Patent Grant
9310173
The present invention relates to an arrow systems configured to acquire flight data, relay the data to an aiming system and adjust the electronic sights based upon the collected flight data.
Accurate aiming in archery/cross bow and bow hunting of game is highly desired. Efforts have been made to utilize lasers to assist the user in improving aiming accuracy. One such attempt is disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 6,134,793 to Sauers. The '793 patent discloses a laser aided alignment system wherein a laser tip is placed on an arrow shaft and the user can adjust the bow's sights to correspond to the projection of the laser on a given target. However, the laser tip disclosed in the '793 patent is only for alignment of the bow sight. It is not for aiming a shot and is not for being shot from the bow as a projectile.
U.S. Pat. No. 7,231,721 to Minica et al. discloses a laser projecting arrowhead that can be shot as a projectile. However, the aperture through which the laser projects is offset from the center axis of the arrow. Thus, the laser beam projected on the target will not correspond to the exact spot that the tip of the arrow will first contact. The '721 patent also does not disclose any method or means for turning the laser beam on or off. Thus, the battery may be more quickly drained and the beam could be unintentionally aimed in potentially dangerous directions, such as at aircraft or other persons, while the user is on the move.
Other attempts to improve sighting relate to the sighting system. Archery sights today typically include a mechanical device mounted on a bow that has one or more pins that an archer looks across at a target to properly aim the bow. Sometimes the pins include an optic fiber that illuminates to make the pin stand out in the archer's view. In addition, some sights include a peep sight mounted to the bowstring that gives the archer two points to align, one on the bowstring and one on the sight mounted to the bow. This typically improves sighting accuracy up to 20%. The angle at which an archer holds a bow to hit a target varies based on the distance of the archer from the target and the speed of the bow (e.g., in feet per second). Sights often account for this by included several mechanical pins, each dedicated to a particular range (e.g., 10-25 yards, 25-50 yards, and so forth).
Unfortunately, modern sights have several drawbacks. For example, they are often heavy mechanical devices that weigh down the bow and increase archer fatigue, which may decrease shot accuracy over time. In addition, fiber optic pins often bend or break, resulting in decreased accuracy and ultimately replacement of the sight. Moreover, even upon making a great shot, an archer often has difficulty locating the arrow. Not only may the arrow have strayed from where the archer aimed it, but the arrow may also have hit an animal or other moving target that changes position after the shot. Also, the archer is unable to adjust the sights with precision and in real time to match the flight performance of the actual arrow.
For example, there have been several suggested solutions that employ an augmented reality display that can impose over a generated view of the downrange target with, at least, an appropriate reticule superimposed over the display of the downrange target for the purpose of suitably isolating and marking the target without reference to an actual hardware embodiment of pins or, alternately, a network of fine lines, wires, or the like placed in the focus at the eyepiece of an optical instrument placed at the focus. For example, U.S. Pat. No. 7,162,806 entitled “Video Sighting System’ granted to Swiggart on Jan. 16, 2007 envisions a video display and camera on a single mount such that the video display simply portrays what would be ordinarily visible to the eye from the general area of the rest. By overlaying mechanical pins, the sight performs much as it might without the video system.
Therefore, there remains a need to provide an improved arrow sighting system.
The present disclosure teaches various example embodiments that address certain disadvantages in the prior art. An arrow, arrowhead and method of shooting an arrowhead are disclosed. In one example embodiment, an arrowhead includes a body. The body includes an internal cavity. A plurality of blades extend outwardly from the body. A sharpened tip extends forwardly from the body, with the tip having a center axis, and an aperture formed in the tip that extends outward along the center axis of the tip. A battery housing extends rearwardly from the body and includes a rearwardly extending threaded portion. The threaded portion includes a hole defined longitudinally therethrough. The threaded portion is sectioned longitudinally into first and second halves with a slot defined between the first and second halves. A battery is disposed in the battery housing. A front laser diode is disposed in the internal cavity of the body. The front laser diode is arranged so that the laser beam emitted by the diode projects forward from the arrowhead through the aperture in the tip. The laser beam is coaxial with the center axis of the tip.
In another example embodiment, an arrow is provided. The arrow includes a hollow shaft having a front end and a rear end. A nock is disposed on the rear end of the shaft. An arrowhead is disposed at the front end of the shaft. The arrowhead includes a body having a forward end and a rearward end. It also includes a tip disposed on the forward end of the body. The tip includes a plurality of sharpened points and cutting edges. The arrowhead further includes a housing disposed on the rearward end of the body. The housing including a rearwardly extending threaded portion. The threaded portion is sectioned longitudinally into first and second halves with a slot defined between the first and second halves.
In a further example embodiment, a method of shooting an arrow is provided. The method includes indexing the arrowhead to the plurality of vanes by tightening a set screw disposed in a portion of the arrowhead. A magnet is disposed on the bow. The arrow is engaged with the bow and drawn back until a forward facing laser beam in the arrowhead turns on in response to a hall effect sensor sensing the presence of the magnet. The forward facing laser beam is turned off when the hall effect sensor does not sense the presence of the magnet.
