The present invention relates generally to hollow beam electron guns used with multiple cavity klystrons. These klystrons can be used for particle accelerators and colliders, power amplifier for radar and directed energy applications.
The velocity modulation is also known as bunching which is caused by the oscillating electric fields applied to the drift tubes. As each sequential cavity is encountered, electrons are accelerated during opposing electric fields and pass through the drift tubes 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35 and other electrons are slowed during a corresponding electric field. This cycling causes the electrons to be grouped into bunches at the input frequency. The geometries of the cavities 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22 along the length of the klystron are designed to enhance the bunching of electrons. The spacing between successive cavities 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22 is also intended to optimize the electron bunching and improve the output power of the klystron 10.
Solid electron beam klystrons require a high beam voltage to keep the interaction efficiency high. The circuit length of the klystron is proportional to the electron beam voltage. Thus, a high beam voltage requires a larger klystron having a longer circuit length to keep the interaction efficiency. Another problem with high beam voltage is the increased probability of RF arcing which can damage or destroy a klystron. What is needed is an improved klystron that addresses operation at a lower beam voltage to reduce the required circuit length and reduce the probability of RF arcing.
The present invention is directed towards a hollow electron beam gun in lieu of a solid beam gun used with a klystron which performs RF power amplification. The electron gun includes a flat cathode that forms a ring around the center axis of the klystron. The cathode has a circular electron emitting surface that can be planar and substantially perpendicular to the center axis. A ring anode is separated from the flat cathode by a fixed gap. A heater is coupled to the cathode to heat the cathode. At a high temperature of about 1,100° C., the cathode is activated to emit electrons which are accelerated through the center of the ring anode. At this high temperature, the electron gun operates in a space charge limited operation which can be used to produce long pulses or continuous output of electrons that form the hollow electron beam. Focusing electrodes can be positioned adjacent to the inner and outer radius of the cathode. The electrodes are designed to produce a uniform cathode current density.
The hollow electron beam electron gun, mounted at a proximal portion of the klystron, emits a hollow electron beam towards the first cavity of the klystron. The hollow beam may be concentric with the axis of the drift tube and travel through an outer radial region within the drift tubes. For example, the inner radius of the hollow beam may be greater than 70% of the inner radius of the drift tube without any electrons travelling through the center of the drift tube. In the preferred embodiment, the inner and outer radii of the hollow electron beam may be located at about 80% and 90% of the of the drift tube inner radius respectively. Thus, the beam wall thickness of the hollow electron beam may be about 10% of the inner radius of the drift tube.
In contrast, a solid electron beam may have a beam diameter that is about 60% of the inner diameter of the drift tube. Thus, the thickness of the beam cross section and the space occupied by the hollow electron beam are substantially different than the cross section and space occupied by a solid electron beam.
The hollow electron beam travels through the drift tubes and past multiple resonant cavities that are tuned to the operating conditions of the klystron. Any number of drift tubes and resonant cavities can be used in the inventive klystron, however a typical hollow beam klystron may have from 5 to 10 resonant cavities. The first cavity at the proximal portion of the klystron includes an RF input port and the last cavity at the distal portion of the klystron includes an RF output port. A static magnetic field from an electromagnet or, equivalently, a solenoid is applied externally to the klystron to focus the hollow electron beam. The electron interaction depends on the amplitude and polarity of the oscillating electric fields from each cavity as the electron beam progresses through the drift tubes. During the time the electrons are traveling through the drift tubes between cavities, some are accelerated and the remaining are decelerated. This has the effect of forming bunches of electrons that arrive at the output cavity at the proper instant during each cycle of the RF field and deliver energy to the output cavity. Since the hollow electron beam has a thin cross section, the radial component of the cavity electric fields do not cause significant radial movement of the hollow beam electrons. Thus, the hollow electron beam remains in a fairly narrow radial oscillation envelope as the electron beam travels through the drift tubes and is absorbed by the collector.
The length of the klystron is proportional to the voltage applied to the electron beam, so a high voltage electron beam will have a longer circuit length than a system using a lower voltage electron beam. This relationship is true for both hollow and solid electron beam klystrons. However, a solid beam klystron will have a longer circuit length than a hollow beam klystron because solid beam klystron must operate at a higher electron beam voltage in order to have the same efficiency. For solid electron beam klystrons, the efficiency is inversely proportional to the “Perveance” which is defined as K=31.62×I/V3/2, where I is the beam current in amperes and V is the beam voltage in kilovolts. If the voltage is decreased, the perveance will increase and the efficiency is reduced. Thus, a high beam voltage is generally a requirement of an efficient sold electron beam klystron.
