The present invention relates generally to computer networks and specifically to failover or redundancy in network equipment.
The OSI model developed by the International Organization for Standards (ISO) serves a guideline for developing standards for data communication. Different pieces of network equipment are governed by these standards and allows for the interconnection of various network equipment.
The OSI, or Open System Interconnection, model defines a networking framework for implementing protocols in seven layers. Control is passed from one layer to the next, starting at the application layer in one station, proceeding to the bottom layer, over the channel to the next station and back up the hierarchy. The seven layers (L1 to L7) are briefly summarized as follows:
Network data switching equipment, such as that equipment used for switching or routing of information packets between network devices, handle data at the lower layers of the OSI model, while application level programs handle data at the higher OSI layers. It is desirable for network switching equipment to remain in operational condition for continuous periods of time.
A common administrative activity is the installation of new software or software modules. In most installations, it is desirable to avoid or at least minimize the impact of bringing down the system for such tasks. Whereas halting a higher level application for a software upgrade activity typically affects only the user or users of the application, halting operation of network switching equipment can impact a larger community of users, indeed possibly the entire enterprise. Software updates to applications are relatively easy to do because only a relatively limited number of users are usually affected. By comparison, the downtime that may result from performing software updates to network switching equipment could affect an entire enterprise.
Embodiments of the present invention provide techniques for facilitating software upgrade for a system such as a switching system or router.
According to an embodiment of the present invention, techniques are provided for facilitating software upgrade for a switching system in a hitless manner.
According to an embodiment of the present invention, techniques are provided for facilitating software upgrade for a switching system comprising a first management processor and a second management processor, the techniques comprising receiving a signal to perform a software upgrade for the first management processor, and performing a software upgrade for the first management processor without substantially affecting packet switching performed by the switching system.
In the descriptions to follow, specific details for the purposes of explanation are set forth in order to provide a thorough understanding of the invention. However, it will be apparent that the invention may be practiced without these specific details. For example, the embodiment described below makes reference to the BigIron® Series product from Foundry Networks, Inc. However, this is not intended to limit the scope of the present invention. The teachings of the present invention are also applicable to other boxes, devices, routers, switching systems, and data processing systems.
The network switching device 100 includes a processor 102a designated as the active management processor (active MP), or active management module. It will be appreciated that the processor 102a includes functional components such as a data processing unit, various memory components, control logic, driver circuits for interfacing with other elements of the network switching device 100, and interface circuits for remote access (e.g., by an administrator).
A user, typically an authorized system administrator, can interact with the network switching device 100 via the active management module 102a. The user can configure the other components of the network switching device 100, or otherwise inspect various data structures and machine states of the device, via the active management module 102a. The user can also perform software updates operations on the various components described below.
The active management module 102a is configured to provide a suitable user interface (e.g., command line interface, CLI) that allows the user to interact with the management module. The user can log onto the active management module 102a by way of a terminal that is connected to a maintenance port on the active management module, or some similar kind of port. Alternatively, the active management module 102a may be configured to provide the user with telnet access. It will be appreciated that the “user” can be a machine user; for example, a higher level management machine might be provided to management a large pool of network switching devices 100. In such a configuration, a suitable machine interface can be provided.
A connection plane referred to herein as control plane crosspoint 104 serves to interconnect the linecard modules 108 via their respective control lines, identified in the figure generally by the reference numeral 124. Control lines 124 from the management modules 102 also connect to the control plane 104. The control plane 104 routes control traffic among the linecard modules 108 and the management modules 102 in order to maintain proper route destinations among the linecard modules, ensure network convergence, and so on. In accordance with the present invention, both the active management module 102a and the standby management module(s) 102b receive control traffic.
A connection plane referred to herein as data plane crosspoint 106 serves to interconnect the linecard modules 108 via their respective data paths, identified in the figure generally by the reference numeral 126. The data plane 106 allows data packet traffic received from a source connected to one linecard module to be routed to destination that is connected to another linecard module. Of course, the source of the data traffic and the destination may be connected to the same linecard module.
Refer now to
The linecard module 108a further includes a data adapter 206 that is configured for connection to the packet processors 202 via data paths between the packet processors and the data adapter. The data adapter 206 is further configured for connection to the data plane 106. In this way, the linecard modules 108 can be connected to each other via corresponding data paths 126 to provide interconnectivity among the linecard modules. For example, in a typical implementation, a chassis can house some number of linecard modules. The chassis includes a backplane which has a plurality of connectors into which the linecard modules can be plugged. In this configuration, the data paths 126 would include the connection between data pins on the adapter 206 of one of the linecard modules and one of the backplane connectors.
The linecard module 108a further includes a linecard processor (LP) 204. The linecard processor 204 is connected to the packet processors 202 via corresponding control lines. The linecard processor 204 is also connected to the control plane 104 via the control line 124. The other linecard modules 108b-108d are similarly connected to the control plane 104. This allows for control/status information that is generated by the linecard modules 108 to be transmitted to the active management module 102a. Conversely, the active management module 102a can communicate control/status information it receives from the linecard modules 108 to any one or more of the other linecard modules.
Various processes and tasks execute as programs on the linecard processor 204 and in the packet processors 202, some of which will be discussed below. These processors comprise components such a data processor or microcontroller, memory (RAM, ROM), data storage devices, and suitable support logic in order store, load, and execute these programs.
In accordance with the present invention, the standby management module(s) 102b are connected to the control plane 104. This connection allows for the active management module 102a to transmit suitable information to the standby management module(s) 102b, and for the linecard modules to transmit suitable information to the standby management module(s) during operation of the system.
Following is a discussion of operation of the management processors 102 and linecard processors 204 in accordance with the present invention when software upgrades are made. Software upgrade processing is incorporated at system start up. Upgrade processing functionality includes similar functionality as described for failover switchover sequencing disclosed in the commonly owned application identified above (“hitless failover management”).
The acronym MP (management processor) will be used to refer to the management modules 102 shown in
First, a brief discussion of the start up sequence in the MPs will be given. This is followed by a brief description of switchover processing when the active MP experiences a failure. This will provide a backdrop against which to discuss aspects of the present invention.
A. Start-Up Sequence
1. Arbitration
When the network switching device 100 boots up (i.e., at power up, after a reset, etc.), MP active/standby arbitration is first performed in the monitor. Both processors begin executing, one processor becomes the active MP, the other processor becomes the standby MP. The process of MP active/standby arbitration is the method by which this determination is made. Typically, this is implemented using known hardware semaphore techniques, where each processor attempts to access the hardware semaphore. Only one processor will succeed; that processor designates itself as the active MP while the other processor designates itself as the standby MP. Alternatively, each processor can be configured by the user to be the active MP or a standby MP.
After MP active/standby arbitration is completed, the standby MP synchronizes its flash memory and boot images to the active MP (discussed below). After the synchronization, the standby MP loads the appropriate application image based on an instruction from the active MP (it may reset itself first if a new monitor or boot image is synced).
When the standby MP is ready to start its applications, MP active/standby arbitration is performed again. This second arbitration is performed to guard against the situation where the active MP resets or is removed after the first arbitration, but before the standby MP has a chance to install its interrupt service routine. In such a situation where the active MP was not available, the standby MP would then become the active MP. If the standby MP remains standby after this second arbitration, it then installs its ISR (interrupt service routine) and functions as a standby MP until an MP switchover interrupt occurs.
2. Active MP Operation
The active MP performs flash and boot image synchronization through a task executing on the active MP referred to as scp_task. The active MP reads in a startup configuration file and parses through the file. The configuration file can be stored in some form of programmable non-volatile memory, or on a disk drive. The active MP then synchronizes the standby MP with the configuration information (the running configuration), so that both the active MP and the standby MP have the same running configuration; i.e., the active MP sends over to the standby MP the running configuration. The scp_task will not reply to the standby MP until the startup configuration file is parsed by the active MP.
While the process of synchronizing the running configuration is in progress, CLI (command line interface), WEB, and SNMP inputs on the active MP are disabled until the standby MP is ready. This is to prevent the configuration state of the active MP from getting too far ahead of the standby MP due to configuration update information that can be received from users or linecard modules during the synchronization activity. When the running configuration is synchronized to the standby MP (i.e., the standby MP has the same configuration as the active MP), then the CLI, WEB, and SNMP interfaces can be executed on the active MP. Alternatively, it might be possible to allow these interfaces to run on the active MP, but simply queue up any input to be subsequently synchronized to the standby MP.
3. Standby MP Operation
After two arbitrations, the standby MP first starts a timer task called timer_task and a listener task called mp_rx_task. During normal startup processing standby MP then starts a task called redundancy_task, which performs a First Phase Software States synchronization operation. The First Phase Software States are the software states that are to be synchronized with the active MP before any other tasks are started. These states constitute the baseline software state in the standby MP. They include, for example, the running configuration, the CLI session modes, and in general the software states of any tasks that will execute on the standby MP.
After this baseline synchronization completes, the standby MP starts all other tasks. The synchronized running configuration (i.e., the running configuration sent over from the active MP) will be parsed when a task called the console_task is started. The standby MP will not initialize any of the hardware such as the linecard modules 108, and during operation of the system will drop all outgoing IPC packets it receives.
The scp task that runs on the standby MP views all slots as empty. This prevents the standby MP from running the card state machine and the port state machine. On the active MP, these state machines serve to keep track of the status of the linecard modules and the ports on the linecard modules during operation of system. Consequently, state changes in the linecard modules 108 and state changes in the ports of the linecard modules will not trigger an update by the standby MP, whereas updates will occur in the active MP since the card and port state machines do execute in the active MP.
However, in order to support upper layer components that may require the correct view of card and/or port states, the card and port states are synchronized between active and standby MPs. Thus, with reference to
B. Switchover Behavior
When the active MP resets (e.g., because it crashed, the processor locked up and a watchdog timer reset the processor, a user initiated the reset, etc.) an MP switchover happens and the standby MP will become the “newly active MP” upon completion of the MP switchover process.
Referring to
The scp_task in the standby MP registers for the “MP Switchover” event, and upon detecting the event, runs the card state machine to perform hot-switchover, step 308. In the case that the standby MP is synchronized with the active MP before the latter crashed, this action will have no effect on the linecard modules 108. However, in the event that the active MP crashed before it had a chance to synchronize the current card states and port states to the standby MP, then the MP's would be out of sync with respect to the linecard module states at the time the active MP reset. Running the card state machine in this case guarantees that the linecard modules 108 are in a state that the newly active MP thinks they should be in.
1. Card and Port State Machines During MP Switchover
As mentioned before, the standby MP views all slots empty. This prevents card and port state machines from running. When the scp_task receives the “MP Switchover” event, it changes all non-empty and non-powered-off slots to a “Recovery” state.
In the “Recovery” state, the standby MP sends card configurations to each the linecard modules 108 with an indication that it is due to MP switchover, step 402. If a given linecard module is in an “Up” state, it compares the received configurations against its cached configurations, steps 404, 406. If anything is missing from its cached configurations, it re-applies it, step 408. The linecard module then sends its card operational information to the standby MP, step 410. If the linecard module is not in the “Up” state, it resets itself, step 412. The transition from the “Recovery” state to the “Up” state bypasses switch fabric programming, and thus incurs no traffic hits. When a linecard module reaches the “Up” state, its ports kick off the port state machine.
