Histotripsy therapy systems and methods for the treatment of brain tissue

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 11135454
  • Patent Number
    11,135,454
  • Date Filed
    Thursday, June 23, 2016
    8 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, October 5, 2021
    3 years ago
Abstract
A histotripsy therapy system configured for the treatment of brain tissue is provided, which may include any number of features. In one embodiment, the system includes an ultrasound therapy transducer, a drainage catheter, and a plurality of piezoelectric sensors disposed in the drainage catheter. The ultrasound therapy is configured to transmit ultrasound pulses into the brain to generate cavitation that liquefies a target tissue in the brain. The drainage catheter is configured to detect the ultrasound pulses. An aberration correction algorithm can be executed by the system based on the ultrasound pulses measured by the drainage catheter to automatically correct for an aberration effect caused by the ultrasound pulses passing through a skullcap of the patient.
Description
INCORPORATION BY REFERENCE

All publications and patent applications mentioned in this specification are herein incorporated by reference to the same extent as if each individual publication or patent application was specifically and individually indicated to be incorporated by reference.


FIELD

This disclosure generally relates to treating tissue with cavitation created by ultrasound therapy. More specifically, this disclosure relates to treatment of brain tissue or disorders of the brain, such as intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) or brain tumors, with ultrasound therapy.


BACKGROUND

Histotripsy, or pulsed ultrasound cavitation therapy, is a technology where extremely short, intense bursts of acoustic energy induce controlled cavitation (microbubble formation) within the focal volume. The vigorous expansion and collapse of these microbubbles mechanically homogenizes cells and tissue structures within the focal volume. This is a very different end result than the coagulative necrosis characteristic of thermal ablation. To operate within a non-thermal, Histotripsy realm; it is necessary to deliver acoustic energy in the form of high amplitude acoustic pulses with low duty cycle.


Compared with conventional focused ultrasound technologies, Histotripsy has important advantages: 1) the destructive process at the focus is mechanical, not thermal; 2) bubble clouds appear bright on ultrasound imaging thereby confirming correct targeting and localization of treatment; 3) treated tissue appears darker (hypoechoic) on ultrasound imaging, so that the operator knows what has been treated; and 4) Histotripsy produces lesions in a controlled and precise manner. It is important to emphasize that unlike microwave, radiofrequency, or high-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU), Histotripsy is not a thermal modality.


The rupture of blood vessels in the brain can lead to bleeding and clotting (hematoma) inside the brain, termed as hemorrhagic stroke or intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH). ICH accounts for 10-15% of all strokes. Current mainstay treatment remains craniotomy, a highly invasive surgery to remove the clot, associated with severe damage to the brain neurological function.


Minimally invasive (MIS) stereotactic approaches have been investigated to drain the hematoma via a catheter and thrombolytic drug (tPA) over several days. However, there are severe complications associated with tPA, and the functional outcome for ICH survivors is not improved, likely due the long treatment time allowing neurological damage to develop.


Recent preclinical studies show that, using magnetic resonance guided focused ultrasound (MRgFUS) applied outside the skullcap, the clot in the brain can be liquefied without drugs and aspirated out with a needle. However, the MRgFUS treatment time is still not short enough to avoid neurological damage (up to 3 hours for 40 mL clot). It is highly costly due to the long MRI time required, and cannot treat clots within 2 cm distance from the skullcap.


A skullcap in the ultrasound pathway can cause significant attenuation and defocusing (aberration effect) of ultrasound signals passing through the skullcap. For aberration correction, MRgFUS uses a skullcap profile extracted from prior 3D CT scans of the patient brain. However, during MRgFUS treatment, as it is impossible to put the patient in the exact same position as the previous scan, MRI is needed to guide and monitor precise focusing through the skullcap. The process is complex and highly costly.


Furthermore, all the current methods are not effective for large hematoma (>40 mL). There is a clear unmet need for a better ICH therapy that can minimally invasively and rapidly reduce the hematoma in the brain without tPA, which will allow the ICH patients to recover without significant neurological damage.


SUMMARY OF THE DISCLOSURE

Histotripsy produces tissue fractionation through dense energetic bubble clouds generated by short, high-pressure, ultrasound pulses. When using pulses shorter than 2 cycles, the generation of these energetic bubble clouds only depends on where the peak negative pressure (P−) exceeds an intrinsic threshold for inducing cavitation in a medium (typically 26-30 MPa in soft tissue with high water content).


A method of transmitting ultrasound energy into a brain of a human patient is provided, comprising the steps of placing a drainage catheter within a target tissue in the brain of the human patient, positioning a focus of a plurality of transducer elements of a therapy transducer within the target tissue, transmitting ultrasound pulses from each of the plurality of transducer elements into the target tissue, detecting the ultrasound pulses with one or more piezoelectric sensors positioned on or in the drainage catheter, and adjusting the transmission of ultrasound pulses from the plurality of transducer elements with an aberration correction algorithm based on the detected ultrasound pulses to automatically correct for an aberration effect caused by the ultrasound pulses passing through a skullcap of the human patient.


In one embodiment, the target tissue comprises a clot or hemorrhage. In another embodiment, the target tissue comprises a brain tumor.


In another embodiment, the method further comprises forming a bubble cloud on the target tissue with the ultrasound pulses.


In some embodiments, the method further comprises liquefying the target tissue with the ultrasound pulses.


In another embodiment, the method comprises draining the liquefied target tissue from the brain with the drainage catheter.


In one embodiment, adjusting the transmission of ultrasound pulses from the plurality of transducer elements with the aberration correction algorithm based on the detected ultrasound pulses further comprises determining a propagation time for the ultrasound pulses to travel from each of the plurality of transducer elements of the therapy transducer to the one or more piezoelectric sensors, calculating a time delay of the propagation time between each of the plurality of transducer elements and a reference element of the therapy transducer, and adjusting the transmission of ultrasound pulses from the plurality of transducer elements based on the calculated time delays.


In one embodiment, the one or more piezoelectric sensors comprises first and second piezoelectric sensors. In this embodiment, adjusting the transmission of ultrasound pulses from the plurality of transducer elements with the aberration correction algorithm based on the detected ultrasound pulses further comprises determining a propagation time for the ultrasound pulses to travel from each of a plurality of transducer elements of the therapy transducer to the first and second piezoelectric sensors, calculating a distance between the first and second piezoelectric sensors using projections of the first and second piezoelectric sensors onto a ray from each of the plurality of transducer elements to a midpoint of the first and second piezoelectric sensors, calculating a travel direction and a time of travel of the ultrasound pulses from each of the plurality of transducer elements to the midpoint of the first and second piezoelectric sensors, calculating a stand-off distance between the focus and the midpoint for each of the plurality of transducer elements, and calculating a time delay of each of the plurality of transducer elements based on the distance between the first and second piezoelectric sensors, the midpoint, and the stand-off distance.


In one embodiment, the method comprises placing the one or more piezoelectric sensors within or adjacent to the focus. In another embodiment, the placing step further comprises advancing the drainage catheter through a hole of the therapy transducer.


In another embodiment, the method comprises electronically or mechanically steering the focus to fully liquefy the target tissue.


An ultrasound system configured to treat a target tissue in a brain of a human patient is also provided, comprising a pulse generator and an amplifier, an ultrasound therapy transducer coupled to the pulse generator and the amplifier and having a plurality of transducer elements configured to transmit ultrasound pulses through a skullcap of the human patient towards a focal point within the target tissue in the brain to generate cavitation, a drainage catheter comprising one or more piezoelectric sensors, the drainage catheter adapted to be placed within the brain near the focal point to measure the ultrasound pulses, an electronic controller coupled to the pulse generator, the amplifier, the ultrasound therapy transducer, and the piezoelectric sensors of the drainage catheter, the electronic controller being configured to control transmission of the ultrasound pulses and adjust the transmission of ultrasound pulses from each of the plurality of transducer elements by executing an aberration correction algorithm based on the ultrasound pulses detected by the drainage catheter to automatically correct for an aberration effect caused by the ultrasound pulses passing through the skullcap of the human patient.


In one embodiment, the ultrasound therapy transducer is configured to transmit histotripsy therapy pulses to generate cavitation to liquefy the target tissue within the brain of the human patient.


In another embodiment, the drainage catheter includes drainage ports configured to drain the liquefied target tissue from the human patient.


In some embodiments, the one or more piezoelectric sensors comprises exactly one piezoelectric sensor. In this embodiment, the aberration correction algorithm comprises determining a propagation time for the ultrasound pulses to travel from each of the plurality of transducer elements of the therapy transducer to piezoelectric sensor, calculating a time delay of the propagation time between each of the plurality of transducer elements and a reference element of the therapy transducer, and adjusting the transmission of ultrasound pulses from the plurality of transducer elements based on the calculated time delays.


In some embodiments, the one or more piezoelectric sensors comprises first and second piezoelectric sensors. In this embodiment the aberration correction algorithm comprises determining a propagation time for the ultrasound pulses to travel from each of the plurality of transducer elements of the therapy transducer to the first and second piezoelectric sensors, calculating a distance between the first and second piezoelectric sensors using projections of the first and second piezoelectric sensors onto a ray from each of the plurality of transducer elements to a midpoint of the first and second piezoelectric sensors, calculating a travel direction and a time of travel of the ultrasound pulses from each of the plurality of transducer elements to the midpoint of the first and second piezoelectric sensors, calculating a stand-off distance between the focus and the midpoint for each of the plurality of transducer elements, and calculating a time delay of each of the plurality of transducer elements based on the distance between the first and second piezoelectric sensors, the midpoint, and the stand-off distance.


In one embodiment, the therapy transducer comprises a hole through which the drainage catheter is configured to be advanced into the brain of the human patient.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

The novel features of the invention are set forth with particularity in the claims that follow. A better understanding of the features and advantages of the present invention will be obtained by reference to the following detailed description that sets forth illustrative embodiments, in which the principles of the invention are utilized, and the accompanying drawings of which:



FIG. 1 shows a Histotripsy therapy system.



FIG. 2 shows schematic of drainage catheter and the guidewire with miniature piezoelectric sensors.



