The present disclosure relates generally to a holding arrangement for a surgical device for use with delicate and critical tissues; the holding arrangement being compatible with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI).
Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) has a wide range of applications in medical diagnosis and has become the investigative tool of choice for neurological abnormalities due to its heightened sensitivity for small tumors and ability to offer higher quality tissue visualization. Moreover, MRI provides a sufficient contrast between variations of tissues within the white matter and the gray matter as well as to provide accurate differentiation of many conditions of the brain. However, since MRI forms a strong magnetic field around the area to be imaged, it is necessary for safety and imaging quality to ensure that materials that induce significant susceptibility can be used in the bore of the MRI or the immediate region of the bore.
Notwithstanding the foregoing advances in imaging technology and both frame and frameless stereotactic image guidance techniques, there remains a need for an improved surgical techniques and apparatus for diagnostic and intervention procedures for brain tissue, including mechanisms for holding a surgical access system in place that allows for effective access to the area of interest, can be secured to the patient, while improving accuracy, freeing a surgeon's hand for other procedural activities, and is compatible with imaging technology, especially MRI. Specifically, there is a need for a holding arrangement compatible with MRI to allow use of MRI for diagnostic and interventional capabilities while providing an effective non-distortional imaging environment while being safe for the patient and the clinical staff.
An exemplary holder member of a holding arrangement for a surgical access assembly is disclosed. The holder comprises: one or more legs, each having a base and a pair of jaws. The one or more legs, one or more bases, and/or the pair of jaws maybe malleable.
Another exemplary holding arrangement for a surgical access assembly is disclosed. The holding arrangement comprises: a holder member and a support member selectively engageable with the holder member. At least the support member is compatible with a magnetic resonance imaging device.
Exemplary embodiments of the present disclosure will now be described in greater detail with reference to the attached figures, in which:
Referring now to the discussion that follows and also to the drawings, illustrative approaches to the disclosed assemblies and methods are shown in detail. Although the drawings represent some possible approaches, the drawings are not necessarily to scale and certain features may be exaggerated, removed, or partially sectioned to better illustrate and explain the present disclosure. Further, the descriptions set forth herein are not intended to be exhaustive or otherwise limit or restrict the claims to the precise forms and configurations shown in the drawings and disclosed in the following detailed description.
Described herein is a holding arrangement for a surgical access system compatible with MRI technology, various components of the holding arrangement, and a method of using same. The components described herein provide surgeons with an enhanced ability to minimize trauma to the patient during intracranial diagnosis and surgical treatment.
More specifically, a holding arrangement for a surgical access system is disclosed. A surgical access system may be any intracranial surgical access system which may be supported by the holding arrangement in such a way that the surgical access system can perform its function. In one exemplary arrangement, the surgical system comprises one or more outer sheaths, one or more removable medical or diagnostic and/or surgical devices, at least some of which can be inserted in and out of the outer sheath of the holding arrangement. Such a device may be, for example, an obturator, a navigational stylet, a drainage catheter, a device for delivery of a therapeutic, a probe such as an ultrasound probe, more preferably an MRI probe, or another device to be utilized during intracranial diagnosis and/or a surgical procedure. In another non-limiting exemplary embodiment, the holding arrangement comprises a plurality of holder members and a plurality of support members and/or a plurality of medical or diagnostic devices.
Referring to
In one exemplary arrangement, the body 14 of the support member 10 comprises a plurality of sections: the engagement portion 32, the proximal section 16, the retaining section 18, and the shaft section 20. In one exemplary configuration, the body 14 of the support member 10 is configured in one plane. In another exemplary arrangement, as seen in
In the exemplary arrangement shown in
The proximal section 16 of the support member 10 engages the holder member 36 so that the support member 10 can be attached, secured, or both, to a patient's skull which secures the desired X-Y-Z position of the sheath and frees the surgeon's hands. The proximal section 16 may be attached and/or secured before, during, or after the outer sheath 30 is successfully positioned in tissue.
In one exemplary arrangement, the proximal section 16, the shaft section 20, and/or the retaining section 18, and/or one or more portions thereof, comprise the engagement portion 32 of the support member 10. As best seen in
As can be seen in
As shown in
In one exemplary embodiment, the holder member 36 is formed integrally. In an alternative attunement, the holder member 36 comprises more than two parts which are formed separately and assembled together. At least some parts of the holder member 36 may be malleable so that one or more parts of the holder member 36 may be extended or bent in different directions to accommodate various angles. The holder member 36 thus should be made from a bendable material such as aluminum or a plastic with relief. The material should also be compatible with MRI technology while providing sufficient strength so that the holder member 36 is able to carry the weight of the support member 10, the outer sheath 30, and one or more devices, and/or instruments inserted within the outer sheath 30, and/or one or more additional members of the surgical access system.