Some upper layer components may want to run on the standby MP in exactly the same way as they did on the active MP. In this case, these upper layer components may require the correct view of cards and ports, as well as card and port up/down events. To facilitate this requirement, the up/down state of the linecard modules and their respective ports are synchronized to the standby MP, and a new set of card and port up/down events are provided. The set of events which the upper layer components can register for include:
2. Upper Layer Components Can Register for These Events.
After MP switchover completes, the linecard modules 108 report their card and port states through the “Recovery” state machine mechanism discussed above. These states may potentially conflict with those synchronized before the switchover. The consequences could be the missing of “Down” events (by default, all port states are down). To avoid this, after “Recovery” state machine completes, and when all ports have reached their final states, a new event “Port State Ready” is sent. Thus, referring to
C. Execution Flow for Software Upgrades
If the image download is successful, the next phase (step 1104), i.e., the hitless upgrade phase, starts by sending an ITC (inter task communication) request message to an scp task in the active MP. From there on until the upgrade is completed or aborted, the CLI is not accessible by the users. The scp task runs a state machine to monitor the upgrade process. To facilitate the description, we assume that we have 2 MPs, MP1 and MP2. When the upgrade process starts, MP1 is the active MP and MP2 is the standby MP.
First, the active (MP1) sends the upgrade information to the standby (MP2) by way of an upgrade request message, step 1106. Upon receiving the ACK, the active MP (MP1) performs a switchover process, boots with the image specified by MP_BOOT_SRC and becomes the new standby MP. Note that this switchover differs from the switchover discussed above in that the newly active MP does not perform a synchronization of its image with that of the previously active MP. The reason, of course, is that the previously active MP contains the old image. Continuing with
A discussion of failover processing is provided herein for completeness and is presented below in connection with
Referring to
When LP boot starts, it skips the memory controller initialization. When the monitor is loaded, it skips the backplane gigalink initialization. It then boots normally until the LP application is loaded. The MP will skip the flash image synchronization check. When the LP application is loaded, it will populate its software structures while blocking the access to the HW components during LP initialization, module configuration, and port configuration.
The MP will not send card down and port down events when LPs perform a core reset. When the LPs boot up with the upgraded images, the MP will send out card up and port up events, step 1208. Upon receiving card up and port up events, other SW components should discard its previous knowledge about LP state (i.e., LP is up from their point of views), and behave as if the LP is hot-inserted, and populate corresponding LP data structures.
1. Linecard Upgrade Events
The system code provides a number of events associated with the LP (linecard) software upgrade that various tasks on the MP (management module) can register to receive.
a. LP Upgrade Start
b. LP Upgrade Done
2. MAC Table
Before the LP upgrade begins, the hardware MAC table information is stored into a protected portion of memory. After the LP core reset, the MP synchronizes the software MAC table (exactly in the same way that the synchronization takes place on a normal reset). After this is completed, the MAC entry to hardware index association is recreated. Until this process is completed, all hardware accesses may be disabled.
3. VLAN Table and Configuration
VLAN configuration is synchronized to the LP on card up event. After an LP reset, the VLAN hardware accesses are disabled by the underlying system software. Once the LP application is up, hardware accesses are allowed. It is possible, e.g., due to a double failure, that there is a mismatch between the LP hardware configuration and the LP software configuration. The current implementation will verify the hardware and software configuration and fix any mismatch that is found. Other techniques may also be provided for recovering gracefully from double failures.
4. Protocols Configuration and Operation
The protocol configuration is synchronized to the LP when the card up event is detected on the management module. During the upgrade process, however, protocol packets need to be sent/received in order to maintain protocol stability. This is dependent on the length of the reset process and sensitivity of the protocol. For example, STP (Spanning Tree Protocol), the least sensitive of the supported protocols, will reconverge if no BPDU is received for max-age time (20 seconds). RSTP (Rapid Spanning Tree Protocol), on the other hand, will reconverge after 6 seconds. More sensitive protocols such as VSRP (Virtual Switch Redundancy Protocol, a Layer 2 protocol) and MRP (Metro Ring Protocol, a Layer 2 protocol), proprietary protocols owned by the assignee of the present invention, will converge in about 800 ms and 300 ms.
Protocols will register for all LP Upgrade Events. This section will detail the actions taken by protocols when each of the LP Upgrade Events are received.
a. LP Upgrade Start Event:
b. LP Upgrade Done Event
D. The User Interface
Next, is a discussion of portions of the command line interface relevant to the present invention. The software upgrade CLI (command line interface) command has the following syntax:
Where upgrade_script is a text file containing upgrade instructions. The format of this text file uses the following keywords:
The above keywords tell the system which line card(s) needs to be upgraded, and which application images to use. In general, a typical upgrade script instructs the system where to download the new images, and which images to load when performing hitless upgrade. The following is a typical upgrade script:
The above script instructs the system to download an image called rmb0220b1.bin to the MP's monitor, an image called rmpr02201b1.bin to the MP's primary, an image called rlb02200b1.bin to all of the LPs' monitors, and an image called rlp0220b1.bin to all of the LPs' primaries. The script then instructs the system to initiate the upgrade of the MP to run from its primary image, and all LP's from their primary images.
Notes:
In addition to the script-based user interface for hitless upgrade, a simplified CLI command may be provided. The script-based interface is very flexible and performs image download and upgrade in one script. However, the simplified command below assumes the images have been downloaded and both MP && LP images need to be upgraded:
hitless-reload mp [primary|secondary] lp [primary|secondary].
In addition to the standard CLI, it is noted that other suitable interfaces can be provided to implement the foregoing functions. For example, the “user” can be a machine user where the interface is some form of machine interface, such as a protocol-driven interface. This may facilitate an automated upgrading system that automatically performs upgrades in large installations.
E. In-Service Software Upgrade in the LP
1. LP Processing
Upgrade processing in the MP was discussed above. Turn now to
During normal operation, the active MP will send to an LP messages, which are either handled by the LP internally or result in the LP sending data packet(s) to the packet processor for transmission to a device connected to the LP. These events are identified by 1a and 1b. If the LP application will always send a data packet out in order to maintain a “live” connection with the devices connected to the LP. The packets are sent at a rate of one packet every 100 mS. The LP application will either send data packets for processing L1-L7 (OSI model) requests or, absent any data packets, send so-called “keep-alive” packets to maintain the data connection between the LP and the connected device. If the data connection is disrupted due to idleness, then a reconnection sequence with the connected device may have to be performed to re-establish the data connection.
An upgrade event 2b may begin with a user entering a software upgrade command via the CLI user interface, specifying one or more LPs to be upgraded. A task (SCP task) in the active MP sends an upgrade event 2b to the L2 task. The L2 task in the active MP begins the upgrade process in each LP by sending a save protocol packet (event 2c) to the LP. This initiates a series of upgrade activities in the LP. The first such activity is to save certain information that is used by the LP application (event 3).
Turning to
Returning to
At event 5, the monitor image that is stored in the code flash 1402a is decompressed and loaded into a memory space 1416a of the reserved memory 1416. This process typically requires less than 100 mS to complete. Again, during this event, the LP application is not providing L1-L7 functionality; however, one (or more) “keep-alive” packets continue to be sent by the application at a rate of one per 100 mS (event 4b).
Next, the LP application will issue a software reset request (event 6) to the currently executing monitor 1412, which resides in the top portion of the CPU address space 1402. First, an explanation of a “hard” reset (or a power-on reset) will be given.
A power-on reset or hard reset causes the LP's processing unit (CPU, microcontroller, etc., but generally referred to as the CPU) to start instruction/code execution at a fixed location (e.g., at 0xFFFF_FFFC) of the CPU address space 1402. This location is commonly referred to as the reset vector. The vector may be programmed to branch to the starting execution point of a boot image. For example, in one embodiment, a boot flash 1402b occupies a portion of the CPU address space and contains the boot image.
The reset vector points to the beginning of the boot image, and instruction execution begins from that point on. When boot image starts, various hardware components (not shown) are initialized, and certain data structures are set up. For example, the boot code will perform the following:
After the monitor image is successfully loaded into SDRAM (specifically, the top portion of the CPU address space as shown in
The application provides the functionality to support L1-L7 applications and features. The decompressed application image is executed as a separate task launched by the monitor. The total amount of time the CPU spends on initial boot up and loading the monitor code into the SDRAM is around 4 seconds. The Monitor takes another 8 seconds to complete kernel initialization, and to decompress and load the application image into SDRAM. This completes the hard reset or power-on reset processing.
A software reset is a process that allows the CPU to go through the same initialization sequence as discussed above, but without resetting the CPU and all the hardware devices in the system. In accordance with the present invention, there is a “standard” software reset and “hitless” software reset.
A “standard” software reset function does the following:
When CPU starts code execution at reset vector, CPU will go through the same reset process and reload all images such as boot, monitor, and application but bypass SDRAM reset and CPU memory controller initialization.
Returning to the discussion of
Since the LP application is not running when a “hitless” software reset is in progress, the monitor performs a protocol sending service in accordance with the present invention. This is a software feature that allows the CPU to continue sending protocol control packets while the CPU is in the process of loading new images. According to the present invention, when the LP receives a upgrade message at event 2d, all pending protocols will be saved. In particular, the protocol state of a communication between the LP and each device with which the LP is performing a protocol interaction is saved in the reserve memory 1416. Thus, for any service that was required at the time a “hitless” software reset is initiated, the LP application will compose protocol packets and store them in the reserved memory 1416 before soft reset. After the monitor code starts, the protocol sending service software stored in a region 1416b of the reserved memory 1416 executes and reconstructs the PCI memory mapping between CPU and packet processors and launches a temporary task. In one embodiment, this task will be activated every 100 mS (or some other appropriate time period), sending out protocol packets stored in the preserved memory. The service will be stopped when the application completes the hitless software upgrade initialization.
At this time, the monitor will also send a REBOOT message to the active MP (event 8), indicating to the active MP that the LP is booting up. The active MP will ACK the message (event 9), and in response the LP begins decompressing the compressed application image (event 10) that is stored in the code flash 1402a.
The decompressed application is stored in an area of the CPU address space 1402 to executed as the LP application 1414 (event 11). At this point, the monitor ceases the protocol sending service (event 12a) and allows the application to start sending protocols for L1-L7 functions or “keep-alive” packets (event 12b). The application will send an upgrade complete message to the active MP (event 13), after which time the active MP will resume its operation with the now booted LP (event 14a, 14b).
F. MP-to-MP Synchronization Framework (MPSF)
The following discussion is presented to provide a more complete description of active MP and standy MP switchover processing.
The MP-to-MP Synchronization Framework (MPSF) is a generic mechanism for synchronization between MPs. The MPSF provides the following functionalities:
MPSF synchronizes between software components. A software component can be a functional unit implemented in a program and executing on the management processor as a task. Examples include CLI or VLAN, or a service implemented in a library, such as forwarding identifier. All MPSF functionalities work per a software component id that is associated with each software component.