In certain embodiments, the archery sighting system solves several problems for archers and improves shot accuracy. In some exemplary embodiments, the system captures the shot on digital video. One embodiment includes a range finder with slope detect technology to aid the archer in selecting the proper distance to the target even with inclined and declined topography. In another exemplary embodiment, a chronograph determines the speed of the arrow (e.g., in feet per second) to help tune the bow automatically. In additional embodiments, a display of the sighting system includes touch screen capabilities and electroluminescent technology to allow the archer to see-through the display. The display automatically adjusts an electronic dot based on the speed of the bow and the distance to the target. A digital camera with zoom capabilities captures video footage of the shot. The arrow for the sighting system includes a forward-mounted laser to illuminate the target with a built in 3-axis accelerometer to automatically turn the arrow on and off. The rear section of the arrow or (nock) illuminates after the shot to aid the archer in retrieving the arrow. In some embodiments, the rear facing LED also includes an IR transmitter to wirelessly send the flight information back to a separate receiver. The hunting blades can be removed to allow the archer to use the sighting system for practice, 3D/traditional archery tournaments, and small game hunting.
In aspects the present invention comprises an archery sighting system and method for placing a reticule on a display. The system in certain example embodiments includes a housing mounted in fixed relation to a bow. The housing includes a rangefinder to generate a target distance signal indicative of a target distance between the bow and a target. A display is configured to depict a reticule. A chronograph generates a bow speed indicating a bow speed at which an arrow leaves the bow. A processor receives a bow speed signal from the chronograph, a range signal from the rangefinder. In response to the signals, the processor generates a reticule pattern on the display, the reticule is positioned to indicate an attitude of the bow necessary for an arrow released from the bow at the bow speed to strike a target at the target distance.
The detailed technology and preferred embodiments implemented for the subject invention are described in the following paragraphs accompanying the appended drawings for people skilled in this field to well appreciate the features of the claimed invention. It is understood that the features mentioned hereinbefore and those to be commented on hereinafter may be used not only in the specified combinations, but also in other combinations or in isolation, without departing from the scope of the present invention.
While the invention is amenable to various modifications and alternative forms, specifics thereof have been shown by way of example in the drawings and will be described in detail. It should be understood, however, that the intention is not to limit the invention to the particular example embodiments described. On the contrary, the invention is to cover all modifications, equivalents, and alternatives falling within the spirit and scope of the invention as defined by the appended claims.
In the following description, the present invention will be explained with reference to example embodiments thereof. However, these example embodiments are not intended to limit the present invention to any specific environment, applications or particular implementations described in these example embodiments. Therefore, description of these example embodiments is only for purpose of illustration rather than limitation. It should be appreciated that, in the following example embodiments and the attached drawings, elements unrelated to the present invention are omitted from depiction; and dimensional relationships among individual elements in the attached drawings are illustrated only for ease of understanding, but not to limit the actual scale.
Referring to
Referring to
The collimating lens 110 focuses and concentrates the light beam provided by laser diode 112 so that it projects from the center axis of the arrowhead. The lens 110 also seals out water and debris from entering the body of the arrowhead. The lens 110 is disposed adjacent the first end of the body 102 and adjacent to, or partially within, the tip 104.
The lens 110 in
The front laser diode 112 provides a laser beam that projects through the lens 110 and creates a single spot on the selected target. Persons skilled in the art will recognize that a variety of suitable laser diodes may be used, including, for example a 532 nm (green laser diode) 635 nm or 650 nm (red laser diode) or other visible light wavelengths. The front laser diode 112 is disposed adjacent to the lens 110 and faces the first end of the body 102 so that the laser beam projects forward from the tip 104.
The circuit board 114 is disposed between the front laser diode 112 and the spring contact 118. The circuit board 114 includes a hall effect sensor, an accelerometer and a microprocessor. The hall effect sensor responds to a change in magnetic field, so that it can function as an on/off switch when a magnet is placed on the user's bow. For example, the magnet can be placed on the shelf of the bow near the arrow rest. Then the hall effect sensor will cause the forward laser to turn on when the archer is at full draw. The hall effect sensor will also act as a draw length check because the laser will only activate when the bow is pulled back to a specific spot. The use of a hall effect sensor in this application will eliminate the need for a kisser button to verify that the arrow has been pulled back to the proper location prior to the shot. Once the arrow is released, the hall effect sensor will sense that the magnet is no longer present, and will then turn off the front laser diode 112, thereby saving battery power.
