The field of the present invention generally relates to hockey sticks including hockey stick configurations, manufacture and component structures and combinations thereof.
Generally, hockey sticks are comprised of a blade portion and an elongated shaft portion. Traditionally, each portion was constructed of wood (e.g., solid wood, wood laminates) and attached together at a permanent joint. The joint generally comprised a slot formed by two opposing sides of the lower end section of the shaft with the slot opening on the forward facing surface of the shaft. As used in this application “forward facing surface of the shaft” means the surface of the shaft that faces generally toward the tip of the blade and is generally perpendicular to the longitudinal length of the blade at the point of attachment. The heel of the blade comprised a recessed portion dimensioned to be receivable within the slot. Upon insertion of the blade into the slot, the opposing sides of the shaft that form the slot overlap the recessed portion of the blade at the heel. The joint was made permanent by application of a suitable bonding material or glue between the shaft and the blade. In addition, the joint was oftentimes further strengthened by an overlay of fiberglass material.
Traditional wood hockey stick constructions, however, are expensive to manufacture due to the cost of suitable wood and the manufacturing processes employed. In addition, due to the wood construction, the weight may be considerable. Moreover, wood sticks lacked durability, often due to fractures in the blade, thus requiring frequent replacement. Furthermore, due to the variables relating to wood construction and manufacturing techniques, wood sticks were often difficult to manufacture to consistent tolerances. For example, the curve and flex of the blade often varied even within the same model and brand of stick. Consequently, a player after becoming accustomed to a particular wood stick was often without a comfortably seamless replacement when the stick was no longer in a useable condition.
Notwithstanding, the “feel” of traditional wood-constructed hockey sticks was found desirable by many players. The “feel” of a hockey stick can vary depending on a myriad of objective and subjective factors including the type of construction materials employed, the structure of the components, the dimensions of the components, the rigidity or bending stiffness of the shaft and/or blade, the weight and balance of the shaft and/or blade, the rigidity and strength of the joint(s) connecting the shaft to the blade, the curvature of the blade, the sound that is made when the blade strikes the puck, etc. Experienced players and the public are often inclined to use hockey sticks that have a “feel” that is comfortable yet provides the desired performance. Moreover, the subjective nature inherent in this decision often results in one hockey player preferring a certain “feel” of a particular hockey stick while another hockey player prefers the “feel” of another hockey stick.
Perhaps due to the deficiencies relating to traditional wood hockey stick constructions, contemporary hockey stick design veered away from the traditional permanently attached blade configuration toward a replaceable blade and shaft configuration, wherein the blade portion was configured to include a connection member, often referred to as a “tennon”, “shank” or “hosel”, which generally comprised of an upward extension of the blade from the heel. The shafts of these contemporary designs generally were configured to include a four-sided tubular member having a connection portion comprising a socket (e.g., the hollow at the end of the tubular shaft) appropriately configured or otherwise dimensioned so that it may slidably and snugly receive the connection member of the blade. Hence, the resulting joint generally comprised a four-plane lap joint. In order to facilitate the detachable connection between the blade and the shaft and to further strengthen the integrity of the joint, a suitable bonding material or glue is typically employed. Notable in these contemporary replaceable blade and shaft configurations is that the point of attachment between the blade and the shaft is substantially elevated relative to the heel attachment employed in traditional wood type constructions.
Although over the years, metallic materials such as aluminum were employed to form tubular shafts adapted to being joined to replaceable blades in the manner described above; in more recent years the hockey stick industry has tended to make more and more hockey stick shafts from composite materials. Such shafts, for example, have been manufactured via pulltrusion or by wrapping layers of composite fibers over a mandrel and then curing so that the fibers reside in a hardened resin matrix. Although, composite hockey stick shafts are much appreciated by players for their performance attributes, applicants have found that they tend to transmit undesirable vibration more efficiently to the player's hands than did traditional wood constructed hockey sticks.