In order to add a new synchronization service, the following elements are needed:
As discussed above during startup, the running configuration read in by the active MP is synchronized by the active MP to the standby MP to establish the baseline state for the standby MP; i.e., baseline synchronization. The baseline synchronization of the running configuration is managed by the redundancy_task executing on the standby MP to establish the baseline state for all of the other tasks that will run on the standby MP subsequent to the startup sequence. The redundancy_task is therefore acting as a proxy for the other tasks, hence “proxy server based” baseline synchronization. It is noted that a baseline synchronization operation can be initiated if a standby MP is inserted into an already running system, in order to establish a baseline state for the newly inserted standby MP.
During normal operation, updates to the active MP will occur; e.g., updates by a user, updates from the linecard modules, etc. The standby NP will be synchronized with such updates by the active MP. Specifically, a task in the active MP which performs an update will initiate a sync operation (via it corresponding update routine) to sync the corresponding task in the standby MP by transferring the update information to the update routine in the standby MP corresponding to that task. This is referred to herein as peer-to-peer based synchronization since the task that performs the update in the active MP is the task that initiates the sync operation to the corresponding task on the standby MP.
The baseline or update synchronization operations can be performed in blocking mode or non-blocking mode. Critical states and data that are to be synchronized before further processing can be done should use blocking mode, otherwise, non-blocking mode is more appropriate. In addition, non-blocking mode sync operations need to be queued up in the active MP in order not to lose any configuration or state information that needs to be synced from the active MP to the standby MP. The term “synced” as used herein means copying information from a source (e.g., active MP) to a destination (e.g., standby MP).
1. Baseline Synchronization
The baseline in MPSF refers to states and databases upon which updates can be applied. Each software component has its corresponding set of state information. A software component must synchronize its baseline before any update can be synchronized. The baseline synchronization operation in MPSF is performed via scp_task. An important parameter in MPSF related to baseline is called “baseline_sync_done”, which is initialized to zero (“0”). This parameter is set to one (“1”) when the baseline synchronization successfully completes. When a software component gets out of sync between NPs, the baseline_sync_done parameter is reset to zero. This condition can arise, for example, when an update sync operation fails.
Depending on the value of “baseline_sync_done” and other conditions, an update synchronization request may be ignored, blocked or queued in accordance with the following:
1) baseline_sync_done=0
2) baseline_sync_done=1
If a task does not want to be blocked, it can call an API to check if the baseline synchronization for a particular software component is busy. If yes, it can alter its processing accordingly. One example is the CLI. If the baseline (i.e., CLI session mode & running configuration) synchronization has not completed, the CLI will prohibit users from entering configuration commands.
2. Update Synchronization
As discussed in the previous section, after the baseline synchronization is done, update synchronization is performed based on its mode.
a) Non-Blocking Update Synchronization
If the queue is empty, the update is sent to the standby MP immediately. Otherwise, the update is put into a queue in the active MP. When the standby MP sends a message to the active MP to inform the active MP that the previous update synchronization has completed, the request sitting at the top of the queue in the active MP is sent to standby MP.
b) Blocking Update Synchronization
In the case where update requests come from different tasks (e.g., forwarding identifier synchronization), it is possible that when one update request is issued, there is already another one in progress. In this case, the second caller is blocked. When the one in progress is done, it releases the second one.
c) Error Handling
When a software component is out of sync between MPs, its consequences depend on the software component and the actual data. If the result of this out of sync is only to cause a potential traffic hit during switchover, this is considered an example of a non-critical failure. Otherwise, it is considered a critical failure.
In anon-critical failure, it is sufficient for the software component to re-establish the baseline synchronization. Timeouts can be scheduled to perform the baseline synchronization again.
In a critical failure, more drastic actions may be taken. There are two options:
In this way, the standby MP can determine that a software component is out of sync by checking the its dirty-bit is when a switchover event happens. The actions that the newly active MP takes in this case can range from re-start the software component to resetting the linecard modules.
Following is an illustrative listing of the MPSF API (application program interface). As noted above, each software (SW) component has a unique ID.
G. Configuration Synchronization
This section discusses the synchronization of CLI (command line interface) configurations. Configuration commands typically involve configuration of one or more of the linecard modules 108. A CLI session is provided by executing the console_task on the active MP which be initiated from the console, or from a telnet session. Each CLI session operates independently of any other CLI sessions.
Referring to
Once the baseline is established, each CLI configuration command is synchronized to the corresponding console_task running on the standby MP and executed. A filter is implemented such that non-configuration CLI commands (e.g., “show version”) are not synchronized. Such non-configuration commands do not change the configuration state and so need not be synced.
A particular CLI configuration command is executed on the active MP in the following order:
The configuration information in the standby MP is likely to be more recent than the configuration of the linecard modules because the configuration command is synced to the standby MP (which then begins executing the command) before the configuration command is executed by the active MP itself, and the standby MP acknowledges the command and begins to process the command. Therefore, after an MP switchover completes, the newly active MP should re-send its configurations to the linecard modules in case the failed MP did not have a chance to configure the linecard modules before failing. Each linecard module can then update its cached configurations with the resent configurations. The linecard modules should execute those configurations that are missing from its cached configurations and ignore those configurations that were already executed. This re-send of configurations should be taken care of on a software component basis. This ensures that the actual configurations of the linecard modules match the configurations in the newly active MP.
H. Forwarding Identifier Synchronization
Software components use forwarding identifiers to manipulate traffic; e.g., forwarding data packets to their destinations. Forwarding identifier synchronization consists of two parts: 1) maintain correct forwarding identifiers for the software components in the active and standby MP's; and 2) synchronize forwarding identifier changes between the MP's.
If a software component that uses forwarding identifiers runs on both MPs, the software component in one MP must be guaranteed to be given the same forwarding identifier as its counterpart in the other MP when a request is made to allocate a forwarding identifier. To accomplish this, we need to make the process of allocating forwarding identifiers to be context-aware. In other words, a forwarding identifier that is allocated to a particular software component in the active MP is assigned an “application context”. This “application context” is synchronized to the standby MP as part of the forwarding identifier structure for forwarding identifiers allocated in the standby MP. When the corresponding software component on the standby MP asks for a free forwarding identifier, the forwarding identifier mechanism can locate the correct forwarding identifier based on the “application context” supplied by the caller.
One issue with this mechanism is that the action of asking for a free forwarding identifier on the standby MP, and the synchronization of an allocated forwarding identifier (and the “application context” associated with it) are asynchronously performed. Consequently, the allocated forwarding identifier and its “application context” may not be synchronized when the software component on the standby MP requests a forwarding identifier, with the result that the allocated forwarding identifier will not match the forwarding identifier that was allocated in the active MP. A solution is to return “Invalid FWDING_ID” in this case. When the allocated forwarding identifier is finally synchronized, use its associated context to locate the software component data, and replace the “Invalid FWDING_ID” with the synchronized one.
Following is an example of this mechanism with reference to
On the active MP:
On the standby MP:
I. Trunk Synchronization
A “trunk” command issued via a CLI is synchronized to the standby MP and executed there. The trunks on the standby MP will have all ports disabled since all of the linecard modules 108 are in a “Not Present” state. When switchover happens, trunk configurations are re-sent to the linecard modules by the newly active MP. Each linecard module will execute those configurations that are missing from its cached configurations, and ignore those configurations that were already executed. In this way, the actual trunk configurations of the linecard modules will match the trunk configurations in the newly active MP.
For a trunk to work properly across an MP switchover, the following issues need to be resolved:
J. L2 Design
The foregoing sections introduced various components in the underlying architecture for redundant operation in network switching equipment in accordance with the present invention. An overview of various Layer 1 (L1) entities and their processes were also discussed. The following sections provide an overview of various Layer 2 (L2) entities that execute on the active MP and their functions. It also summarizes the requirements from each of these entities. Each L2 entity will be discussed in more detail under each subsection. Within each subsection, 2 specific aspects are addressed—
Typical layer 2 entities include a MAC (media access control) manager, a VLAN (virtual local area network) manager and L2 protocol managers for non-proprietary protocols such as STP (spanning tree protocol), RSTP (rapid spanning tree protocol), MSTP (multiple spanning tree protocols), and protocols such as MRP (metro ring protocol) and VSRP (virtual switch redundancy protocol) which are proprietary protocols owned by the assignee of the present invention. On MP switchover, the newly active MP is faced with line cards (also referred to herein as line cards) that are already initialized and contain configuration and state that may or may not be in sync with the newly active MP. Therefore, the configuration and states in the line cards need to be verified, updated, and/or synchronized to match the newly active MP.
A function of the MAC manager is to perform MAC station learning and propagation/synchronization functions. When a MAC station is unknown, the database manager learns the MAC by adding to its database and synchronizes the newly learned MAC station to all line cards that may be interested. When the line cards detect an MP switchover event, they send the list of MAC addresses that were learnt locally to the newly active MP. The management module then updates its own MAC station table. It is noted that in any event the MAC station learning process in the MAC manager is self-healing in that it will auto-correct even if synchronization by the line cards does not take place correctly.
The VLAN manager allows a user to configure port memberships and properties associated with corresponding VLAN identifiers. It interacts with the protocols to propagate port state changes and MAC station flush requests. It also interacts with a VLAN agent executing on a line card to program its hardware. Further, the VLAN manager handles grouping mechanisms such as topology groups and vlan-groups. On MP switchover, the VLAN manager executing on the standby MP is expected to know the configuration (port memberships and properties) associated with individual VLANs. This configuration may need to be verified against the information that is currently stored in the line cards.
Each protocol manager (e.g., STP manager, MRP manager, VSRP manager, etc) operates specific protocol instances over certain sets of ports. The protocol manager can operate multiple instances of the protocol with different port memberships. The relationship of each protocol manager with the line cards is limited—only associated with programming the CAM (content addressable memory) to allow protocol packets to be processed on a blocked port. The MRP manager also sets up CAM entries to allow protocol packets to be forwarded by hardware. On MP switchover, the protocol manager needs to check if the line cards have their CAM's programmed as expected. There are other issues such as handling acknowledgments from the line card associated with setting the port state and packet sequence number matching (discussed in more detail below).
The synchronization paradigm for L2 entities generally follows the MPSF framework. The L1 processes discussed above synchronize the configuration to the standby MP. The L2 processes focus on enforcing the configuration on the line cards. The L2 processes running on the standby MP do not perform an explicit step of learning the linecard configurations. Instead, events from the line cards that are normally sent to the active MP are also sent to the standby MP. Thus, the L2 processes on the standby MP receive all line card events as they are received by the active MP. Thus, there is no need for the active MP to sync events it receives to the standby MP. This approach has the following benefits:
On MP switchover, the L2 processes on the newly active MP will enforces its configuration and state onto the line cards, thus guaranteeing that the configuration information in the newly active MP matches the configuration of the line cards.
1. MAC Synchronization
The MAC manager keeps track of the MAC station table. In a specific embodiment of the present invention, this table can store up to 2 million MAC entries at capacity. The standby MP does not keep track of the MAC station table. There is no synchronization of MAC table entries between the active MP and the standby MP in the start-up sequence discussed above. Therefore, when the standby MP becomes active, its MAC table is empty.
