ultrasonic Transducer; Japanese Journal of Applied Physics, vol. 46, p. 3077-3085; May 15, 2007.
Maréchal et al; Lens-focused transducer modeling using an extended KLM model; Ultrasonics, vol. 46, pp. 155-167, May 2007.
Martin et al.; Water-cooled, high-intensity ultrasound surgical applicators with frequency tracking; Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control, IEEE Transactions on, vol. 50, pp. 1305-1317, Oct. 2003.
Maxwell et al.; Noninvasive Thrombolysis Using Pulsed Ultrasound Cavitation Therapy Histotripsy; Ultrasound in Medicine & Biology, vol. 35, pp. 1982-1994, Dec. 2009 (author manuscript).
Maxwell; Noninvasive thrombolysis using histotripsy pulsed ultrasound cavitation therapy; PhD Dissertation. University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan. Jun. 2012.
Miller et al.; A review of in vitro bioeffects of inertial ultrasonic cavitation from a mechanistic perspective; Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology; vol. 22; pp. 1131-1154; (year of publication is sufficiently earlier than the effective U.S. filing date and any foreign priority date) 1996.
Nightingale et al.; Analysis of contrast in images generated with transient acoustic radiation force; Ultrasound Med Biol; 32(1); pp. 61-72; Jan. 2006.
Ohl et al.; Bubble dynamics, shock waves and sonoluminescence; Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. A; vol. 357; pp. 269-294; (year of publication is sufficiently earlier than the effective U.S. filing date and any foreign priority date) 1999.
Okada et al.; A case of hepatocellular carcinoma treated by MR-guided focused ultrasound ablation with respiratory gating; Magn Reson Med Sci; 5(3); pp. 167-171; Oct. 2006.
Palmeri et al.; Acoustic radiation force-based elasticity imaging methods; Interface Focus; 1; pp. 553-564; Aug. 2011.
Parsons et al.; Cost-effective assembly of a basic fiber-optic hydrophone for measurement of high-amplitude therapeutic ultrasound fields; The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, vol. 119, pp. 1432-1440, Mar. 2006.
Parsons et al.; Pulsed cavitational ultrasound therapy for controlled tissue homogenization; Ultrasound in Med. & Biol.; vol. 32(1); pp. 115-129; Jan. 2006.
Pishchalnikov et al.; Cavitation Bubble Cluster Activity in the Breakage of Kidney Stones by Lithotripter Shock Waves; J Endourol.; 17(7): 435-446; Sep. 2003.
Porter et al.; Reduction in left ventricular cavitary attenuation and improvement in posterior myocardial contrast . . . ; J Am Soc Echocardiography; pp. 437-441; Jul.-Aug. 1996.
Roberts et al.; Pulsed cavitational ultrasound: a noninvasive technology for controlled tissue ablation (histotripsy) in the rabbit kidney; Journal of Urology; vol. 175(2); pp. 734-738; Feb. 2006.
Rosenschein et al.; Ultrasound Imaging-Guided Noninvasive Ultrasound Thrombolysis: Preclinical Results; Circulation; vol. 102; pp. 238-245, Jul. 11, 2000.
Rowland et al.; MRI study of hepatic tumours following high intensity focused ultrasound surgery; British Journal of Radiology; 70; pp. 144-153; Feb. 1997.
Roy et al.; A precise technique for the measurement of acoustic cavitation thresholds and some preliminary results; Journal of the Acoustical Society of America; vol. 78(5); pp. 1799-1805; Nov. 1985.
Sapareto et al.; Thermal dose determination in cancer therapy; Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 10(6); pp. 787-800; Apr. 1984.
Sapozhnikov et al.; Ultrasound-Guided Localized Detection of Cavitation During Lithotripsy in Pig Kidney in Vivo; IEEE Ultrasonics Symposium, vol. 2; pp. 1347-1350; Oct. 7-10, 2001.
Sato et al.; Experimental Investigation of Phased Array Using Tapered Matching Layers. 2002 IEEE Ultrasound Symposium. vol. 2; pp. 1235-1238, Oct. 2002.
Simonin et al.; Characterization of heterogeneous structure in a polymer object manufactured by stereolithography with low-frequency microechography; Journal of Materials Chemistry; vol. 6, pp. 1595-1599, Sep. 1996.
Sokolov et al.; Use of a dual-pulse lithotripter to generate a localized and intensified cavitation field; Journal of the Acoustical Society of America; vol. 110(3); pp. 1685-1695; Sep. 2001.
Song et al.; Feasibility of Using Lateral Mode Coupling Method for a Large Scale Ultrasound Phased Array for Noninvasive Transcranial Therapy; Biomedical Engineering; IEEE Transactions on, vol. 57, pp. 124-133; Jan. 2010 (author manuscript).
Souchon et al.; Visualisation of HIFU lesions using elastography of the human prostate in vivo: Preliminary results; Ultrasound Med. Biol; 29(7); pp. 1007-1015; Jul. 2003.
Souquet et al.; Design of Low-Loss Wide-Band Ultrasonic Transducers for Noninvasive Medical Application; Sonics and Ultrasonics, IEEE Transactions on, vol. 26, pp. 75-80, Mar. 1979.