In an exemplary configuration, the holder member 36 comprises one or more legs 38 which provide support to the holder member 36, stabilize the holder member 36, and/or allow the holder member 36 to be attached to a surface such as a patient's skull. As is shown in
In one exemplary arrangement, the legs 38 are spaced apart in a way which provides stability to the holder member 36. For example, as can be seen in
In another exemplary configuration, the holder member 36 further comprises a neck portion 44 which connects at least some of the legs 38 with the top portion 46 of the holder member 36. As is shown in
Referring to
In an alternative embodiment, the proximal section 16 of the support member 10 may include additional stop members (not shown) which may prevent movement of the support member 10 once the support member 10 is engaged in the notch 52 to prevent movement of the support member 10 during diagnosis and/or surgical procedure. The proximal section 16 may further comprise a rotation barrel (not shown) or another member enabling the support member 10 to be selectively rotated about the proximal section 16.
Referring to
Referring now to
The method comprises the following steps which may be performed in any order. A surgeon may assemble a holding arrangement 12 (as best seen in
It is intended that the scope of the present methods and apparatuses be defined by the following claims. However, it must be understood that this disclosure may be practiced otherwise than is specifically explained and illustrated without departing from its spirit or scope. It should be understood by those skilled in the art that various alternatives to the embodiments described herein may be employed in practicing the claims without departing from the spirit and scope as defined in the following claims. The scope of the disclosure should be determined, not with reference to the above description, but should instead be determined with reference to the appended claims, along with the full scope of equivalents to which such claims are entitled. It is anticipated and intended that future developments will occur in the arts discussed herein, and that the disclosed systems and methods will be incorporated into such future examples. Furthermore, all terms used in the claims are intended to be given their broadest reasonable constructions and their ordinary meanings as understood by those skilled in the art unless an explicit indication to the contrary is made herein. In particular, use of the singular articles such as “a,” “the,” “said,” etc. should be read to recite one or more of the indicated elements unless a claim recites an explicit limitation to the contrary. It is intended that the following claims define the scope and that the method and apparatus within the scope of these claims and their equivalents be covered thereby. In sum, it should be understood that the invention is capable of modification and variation and is limited only by the following claims.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3690323 | Wortman et al. | Sep 1972 | A |
4165745 | Heifetz | Aug 1979 | A |
4386602 | Sheldon et al. | Jun 1983 | A |
4638798 | Shelden et al. | Jan 1987 | A |
5183464 | Dubrui et al. | Feb 1993 | A |
5217441 | Shichman | Jun 1993 | A |
5320611 | Bonutti et al. | Jun 1994 | A |
5431676 | Dubrul et al. | Jul 1995 | A |
5441042 | Putman | Aug 1995 | A |
5860996 | Urban et al. | Jan 1999 | A |
5876410 | Petillo | Mar 1999 | A |
5904702 | Ek | May 1999 | A |
6047218 | Whayne et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6129685 | Howard, III | Oct 2000 | A |
6179826 | Aebischer et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6226548 | Foley et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6245052 | Orth et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6280399 | Rossin et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6293952 | Brosens et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6331180 | Cosman et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6374135 | Bucholz | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6416520 | Kynast | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6669685 | Rizoiu et al. | Dec 2003 | B1 |
6942634 | Odland | Sep 2005 | B2 |
7857271 | Lees | Dec 2010 | B2 |
8979735 | Augarten | Mar 2015 | B2 |
20020038116 | Lee | Mar 2002 | A1 |
20030073934 | Putz | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030191371 | Smith et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20040024291 | Zinkel | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040059375 | Ginn et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040068172 | Nowinski et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040077938 | Mark | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040102804 | Chin | May 2004 | A1 |
20040149874 | Stoianovici | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040152968 | Iversen | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040186346 | Smith et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040215143 | Brady et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20050148808 | Cameron | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050193451 | Quistgaard | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20060122496 | George | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060161039 | Juliana | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20070100211 | Selover et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070270898 | Lillehei | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20090048622 | Wilson | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090312611 | Mangiardi | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20100010315 | Mangiardi | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100122419 | Zupancic-Albin | May 2010 | A1 |
20110152903 | Wiedenbein | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20120253353 | McBride | Oct 2012 | A1 |
20120289816 | Mark | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20130102851 | Mark | Apr 2013 | A1 |
20130304216 | Paspa | Nov 2013 | A1 |
20140107665 | Shellenberger | Apr 2014 | A1 |
20140133627 | Sakuragi | May 2014 | A1 |
20140288578 | Solar | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20150327765 | Crane | Nov 2015 | A1 |
20180064364 | Oziel | Mar 2018 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2009124446 | Jan 2011 | RU |
2006017507 | Feb 2006 | WO |
2006050047 | May 2006 | WO |
2007002251 | Jan 2007 | WO |
2008066543 | Jun 2008 | WO |
2008121294 | Oct 2008 | WO |
Entry |
---|
PCT International Search Report dated Jul. 24, 2014 for PCT/US2014/015755. |
PCT International Search Report and Opinion dated Apr. 9, 2013 for PCT/US2012/061568. |
PCT International Search Report dated Jun. 20, 2006 for PCT/US05/39185. |
Manuel Dujovny, et al., “Brain Retractor Systems,” Neurological Research, vol. 37, No. 7, (2010). |
O. Barlas, et al., Clincial Article, Stereotractically guided microsurgical removal of colloid cysts, Acta Neurochir (Wien) (2004). |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20160128720 A1 | May 2016 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
62078575 | Nov 2014 | US |