Patent Grant
9988241
The invention relates to a hoisting rope and a hoisting apparatus. Said hoisting apparatus is preferably an elevator for transporting passengers and/or goods.
Hoisting ropes typically include one or several load bearing members that are elongated in the longitudinal direction of the rope and each form a structure that continues unbroken throughout the length of the rope. Load bearing members are the members of the rope which are able to bear together the load exerted on the rope in its longitudinal direction. The load, such as a weight suspended by the rope, causes tension on the load bearing member in the longitudinal direction of the rope, which tension can be transmitted by the load bearing member in question all the way from one end of the rope to the other end of the rope. Ropes may further comprise non-bearing components, such as an elastic coating, which cannot transmit tension in the above described way. The coating can be utilized for one or more purposes. For instance, the coating can provide rope with a surface via which the rope can effectively engage frictionally with a drive wheel. The coating can also be used to provide protection for the load bearing members of the rope.
Such hoisting ropes have been suggested where the load bearing members are in the form of elongated fiber-reinforced composite members encased in polymer coating. Composite material of this kind is typically rigid in all directions and thereby also difficult to bend. In hoisting appliances, ropes typically need to be guided by rope wheels, whereby each rope goes through bending during its use. The bending is repeated constantly during the use of the hoisting appliance, whereby internal behavior of the rope during bending is an important factor in service life of the rope. As it is normally desired that the ropes have a maximally long service life, it is not recommendable to guide the rigid ropes around so small-radius rope wheels that a too sharp bending would be caused for the rope in question. Sharp bends might cause local internal stresses on the load bearing member that could be damaging for the load bearing member or at least shorten the service life of the load bearing member in long term use. One or more of the above given aspects of rope behavior in bending, among several other aspects, need to be taken into account when designing the layout of the elevator and selecting the size of the rope wheels. A drawback has been that this limits the freedom of design of the elevator. In general, the thicker the cross section of the load bearing members are, the larger the bending radius should be. Thus, the designer has been limited to a certain size range of a rope wheel when selecting a rope wheel for a given load bearing cross section.
The object of the invention is to introduce a hoisting rope, and a hoisting apparatus which is improved in terms of its behavior in bending. The object of the invention is, inter alia, to solve previously described drawbacks of known solutions and problems discussed later in the description of the invention. An object is particularly to introduce a solution whereby load bearing cross section can be large in thickness direction of the rope, in cases where the rope is to be bent around an axis extending in width direction of the rope. Improvements are presented, inter alia, which can be utilized for one or more of the following: for making the load bearing cross sectional area of a rope large in thickness direction, for making a rope bendable around smaller diameter wheels, and for making the internal structure of the rope well adaptable to stresses. Advantageous embodiments are further presented, inter alia, wherein the internal structure of the rope is able to adapt in the bending situation by ‘laminar’ movement between load bearing members next to each other.
It is brought forward a new hoisting rope for a hoisting apparatus such as an elevator, the hoisting rope having a longitudinal direction, thickness direction and width direction, and comprising a group of load bearing members made of composite material comprising reinforcing fibers embedded in polymer matrix; and a coating encasing said group of load bearing members; wherein said load bearing members extend in an untwisted manner inside the coating parallel with each other as well as with the longitudinal direction of the rope throughout the length thereof, said load bearing members being substantially larger in width direction than in thickness direction of the rope and stacked against each other in thickness direction of the rope. With this structure, one or more of the advantages/objects of the invention are achieved. In particular, there being load bearing members stacked against each other in thickness direction of the rope, the load bearing cross sectional area of the rope can be large in thickness direction of the rope without challenges with internal stresses. This is, because thanks to the stacked structure, the load bearing cross section is divided into load bearing layers which are on top of each other in thickness direction. The thickness of each of the load bearing members is smaller than the overall thickness of the stacked load bearing members. Thereby, internal stresses are divided into a plurality of separate load bearing members instead e.g. of one larger load bearing member, which provides an interface between each pair of load bearing members next to each other in thickness direction of the rope where internal stresses are at least to some amount released.
In a preferred embodiment, the number of load bearing members in said group is at least 2. Preferably, the number is then less than 10. With small number of load bearing members in the group G, a considerable addition for the thickness of the load bearing cross section is obtained with simple structure. When the number of load bearing in said group is in the range of at least 2 less than 10, most preferably but not necessarily, the thickness of each individual load bearing member is within range 0.5-4 mm and their combined thickness is between 1 to 20 mm.
