Patent Application
20110318497
The invention relates to elevator systems and more particularly to elevator sheaves that are subjected to wear during use.
A conventional traction elevator system typically includes a car, a counterweight, two or more tension members (such as round ropes) interconnecting the car and counterweight, a traction sheave to move the ropes, and a machine to rotate the traction sheave. The machine may be either a geared or gearless machine. A geared machine permits the use of a higher speed motor, which is more compact and less costly, but requires additional maintenance and space.
The ropes (whether the ropes are for the car and counterweight or for the overspeed governor) can be formed from laid or twisted steel wire and the sheave (whether the drive sheave, deflector sheave or governor sheave) can be formed from cast iron. Differential tension on each side of the sheave, or rope deformation due to the tension applied, or misalignment of the sheave, can all cause relative motion between the rope and the sheave. The contact plus relative motion results in wear of the sheave and wire rope. Additionally, in the overspeed governor situation the sheave may be used for applying significant tension to the rope to actuate the safeties on the elevator. This function requires controlled friction between the sheave and the rope.
Large traction sheaves are often made from cast iron and can sometimes exhibit excessive wear in use. The sheaves function in combination with ropes that raise and lower elevator cars in various elevator systems such as those where the elevator car is supported by hoist ropes that are driven by a hoist motor. Elevator systems may also employ a counterweight at the opposite end of the hoist ropes. An example of an elevator system having a counterweight is described in commonly owned U.S. Pat. No. 3,610,342.
Conventional steel rope and cast iron sheaves have proven to be very reliable and cost effective. One limitation of these arrangements is the traction forces between the ropes and the sheaves. While ropes can be replaced, cast iron sheaves are difficult to maintain. One remedy is machining the sheaves in the hoistway, but this has limited effectiveness due to the confines of the hoistway space. Often times, full replacement of the sheave is required, which is expensive and results in unwanted down time. In some situations, full replacement of sheaves may require de-construction of the building and considerable down time for an elevator.
If larger sheaves are used, to obtain longer life or to accommodate additional ropes or a thicker cross section of a steel rope, more torque is required from the machine to drive the elevator system, thereby increasing the size and cost of the elevator system.
The present invention provides a method of repairing the sheaves in an elevator system.
The method includes selecting a sheave to be repaired, removing the at least one rope associated with the selected sheave, cleaning the sheave to restore the sheave to a desired condition, depositing a coating on the cleaned surface of the sheave, the coating being adapted to reduce the wear coefficient of the surface of the sheave. The coating provides a wear coefficient on the sheave of less than 2.0×1010 mm2N and more preferred are wear coefficients of less than 1.0×100 mm2N. This results in a reduction in wear coefficient of about 20% to 10% of the wear coefficient of the sheave without a coating (i.e., over 80% to 90% reduction). The thickness of the coated sheave may be adjusted to a predetermined level, such as original equipment dimension specifications for the sheave.
As shown in
To achieve the desired arrangement of the ropes in the hoistway, the elevator system could include one or more deflector sheaves. The ropes engage the deflector sheave, but unlike the traction sheave do not drive the ropes.
The elevator system can also include a safety system, as seen in
Since the sheaves can be used in a variety of shapes and sizes, depending on the specific use for which they are intended. Each has a predetermined shape and size for engagement with at least one rope or other friction element in the elevator system. It is to be understood that any sheave used in an elevator system for friction engagement with a friction element is within the scope of this invention.
As seen in
Sheave 24 is shown with a coating 27 that has been applied to it in the region where the tension member 22 engages the sheave 24. The coating, 27, is shown larger than in actual practice to illustrate its relationship to the sheave 24 and tension member 22. The sheave 24 has a predetermined width and diameter prior to having coating 27 applied to it, and after coating, as shown in
The wear coefficient of a sheave is essentially a measurement of the wear rate of the surface. In evaluating wear on surfaces, the volume of wear that is measured (V)mm3 is equal to the wear coefficient (K) mm2/n times the applied load (P) N (Newtons) times the sliding distance (D) mm. As a formula, this is V=K(PD), where V, K, P and D are defined as above.
Coating 27 may be any coating that reduces the wear coefficient of the region of sheave 24 in contact with the tension member 22. Cast iron Grade 40, which is a conventional material for sheave construction, has a wear coefficient K of about 1.03×10−9 mm2/N. Preferred are wear coefficients of less than about 2.0×10−10 mm2/N and more preferred are wear coefficients of less than about 1.0×10−10 mm2/N. This translates into a wear coefficient that is about 20% of the wear coefficient of the uncoated sheave 24 (i.e., an 80% reduction in wear coefficient). Preferred is a reduction of the wear coefficient by about 15%, and most preferred is a reduction in wear coefficient by about 10% from the wear coefficient of an uncoated sheave. The range of 80% to 90% reduction has been found to significantly improve the life of the sheave and of the ropes or other friction elements that are in contact with such a coating. The coating thickness will vary depending on the type of coating applied, the forces the friction element presents to the sheave, and the size of the sheave and friction element, as well as other factors.