The accelerometer included in the circuit board 114 is responsive to acceleration forces. One suitable accelerometer is a 3-axis accelerometer, model CMA 3000 from VTI Technologies or the model ADXL-345 from Analog Devices. However, other types of accelerometers may be used without departing from the scope of the invention. Using information from the accelerometer, a rear laser or light emitting diode (“led”) 122 (indicated in
The microprocessor on the circuit board includes memory and programming to carry out the various functions described in this specification. Various flight data can be recorded in the memory, including flight time, acceleration, velocity and flight distance. This data can be useful to assist a user in fine-tuning or aligning a sighting/aiming system.
The alignment screws 116 are used to secure the circuit board. The positive terminal of the batteries contacts the battery housing 106 and then the arrowhead body 102. This configuration permits the screws 116 to transfer battery power from the arrowhead body 102 to the circuit board 114. The screws 116 will also ensure that the Hall Effect sensor on the circuit board 114 will remain in a given position to the outer body of the arrowhead to allow the hall effect sensor to properly detect the small magnetic field created by the magnet that is placed on the shelf of the bow on or near the arrow rest. The screws 116 further permit the user to align the arrow head 100 with the magnet on the bow.
A spring contact 118 is disposed between the circuit board 114 and the battery 120. The spring contact 118 makes contact with the negative side of the battery 120 and completes the circuit between the battery 120 and the circuit board 114. The compression resistance of the spring 118 also aids in keeping the battery 120 and circuit board 114 restrained.
The battery 120 is disposed within the battery cavity 122 portion of the battery housing 106. One suitable battery is an encasement of three 1.2V rechargeable Ni-MH button-cell batteries, totaling 3.6V, available from VARTA. However other suitable battery configurations may be selected by one of skill in the art without departing from the scope of the invention. The battery may comprise either a single battery unit, or a multi-unit configuration.
As can be seen in
As described previously, the rear laser or led 122 will shine through the hollow shaft of the arrow and illuminate the transparent nock. Illuminating the nock using this method and configuration does not add additional weight to the rear of the arrow, which is an advantage over conventional lighted nocks. Illuminating the nock using a collimated laser diode allows the nock to become much brighter than conventional lighted nocks, which is an advantage over conventional devices.
In one particular variation, the circuit board 114, front laser diode 112 and spring contact 118 may be encased in a molding to protect the components from high g-forces. The molding can be a plastic material molded over the above-mentioned components.
Referring to
A front aperture 134 in the tip 104 of the arrowhead extends from the front of the laser diode 112 through the tip 104. This front aperture 134 permits the collimated laser light to emit from the arrowhead in a forward direction.
A rear aperture 136 in the battery housing extends from the rear laser through the end of the battery housing. This rear aperture 136 in the battery housing 106 permits the light from rear laser or led 122 to travel through the hollow shaft of the arrow to illuminate the nock.
Referring to
A slot, channel or groove 144 is defined in the outer longitudinal surface of the body 102 and spans between the front threaded portion 138 and rear threaded portion 140. Groove 144 is configured and sized to receive a blunt side edge of the blades. The grooves are disposed radially in between the facets 126.
Three set screws 146 are provided in their respective apertures in the front beveled portions 130 to permit adjustment of the aim of the front laser diode 112. Thus, the laser beam direction can be adjusted to ensure that it is co-axial with the center axis of the arrow shaft.
Referring to
The tip 104 further includes a plurality of facets or beveled portions 150 that start at the outer diameter of the converge as they approach the forward-most portion of the tip 104. The facets 150 terminate at the intersection with the front aperture 134 in three peaks or points and define a sharpened hollow tip. The hollow tip configuration is advantageous because the entire cutting diameter is sharpened, unlike tips that form a single point.
The hollow tip configuration punches a hole in the target surface, instead of the conventional 3 cut lines created by a single tip configuration. In addition, blood in target prey is less able to coagulate due to the wound shape compared to a conventional configuration. As a result, a faster bleedout is achieved from both entry and exit wounds of the prey. A faster bleedout creates an improved blood trail and a faster kill. A faster kill is more humane and makes the wounded prey easier to track. The tip 104 comprises a stainless steel material, although other materials, for example plastics and metals, can be used without departing from the scope of the invention.
Referring to
Referring to
Referring to
Referring to
Referring to
In
The magnet and hall effect sensor combination provides certain additional benefits. For example, the laser turning on indicates to the archer that a correct full draw for their arrow length has been achieved and can be used to establish good shooting habits. When hunting, the archer can purposefully over draw or under draw the bow to prevent the laser from turning on until they are ready to take a shot. This conserves battery power and prevents the laser from being on when stalking game so not to alarm the game until a shot is desired. Also, the magnet or magnets help keep the arrowhead in the correct position when at full draw. This is due to the magnetic force exerted on the ferrite material in the arrowhead blades. This stabilizing feature is particularly desired when the user is located, for example, in a tree stand and must hold the bow at a downward or rotated angle where the bow may not be level with the ground.
