All publications and patent applications mentioned in this specification are herein incorporated by reference to the same extent as if each individual publication or patent application was specifically and individually indicated to be incorporated by reference.
This disclosure generally relates to treating tissue with cavitation created by ultrasound therapy.
Histotripsy, or pulsed ultrasound cavitation therapy, is a technology where short, intense bursts of acoustic energy induce controlled cavitation (microbubble or bubble cloud formation) within the focal volume. The vigorous expansion and collapse of these microbubbles mechanically homogenizes cells and tissue structures within the focal volume. This is a very different end result than the coagulative necrosis characteristic of thermal ablation. To operate within a non-thermal, Histotripsy realm; it is necessary to deliver acoustic energy in the form of high pressure amplitude acoustic pulses with low duty cycle.
Compared with conventional focused ultrasound technologies, Histotripsy has important advantages: 1) the destructive process at the focus is mechanical, not thermal; 2) bubble clouds appear bright on ultrasound imaging thereby confirming correct targeting and localization of treatment; 3) treated tissue appears darker (hypoechoic) on ultrasound imaging, so that the operator knows what has been treated; and 4) Histotripsy produces lesions in a controlled and precise manner. It is important to emphasize that unlike microwave, radiofrequency, or high-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU), Histotripsy is not a thermal modality.
Early canine studies of Histotripsy homogenization of prostate tissue employed a therapy transducer that was positioned to deliver Histotripsy transabdominally. In these studies, the prostate was located only a short distance from the skin surface and there was a relatively wide path from the transducer through the skin to focus ultrasound energy. Consequently, the spherical Histotripsy therapy transducer employed in these studies had 14 cm aperture and 10 cm focal length (F-number=0.71). Histotripsy therapy transducers with high F-numbers have very low efficiency compared to transducers with low F-numbers. These inefficiencies are primarily due to nonlinear acoustic propagation leading to shockwave formation.
Specialized therapy transducer and drive electronics have been designed to focus Histotripsy therapy through the perineum to the prostate. One example of a therapy transducer 100 configured to deliver Histotripsy therapy to the prostate is shown in
Based on bench-top experimentation and modeling, an initial set of therapy transducer excitation parameters (3 cycles/pulse, 750 Vpp, 500 Hz PRF (Pulse Repetition Frequency)) was selected for canine testing with this transducer. This excitation sequence produced a non-linear focal pressure waveform with a peak negative and peak positive pressure of approximately 25 MPa and 100 MPa in water. We define this sequence and its variants as a, standard, or non-optimized, sequence because the sequence parameters were not optimized for bubble cloud formation.
This standard excitation sequence and variants were used to treat approximately 30 canine subjects to establish feasibility, dosing (cumulative number of pulses), and treatment implementation guidelines. An additional 10 canine subjects were then treated in a confirmatory study. Although, these studies yielded outstanding efficacy results, the observation of apparent minor injury (subclinical fibrosis) to the prefocal abdominal rectus muscle in 2 of 10 subjects in the confirmatory trial led to the conclusion that the safety profile needed to be improved by developing Histotripsy pulse sequences that deliver energy more efficiently. It is likely that the need to improve the efficiency of Histotripsy will become more important as transducers are developed to go deeper into tissues through skeletal anatomical obstructions.
Improved efficiency leading to pre-focal heat reduction is imperative when soft tissue is targeted deep beneath the skin surface through skeletal anatomical obstructions which require ultrasound therapy transducers that have relatively high F numbers (F-number >0.8). Sequences optimized for enhanced Histotripsy homogenization of soft tissues were developed to reduce the potential of pre-focal thermal injury by optimizing the sequence efficiency. Improved efficiency of optimized excitation sequences increases the probability of initiating Histotripsy bubble clouds in tissue and reduces the occurrences of extinguishing bubble clouds when translating through tissues. Additionally, optimized sequences can be designed to selectively ablate fibrous tissues or ablate less dense tissues while preserving more fibro-elastic vital structures such as neuro-vascular structures.
Effective optimized sequences for high F-number transducers are characterized by an initiation pulse which is designed to create a least a single acoustically generated nucleus (bubble), followed by a shock scattering pulse (hereafter referred to as a scattering pulse or scattering pressure waveform) after an optimized time delay to enable a shockwave to impinge upon the first bubble to create a bubble cloud. Subsequent scattering pulses can follow also with optimized timing in order to further maintain the effectiveness of the bubble cloud. Note that pulse and pressure waveform will be used interchangeably in this application.
A method of treating tissue with ultrasound energy, comprising the steps of delivering an initiation pressure waveform from an ultrasound therapy transducer into tissue, the initiation pressure waveform being configured to produce at least one bubble in the tissue, delivering a scattering pressure waveform from the ultrasound therapy transducer into the at least one bubble within a life-cycle of the at least one bubble, and producing cavitation nuclei near the at least one bubble with the scattering pressure waveform.
In some embodiments, the scattering pressure waveform is delivered within 5 μs to 200 μs of the initiation pressure waveform.
In one embodiment, the method further comprises repeating the delivering an initiation pressure waveform and delivering a scattering pressure waveform steps until treatment of the tissue is completed.
In one embodiment, a pressure amplitude and/or number of cycles of the initiation pressure waveform is minimized to reduce tissue heating.
In another embodiment, a peak-to-peak pressure of the scattering pressure waveform is sufficient in amplitude create additional cavitation nuclei in the focal region.
In alternative embodiments, the pressure amplitude and/or number of cycles of the scattering pressure waveform is minimized to reduce tissue heating.
In some embodiments the method further comprises, after delivering the scattering pressure waveform, delivering a second scattering pressure waveform towards the at least one bubble and the cavitation nuclei.
In some embodiments, the second scattering pressure waveform is delivered within 5 μs to 1 s of the scattering pressure waveform.
In another embodiment, the method further comprises delivering additional scattering pressure waveforms without delivering additional initiation pressure waveforms until the at least one bubble and/or the cavitation nuclei no longer remain in the tissue.
In some embodiments, the additional scattering pressure waveforms are delivered every 5 μs to 1 s.
In one embodiment, a pulse sequence comprising the initiation pressure waveform and the scattering pressure waveform has a sequence PRF ranging from 1-5000 Hz.
In other embodiments, the scattering pressure waveform delivers less energy to intervening tissue than the initiation pressure waveform.
In one embodiment, the initiation pressure waveform and the scattering pressure waveform have substantially similar pressure amplitudes. In another embodiment, a pressure amplitude of the scattering pressure waveform is less than a pressure amplitude of the initiation pressure waveform. In alternative embodiments, a pressure amplitude of the scattering pressure waveform is more than a pressure amplitude of the initiation pressure waveform.
A method of treating tissue with ultrasound energy is provided, comprising the steps of transmitting an initiation pressure waveform from an ultrasound therapy transducer into tissue, the initiation pressure waveform being configured to produce at least one bubble in the tissue, during a life-cycle of the at least one bubble, transmitting a scattering pressure waveform from the ultrasound therapy transducer into the at least one bubble, the scattering pressure waveform configured to become a shocked focal pressure waveform in the tissue having a shocked positive pressure half cycle and a shocked negative pressure half cycle, the shocked positive pressure half cycle being configured to impinge on the at least one bubble and to scatter, invert, and constructively interfere with the shocked negative pressure half cycle to form a negative pressure half cycle waveform, and producing cavitation nuclei near the at least one bubble with a shock scattering mechanism between the positive pressure half cycle waveform and the at least one bubble.