Refer to
The newly active MP processes this request as a learn request by updating its MAC station table with information provided by the line card (step 910). Once it updates its own MAC station table, the MAC manager executing on the newly active MP synchronizes the MAC information to the other line cards (step 912). When this MAC entry is synchronized, each receiving line card updates its MAC entry to reflect the change in the management module id (step 914). This approach has many benefits:
2. VLAN Synchronization
The VLAN manager mostly handles configuration requests and protocol requests. It also triggers events and updates when required. The L1 process will synchronize the baseline configuration. This means that the VLAN entity on the standby MP will be configured exactly as in the active MP. This may not always be true, however, since it is possible that the configuration may have gone out of sync, for example, if the active MP crashed during a specific configuration command.
The basic framework as discussed above is that the VLAN processes on the standby and active MP's operate more or less independently of each other. The L1 process gives the same inputs to both the active and the standby; e.g., port up events, trunk create events etc. This would allow the state on the VLAN operational parameters to be in sync.
a) Interaction Between Standby and Active MP
The standby MP will not perform any operation that requires communication with a line card. Effectively, it will not send out IPC messages to the line card and will not process IPC messages from the line card. The VLAN manager in the active MP expects an ACK from the line card; e.g., when setting the state associated with an RSTP port. This ACK will not be required by the corresponding VLAN manager executing on the standby MP. There is little synchronization between the VLAN manager processes across management modules.
Forwarding identifier synchronization between standby and active MPs is an important issue. Since the VLAN manager processes are independent across MPs, it is possible that the forwarding identifier manager in one MP (e.g., the active MP) will not return the same forwarding identifiers to matching VLANs in the other MP. This is especially true if the standby MP is booted up after numerous configuration steps have been taken place on the active MP (i.e., the VLANs have been configured out-of-order). Since the active MP has already synchronized all the forwarding identifier database information to the line card, it would be difficult to modify the forwarding identifiers associated with VLANs. Thus, in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention, forwarding identifier synchronization is handled in L1 processing as discussed above. VLAN synchronization proceeds as follows:
B) Failover Event Handling
When a failover event is detected, an MP switchover occurs and the standby MP becomes the active MP. The newly active MP will send and receive IPC messages. As discussed above, the newly active MP synchronizes its current state with all the line cards that are currently operational. This includes the VLAN configuration, the topology group configuration, the SuperSPAN™ and VE configurations, and so on. This could lead to overwriting on some structures in the line cards. However, if the management modules were synchronized at the time of MP switchover, this would not lead to any changes. Changes are required from the line card to be able to interpret the changes.
In accordance with another embodiment of the present invention, the management modules may be kept in sync every step of the way. The management modules would then be more likely to be synchronized when FAILOVER happens. Another approach is to have a dead time on the line card when conflict-resolution was attempted (This was in the case when there were differences between the standby module and the line cards). Using this approach, the information in the line cards is considered, the traffic is not stopped even if there are differences in the line card and management module states.
c) Line Card VLAN Agent
There are minimal changes in the line card to process an MP switchover event. These are mostly verification routines to make sure that the VLANs are all configured correctly. If the VLAN information in the newly active MP does not match the line card configuration or is out-of-date, it will still be used because that is the state that the newly active MP sees at this point. The current approach of overwriting the line card state and configuration with what is known to the newly active MP simplifies implementation on the VLAN agent.
In operation, the VLAN agent compares the configuration on the newly active MP with the configuration in the line card. If the configuration is different, the VLAN agent modifies its configuration in the line card to match the configuration on the newly active MP. This could be enhanced as described earlier with conflict-resolution type implementation where the differences are flagged and revisited after a certain interval (called dead-time).
In one embodiment, the line card VLAN agent always starts with a clean slate when the active MP fails and the standby MP takes over. Processing in the line card includes:
3. Protocol Synchronization
Protocol synchronization is different from VLAN synchronization in that there is little interaction between the protocol manager on the active MP and the protocol agent in the line card. In fact, most of the protocol interaction with the line card is through the VLAN manager. However, the interaction between the protocol entities across management modules may need to be significantly higher.
An example of an issue would be the case when the standby MP is booted up after the STP (spanning tree protocol) manager on the active MP has converged. The corresponding STP manager on the standby MP requires some amount of time to converge, and so the spanning trees between the active NP and standby MP will not match for a period of time.
In one embodiment of the present invention, protocol synchronization is performed in a manner similar to that of the VLAN synchronization. In this embodiment, each protocol may run independently on the standby MP. It would receive all events and protocol packets from the line card in order to keep it up to date with the active MP. This is referred to herein as “protocol redundancy.”
a) Protocol Redundancy for STP (Spanning Tree Protocol)
In the case of STP, the port states are computed in a predictable manner for a given configuration of bridge protocol data units (BDPUs). This fact allows the standby MP to arrive at the same STP result (port state configuration) as in the active MP when the former becomes the newly active MP. Referring to
STP TCNs (Topology Change Notifications) require acknowledgement from the root bridge. It is possible that when the standby MP comes up after the active MP, its TCN will go unacknowledged. This is because the root bridge is not really seeing the BPDUs of the standby MP. To account for this case, the STP TCNs in the standby MP will be assumed to receive acknowledgements.
b) Protocol Redundancy for RSTP
In the case of the RSTP protocol, the RSTP manager on the standby MP will receive all events as received by the active MP. The RSTP manager in the standby MP will not send out BPDUs but will receive and process BPDUs.
The relationship with the VLAN manager is tricky due to the ACK mechanism (blocking port state set call). In order to proceed with the RSTP Port state transitions (PST) state machine, an ACK from the line card is needed. This ACK is needed to confirm that the port has been set to the appropriate state.
Therefore, according to an embodiment of the present invention, all port state set calls will be non-blocking on the standby MP (both the VLAN manager and RSTP manager use non-blocking calls). The standby will also ignore ACKs sent by the line card. The linecard will also send the ACK to the management module that made the request, rather than to the active MP. This will avoid corner cases during failover such as when the ACK is incorrectly sent to the active MP causing a transition before the hardware is setup.
RSTP requires handshaking (in some cases) between peers on point-to-point links. An example is the proposal-agree mechanism between a designated port and the root port. If this handshake is already completed by the time the standby MP comes up, the RSTP manager running on the standby MP will never know that the handshake had been performed.
Solution: There are 2 cases here—(1) when the standby has a designated port that should have received a BPDU with the “agree flag” set, or (2) the standby has a root port that should have received a BPDU with the “propose flag” set.
c) Protocol Redundancy for MRP
Although MRP is a proprietary protocol, a brief discussion of redundancy processing for MRP will be made for completeness. The MRP manager on the standby MP will receive all events and packets called “ring PDUs” (similar to BPDUs) as received by the MRP manager in the active module. There are issues in the MRP that are not related to spanning-tree protocols”
d) Protocol Redundancy for VSRP
Although VSRP is a proprietary protocol, a brief discussion of redundancy processing for VSRP will be made for completeness. VSRP shares similar issues as MRP. Due to the increased sensitivity of the protocol, it is imperative that VSRP/MRP packets get sent out from the standby MP as soon as it becomes active. This is achieved by running the VSRP manager on both the active MP and the standby MP. VSRP will re-converge within 800 ms if VSRP packets cannot be sent or received.
When a FAILOVER event is detected, VSRP freezes the timers to allow the line card to initialize. The following timers are frozen—dead timer, the hold down timer, backup expiry timer. The dead timer and the hold-down timer keep track of the time since the last VSRP message was received from the VSRP master.
Transmission of VSRP packets will continue as scheduled since the VSRP manager on the standby MP is operating under the assumption that it is the active MP. Once L1 detects the switchover, it will allow transmission of L2 protocols that were previously black holed.
e) Protocol Redundancy—VSRP Aware
Although VSRP aware is a proprietary protocol, a brief discussion of redundancy processing for VSRP aware will be made for completeness. VSRP aware sessions are synchronized by the linecard on startup. This process is similar to the MAC table synchronization. The standby MP does not store VSRP aware sessions. On failover, the newly active MP does not have any VSRP aware sessions stored.
When a line card detects the arrival of the newly active MP, it traverses through all of its local VSRP aware sessions and sends the information to the newly active MP. The newly active then synchronizes these sessions to the other line cards. An aware session that does not get anymore VSRP packets will simply age out.
Although specific embodiments of the invention have been described, various modifications, alterations, alternative constructions, and equivalents are also encompassed within the scope of the invention. The described invention is not restricted to operation within certain specific data processing environments, but is free to operate within a plurality of data processing environments. Additionally, although the present invention has been described using a particular series of transactions and steps, it should be apparent to those skilled in the art that the scope of the present invention is not limited to the described series of transactions and steps.
Further, while the present invention has been described using a particular combination of hardware and software, it should be recognized that other combinations of hardware and software are also within the scope of the present invention. The present invention may be implemented only in hardware, or only in software, or using combinations thereof.
The specification and drawings are, accordingly, to be regarded in an illustrative rather than a restrictive sense. It will, however, be evident that additions, subtractions, deletions, and other modifications and changes may be made thereunto without departing from the broader spirit and scope of the invention.