Contemporary replaceable blades, of the type discussed above, are constructed of various materials including wood, wood laminates, wood laminate overlain with fiberglass, and what is often referred to in the industry as “composite” constructions. Such composite blade constructions employ what is generally referred to as a structural sandwich construction, which comprises a low-density rigid core faced on generally opposed front and back facing surfaces with a thin, high strength, skin or facing. The skin or facing is typically comprised of plies of woven and substantially continuous fibers, such as carbon, glass, graphite, or Kevlar™ disposed within a hardened matrix resin material. Of particular importance in this type of construction is that the core is strongly or firmly attached to the facings and is formed of a material composition that, when so attached, rigidly holds and separates the opposing faces. The improvement in strength and stiffness, relative to the weight of the structure, that is achievable by virtue of such structural sandwich constructions has found wide appeal in the industry and is widely employed by hockey stick blade manufacturers.
Contemporary composite blades are typically manufactured by employment of a resin transfer molding (RTM) process, which generally involves the following steps. First, a plurality of inner core elements composed of compressed foam, such as those made of polyurethane, are individually and together inserted into one or more woven-fiber sleeves to form an uncured blade assembly. The uncured blade assembly, including the hosel or connection member, is then inserted into a mold having the desired exterior shape of the blade. After the mold is sealed, a suitable matrix material or resin is injected into the mold to impregnate the woven-fiber sleeves. The blade assembly is then cured for a requisite time and temperature, removed from the mold, and finished. The curing of the resin serves to encapsulate the fibers within a rigid surface layer and hence facilitates the transfer of load among the fibers, thereby improving the strength of the surface layer. In addition, the curing process serves to attach the rigid foam core to the opposing faces of the blade to create—at least initially—the rigid structural sandwich construction.
Experience has shown that considerable manufacturing costs are expended on the woven-fiber sleeve materials themselves, and in impregnating those fiber sleeves with resin while the uncured blade assembly is in the mold. Moreover, the process of managing resin flow to impregnate the various fiber sleeves, has been found to, represent a potential source of manufacturing inconsistency. In addition, as was the case with composite shaft constructs, such composite blade constructs tend to transmit undesirable vibrations to the player's hands, especially when coupled to a composite shaft. In this regard, commonly owned U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/439,652 filed on May 15, 2003, hereby incorporated by reference, teaches a hockey stick construction comprising a composite blade construct having one or more core elements formed of a resilient elastomer material (e.g., rubber) which may serve to dampen vibration, while also providing desirable performance attributes.
Composite shafts and blades, nonetheless, are thought to have certain advantages over wood shafts and blade. For example, composite blades and shafts may be more readily manufactured to consistent tolerances and are generally more durable than their wood counterparts. In addition, such composite constructs are capable of providing improved strength and hence may be made lighter.
Notwithstanding, such constructions nevertheless also have been found by applicants to produce a “feel” and/or performance attributes (e.g., vibration, sound, flex) that are unappealing to some players. Even players that choose to play with composite hockey sticks continually seek out alternative sticks having improved feel or performance. Moreover, despite the advent of contemporary composite hockey stick constructions and two-piece replaceable blade-shaft configurations, traditional wood-constructed hockey sticks are still preferred by many players notwithstanding the drawbacks noted above. In an on going effort to improve the state of the technology, applicants disclose unique composite hockey stick configurations and constructions that may overcome one or more of these deficiencies.
The present invention relates to hockey sticks, their manufacture, configuration and component structures. Various aspects are set forth below.
In one aspect, a hockey stick comprises a tubular hollow rectangular shaft having an outer layer and inner layer formed of composite molded around an elastomer middle layer. The elastomer middle layer may be positioned any where along the longitudinal length of the shaft, however, it is contemplated that the elastomer layer be configured reside nearer the blade of the hockey stick within preferred positions described herein. Similarly, although it contemplated that the elastomer middle layer form at least a portion of each of the four walls that comprise the rectangular shaft, the middle elastomer layer may form any one of the four walls or all of the four walls or any combination of one or more of the four walls.