FIG. 3 illustrates the ray tracing algorithm to correct aberration of ultrasound pulses propagating through the skullcap in order to achieve focusing of histotripsy therapy through the skullcap.



FIGS. 4-5 illustrate one embodiment and method for treating brain tissue with Histotripsy ultrasound therapy.





DETAILED DESCRIPTION

Histotripsy is a noninvasive, cavitation-based therapy that uses very short, high-pressure ultrasound pulses to generate a dense, energetic, lesion-producing bubble cloud. This Histotripsy treatment can create controlled tissue erosion when it is targeted at a fluid-tissue interface and well-demarcated tissue fractionation when it is targeted within bulk tissue. Additionally, Histotripsy has been shown to be capable of fragmenting model kidney stones using surface erosion that is mechanistically distinct from conventional shockwave lithotripsy (SWL). Histotripsy therapy can be guided and monitored using ultrasound B-mode imaging in real-time, since 1) the cavitating bubble cloud appears as a temporally changing hyperechoic region in B-mode imaging, allowing the treatment to be precisely targeted, and 2) the echogenicity of the targeted region decreases as the degree of tissue fractionation increases, which can be used as a way of monitoring lesion production (image feedback) in real-time.


Generally in Histotripsy treatments, ultrasound pulses with 1 or more acoustic cycles are applied, and the bubble cloud formation relies on the pressure release scattering of the positive shock fronts (sometimes exceeding 100 MPa, P+) from initially initiated, sparsely distributed bubbles (or a single bubble). This has been called the “shock scattering mechanism”. This mechanism depends on one (or a few sparsely distributed) bubble(s) initiated with the initial negative half cycle(s) of the pulse at the focus of the transducer. A cloud of microbubbles then forms due to the pressure release backscattering of the high peak positive shock fronts from these sparsely initiated bubbles. These back-scattered high-amplitude rarefactional waves exceed the intrinsic threshold thus producing a localized dense bubble cloud. Each of the following acoustic cycles then induces further cavitation by the backscattering from the bubble cloud surface, which grows towards the transducer. As a result, an elongated dense bubble cloud growing along the acoustic axis opposite the ultrasound propagation direction is observed with the shock scattering mechanism. This shock scattering process makes the bubble cloud generation not only dependent on the peak negative pressure, but also the number of acoustic cycles and the amplitudes of the positive shocks. Without these intense shock fronts developed by nonlinear propagation, no dense bubble clouds are generated when the peak negative half-cycles are below the intrinsic threshold.


When ultrasound pulses less than 2 cycles are applied, shock scattering can be minimized, and the generation of a dense bubble cloud depends on one or two negative half cycle(s) of the applied ultrasound pulses exceeding an “intrinsic threshold” of the medium (the “intrinsic threshold mechanism”). This threshold can be in the range of 26-30 MPa for soft tissues with high water content, such as tissues in the human body. Using this intrinsic threshold mechanism, the spatial extent of the lesion is well-defined and more predictable. With peak negative pressures (P−) not significantly higher than this threshold, sub-wavelength reproducible lesions as small as half of the −6 dB beamwidth of a transducer can be generated.


Histotripsy has the potential to overcome the drawbacks of conventional treatment of ICH to provide minimally invasive, rapid reduction of hematoma in the brain, without thrombolytic drugs and regardless the size of the hematoma. Systems and methods described herein transmit microsecond-length ultrasound pulses at high pressures to generate a dense cavitation cloud of microbubbles using pre-existing gas nuclei in the clot within the focal region. The rapid expansion and collapse of the microbubbles induces high strain and stress to adjacent cells to fractionate the cells to liquid-like acellular homogenate.


According to some embodiments, Histotripsy can be used treat brain tissue or disorders of the brain, such as ICH or brain tumors. In one embodiment, Histotripsy can be used to liquefy a clot or a brain tumor through a skullcap of a human patient, and the resulting liquid can then be drained via a drainage catheter, without the use of thrombolytic drugs or external agents. For example, Histotripsy can be used to liquefy in vitro clots of 40 mL through a human skullcap within 30 minutes, which is six-fold faster than MRgFUS. With parameter optimization, the treatment time can be shortened by more than an order of magnitude compared to MRgFUS. These optimized parameters can be used to treat clots larger than 40 mL and at locations within 2 cm to the skullcap. The systems and methods described herein enable rapid clot removal even for clots >40 mL, in a minimally invasive approach, and eliminate the need for thrombolytic drugs and MRI, thereby substantially improving ICH and brain tumor therapy.


According to embodiments described herein that use histotripsy for treating the brain, a catheter can be placed in a target tissue, such as a clot or tumor within the brain of a patient. One or more acoustic hydrophones or PZT sensors can be integrated to a guidewire placed inside the catheter, which can then be inserted into the target tissue in the brain to directly measure ultrasound signals from a histotripsy therapy transducer positioned outside the patient. The timing of pulse transmission from all elements of the histotripsy therapy transducer can be re-aligned to refocus through the skullcap by using the timing of the ultrasound signal received at the sensor from each element of histotripsy therapy transducer. The sensor(s) and associated aberration correction algorithm for transcranial histotripsy therapy described herein is novel and can provide a cost-effective and simplified device to guide and monitor transcranial histotripsy therapy without CT or MRI.



FIG. 1 illustrates a Histotripsy system configured to generate cavitation bubbles or bubble clouds in tissue according to the methods and embodiments described herein. A Histotripsy system and generator is configured to generate complex waveforms in order to support the ultrasound pulse sequences described herein. A simplified block diagram of system 100 is shown in FIG. 1. The main components of the system are: Computer/controller 102, USB to Serial Converter 104, FPGA (Field Programmable Gate Array) 108, High Voltage Controller and Power Supply 110, Amplifier 112, and Therapy Transducer 114, and Drainage Catheter 117.


All controls for the generator can be established using a “Histotripsy Service Tool” software that can run on the computer/controller 102 (e.g., a standard PC, laptop, tablet, or other electronic computing system) and communicates to the generator via a connector such as a wireless, USB, or serial communication 104. The controller 102 can include a non-transitory computer-readable storage medium configured to store a set of instructions capable of being executed by the controller.


The system 100 can be configured to receive multiple sets of different driving parameters and loop them, which give the ability to the user to create wide range of custom sequences where all parameters (pulse repetition frequency (PRF), voltage amplitude, number of cycles, number of pulses per set, frequency, transducer element channels enabled, and time delays) can be set differently for every pulse generated. Time delays between pulses can be specified by the PRF for a parameter set or by specifying them manually/individually on a pulse-by-pulse basis.


For overall voltage amplitude regulation, level of high voltage can be changed accordingly through the HV Controller 110. This method cannot be used for dynamic voltage amplitude changes between two pulses since it will take too long for all capacitors on the HV line to discharge. For dynamic voltage amplitude changes between pulses, PWM (pulse width modulation) can be used at the FPGA 108 where the duty cycle of the capacitor-charging pulse may be modulated in order to produce the desired pulse voltage and resultant pressure amplitude.


USB to Serial Converter


USB to Serial converter 104 can convert USB combination to serial in order to communicate from the PC or electronic controller to the FPGA. It should be understood that other converters (or none at all) may be used in embodiments where the connection between the generator and the controller is not a USB connection.


FPGA


The FPGA 108 receives the information from the PC or electronic controller 102 and it can generate the complex pulsing sequence that is required to drive the amplifier 112. The FPGA can run on 100 MHz clock since speed of pulsing is critical to be timed in at least 10 ns increments.


High Voltage Controller and Power Supply


The High Voltage Controller and Power Supply 110 determines the level of DC voltage that needs to be supplied to the amplifier circuitry in order to have an adequate voltage amplitude level at the output of the amplifier.


Amplifier


The Amplifier 112 receives pulses generated by the FPGA and is supplied with high voltage from High Voltage Controller and Power Supply. It generates high voltage amplitude pulses that are fed to the Therapy Transducer 114 through the matching network components which properly matches the impedance of the therapy transducer to the impedance of the amplifier. It can be necessary to use a large number of capacitors that can store enough energy to support peak current demand during the generation of high voltage amplitude pulses.


Therapy Transducer


The Therapy Transducer 114 can be a single element transducer, or a multi-element ultrasound therapy transducer comprising a plurality of transducer elements and configured to generate and deliver the ultrasound therapy pulses described herein into tissue or other mediums. In some embodiments, the multi-element ultrasound therapy transducer can generate ultrasound pulses in two or more frequencies. The active transducer elements of the Therapy Transducer can be piezoelectric transducer elements. In some embodiments, the transducer elements can be mounted to an acoustic lens with a common geometric focus.


In other embodiments, the transducer elements can comprise a phased array that is optimized with steering parameters to maximize treatment speed and locations for transcranial histotripsy clot liquefaction without overheating the skullcap. Overheating the skullcap is the major limitation to restrain the treatment speed and location for transcranial ultrasound therapy. Proposed parameter optimization will ensure a rapid brain tissue treatment and minimize the heating to the skullcap. In some embodiments, the therapy transducer can achieve brain tissue liquefaction rates greater than 1 mL/min, which is orders of magnitude faster than passive thrombolytic action.


The therapy transducer can be configured to generate cavitation through the skullcap with a single ultrasound pulse having one high negative pressure phase lasting approximately 1-4 is, where the peak negative pressure of the pulse directly exceeds the “intrinsic threshold” for cavitation of the medium (approximately 27 MPa for brain tissue such as clots). The focus of the therapy transducer can be electrically steered to other locations to cover a large treatment volume, and the treatment time can be shortened by more than an order of magnitude compared to other therapy modalities. In some embodiments, the focal steering rate can be kept below 1% duty cycle to avoid overheating the skullcap.


According to the systems and methods described herein, histotripsy brain therapy can be performed without real-time imaging. CT scan may be needed as part of the target tissue diagnosis but is performed prior to the treatment. Using prior CT scan and stereotactic approach, the drainage hydrophone can be placed inside the clot, and the precise position of the catheter tip with regard to the clot position is known. The focus from the histotripsy therapy transducer can then be steered to liquefy a large portion of the brain tissue, leaving a thin rim of the tissue to avoid damage to adjacent brain tissue.