In a preferred embodiment, the number of load bearing members in said group is 2. Thereby, with minimal number of stacked load bearing members, and thereby with simple structure, a great effect is obtained. In another preferred embodiment, the number of load bearing members in said group is 3 whereby with simple structure a great effect is also obtained.
In a preferred embodiment, the rope is substantially larger in its width direction than in its thickness direction. The width/thickness—ratio of the rope is preferably at least 2. Thus, the attitude of the rope, and the bending direction thereof, can be reliably controlled.
In a preferred embodiment, width/thickness—ratio of the load bearing members is at least 2. Thereby they maintain their position within the rope and support each other firmly.
In a preferred embodiment, the load bearing members next to each other in thickness direction have opposing sides, i.e sides facing in thickness direction of the rope towards each other, placed against each other, which sides are shaped to form counterparts for each other. Thereby they can be easily stacked and they can effectively give support for each other during use.
In a preferred embodiment, said opposing faces are flat. Thereby, these sides can be arranged to rest against each other with simple structure and large area, at the same time facilitating moveablity between them in longitudinal direction of the rope.
In a preferred embodiment, the coating forms the external surface of the rope. Thus, the rope is provided with a surface via which the rope can effectively engage frictionally with a drive wheel, if desired. Thus, it is also possible to provide the load bearing members with protection as well as friction properties adjustable to perform well in the intended use, for instance in terms of traction.
In a preferred embodiment, the coating may have a contoured shape, such as polyvee pattern of longitudinal grooves and ribs, on one or both of its sides facing in thickness direction of the rope, or a tooth pattern of teeth extending at least substantially in transverse direction of the rope, on one or both of its sides facing in thickness direction of the rope.
In a preferred embodiment, the load bearing members are provided for moving relative to each other in longitudinal direction of the rope within the hoisting rope by sliding against each other in longitudinal direction of the hoisting rope. This can be facilitated in one or more ways, such as by smooth shaping of the opposing sides, by lubrication or by material selection of the faces. Said opposing sides placed against each other are preferably unattached to each other so movement is allowed without first breaking of an attachment between them.
In a preferred embodiment, said opposing sides are unattached to each other.
In a preferred embodiment, the rope contains lubricant for lubricating the interface between load bearing members next to each other in thickness direction of the rope.
In a preferred embodiment, said opposing faces are placed against each other directly and/or indirectly via nothing but a layer of lubricant between them.
In a preferred embodiment, the coating material does not extend between the load bearing members stacked against each other.
In a preferred embodiment, one or both of the load bearing members next to each other in thickness direction has/have an outer layer of low friction material, such as Teflon (Polytetrafluoroethylene; PTFE) for example, forming the side thereof which faces the load bearing member next to it in thickness direction of the rope.
In a preferred embodiment, the coating is elastic, thereby allowing relative movement between the load bearing members in longitudinal direction of the rope.
In a preferred embodiment, the coating is molded around the group of load bearing members such that it is attached to the periphery of the group of load bearing members.
In a preferred embodiment, the opposing sides placed against each other are smooth at least in the longitudinal direction of the rope.
In a preferred embodiment, said reinforcing fibers are carbon fibers but also other fibers can be used, such as glass fibers. Also preferably, all the individual reinforcing fibers of the load bearing member are bound to each other by the matrix.
In a preferred embodiment, the matrix comprises epoxy.
In a preferred embodiment, the reinforcing fibers of each load bearing member are substantially evenly distributed in the polymer matrix of the load bearing member in question. Furthermore, preferably, over 50% of the cross-sectional square area of the load bearing member consists of said reinforcing fibers. Thereby, a high tensile stiffness can be facilitated. Preferably, the load bearing members cover together over proportion 50% of the cross-section of the rope.
In a preferred embodiment, the module of elasticity E of the polymer matrix is over 2 GPa, most preferably over 2.5 GPa, yet more preferably in the range 2.5-10 GPa, most preferably of all in the range 2.5-3.5 GPa. In this way a structure is achieved wherein the matrix essentially supports the reinforcing fibers, in particular from buckling. One advantage, among others, is a longer service life. In the context of this kind of material the stacked structure is particularly advantageous as the downsides of rigidity in bending can thus be alleviated.
In a preferred embodiment, substantially all the reinforcing fibers of each load bearing member are parallel with the longitudinal direction of the load bearing member. Thereby the fibers are also parallel with the longitudinal direction of the rope as each load bearing member is oriented parallel with the longitudinal direction of the rope. This facilitates further the longitudinal stiffness of the rope. In the context of this kind of material the stacked structure is particularly advantageous as the downsides of rigidity in bending, caused by said stiffness, can thus be alleviated.