A method of delivering ultrasound energy to tissue is provided, comprising the steps of delivering an initiation pulse from an ultrasound therapy transducer configured to provide at least 5 MPa of peak negative pressure to produce at least one bubble in the tissue, delivering a first scattering pulse into the at least one bubble within 5 μs to 200 μs of the initiation pulse, and producing a cavitation cloud of nuclei near the at least one bubble with a shock scattering mechanism between the first scattering pulse and the at least one bubble.
An ultrasound therapy system is provided, comprising an ultrasound therapy transducer, and an ultrasound therapy generator coupled to the ultrasound therapy transducer, the ultrasound therapy generator configured to drive the ultrasound therapy transducer to deliver an initiation pressure waveform into tissue to produce at least one bubble in tissue, the ultrasound therapy generator being further configured to drive the ultrasound therapy transducer to deliver a first scattering pressure waveform within 5 μs to 200 μs of the initiation pressure waveform into the at least one bubble to produce cavitation nuclei near the at least one bubble.
In some embodiments, a peak to peak pressure of the first scattering pulse is sufficient in pressure amplitude to produce cavitation nuclei near the at least one bubble.
In other embodiments, the ultrasound therapy generator is further configured to drive the ultrasound therapy transducer to deliver at least one additional scattering pulse after the first scattering pressure waveform to produce cavitation nuclei near the at least one bubble.
In one embodiment, the ultrasound therapy generator further comprises a controller configured to generate complex waveforms to initiate the initiation and scattering pressure waveforms, a high voltage power supply coupled to the controller, an amplifier configured to receive and amplify the complex waveforms from the controller and high voltage power supply, and a matching network configured to match an impedance of the ultrasound therapy transducer to the amplifier.
A method of treating tissue with ultrasound energy is provided, comprising the steps of producing at least one bubble in the tissue with ultrasound energy, colliding a shocked focal pressure waveform with the at least one bubble, and forming cavitation nuclei near the at least one bubble.
In one embodiment, the colliding step is performed during a life-cycle of the at least one bubble.
In another embodiment, the colliding step is performed within 5 μs to 200 μS of the producing step.
In an alternative embodiment, the forming cavitation nuclei step is achieved with a shock scattering mechanism between the shocked focal pressure waveform and the at least one bubble.
The novel features of the invention are set forth with particularity in the claims that follow. A better understanding of the features and advantages of the present invention will be obtained by reference to the following detailed description that sets forth illustrative embodiments, in which the principles of the invention are utilized, and the accompanying drawings of which:
Generation of Cavitation
Several principles of cavitation nuclei and bubble cloud formation that provide important background information for the development of the preferred embodiment are disclosed herein. Cavitation nuclei are individual bubbles formed as a result of the delivery of low pressure to tissue. Bubble clouds can comprise of dense clusters of cavitation nuclei that form at or near the transducer focus. The formation of cavitation nuclei (bubble clouds) are both key components of Histotripsy therapy.
Probability for Forming Cavitation Nuclei
Cavitation nuclei can be formed in tissue if the tissue is subjected to a peak negative (peak rarefaction) pressure approaching or exceeding the pressure level needed to create at least a single cavitation nucleus (bubble). Note that this level is variable and is dependent upon multiple factors including tissue properties (structure and composition, dissolved gas content, and existence of impurities), transducer geometry (focal distance and f number), and sequencing scheme (PRF; number of cycles). The number of cavitation nuclei formed from one acoustic pulse has been shown to be directly related to the peak negative pressure achieved.
Cavitation Time Course
Cavitation nuclei grow to a maximum size and then collapse. The cavitation time course for the process of bubble initiation, growth, and then collapse is dependent on the medium (i.e., tissue type). The cavitation time course for liquids is longer than in gelatin and soft tissue. Table 1 compares cavitation initiation, growth, and collapse times in water vs. gelatin.
Acoustic Shock and the Shock Scattering Mechanism for Bubble Cloud Formation
As a sound waveform travels through the medium the positive (compression) half cycle(s) travel faster than the negative (rarefaction) half cycle(s). This effect causes the pressure waveform to become nonlinear creating a sharp transition between negative and positive half cycles of the pressure waveform. The pressure amplitude of the positive half cycle increases as the slope of this transition increases and the pressure waveform is said to be become more nonlinear or “shocked”. This can be referred to as a shocked focal pressure waveform. The level of nonlinearity is dependent upon the pressure amplitude of the pressure waveform as well as the distance propagated through the medium.
According to the present disclosure, cavitation nuclei can be formed in tissue as a result of shock scattering. Shock scattering occurs when a shocked positive pressure half cycle of an acoustic waveform is reflected, or scattered, off of a pre-existing bubble(s) and the shocked positive pressure half cycle is consequently inverted such that it combines with the incident negative pressure half cycle of the acoustic waveform in an additive fashion. If this combined new negative pressure half cycle produced is large enough (i.e. above the intrinsic threshold for the tissue or medium of interest—greater than 5 MPa peak negative pressure for example), additional cavitation nuclei will form near any preexisting nuclei. This process repeats itself until the combined new negative pressure half cycle is not sufficient in pressure to create new cavitation nuclei.
In
Cavitation nuclei formed by this shock scattering method tend to grow towards the therapy transducer and their extent depends on the number of high pressure cycles in the pulse (waveform) and the pulse repetition frequency (PRF). Minimizing the number of cycles in a shocked waveform or reducing the sequence PRF are effective ways of reducing the length of the bubble cloud and also reducing the time average intensity and therefore the thermal dose.
Enhanced Bubble Cloud Formation Using Shock Scattering
The key components of a preferred Histotripsy excitation sequence described in this disclosure are: 1) A first pulse of the sequence, referred to as an initiation pulse or initiation pressure waveform, configured to form at least one bubble in the tissue 2) A second pulse of the sequence, referred to as a scattering pulse or scattering pressure waveform, configured to generate cavitation nuclei near the at least one bubble through shock scattering, and 3) A specific time delay between the initiation and scattering pulses.
The key parameters for the pulses are: The initiation pulse should be configured to produce at least one bubble in the tissue of interest. This can be achieved with a traditional Histotripsy initiation pulse, as described above, or with other ultrasound techniques that can induce bubble formation in tissue due to boiling such as HIFU or boiling Histotripsy. The scattering pulse should have a peak-to-peak pressure high enough for shock scattering formation of cavitation nuclei. In some embodiments, the time delay between these pulses can range between 5 μs and 200 μs. In another embodiment, the time delay between these pulses can range between 5 μs and 40 ms. In another embodiment, the time delay between these pulses can range between 5 μs and 1 s.