In another aspect, a method for manufacturing a composite hockey stick blade is disclosed comprising (a) providing a cured tubular shaft, such as the one previously set forth above, (b) providing an un-cured composite blade comprising one or more core elements wrapped with one or plies of fibers dimensioned to receive the lower portion of the hockey stick shaft, (c) inserting the cured shaft into the un-cured hockey stick blade, and (d) curing the composite blade around the cured hockey stick shaft.
Additional implementations, features, variations, and advantageous of the invention will be set forth in the description that follows, and will be further evident from the illustrations set forth in the accompanying drawings.
The accompanying drawings illustrate presently contemplated embodiments and constructions of the invention and, together with the description, serve to explain various principles of the invention.
FIGS. 16A-C are flow charts detailing preferred steps for manufacturing the hockey stick illustrated in
The preferred embodiments will now be described with reference to the drawings. To facilitate description, any reference numeral designating an element in one figure will designate the same element if used in any other figure. The following description of the preferred embodiments is only exemplary. The present invention(s) is not limited to these embodiments, but may be realized by other implementations. Furthermore, in describing preferred embodiments, specific terminology is resorted to for the sake of clarity. However, the invention is not intended to be limited to the specific terms so selected, and it is to be understood that each specific term includes all equivalents.
The shaft 20 comprises an upper section 40, a mid-section 50, and a lower section 60, which is adapted to being interposed or joined within the slot 145 located in the heel section 140 of the blade 30 between the front face wall 90 and back face wall 100 of the blade 30. In the preferred embodiment, illustrated in the drawings, the shaft 20 is generally rectangular in cross-section with two wide opposed walls 150 and 160 and two narrow opposed walls 170 and 180. Narrow wall 170 includes a forward-facing surface 190 and narrow wall 180 includes a rearward-facing surface 200. The forward-facing surface 190 faces generally toward the tip section 130 of the blade 30 and is generally perpendicular to the longitudinal length of the blade 30 (i.e., the length between the heel section 140 and the tip section 130). The rearward-facing surface 200 faces generally away from the tip section 130 of the blade 30 and is also generally perpendicular to the longitudinal length of the blade 30. Wide wall 150 includes a front-facing surface 210 and wide wall 160 includes a back-facing surface 220. When the shaft 20 is attached to the blade 30 as illustrated in
In the preferred embodiment, the shaft 20 includes a tapered section 330 (best illustrated in
Hence, the heel section 140 of the blade 30 includes an open-ended slot 145 that is dimensioned to receive the lower portion of the tapered section 330 of the shaft 20 having a reduced width. Corresponding and opposed shoulders 280 and 290 in the shaft 20 and blade 30 configured to reside at the transition there between facilitate the transition between the shaft 20 and the blade 30. Hence, when the shaft 20 is inserted into the slot 145 of the blade 30, shoulders 280 and 290 are configured to be in opposed alignment so that they may abut with one another.
An exemplary hockey stick shaft lay-up for the inner and outer layers 410 and 430 are set forth in the tables below:
Hence in a preferred construction of the shaft 20, the inner layer 410 comprises eighteen (18) plies of parallel fibers; whereas the outer layer 430 comprises only five (5) plies of parallel fibers. Hence the outer layer 430 is on the order of approximately ¼ to ⅓ the thickness of the inner layer 410 or in other words the inner layer 410 is three to four times thicker than the outer layer 430. Furthermore, it is noted that the outer most ply of the outer layer 430 is woven.
Although carbon and aramid (such as Kevlar™ manufactured by Dupont Corporation) fibers are employed in the foregoing representative lay-ups of the outer and/or inner layers 430 and 410 of the shaft 20, it is to be understood that other fibers or filaments may be employed. Thus for example, it is contemplated that in addition to carbon and aramid fibers, fibers made of glass, polyethylene (such as Spectra™ manufactured by Allied Signal Corporation), ceramic (such as Nextel™ manufactured by 3m Corporation), boron, quartz, polyester or any other fiber that may provide the desired strength may be employed. Preferably, at least part of one of the fibers is selected from the group consisting of carbon fiber, aramid, glass, polyethylene, ceramic, boron, quartz, and polyester; even more preferably from the group consisting of carbon fiber, aramid, glass, polyethylene, ceramic, boron, and quartz; yet even more preferably from the group consisting of carbon fiber, aramid, glass, polyethylene, ceramic, and boron; yet even more preferably from the group consisting of carbon fiber, aramid, glass, polyethylene, and ceramic; yet even more preferably from the group consisting of carbon fiber, aramid, glass, and polyethylene; yet even more preferably from the group consisting of carbon fiber, aramid, and glass; yet even more preferably from the group consisting of carbon fiber and aramid; and most preferably comprises carbon fiber.
