The present invention relates to a hoisting device comprising a hoisting cable, a winch, a crown block and a traveling bottom block provided with a load attachment device, wherein both the crown block and the traveling bottom block comprise one or more sheaves having an essentially horizontally extending rotation shaft about which sheaves the hoisting cable is reeved; wherein at least some of the traveling bottom block sheaves are associated with a releasable connector, and are thereby detachable from the load attachment device and displaceable to an inoperative position.
Such hoisting devices are known from the prior art. These hoisting devices are for example used in the offshore industry as drilling derricks on, for example, drilling vessels. Alternatively, these hoisting devices are known to be used in marine pipe laying systems for laying of an offshore pipeline.
Such a system is known e.g. from EP 1 433 922 from the same applicant. The application of such detachable traveling bottom block sheaves enables optimization between speed and power.
The object of the present invention is to provide an improved hoisting device. This object is achieved by a hoisting device characterized in that the rotation shaft of multiple traveling bottom block sheaves and multiple crown block sheaves is essentially perpendicular to the rotation shaft of remaining multiple traveling bottom block sheaves and remaining multiple crown block sheaves.
The effect of such an orientation of the sheaves is that a horizontal longitudinal dimension of the traveling bottom block is reduced. Possibly, but not necessarily, this is accompanied by an enlargement of the perpendicular latitudinal horizontal dimension.
The sheaves of the traveling bottom block are conventionally arranged such that their rotation shaft is essentially parallel to the longitudinal axis of the traveling bottom block. With the sheaves arranged next to each other, the width of the traveling bottom block is similar to the diameter of a sheave and the length of the traveling bottom block is determined by the number of sheaves. Thus, the more sheaves, the larger the longitudinal dimension of the traveling bottom block. The larger the load to be lifted, the more sheaves are required, and thus the larger the longitudinal dimension of the traveling bottom block. In general, the maximum number of sheaves is determined by the maximum load that the derrick will encounter. However this maximum load is only a very limited time needed during operation. Each sheave adds to the fatigue of the hoisting cable and decreases the total efficiency of the system.
As will be further explained below, the application of detachable traveling bottom block sheaves enables optimization between speed and power, and thus tries to minimize this effect by making it possible to choose the optimal reeving for the load encountered. This is advantageous in many operations. Set-ups having between 2 and 10 detachable traveling bottom blocks are quite common. In general, 10-80% of the traveling bottom block sheaves are detachable. Among the advantages of detachable traveling bottom block sheaves are:
A disadvantage of detachable traveling bottom block sheaves is that the width increases. Non-detachable traveling bottom block sheaves can be positioned more close to each other, as no space for removal is required and supports for the sheaves may be shared by two sheaves. Each detachable sheave requires its own supports on either side of the sheave. Thus, the application of detachable sheaves is advantageous, but enlarges the longitudinal dimension of the traveling bottom block.
Once the width of a set of sheaves positioned next to one another exceeds the diameter of the sheaves, it may be beneficial to rotate the set of sheaves to position the horizontally extending rotation shaft perpendicular to the original position of the horizontally extending rotation shaft. As such, the longitudinal dimension of the traveling bottom block is decreased. Reorientation of the sheaves as such does not change the weight of the traveling bottom block.
In particular when a large number of traveling bottom block sheaves is desired, in general in cases where heavy loads are to be lifted and a large number of falls (wire parts extending between the crown block and the traveling bottom block) is desired, it is advantageous to optimize the orientation of the traveling bottom block sheaves according to the present invention. This is in particular beneficial when the traveling bottom block is to be moveable within a structure, such as the crown support structure, such as a tower, pipelay crane, mast or derrick etc. When only a side-by-side arrangement of the sheaves is possible, the number of sheaves is limited by the dimension of the structure in which the traveling bottom block is moveable. Thus, the amount of falls and the maximum load to be lifted is limited by the dimension of the structure. With the arrangement according to the invention, a larger number of sheaves may be positioned in the traveling bottom, block, as multiple of them are arranged perpendicular to the others. A larger number of falls decreases the hoisting cable speed and diminishes hoisting wire damage, and enables larger loads to be lifted.
Making use of both horizontal dimensions also enables the positioning of more sheaves in the vicinity of the point of gravity of the traveling bottom block. It is possible to position more sheaves in the vicinity of the load. As a result of this orientation, a lighter overall weight of the traveling block may be allowable, which is beneficial for the hoisting device.
Preferably, the traveling bottom block sheaves having essentially perpendicular rotation shafts are arranged symmetrically in the traveling bottom block. Even more preferably, the crown block sheaves having essentially perpendicular rotation shafts are also arranged symmetrically in the crown block. Symmetric arrangements within a block ensure stability of the block and the hoist to be loaded with the block.