In another embodiment, the pressure amplitude and/or number of cycles used in the initiation pulse can be increased or decreased. Increasing the pressure amplitude and/or number of cycles in the initiation pulse may increase the probability of creating cavitation in the tissue. However this would also likely increase the time averaged intensity, and thermal dose, delivered to the tissue and the extent of the bubble cloud. Decreasing the pressure amplitude and/or number of cycles of the initiation pulse will reduce the intensity, and thermal dose, of the sequence but may limit the ability of the sequence to generate and/or maintain cavitation.
In another embodiment, the pressure amplitude and/or number of cycles used in the scattering pulse(s) can be increased or decreased. Increasing the pressure amplitude and/or number of cycles in the scattering pulse(s) may increase the probability of creating cavitation in the tissue. However this would also likely increase the time averaged intensity delivered to the tissue, and thermal dose, delivered to the tissue and the extent of the bubble cloud. Decreasing the pressure amplitude and/or number of cycles of the scattering pulse(s) will reduce the intensity, and thermal dose, of the sequence but may limit the ability of the sequence to generate and/or maintain cavitation.
The sequence PRF can be as high as 5000 Hz assuming that the time averaged intensity, and resultant thermal dose, are kept within safe limits. The preferred range depends on the tissues being treated. A higher PRF is recommended for more dense and fibrous tissues, and a low PRF is recommended for less dense tissues and for preservation of more fibrous and often vital tissues. Selective treatment of tissues with Histotripsy based on their stiffness can be a probable design and performance consideration for sequence development.
In some embodiments additional scattering pulses with lower pressure amplitude and/or number of cycles (compared with the initiation pulse pressure amplitude and/or number of cycles), can be applied in order to reduce the intensity, and thermal dose, of the sequence without reducing the sequence PRF.
Amplitude Reduction or Elimination of the Initiation Pulse Once the Bubble Cloud is Established:
The purpose of the initiation/scattering pair is to generate cavitation in tissue with shock scattering. Once the bubble cloud is generated, and if the focus is not moved, the initiation pulse may no longer be needed to maintain the effectiveness of the bubble cloud. In this case, the system could be designed to first create a bubble cloud with an initiation/scattering pair and follow that with lower pressure amplitude (relative to the initiation pulse pressure amplitude) scattering pulses until the focus is moved. At which point the process is repeated.
System Software and Hardware Design that Allowed for Sequence Development
A Histotripsy system and generator is configured to generate very complex waveforms in order to support the ultrasound pulse sequences described herein. A simplified block diagram of system 600 is shown in
All controls for the generator can be established using “Histotripsy Service Tool” software that can run on the computer/controller 602 (e.g., a standard PC) and communicates to the generator via USB serial communication 604.
The system 600 is configured to receive multiple sets of different driving parameters and loop them, which give the ability to the user to create wide range of custom sequences where all parameters (PRF, voltage amplitude, number of cycles, number of pulses per set, frequency, transducer element channels enabled, and time delays) can be set differently for every pulse generated. Time delays between pulses can be specified by the PRF for a parameter set or by specifying zero as the number of cycles per pulse.
For overall voltage amplitude regulation, level of high voltage is changed accordingly through the Microcontroller 606 and HV Controller 610. This method cannot be used for dynamic voltage amplitude changes between two pulses since it will take too long for all capacitors on the HV line to discharge. For dynamic voltage amplitude changes between pulses, PWM (pulse width modulation) is used at the FPGA 608 where the duty cycle of the pulse is modulated in order to produce the desired pulse voltage and resultant pressure amplitude.
Histotripsy Service Tool
Histotripsy Service Tool is an application that can be run on any PC and is used for controlling the system. The Histotripsy Service Tool can start/stop the therapy, set and read the level of high voltage, therapy parameters (PRF, number of cycles, duty ratio, channel enabled and delay, etc), and set and read other service and maintenance related items.
USB to Serial Converter
USB to Serial converter 604 converts USB combination to serial in order to communicate to the Microcontroller 606.
Microcontroller
The Microcontroller 606 communicates to the computer/controller 602 (Histotripsy Service Tool) to set/read working parameters, start/stop the therapy, etc. It can use internal flash memory to store all the parameters. The Microcontroller communicates to the FPGA 608 all driving parameters that are necessary to generate complex pulsing. It also communicates using serial communication to the high voltage controller and power supply 610 where it can set/read the proper level of driving voltage.
FPGA
The FPGA 608 receives the information from the Microcontroller 606 and it generates the complex pulsing sequence that is required to drive the amplifier 612. The FPGA can run on 100 MHz clock since speed of pulsing is critical to be timed in 10 ns increments.
High Voltage Controller and Power Supply
The High Voltage Controller and Power Supply 610 receives the commands from the Microcontroller 606 regarding the level of DC voltage that needs to be supplied to the amplifier circuitry in order to have an adequate voltage amplitude level at the output of the amplifier.
Amplifier
The Amplifier 612 receives pulses generated by the FPGA and is supplied with high voltage from High Voltage Controller and Power Supply. It generates high voltage amplitude pulses that are fed to the Therapy Transducer 614 through the matching network components which properly matches the impedance of the therapy transducer to the impedance of the amplifier. It is necessary to use a large number of capacitors that can store enough energy to support peak current demand during the generation of high voltage amplitude pulses.
The data structures and code described in this detailed description are typically stored on a computer-readable storage medium, which may be any device or medium that can store code and/or data for use by a computer system. The computer-readable storage medium includes, but is not limited to, volatile memory, non-volatile memory, magnetic and optical storage devices such as disk drives, magnetic tape, CDs (compact discs), DVDs (digital versatile discs or digital video discs), or other media capable of storing computer-readable media now known or later developed.
The methods and processes described in the detailed description section can be embodied as code and/or data, which can be stored in a computer-readable storage medium as described above. When a computer system reads and executes the code and/or data stored on the computer-readable storage medium, the computer system performs the methods and processes embodied as data structures and code and stored within the computer-readable storage medium.
Furthermore, the methods and processes described above can be included in hardware modules. For example, the hardware modules can include, but are not limited to, application-specific integrated circuit (ASIC) chips, field-programmable gate arrays (FPGAs), and other programmable-logic devices now known or later developed. When the hardware modules are activated, the hardware modules perform the methods and processes included within the hardware modules.
The examples and illustrations included herein show, by way of illustration and not of limitation, specific embodiments in which the subject matter may be practiced. As mentioned, other embodiments may be utilized and derived there from, such that structural and logical substitutions and changes may be made without departing from the scope of this disclosure. Such embodiments of the inventive subject matter may be referred to herein individually or collectively by the term “invention” merely for convenience and without intending to voluntarily limit the scope of this application to any single invention or inventive concept, if more than one is, in fact, disclosed. Thus, although specific embodiments have been illustrated and described herein, any arrangement calculated to achieve the same purpose may be substituted for the specific embodiments shown. This disclosure is intended to cover any and all adaptations or variations of various embodiments. Combinations of the above embodiments, and other embodiments not specifically described herein, will be apparent to those of skill in the art upon reviewing the above description.