A wide variety of coatings may be used with the present invention. Examples, by way of example and not as a limitation, include pure metal powders include aluminum, cobalt, copper, iron, nickel, molybdenum, and titanium. Metal alloy powders include alloys of two or more elements selected from aluminum, cobalt, copper, nickel, molybdenum, silicon and iron. Metal carbide powders include chromium carbide and tungsten carbide. Ceramic oxide powders include aluminum oxide, chromium oxide, titanium oxide, and zirconium oxide. Metal wires include aluminum, cobalt, copper, iron, nickel, titanium and alloy wires of two or more elements selected from aluminum, cobalt, copper, nickel, molybdenum, silicon and iron, as well as wires containing chromium carbide and tungsten carbide.
Coatings selected from the group consisting of cobalt alloys having a chromium component, molybdenum, cobalt phosphorus and nickel tungsten alloys. An exemplary cobalt alloy has a trade designation of Stellite 6, and has a composition by wt. % of about 27% chromium, 4% tungsten, 3% iron and 3% nickel, and 1% silicon and 1% carbon. Molybdenum is pure and not an alloy. Cobalt phosphorous is a cobalt alloy with by wt. % 4% to 6% phosphorous. Nickel tungsten alloys have by wt. % about 65% nickel and 35% tungsten.
The coatings may be applied in a variety of ways. All that is necessary is to apply the material, whether a metal or an alloy or other material, to the intended surface to permit the material to harden and bond to the sheave surface. High velocity oxygen fuel spray, plasma spray, cold spray, arc-wire, laser cladding and electroplating methods are all preferred. Once the coating has been applied, it can be fused by application of additional heat, or that step can be omitted. The most effective method for applying the coating, of course, requires that the source of energy be sufficiently portable to be brought into the machine room 26 so that the sheave 24 can be coated in place, without requiring it to be removed or dismantled from motor 20. Thermal spray processes such as flame spray, cold spray, arc-wire and plasma spray are preferred.
When it is time to repair a sheave, the repair crew enters the machine room 26 and fixes the elevator car 14 and counterweight 16 in place so they do not move. Rope or tension member 22 is removed by rotation of the motor drive unit 20. The surface of traction sheave 24 (under coating 27 in
The desired coating is then applied using equipment that can be brought into the machine room. Thermal spray processes such as flame spray, arc-wire and plasma can be scaled down or modified to fit in the machine room. Cold spray may also be used. Microplasma spray systems, cold spray systems, spray welders and brush plating have all been found to be sized appropriately to be used in a machine room. A uniform coating thickness is best achieved by rotating the sheave using the motor 20 while applying the coating using any of the methods described herein.
The coating can range in thickness from about 0.1 mm to 1.25 mm, with a thinner coating being less expensive in material cost and processing cost. More preferred is a range of about 0.125 mm to about 1.0 mm, and most preferred is from about 0.15 mm to about 0.75 mm. All that is necessary is to have a sufficient thickness to present a wear resistant surface with a wear coefficient K (mm2 N) of less than about 2.0×10−10 mm2N as noted above.
As noted in
A number of materials were evaluated as coatings for sheaves in accordance with the present invention. The wear coefficient K mm2=V mm3/(P N×D mm) is determined by measuring the volume V in cubic millimeters of wear debris from the sheave surface as it is subjected to a load in Newtons (N) over a distance in millimeters. Tests were run on various coatings using a first load of 444 Newtons over a span of 8.9 mm over a single day of testing. Other tests at 222 Newtons and 666 Newtons were made on selected coatings. Presented below in Table I are the results of some of tests showing a significant improvement in the wear coefficient K in mm2n as noted above.
As can be seen from the data in Table I, the four coatings that were tested reduced the coefficient of wear of the sheave significantly and also resulted in improved wear on the ropes when compared to the same rope used on an uncoated sheave. In some cases the sheave wear coefficient improved to a value less than 18.2% to as low as 6.25% of the control wear coefficient. The rope wear coefficient improvement ranged from 41.7% to 9.7% of the wear coefficient compared to the control.
Although the present invention has been described with reference to preferred embodiments, workers skilled in the art will recognize that changes may be made in form and detail without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention.
| Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind | 371c Date |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PCT/US08/13995 | 12/23/2008 | WO | 00 | 6/23/2011 |