Positioning multiple crown block sheaves also essentially perpendicular to the rotation shaft of remaining multiple crown block sheaves enables an essentially analogous orientation of the sheaves in the crown block and the traveling bottom block. As such, entanglement of the hoisting cable is prevented. Also, the hoisting cable parts extend as vertical as possible, which is beneficial for the lifetime of the hoisting cable as wear is minimize in such an orientation.
To minimize wear, it is beneficial to position the shafts of the sheaves having essentially parallel rotation shafts with a very small angle (a few degrees maximum) with respect to the horizontal, and/or with respect to each other. Preferably, the essentially parallel traveling bottom block sheave shafts are positioned at small angles, but alternatively it is also possible to position the essentially parallel crown block sheave shafts at small angles. This prevents the hoisting wire to leave the sheave groove at an angle.
Yet another advantage of the hoisting device according to the invention is that the variation in number of traveling bottom block sheaves is enlarged. As a symmetrical traveling bottom block is desired to hoist loads, conventionally two detachable sheaves had to be detached at the same time, resulting in a loss of 4 falls. Thus, the number of falls could only be changed in steps of 4 falls less or more. With the hoisting device according to the present invention, it is possible to detach one sheave at the time, still maintaining a stable and essentially symmetrical traveling bottom block. As such, the number of falls is changeable in steps of 2 falls less or more. It is conceivable to provide the traveling bottom block with only detachable sheaves, or with a mixture of detachable and non-detachable sheaves.
Any arrangement of the traveling bottom block sheaves is possible. It is conceivable to position the shafts of the detachable sheaves perpendicular to the shafts of the non-detachable sheaves (if any), in which it is possible to position the shafts of the non-detachable sheaves parallel to the longitudinal direction of the traveling bottom block, or, on the contrary, to position the shafts of the detachable sheaves parallel to the longitudinal direction of the traveling bottom block. Of course, it is also possible to position the shafts of a set of detachable sheaves perpendicular to the remaining detachable sheaves, and/or to position the shafts of a set of non-detachable sheaves perpendicular to the remaining non-detachable sheaves.
It is possible to position the shafts of all traveling bottom block sheaves in essentially the same horizontal plane, or position them in a staggered way. For example, the shafts of the detachable sheaves may be positioned at a more elevated position than the shafts of the non-detachable sheaves.
In a preferred arrangement of the traveling bottom block, the traveling bottom block sheaves are arranged such that a set of sheaves having a rotation shaft essentially perpendicular to the longitudinal axis of the traveling block is positioned in the middle of the traveling bottom block, above the load attachment device, flanked by two sets of sheaves having a rotation shaft essentially parallel to the longitudinal axis of the traveling block. In an alternative preferred embodiment, the traveling bottom block sheaves may be arranged such that a set of sheaves having a rotation shaft essentially perpendicular to the longitudinal axis of the traveling block is positioned in the middle of the traveling bottom block, above the load attachment device and above a set of sheaves having a rotation shaft essentially parallel to the longitudinal axis of the traveling block.
In a preferred embodiment, the hoisting device comprises between two and twelve detachable traveling bottom block sheaves, of which the rotation shaft is essentially perpendicular to the rotation shaft of the remaining two to twelve traveling bottom block sheaves.
As indicated above, the application of detachable traveling bottom block sheaves enables optimization between speed and power. This now explained.
The hoisting cable is reeved in such a way about the crown block sheaves and the traveling bottom block sheaves that multiple cable parts extend between the crown block and the traveling bottom block. The more cable parts are present between the crown block and the traveling bottom block, the greater will be the load that can be hoisted with the hoisting device, if the hoisting winch remains unchanged. However, in this case the more cable parts are present between the crown block and the traveling bottom block, the lower will be the speed at which the traveling bottom block is moveable with the same winch speed, and thus the speed with which the load is hoisted is lower.
In order to find a good compromise between speed and lifting power, it is generally decided to provide de hoisting device with relatively heavy winches. The heavy winches ensure that the requirement of being able to move the traveling bottom block up and down rapidly can be met in every case. However, that also means that a substantial part of the lifting power is not being utilized for a substantial part of the time. This problem is solved by the provision of detachable traveling bottom block sheaves.
These detachable traveling bottom block sheaves are displaceable from an operative position in which the sheaves are connected to the traveling bottom block, to an inoperative position. Preferably, the displaceable sheave is locked in the inoperative position. The inoperative position is preferably located between the traveling bottom block and the crown block. In the inoperative position the detachable sheave may e.g. be locked to a crown block sheave, but alternatively to a support structure supporting the crown block.