It has been found preferable, as can be surmised from the foregoing tables, that it is preferable for the lay-up of the shaft to include groups of parallel fibers oriented in different directions. Hence, for example the plurality of plies that form inner layer 410 include plies having uni-directional fibers oriented in a first direction and plies having uni-directional fibers oriented in a second direction that is different than the first.
The matrix or resin-based material in which the fibers are disposed may be selected from a group including: (1) thermoplastics such as polyether-ketone, polyphenylene sulfide, polyethylene, polypropylene, urethanes (thermoplastic), and Nylon-6, and (2) thermosets such as urethanes (thermosetting), epoxy, vinyl ester, polycyanate, and polyester. In the preferred construction set forth above thermoset resins have been satisfactorily employed.
In addition, it has been found preferable that the plies of fibers be pre-impregnated with a resin prior to being layered over one another and the mandrel. By so doing, it has been found that the lay-up of the plies is facilitated in that each ply is capable of acting as a tape and adhering to the preceding ply and hence may serve to facilitate the fixing of the relative position of the pre-cured plies to on another. In this regard, suitable materials include: (a) unidirectional carbon fiber tape pre-impregnated with epoxy, manufactured by Hexcel Corporation of Salt Lake City, Utah, and also S & P Systems of San Diego, Calif., (b) uni-directional glass fiber tape pre-impregnated with epoxy, also manufactured by Hexcel Corporation, (c) unidirectional Kevlar™ fiber tape pre-impregnated with epoxy, also manufactured by Hexcel Corporation, (d) 0/90 woven Kevlar™ fiber tape pre-impregnated with epoxy, also manufactured by Hexcel Corporation, and (e) 0/90 woven carbon tape pre-impregnated with epoxy, also manufactured by Hexcel corporation.
With respect to the middle elastomer layer, the term “elastomer” or “elastomeric”, as used herein, is defined as, or refers to, a material having properties similar to those of vulcanized natural rubber, namely, the ability to be stretched to at least approximately twice its original length and to retract rapidly to approximately its original length when released. Hence, materials that fall within the definition of “elastomeric” as used and described herein include materials that have an ultimate elongation equal to or greater than 100% in accordance with the following formula:
Ultimate Elongation Percentage={[(final length at rupture)−(original length)]÷[original length]}×100 (1)
Such elastomer materials may include: (1) vulcanized natural rubber; (2) synthetic thermosetting high polymers such as styrene-butadiene copolymer, polychloroprene(neoprene), nitrile rubber, butyl rubber, polysulfide rubber (“Thiokol”), cis-1,4-polyisoprene, ethylene-propylene terpolymers (EPDM rubber), silicone rubber, and polyurethane rubber, which can be cross-linked with sulfur, peroxides, or similar agents to control elasticity characteristics; and (3) Thermoplastic elastomers including polyolefins or TPO rubbers, polyester elastomers such as those marketed under the trade name “Hytrel” by E. I. Du Pont; ionomer resins such as those marketed under the trade name “Surlyn” by E. I. Du Pont, and cyclic monomer elastomers such as di-cyclo pentadiene (DCPD).
In addition, one criteria for assessing the appropriateness of an elastomer is its ability to be molded to the materials that form the inner and outer layers between which it is disposed. In the exemplary hockey shaft construction described above, it has been found that the following exemplary elastomer is capable of being employed successfully:
Notably, applicants have found that the employment of intermediate elastomer layer in a composite hockey stick shaft may impact or dampen the vibration typically produced from such shafts and thereby provides a means for controlling or tuning the vibration to produce or more desirable feel.