Referring to
Referring to
The slot permits each half 142a and 142b to flex slightly outward from the center bore 136. Thus, the thread halves are configured to expand when a set-screw 137 is inserted into the bore and tightened. The bore can be threaded to facilitate use of the set-screw. As the set screw is tightened down, the side walls of the threaded portion expand laterally outward to lock the broadhead assembly 100 into the arrow shaft.
The set screw locking feature makes the broadhead rotation adjustable or indexable with respect to the rotational orientation of the vanes of the arrow. In contrast, conventional inserts are typically glued into the arrow shaft, so existing broadheads are tightened down until they stop against the front of the insert. This does not allow the end user to align the broadhead to the arrow shaft. The present invention thus allows the end user to make fine adjustments to their broadhead to help tune the arrow and provide for better flight characteristics. For example, aligning the broadhead blades rotationally with the arrow vanes helps with arrow flight and permits the broadhead to remain in the same position (and be repeatedly used in that same orientation) after the laser beam has been aligned so that the arrow can best hit the target at a given distance.
Various embodiments of the present invention can be used in conjunction with the electronic archery sighting system disclosed in co-pending U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/757,893, entitled, “ELECTRONIC ARCHERY SIGHTING SYSTEM AND BORE SIGHTING ARROW”, filed on Apr. 9, 2010, inventor Larry Bay, the disclosure of which is hereby incorporated by reference.
Referring to
Within the shaft 512 (shown here only as a portion of the arrowhead but extending through the bore sighting laser arrow 510), a processor 533 includes at least one accelerometer (not shown) oriented to measure at least acceleration along the axis a. The inventive arrow includes a power source 536. In one presently preferred embodiment that power source is a battery producing an electrical current by means of chemical reaction such as Nickel metal hydride, Lithium Ion or Alkaline batteries. In another embodiment, a high capacity capacitor will also suitably serve as a power source as the need for large amounts of power is only of very short duration, during the nocking, flight, and immediate aftermath of the flight. One advantage of a capacitor is the very rapid charging that can occur in a charging quiver assembly.
Referring to
In one of the 3-axis embodiments, the accelerometer can further enable a “tap technology” to turn the components on or off. By tap technology, the applicant is expressing the means for activation a switch in response to a concussive blow to the bore sighting laser arrow 510 sufficient to impart an acceleration the accelerometer can sense. In response to the blow, the signal generated within the processor can suitably activate or deactivate functions of the bore sighting laser arrow 510. By way of non-limiting example, the laser may be suitably activated prior to or in the course of nocking the arrow by a tap orthogonal to axis a.
Another purpose of the accelerometer is to detect the speed of the arrow (e.g., in feet per second (FPS)). Thus, in a scenario for use, the laser 524 is turned on in response to a suitable tap by the user and then nocked to orient the arrow for flight. Because the laser is used for calibration of the system 600 and only relevant during nocking and the residence of the arrow against the arrow rest prefatory to actual flight, the laser 524 remains on until the processor 533 it turns off when the arrow reaches or exceeds a designatable speed (e.g., 150 FPS). The processor 533 may also, optionally, activate the LED/IR transmitter 18 when the arrow after initial acceleration in flight, slows to a designatable speed (e.g., 150 FPS) and thus projects a signal through the light transmitting nock assembly 515 back to the system 600. In a presently preferred embodiment, the bore sighting laser arrow 510, by means of the LED/IR transmitter 518 will send the accelerometer signal either in a raw or a processed state depending upon the specific embodiment, that data being indicative of the arrow flight acceleration data; the transmission through the light transmitting nock assembly being beamed back to a the system 600 by means of an IR receiver 602 the system 600 comprises.
In still another embodiment of the bore sighting laser arrow 510 interacting with the system, the processor 533 will, after the bore sighting laser arrow 510 has reached a designatable speed (e.g., 150 feet per second) during the speed decay of the bore sighting laser arrow 10 flight, activate the LED/IR transmitter 518, which will transmit the IR beam 521 down through the shaft of the arrow and through the light transmitting nock assembly 515. The IR beam provides a good visual tracking system for arrows during flight and allows for easy recovery of the bore sighting laser arrow 510 after the shot. The bore sighting laser arrow 510 transmitting the IR beam 521 through the light transmitting nock assembly 515 provides a beacon that can be identified with the IR receiver 602. Iterative passes over an area will provide very good directionality of the signal source emanating through the light transmitting nock 515.
The receiver 602 assists the archer in the recovery of the arrow and also receives IR beam 521 that is modulated to transmit data obtained by processor 533 characterizing the bore sighting laser arrow 510 in flight. By at least this means the system is able to obtain flight data which may include acceleration along axis a as well as any components of acceleration that are normal or orthogonal to axis a. The archery sighting system 510 allows an archer to project the laser beam along the axis a to provide a single laser dot on a target. For example, for bows that shoot over 275 FPS, the laser dot may be accurate out to 30-yards.