In a preferred embodiment, the coating comprises for the group an inside space closed in transverse direction of the rope wherein said group of load bearing members is contained, and in the inside space no other load bearing members, and preferably nor any other solid components, than said load bearing members of said group are contained.
In a preferred embodiment, the group comprises only, i.e. no other load bearing members than, said load bearing members stacked against each other in thickness direction of the rope. In this case, in the group there are no load bearing members adjacent each other in width direction of the rope.
In a preferred embodiment, the rope comprises a plurality of groups of load bearing members as defined adjacently in width direction of the rope. For example the number of said groups can be 2 to 10.
In a preferred embodiment, said same coating encases each group of load bearing members.
In a preferred embodiment, the groups are spaced apart in width direction of the rope the coating extends between groups next to each other isolating the groups from each other. Thereby the coating forms a common coating for all of the groups of load bearing members which encases all these groups. The coating preferably surrounds (in transverse direction) each of said groups and fills space(s) that exist in width direction between adjacent groups. The groups and the load bearing members thereof are untwisted and parallel with each other and with the rope.
In a preferred embodiment, the number of load bearing members in said group is greater than what was described above, in particular from ten to one hundred. Then, most preferably but not necessarily, the thickness of each individual load bearing member is within range 0.1-2 mm and their combined thickness is between 1 to 20 mm.
In a preferred embodiment, the stacked structure is used for making an individual rope slim. Using a composite material with rigid matrix having module of elasticity E of the polymer matrix over 2 GPa, most preferably over 2.5 GPa, yet more preferably in the range 2.5-10 GPa, most preferably of all in the range 2.5-3.5 GPa, enables stacking a greater number of load bearing members, preferably at least 5 load bearing members, against each other even to such extent that the overall thickness is reached which makes the thickness of the rope greater than the width thereof, the width/thickness-ratio of the rope being at most 1. This would not be feasible with elastic matrix as the tension of the outermost load bearing parts in a rope suspending the car would compress the innermost ropes excessively against the rope wheels. The resulting advantage would then be that the high overall thickness contributes in making the overall width of the rope bundle slim, because individual ropes would not be wide anymore.
It is also brought forward a new hoisting apparatus comprising one or more hoisting ropes as defined above or elsewhere in the application, such as in the claims. The hoisting rope may contain one or more of the preferred features in any combination. The hoisting apparatus brought forward is most preferably an elevator. The elevator preferably comprises a hoistway; an elevator car vertically movable in the hoistway; a counterweight vertically movable in the hoistway; a roping comprising one or more of said hoisting ropes, each interconnecting the elevator car and counterweight.
In a preferred embodiment, each of said one or more ropes pass around one or more rope wheels mounted in proximity of the upper end of the hoistway, such as inside the upper end of the hoistway or inside a space beside or above the upper end of the hoistway.
In a preferred embodiment, said one or more rope wheels comprise a drive wheel engaging said one or more ropes; and the elevator comprises a motor for rotating the drive wheel, and an elevator control unit for automatically controlling rotation of the motor.
In a preferred embodiment, each rope passes around said one or more rope wheels turning around an axis extending in width direction of the rope.
In a preferred embodiment, each of said one or more ropes passes around the one or more rope wheels the side thereof which faces in thickness direction and extends in width direction of the of the rope, resting against the rope wheel.
The hoisting apparatus is preferably and elevator. The elevator is preferably such that the car thereof is arranged to serve two or more landings. The elevator preferably controls movement of the car in response to calls from landing and/or destination commands from inside the car so as to serve persons on the landing(s) and/or inside the elevator car. Preferably, the car has an interior space suitable for receiving a passenger or passengers, and the car can be provided with a door for forming a closed interior space.
In the following, the present invention will be described in more detail by way of example and with reference to the attached drawings, in which
The foregoing aspects, features and advantages of the invention will be apparent from the drawings and the detailed description related thereto.