Drainage Catheter



FIG. 2 is an expanded view of the drainage catheter 117 of the system, which can comprise a sheath portion 118 and a guidewire portion 120. The sheath portion can comprise a flexible material and can include one or more drainage ports 119 to facilitate the removal of bodily fluids or tissues through the catheter. The guidewire portion 120 can be insertable into the sheath portion 118 for steering the catheter to the target region in tissue. The drainage catheter can further include one or more piezoelectric (PZT) sensors 122 disposed along the guidewire portion 120. The embodiment of FIG. 2 shows 2 PZT sensors, but it should be understood that any number of PZT sensors can be implemented. For example, some embodiments utilize a single PZT sensor. The PZT sensors of the catheter can be configured to measure ultrasound pulse waveforms from individual elements of the therapy transducer 114 to extract time delays between waveforms transmitted by the therapy transducer. The time delays can then be used by the system for aberration correction.


In addition, the PZT sensors can also be used to monitor the initiation and maintenance of cavitation, which is an indication of successful histotripsy therapy and can be monitored as increased acoustic emission from the cavitation site. As the attenuation caused by the skullcap can vary across patients, such real-time cavitation detection can be used to identify the power needed to initiate cavitation for an individual patient.


Software and hardware can be configured to automatically control the pulse transmission from each element of the therapy transducer sequentially and to collect and store the signals from the PZT sensors. With only a few microseconds necessary to transmit a single pulse from one element at one time and ˜100 μs for the ultrasound to travel from the element to the hydrophone, the entire data acquisition can be accomplished rapidly within a second using the automatic package.


Histotripsy Service Tool and Electronic Controller


Histotripsy Service Tool is software that can be run on any PC or computing system (e.g., electronic controller) and may be used for controlling the system. The Histotripsy Service Tool can start/stop the therapy with the therapy transducer, set and read the level of high voltage, therapy parameters (PRF, number of cycles, duty ratio, channel enabled and delay, etc.), and set and read other service and maintenance related items. The Histotripsy Service tool and Electronic Controller can be configured to set/read working parameters, start/stop the therapy, etc. It can use internal flash memory or other electronic storage media to store all the parameters. The Histotripsy Service Tool and Electronic Controller can communicate to the FPGA 108 all driving parameters that are necessary to generate complex pulsing. They can also communicate using serial communication or other electronic communication to the high voltage controller and power supply 110 where it can set/read the proper level of driving voltage.


The Histotripsy Service Tool and the Electronic controller can be coupled to the therapy transducer and the PZT sensors of the drainage catheter to use feedback from the drainage catheter during transcranial Histotripsy therapy. When ultrasound pulses propagate through a human skullcap, an aberration effect results in the peak negative pressure of the ultrasound pulses being reduced. In some experiments, the aberration effect of the skullcap has been shown to reduce the peak negative pressure to approximately 20% or less of the free-field condition of the pulses.


In one embodiment, the PZT sensors of the drainage catheter can measure the ultrasound pulse signal from each transducer element of the therapy transducer, and the Histotripsy Service Tool and the Electronic control can use these measurements and execute and aberration correction algorithm to adjust the timing of electrical pulses to each transducer element to correct for the aberration effect. The software and hardware can then automatically control the pulse transmission from each element sequentially and collect and store the measured signals. With only a few microseconds necessary to transmit a single pulse from one element at one time and ˜100 μs for the ultrasound to travel from each element to the PZT sensors, the entire data acquisition can be accomplished within a second using the proposed automatic package.


An aberration correction algorithm based on ray-tracing is configured to process the measured signal from the PZT sensors to achieve precise focusing and electrical or mechanical focal steering of the therapy transducer through the skullcap. In the specific embodiment described below, the system can include two or more PZT sensors. The algorithm contains three steps, and is illustrated in FIG. 3. The steps are as follows: 1) Using the known locations of two or more PZT sensors within the catheter (H1, H2) and the emitting transducer element (TN) of the therapy transducer, a plane, ΠN, is defined onto which the travel direction of the rays are restricted. H1 and H2 are assumed to be far enough from TN that the emitted signals from each individual element are effectively traveling as plane waves. The propagation time (t1 and t2) for the ultrasound to travel from TN to H1 and H2 can be calculated based on the time period between the signal arrival at the PZT sensor and its transmission from the transducer element. Using Δt=t1−t2, the distance between dN1 and dN2 is calculated as dist(dN1−dN2)=ctissue*Δt, where dN1 and dN2 are the projections of H1 and H2 onto the ray from TN to the midpoint of the two sensors, Hmid. The travel direction θi and the time of travel of the wave from TN to Hmid can then be calculated. 2) Knowing θi, a plane orthogonal to this wave propagation, Πorth, can be defined and centered at the Hmid. Then assuming plane wave propagation, the requisite time delay of each transducer element can be calculated for a given focal location, fn, by calculating the stand-off distance, dx, between Πorth and fn, and plugging into the equation T(fn)=tmid+dx/ctissue·3) Based on the time delay calculated for all steering locations within the treatment volume, a steering pattern can be generated in the software. The software can be configured to control steering parameters as well as cavitation monitoring, and can incorporate the aberration correction algorithm to automatically collect and process the PZT sensor signals and generate adjusted steering patterns.


In one embodiment, and aberration correction algorithm based on time delays is used to achieve precise focusing and electrical or mechanical focal steering of the therapy transducer through the skullcap. In the specific embodiment described immediately below, a single PZT sensor can be used. According to this embodiment, the algorithm comprises determining a propagation time for the ultrasound pulses to travel from each of the plurality of transducer elements of the therapy transducer to the piezoelectric sensor, calculating a time delay of the propagation time between each of the plurality of transducer elements and a reference element of the therapy transducer, and adjusting the transmission of ultrasound pulses from the plurality of transducer elements based on the calculated time delays.


One limitation of ultrasound transcranial therapy is overheating to the skullcap. To address this issue, a number of strategies may be employed in addition to parameter optimization. The order in which certain elements are fired can be alternated to reduce the local heating caused by individual elements. Heat may also be reduced by using cold water as the ultrasound coupling medium to the skullcap.



FIGS. 4-5 illustrate one embodiment and method for treating brain tissue with Histotripsy ultrasound therapy. FIG. 4 illustrates a therapy transducer 114 positioned adjacent to a skullcap of a patient, and a drainage catheter 117 positioned partially inside the brain of the patient such that drainage ports of the catheter are positioned within or adjacent to a target tissue of the brain, such as a blood clot or a brain tumor. To obtain precise focusing and focal steering, the PZT sensors in the catheter can be placed close to the geometrical focus of the transducer. In one embodiment, the therapy transducer 114 can include a hole 123 to facilitate catheter insertion through the transducer array. A catheter holder can be screwed into the hole, with scale markings on the catheter, which allows the operator to know the precise position of the catheter tip based on the insertion position, angle, and distance.


First, referring to step 50 of FIG. 5 and also to FIG. 4, the drainage catheter 117 can be inserted through the skullcap of the patient and placed within or adjacent to the target tissue in the brain. Next, referring to step 52 of FIG. 5 and also to FIG. 4, a focus of the therapy transducer 114 can be positioned on the target tissue. The therapy transducer itself can be acoustically coupled to the skull of the patient. Next, referring to step 54 of FIG. 5, ultrasound pulses can be transmitted from the therapy transducer into the target tissue. At step 56 of FIG. 5, PZT sensors of the drainage catheter can detect or measure ultrasound pulses from the therapy transducer. Finally, at step 58 of FIG. 5, the software and electronic controller of the system can adjust timing of the ultrasound pulses with an aberration correction algorithm based on the measurements from the PZT sensors to correct for the aberration effect caused by the skullcap.


The ultrasound pulses can be configured to generate cavitation or bubble clouds within the target tissue of the brain to liquefy the target tissue. In some embodiments, the liquefied target tissue can be drained with the catheter. In further embodiments, the focus of the therapy transducer can be electronically or mechanically steered to fully liquefy the target tissue.


The examples and illustrations included herein show, by way of illustration and not of limitation, specific embodiments in which the subject matter may be practiced. As mentioned, other embodiments may be utilized and derived there from, such that structural and logical substitutions and changes may be made without departing from the scope of this disclosure. Such embodiments of the inventive subject matter may be referred to herein individually or collectively by the term “invention” merely for convenience and without intending to voluntarily limit the scope of this application to any single invention or inventive concept, if more than one is, in fact, disclosed. Thus, although specific embodiments have been illustrated and described herein, any arrangement calculated to achieve the same purpose may be substituted for the specific embodiments shown. This disclosure is intended to cover any and all adaptations or variations of various embodiments. Combinations of the above embodiments, and other embodiments not specifically described herein, will be apparent to those of skill in the art upon reviewing the above description.