The effect of this measure is that the number of wire parts between the crown block and the traveling bottom block can be set as desired. When locking the detachable sheaves in the elevated inactive position, less wire parts will extend between the crown block and the traveling bottom block, and a relatively low weight can be hoisted. When the detachable blocks are attached to the traveling bottom block in the operative position, a relatively large number of wire parts will extend between the crown block and the traveling bottom block, and the traveling bottom block can be moved at a relatively low speed relative to the crown block. Since the hoisting cable is reeved about the sheaves and the sheaves can be attached as desired in the active or the inactive position, the hoisting cable does not have to be reeved again. That means that the desired number of wire parts can be set in a relatively short time.
For example, drilling operations may require a maximum load of over 1100 metric tons for certain operations, such as handling a casing string or BOP handling. In 95% of the hoisting operations, however, the load to be hoisted is only 400-600 tons. Without detachable traveling bottom block sheaves, this would result in extreme hoisting cable speeds when hoisting loads with less weight. The speed may be such high that the hoisting cable starts slipping in the sheaves. Preferably, the load attachment means are adapted to support between 100 metric tons and 1250 metric tons. Load attachment means adapted to support even higher loads are also conceivable.
The hoisting device according to the invention may be a conventional crane, e.g. suitable to be positioned on a vessel. Alternatively, the hoisting device may be part of a mast, derrick or multipurpose tower as commercially available by the applicant, e.g. for offshore or onshore purposes, e.g. a drilling derrick. Yet alternatively, the hoisting device may be part of pipelay equipment, such as a J-lay tower. As such, the hoisting device may be positioned on a vessel or alternatively on the mainland. The hoisting device comprises a crown block, which is supported by crown block support structure. In the examples indicated above, the crane, mast or derrick respectively are suitable to support the crown block at an elevated position relative to the traveling bottom block. The traveling bottom block may be allowed to move within the crown block support structure.
The traveling bottom block is provided with a load attachment device, which may be e.g. a hook or lifting slings, but may also be a traveling clamp for holding a pipe section to be connected to a pipeline as well as for lowering the pipe line after the pipe section is connected to the pipeline. Preferably, the hoisting device is a drilling derrick, and the load attachment device is suitable to attach a casing string and/or a BOP and/or a riser and/or an X-mas tree.
The traveling bottom block is moveable between a lower position and an elevated position, and as such also the load is moveable between a lower position and an elevated position. In the most elevated position, the traveling bottom block is close to the crown block. The lowest position may be when the traveling bottom block is connectable to the load, or when the traveling bottom block is in contact with the deck of the vessel or the mainland or any other support, supporting the hoisting device.
The hoisting device comprises at least a hoisting cable and a winch. When using a single winch drum, the other end of the hoisting cable is anchored. In a preferred embodiment, the hoisting device comprises two winches, each end of a single hoisting cable being wound onto a separate winch. It is convenient to place both winches close to each other in view of controls, power etc. The winch or winches may be connected to the crown block support structure, such as a crane, mast or derrick, or alternatively to a support for the hoisting device (deck of a vessel, ground of the mainland). Some of the advantages using two winches are:
In a preferred embodiment when using two winches the detachable blocks are in the stationary (middle) part of the wire.
The hoisting device according to the present invention is preferably provided with heave compensation. It has been noted that a hoisting device with detached bottom block sheaves, and thus less sheaves when not needed, according to the present invention reduces the resistance of the hoisting cable. Therefore, operation of the passive heave compensators is more accurate and improved (less tension variations).
The detachable traveling bottom block sheaves are associated with a releasable connector. Such a connector may e.g. be supported by a sheave support in which the sheave with its shaft is supported. A single releasable connector may be provided to connect the detachable sheave to the traveling bottom block and to lock the detachable sheave in the inactive position.
Alternatively, more preferably, separate connectors are provided for these purposes. To connect the detachable sheave to the traveling bottom block, the sheaves may e.g. be associated with a lock or hook, which interacts with a lug or pin on the traveling bottom block. The sheaves can be fixed on the traveling bottom block as desired. Since there will always be a certain tension on the hoisting cable, the detachable sheaves are pulled automatically in the direction of the crown block. For that reason, fastening means can be dispensed with on the top side of the sheaves. In preferred embodiments, the detachable sheave is provided with a safety facility, to prevent falling downwards of the detachable sheave by the force of gravity if the tension is lost completely. To lock the detachable sheave in the inoperative position, the sheave may e.g. be associated with connector means to connect the detachable sheave to the crown block support structure.