In contrast, the efficiency of the hollow electron beam klystron is substantially independent of perveance. A hollow electron beam klystron can operate at a lower beam voltage and a high perveance without decreasing the system efficiency. Since the hollow electron beam operates at a lower electron beam voltage than a solid electron beam, the hollow beam klystron has a shorter RF interaction circuit length. A shorter klystron is less expensive to build and easier to install at customer sites. The lower beam voltage also reduces the risk of RF arcing.
The inventive hollow electron beam klystron can replace directly solid beam klystrons with a large reduction in electron beam voltage, multiple beam klystrons where there are more than 6 cathodes and the cascade arrangements of multiple vacuum triodes in a common narrow band resonating cavity.
The present invention will be best understood, by reference to the following description and the accompanying drawings, wherein:
The following is a list of terms important to understanding the Klystron of the present invention. Each of the terms is followed by its corresponding definition as used herein.
Glossary of Terms
The present invention is directed towards an improved klystron which includes a special hollow electron beam gun that is used to generate a hollow electron beam. With reference to
The cathode 203 is heated by a heater (not shown) until thermionic emission of electrons from the electron emitting surface 205 occurs. In a preferred embodiment, the thermionic emission of the cathode is in a space charge limited region. The heating element can be a high resistive wire that is embedded in an insulated annular structure that is mounted within the ring cathode. The electron gun 201 and interior volume of the klystron are placed in a vacuum and electrical power applied to the heating element raises the temperature of the cathode 203 above the work function of the cathode material resulting in space charge limited emission of electrons. The electrons are emitted from the cathode surface 205.
The anode 211 is an annular electrode that is positively charged and mounted away from the cathode 203 by a fixed gap, the gap length being depended upon the design perveance of the klystron. The anode 211 is concentric with the cathode 203 about the center axis 210 and the inner diameter of the anode 211 is larger than the outer diameter of the electron emitting surface 205 of the cathode 203. A high voltage, pulse or constant in time, is applied across the cathode 203 and anode 211 that causes the electrons emitted by the cathode 203 to be attracted to the anode 211 in a hollow electron beam 221. The hollow electron beam passes through the orifice of the anode 211 into the first drift tube of the klystron. Although there is a slight movement of the electron beam diameter 221 in the radial direction resulting in slight variations to the electron beam 221 diameter, the hollow electron beam 221 will remain in a fairly small radial oscillation envelope. Thus, the hollow beam 221 emitted by the circular electron emitting surface 205 of the cathode 203 remains in substantially the same cross section through the length of the klystron. Almost all of the electron beam 221 movement is from the axial components of the magnetic fields which results in movement and bunching of the electron beam 221 in the axial direction.
A benefit of the cathode 203 of the inventive hollow beam electron gun 201 is that it operates in the “space charge limited” region in which excess electric charge is a continuum of charge distributed over a region of space. With reference to
In the preferred embodiment, the inventive electron gun 201 operates in the space charge limited region 431 and produces a steady stream of electrons which results in a steady beam current 407, constant RF power output and constant efficiency from the klystron. In contrast, earlier hollow beam devices employed an electron gun configuration referred to as a magnetron injection gun or MIG. The MIG incorporates a conical section cathode where the smaller diameter of the conical section is closer to the klystron circuit than the larger diameter. This results in electron mission with a large radial velocity component. The two disadvantages to the MIG is that the emission must be temperature limited 429 and the axial magnetic focusing field must be large to suppress the radial energy in the electron beam. Being temperature limited results in a variation of RF output power because the emission decreases substantially when the pulse length of the electron beam voltage is long. Also as a result of the large radial velocity of the electron beam, complete suppression cannot be obtained and therefore the interaction efficiency, being completely dependent on the axial energy in the electron beam, is reduced. Since a constant klystron output power is preferred, a hollow beam electron gun that operates in the space charge limited region is preferred over an electron source operating in the temperature limited region.
With reference to
Different types of magnetic fields can be applied to the drift tubes depending upon the type of electron beam being used. A solid electron beam can be focused by a constant magnetic field or a periodic permanent magnet (PPM) field. In contrast, a hollow electron beam can only be focused by a constant magnetic field. The electric fields emanating from the individual cavities comprising the klystron interaction circuit can be simulated using the code, SUPERFISH, that is available without charge from the Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, N.M. These electric fields, calculated in matrix form as functions of N iterations along the axis and M iterations for variations in radius, are tabulated and inserted directly into a klystron large signal code called KLSC where specific critical parameters such as efficiency and saturated gain can be determined.