Claims
  • 1. A method of transmitting ultrasound energy into a brain of a human patient, comprising the steps of: placing a drainage catheter within a target tissue in the brain of the human patient;positioning a focus of a plurality of transducer elements of a therapy transducer within the target tissue;transmitting ultrasound pulses from each of the plurality of transducer elements into the target tissue;detecting the ultrasound pulses with first and second piezoelectric sensors positioned on or in the drainage catheter; andadjusting the transmission of ultrasound pulses from the plurality of transducer elements with an aberration correction algorithm based on the detected ultrasound pulses to automatically correct for an aberration effect caused by the ultrasound pulses passing through a skullcap of the human patient, wherein the aberration correction algorithm further comprises:determining a propagation time for the ultrasound pulses to travel from each of a plurality of transducer elements of the therapy transducer to the first and second piezoelectric sensors;calculating a distance between each of the plurality of transducer elements of the therapy transducer and the first and second piezoelectric sensors using projections of the first and second piezoelectric sensors onto a ray from each of the plurality of transducer elements to a midpoint of the first and second piezoelectric sensors;calculating a travel direction and a time of travel of the ultrasound pulses from each of the plurality of transducer elements to the midpoint of the first and second piezoelectric sensors;calculating a stand-off distance between the focus and the midpoint for each of the plurality of transducer elements; andcalculating a time delay of each of the plurality of transducer elements based on the distance between the first and second piezoelectric sensors, the midpoint, and the stand-off distance.
  • 2. The method of claim 1, wherein the target tissue comprises a clot or hemorrhage.
  • 3. The method of claim 1, wherein the target tissue comprises a brain tumor.
  • 4. The method of claim 1, further comprising forming a bubble cloud on the target tissue with the ultrasound pulses.
  • 5. The method of claim 1, further comprising liquefying the target tissue with the ultrasound pulses.
  • 6. The method of claim 5, further comprising draining the liquefied target tissue from the brain with the drainage catheter.
  • 7. The method of claim 1, wherein adjusting the transmission of ultrasound pulses from the plurality of transducer elements with the aberration correction algorithm based on the detected ultrasound pulses further comprises: determining a propagation time for the ultrasound pulses to travel from each of the plurality of transducer elements of the therapy transducer to the one or more piezoelectric sensors;calculating a time delay of the propagation time between each of the plurality of transducer elements and a reference element of the therapy transducer; andadjusting the transmission of ultrasound pulses from the plurality of transducer elements based on the time delay for each of the plurality of transducer elements.
  • 8. The method of claim 1 further comprising placing the one or more piezoelectric sensors within or adjacent to the focus.
  • 9. The method of claim 1, wherein the placing step further comprises advancing the drainage catheter through a hole of the therapy transducer.
  • 10. The method of claim 5, further comprising electronically steering the focus to fully liquefy the target tissue.
  • 11. The method of claim 5, further comprising mechanically steering the focus to fully liquefy the target tissue.
  • 12. An ultrasound system configured to treat a target tissue in a brain of a human patient, comprising: a pulse generator and an amplifier;an ultrasound therapy transducer coupled to the pulse generator and having a plurality of transducer elements configured to transmit ultrasound pulses through a skullcap of the human patient towards a focal point within the target tissue in the brain to generate cavitation;a drainage catheter comprising first and second piezoelectric sensors, the drainage catheter adapted to be placed within the brain near the focal point to measure the ultrasound pulses;an electronic controller coupled to the pulse generator, the ultrasound therapy transducer, and the piezoelectric sensors of the drainage catheter, the electronic controller being configured to control transmission of the ultrasound pulses and adjust the transmission of ultrasound pulses from each of the plurality of transducer elements by executing an aberration correction algorithm based on the ultrasound pulses detected by the drainage catheter to automatically correct for an aberration effect caused by the ultrasound pulses passing through the skullcap of the human patient, wherein the aberration correction algorithm comprises:determining a propagation time for the ultrasound pulses to travel from each of the plurality of transducer elements of the therapy transducer to the first and second piezoelectric sensors;calculating a distance between each of the plurality of transducer elements of the therapy transducer and the first and second piezoelectric sensors using projections of the first and second piezoelectric sensors onto a ray from each of the plurality of transducer elements to a midpoint of the first and second piezoelectric sensors;calculating a travel direction and a time of travel of the ultrasound pulses from each of the plurality of transducer elements to the midpoint of the first and second piezoelectric sensors;calculating a stand-off distance between the focus and the midpoint for each of the plurality of transducer elements; andcalculating a time delay of each of the plurality of transducer elements based on the distance between the first and second piezoelectric sensors, the midpoint, and the stand-off distance.
  • 13. The ultrasound system of claim 12, wherein the ultrasound therapy transducer is configured to transmit histotripsy therapy pulses to generate cavitation to liquefy the target tissue within the brain of the human patient.
  • 14. The ultrasound system of claim 13, the drainage catheter including drainage ports configured to drain the liquefied target tissue from the human patient.
  • 15. The ultrasound system of claim 12, wherein the one or more piezoelectric sensors comprises exactly one piezoelectric sensor.
  • 16. The ultrasound system of claim 15, wherein the aberration correction algorithm comprises: determining a propagation time for the ultrasound pulses to travel from each of the plurality of transducer elements of the therapy transducer to piezoelectric sensor;calculating a time delay of the propagation time between each of the plurality of transducer elements and a reference element of the therapy transducer; andadjusting the transmission of ultrasound pulses from the plurality of transducer elements based on the time delay for each of the plurality of transducer elements.
  • 17. The ultrasound system of claim 12, wherein the therapy transducer comprises a hole through which the drainage catheter is configured to be advanced into the brain of the human patient.
CROSS REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS

This application claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 62/184,179, filed Jun. 24, 2015, titled “HISTOTRIPSY THERAPY SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR THE TREATMENT OF INTRACEREBRAL HEMORRHAGE”, which is incorporated by reference in its entirety.

GOVERNMENT LICENSE RIGHTS

This invention was made with government support under grant number NS093121 awarded by the National Institute of Health. The government has certain rights in the invention.