Alternatively, the detachable sheave is associated with connector means to connect the detachable sheave to a crown block sheave.
In a preferred embodiment, the hoisting device is provided on a vessel. Such a hoisting device is preferably further provided with one or more compensators for damping movements of the vessel, e.g. as a result of heave and beating of the waves. Preferably, in such a hoisting device the hoisting cable is guided over a compensator block which is connected to an end of the compensator, in such a manner that with the aid of the compensator it is possible to exert force on the hoisting cable. The other end of the compensator can be fastened in a fixed position, e.g. to the deck of the vessel or connected to a crown block support structure. Such a compensator may for example be in the form of a pneumatic or hydraulic cylinder. A preferred location for the cylinders when using two hoisting winches is in the stationary part of the hoisting cable.
The cylinders may also serve as overload/underload protection. By fully extending one cylinder and fully retracting the other it may be prevented that the maximum line tension is exceeded, and the minimum line tension likewise. When the line tension drops below a minimum, the fully extended cylinder is allowed to retract and thus, with a relatively low pressure, exerts additional tension to the line and thereby prevents very low line tensions when an underload is to be lifted. On the other hand, when the line tension is above a maximum as a result of an overload being lifted, the fully retracted cylinder is allowed to extend and thus, with a relatively high pressure, cause a reduced tension in the line and thereby prevents very high line tensions when an overload is to be lifted.
The invention is further explained with reference to the drawing, in which:
a and 2b are perspective views of a relative portion of a hoisting device according to the present invention, corresponding to the schematic representation of
In
The hoisting device 10 further comprises an elevated crown block 5 comprising multiple sheaves 10a, 10b, 11a, 11b, 11c, 11d, 12a, 12b, 13a, 13b, 13c, 13d, 14a, 14b, 15a, 15b, 16a, 16b, 16c. According to the invention, multiple crown block sheaves 16a, 16b, 16c have a horizontally extending rotation shaft 26 essentially perpendicular to the rotation shafts 20; 21; 22a; 22b; 24; 25 of the remaining multiple crown block sheaves 10a, 10b; 11a, 11b, 11c, 11d, 13a, 13b, 13c, 13d; 12a; 12b; 14a, 14b; 15a, 15b respectively. It is noted that the ends of the shafts are visible in
The hoisting device 10 further comprises a low-lying traveling bottom block comprising multiple sheaves 31a, 31b, 32a, 32b, 32c, 32d, 33a, 33b, 33c, 33d. Some of these traveling bottom block sheaves 31a, 31b, 33a, 33b, 33c, 33d are associated with a releasable connector (not visible in
According to the invention, multiple bottom block sheaves 33a, 33b, 33c, 33d, have a horizontally extending rotation shaft 43 essentially perpendicular to the rotation shafts 41; 42 of the remaining multiple crown block sheaves 31a, 31b; 32a, 32b, 32c, 32d, respectively. Rotation shafts 41 and 41 are positioned at a small angle with respect to each other to improve the running of the hoisting line.
According to a preferred embodiment of the invention, the hoisting device 10 further comprises two compensators 51a, 51b for damping movements of the hoisting device, in particular when the hoisting device is positioned on a vessel. The hoisting cable 1 is guided over compensator blocks 52a, 52b which are connected to an end of the compensator 51a, 51b, respectively, in such a manner that with the aid of the compensator it is possible to exert force on the hoisting cable.
The reeving of the hoisting line as shown in
The detachable bottom block sheave shown in
This application is a National Phase of PCT/NL2010/000066 filed on Apr. 14, 2010, which claims priority under 35 USC 119(e) to U.S. Provisional Application No. 61/169,074 filed on Apr. 14, 2009, all of which are hereby expressly incorporated by reference into the present application.
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind | 371c Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
PCT/NL2010/000066 | 4/14/2010 | WO | 00 | 10/12/2011 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2010/120169 | 10/21/2010 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
483161 | Morgan | Sep 1892 | A |
2259253 | Kozlovskis | Oct 1941 | A |
3258249 | Williams | Jun 1966 | A |
3768664 | Bauer et al. | Oct 1973 | A |
3863898 | Brackin | Feb 1975 | A |
4010852 | Goss et al. | Mar 1977 | A |
5421468 | Wright | Jun 1995 | A |
6926103 | Roodenburg et al. | Aug 2005 | B1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
1 433 922 | Jun 2004 | EP |
WO 03062042 | Jul 2003 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20120025156 A1 | Feb 2012 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61169074 | Apr 2009 | US |