This application claims priority from U.S. Provisional Application No. 60/754,932 filed Dec. 28, 2005, and, U.S. Provisional Application No. 60/762,283, filed Jan. 25, 2006, both of which are incorporated by reference in their entirety for all purposes. This application is related to U.S. Provisional Application No. 60/754,739 filed Dec. 28, 2005 and to co-pending U.S. application Ser. No. 11/586,991 filed Oct. 25, 2006, both of which are incorporated by reference in their entirety for all purposes.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3866175 | Seifert, Jr. et al. | Feb 1975 | A |
4325119 | Grandmaison et al. | Apr 1982 | A |
4348725 | Farrell et al. | Sep 1982 | A |
4628480 | Floyd | Dec 1986 | A |
4667323 | Engdahl et al. | May 1987 | A |
4679190 | Dias et al. | Jul 1987 | A |
4683564 | Young et al. | Jul 1987 | A |
4698748 | Juzswik et al. | Oct 1987 | A |
4723243 | Joshi et al. | Feb 1988 | A |
4754482 | Weiss | Jun 1988 | A |
4791629 | Burns et al. | Dec 1988 | A |
4794629 | Pastyr et al. | Dec 1988 | A |
4807280 | Posner et al. | Feb 1989 | A |
4876681 | Hagiwara et al. | Oct 1989 | A |
4896277 | Vercellotti et al. | Jan 1990 | A |
4985889 | Frankish et al. | Jan 1991 | A |
5101404 | Kunimoto et al. | Mar 1992 | A |
5136584 | Hedlund | Aug 1992 | A |
5195181 | Bryant et al. | Mar 1993 | A |
5208856 | Leduc et al. | May 1993 | A |
5224108 | McDysan et al. | Jun 1993 | A |
5231633 | Hluchyj et al. | Jul 1993 | A |
5280582 | Yang et al. | Jan 1994 | A |
5282196 | Clebowicz | Jan 1994 | A |
5287477 | Johnson et al. | Feb 1994 | A |
5299190 | LaMaire et al. | Mar 1994 | A |
5299195 | Shah | Mar 1994 | A |
5301192 | Henrion | Apr 1994 | A |
5307345 | Lozowick et al. | Apr 1994 | A |
5323386 | Wiher et al. | Jun 1994 | A |
5365512 | Combs et al. | Nov 1994 | A |
5377189 | Clark | Dec 1994 | A |
5390173 | Spinney et al. | Feb 1995 | A |
5392279 | Taniguchi | Feb 1995 | A |
5406643 | Burke et al. | Apr 1995 | A |
5408469 | Opher et al. | Apr 1995 | A |
5430442 | Kaiser et al. | Jul 1995 | A |
5436893 | Barnett | Jul 1995 | A |
5461615 | Henrion | Oct 1995 | A |
5490258 | Fenner | Feb 1996 | A |
5506840 | Pauwels et al. | Apr 1996 | A |
5506841 | Sandquist | Apr 1996 | A |
5521923 | Willmann et al. | May 1996 | A |
5530302 | Hamre et al. | Jun 1996 | A |
5546385 | Caspi et al. | Aug 1996 | A |
5550816 | Hardwick et al. | Aug 1996 | A |
5563948 | Diehl et al. | Oct 1996 | A |
5566170 | Bakke et al. | Oct 1996 | A |
5598410 | Stone | Jan 1997 | A |
5600795 | Du | Feb 1997 | A |
5619497 | Gallagher et al. | Apr 1997 | A |
5640504 | Johnson, Jr. | Jun 1997 | A |
5646878 | Samra | Jul 1997 | A |
5649089 | Kilner | Jul 1997 | A |
5663952 | Gentry, Jr. | Sep 1997 | A |
5663959 | Nakagawa | Sep 1997 | A |
5666353 | Klausmeier et al. | Sep 1997 | A |
5721819 | Galles et al. | Feb 1998 | A |
5732080 | Ferguson et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
5734826 | Olnowich et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
5740176 | Gupta et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
5745708 | Weppler et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
5751710 | Crowther et al. | May 1998 | A |
5802287 | Rostoker et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5815146 | Youden et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5818816 | Chikazawa et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5835496 | Yeung et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5838684 | Wicki et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5862350 | Coulson | Jan 1999 | A |
5864555 | Mathur et al. | Jan 1999 | A |
5867675 | Lomelino et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
5870538 | Manning et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
5872769 | Caldara et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
5872783 | Chin | Feb 1999 | A |
5875200 | Glover et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
5896380 | Brown et al. | Apr 1999 | A |
5907566 | Benson et al. | May 1999 | A |
5907660 | Inoue et al. | May 1999 | A |
5909686 | Muller et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
5915094 | Kouloheris et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
5920566 | Hendel et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
5920886 | Feldmeier | Jul 1999 | A |
5936939 | Des Jardins et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5936966 | Ogawa et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5956347 | Slater | Sep 1999 | A |
5999528 | Chow et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6000016 | Curtis et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6011910 | Chau et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
6016310 | Muller et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
6023471 | Haddock et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6031843 | Swanbery et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6035414 | Okazawa et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6038288 | Thomas et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6067298 | Shinohara | May 2000 | A |
6067606 | Holscher et al. | May 2000 | A |
6076115 | Sambamurthy et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6081522 | Hendel et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6088356 | Hendel et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6094434 | Kotzur et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6104696 | Kadambi et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6104700 | Haddock et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6104969 | Kadambi et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6108306 | Kalkunte et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6118787 | Kalkunte et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6125417 | Bailis et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6128666 | Muller et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6144668 | Bass et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6147996 | Laor et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6151301 | Holden | Nov 2000 | A |
6151497 | Yee et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6154446 | Kadambi et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6157643 | Ma | Dec 2000 | A |
6160809 | Adiletta et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6160812 | Bauman et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6172990 | Deb et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6178520 | DeKoning et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6181699 | Crinion et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6185222 | Hughes | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6195335 | Calvignac et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6201492 | Amar et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6212586 | Mros et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6222845 | Shue et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6243667 | Kerr et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6249528 | Kothary | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6263374 | Olnowich et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6272144 | Berenbaum et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6304903 | Ward | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6320859 | Momirov | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6333929 | Drottar et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6335932 | Kadambi et al. | Jan 2002 | B2 |
6335935 | Kadambi et al. | Jan 2002 | B2 |
6343072 | Bechtolsheim et al. | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6351143 | Guccione et al. | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6356550 | Williams | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6356942 | Bengtsson et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6359879 | Carvey et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6363077 | Wong et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6366557 | Hunter | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6369855 | Chauvel et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6421352 | Manaka et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6424658 | Mathur | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6424659 | Viswanadham et al. | Jul 2002 | B2 |
6427185 | Ryals et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6430190 | Essbaum et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6442067 | Chawla et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6457175 | Lerche | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6459705 | Cheng | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6460088 | Merchant | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6463063 | Bianchini, Jr. et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6466608 | Hong et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6470436 | Croft et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6473428 | Nichols et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6473433 | Bianchini, Jr. et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6477174 | Dooley et al. | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6480477 | Treadaway et al. | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6490280 | Leung | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6493347 | Sindhu et al. | Dec 2002 | B2 |
6496502 | Fite et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6505281 | Sherry | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6510138 | Pannell | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6522656 | Gridley | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6532229 | Johnson et al. | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6532234 | Yoshikawa et al. | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6535504 | Johnson et al. | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6549519 | Michels et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6553370 | Andreev et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6556208 | Congdon et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6567404 | Wilford | May 2003 | B1 |
6570884 | Connery et al. | May 2003 | B1 |
6577631 | Keenan et al. | Jun 2003 | B1 |
6587432 | Putzolu et al. | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6591302 | Boucher et al. | Jul 2003 | B2 |
6601186 | Fox et al. | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6606300 | Blanc et al. | Aug 2003 | B1 |
6628650 | Saite et al. | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6633580 | Torudbakken et al. | Oct 2003 | B1 |
6636483 | Pannell | Oct 2003 | B1 |
6643269 | Fan et al. | Nov 2003 | B1 |
6654342 | Dittia et al. | Nov 2003 | B1 |
6654346 | Mahalingaiah et al. | Nov 2003 | B1 |
6654370 | Quirke et al. | Nov 2003 | B1 |
6654373 | Maher, III et al. | Nov 2003 | B1 |
6658002 | Ross et al. | Dec 2003 | B1 |
6661791 | Brown | Dec 2003 | B1 |
6671275 | Wong et al. | Dec 2003 | B1 |
6678248 | Haddock et al. | Jan 2004 | B1 |
6681332 | Byrne et al. | Jan 2004 | B1 |
6683872 | Saito | Jan 2004 | B1 |
6687217 | Chow et al. | Feb 2004 | B1 |
6687247 | Wilford et al. | Feb 2004 | B1 |
6691202 | Vasquez et al. | Feb 2004 | B2 |
6696917 | Heitner et al. | Feb 2004 | B1 |
6697359 | George | Feb 2004 | B1 |
6697368 | Chang et al. | Feb 2004 | B2 |
6700894 | Shung | Mar 2004 | B1 |
6708000 | Nishi et al. | Mar 2004 | B1 |
6721229 | Cole | Apr 2004 | B1 |
6721268 | Ohira et al. | Apr 2004 | B1 |
6721313 | Van Duyne | Apr 2004 | B1 |
6721338 | Sato | Apr 2004 | B1 |
6731875 | Kartalopoulos | May 2004 | B1 |
6735218 | Chang et al. | May 2004 | B2 |
6745277 | Lee et al. | Jun 2004 | B1 |
6747971 | Hughes et al. | Jun 2004 | B1 |
6751224 | Parruck et al. | Jun 2004 | B1 |
6754881 | Kuhlmann et al. | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6765866 | Wyatt | Jul 2004 | B1 |
6775706 | Fukumoto et al. | Aug 2004 | B1 |
6778546 | Epps et al. | Aug 2004 | B1 |
6781990 | Puri et al. | Aug 2004 | B1 |
6785290 | Fujisawa et al. | Aug 2004 | B1 |
6788697 | Aweya et al. | Sep 2004 | B1 |
6792484 | Hook | Sep 2004 | B1 |
6792502 | Pandya et al. | Sep 2004 | B1 |
6798740 | Senevirathne et al. | Sep 2004 | B1 |
6804220 | Odenwalder et al. | Oct 2004 | B2 |
6804731 | Chang et al. | Oct 2004 | B1 |
6807179 | Kanuri et al. | Oct 2004 | B1 |
6807363 | Abiko et al. | Oct 2004 | B1 |
6810038 | Isoyama et al. | Oct 2004 | B1 |
6810046 | Abbas et al. | Oct 2004 | B2 |
6813243 | Epps et al. | Nov 2004 | B1 |
6813266 | Chiang et al. | Nov 2004 | B1 |
6816467 | Muller et al. | Nov 2004 | B1 |
6831923 | Laor et al. | Dec 2004 | B1 |
6831932 | Boyle et al. | Dec 2004 | B1 |
6836808 | Bunce et al. | Dec 2004 | B2 |
6839346 | Kametani | Jan 2005 | B1 |
6842422 | Bianchini | Jan 2005 | B1 |
6854117 | Roberts | Feb 2005 | B1 |
6856600 | Russell et al. | Feb 2005 | B1 |
6859438 | Haddock et al. | Feb 2005 | B2 |
6865153 | Hill et al. | Mar 2005 | B1 |
6895528 | Cantwell et al. | May 2005 | B2 |
6901072 | Wong | May 2005 | B1 |
6906936 | James et al. | Jun 2005 | B1 |
6912637 | Herbst | Jun 2005 | B1 |
6920154 | Achler | Jul 2005 | B1 |
6925516 | Struhsaker et al. | Aug 2005 | B2 |
6934305 | Duschatko et al. | Aug 2005 | B1 |
6937606 | Basso et al. | Aug 2005 | B2 |
6946948 | McCormack et al. | Sep 2005 | B2 |
6957258 | Maher, III et al. | Oct 2005 | B2 |
6959007 | Vogel et al. | Oct 2005 | B1 |
6973092 | Zhou et al. | Dec 2005 | B1 |
6975599 | Johnson et al. | Dec 2005 | B1 |
6978309 | Dorbolo | Dec 2005 | B1 |
6980552 | Belz et al. | Dec 2005 | B1 |
6982974 | Saleh et al. | Jan 2006 | B1 |
6990102 | Kaniz et al. | Jan 2006 | B1 |
6993032 | Dammann et al. | Jan 2006 | B1 |
6996663 | Marsteiner | Feb 2006 | B1 |
7005812 | Mitchell | Feb 2006 | B2 |
7009968 | Ambe et al. | Mar 2006 | B2 |
7012919 | So et al. | Mar 2006 | B1 |
7065673 | Subramaniam et al. | Jun 2006 | B2 |
7080238 | Van Hoof et al. | Jul 2006 | B2 |
7082133 | Lor et al. | Jul 2006 | B1 |
7103041 | Speiser et al. | Sep 2006 | B1 |