PCT Information
Filing Document Filing Date Country Kind
PCT/US2016/039020 6/23/2016 WO 00
Publishing Document Publishing Date Country Kind
WO2016/210133 12/29/2016 WO A
US Referenced Citations (446)
Number Name Date Kind
3243497 Kendall et al. Mar 1966 A
3679021 Goldberg et al. Jul 1972 A
3879699 Pepper Apr 1975 A
4016749 Wachter Apr 1977 A
4024501 Herring et al. May 1977 A
4051394 Tieden Sep 1977 A
4117446 Alais Sep 1978 A
4266747 Souder, Jr. et al. May 1981 A
4269174 Adair May 1981 A
4277367 Madsen et al. Jul 1981 A
4351038 Alais Sep 1982 A
4406153 Ophir et al. Sep 1983 A
4440025 Hayakawa et al. Apr 1984 A
4447031 Souder, Jr. et al. May 1984 A
4453408 Clayman Jun 1984 A
4483345 Miwa Nov 1984 A
4548374 Thompson et al. Oct 1985 A
4549533 Cain et al. Oct 1985 A
4550606 Drost Nov 1985 A
4551794 Sandell Nov 1985 A
4575330 Hull Mar 1986 A
4622972 Giebeler, Jr. Nov 1986 A
4625731 Quedens et al. Dec 1986 A
4641378 McConnell et al. Feb 1987 A
4669483 Hepp et al. Jun 1987 A
4689986 Carson et al. Sep 1987 A
4757820 Itoh Jul 1988 A
4791915 Barsotti et al. Dec 1988 A
4819621 Ueberle et al. Apr 1989 A
4829491 Saugeon et al. May 1989 A
4856107 Dory Aug 1989 A
4865042 Umemura et al. Sep 1989 A
4888746 Wurster et al. Dec 1989 A
4890267 Rudolph Dec 1989 A
4922917 Dory May 1990 A
4938217 Lele Jul 1990 A
4957099 Hassler Sep 1990 A
4973980 Howkins et al. Nov 1990 A
4984575 Uchiyama et al. Jan 1991 A
4991151 Dory Feb 1991 A
4995012 Dory Feb 1991 A
RE33590 Dory May 1991 E
5014686 Schafer May 1991 A
5065751 Wolf Nov 1991 A
5080101 Dory Jan 1992 A
5080102 Dory Jan 1992 A
5091893 Smith et al. Feb 1992 A
5092336 Fink Mar 1992 A
5097709 Masuzawa et al. Mar 1992 A
5111822 Dory May 1992 A
5143073 Dory Sep 1992 A
5143074 Dory Sep 1992 A
5150711 Dory Sep 1992 A
5158070 Dory Oct 1992 A
5158071 Umemura et al. Oct 1992 A
5163421 Bernstein et al. Nov 1992 A
5165412 Okazaki Nov 1992 A
5174294 Saito et al. Dec 1992 A
5209221 Riedlinger May 1993 A
5215680 D'Arrigo Jun 1993 A
5219401 Cathignol et al. Jun 1993 A
5222806 Roberts Jun 1993 A
5230340 Rhyne Jul 1993 A
5295484 Marcus et al. Mar 1994 A
5316000 Chapelon et al. May 1994 A
5354258 Dory Oct 1994 A
5380411 Schlief Jan 1995 A
5393296 Rattner Feb 1995 A
5409002 Pell Apr 1995 A
5431621 Dory Jul 1995 A
5435311 Umemura et al. Jul 1995 A
5443069 Schaetzle Aug 1995 A
5450305 Boys et al. Sep 1995 A
5469852 Nakamura et al. Nov 1995 A
5474071 Chapelon et al. Dec 1995 A
5474531 Carter Dec 1995 A
5490051 Messana Feb 1996 A
5501655 Rolt et al. Mar 1996 A
5520188 Hennige et al. May 1996 A
5523058 Umemura et al. Jun 1996 A
5524620 Rosenschein Jun 1996 A
5540909 Schutt Jul 1996 A
5542935 Unger et al. Aug 1996 A
5558092 Unger et al. Sep 1996 A
5563346 Bartelt et al. Oct 1996 A
5566675 Li et al. Oct 1996 A
5573497 Chapelon Nov 1996 A
5580575 Unger et al. Dec 1996 A
5582578 Zhong et al. Dec 1996 A
5590657 Cain et al. Jan 1997 A
5601526 Chapelon et al. Feb 1997 A
5617862 Cole et al. Apr 1997 A
5648098 Porter Jul 1997 A
5666954 Chapelon et al. Sep 1997 A
5676452 Scholz Oct 1997 A
5676692 Sanghvi et al. Oct 1997 A
5678554 Hossack et al. Oct 1997 A
5694936 Fujimoto et al. Dec 1997 A
5695460 Siegel et al. Dec 1997 A
5717657 Ruffa Feb 1998 A
5724972 Petrofsky Mar 1998 A
5743863 Chapelon Apr 1998 A
5753929 Bliss May 1998 A
5759162 Oppelt et al. Jun 1998 A
5766138 Rattner Jun 1998 A
5769790 Watkins et al. Jun 1998 A
5797848 Marian et al. Aug 1998 A
5820623 Ng Oct 1998 A
5823962 Schaetzle et al. Oct 1998 A
5827204 Grandia et al. Oct 1998 A
5836896 Rosenschein Nov 1998 A
5849727 Porter et al. Dec 1998 A
5873902 Sanghvi et al. Feb 1999 A
5879314 Peterson et al. Mar 1999 A
5932807 Mallart Aug 1999 A
5947904 Hossack et al. Sep 1999 A
6001069 Tachibana et al. Dec 1999 A
6022309 Celliers et al. Feb 2000 A
6036667 Manna et al. Mar 2000 A
6088613 Unger Jul 2000 A
6093883 Sanghvi et al. Jul 2000 A
6113558 Rosenschein et al. Sep 2000 A
6126607 Whitmore, III et al. Oct 2000 A
6128958 Cain Oct 2000 A
6143018 Beuthan et al. Nov 2000 A
6165144 Talish et al. Dec 2000 A
6176842 Tachibana et al. Jan 2001 B1
6296619 Brisken et al. Oct 2001 B1
6308585 Nilsson et al. Oct 2001 B1
6308710 Silva Oct 2001 B1
6309355 Cain et al. Oct 2001 B1
6318146 Madsen et al. Nov 2001 B1
6321109 Ben-Haim et al. Nov 2001 B2
6338566 Verdier Jan 2002 B1
6344489 Spears Feb 2002 B1
6391020 Kurtz et al. May 2002 B1
6413216 Cain et al. Jul 2002 B1
6419648 Vitek et al. Jul 2002 B1
6470204 Uzgiris et al. Oct 2002 B1
6488639 Ribault et al. Dec 2002 B1
6490469 Candy Dec 2002 B2
6500141 Irion et al. Dec 2002 B1
6506154 Ezion et al. Jan 2003 B1
6506171 Vitek et al. Jan 2003 B1
6508774 Acker et al. Jan 2003 B1
6511428 Azuma et al. Jan 2003 B1
6511444 Hynynen et al. Jan 2003 B2
6522142 Freundlich Feb 2003 B1
6524251 Rabiner et al. Feb 2003 B2
6536553 Scanlon Mar 2003 B1
6543272 Vitek Apr 2003 B1
6556750 Constantino et al. Apr 2003 B2
6559644 Froundlich et al. May 2003 B2
6576220 Unger Jun 2003 B2
6599288 Maguire et al. Jul 2003 B2
6607498 Eshel Aug 2003 B2
6612988 Maor et al. Sep 2003 B2
6613004 Vitek et al. Sep 2003 B1
6613005 Friedman et al. Sep 2003 B1
6626854 Friedman et al. Sep 2003 B2
6626855 Weng et al. Sep 2003 B1
6645162 Friedman et al. Nov 2003 B2
6648839 Manna et al. Nov 2003 B2
6666833 Friedman et al. Dec 2003 B1
6685640 Fry et al. Feb 2004 B1
6685657 Jones Feb 2004 B2
6705994 Vortman et al. Mar 2004 B2
6719449 Laugharn, Jr. et al. Apr 2004 B1
6719694 Weng et al. Apr 2004 B2
6735461 Vitek et al. May 2004 B2
6736814 Manna et al. May 2004 B2
6750463 Riley Jun 2004 B1
6770031 Hynynen et al. Aug 2004 B2
6775438 Gaedke et al. Aug 2004 B1
6788977 Fenn et al. Sep 2004 B2
6790180 Vitek Sep 2004 B2
6820160 Allman Nov 2004 B1
6852082 Strickberger et al. Feb 2005 B2
6869439 White et al. Mar 2005 B2
6890332 Truckai et al. May 2005 B2
6929609 Asafusa Aug 2005 B2
7004282 Manna et al. Feb 2006 B2
7059168 Hibi et al. Jun 2006 B2
7128711 Medan et al. Oct 2006 B2
7128719 Rosenberg Oct 2006 B2
7175596 Vitek et al. Feb 2007 B2
7196313 Quinones Mar 2007 B2
7223239 Schulze et al. May 2007 B2
7258674 Cribbs et al. Aug 2007 B2
7273458 Prausnitz et al. Sep 2007 B2
7273459 Desilets et al. Sep 2007 B2
7300414 Holland et al. Nov 2007 B1
7311679 Desilets et al. Dec 2007 B2
7331951 Eshel et al. Feb 2008 B2
7341569 Soltani et al. Mar 2008 B2
7347855 Eshel et al. Mar 2008 B2
7358226 Dayton et al. Apr 2008 B2
7359640 Onde et al. Apr 2008 B2
7367948 O'Donnell et al. May 2008 B2
7374551 Liang et al. May 2008 B2
7377900 Vitek et al. May 2008 B2
7429249 Winder et al. Sep 2008 B1
7431704 Babaev Oct 2008 B2
7442168 Novak et al. Oct 2008 B2
7462488 Madsen et al. Dec 2008 B2
7559905 Kagosaki et al. Jul 2009 B2
7656638 Laakso et al. Feb 2010 B2
7695437 Quistgaard et al. Apr 2010 B2
7714481 Sakai May 2010 B2
7771359 Adam Aug 2010 B2
7967763 Deem et al. Jun 2011 B2
8057408 Cain et al. Nov 2011 B2
8295912 Gertner Oct 2012 B2
8333115 Garvey et al. Dec 2012 B1
8337407 Quistgaard et al. Dec 2012 B2
8342467 Stachowski et al. Jan 2013 B2
8376970 Babaev Feb 2013 B2
8539813 Cain et al. Sep 2013 B2
8568339 Rybyanets Oct 2013 B2
8636664 Brannan Jan 2014 B2
8715187 Landberg Davis et al. May 2014 B2
8845537 Tanaka et al. Sep 2014 B2
8932239 Sokka et al. Jan 2015 B2
9028434 Tanaka May 2015 B2
9049783 Teofilovic Jun 2015 B2
9061131 Jahnke et al. Jun 2015 B2
9144694 Cain Sep 2015 B2
9220476 Coussios et al. Dec 2015 B2
9228730 Inbody Jan 2016 B1
9302124 Konofagou et al. Apr 2016 B2
9457201 Hoelscher et al. Oct 2016 B2
9526923 Jahnke et al. Dec 2016 B2
9636133 Hall et al. May 2017 B2
9642634 Cain et al. May 2017 B2
9763688 Stulen et al. Sep 2017 B2
9901753 Cain et al. Feb 2018 B2
10022107 Thornton et al. Jul 2018 B2
10046181 Barthe et al. Aug 2018 B2
10058352 Carvell et al. Aug 2018 B2
10130828 Vortman et al. Nov 2018 B2
10751015 Anderson et al. Aug 2020 B2
10751125 Levy et al. Aug 2020 B2
10791991 Burkett et al. Oct 2020 B2
10799209 Lahti et al. Oct 2020 B2
10806421 Keller Oct 2020 B2
10820813 Alpert Nov 2020 B2
10847264 Mansker et al. Nov 2020 B2
10849511 Tochterman et al. Dec 2020 B2
10869603 Millett et al. Dec 2020 B2
10869633 Burkett Dec 2020 B2
10869648 Hubbard et al. Dec 2020 B2
10874353 Assif Dec 2020 B2
10874409 Matsubara et al. Dec 2020 B2
10878586 Brokman et al. Dec 2020 B2
10888232 Anderson et al. Jan 2021 B2
10893808 Dorando Jan 2021 B2
10905394 Stigall et al. Feb 2021 B2
10912463 Davies et al. Feb 2021 B2
10925688 Millett et al. Feb 2021 B2
10927003 Millett et al. Feb 2021 B2
10932678 Burkett Mar 2021 B2
10939826 Glynn et al. Mar 2021 B2
10942022 Johansson et al. Mar 2021 B2
10973419 Corl Apr 2021 B2
10993618 Mansker et al. May 2021 B2
10993628 Tochterman May 2021 B2
10993694 Meyer et al. May 2021 B2
11000185 Stigall et al. May 2021 B2
11006840 Stigall May 2021 B2
11013491 Rice et al. May 2021 B2
11020087 Hoffman Jun 2021 B2