This application claims the benefit under 35 U.S.C. 119 of U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 61/842,820, filed Jul. 3, 2013, titled “Modulated Excitation Sequences for Enhanced Pulsed Ultrasound Cavitational Therapy”, which application is incorporated herein by reference.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3243497 | Kendall et al. | Mar 1966 | A |
3679021 | Goldberg et al. | Jul 1972 | A |
4016749 | Wachter | Apr 1977 | A |
4024501 | Herring et al. | May 1977 | A |
4051394 | Tieden | Sep 1977 | A |
4117446 | Alais | Sep 1978 | A |
4269174 | Adair | May 1981 | A |
4277367 | Madsen et al. | Jul 1981 | A |
4351038 | Alais | Sep 1982 | A |
4406153 | Ophir et al. | Sep 1983 | A |
4440025 | Hayakawa et al. | Apr 1984 | A |
4453408 | Clayman | Jun 1984 | A |
4483345 | Miwa | Nov 1984 | A |
4549533 | Cain et al. | Oct 1985 | A |
4550606 | Drost | Nov 1985 | A |
4575330 | Hull | Mar 1986 | A |
4622972 | Giebeler, Jr. | Nov 1986 | A |
4625731 | Quedens et al. | Dec 1986 | A |
4641378 | McConnell et al. | Feb 1987 | A |
4669483 | Hepp et al. | Jun 1987 | A |
4689986 | Carson et al. | Sep 1987 | A |
4757820 | Itoh | Jul 1988 | A |
4791915 | Barsotti et al. | Dec 1988 | A |
4819621 | Ueberle et al. | Apr 1989 | A |
4829491 | Saugeon et al. | May 1989 | A |
4856107 | Dory | Aug 1989 | A |
4865042 | Umemura et al. | Sep 1989 | A |
4888746 | Wurster et al. | Dec 1989 | A |
4890267 | Rudolph | Dec 1989 | A |
4922917 | Dory | May 1990 | A |
4938217 | Lele | Jul 1990 | A |
4957099 | Hassler | Sep 1990 | A |
4973980 | Howkins et al. | Nov 1990 | A |
4984575 | Uchiyama et al. | Jan 1991 | A |
4991151 | Dory | Feb 1991 | A |
4995012 | Dory | Feb 1991 | A |
RE33590 | Dory | May 1991 | E |
5014686 | Schafer | May 1991 | A |
5065751 | Wolf | Nov 1991 | A |
5080101 | Dory | Jan 1992 | A |
5080102 | Dory | Jan 1992 | A |
5091893 | Smith et al. | Feb 1992 | A |
5092336 | Fink | Mar 1992 | A |
5097709 | Masuzawa et al. | Mar 1992 | A |
5111822 | Dory | May 1992 | A |
5143073 | Dory | Sep 1992 | A |
5143074 | Dory | Sep 1992 | A |
5150711 | Dory | Sep 1992 | A |
5158070 | Dory | Oct 1992 | A |
5158071 | Umemura et al. | Oct 1992 | A |
5163421 | Bernstein et al. | Nov 1992 | A |
5165412 | Okazaki | Nov 1992 | A |
5174294 | Saito et al. | Dec 1992 | A |
5209221 | Riedlinger | May 1993 | A |
5215680 | D'Arrigo | Jun 1993 | A |
5219401 | Cathignol et al. | Jun 1993 | A |
5230340 | Rhyne | Jul 1993 | A |
5295484 | Marcus et al. | Mar 1994 | A |
5316000 | Chapelon et al. | May 1994 | A |
5354258 | Dory | Oct 1994 | A |
5380411 | Schlief | Jan 1995 | A |
5409002 | Pell | Apr 1995 | A |
5431621 | Dory | Jul 1995 | A |
5435311 | Umemura et al. | Jul 1995 | A |
5443069 | Schaetzle | Aug 1995 | A |
5469852 | Nakamura et al. | Nov 1995 | A |
5474071 | Chapelon et al. | Dec 1995 | A |
5474531 | Carter | Dec 1995 | A |
5501655 | Rolt et al. | Mar 1996 | A |
5520188 | Hennige et al. | May 1996 | A |
5523058 | Umemura et al. | Jun 1996 | A |
5524620 | Rosenschein | Jun 1996 | A |
5540909 | Schutt | Jul 1996 | A |
5542935 | Unger et al. | Aug 1996 | A |
5558092 | Unger et al. | Sep 1996 | A |
5563346 | Bartelt et al. | Oct 1996 | A |
5566675 | Li et al. | Oct 1996 | A |
5573497 | Chapelon | Nov 1996 | A |
5580575 | Unger et al. | Dec 1996 | A |
5582578 | Zhong et al. | Dec 1996 | A |
5590657 | Cain et al. | Jan 1997 | A |
5601526 | Chapelon et al. | Feb 1997 | A |
5617862 | Cole et al. | Apr 1997 | A |
5648098 | Porter | Jul 1997 | A |
5666954 | Chapelon et al. | Sep 1997 | A |
5676452 | Scholz | Oct 1997 | A |
5676692 | Sanghvi et al. | Oct 1997 | A |
5678554 | Hossack et al. | Oct 1997 | A |
5694936 | Fujimoto et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
5695460 | Siegel et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
5717657 | Ruffa | Feb 1998 | A |
5724972 | Petrofsky | Mar 1998 | A |
5743863 | Chapelon | Apr 1998 | A |
5753929 | Bliss | May 1998 | A |
5759162 | Oppelt et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5766138 | Rattner | Jun 1998 | A |
5769790 | Watkins et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5797848 | Marian et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
5823962 | Schaetzle et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5827204 | Grandia et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5836896 | Rosenschein | Nov 1998 | A |
5849727 | Porter et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
5873902 | Sanghvi et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
5879314 | Peterson et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5932807 | Mallart | Aug 1999 | A |
5947904 | Hossack et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
6001069 | Tachibana et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6022309 | Celliers et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6036667 | Manna et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6088613 | Unger | Jul 2000 | A |
6093883 | Sanghvi et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6113558 | Rosenschein et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6126607 | Whitmore, III et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6128958 | Cain | Oct 2000 | A |
6143018 | Beuthan et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6165144 | Talish et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6176842 | Tachibana et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6308585 | Nilsson et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6308710 | Silva | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6309355 | Cain et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6318146 | Madsen et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6321109 | Ben-Haim et al. | Nov 2001 | B2 |
6338566 | Verdier | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6344489 | Spears | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6391020 | Kurtz et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6413216 | Cain et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6419648 | Vitek et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6470204 | Uzgiris et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6488639 | Ribault et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6490469 | Candy | Dec 2002 | B2 |
6500141 | Irion et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6506154 | Ezion et al. | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6506171 | Vitek et al. | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6508774 | Acker et al. | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6511428 | Azuma et al. | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6511444 | Hynynen et al. | Jan 2003 | B2 |
6522142 | Freundlich | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6524251 | Rabiner et al. | Feb 2003 | B2 |
6536553 | Scanlon | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6543272 | Vitek | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6556750 | Constantino et al. | Apr 2003 | B2 |