The middle elastomer layer 420 may extend the full longitudinal length of the shaft 20 and/or on each of the four side walls (i.e. wide walls 150 and 160 and narrow walls 170 and 180) of the shaft 20 at any given cross-section of the shaft 20. It is contemplated, however, that the middle elastomer layer 420 may extend only along one or more discrete longitudinal portions of the shaft 20 and/or one or more discrete wall regions of the shaft 20.
Hence it is contemplated that the middle elastomer layer 410 may form any portion of a wall of the shaft 20 without necessary forming any other portion or wall of the shaft. Thus, for example, it is contemplated that middle elastomer layer 410 may, at any given cross-section of the shaft 20, form: (a) wide wall 150 and not wide wall 160 and/or narrow walls 170 and 180, (b) narrow wall 170 and not narrow wall 180 and/or wide walls 150 and 160, (c) narrow wall 170 and wide wall 150 but not narrow wall 180 nor wide wall 160, (d) narrow wall 170 and 180 but not wide walls 150 and 160, (e) wide walls 150 and 160 but not narrow walls 170 and 180, and (f) narrow wall 180 and wide wall 150 but not narrow wall 170 nor wide wall 160.
With respect to the longitudinal positioning of the middle elastomer layer reference is made to
After the initial blade pre-form is formed a spacer element 470 is butted up against the rear of the initial blade pre-form such that the spacer element is positioned to occupy the heel region of the blade and additional plies of fibers overlain to form a secondary blade pre-form (Step 635). The spacer element 470 is dimensioned to generally correspond to the outer dimensions of the lower regions of the shaft 20 configured to mate with the blade. The spacer element 470 is then removed from the secondary blade pre-form (step 640).
While there has been illustrated and described what are presently considered to be preferred embodiments and features of the present invention, it will be understood by those skilled in the art that various changes and modifications may be made, and equivalents may be substituted for elements thereof, without departing from the scope of the invention. For example, it is contemplated that the composite hockey stick shaft having a middle elastomer layer 420 disclosed and taught herein be employed in hockey stick shaft configurations disclosed and taught in co-pending and owned U.S. patent Ser. No. 10/439,652 filed on May 15, 2003. In addition, it is contemplated, for example, that the composite hockey stick shaft having a middle elastomer layer 420 disclosed and taught herein be employed in hockey sticks having the composite blade structures disclosed and taught in co-pending and owned U.S. patent Ser. No. 10/439,652 filed on May 15, 2003.
In addition, many modifications may be made to adapt a particular element, feature or implementation to the teachings of the present invention without departing from the central scope of the invention. Therefore, it is intended that this invention not be limited to the particular embodiments disclosed herein, but that the invention include all embodiments falling within the scope of the appended claims. In addition, it is to be understood that various aspects of the teachings and principles disclosed herein relate configuration of the blades and hockey sticks and component elements thereof. Other aspects of the teachings and principles disclosed herein relate to internal constructions of the component elements and the materials employed in their construction. Yet other aspects of the teachings and principles disclosed herein relate to the combination of configuration, internal construction and materials employed therefor. The combination of one, more than one, or the totality of these aspects defines the scope of the invention disclosed herein. No other limitations are placed on the scope of the invention set forth in this disclosure. Accordingly, the invention or inventions disclosed herein are only limited by the scope of this disclosure that supports or otherwise provides a basis, either inherently or expressly, for patentability over the prior art. Thus, it is contemplated that various component elements, teachings and principles disclosed herein provide multiple independent basis for patentability. Hence no restriction should be placed on any patentable elements, teachings, or principles disclosed herein or combinations thereof, other than those that exist in the prior art or can under applicable law be combined from the teachings in the prior art to defeat patentability.
This application is a divisional of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/689,545 filed Oct. 20, 2003, now pending, which is a continuation-in-part of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/439,652 filed May 15, 2003, now pending, the disclosures of which are hereby incorporated by reference.
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 10689545 | Oct 2003 | US |
Child | 11820462 | Jun 2007 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 10439652 | May 2003 | US |
Child | 10689545 | Oct 2003 | US |