11020089 Corl Jun 2021 B2
11026591 Burkett et al. Jun 2021 B2
11040140 Unser et al. Jun 2021 B2
20010039420 Burbank et al. Nov 2001 A1
20010041163 Sugita et al. Nov 2001 A1
20020045890 Celliers et al. Apr 2002 A1
20020078964 Kovac et al. Jun 2002 A1
20020099356 Unger et al. Jul 2002 A1
20020145091 Talish et al. Oct 2002 A1
20030092982 Eppstein May 2003 A1
20030112922 Burdette et al. Jun 2003 A1
20030149352 Liang et al. Aug 2003 A1
20030157025 Unger et al. Aug 2003 A1
20030169591 Cochran Sep 2003 A1
20030181833 Faragalla et al. Sep 2003 A1
20030199857 Eizenhofer Oct 2003 A1
20030221561 Milo Dec 2003 A1
20030236539 Rabiner et al. Dec 2003 A1
20040127815 Marchitto et al. Jul 2004 A1
20040138563 Moehring et al. Jul 2004 A1
20040162571 Rabiner et al. Aug 2004 A1
20040236248 Svedman Nov 2004 A1
20040243021 Murphy et al. Dec 2004 A1
20040260214 Echt et al. Dec 2004 A1
20050020945 Tosaya et al. Jan 2005 A1
20050038339 Chauhan et al. Feb 2005 A1
20050038361 Zhong et al. Feb 2005 A1
20050152561 Spencer Jul 2005 A1
20050154314 Quistgaard Jul 2005 A1
20050154431 Quistgaard et al. Jul 2005 A1
20050234438 Mast et al. Oct 2005 A1
20050283098 Conston et al. Dec 2005 A1
20060060991 Holsteyns et al. Mar 2006 A1
20060074303 Chornenky et al. Apr 2006 A1
20060173387 Hansmann et al. Aug 2006 A1
20060206028 Lee et al. Sep 2006 A1
20060241466 Ottoboni et al. Oct 2006 A1
20060241523 Sinelnikov et al. Oct 2006 A1
20060241533 Geller Oct 2006 A1
20060264760 Liu et al. Nov 2006 A1
20060293630 Manna et al. Dec 2006 A1
20070010805 Fedewa et al. Jan 2007 A1
20070016039 Vortman et al. Jan 2007 A1
20070044562 Sarr Mar 2007 A1
20070065420 Johnson Mar 2007 A1
20070083120 Cain et al. Apr 2007 A1
20070161902 Dan Jul 2007 A1
20070167764 Hynynen Jul 2007 A1
20070205785 Nilsson Sep 2007 A1
20070219448 Seip et al. Sep 2007 A1
20080013593 Kawabata Jan 2008 A1
20080033297 Sliwa Feb 2008 A1
20080033417 Nields et al. Feb 2008 A1
20080055003 Unnikrishnan et al. Mar 2008 A1
20080082026 Schmidt et al. Apr 2008 A1
20080091125 Owen et al. Apr 2008 A1
20080126665 Burr et al. May 2008 A1
20080177180 Azhari et al. Jul 2008 A1
20080194965 Sliwa et al. Aug 2008 A1
20080214964 Chapelon et al. Sep 2008 A1
20080262345 Fichtinger et al. Oct 2008 A1
20080262486 Zvuloni et al. Oct 2008 A1
20080312561 Chauhan Dec 2008 A1
20080319376 Wilcox et al. Dec 2008 A1
20090030339 Cheng et al. Jan 2009 A1
20090036773 Lau et al. Feb 2009 A1
20090112098 Vaezy et al. Apr 2009 A1
20090177085 Maxwell et al. Jul 2009 A1
20090198094 Fenster et al. Aug 2009 A1
20090211587 Lawrentschuk Aug 2009 A1
20090227874 Suri et al. Sep 2009 A1
20090230822 Kushculey et al. Sep 2009 A1
20090287083 Kushculey et al. Nov 2009 A1
20100011845 Laugharn et al. Jan 2010 A1
20100056924 Powers Mar 2010 A1
20100059264 Hasegawa et al. Mar 2010 A1
20100069797 Cain et al. Mar 2010 A1
20100125225 Gelbart et al. May 2010 A1
20100152624 Tanis et al. Jun 2010 A1
20100163694 Fadler et al. Jul 2010 A1
20100261994 Davalos et al. Oct 2010 A1
20100274136 Cerofolini Oct 2010 A1
20100286519 Lee et al. Nov 2010 A1
20100298744 Altshuler et al. Nov 2010 A1
20100305432 Duhay et al. Dec 2010 A1
20100317971 Fan et al. Dec 2010 A1
20100318002 Prus et al. Dec 2010 A1
20110054315 Roberts et al. Mar 2011 A1
20110112400 Emery et al. May 2011 A1
20110118602 Weng et al. May 2011 A1
20110144490 Davis et al. Jun 2011 A1
20110144545 Fan et al. Jun 2011 A1
20110172529 Gertner Jul 2011 A1
20110178444 Slayton et al. Jul 2011 A1
20110245671 Sato Oct 2011 A1
20110251528 Canney et al. Oct 2011 A1
20110257524 Gertner Oct 2011 A1
20110263967 Bailey et al. Oct 2011 A1
20110270136 Vitek Nov 2011 A1
20110319927 Nita Dec 2011 A1
20120029353 Slayton et al. Feb 2012 A1
20120029393 Lee Feb 2012 A1
20120059264 Hope Simpson et al. Mar 2012 A1
20120059285 Soltani et al. Mar 2012 A1
20120092724 Pettis Apr 2012 A1
20120130288 Holland et al. May 2012 A1
20120136279 Tanaka et al. May 2012 A1
20120158013 Stefanchik et al. Jun 2012 A1
20120172720 Asami et al. Jul 2012 A1
20120189998 Kruecker et al. Jul 2012 A1
20120215157 Berryman et al. Aug 2012 A1
20120232388 Curra et al. Sep 2012 A1
20120259250 Sapozhnikov et al. Oct 2012 A1
20120271167 Holland et al. Oct 2012 A1
20120271223 Khanna Oct 2012 A1
20130051178 Rybyanets Feb 2013 A1
20130053691 Kawabata et al. Feb 2013 A1
20130090579 Cain et al. Apr 2013 A1
20130102932 Cain et al. Apr 2013 A1
20130144165 Ebbini et al. Jun 2013 A1
20130190623 Bertolina et al. Jul 2013 A1
20130255426 Kassow et al. Oct 2013 A1
20130303906 Cain et al. Nov 2013 A1
20140058293 Hynynen et al. Feb 2014 A1
20140073995 Teofilovic et al. Mar 2014 A1
20140074076 Gertner Mar 2014 A1
20140088613 Seo et al. Mar 2014 A1
20140100459 Xu et al. Apr 2014 A1
20140128734 Genstler et al. May 2014 A1
20140200489 Behar et al. Jul 2014 A1
20140330124 Carol Nov 2014 A1
20140378832 Sanghvi et al. Dec 2014 A1
20150011916 Cannata et al. Jan 2015 A1
20150063668 You et al. Mar 2015 A1
20150151141 Arnal et al. Jun 2015 A1
20150190121 Slayton et al. Jul 2015 A1
20150258352 Lin et al. Sep 2015 A1
20150273246 Darlington et al. Oct 2015 A1
20150297177 Boctor et al. Oct 2015 A1
20150375015 Cain Dec 2015 A1
20160114194 Gertner Apr 2016 A1
20160135916 Rakic et al. May 2016 A1
20160151618 Powers et al. Jun 2016 A1
20160184614 Matula et al. Jun 2016 A1
20160184616 Cain et al. Jun 2016 A1
20160206341 Slayton Jul 2016 A1
20160206867 Hossack et al. Jul 2016 A1
20160287909 Maxwell et al. Oct 2016 A1
20160303166 Katz et al. Oct 2016 A1
20160339273 Al Mayiah Nov 2016 A1
20160354087 Noonan et al. Dec 2016 A1
20170000376 Partanen et al. Jan 2017 A1
20170049463 Popovic et al. Feb 2017 A1
20170071515 Chevillet et al. Mar 2017 A1
20170072227 Khokhlova et al. Mar 2017 A1
20170072228 Wang et al. Mar 2017 A1
20170100145 Khoklova et al. Apr 2017 A1
20170120080 Phillips et al. May 2017 A1
20170165046 Johnson Jun 2017 A1
20180064412 Messas et al. Mar 2018 A1
20180317884 Chapelon et al. Nov 2018 A1
20190216478 Maxwell et al. Jul 2019 A1
20190275353 Cannata et al. Sep 2019 A1
20200164231 Cannata et al. May 2020 A1
20200253550 Nair Aug 2020 A1
20200260964 Collins et al. Aug 2020 A1
20200330039 Burkett et al. Oct 2020 A1
20200330075 O'Reilly et al. Oct 2020 A1
20200346046 Cannata et al. Nov 2020 A1
20200367835 Anderson Nov 2020 A1
20200405259 Merritt Dec 2020 A1
20210000541 Levy et al. Jan 2021 A1
20210008394 Cain et al. Jan 2021 A1
20210022703 Nair Jan 2021 A1
20210161398 Millett et al. Jun 2021 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (88)
Number Date Country
1669672 Sep 2005 CN
1732031 Feb 2006 CN
201197744 Feb 2009 CN
102292123 Dec 2011 CN
102481164 May 2012 CN
102665585 Sep 2012 CN
103537016 Jan 2014 CN
103648361 Mar 2014 CN
103812477 May 2014 CN
104013444 Sep 2014 CN
104135938 Nov 2014 CN
106999053 Oct 2020 CN
107660137 Oct 2020 CN
106661535 Mar 2021 CN
106999054 May 2021 CN
106793997 Jun 2021 CN
107530049 Jun 2021 CN
3220751 Dec 1983 DE
3544628 Jun 1987 DE
3817094 Nov 1989 DE
4012760 May 1992 DE
0017382 Oct 1980 EP
0320303 Jun 1989 EP
0332871 Sep 1989 EP
0384831 Aug 1990 EP
0755653 Jan 1997 EP
1374785 Jan 2004 EP
1504713 Feb 2005 EP
2397188 Dec 2011 EP
2759003 Aug 2020 EP
3218629 Oct 2020 EP
3229688 Oct 2020 EP
2887989 Feb 2021 EP
3777689 Feb 2021 EP
2938253 Mar 2021 EP
3076864 Mar 2021 EP
2802276 Apr 2021 EP
2809221 Apr 2021 EP
2967369 May 2021 EP
2967488 Jun 2021 EP
3184048 Jun 2021 EP
2819552 Apr 2021 ES
2099582 Dec 1982 GB
254768 May 2021 IL
60-80779 May 1985 JP
61-196718 Aug 1986 JP
02-215451 Aug 1990 JP
H0422351 Jan 1992 JP
06-197907 Jul 1994 JP
07-504339 May 1995 JP
08-84740 Apr 1996 JP
06-304178 May 1996 JP
08-131454 May 1996 JP
09-55571 Feb 1997 JP
10-512477 Dec 1998 JP
2000300559 Oct 2000 JP
2003510159 Mar 2003 JP
2004505660 Feb 2004 JP
2004249106 Sep 2004 JP
2005167058 Jun 2005 JP
2006511265 Apr 2006 JP
2007144225 Jun 2007 JP
2007520307 Jul 2007 JP
2010019554 Jan 2010 JP
2010029650 Feb 2010 JP
2010204068 Sep 2010 JP
2013538097 Oct 2013 JP
2004512502 Apr 2014 JP
2015519970 Jul 2015 JP
2016508808 Mar 2016 JP
06785554 Oct 2020 JP
06789944 Nov 2020 JP
2020195788 Dec 2020 JP
6832958 Feb 2021 JP
6835719 Feb 2021 JP
6838057 Mar 2021 JP
6849592 Mar 2021 JP
6896719 Jun 2021 JP
WO9406355 Mar 1994 WO
WO0232506 Apr 2002 WO
WO2005018469 Mar 2005 WO
WO2008051484 May 2008 WO
WO2011040054 Jul 2011 WO
WO2011092683 Aug 2011 WO
WO2011154654 Dec 2011 WO
WO2014008594 Jan 2014 WO
WO2014071386 May 2014 WO
WO2015000953 Jan 2015 WO
Non-Patent Literature Citations (99)
Entry
Bak; Rapid protytyping or rapid production? 3D printing processes move industry towards the latter; Assembly Automation; 23(4); pp. 340-345; Dec. 1, 2003.
Shung; Diagnostic Ultrasound: Imaging and Blood Flow Measurements; Taylor and Francis Group, LLC; Boca Raton, FL; 207 pages; (year of pub. sufficiently earlier than effective US filing date and any foreign priority date) 2006.