6559644 | Froundlich et al. | May 2003 | B2 |
6576220 | Unger | Jun 2003 | B2 |
6599288 | Maguire et al. | Jul 2003 | B2 |
6607498 | Eshel | Aug 2003 | B2 |
6612988 | Maor et al. | Sep 2003 | B2 |
6613004 | Vitek et al. | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6613005 | Friedman et al. | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6626854 | Friedman et al. | Sep 2003 | B2 |
6626855 | Weng et al. | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6645162 | Friedman et al. | Nov 2003 | B2 |
6648839 | Manna et al. | Nov 2003 | B2 |
6666833 | Friedman et al. | Dec 2003 | B1 |
6685640 | Fry et al. | Feb 2004 | B1 |
6685657 | Jones | Feb 2004 | B2 |
6705994 | Vortman et al. | Mar 2004 | B2 |
6719449 | Laugharn, Jr. et al. | Apr 2004 | B1 |
6719694 | Weng et al. | Apr 2004 | B2 |
6735461 | Vitek et al. | May 2004 | B2 |
6736814 | Manna et al. | May 2004 | B2 |
6750463 | Riley | Jun 2004 | B1 |
6770031 | Hynynen et al. | Aug 2004 | B2 |
6775438 | Gaedke et al. | Aug 2004 | B1 |
6788977 | Fenn et al. | Sep 2004 | B2 |
6790180 | Vitek | Sep 2004 | B2 |
6820160 | Allman | Nov 2004 | B1 |
6852082 | Strickberger et al. | Feb 2005 | B2 |
6869439 | White et al. | Mar 2005 | B2 |
6890332 | Truckai et al. | May 2005 | B2 |
6929609 | Asafusa | Aug 2005 | B2 |
7004282 | Manna et al. | Feb 2006 | B2 |
7059168 | Hibi et al. | Jun 2006 | B2 |
7128711 | Medan et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7128719 | Rosenberg | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7175596 | Vitek et al. | Feb 2007 | B2 |
7196313 | Quinones | Mar 2007 | B2 |
7223239 | Schulze et al. | May 2007 | B2 |
7258674 | Cribbs et al. | Aug 2007 | B2 |
7273458 | Prausnitz et al. | Sep 2007 | B2 |
7273459 | Desilets et al. | Sep 2007 | B2 |
7300414 | Holland et al. | Nov 2007 | B1 |
7311679 | Desilets et al. | Dec 2007 | B2 |
7331951 | Eshel et al. | Feb 2008 | B2 |
7341569 | Soltani et al. | Mar 2008 | B2 |
7347855 | Eshel et al. | Mar 2008 | B2 |
7358226 | Dayton et al. | Apr 2008 | B2 |
7359640 | Onde et al. | Apr 2008 | B2 |
7367948 | O'Donnell et al. | May 2008 | B2 |
7374551 | Liang et al. | May 2008 | B2 |
7377900 | Vitek et al. | May 2008 | B2 |
7442168 | Novak et al. | Oct 2008 | B2 |
7462488 | Madsen et al. | Dec 2008 | B2 |
7559905 | Kagosaki et al. | Jul 2009 | B2 |
7656638 | Laakso et al. | Feb 2010 | B2 |
8057408 | Cain et al. | Nov 2011 | B2 |
8333115 | Garvey et al. | Dec 2012 | B1 |
8539813 | Cain et al. | Sep 2013 | B2 |
20010039420 | Burbank et al. | Nov 2001 | A1 |
20010041163 | Sugita et al. | Nov 2001 | A1 |
20020045890 | Celliers et al. | Apr 2002 | A1 |
20020078964 | Kovac et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020099356 | Unger et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20030092982 | Eppstein | May 2003 | A1 |
20030112922 | Burdette et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030149352 | Liang et al. | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20030157025 | Unger et al. | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20030181833 | Faragalla et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20030199857 | Eizenhofer | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030221561 | Milo | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20030236539 | Rabiner et al. | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20040127815 | Marchitto et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040138563 | Moehring et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040236248 | Svedman | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040243021 | Murphy et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050038339 | Chauhan et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050038361 | Zhong et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050152561 | Spencer | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050154314 | Quistgaard | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050283098 | Conston et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060060991 | Holsteyns et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060074303 | Chornenky et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060173387 | Hansmann et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060206028 | Lee et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060241466 | Ottoboni et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060241523 | Sinelnikov et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060264760 | Liu et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060293630 | Manna et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20070010805 | Fedewa et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070016039 | Vortman et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070044562 | Sarr | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070065420 | Johnson | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070083120 | Cain et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070161902 | Dan | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070167764 | Hynynen | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070205785 | Nilsson | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070219448 | Seip et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20080013593 | Kawabata | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080055003 | Unnikrishnan et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080082026 | Schmidt et al. | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080091125 | Owen et al. | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080126665 | Burr et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080177180 | Azhari et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080194965 | Sliwa et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080214964 | Chapelon et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080262345 | Fichtinger et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080262486 | Zvuloni et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080312561 | Chauhan | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20080319376 | Wilcox et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20090030339 | Cheng et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090112098 | Vaezy et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090177085 | Maxwell et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090198094 | Fenster et al. | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20090211587 | Lawrentschuk | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20090227874 | Suri et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090230822 | Kushculey et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20100011845 | Laugharn et al. | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100059264 | Hasegawa et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100069797 | Cain et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100125225 | Gelbart et al. | May 2010 | A1 |