Referring to
The chronograph works by timing the interval between a passage of a first chronograph reference on an arrow past the chronograph sensor and a passage of a second chronograph reference on the arrow past the chronograph sensor. As the arrow leaves the bow at speed, the interval is inversely proportionate to bow speed. An optical analogue wherein the references are markings of a color and the sensor is a filtered light and photocell assembly might serve as easily as the described Hall Effect sensor might work in an equivalent analogue to sense the speed of an arrow as it leaves the rest without changing the operation of the invention. Other analogues are readily found in the field of ignition timing for internal combustion engines, the task being largely similar. Data provided the system 600 by the sensor 614 is used either to supplement the data from the accelerometer in the bore sighting laser arrow 510 or in lieu of it such that after calibration, the system 600 will function entirely without the bore sighting laser arrow 10 based upon the speed data received at the sensor 614.
Referring to
Transparent OLED displays have the further advantage that they can be suitably coated to enhance the performance of the nonactivated portions of the transparent OLED display 611. For example, the OLED display may be suitably coated with a filter coating that might, advantageously, shift in neutral density filtering of light in response to ambient light to allow the archer a better view of the target. Other alternate coating might be oleophobic coating, to prevent accumulation of oils and other debris entrapped in oils; nonscratch coating, and even diopter corrective lenses to enhance the downrange view. Additional colored filters might be advantageously used to make the filter more useful in specific environments such as in snowy environments to make the target stand out relative to the background.
The Samsung Mobile Display Corporation exhibited a suitable transparent screen at the 2010 Pepcom's Digital Experience! press event during the Consumer Electronic Show, at the Mirage Hotel on Wednesday on January 6th. The transparent OLED panel prototype, was designed for use in applications from smartphones, MP3s and very low power usage notebook computers to ‘head-up’ displays for vehicles, and advertisement displays that are interactive and eye-catching. Not only has Samsung demonstrated that when energized clear transparency when energized and even when unpowered, the prototype has up to a 40% transparency. The transparent OLED represents the highest resolution on the largest screen with high transparency, and is clearly adaptable to the instant invention.
In an alternate embodiment of the display, the sighting system 600 includes the digital camera 605 automatically starts recording when the range finder 608 has “locked” onto the target. In such a manner, the digital camera 605 can be suitably employed to present the same augmented reality experience as the presently preferred embodiment provides to the archer. An augmented reality system incorporates input garnered from a number of sensors to create suitable information cues to be projected upon an image thereby to generate a composite image that bears more information to be positioned in a manner to give geospatial meaning to the presentation of that information. The operation of the elements typically employed in an augmented reality system as well as the calibration required of such a system is described by: Ahlers et al., in “Calibration Requirements and Procedures for a Monitor-based Augmented Reality System”, IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics, 1 (3): 255-273, 1995; Navab et al., in “Single Point Active Alignment Method (SPAAM) for Calibrating an Optical See-through Head Mounted Display”, Proc. of the IEEE International Symposium on Augmented Reality, ISAR '00, Munich, Germany, October 2000; Sauer et al., “Augmented Workspace: Designing an AR Testbed”, Proc. of the IEEE International Symposium on Augmented Reality, ISAR '00, Munich, Germany, October 2000; Poston et al., Dextrous Virtual Work, May 1996, Communication of the ACM, vol. 39, No. 5, pp. 37-45; and Koller et al., Real-time Vision-Based Camera Tracking for Augmented Reality Applications, ACM, 1997, pp. 87-94; Billinghurst et al., The Expert Surgical Assistant: An Intelligent Virtual Environment with Multimodal Input, Proceedings of Medicine Meets Virtual Reality IV, pp. 590-607.
Referring now to
In the presently preferred embodiment, the display is a touch screen 613 such that the display 611 also fulfills the keyboard 612 functionality. The touch screen display 613 is one option for providing a hardware interface between the user and the system 600. Control wheels, jog wheels, trackballs, and joysticks might also be used in concert with or in lieu of the keyboard 612 to fulfill the inputting function. In some embodiments of the system 600, the display 611 is a plurality of displays. For purposes of explanation of these several embodiments of the system 600, the discussion of the one or more of the plurality of the displays 611 and the user interaction with the keyboard 612, will be set forth by way of nonlimiting exemplary embodiment using the touch-sensitive screen assembly or touch screen 613 as comprising both the keyboard 612 and the display 611 of the user hardware interface.
Within the housing, there are, additionally a central processor 620 connected to memory, an oscillator 615 to provide a time hack to the chronograph sensor 614 to provide the function of the chronograph 616, an attitude sensor 626 to detect the attitude of the system relative to level, and a power supply 621. In an embodiment, there is additionally a communications port 623 that might either be a hardware port such as a Uniform Serial Bus (USB) port or a radio communications port such as a Bluetooth™ port. In either regard, the port allows communication with the system, either for downloading data accumulated in memory 623 during use or for uploading information such as firmware updates to the memory 623. Each of these components will be referred to throughout the explanation of the method 700 of using the system 600 and are provided here to better define the interaction of the hardware components.