The load bearing members 3 being substantially larger in width direction w than in thickness direction t of the rope hoisting 2,2′, they become easy to stack against each other in thickness direction t of the hoisting rope 2,2′ as well as maintain the architecture of the hoisting rope 2,2′ unchanged during use of the hoisting rope 2,2′. Furthermore, the load bearing members 3 being substantially larger in width direction w than in thickness direction t of the rope hoisting 2,2′, their resistance against bending around an axis extending in width direction of the hoisting rope 2,2′ is reduced. This is advantageous when the cross sectional area of load bearing member 3 needs to be large so as to achieve good load bearing ability and the hoisting rope 2,2′ needs to be bendable around rope wheels. This is advantageous particularly in case the material of the load bearing member is hard to bend, which is the case with the composite material, and particularly so in the case of the materials as will be specified later in the description. The width/thickness—ratio of the load bearing members 3 is preferably at least 2, whereby the advantages related to the stackability and relative position of the load bearing members 3 are become clearly substantiated. However, so as to facilitate the stability of the architecture of the rope 2,2′ the width/thickness—ratio of the load bearing members is preferably at least 4 (preferably even more), whereby they maintain their relative position and support each other firmly in all situations.
The hoisting rope 2,2′ is also preferably belt shaped, and thereby substantially larger in width direction w than in thickness direction of the hoisting rope 2,2′, whereby the total resistance thereof against bending around an axis extending in width direction w of the hoisting rope 2,2′ is reduced. The width/thickness—ratio of the hoisting rope 2,2′ is preferably at least 2 whereby the advantages related to the bending resistance become clearly substantial.
The group G is preferably more specifically such that the load bearing members 3 of the group G, which are next to each other in thickness direction t of the rope 2,2′ have opposing sides placed against each other. These sides are shaped to form counterparts for each other, whereby they can support each other. In this example they are both planar. Said sides face each other (thereby facing in thickness direction of the rope 2,2′; upwards and downwards in
At the interface between each pair of load bearing members 3, internal stresses are at least to some amount released. At the point of the interface, when the rope 2,2′ is sharply bent, relative movement can take place between the load bearing members 3 next to each other in thickness direction of the rope without damaging internal structure of the load bearing members 3 of the rope, which kind of movement would not be possible with a rope provided with single load bearing member. Preferably, the load bearing members 3 are provided for moving within the hoisting rope 2,2′ by sliding against each other in longitudinal direction of the hoisting rope 2,2′. This can be facilitated in one or more ways, such as by smooth shaping of the opposing sides and/or by lubrication and/or by material selection of the faces. Said opposing sides placed against each other are preferably unattached to each other so movement is allowed without breaking of an attachment between them. The load bearing members 3 next to each other in thickness direction of the rope 2,2′ can move slide along each other in longitudinal direction of the rope 2,2′ is allowed also due to the feature that the load bearing members 3 are not twisted together. Also due to the feature that the load bearing members 3 are not twisted together, the sliding referred to occurs only in longitudinal direction of the rope 2,2′.
To facilitate sliding between the load bearing members 3 next to each other in thickness direction t of the hoisting rope 2,2′, the rope 2,2′ may contain lubricant for lubricating the interface between load bearing members next to each other. Accordingly, then lubricant exists between the load bearing members 3 next to each other in thickness direction of the rope 2,2′, in particular between said opposing sides placed against each other. Said opposing sides placed against each are placed against each other preferably directly with nothing but possibly a layer of lubricant between them. Lubricant or any other additional means for facilitating slidability between the load bearing members 3 is not necessary. As an alternative or additional means for facilitating slidability between the load bearing members 3, one or both of the load bearing members 3 next to each other in thickness direction may have an outer layer of low friction material, such as Teflon (Polytetrafluoroethylene; PTFE) for example, forming the side thereof which faces the load bearing member 3 next to it in thickness direction t.
The structure is more specifically such that the coating 4 comprises for each group G an inside space closed in transverse direction wherein the group G of load bearing members 3 is contained. In the preferred embodiments presented, in the inside space no other load bearing members nor any other solid components than said load bearing members of said group G are contained, which is preferable as no other components are needed for efficient and intended functioning of the solution. In the embodiments illustrated, the group G comprises only (i.e. no other load bearing members than) said load bearing members 3, which are stacked against each other in thickness direction t of the rope 2,2′. Thereby, in the group there are no load bearing members adjacent each other in width direction w of the rope 2,2′. Thus, occurrence of unnecessary chafing inside the rope 2,2′ is minimized.