20100152624 | Tanis et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100163694 | Fadler et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100261994 | Davalos et al. | Oct 2010 | A1 |
20100274136 | Cerofolini | Oct 2010 | A1 |
20100286519 | Lee et al. | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20100305432 | Duhay et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20100317971 | Fan et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20110040190 | Jahnke et al. | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110054315 | Roberts et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110054363 | Cain et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110112400 | Emery et al. | May 2011 | A1 |
20110118602 | Weng et al. | May 2011 | A1 |
20110172529 | Gertner | Jul 2011 | A1 |
20110178444 | Slayton et al. | Jul 2011 | A1 |
20110251528 | Canney et al. | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20110257524 | Gertner | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20110263967 | Bailey et al. | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20120010541 | Cain et al. | Jan 2012 | A1 |
20120029353 | Slayton et al. | Feb 2012 | A1 |
20120059264 | Hope Simpson et al. | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120059285 | Soltani et al. | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120092724 | Pettis | Apr 2012 | A1 |
20120130288 | Holland et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
20120172720 | Kawabata | Jul 2012 | A1 |
20120189998 | Kruecker et al. | Jul 2012 | A1 |
20120232388 | Curra et al. | Sep 2012 | A1 |
20120259250 | Sapozhnikov et al. | Oct 2012 | A1 |
20120271167 | Holland et al. | Oct 2012 | A1 |
20120271223 | Khanna | Oct 2012 | A1 |
20130041293 | Cain | Feb 2013 | A1 |
20130053691 | Kawabata et al. | Feb 2013 | A1 |
20130090579 | Cain et al. | Apr 2013 | A1 |
20130102932 | Cain et al. | Apr 2013 | A1 |
20130190623 | Bertolina et al. | Jul 2013 | A1 |
20130269982 | Teofilovic | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20130289593 | Hall et al. | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20130303906 | Cain et al. | Nov 2013 | A1 |
20140058293 | Hynynen et al. | Feb 2014 | A1 |
20140073995 | Teofilovic et al. | Mar 2014 | A1 |
20140100459 | Xu et al. | Apr 2014 | A1 |
20140128734 | Genstler et al. | May 2014 | A1 |
20150375015 | Cain | Dec 2015 | A1 |
20160135916 | Rakic et al. | May 2016 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
102481164 | May 2012 | CN |
3220751 | Dec 1933 | DE |
3544628 | Jun 1987 | DE |
3817094 | Nov 1989 | DE |
4012760 | May 1992 | DE |
0017382 | Oct 1980 | EP |
0320303 | Jun 1989 | EP |
0332871 | Sep 1989 | EP |
0384831 | Aug 1990 | EP |
0755653 | Jan 1997 | EP |
1374785 | Jan 2004 | EP |
1504713 | Feb 2005 | EP |
2397188 | Dec 2011 | EP |
2099582 | Dec 1982 | GB |
60-80779 | May 1985 | JP |
61-196718 | Aug 1986 | JP |
HEI 2-215451 | Aug 1990 | JP |
HEI 6-197907 | Jul 1994 | JP |
HEI 7504339 | May 1995 | JP |
08-84740 | Apr 1996 | JP |
06-304178 | May 1996 | JP |
08-131454 | May 1996 | JP |
09-55571 | Feb 1997 | JP |
HEI 10-512477 | Dec 1998 | JP |
2000300559 | Oct 2000 | JP |
2003-510159 | Mar 2003 | JP |
2004-505660 | Feb 2004 | JP |
2005167058 | Jun 2005 | JP |
2007520307 | Jul 2007 | JP |
2010019554 | Jan 2010 | JP |
2010029650 | Feb 2010 | JP |
2010204068 | Sep 2010 | JP |
2004-512502 | Apr 2014 | JP |
WO 9406355 | Mar 1994 | WO |
WO 0232506 | Apr 2002 | WO |
WO2005018469 | Mar 2005 | WO |
WO 2008051484 | May 2008 | WO |
WO2011040054 | Jul 2011 | WO |
WO 2011092683 | Aug 2011 | WO |
WO2011154654 | Dec 2011 | WO |
WO2015000953 | Jan 2015 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Maxwell et al., Cavitation clouds created by shock scattering from bubbles during histotripsy, Oct. 2011, J. Acoust. Soc. Am., vol. 130, No. 4, pp. 1888-1898. |
Avtech; AVR-8 Data sheet; May 23, 2004; 3 pages; retrieved from the internet (http//www.avtechpulse.com). |
Lin et al.; U.S. Appl. No. 14/656,633 entitled “Frequency compounding ultrasound pulses for imaging and therapy,” filed Mar. 12, 2015. |
Lin et al; Dual-beam histotripsy: a low-frequency pump enabling a high-frequency probe for precise lesion formation; IEEE Trans. Ultrason. Ferroelectr. Control; 61(2); pp. 325-340; Feb. 2014; (Author Manuscript; 29 pages). |
Jahnke et al.; U.S. Appl. No. 14/746,692 entitled “Disposable acoustic coupling medium container,” filed Jun. 22, 2015. |
Akiyama et al.; Elliptically curved acoustic lens for emitting strongly focused finite-amplitude beams: Application of the spheroidal beam equation model to the theoretical prediction; Acoustical Science and Technology, vol. 26, pp. 279-284, May 2005. |
Appel et al.; Stereoscopic highspeed recording of bubble filaments; Ultrasonics Sonochemistry; vol. 11(1); pp. 39-42; Jan. 2004. |
Aschoff et al.; How does alteration of hepatic blood flow affect liver perfusion and radiofrequency-induced thermal lesion size in rabbit liver?; J Magn Reson Imaging; 13(1); pp. 57-63; Jan. 2001. |
Atchley et al.; Thresholds for cavitation produced in water by pulsed ultrasound; Ultrasonics.⋅, vol. 26(5); pp. 280-285; Sep. 1988. |
Avago Technologies; ACNV2601 High Insulation Voltage 10 MBd Digital Opotcoupler. Avago Technologies Data Sheet; pp. 1-11; Jul. 29, 2010. |
Bjoerk et al.; Cool/MOS CP—How to make most beneficial use of the generation of super junction technology devices. lnfineon Technologies AG. Feb. 2007 [retrieved Feb. 4, 2014] from the internet (http://www.infineon.com/dgdl/Infineon+-+Application+Note+-+PowerMOSFETs+-+600V+CoolMOS%E284%A2+-+CP+Most+beneficial+use+of+superjunction+technologie+devices.pdf?folderId=db3a304412b407950112b408e8c90004&fileId=db3a304412b407950112b40ac9a40688>pp. 1, 4, 14. |
Bland et al.; Surgical Oncology; McGraw Hill; Chap. 5 (Cavitron Ultrasonic Aspirator); pp. 461-462; Jan. 29, 2001. |
Burdin et al.; Implementation of the laser diffraction technique for cavitation bubble investigations; Particle & Particle Systems Characterization; vol. 19; pp. 73-83; May 2002. |
Cain, Charles A.; Histotripsy: controlled mechanical sub-division of soft tissues by high intensity pulsed ultrasound (conference presentation); American Institute of Physics (AIP) Therapeutic Ultrasound: 5th International Symposium on Therapeutic Ultrasound; 44 pgs.; Oct. 27-29, 2005. |
Canney et al.; Shock-Induced Heating and Millisecond Boiling in Gels and Tissue Due to High Intensity Focused Ultrasound; Ultrasound in Medicine & Biology, vol. 36, pp. 250-267; Feb. 2010 (author manuscript). |
Chan et al.; An image-guided high intensity focused ultrasound device for uterine fibroids treatment; Medical Physics, vol. 29, pp. 2611-2620, Nov. 2002. |
Clasen et al.; MR-guided radiofrequency ablation of hepatocellular carcinoma: Long-term effectiveness; J Vase Intery Radiol; 22(6); pp. 762-770; Jun. 2011. |
Clement et al.; A hemisphere array for non-invasive ultrasound brain therapy and surgery; Physics in Medicine and Biology, vol. 45, p. 3707-3719, Dec. 2000. |