As an arrow shot from a bow is essentially a ballistic projectile. As such, the single biggest variable in performance of the bow will be the speed at which the arrow leaves the bow. Generally speaking the 300 fps mark seems to be the benchmark for high performance in the archery market. As a matter of consumer perception, a bow that shoots under 300 fps is generally considered slow, while a bow that shoots over 300 fps considered fast. Manufacturers generally rate their bows using the same IBO (International Bowhunting Organization) Standard. To get an accurate IBO Speed rating, manufacturers must test their bows under the same preset conditions: setting the bow for exactly 70# Peak Draw Weight, exactly 30″ Draw Length, and they must shoot a test arrow that weighs precisely 350 grains. This levels the playing field on basic settings, so the differences in IBO scores reflect other design attributes (brace height, cam aggressive, bow efficiency, etc.).
Stated speed is not, however, the speed at which a particular archer using a particular bow to fire a particular arrow. Habits of an archer affect the speed. On the most basic level, there are three main components of actual arrow speed: draw weight, draw length, and arrow mass. The higher the draw weight—the faster the arrow will shoot. The longer the draw length—the faster the arrow will shoot. And the lighter the arrow—the faster it will go. So for the purposes of testing, a slick manufacturer could setup a particular model bow and establish their bow's advertised speed using an unrealistic 100# draw weight, 32″ draw length, and shoot an anorexic 250 grain arrow. None of this helps to determine what this particular archer can do.
For this purpose, the method 700 commences at a block 701 where the processor 620 generates a prompt on the display 611 to the user to enter a bow speed. The user may either enter a known bow speed, based upon the user's own experience with the bow, through the keyboard 612 or elect to test the speed using the chronograph 616 and elects to do so at a block 704. Should the archer elect not to test the bow speed, the archer enters the speed, by means of the keyboard 612 at a block 707. Once stored, the element of speed is now configurably stored until the archer elects to retest the speed.
Referring to
The housing 601 is fixed to the mount 626 in the archer's best approximation of suitable alignment relative to the bow 620 and arrow rest 623. Once mounted, the archer will now fine tune the mount in accord with the mount 626 calibration method 800.
At a block 803, the archer nocks the bore sighting laser arrow 510 and draws the bow to full draw in accord with the archer's regular recurrent pattern of shooting. As with any form of shooting, repetition with precise accuracy is the key. The United States Marine Corps teaches this using the Breathe, Relax, Aim, Slack, Squeeze (or B.R.A.S.S. for short) in Primary Marksmanship instruction. One of the major goals of this technique is to achieve the proper mindset for taking a shot at a target. Practicing these steps repetitively leads to consistency in performance. The archer at this block is to pull the arrow back as the archer does as consistently with the archer's normal shooting either on the range or in the field.
Similarly the archer, at a block 806, sights in on a known target in accord with the system 600 in its state without stored reticule locations (storing is discussed in association with
At a block 809, the archer observes the indicated distance on the rangefinder 608 as shown on the display 611. If the rangefinder and the known distance agree, the archer has achieved the suitable mounting and there is no reason to further perform the method 800 for calibrating the position of the housing 601 relative to the bow on the mount.
Where the distance does not agree, the archer will begin a seek for the target by swinging the bow relative to the target to find the precise position necessary in order to make the rangefinder distance correspond to the known distance. The precise position of the housing 601 relative to the target is found at a block 812. In most instances, if the archer has suitably aligned the housing relative to the target, the precise block 812 position necessary will not be a great departure from the block 806 position. While in the precise block 812 position, the archer notes the second position of the laser dot relative to the target. The archer observes the vector that represents the displacement of the laser dot from the block 806 position to the 812 position at a block 815. At a block 818, the archer adjusts the mount in accord with the vector that represents the displacement of the laser dot from the block 806 position to the 812 position at a block 815. Once adjusted, at a block 821, the archer again sights in on the target as in the block 806. At a block 824, the archer observes whether the rangefinder distance now corresponds to the known distance. If, at the block 824, the archer is satisfied, the archer then locks the housing on the mount relative the bow at a block 827. If the archer is not satisfied at the block 824, the method 800 is iterated to further fine tune the position of the housing 601 relative to the bow until at the block 824, the archer is satisfied and progresses to the block 827 to fix the housing relative to the bow.
Once the housing 601 is fixed relative to the bow in accord with the method 800, the archer will advantageously place electronic pins for known distances and in accord with the distance stored in accord with the method 700 at the block 722. In conventional sighting of a bow, the fixed pin sight is the most common and the more popular choice among bowhunters. A fixed pin sight usually has 3-5 individual pins, and each pin can be set for a particular distance. The top pin for the closest distance and the bottom pin for the furthest distance. Once set they remain fixed in a particular position.