Akiyama et al.; Elliptically curved acoustic lens for emitting strongly focused finite-amplitude beams: Application of the spheroidal beam equation model to the theoretical prediction; Acoustical Science and Technology, vol. 26, pp. 279-284, May 2005.
Appel et al.; Stereoscopic highspeed recording of bubble filaments; Ultrasonics Sonochemistry; vol. 11(1); pp. 39-42; Jan. 2004.
Arani et al.; Transurethral prostate magnetic resonance elestography; prospective imaging requirements; Magn. Reson. Med.; 65(2); pp. 340-349; Feb. 2011.
Aschoff et al.; How does alteration of hepatic blood flow affect liver perfusion and radiofrequency-induced thermal lesion size in rabbit liver?; J Magn Reson Imaging; 13(1); pp. 57-63; Jan. 2001.
Atchley et al.; Thresholds for cavitation produced in water by pulsed ultrasound; Ultrasonics.; vol. 26(5); pp. 280-285; Sep. 1988.
Avago Technologies; ACNV2601 High Insulation Voltage 10 MBd Digital Opotcoupler. Avago Technologies Data Sheet; pp. 1-11; Jul. 29, 2010.
Avago Technologies; Avago's ACNV2601 optocoupler is an optically coupled logic gate; Data Sheet; 2 pages; Jul. 29, 2010.
Avtech; AVR-8 Data sheet; May 23, 2004; 3 pages; retrieved from the internet (http//www.avtechpulse.com).
Billson et al.; Rapid prototyping technologies for ultrasonic beam focussing in NDE; IEEE International Ultrasonic Symposium Proceedings; pp. 2472-2474; Oct. 2011.
Bjoerk et al.; Cool/MOS CP—How to make most beneficial use of the generation of super junction technology devices. Infineon Technologies AG. [retrieved Feb. 4, 2014] from the internet (http://www.infineon.com/dgdl/Infineon+-+Application+Note+-+PowerMOSFETs+-+600V+CoolMOS%E284%A2+-+CP+Most+beneficial+use+of+superjunction+technologie+devices.pdf? folderId=db3a304412b407950112b408e8c90004&fileId=db3a304412b407950112b40ac9a40688>pages1,4.14; Feb. 2007.
Bland et al.; Surgical Oncology; McGraw Hill; Chap. 5 (Cavitron Ultrasonic Aspirator); pp. 461-462; Jan. 29, 2001.
Burdin et al.; Implementation of the laser diffraction technique for cavitation bubble investigations; Particle & Particle Systems Characterization; vol. 19; pp. 73-83; May 2002.
Cain, Charles A.; Histotripsy: controlled mechanical sub-division of soft tissues by high intensity pulsed ultrasound (conference presentation); American Institute of Physics (AIP) Therapeutic Ultrasound: 5th International Symposium on Therapeutic Ultrasound; 44 pgs.; Oct. 27-29, 2005.
Canney et al.; Shock-Induced Heating and Millisecond Boiling in Gels and Tissue Due to High Intensity Focused Ultrasound; Ultrasound in Medicine & Biology, vol. 36, pp. 250-267; Feb. 2010 (author manuscript).
Chan et al.; An image-guided high intensity focused ultrasound device for uterine fibroids treatment; Medical Physics, vol. 29, pp. 2611-2620, Nov. 2002.
Clasen et al.; MR-guided radiofrequency ablation of hepatocellular carcinoma: Long-term effectiveness; J Vase Interv Radiol; 22(6); pp. 762-770; Jun. 2011.
Clement et al.; A hemisphere array for non-invasive ultrasound brain therapy and surgery; Physics in Medicine and Biology, vol. 45, p. 3707-3719, Dec. 2000.
Cline et al.; Magnetic resonance-guided thermal surgery; Magnetic Resonance in Medicine; 30(1); pp. 98-106; Jul. 1993.
Curiel et al.; Elastography for the follow-up of high-intensity focused ultrasound prostate cancer treatment: Initial comparison with MRI; Ultrasound Med. Biol; 31(11); pp. 1461-1468; Nov. 2005.
Desilets et al.; The Design of Efficient Broad-Band Piezoelectric Transducers; Sonics and Ultrasonics, IEEE Transactions on, vol. 25, pp. 115-125, May 1978.
Emelianov et al.; Triplex ultrasound: Elasticity imaging to age deep venous thrombosis; Ultrasound Med Biol; 28(6); pp. 757-767; Jun. 2002.
Giannatsis et al.; Additive fabrication technologies applied to medicine and health care: a review; The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology; 40(1-2); pp. 116-127; Jan. 2009.
Gudra et al.; Influence of acoustic impedance of multilayer acoustic systems on the transfer function of ultrasonic airborne transducers; Ultrasonics, vol. 40, pp. 457-463, May 2002.
Hall et al.; A Low Cost Compact 512 Channel Therapeutic Ultrasound System for Transcutaneous Ultrasound Surgery; AIP Conference Proceedings, Boston, MA; vol. 829, pp. 445-449, Oct. 27-29, 2005.
Hall et al.; Acoustic Access to the Prostate for Extracorporeal Ultrasound Ablation; Journal of Endourology, vol. 24, pp. 1875-1881, Nov. 2010.
Hall et al.; Histotripsy of the prostate: dose effects in a chronic canine model; Urology; 74(4); pp. 932-937; Oct. 2009 (author manuscript).
Hall et al.; Imaging feedback of tissue liquefaction (histotripsy) in ultrasound surgery; IEEE Ultrasonic Symposium, Sep. 18-21, 2005, pp. 1732-1734.
Hartmann; Ultrasonic properties of poly(4-methyl pentene-1), Journal of Applied Physics, vol. 51, pp. 310-314, Jan. 1980.
Hobarth et al.; Color flow doppler sonography for extracorporal shock wave lithotripsy; Journal of Urology; 150(6); pp. 1768-1770; Dec. 1, 1993.
Holland et al.; Thresholds for transient cavitation produced by pulsed ultrasound in a controlled nuclei environment; J. Acoust. Soc. Am.; vol. 88(5); pp. 2059-2069; Nov. 1990.
Huber et al.; Influence of shock wave pressure amplitude and pulse repetition frequency on the lifespan, size and number of transient cavities in the field of an electromagnetic lithotripter; Physics in Medicine and Biology; vol. 43(10); pp. 3113-3128; Oct. 1998.
Hynynen et al.; Tissue thermometry during ultrasound exposure; European Urology; 23(Suppl 1); pp. 12-16; (year of pub. sufficiently earlier than effective US filing date and any foreign priority date)1993.
Kallel et al.; The feasibility of elastographic visualization of HIFU-induced thermal lesions in soft tissues: Image-guided high-intensity focused ultrasound; Ultrasound Med. Biol; 25(4); pp. 641-647; May 1999.
Khokhlova et al.; Controlled tissue emulsification produced by high intensity focused ultrasound shock waves and millisecond boiling; J. Acoust. Soc. Am.; 130(5), pt. 2; pp. 3498-3510; Nov. 2011.
Kim et al.; Dependence of particle volume fraction on sound velocity and attenuation of EPDM composites; Ultrasonics, vol. 46, pp. 177-183, Feb. 2007.
Konofagou; Quo vadis elasticity imaging?; Ultrasonics; 42(1-9); pp. 331-336; Apr. 2004.
Krimholtz et al.; New equivalent circuits for elementary piezoelectric transducers; Electronics Letters, vol. 6, pp. 398-399, Jun. 1970.
Kruse et al.; Tissue characterization using magnetic resonance elastography: Preliminary results; Phys. Med. Biol; 45(6); pp. 1579-1590; Jun. 2000.
Lake et al.; Histotripsy: minimally invasive technology for prostatic tissue ablation in an in vivo canine model; Urology; 72(3); pp. 682-686; Sep. 2008.
Lauterborn et al.; Cavitation bubble dynamics studied by high speed photography and holography: part one; Ultrasonics; vol. 23; pp. 260-268; Nov. 1985.
Lensing et al.; Deep-vein thrombosis; The Lancet, vol. 353, pp. 479-485, Feb. 6, 1999.
Lin et al; Dual-beam histotripsy: a low-frequency pump enabling a high-frequency probe for precise lesion formation; IEEE Trans. Ultrason. Ferroelectr. Control; 61(2); pp. 325-340; Feb. 2014; (Author Manuscript; 29 pages).
Liu et al.; Real-time 2-D temperature imaging using ultrasound; IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 57(1); pp. 12-16; Jan. 2010 (author manuscript, 16 pgs.).
Liu et al.; Viscoelastic property measurement in thin tissue constructs using ultrasound; IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control; 55(2); pp. 368-383; Feb. 2008 (author manuscript, 37 pgs.).
Manes et al.; Design of a Simplified Delay System for Ultrasound Phased Array Imaging; Sonics and Ultrasonics, IEEE Transactions on, vol. 30, pp. 350-354, Nov. 1983.
Maréchal et al; Effect of Radial Displacement of Lens on Response of Focused Ultrasonic Transducer; Japanese Journal of Applied Physics, vol. 46, p. 3077-3085; May 15, 2007.
Maréchal et al; Lens-focused transducer modeling using an extended KLM model; Ultrasonics, vol. 46, pp. 155-167, May 2007.
Martin et al.; Water-cooled, high-intensity ultrasound surgical applicators with frequency tracking; Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control, IEEE Transactions on, vol. 50, pp. 1305-1317, Oct. 2003.
Maxwell et al.; Cavitation clouds created by shock scattering from bubbles during histotripsy; J. Acoust. Soc. Am.; 130(4); pp. 1888-1898; Oct. 2011.
Maxwell et al.; Noninvasive Thrombolysis Using Pulsed Ultrasound Cavitation Therapy—Histotripsy; Ultrasound in Medicine & Biology, vol. 35, pp. 1982-1994, Dec. 2009 (author manuscript).
Maxwell; Noninvasive thrombolysis using histotripsy pulsed ultrasound cavitation therapy; PhD Dissertation. University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan. Jun. 2012.