Therapeutic Ultrasound Group. Non-invasive Ultrasonic Tissue Fraction for Treatment of Benign Disease and Cancer—“Histotripsy”. University research [online]. Biomedical Engineering Department, University of Michigan. Jul. 2011[retrieved on Jan. 28, 2014] from: (http://web.archive.org/web/20110720091822/http://www.histotripsy.umich.edu/index.html>.entiredocument).
Toda; Narrowband impedance matching layer for high efficiency thickness mode ultrasonic transducers; Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control, IEEE Transactions on, vol. 49, pp. 299-306, Mar. 2002.
Van Kervel et al.; A calculation scheme for the optimum design of ultrasonic transducers; Ultrasonics, vol. 21, pp. 134-140, May 1983.
Wang et al.; Quantitative ultrasound backscatter for pulsed cavitational ultrasound therapy-histotripsy; Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control, IEEE Transactions on, vol. 56, pp. 995-1005, May 2009 (author manuscript).
Xie et al.; Correspondence of ultrasound elasticity imaging to direct mechanical measurement in aging DVT in rats; Ultrasound Med Biol; 31(10); pp. 1351-1359; Oct. 2005 (author manuscript, 20 pgs.).
Xu et al.; A new strategy to enhance cavitational tissue erosion by using a high intensity initiating sequence; IEEE Trans Ultrasonics Ferroelectrics and Freq Control; vol. 53(8); pp. 1412-1424; Aug. 2006.
Xu et al.; Controlled ultrasound tissue erosion: the role of dynamic interaction between insonation and microbubble activity; Journal of the Acoustical Society of America; vol. 117(1); pp. 424-435; Jan. 2005.
Xu et al.; Controlled ultrasound tissue erosion; IEEE Transaction on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics, and Frequency Control; vol. 51 (6); pp. 726-736; Jun. 2004.
Xu et al.; Effects of acoustic parameters on bubble cloud dynamics in ultrasound tissue erosion (histotripsy); Journal of the Acoustical Society of America; vol. 122(1); pp. 229-236; Jul. 2007.
Xu et al.; High Speed Imaging of Bubble Clouds Generated in Pulsed Ultrasound Cavitational Therapy Histotripsy; IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control; ; vol. 54; No. 10; pp. 2091R2101; Oct. 2007.
Xu et al.; Investigation of intensity threshold for ultrasound tissue erosion; Ultrasound in Med. & Biol.; vol. 31(12); pp. 1673-1682; Dec. 2005.
Xu et al.; Optical and acoustic monitoring of bubble cloud dynamics at a tissue-fluid interface in ultrasound tissue erosion; Journal of the Acoustical Society of America; vol. 121(4); pp. 2421-2430; Apr. 2007.
Yan et al.; A review of rapid prototyping technologies and systems; Computer-Aided Design, vol. 28, pp. 307-318, Apr. 1996.
Zhang et al.; A fast tissue stiffness-dependent elastography for HIFU-induced lesions inspection; Ultrasonics; 51(8); pp. 857-869; Dec. 2011.
Zheng et al.; An acoustic backscatter-based method for localization of lesions induced by high-intensity focused ultrasound; Ultrasound Med Biol; 36(4); pp. 610-622; Apr. 2010.
Arani et al.; Transurethral prostate magnetic resonance elestography; prospective imaging requirements; Magn. Reson. Med.; 65(2); pp. 340-349; Feb. 2011.
Avago Technologies; Avago's ACNV2601 optocoupler is an optically coupled logic gate; Data Sheet; 2 pages; Jul. 29, 2010.
Billson et al.; Rapid prototyping technologies for ultrasonic beam focussing in NDE; IEEE International Ultrasonic Symposium Proceedings; pp. 2472-2472; Oct. 2011.
Khokhlova et al.; Controlled tissue emulsification produced by high intensity focused ultrasound shock waves and millisecond boiling; J. Acoust. Soc. Am.; 130(5), pt. 2; pp. 3498-3510; Nov. 2011.
Miller et al.; Investigation of the mechanism of ARFI-based color doppler feedback of histotripsy tissue fractionation; Ultrasonic Symposium (IUS); 2013 IEEE International; 4 pages; Jul. 21-25, 2013.
Miller et al.; Real-time elastography-based monitoring of histotripsy tissue fractionation using color doppler; Ultrasonics Symposium (IUS); 2012 IEEE International; 8 pages; Oct. 7-10, 2012.
Cain et al.; U.S. Appl. No. 14/911,273 entitled “Histotripsy using very short ultrasound pulses,” filed Feb. 10, 2016.
Hobarth et al.; Color flow doppler sonography for extracorporal shock wave lithotripsy; Journal of Urology; 150(6); pp. 1768-1770; Dec. 1, 1993.
Maxwell et al.; In-vivo study of non-invasive thrombolysis by histotripsy in a porcine model; IEEE international Ultrasonics Symposium; IEEE; p. 220-223; Sep. 20, 2009.
Urban et al.; Measurement of prostate viscoelasticity using shearwave dispersion ultrasound vibrometry (SDUV): an in vitro study; IEEE International Ultrasonics Symposium Proceedings (IUS); pp. 1141-1144; Oct. 11, 2010.
Wikipedia; Medical ultrasound; 15 pages; retrieved from the internet (https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Medical_utrasound&oldid=515340960) on Jan. 12, 2018.
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20150011916 A1 Jan 2015 US
Provisional Applications (1)
Number Date Country
61842820 Jul 2013 US