In conventional use of the fixed pin sights, the set up and adjustments on a fixed pin are pretty simple, but at the same time requires a little trial and error to get the perfect setting. Most archers will set this type of sight at easy to remember distances like 5 or 10 yards and once set, shooting one of the set distances is a very easy. The challenging part comes when shooting an unknown distance, where an archer must extrapolate a position between two bracketing distances based upon an estimate of the distance to the target. There are many variables that come into play here, uneven ground, an elevated position and dense foliage.
The inventive sight will extrapolate the distance based upon the rangefinder distance as the mount has been suitably fixed relative to the bow at the block 827. In the method 900, the archer will establish at least a first known reticule position based upon a first known target distance and a second known reticule position based upon a second known distance. The purpose of the first known reticule position and the second known reticule position is to establish for a standard arrow flying in still air at a known temperature, the characteristic flight path. Once known, the invention can suitably extrapolate a reticule position based upon distances distinct from either the first known target distance and the second known target distance. As discussed below, the processor 620 can use statistical methods to vary a reticule position based upon variations in arrows, angle of a line from the bow to the target relative to a horizon, a wind speed vector, or an ambient air temperature.
The archer nocks a first practice arrow and extends to full draw at a block 902. As at the block 806, the archer directs the bow at the target at a block 905. As an optional step, the archer, may, at a block 908, check the rangefinder as the distance is shown on the display 611 for correspondence with the known distance. At a block 911, the archer shoots the practice arrow at the target, for effect in accord with an unmodified reticule positioned in accord with the known distance. The purpose is to find out where the archer shoots arrows when shooting in accord with the reticule as currently positioned in its “factory default” position.
The archer will iterate the shooting of practice arrows until at a block 914, the archer is satisfied that the shot arrows are arrayed in a suitable pattern. Referring to
The archer iterates the process from the block 902 to block 917 for a number of selected distances at the block 920. Once collected, the several reticule positions represent a curve in space where an x- and y-axis reticule position displacement is a function of distance. The processor 620 smoothly constructs, using known statistical methods, that curve through all usable distances of the bow at a block 929. Given that constructed curve, the reticule in use is positioned for the archer based upon the rangefinder distance to target.
Referring now to
The system may include variations in addition to those described herein. Those of ordinary skill in the art will recognize numerous modifications and substitutions that can be made to the components described herein to achieve similar results. While the preferred embodiment of the invention has been illustrated and described, as noted above, many changes can be made without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention.
In alternate embodiments, the processor 620 turns the camera 605 turns off after an optional proximity sensor has not detected an arrow for a certain period (e.g., 10 seconds). The system 600 may also include an attitude sensor that automatically adjusts the reticule based on the distance and slope (incline or decline) sensed at an attitude sensor 626 that indicates the slope of a path from the archer to the target.
In still another alternative embodiment, the camera is also used to collect video clips or photos of targets shot in time relative to the release of the arrow. Exploiting the range finder, the processor 620 may also automatically adjusts the zoom of the camera 605 as the objective lens is set according to distance; a more complex objective lens can also be autofocused in accord with the distance sensed at the rangefinder.
The processor 620 can be configured to modify the image generated on the display 611 such that the archer can select what data to view on the lower portion of the sighting system. Programmable buttons are also possible through processor 620 configuration of a touch screen display 613. For example, the touch screen display 613 is capable of displaying various information such as FPS, distance to the target (e.g., in yards or meters), and a battery life indicator as well as a digital level. The touch screen display 613 may also be optionally configured to include a digital compass, barometer, thermometer, wind direction, and wind speed. Each of these has a known effect upon the arrow and no new algorithm is set forth here for reckoning that effect. Nonetheless, the processor 620 is configured to suitably displace the reticule 617 upon the display 611 relative to each of these factors individually or the factors in concert. In one embodiment, the characterizing of the bore sighting laser arrow 510 in flight is additionally based on accelerometer reading transmitted to the system by IR/LED transmitter 518.
In further embodiments, the system 600 may include a remote wired or wireless button that the archer can attach to the grip of the bow or other convenient location and may use it to augment the keyboard. Thus, in this exemplary embodiment, when the archer presses the button, the range finder 608 scans for distance. Once the archer releases the button 513, the range finder 608 will “lock,” and in response, the system 600 will display an reticule based on the correct distance to the target, and, in a further embodiment, the camera 605 will begin capturing video.
Throughout this application, reference is made to the sport of archery and this sighting system is described to include a bow and an arrow. There is nothing that limits the use of the sighting system to archery applications. It is envisioned that, for example, the same system might be used to aim a rifle or handgun; automatic weaponry, such as an automatic rifle; or even a cross-bow. The archery example has been selected as a non-limiting means of explaining more universal principles that are shared in use on any ballistic weapon. For example, the relation of the mount to the sighting system and thus to the weapon is the same whether the weapon is a black-powder rifle or, as here, a bow. Bore-sighting is, likewise, bore-sighting whether on a rifle or, as here, on a bow. This invention is not, therefore, limited to archery applications.