With reference to
While the functions of both solid electron beam and hollow electron beam klystrons are similar, there are substantial benefits to using a hollow electron beam. A beam parameter called “perveance” is denoted by K in the formula: K=31.62×I/V3/2, where I is the beam current in amperes and V is the beam voltage in kilovolts. Klystrons that employ solid electron beams will normally exhibit a higher efficiency as the K decreases and a lower efficiency as the K increases. A solid electron beam klystron, in general, may have a K=0.5 microperv, if high efficiency is desired, however, this low K results in a larger beam voltage and consequently a longer interaction circuit. If efficiency is not important but more bandwidth and lower beam voltage are desirable, K may be as high as 2.0 micropervs which results in a lower beam voltage and a shorter interaction circuit. In contrast, the hollow beam klystron does not show this strong dependence between efficiency and perveance. The efficiency of the hollow electron beam is not significantly reduced by a high perveance because the thin wall thickness of the hollow beam does not experience strong radial modulation from the electric fields in the klystron and almost all of the modulation is in the axial direction. Thus, hollow electron beams can operate at high values of perveance without sacrificing efficiency. This is particularly beneficial because the hollow electron beam can operate at a reduced voltage and a much shorter interaction circuit while still maintaining a high efficiency in spite of having a perveance in the range of 3-5 micropervs.
To illustrate the benefits of the hollow beam klystron, a multi-megawatt klystron with a solid electron beam can be directly compared to an equivalent hollow beam klystron operating at the same frequency. The operating conditions and differences between the hollow beam and solid beam klystron are summarized in Table 1 below.
Based upon these operating conditions, the equivalent hollow electron beam klystron has a voltage that is 61% of the solid electron beam klystron. The lower beam voltage for the hollow electron beam klystron substantially reduces the possibility of RF arcing which can damage the electron gun and klystron. The hollow electron beam klystron also has a length that is 69% of the solid electron beam klystron. The reduction in length reduces the fabrication costs of the klystron and simplifies the installation.
In addition to the reduced electron beam voltage and circuit length, the hollow electron beam is also substantially more stable within the klystron than a solid electron beam. In the hollow beam example described above, the variation in Er between the inner diameter and the outer diameter of the beam is about 1.095:1 through the length of the klystron. Since the variation in the radial electric field Er is fairly small, the radial movement of the electrons and expansion of the hollow electron beam diameter as it passes through the klystron is minimal.
For the hollow beam klystron from Table 1,
For comparison, for the solid beam electron klystron from Table 1,
It will be understood that the inventive system has been described with reference to particular embodiments, however additions, deletions and changes could be made to these embodiments without departing from the scope of the inventive system. Although the hollow beam electron guns and klystrons that have been described include various components, it is well understood that these components and the described configuration can be modified and rearranged in various other configurations.
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind | 371c Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
PCT/US2008/004373 | 4/3/2008 | WO | 00 | 9/13/2010 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2009/123593 | 10/8/2009 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3258626 | Kino et al. | Jun 1966 | A |
3315110 | Wang | Apr 1967 | A |
3688152 | Heynisch et al. | Aug 1972 | A |
3755706 | Scott | Aug 1973 | A |
3801854 | Giebeler | Apr 1974 | A |
3853600 | Hou | Dec 1974 | A |
3916246 | Preist | Oct 1975 | A |
3921027 | Shelton et al. | Nov 1975 | A |
4425529 | Leboutet | Jan 1984 | A |
4780647 | Friedman et al. | Oct 1988 | A |
4949011 | Mann | Aug 1990 | A |
5162747 | Tammaru | Nov 1992 | A |
5461282 | Scheitrum et al. | Oct 1995 | A |
5698949 | Lien et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
6114808 | Takahashi | Sep 2000 | A |
6617791 | Symons | Sep 2003 | B2 |
6870320 | Ratzinger et al. | Mar 2005 | B2 |
6998783 | Symons | Feb 2006 | B2 |
7071604 | Dayton, Jr. | Jul 2006 | B2 |
7638946 | Kirshner et al. | Dec 2009 | B2 |
20040174211 | Symons | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20070146084 | Syratchev | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20080024065 | Yakovlev et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080042073 | Kirshner et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
1173547 | Jul 1989 | JP |
5089787 | Apr 1993 | JP |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20110006678 A1 | Jan 2011 | US |