In the embodiment of
The coating 4 is preferably elastic, whereby it allows the load bearing members 3 to move in longitudinal direction of the hoisting rope 2,2′ within the rope, in particular by sliding against each other in longitudinal direction of the hoisting rope 2,2′. In each of the preferred cases, the coating 4 forms the external surface of the hoisting rope 2,2′. The coating 4 can be formed such that its shape and material suits optimally for the intended use. The coating 4 may have a contoured shape, such as polyvee pattern of longitudinal grooves and ribs, on one or both of its sides that face in thickness direction of the rope, or a tooth pattern of teeth extending across the hoisting rope 2,2′ substantially in transverse direction of the hoisting rope, on one or both of its sides that face in thickness direction of the hoisting rope 2,2′. Alternatively, the coating 4 could have a further coating, should it be preferred to for the external surface of the hoisting rope 2,2′ of some other material than the material of said coating 4.
The coating 3 is preferably attached to the group G of load bearing members 3. Particularly, the coating is preferably molded around the group G of load bearing members 3 such that it is attached to the periphery of the group G of load bearing members 3.
It is preferable that the number of load bearing members 3 in a group G is at least 2 and less than 10. In the preferred embodiments illustrated in
The preferred inner structure of the load bearing member 3 is preferably as described in the following, wherein the structure is explained in further preferred details by referring to
The reinforcing fibers F are preferably long continuous fibers in the longitudinal direction of the load bearing member, the fibers F preferably continuing for the whole length of the load bearing member 3 as well as the rope 2,2′. Thus, the load bearing ability as well as manufacturing of the load bearing member 3 is facilitated. The fibers F being oriented parallel with longitudinal direction of the rope 2,2′, as far as possible, the cross section of the load bearing member 3 can be made to continue substantially the same in terms of its cross-section for the whole length of the rope 2,2′. Thus, no substantial relative movement can occur inside the load bearing member 3 when it is bent.
As mentioned, the reinforcing fibers F are preferably distributed in the aforementioned load bearing member 3 substantially evenly, in particular as evenly as possible, so that the load bearing member 3 would be as homogeneous as possible in the transverse direction thereof. An advantage of the structure presented is that the matrix m surrounding the reinforcing fibers F keeps the interpositioning of the reinforcing fibers F substantially unchanged. It equalizes with its slight elasticity the distribution of a force exerted on the fibers, reduces fiber-fiber contacts and internal wear of the rope, thus improving the service life of the rope 2,2′. The composite matrix m, into which the individual fibers F are distributed as evenly as possible, is most preferably made of epoxy, which has good adhesiveness to the reinforcement fibers F and which is known to behave advantageously with carbon fiber. Alternatively, e.g. polyester or vinyl ester can be used, but alternatively any other suitable alternative materials can be used.
The reinforcing fibers F together with the matrix m form a uniform load bearing member, inside which abrasive relative movement does not occur when the rope is bent. The individual reinforcing fibers of the load bearing member 3 are mainly surrounded with polymer matrix m, but random fiber-fiber contacts can occur because controlling the position of the fibers in relation to each other in their simultaneous impregnation with polymer is difficult, and on the other hand, perfect elimination of random fiber-fiber contacts is not necessary from the viewpoint of the functioning of the solution. If, however, it is desired to reduce their random occurrence, the individual reinforcing fibers F can be pre-coated with material of the matrix m such that a coating of polymer material of said matrix is around each of them already before they are brought and bound together with the matrix material, e.g. before they are immersed in the fluid matrix material.
As above mentioned, the matrix m of the load bearing member 3 is most preferably hard in its material properties. A hard matrix m helps to support the reinforcing fibers f, especially when the rope bends, preventing buckling of the reinforcing fibers F of the bent rope, because the hard material supports the fibers F efficiently. To reduce the buckling and to facilitate a small bending radius of the load bearing member 3, among other things, it is therefore preferred that the polymer matrix m is hard, and in particular non-elastomeric. The most preferred materials for the matrix are epoxy resin, polyester, phenolic plastic or vinyl ester. The polymer matrix m is preferably so hard that its module of elasticity (E) is over 2 GPa, most preferably over 2.5 GPa. In this case the module of elasticity E is preferably in the range 2.5-10 GPa, most preferably in the range 2.5-3.5 GPa. There are commercially available various material alternatives for the matrix m which can provide these material properties. Preferably over 50% of the surface area of the cross-section of the load bearing member 3 is of the aforementioned reinforcing fiber, preferably such that 50%-80% is of the aforementioned reinforcing fiber, more preferably such that 55%-70% is of the aforementioned reinforcing fiber, and substantially all the remaining surface area is of polymer matrix. Most preferably, this is carried out such that approx. 60% of the surface area is of reinforcing fiber and approx. 40% is of matrix material (preferably epoxy material). In this way a good longitudinal stiffness for the load bearing member 3 is achieved. As mentioned carbon fiber is the most preferred fiber to be used as said reinforcing fiber due to its excellent properties. However, this is not necessary as alternative fibers could be used, such as glass fiber, which has been found to be suitable for the hoisting rope as well.