The above disclosure is related to the detailed technical contents and inventive features thereof. People skilled in this field may proceed with a variety of modifications and replacements based on the disclosures and suggestions of the invention as described without departing from the characteristics thereof. For example, the invention is also applicable to cross bows, spear fishing guns and other projectiles that would benefit from a laser aiming pointed tip. Nevertheless, although such modifications and replacements are not fully disclosed in the above descriptions, they have substantially been covered in the following claims as appended.
This application is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/273,932, filed Oct. 14, 2011, which is a continuation-in-part of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/757,401, filed on Apr. 9, 2010, now U.S. Pat. No. 8,251,845, which claims priority benefit of U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 61/168,105, filed on Apr. 9, 2009, and the disclosures of each of the foregoing are hereby incorporated by reference herein in their entirety.
| Number | Name | Date | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 3641675 | Funk, Jr. | Feb 1972 | A |
| 4340930 | Carissimi | Jul 1982 | A |
| 4547837 | Bennett | Oct 1985 | A |
| RE32123 | Knight | Apr 1986 | E |
| 4621817 | Musacchia | Nov 1986 | A |
| 5134552 | Call et al. | Jul 1992 | A |
| 5141229 | Roundy | Aug 1992 | A |
| 5175651 | Marron et al. | Dec 1992 | A |
| 5419050 | Moore | May 1995 | A |
| 5634278 | London | Jun 1997 | A |
| 5871410 | Simo et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
| 6005719 | Rando | Dec 1999 | A |
| 6027421 | Adams, Jr. | Feb 2000 | A |
| 6040566 | Rioland et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
| 6077179 | Liechty, II | Jun 2000 | A |
| 6123631 | Ginder | Sep 2000 | A |
| 6134793 | Sauers | Oct 2000 | A |
| 6165086 | Liechty, II | Dec 2000 | A |
| 6171206 | Liechty, II | Jan 2001 | B1 |
| 6258000 | Liechty, II | Jul 2001 | B1 |
| 6287223 | Liechty, II | Sep 2001 | B1 |
| 6287224 | Liechty, II | Sep 2001 | B1 |
| 6306053 | Liechty, II | Oct 2001 | B1 |
| 6366344 | Lach | Apr 2002 | B1 |
| 6390642 | Simonton | May 2002 | B1 |
| 6409617 | Armold | Jun 2002 | B1 |
| 6428433 | Liechty, II | Aug 2002 | B1 |
| 6428434 | Liechty, II | Aug 2002 | B1 |
| 6490060 | Tai et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
| 6526666 | Lastinger, Jr. | Mar 2003 | B1 |
| 6622392 | Bourget | Sep 2003 | B1 |
| 6743128 | Liechty, II | Jun 2004 | B2 |
| 6755758 | Liechty, II | Jun 2004 | B2 |
| 6758774 | Liechty, II | Jul 2004 | B2 |
| 6851197 | Terry et al. | Feb 2005 | B2 |
| 6997716 | Skala et al. | Feb 2006 | B2 |
| 7216643 | Pellerite | May 2007 | B2 |
| 7231721 | Minica et al. | Jun 2007 | B2 |
| 7241236 | Chen | Jul 2007 | B1 |
| 7313871 | Lines et al. | Jan 2008 | B2 |
| 7314419 | Grace, Jr. et al. | Jan 2008 | B2 |
| 7316625 | Takahashi | Jan 2008 | B2 |
| 7409770 | Jones | Aug 2008 | B2 |
| 7837580 | Huang et al. | Nov 2010 | B2 |
| 7927240 | Lynch | Apr 2011 | B2 |
| 7931550 | Lynch | Apr 2011 | B2 |
| 7972230 | Donahoe | Jul 2011 | B2 |
| 7993224 | Brywig | Aug 2011 | B2 |
| 8221273 | Donahoe | Jul 2012 | B2 |
| 8251845 | Bay | Aug 2012 | B2 |
| 8657709 | Bay | Feb 2014 | B2 |
| 20020197584 | Kendir et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
| 20030063959 | Kao | Apr 2003 | A1 |
| 20040014010 | Swensen et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
| 20050278964 | Minica et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
| 20110172039 | Donahoe et al. | Jul 2011 | A1 |
| Entry |
|---|
| U.S. Appl. No. 61/293,504, filed Jan. 8, 2010; 56 pages. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 61/293,757, filed Jan. 11, 2010; 104 pages. |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 20140171238 A1 | Jun 2014 | US |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 61168105 | Apr 2009 | US |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Parent | 13273932 | Oct 2011 | US |
| Child | 14187296 | US |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Parent | 12757401 | Apr 2010 | US |
| Child | 13273932 | US |