Cline et al.; Magnetic resonance-guided thermal surgery; Magnetic Resonance in Medicine; 30(1); pp. 98-106; Jul. 1993. |
Curiel et al.; Elastography for the follow-up of high-intensity focused ultrasound prostate cancer treatment: Initial comparison with MRI; Ultrasound Med. Biol; 31(11); pp. 1461-1468; Nov. 2005. |
Desilets et al.; The Design of Efficient Broad-Band Piezoelectric Transducers; Sonics and Ultrasonics, IEEE Transactions on, vol. 25, pp. 115-125, May 1978. |
Emelianov et al.; Triplex ultrasound: Elasticity imaging to age deep venous thrombosis; Ultrasound Med Biol; 28(6); pp. 757-767; Jun. 2002. |
Giannatsis et al.; Additive fabrication technologies applied to medicine and health care: a review; The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology; 40(1-2); pp. 116-127; Jan. 2009. |
Gudra et al.; Influence of acoustic impedance of multilayer acoustic systems on the transfer function of ultrasonic airborne transducers; Ultrasonics, vol. 40, pp. 457-463, May 2002. |
Hall et al.; A Low Cost Compact 512 Channel Therapeutic Ultrasound System for Transcutaneous Ultrasound Surgery; AIP Conference Proceedings, Boston, MA; vol. 829, pp. 445-449, Oct. 27-29, 2005. |
Hall et al.; Acoustic Access to the Prostate for Extracorporeal Ultrasound Ablation; Journal of Endourology, vol. 24, pp. 1875-1881, Nov. 2010. |
Hall et al.; Histotripsy of the prostate: dose effects in a chronic canine model; Urology; 74(4); pp. 932-937; Oct. 2009 (author manuscript). |
Hall et al.; Imaging feedback of tissue liquefaction (histotripsy) in ultrasound surgery; IEEE Ultrasonic Symposium, Sep. 18-21, 2005, pp. 1732-1734. |
Hartmann; Ultrasonic properties of poly(4-methyl pentene-1), Journal of Applied Physics, vol. 51, pp. 310-314, Jan. 1980. |
Holland et al.; Thresholds for transient cavitation produced by pulsed ultrasound in a controlled nuclei environment; J. Acoust. Soc. Am.; vol. 88(5); pp. 2059-2069; Nov. 1990. |
Huber et al.; Influence of shock wave pressure amplitude and pulse repetition frequency on the lifespan, size and number of transient cavities in the field of an electromagnetic lithotripter; Physics in Medicine and Biology; vol. 43 (10); pp. 3113-3128; Oct. 1998. |
Hynynen et al.; Tissue thermometry during ultrasound exposure; European Urology; 23(Suppl 1); pp. 12-16; 1993 (year of pub. sufficiently earlier than effective US filing date and any foreign priority date). |
Kallel et al.; The feasibility of elastographic visualization of HIFU-induced thermal lesions in soft tissues: Image-guided high-intensity focused ultrasound; Ultrasound Med. Biol; 25(4); pp. 641-647; May 1999. |
Kim et al.; Dependence of particle volume fraction on sound velocity and attenuation of EPDM composites; Ultrasonics, vol. 46, pp. 177-183, Feb. 2007. |
Konofagou; Quo vadis elasticity imaging?; Ultrasonics; 42(1-9); pp. 331-336; Apr. 2004. |
Krimholtz et al.; New equivalent circuits for elementary piezoelectric transducers; Electronics Letters, vol. 6, pp. 398-399, Jun. 1970. |
Kruse et al.; Tissue characterization using magnetic resonance elastography: Preliminary results; Phys. Med. Biol; 45(6); pp. 1579-1590; Jun. 2000. |
Lake et al.; Histotripsy: minimally invasive technology for prostatic tissue ablation in an in vivo canine model; Urology; 72(3); pp. 682-686; Sep. 2008. |
Lauterborn et al.; Cavitation bubble dynamics studied by high speed photography and holography: part one; Ultrasonics; vol. 23; pp. 260-268; Nov. 1985. |
Lensing et al.; Deep-vein thrombosis; The Lancet, vol. 353, pp. 479-485, Feb. 6, 1999. |
Liu et al.; Real-time 2-D temperature imaging using ultrasound; IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 57(1); pp. 12-16; Jan. 2010 (author manuscript, 16 pgs.). |
Liu et al.; Viscoelastic property measurement in thin tissue constructs using ultrasound; IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control; 55(2); pp. 368-383; Feb. 2008 (author manuscript, 37 pgs.). |
Manes et al.; Design of a Simplified Delay System for Ultrasound Phased Array Imaging; Sonics and Ultrasonics, IEEE Transactions on, vol. 30, pp. 350-354, Nov. 1983. |
Maréchal et al; Effect of Radial Displacement of Lens on Response of Focused Ultrasonic Transducer; Japanese Journal of Applied Physics, vol. 46, p. 3077-3085; May 15, 2007. |
Maréchal et al; Lens-focused transducer modeling using an extended KLM model; Ultrasonics, vol. 46, pp. 155-167, May 2007. |
Martin et al.; Water-cooled, high-intensity ultrasound surgical applicators with frequency tracking; Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control, IEEE Transactions on, vol. 50, pp. 1305-1317, Oct. 2003. |
Maxwell et al.; Noninvasive Thrombolysis Using Pulsed Ultrasound Cavitation Therapy Histotripsy; Ultrasound in Medicine & Biology, vol. 35, pp. 1982-1994, Dec. 2009 (author manuscript). |
Maxwell; Noninvasive thrombolysis using histotripsy pulsed ultrasound cavitation therapy; PhD Dissertation. University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan. Jun. 2012. |
Miller et al.; A review of in vitro bioeffects of inertial ultrasonic cavitation from a mechanistic perspective; Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology; vol. 22; pp. 1131-1154; (year of publication is sufficiently earlier than the effective U.S. filing date and any foreign priority date) 1996. |
Nightingale et al.; Analysis of contrast in images generated with transient acoustic radiation force; Ultrasound Med Biol; 32(1); pp. 61-72; Jan. 2006. |
Ohl et al.; Bubble dynamics, shock waves and sonoluminescence; Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. A; vol. 357; pp. 269-294; (year of publication is sufficiently earlier than the effective U.S. filing date and any foreign priority date) 1999. |
Okada et al.; A case of hepatocellular carcinoma treated by MR-guided focused ultrasound ablation with respiratory gating; Magn Reson Med Sci; 5(3); pp. 167-171; Oct. 2006. |
Palmeri et al.; Acoustic radiation force-based elasticity imaging methods; Interface Focus; 1; pp. 553-564; Aug. 2011. |
Parsons et al.; Cost-effective assembly of a basic fiber-optic hydrophone for measurement of high-amplitude therapeutic ultrasound fields; The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, vol. 119, pp. 1432-1440, Mar. 2006. |
Parsons et al.; Pulsed cavitational ultrasound therapy for controlled tissue homogenization; Ultrasound in Med. & Biol.; vol. 32(1); pp. 115-129; Jan. 2006. |
Pishchalnikov et al.; Cavitation Bubble Cluster Activity in the Breakage of Kidney Stones by Lithotripter Shock Waves; J Endourol.; 17(7): 435-446; Sep. 2003. |
Porter et al.; Reduction in left ventricular cavitary attenuation and improvement in posterior myocardial contrast . . . ; J Am Soc Echocardiography; pp. 437-441; Jul.-Aug. 1996. |
Roberts et al.; Pulsed cavitational ultrasound: a noninvasive technology for controlled tissue ablation (histotripsy) in the rabbit kidney; Journal of Urology; vol. 175(2); pp. 734-738; Feb. 2006. |