7120744 | Klein | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7126948 | Gooch et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7126956 | Scholten | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7176911 | Kidono et al. | Feb 2007 | B1 |
7185141 | James et al. | Feb 2007 | B1 |
7185266 | Blightman et al. | Feb 2007 | B2 |
7187687 | Davis et al. | Mar 2007 | B1 |
7188237 | Zhou et al. | Mar 2007 | B2 |
7190696 | Manur et al. | Mar 2007 | B1 |
7191277 | Broyles | Mar 2007 | B2 |
7194652 | Zhou et al. | Mar 2007 | B2 |
7203194 | Chang et al. | Apr 2007 | B2 |
7206283 | Chang et al. | Apr 2007 | B2 |
7212536 | Mackiewich et al. | May 2007 | B2 |
7218637 | Best et al. | May 2007 | B1 |
7219293 | Tsai et al. | May 2007 | B2 |
7228509 | Dada et al. | Jun 2007 | B1 |
7236490 | Chang et al. | Jun 2007 | B2 |
7237058 | Srinivasan | Jun 2007 | B2 |
7249306 | Chen | Jul 2007 | B2 |
7266117 | Davis | Sep 2007 | B1 |
7272611 | Cuppett et al. | Sep 2007 | B1 |
7272613 | Sim et al. | Sep 2007 | B2 |
7277425 | Sikdar | Oct 2007 | B1 |
7283547 | Hook et al. | Oct 2007 | B1 |
7284236 | Zhou et al. | Oct 2007 | B2 |
7286534 | Kloth | Oct 2007 | B2 |
7324509 | Ni | Jan 2008 | B2 |
7355970 | Lor | Apr 2008 | B2 |
7356030 | Chang et al. | Apr 2008 | B2 |
7366100 | Anderson et al. | Apr 2008 | B2 |
7391769 | Rajkumar et al. | Jun 2008 | B2 |
7428693 | Obuchi et al. | Sep 2008 | B2 |
7468975 | Davis | Dec 2008 | B1 |
7512127 | Chang et al. | Mar 2009 | B2 |
7558193 | Bradbury et al. | Jul 2009 | B2 |
7561590 | Walsh | Jul 2009 | B1 |
7590760 | Banks et al. | Sep 2009 | B1 |
7596139 | Patel et al. | Sep 2009 | B2 |
7609617 | Appanna et al. | Oct 2009 | B2 |
7613991 | Bain | Nov 2009 | B1 |
7624283 | Bade et al. | Nov 2009 | B2 |
7636369 | Wong | Dec 2009 | B2 |
7649885 | Davis et al. | Jan 2010 | B1 |
7657703 | Singh | Feb 2010 | B1 |
7721297 | Ward | May 2010 | B2 |
7738450 | Davis | Jun 2010 | B1 |
7813367 | Wong | Oct 2010 | B2 |
7817659 | Wong | Oct 2010 | B2 |
7830884 | Davis | Nov 2010 | B2 |
7903654 | Bansal | Mar 2011 | B2 |
7933947 | Fleischer et al. | Apr 2011 | B2 |
7948872 | Patel et al. | May 2011 | B2 |
7953922 | Singh | May 2011 | B2 |
7953923 | Singh | May 2011 | B2 |
7978614 | Wong et al. | Jul 2011 | B2 |
7978702 | Chang et al. | Jul 2011 | B2 |
7995580 | Patel et al. | Aug 2011 | B2 |
8014278 | Subramanian et al. | Sep 2011 | B1 |
8037399 | Wong et al. | Oct 2011 | B2 |
8090901 | Lin et al. | Jan 2012 | B2 |
8140044 | Villain et al. | Mar 2012 | B2 |
8149839 | Hsu et al. | Apr 2012 | B1 |
8155011 | Wong et al. | Apr 2012 | B2 |
20010001879 | Kubik et al. | May 2001 | A1 |
20010007560 | Masuda et al. | Jul 2001 | A1 |
20010026551 | Horlin | Oct 2001 | A1 |
20010048785 | Steinberg | Dec 2001 | A1 |
20010053150 | Clear et al. | Dec 2001 | A1 |
20020001307 | Nguyen et al. | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20020012585 | Kalkunte et al. | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20020040417 | Winograd et al. | Apr 2002 | A1 |
20020054594 | Hoof et al. | May 2002 | A1 |
20020054595 | Ambe et al. | May 2002 | A1 |
20020069294 | Herkersdorf et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020073073 | Cheng | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020085499 | Toyoyama et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020087788 | Morris | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020089937 | Venkatachary et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020089977 | Chang et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020091844 | Craft et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020091884 | Chang et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020105966 | Patel et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020126672 | Chow et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020131437 | Tagore-Brage | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020141403 | Akahane et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020146013 | Karlsson et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020161967 | Kirihata et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020169786 | Richek | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20020191605 | Van Lunteren et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20030009466 | Ta et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030012198 | Kaganoi et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030033435 | Hanner | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030043800 | Sonksen et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030043848 | Sonksen | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030048785 | Calvignac et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030061459 | Aboulenein et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030074657 | Bramley, Jr. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030081608 | Barri et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20030095548 | Yamano | May 2003 | A1 |
20030103499 | Davis et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030103500 | Menon et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030108052 | Inoue et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030110180 | Calvignac et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030115403 | Bouchard et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030120861 | Calle et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030128668 | Yavatkar et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030137978 | Kanetake | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030152084 | Lee et al. | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20030152096 | Chapman | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20030156586 | Lee et al. | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20030159086 | Arndt | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20030165160 | Minami et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20030169470 | Alagar et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20030174719 | Sampath et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20030177221 | Ould-Brahim et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20030198182 | Pegrum et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030200343 | Greenblat et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030214956 | Navada et al. | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20030215029 | Limberg | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20030223424 | Anderson et al. | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20030223466 | Noronha, Jr. et al. | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20030227943 | Hallman et al. | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20040022263 | Zhao et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040028060 | Kang | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040054867 | Stravers et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040062130 | Chiang | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040062245 | Sharp et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040062246 | Boucher et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040083404 | Subramaniam et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040088469 | Levy | May 2004 | A1 |
20040128434 | Khanna et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040141504 | Blanc | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040179548 | Chang et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040190547 | Gordy et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040208177 | Ogawa | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040208181 | Clayton et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040223502 | Wybenga et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040235480 | Rezaaifar et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040264380 | Kalkunte et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050010630 | Doering et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050010849 | Ryle et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050041684 | Reynolds et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050089049 | Chang et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050097432 | Obuchi et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050120122 | Farnham | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050132132 | Rosenbluth et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050132179 | Glaum et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050138276 | Navada et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050144369 | Jaspers | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050152324 | Benveniste | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050152335 | Lodha et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050169317 | Pruecklmayer | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050175018 | Wong | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050185577 | Sakamoto et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050185652 | Iwamoto | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050193316 | Chen | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050201387 | Willis | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050226236 | Klink | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050246508 | Shaw | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20050249124 | Elie-Dit-Cosaque et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20060031610 | Liav et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060034452 | Tonomura | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060050690 | Epps et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060077891 | Smith et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060092829 | Brolin et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
20060092929 | Chun | May 2006 | A1 |
20060114876 | Kalkunte | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060146374 | Ng et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060165089 | Klink | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060209685 | Rahman et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060221841 | Lee et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060268680 | Roberts et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20070038798 | Bouchard et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070088974 | Chandwani et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070127464 | Jain et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070179909 | Channasagara | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070208876 | Davis | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070253420 | Chang et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070258475 | Chinn et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070288690 | Wang et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20080002707 | Davis | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080025309 | Swallow | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080031263 | Ervin et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080037544 | Yano et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080049742 | Bansal et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080069125 | Reed et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080092020 | Hasenplaugh et al. | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080095169 | Chandra et al. | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080117075 | Seddigh et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080126652 | Vembu et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080181103 | Davies | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080205407 | Chang et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080307288 | Ziesler et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20090175178 | Yoon et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090279423 | Suresh et al. | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20090279440 | Wong et al. | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20090279441 | Wong et al. | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20090279541 | Wong et al. | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20090279542 | Wong et al. | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20090279546 | Davis | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20090279548 | Davis et al. | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20090279549 | Ramanathan et al. | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20090279558 | Davis et al. | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20090279559 | Wong et al. | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20090279561 | Chang et al. | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20090282148 | Wong et al. | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20090282322 | Wong et al. | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20090287952 | Patel et al. | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20090290499 | Patel et al. | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20100034215 | Patel et al. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100046521 | Wong | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100061393 | Wong | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100100671 | Singh | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100135313 | Davis | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100161894 | Singh | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100246588 | Davis | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100293327 | Lin et al. | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20110002340 | Davis | Jan 2011 | A1 |
20110044340 | Bansal et al. | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110069711 | Jha et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110110237 | Wong et al. | May 2011 | A1 |
20120023309 | Abraham et al. | Jan 2012 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
1380127 | Jan 2004 | EP |
2003289359 | Oct 2003 | JP |
2004-537871 | Dec 2004 | JP |
WO 0184728 | Nov 2001 | WO |
WO 02041544 | May 2007 | WO |
Entry |
---|