Maxwell et al.; In-vivo study of non-invasive thrombolysis by histotripsy in a porcine model; IEEE international Ultrasonics Symposium; IEEE; pp. 220-223; Sep. 20, 2009.
Miller et al.; A review of in vitro bioeffects of inertial ultrasonic cavitation from a mechanistic perspective; Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology; vol. 22; pp. 1131-1154; (year of publication is sufficiently earlier than the effective U.S. filing date and any foreign priority date) 1996.
Miller et al.; Investigation of the mechanism of ARFI-based color doppler feedback of histotripsy tissue fractionation; Ultrasonic Symposium (IUS); 2013 IEEE International; 4 pages; Jul. 21-25, 2013.
Miller et al.; Real-time elastography-based monitoring of histotripsy tissue fractionation using color doppler; Ultrasonics Symposium (IUS); 2012 IEEE International; 8 pages; Oct. 7-10, 2012.
Nightingale et al.; Analysis of contrast in images generated with transient acoustic radiation force; Ultrasound Med Biol; 32(1); pp. 61-72; Jan. 2006.
Ohl et al.; Bubble dynamics, shock waves and sonoluminescence; Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. A; vol. 357; pp. 269-294; (year of publication is sufficiently earlier than the effective U.S. filing date and any foreign priority date) 1999.
Okada et al.; A case of hepatocellular carcinoma treated by MR-guided focused ultrasound ablation with respiratory gating; Magn Reson Med Sci; 5(3); pp. 167-171; Oct. 2006.
Palmeri et al.; Acoustic radiation force-based elasticity imaging methods; Interface Focus; 1; pp. 553-564; Aug. 2011.
Parsons et al.; Cost-effective assembly of a basic fiber-optic hydrophone for measurement of high-amplitude therapeutic ultrasound fields; The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, vol. 119, pp. 1432-1440, Mar. 2006.
Parsons et al.; Pulsed cavitational ultrasound therapy for controlled tissue homogenization; Ultrasound in Med. & Biol.; vol. 32(1); pp. 115-129; Jan. 2006.
Pishchalnikov et al.; Cavitation Bubble Cluster Activity in the Breakage of Kidney Stones by Lithotripter Shock Waves; J Endourol.; 17(7): 435-446; Sep. 2003.
Porter et al.; Reduction in left ventricular cavitary attenuation and improvement in posterior myocardial contrast . . . ; J Am Soc Echocardiography; pp. 437-441; Jul.-Aug. 1996.
Roberts et al.; Pulsed cavitational ultrasound: a noninvasive technology for controlled tissue ablation (histotripsy) in the rabbit kidney; Journal of Urology; vol. 175(2); pp. 734-738; Feb. 2006.
Rosenschein et al.; Ultrasound Imaging-Guided Noninvasive Ultrasound Thrombolysis: Preclinical Results; Circulation; vol. 102; pp. 238-245, Jul. 11, 2000.
Rowland et al.; MRI study of hepatic tumours following high intensity focused ultrasound surgery; British Journal of Radiology; 70; pp. 144-153; Feb. 1997.
Roy et al.; A precise technique for the measurement of acoustic cavitation thresholds and some preliminary results; Journal of the Acoustical Society of America; vol. 78(5); pp. 1799-805; Nov. 1985.
Sapareto et al.; Thermal dose determination in cancer therapy; Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 10(6); pp. 787-800; Apr. 1984.
Sapozhnikov et al.; Ultrasound-Guided Localized Detection of Cavitation During Lithotripsy in Pig Kidney in Vivo; IEEE Ultrasonics Symposium, vol. 2; pp. 1347-1350; Oct. 7-10, 2001.
Sato et al.; Experimental Investigation of Phased Array Using Tapered Matching Layers. 2002 IEEE Ultrasound Symposium. vol. 2; pp. 1235-1238, Oct. 2002.
Simonin et al.; Characterization of heterogeneous structure in a polymer object manufactured by stereolithography with low-frequency microechography; Journal of Materials Chemistry; vol. 6, pp. 1595-99, Sep. 1996.
Sokolov et al.; Use of a dual-pulse lithotripter to generate a localized and intensified cavitation field; Journal of the Acoustical Society of America; vol. 110(3); pp. 1685-1695; Sep. 2001.
Song et al.; Feasibility of Using Lateral Mode Coupling Method for a Large Scale Ultrasound Phased Array for Noninvasive Transcranial Therapy; Biomedical Engineering; IEEE Transactions on, vol. 57, pp. 124-133; Jan. 2010 (author manuscript).
Souchon et al.; Visualisation of HIFU lesions using elastography of the human prostate in vivo: Preliminary results; Ultrasound Med. Biol; 29(7); pp. 1007-1015; Jul. 2003.
Souquet et al.; Design of Low-Loss Wide-Band Ultrasonic Transducers for Noninvasive Medical Application; Sonics and Ultrasonics, IEEE Transactions on, vol. 26, pp. 75-80, Mar. 1979.
Therapeutic Ultrasound Group. Non-invasive Ultrasonic Tissue Fraction for Treatment of Benign Disease and Cancer—“Histotripsy”. University research [online]. Biomedical Engineering Department, University of Michigan. Jul. 2011[retrieved on Jan. 28, 2014] from: (http://web.archive.org/web/20110720091822/http://www.histotripsy.umich.edu/index.html>.entiredocument) Jul. 2011.
Toda; Narrowband impedance matching layer for high efficiency thickness mode ultrasonic transducers; Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control, IEEE Transactions on, vol. 49, pp. 299-306, Mar. 2002.
Urban et al.; Measurement of prostate viscoelasticity using shearwave dispersion ultrasound vibrometry (SDUV): an in vitro study; IEEE International Ultrasonics Symposium Proceedings (IUS); pp. 1141-1144; Oct. 11, 2010.
Van Kervel et al.; A calculation scheme for the optimum design of ultrasonic transducers; Ultrasonics, vol. 21, pp. 134-140, May 1983.
Wang et al.; Quantitative ultrasound backscatter for pulsed cavitational ultrasound therapy-histotripsy; Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control, IEEE Transactions on, vol. 56, pp. 995-1005, May 2009.
Wikipedia; Medical ultrasound; 15 pages; retrieved from the internet (https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Medical_utrasound&oldid=515340960) on Jan. 12, 2018.
Xie et al.; Correspondence of ultrasound elasticity imaging to direct mechanical measurement in aging DVT in rats; Ultrasound Med Biol; 31(10); pp. 1351-1359; Oct. 2005 (author manuscript, 20 pgs.).
Xu et al.; A new strategy to enhance cavitational tissue erosion by using a high intensity initiating sequence; IEEE Trans Ultrasonics Ferroelectrics and Freq Control; vol. 53(8); pp. 1412-1424; Aug. 2006.
Xu et al.; Controlled ultrasound tissue erosion: the role of dynamic interaction between insonation and microbubble activity; Journal of the Acoustical Society of America; vol. 117(1); pp. 424-435; Jan. 2005.
Xu et al.; Controlled ultrasound tissue erosion; IEEE Transaction on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics, and Frequency Control; vol. 51 (6); pp. 726-736; Jun. 2004.
Xu et al.; Effects of acoustic parameters on bubble cloud dynamics in ultrasound tissue erosion (histotripsy); Journal of the Acoustical Society of America; vol. 122(1); pp. 229-236; Jul. 2007.
Xu et al.; High Speed Imaging of Bubble Clouds Generated in Pulsed Ultrasound Cavitational Therapy Histotripsy; IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control; ; vol. 54; No. 10; pp. 2091R2101; Oct. 2007.
Xu et al.; Investigation of intensity threshold for ultrasound tissue erosion; Ultrasound in Med. & Biol.; vol. 31(12); pp. 1673-1682; Dec. 2005.
Xu et al.; Optical and acoustic monitoring of bubble cloud dynamics at a tissue-fluid interface in ultrasound tissue erosion; Journal of the Acoustical Society of America; vol. 121(4); pp. 2421-2430; Apr. 2007.
Yan et al.; A review of rapid prototyping technologies and systems; Computer-Aided Design, vol. 28, pp. 307-318, Apr. 1996.
Zhang et al.; A fast tissue stiffness-dependent elastography for HIFU-induced lesions inspection; Ultrasonics; 51(8); pp. 857-869; Dec. 2011.
Zheng et al.; An acoustic backscatter-based method for localization of lesions induced by high-intensity focused ultrasound; Ultrasound Med Biol; 36(4); pp. 610-622; Apr. 2010.
Hall et al.; U.S. Appl. No. 15/583,852 entitled “Method of manufacturing an ultrasound system,” filed May 1, 2017.
Xu et al.; U.S. Appl. No. 15/713,441 entitled “Bubble-induced color doppler feedback during histotripsy,” filed Sep. 22, 2017.
Sferrijzza et al.; Generation of high power unipolar pulse with a piezocomposite transducer; In 1999 IEEE Ultrasonics Symposium Proceedings; International Symposium (Cat. No. 99CH37027); vol. 2: pp. 1125-1128; Oct. 17, 1999.
Maxwell et al.; The role of compressional pressure in the formation of dense bubble clouds in histotripsy; 2009 IEEE International Ultrasonics Symposium; pp. 81-84; Sep. 20, 2009.
Xu et al.; U.S. Appl. No. 17/161,498 entitled Systems and methods for histotripsy immunosensitization, filed Jan. 28, 2021.
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20180154186 A1 Jun 2018 US
Provisional Applications (1)
Number Date Country
62184179 Jun 2015 US