In the illustrated embodiments, the load bearing members 3 are substantially rectangular. However, this is not necessary as alternative shapes could be used. Likewise, it is not necessary that all the load bearing members 3 of one group G are similar in cross section, as is the case in the illustrated embodiments. Alternatively load bearing members different in cross section could be stacked against each other in thickness direction of the rope, although it is preferable also in this case that the load bearing members next to each other in thickness direction have opposing sides (facing in thickness direction of the rope) placed against each other, which sides are shaped to form counterparts for each other. Then, one of the sides could be concave shaped and the other convex shaped, for instance.
So as to utilize the rope features facilitating rope bending, the hoisting ropes 2,2′ are arranged such that each of said one or more hoisting ropes 2,2′ passes around the one or more rope wheels 11, 12 the side thereof which faces in thickness direction t and extends in width direction w of the of the hoisting rope 2,2′, rests against the rope wheel 11, 12. Each hoisting rope passes around the one or more rope wheels 11, 12 turning around an axis extending in width direction w of the hoisting rope 2,2′. The reinforcing fibers F of the composite members are preferably carbon fibers, which are light-weighted and possess excellent load-bearing ability in longitudinal direction. Thereby, the elevator has excellent properties in terms of lifting capacity and energy-efficiency.
The elevator illustrated in
In the application only elevator has been presented as a hoisting apparatus utilizing the hoisting rope 2,2′. However, the hoisting rope 2,2′ could be utilized in some other type of hoisting apparatus, such as a crane.
As mentioned, it is preferable that the number of load bearing members 3 in a group G is at least 2 and less than 10. With small number of load bearing members 3 in a group G, a considerable addition for the thickness of the load bearing cross section is obtained with simple structure. When the number of load bearing members is within the above given range of at least 2 and less than 10 (i.e. 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8 or 9), the thickness of each individual load bearing member is preferably within range 0.5-4 mm, their combined thickness then preferably being between 1 to 20 mm, whereby a rope best suitable for elevator is obtained in particular due to its behavior in bending. However, the above given range of at least 2 and less than 10 need not necessarily be realized as the number could be alternatively be even greater, such as up to one hundred, when a more complicated structure is acceptable. In case the number is greater than said at least 2 and less than 10 the thickness of each individual load bearing member is preferably smaller than above mentioned, most preferably within range 0.1-2 mm, their combined thickness then preferably again being between said 1 to 20 mm.
It is to be understood that the above description and the accompanying Figures are only intended to teach the best way known to the inventors to make and use the invention. It will be apparent to a person skilled in the art that the inventive concept can be implemented in various ways. The above-described embodiments of the invention may thus be modified or varied, without departing from the invention, as appreciated by those skilled in the art in light of the above teachings. It is therefore to be understood that the invention and its embodiments are not limited to the examples described above but may vary within the scope of the claims and their equivalents.
| Number | Date | Country | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 14191398 | Nov 2014 | EP | regional |
This application is a Continuation of PCT International Application No. PCT/FI2015/050742, filed on Oct. 28, 2015, which claims priority under 35 U.S.C. 119(a) to Patent Application No. 14191398.8, filed in Europe on Nov. 3, 2014, all of which are hereby expressly incorporated by reference into the present application.
| Number | Name | Date | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1998816 | Meyer | Apr 1935 | A |
| 20080078157 | Dold | Apr 2008 | A1 |
| 20080277206 | Veronesi | Nov 2008 | A1 |
| 20110000746 | Pelto-Huikko et al. | Jan 2011 | A1 |
| 20110240408 | Wesson | Oct 2011 | A1 |
| 20110259677 | Dudde et al. | Oct 2011 | A1 |
| 20120195733 | Bruch et al. | Aug 2012 | A1 |
| Number | Date | Country |
|---|---|---|
| 1 334 943 | Aug 2003 | EP |
| WO-2009090299 | Jul 2009 | WO |
| WO 2011029726 | Mar 2011 | WO |
| WO 2011029726 | May 2011 | WO |
| WO 2012168007 | Dec 2012 | WO |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 20170217729 A1 | Aug 2017 | US |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Parent | PCT/FI2015/050742 | Oct 2015 | US |
| Child | 15492542 | US |