U.S. Appl. No. 12/639,762, filed Dec. 16, 2009, Singh. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/639,749, filed Dec. 16, 2009, Singh. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/624,300, filed Nov. 23, 2009, Davis et al. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/608,985, filed Oct. 29, 2009, Wong. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/608,972, filed Oct. 29, 2009, Wong. |
Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/831,950, mailed on Jan. 6, 2010, 21 pages. |
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/953,742, mailed on Nov. 19, 2009, 51 pages. |
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/953,743, mailed on Nov. 23, 2009, 47 pages. |
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/953,745, mailed on Nov. 24, 2009, 48 pages. |
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/953,751, mailed on Nov. 16, 2009, 55 pages. |
Requirement for Restriction/Election for U.S. Appl. No. 11/668,322, mailed on Oct. 29, 2009, 6 pages. |
Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 10/139,912, mailed on Oct. 19, 2009, 17 pages. |
Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 10/139,912, mailed on Nov. 23, 2009, 4 pages. |
Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/745,008, mailed on Dec. 30, 2009, 27 pages. |
Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 11/828,246, mailed on Nov. 16, 2009, 20 pages. |
Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/621,038, mailed on Dec. 23, 2009, 27 pages. |
Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/611,067, mailed on Oct. 16, 2009, 35 pages. |
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/611,067, mailed on Dec. 8, 2009, 11 pages. |
Advisory Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/831,950, mailed on Mar. 4, 2010, 4 pages. |
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/779,714, mailed on Mar. 31, 2010, 26 pages. |
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 10/810,208, mailed on Feb. 5, 2010, 13 pages. |
Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/668,322, mailed on Feb. 24, 2010, 33 pages. |
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/854,486, mailed on Jan. 12, 2010, 23 pages. |
Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 10/140,751, mailed on Mar. 25, 2010, 29 pages. |
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/198,697, mailed on Feb. 2, 2010, 50 pages. |
Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 10/140,749, mailed on Jan. 13, 2010, 44 pages. |
Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/615,769, mailed on Jan. 22, 2010, 34 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 10/139,912, filed May 6, 2002, Davis et al. |
U.S. Appl. No. 10/140,749, filed May 6, 2002, Davis et al. |
U.S. Appl. No. 10/140,751, filed May 6, 2002, Davis. |
U.S. Appl. No. 10/140,752, filed May 6, 2002, Davis et al. |
U.S. Appl. No. 10/140,753, filed May 6, 2002, Davis et al. |
U.S. Appl. No. 10/141,223, filed May 7, 2002, Veerabadran et al. |
U.S. Appl. No. 10/810,208, filed Mar. 26, 2004, Wong et al. |
U.S. Appl. No. 10/832,086, filed Apr. 26, 2004, Wong. |
U.S. Appl. No. 11/118,697, filed Apr. 28, 2005, Singh. |
U.S. Appl. No. 11/586,991, filed Oct. 25, 2006, Ramanathan et al. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/417,913, filed Apr. 3, 2009, Patel et al. |
U.S. Appl. No. 11/621,038, filed Jan. 8, 2007, Davis. |
U.S. Appl. No. 11/724,965. |
U.S. Appl. No. 11/779,714, filed Jul. 18, 2007, Wong et al. |
U.S. Appl. No. 11/779,778, filed Jul. 18, 2007, Wong et al. |
U.S. Appl. No. 11/828,246, filed Jul. 25, 2007, Davis. |
U.S. Appl. No. 11/831,950, filed Jul. 31, 2007, Suresh et al. |
U.S. Appl. No. 11/953,742, filed Dec. 10, 2007, Wong et al. |
U.S. Appl. No. 11/953,743, filed Dec. 10, 2007, Wong et al. |
U.S. Appl. No. 11/953,745, filed Dec. 10, 2007, Wong et al. |
U.S. Appl. No. 11/953,751, filed Dec. 10, 2007, Wong et al. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/372,390, filed Feb. 17, 2009, Chang et al. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/400,594, filed Mar. 9, 2009, Patel et al. |
10 Gigabit Ethernet—Technology Overview White Paper, Sep. 2001, 16 pages. |
10 Gigabit Ethernet Alliance, Interconnection with Wide Area Networks, Version 1.0, Mar. 2002, 5 pages. |
“IEEE Standard for Information technology—Telecommunications and information exchange between systems—Local and metropolitan area network—common specifications. Part 3: Media Access Control (MAC) Bridges,” ANSI/IEEE Standard 802.1D, 1998,373, pp. 1998 Edition, IEEE. |
Belhadj et al., “Feasibility of a 100GE MAC”, PowerPoint Presentation, IEEE Meeting Nov. 2006, Nov. 13-15, 2006, 18 pages. |
Braun et al., “Fast incremental CRC updates for IP over ATM networks,” IEEE Workshop on High Performance Switching and Routing, 2001, pp. 48-52. |
Degermark, et al., “Small Forwarding Tables for Fast Routing Lookups,” ACM Computer Communications Review, Oct. 1997, 12 pages, vol. 27 No. 4. |
BigIron Architecture Technical Brief, Oct. 1998, 15 pages, Version 1.0, Foundry Networks. |
BigIron Architecture Technical Brief, Oct. 1998, 15 pages, Version 1.02, Foundry Networks. |
BigIron Architecture Technical Brief, Dec. 1998,14 pages, Version 1.03, Foundry Networks. |
BigIron Architecture Technical Brief, May 1999, 15 pages, Version 2.0, Foundry Networks. |
BigIron Architecture Technical Brief, May, 1999, 15 pages, Version 2.01, Foundry Networks. |
BigIron Architecture Technical Brief, Jul. 2001, 16 pages, Version 2.02, Foundry Networks. |
“Foundry Networks, Next Generation Terabit System Architecture—The High Performance Revolution for 10 Gigabit Networks,” Nov. 17, 2003, 27 pages. |
“JetCore™ Based Chassis Systems—An Architecture Brief on NetIron, Big Iron, and FastIron Systems,” IronClad Network Performance, Jan. 17, 2003, 27 pages, Foundry Networks, Inc. |
“Gigabit Ethernet Alliance, Accelerating the Standard for Speed,” 1998, 19 pages, Gigabit Ethernet Alliance. |
Kichorowsky, et al., “Mindspeed Switch Fabric Offers the Most Comprehensive Solution for Multi-Protocol Networking Equipment,” Apr. 30, 2001, 3 pages. |
Matsumoto, et al., “Switch Fabrics Touted At Interconnects Conference,” Aug. 21, 2000, 2 pages, at URL: http://www.eetimes.com/story/OEG2000821S0011, printed on Aug. 12, 2002. |
McAuley, et al., “Fast Routing Table Lookup Using CAMs,” Proceedings of INFOCOM, Mar.-Apr. 1993, pp. 1382-1391. |
Mier Communications, Inc., “Lab Testing Summary Report—Product Category: Layer—3 Switches, Vendor Tested:, Product Tested: Foundry Networks, BigIron 4000,” Report No. 231198, Oct. 1998, 6 pages. |
Mier Communications, Inc.,“Lab Testing Summary Report—Product Category: Gigabit Backbone Switches, Vendor Tested: Foundry Networks, Product Tested: BigIron 4000,” Report No. 210998, Sep. 1998, 6 pages. |
“17×17 3.2 Gbps Crosspoint Switch with Input Equalization—M21110,” Feb. 1, 2001, 2 pages, Mindspeed—A Conexant Business,. |
“Switch Fabric Chipset—CX27300 iScale.TM.,” Apr. 30, 2001, 2 pages, Mindspeed—A Conexant Business,. |
Newton, Newton's Telecom Dictionary, CMP Books, Mar. 2004, 20th Ed., p. 617. |
Satran et al., “Out of Order Incremental CRC Computation,” IEEE Transactions on Computers, Feb. 25, 2003, 11 pages, vol. 54, issue 9. |
Spurgeon, “Éthernet, The Definitive Guide,” O'Reilly & Associates, Inc., Sebastapol, CA, Feb. 2000. |
“Foundry Networks, Inc.—BigIron 4000, Layer 2 & Layer 3 Interoperability Evaluation,” Oct. 1999, 4 pages, No. 199133, The Tolly Group. |
“Foundry Networks, Inc.—BigIron 8000 Gigabit Ethernet Switching Router, Layer 2 & Layer 3 Performance Evaluation,” May, 1999, 4 pages, No. 199111, The Tolly Group. |
International Search Report of the International Searching Authority for Application No. PCT/US03/08719, mailed Jun. 17, 2003. 1 page. |
International Preliminary Examination Report for Application No. PCT/US2001/043113, mailed Oct. 21, 2003, 6pages. |
Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority for Application No. PCT/US2001/043113, mailed May 1, 2003, 6 pages. |
International Search Report for Application No. PCT/US2001/043113, mailed Dec. 13, 2002, 2 pages. |
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 09/855,024. mailed Jun. 4, 2002, 10 pages. |
Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 09/855,024, mailed Jan. 15, 2003, 20 pages. |
Advisory Action for U.S. Appl. No. 09/855,024, mailed May 2, 2003. |
Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 09/855,024, mailed Nov. 3, 2003. |
Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 09/855,024, mailed Dec. 15, 2003. 6 pages. |
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 10/810,301, mailed Mar. 17, 2005, 11 pages. |
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 10/810,301, mailed Feb. 16, 2006, 12 pages. |
Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 10/810,301, mailed Jul. 28, 2006, 5 pages. |
Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 10/810,301, mailed Feb. 6, 2007, 9 pages. |
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 09/855,025, mailed Nov. 23, 2004, 17 pages. |
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 09/855,031, mailed May 22, 2002. |
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 09/855,031, mailed Dec. 10, 2002. |
Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 09/855,031, mailed Jul. 30, 2003. |
Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 09/855,031, mailed Nov. 4, 2003. |
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 10/736,680, mailed Feb. 16, 2006, 18 pages. |
Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 10/736,680, mailed Aug. 3, 2006, 10 pages. |
Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 10/736,680, mailed Feb. 22, 2007, 12 pages. |
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 10/210,041, mailed Sep. 10, 2003, 12 pages. |
Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 10/210,041, mailed Jan. 7, 2004, 14 pages. |
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 10/210,041, mailed Mar. 11, 2004, 12 pages. |
Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 10/210,041, mailed Jul. 7, 2004, 13 pages. |
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 10/210,041, mailed Feb. 9, 2005, 7 pages. |
Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 10/210,041, mailed Aug. 24, 2005, 7 pages. |
Advisory Action for U.S. Appl. No. 10/210,041, mailed Dec. 13, 2005, 4 pages. |
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 10/210,108, mailed Jun. 12, 2003, 6 pages. |
Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 10/210,108, mailed Oct. 7, 2003. |
Requirement for Restriction/Election for U.S. Appl. No. 10/438,545, mailed Oct. 31, 2003. |
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 10/438,545, mailed Dec. 12, 2003, 7 pages. |
Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 10/438,545, mailed Jun. 15, 2004, 4 pages. |
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/611,067, mailed Feb. 20, 2009, 11 pages. |
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/615,769, mailed Apr. 15, 2009, 11 pages. |
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 10/832,086, mailed Sep. 19, 2007, 12 pages. |
Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 10/832,086, mailed May 1, 2008, 31 pages. |
Advisory Action for U.S. Appl. No. 10/832,086, mailed Jul. 21, 2008, 4 pages. |
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 10/832,086, mailed Sep. 18, 2008, 18 pages. |
Non Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 10/832,086, mailed Apr. 1, 2009 ,17 pages. |
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/586,991, mailed Oct. 2, 2008, 23 pages. |
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 10/810,208, mailed Jul. 16, 2007, 24 pages. |
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 10/810,208, mailed Dec. 18, 2007, 40 pages. |
Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 10/810,208, mailed Jun. 11, 2008, 34 pages. |
Advisory Action for U.S. Appl. No. 10/810,208, mailed Aug. 27, 2008, 4 pages. |
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 10/810,208, mailed Feb. 13, 2009, 17 pages. |
Requirement for Restriction/Election for U.S. Appl. No. 10/140,752, mailed May 18, 2006, 8 pages. |
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 10/140,752, mailed Dec. 14, 2006, 17 pages. |
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 10/140,752, mailed Apr. 23, 2007, 6 pages. |
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 10/140,752, mailed Jan. 24, 2008, 8 pages. |
Notice of Allowance of U.S. Appl. No. 10/140,752, mailed Jul. 24, 2008, 14 pages. |
Notice of Allowance of U.S. Appl. No. 10/140,752, mailed Sep. 10, 2008, 4 pages. |
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/668,322, mailed Mar. 23, 2009, 19 pages. |
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/854,486, mailed Jul. 20, 2009, 29 pages. |
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 10/139,912, mailed Jan. 25, 2006, 14 pages. |
Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 10/139,912, mailed Aug. 11, 2006, 26 pages. |
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 10/139,912, mailed Apr. 20, 2007, 20 pages. |
Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 10/139,912, mailed Nov. 28, 2007, 20 pages. |
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 10/139,912, mailed Aug. 1, 2008, 21 pages. |
Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 10/139,912, mailed Feb. 5, 2009, 8 pages. |
Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 10/139,912, mailed Jun. 8, 2009, 8 pages. |
Requirement for Restriction/Election for U.S. Appl. No. 10/140,751, mailed Apr. 27, 2006, 5 pages. |
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 10/140,751, mailed Aug. 10, 2006, 15 pages. |
Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 10/140,751, mailed Apr. 10, 2007, 16 pages. |
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 10/140,751, mailed Oct. 30, 2007, 14 pages. |
Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 10/140,751, mailed May 28, 2008, 19 pages. |
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 10/140,751, mailed Sep. 17, 2008, 15 pages. |
Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 10/140,751, mailed Mar. 17, 2009, 17 pages. |
Advisory Action for U.S. Appl. No. 10/140,751, mailed Jun. 1, 2009, 3 pages. |
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/745,008, mailed May 14, 2009, 27 pages. |
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 10/141,223, mailed Feb. 23, 2006, 25 pages. |
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 10/141,223, mailed Feb. 13, 2007, 29 pages. |
Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 10/141,223, mailed Aug. 21, 2007, 25 pages. |
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 10/141,223, mailed Dec. 28, 2007, 13 pages. |
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 10/141,223, mailed Sep. 3, 2008, 22 pages. |
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 10/139,831, mailed Oct. 17, 2005, 7 pages. |
Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 10/139,831, mailed Feb. 9, 2006, 7 pages. |
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 10/139,831, mailed Jun. 27, 2006, 9 pages. |
Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 10/139,831, mailed Nov. 28, 2006, 17 pages. |
Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 10/139,831, mailed Jun. 14, 2007, 26 pages. |
Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 10/139,831, mailed Jun. 26, 2007, 25 pages. |
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/828,246, mailed Jun. 15, 2009, 26 pages. |
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 10/140,088, mailed Apr. 27, 2006, 13 pages. |
Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 10/140,088, mailed Sep. 7, 2006, 13 pages. |
Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 10/140,088, mailed Oct. 24, 2006, 8 pages. |
Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 10/140,088, mailed Jan. 11, 2007, 5 pages. |
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/621,038, mailed Apr. 23, 2009, 44 pages. |
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 10/140,749, mailed Aug. 10, 2006, 22 pages. |
Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 10/140,749, mailed Jun. 27, 2007, 23 pages. |
Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 10/140,749, mailed Jan. 8, 2008, 23 pages. |
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 10/140,749, mailed Jun. 6, 2008, 28 pages. |
Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 10/140,749, mailed Dec. 8, 2008, 30 pages. |
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 10/140,749, mailed May 27, 2009, 38 pages. |
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 10/140,753, mailed Apr. 20, 2006, 11 pages. |
Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 10/140,753, mailed Jan. 10, 2007, 27 pages. |
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 10/140,753, mailed Aug. 22, 2007, 14 pages. |
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 10/140,753, mailed Jan. 8, 2008, 14 pages. |
Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 10/140,753, mailed Aug. 25, 2008, 22 pages. |
Requirement for Restriction/Election for U.S. Appl. No. 11/000,359, mailed Jun. 20, 2008, 7 pages. |
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/000,359, mailed Oct. 23, 2008, 28 pages. |
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/000,359, mailed May 29, 2009, 14 pages. |
Requirement for Restriction/Election for U.S. Appl. No. 11/118,697, mailed Jun. 2, 2009, 8 pages. |
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 09/855,038, mailed Jun. 2, 2005, 14 pages. |
Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 09/855,038, mailed Feb. 7, 2006, 8 pages. |
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 09/855,038, mailed Oct. 4, 2006, 14 pages. |
Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 09/855,038, mailed Apr. 26, 2007, 8 pages. |
Requirement for Restriction/Election for U.S. Appl. No. 09/988,066, mailed Dec. 13, 2005, 7 pages. |
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 09/988,066, mailed Jul. 14, 2006, 17 pages. |
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 09/988,066, mailed Apr. 6, 2007, 22 pages. |
Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 09/988,066, mailed Oct. 31, 2007, 16 pages. |
Advisory Action for U.S. Appl. No. 09/988,066, mailed May 28, 2008, 4 pages. |
Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 09/988,066, mailed Oct. 30, 2008, 16 pages. |
Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 09/988,066, mailed Jan. 9, 2009. |
Non Final Office Action U.S. Appl. No. 11/804,977, mailed Jan. 14, 2008, 13 pages. |
Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 11/804,977, mailed Nov. 19, 2008, 17 pages. |
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 09/855,015, mailed Oct. 28, 2004, 12 pages. |
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 09/855,015, mailed Jan. 12, 2006, 6 pages. |
Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 09/855,015, mailed Sep. 8, 2006, 3 pages. |
Requirement for Restriction/Election for U.S. Appl. No. 09/855,015, mailed Nov. 3, 2006, 6 pages. |
Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 09/855,015, mailed Jan. 7, 2008, 4 pages. |
Supplemental Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 09/855,015, mailed Feb. 4, 2008, 3 pages. |
Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/953,742, mailed on Jun. 14, 2010, 21 pages. |
Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/953,743, mailed on Jul. 15, 2010, 21 pages. |
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/953,745, mailed on Jun. 14, 2010, 19 pages. |
Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/953,751, mailed on Jun. 25, 2010, 24 pages. |
Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 10/810,208, mailed on Jul. 15, 2010, 15 pages. |
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/668,322, mailed on Jun. 22, 2010, 16 pages. |
Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 11/854,486, mailed on Jul. 13, 2010, 12 pages. |
Advisory Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/745,008, mailed on Apr. 21, 2010, 8 pages. |
Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 11/621,038, mailed on Apr. 28, 2010, 15 pages. |
Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/198,697, mailed on Aug. 2, 2010, 55 pages. |
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/400,594, mailed on May 14, 2010, 53 pages. |
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/372,390, mailed on Apr. 22, 2010, 46 pages. |
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/070,893, mailed on Jun. 10, 2010, 44 pages. |
Advisory Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/615,769, mailed on May 25, 2010, 3 pages. |
Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 11/615,769, mailed on Jul. 12, 2010, 14 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/198,697, filed Aug. 26, 2008, Hsu et al. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/505,390, filed Jul. 17, 2009, Patel et al. |
Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 10/832,086, mailed on Sep. 29, 2009, 26 pages. |
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/831,950, mailed on Aug. 18, 2009, 49 pages. |
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/779,714, mailed on Sep. 1, 2009, 58 pages. |
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 10/810,208, mailed on Aug. 24, 2009, 38 pages. |
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 10/140,751, mailed on Sep. 28, 2009, 34 pages. |
Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 11/000,359, mailed on Sep. 22, 2009, 17 pages. |
Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 11/118,697, mailed on Sep. 30, 2009, 41 pages. |
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 10/140,751, mailed on Dec. 20, 2010, 23 pages. |
Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 12/400,645, mailed on Jan. 26, 2011, 14 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/880,518, filed Sep. 13, 2010, Wong. |
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/953,742, mailed on Mar. 30, 2011, 23 pages. |
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/953,751, mailed on Mar. 29, 2011, 29 pages. |
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/779,778, mailed on Feb. 2, 2011, 63 pages. |
Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/668,322, mailed on Feb. 1, 2011, 17 pages. |
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/795,492, mailed on Mar. 17, 2011, 51 pages. |
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/198,710, mailed on Mar. 24, 2011, 40 pages. |
Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 12/639,749, mailed on Feb. 11, 2011, 51 pages. |
Notice of Allowance for U.S. App. No. 12/639,762, mailed on Mar. 4, 2011, 7 pages. |
Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 12/400,594, mailed on Mar. 23, 2011, 11 pages. |
Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 12/372,390, mailed on Mar. 9, 2011, 8 pages. |
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/070,893, mailed on Mar. 18, 2011, 7 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/795,492, filed Jun. 7, 2010, Davis et al. |
Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/779,714, mailed on Nov. 9, 2010, 24 pages. |
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/198,697, mailed on Oct. 25, 2010, 36 pages. |
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/198,710, mailed on Sep. 28, 2010, 15 pages. |
Requirement for Restriction/Election for U.S. Appl. No. 12/639,749, mailed on Dec. 7, 2010, 3 pages. |
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/639,762, mailed on Sep. 1, 2010, 40 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/702,031, filed Feb. 8, 2010, Davis. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/466,277, filed May 14, 2009, Lin. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/198,710, filed Aug. 26, 2008, Zhang et al. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/883,073, filed Sep. 15, 2010, Davis. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/900,279, filed Oct. 7, 2010, Bansal et al. |
Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/400,594, mailed on Oct. 28, 2010, 13 pages. |
Non-Final Office for U.S. Appl. No. 12/400,645, mailed on Sep. 1, 2010, 45 pages. |
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/372,390, mailed on Sep. 13, 2010, 10 pages. |
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/505,390, mailed on Oct. 28, 2010, 51 pages. |
Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/070,893, mailed on Nov. 24, 2010, 11 pages. |
Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 11/779,778, mailed on Jul. 28, 2011, 9 pages. |
Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/795,492, mailed Jul. 20, 2011, 11 pages. |
Requirement for Restriction/Election for U.S. Appl. No. 12/466,277, mailed on Aug. 9, 2011, 6 pages. |
Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 11/953,743, mailed on Apr. 28, 2011, 19 pages. |
Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 10/140,751, mailed on Jun. 28, 2011, 23 pages. |
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/702,031, mailed on Apr. 29, 2011, 5 pages. |
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/198,697, mailed on May 20, 2011, 43 pages. |
Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 11/831,950, mailed May 16, 2012, 11 pages. |
Edwards, et al., “Pipeline Method and System for Switching Packets,” U.S. Appl. No. 13/398,725, filed Feb. 16, 2012, 54 pages. |
Hsu, et al., “Selection of Trunk Ports and Paths Using Rotation ,” U.S. Appl. No. 13/407,397, filed Feb. 28, 2012, 30 pages. |
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/831,950, mailed Aug. 26, 2011, 45 pages. |
Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/831,950, mailed Feb. 28, 2012, 20 pages. |
Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/953,742, mailed Oct. 26, 2011, 19 pages. |
Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 11/953,751, mailed Dec. 7, 2011, 12 pages. |
Supplemental Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 11/953,751, mailed Dec. 27, 2011, 6 pages. |
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/668,322, mailed Aug. 30, 2011, 17 pages. |
Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 11/668,322, mailed Feb. 10, 2012, 20 pages. |
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/745,008, mailed Sep. 14, 2011, 26 pages. |
Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 12/795,492, mailed Nov. 14, 2011, 10 pages. |
Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 12/198,697, mailed Nov. 28, 2011, 12 pages. |
Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 12/198,697, mailed Jan. 5, 2012, 4 pages. |
Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/198,710, mailed Oct. 19, 2011, 58 pages. |
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/083,481, mailed Dec. 1, 2011, 7 pages. |
Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/070,893, mailed Sep. 21, 2011, 12 pages. |
Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 12/466,277, mailed Nov. 2, 2011, 47 pages. |
Gupta et al., “Packet Classification on Multiple Fields,” SiGCOMM '99, Aug. 1999, pp. 147-160, ACM, Cambridge, MA. |
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/880,518 mailed Oct. 30, 2012, 7 pages. |
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/198,710 mailed Sep. 13, 2012, 18 pages. |
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/083,481 mailed Oct. 4, 2012, 9 pages. |
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/398,725 mailed on Nov. 28, 2012, 10 pages. |
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/152,715 mailed on Nov. 13, 2012, 6 pages. |
Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/900,279 mailed on Dec. 5, 2012, 8 pages. |
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/083,481 mailed on Mar. 1, 2013, 14 pages. |
Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/198,710 mailed on Mar. 21, 2013, 17 pages. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20090279549 A1 | Nov 2009 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60762283 | Jan 2006 | US | |
60754932 | Dec 2005 | US |