Rosenschein et al.; Ultrasound Imaging-Guided Noninvasive Ultrasound Thrombolysis: Preclinical Results; Circulation; vol. 102; pp. 238-245, Jul. 11, 2000. |
Rowland et al.; MRI study of hepatic tumours following high intensity focused ultrasound surgery; British Journal of Radiology; 70; pp. 144-153; Feb. 1997. |
Roy et al.; A precise technique for the measurement of acoustic cavitation thresholds and some preliminary results; Journal of the Acoustical Society of America; vol. 78(5); pp. 1799-1805; Nov. 1985. |
Sapareto et al.; Thermal dose determination in cancer therapy; Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 10(6); pp. 787-800; Apr. 1984. |
Sapozhnikov et al.; Ultrasound-Guided Localized Detection of Cavitation During Lithotripsy in Pig Kidney in Vivo; IEEE Ultrasonics Symposium, vol. 2; pp. 1347-1350; Oct. 7-10, 2001. |
Sato et al.; Experimental Investigation of Phased Array Using Tapered Matching Layers. 2002 IEEE Ultrasound Symposium. vol. 2; pp. 1235-1238, Oct. 2002. |
Simonin et al.; Characterization of heterogeneous structure in a polymer object manufactured by stereolithography with low-frequency microechography; Journal of Materials Chemistry; vol. 6, pp. 1595-1599, Sep. 1996. |
Sokolov et al.; Use of a dual-pulse lithotripter to generate a localized and intensified cavitation field; Journal of the Acoustical Society of America; vol. 110(3); pp. 1685-1695; Sep. 2001. |
Song et al.; Feasibility of Using Lateral Mode Coupling Method for a Large Scale Ultrasound Phased Array for Noninvasive Transcranial Therapy; Biomedical Engineering; IEEE Transactions on, vol. 57, pp. 124-133; Jan. 2010 (author manuscript). |
Souchon et al.; Visualisation of HIFU lesions using elastography of the human prostate in vivo: Preliminary results; Ultrasound Med. Biol; 29(7); pp. 1007-1015; Jul. 2003. |
Souquet et al.; Design of Low-Loss Wide-Band Ultrasonic Transducers for Noninvasive Medical Application; Sonics and Ultrasonics, IEEE Transactions on, vol. 26, pp. 75-80, Mar. 1979. |
Therapeutic Ultrasound Group. Non-invasive Ultrasonic Tissue Fraction for Treatment of Benign Disease and Cancer—“Histotripsy”. University research [online]. Biomedical Engineering Department, University of Michigan. Jul. 2011[retrieved on Jan. 28, 2014] from: (http://web.archive.org/web/20110720091822/http://www.histotripsy.umich.edu/index.html>.entiredocument). |
Toda; Narrowband impedance matching layer for high efficiency thickness mode ultrasonic transducers; Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control, IEEE Transactions on, vol. 49, pp. 299-306, Mar. 2002. |
Van Kervel et al.; A calculation scheme for the optimum design of ultrasonic transducers; Ultrasonics, vol. 21, pp. 134-140, May 1983. |
Wang et al.; Quantitative ultrasound backscatter for pulsed cavitational ultrasound therapy-histotripsy; Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control, IEEE Transactions on, vol. 56, pp. 995-1005, May 2009 (author manuscript). |
Xie et al.; Correspondence of ultrasound elasticity imaging to direct mechanical measurement in aging DVT in rats; Ultrasound Med Biol; 31(10); pp. 1351-1359; Oct. 2005 (author manuscript, 20 pgs.). |
Xu et al.; A new strategy to enhance cavitational tissue erosion by using a high intensity initiating sequence; IEEE Trans Ultrasonics Ferroelectrics and Freq Control; vol. 53(8); pp. 1412-1424; Aug. 2006. |
Xu et al.; Controlled ultrasound tissue erosion: the role of dynamic interaction between insonation and microbubble activity; Journal of the Acoustical Society of America; vol. 117(1); pp. 424-435; Jan. 2005. |
Xu et al.; Controlled ultrasound tissue erosion; IEEE Transaction on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics, and Frequency Control; vol. 51 (6); pp. 726-736; Jun. 2004. |
Xu et al.; Effects of acoustic parameters on bubble cloud dynamics in ultrasound tissue erosion (histotripsy); Journal of the Acoustical Society of America; vol. 122(1); pp. 229-236; Jul. 2007. |
Xu et al.; High Speed Imaging of Bubble Clouds Generated in Pulsed Ultrasound Cavitational Therapy Histotripsy; IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control; ; vol. 54; No. 10; pp. 2091R2101; Oct. 2007. |
Xu et al.; Investigation of intensity threshold for ultrasound tissue erosion; Ultrasound in Med. & Biol.; vol. 31(12); pp. 1673-1682; Dec. 2005. |
Xu et al.; Optical and acoustic monitoring of bubble cloud dynamics at a tissue-fluid interface in ultrasound tissue erosion; Journal of the Acoustical Society of America; vol. 121(4); pp. 2421-2430; Apr. 2007. |
Yan et al.; A review of rapid prototyping technologies and systems; Computer-Aided Design, vol. 28, pp. 307-318, Apr. 1996. |
Zhang et al.; A fast tissue stiffness-dependent elastography for HIFU-induced lesions inspection; Ultrasonics; 51(8); pp. 857-869; Dec. 2011. |
Zheng et al.; An acoustic backscatter-based method for localization of lesions induced by high-intensity focused ultrasound; Ultrasound Med Biol; 36(4); pp. 610-622; Apr. 2010. |
Arani et al.; Transurethral prostate magnetic resonance elestography; prospective imaging requirements; Magn. Reson. Med.; 65(2); pp. 340-349; Feb. 2011. |
Avago Technologies; Avago's ACNV2601 optocoupler is an optically coupled logic gate; Data Sheet; 2 pages; Jul. 29, 2010. |
Billson et al.; Rapid prototyping technologies for ultrasonic beam focussing in NDE; IEEE International Ultrasonic Symposium Proceedings; pp. 2472-2472; Oct. 2011. |
Khokhlova et al.; Controlled tissue emulsification produced by high intensity focused ultrasound shock waves and millisecond boiling; J. Acoust. Soc. Am.; 130(5), pt. 2; pp. 3498-3510; Nov. 2011. |
Miller et al.; Investigation of the mechanism of ARFI-based color doppler feedback of histotripsy tissue fractionation; Ultrasonic Symposium (IUS); 2013 IEEE International; 4 pages; Jul. 21-25, 2013. |
Miller et al.; Real-time elastography-based monitoring of histotripsy tissue fractionation using color doppler; Ultrasonics Symposium (IUS); 2012 IEEE International; 8 pages; Oct. 7-10, 2012. |
Cain et al.; U.S. Appl. No. 14/911,273 entitled “Histotripsy using very short ultrasound pulses,” filed Feb. 10, 2016. |
Hobarth et al.; Color flow doppler sonography for extracorporal shock wave lithotripsy; Journal of Urology; 150(6); pp. 1768-1770; Dec. 1, 1993. |
Maxwell et al.; In-vivo study of non-invasive thrombolysis by histotripsy in a porcine model; IEEE international Ultrasonics Symposium; IEEE; p. 220-223; Sep. 20, 2009. |
Urban et al.; Measurement of prostate viscoelasticity using shearwave dispersion ultrasound vibrometry (SDUV): an in vitro study; IEEE International Ultrasonics Symposium Proceedings (IUS); pp. 1141-1144; Oct. 11, 2010. |
Wikipedia; Medical ultrasound; 15 pages; retrieved from the internet (https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Medical_utrasound&oldid=515340960) on Jan. 12, 2018. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20150011916 A1 | Jan 2015 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61842820 | Jul 2013 | US |