Holographic waveguides incorporating birefringence control and methods for their fabrication

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 11726261
  • Patent Number
    11,726,261
  • Date Filed
    Monday, October 18, 2021
    2 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, August 15, 2023
    8 months ago
Abstract
Many embodiments in accordance with the invention are directed towards waveguides implementing birefringence control. In some embodiments, the waveguide includes a birefringent grating layer and a birefringence control layer. In further embodiments, the birefringence control layer is compact and efficient. Such structures can be utilized for various applications, including but not limited to: compensating for polarization related losses in holographic waveguides; providing three-dimensional LC director alignment in waveguides based on Bragg gratings; and spatially varying angular/spectral bandwidth for homogenizing the output from a waveguide. In some embodiments, a polarization-maintaining, wide-angle, and high-reflection waveguide cladding with polarization compensation is implemented for grating birefringence. In several embodiments, a thin polarization control layer is implemented for providing either quarter wave or half wave retardation.
Description
FIELD OF THE INVENTION

The present disclosure relates to optical waveguides and more particularly to waveguide displays using birefringent gratings.


BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

Waveguides can be referred to as structures with the capability of confining and guiding waves (i.e., restricting the spatial region in which waves can propagate). One subclass includes optical waveguides, which are structures that can guide electromagnetic waves, typically those in the visible spectrum. Waveguide structures can be designed to control the propagation path of waves using a number of different mechanisms. For example, planar waveguides can be designed to utilize diffraction gratings to diffract and couple incident light into the waveguide structure such that the in-coupled light can proceed to travel within the planar structure via total internal reflection (“TIR”).


Fabrication of waveguides can include the use of material systems that allow for the recording of holographic optical elements within the waveguides. One class of such material includes polymer dispersed liquid crystal (“PDLC”) mixtures, which are mixtures containing photopolymerizable monomers and liquid crystals. A further subclass of such mixtures includes holographic polymer dispersed liquid crystal (“HPDLC”) mixtures. Holographic optical elements, such as volume phase gratings, can be recorded in such a liquid mixture by illuminating the material with two mutually coherent laser beams. During the recording process, the monomers polymerize and the mixture undergoes a photopolymerization-induced phase separation, creating regions densely populated by liquid crystal micro-droplets, interspersed with regions of clear polymer. The alternating liquid crystal-rich and liquid crystal-depleted regions form the fringe planes of the grating.


Waveguide optics, such as those described above, can be considered for a range of display and sensor applications. In many applications, waveguides containing one or more grating layers encoding multiple optical functions can be realized using various waveguide architectures and material systems, enabling new innovations in near-eye displays for augmented reality (“AR”) and virtual reality (“VR”), compact heads-up displays (“HUDs”) for aviation and road transport, and sensors for biometric and laser radar (“LIDAR”) applications.


SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

Following below are more detailed descriptions of various concepts related to, and embodiments of, an inventive optical display and methods for displaying information. It should be appreciated that various concepts introduced above and discussed in greater detail below may be implemented in any of numerous ways, as the disclosed concepts are not limited to any particular manner of implementation. Examples of specific implementations and applications are provided primarily for illustrative purposes. A more complete understanding of the invention can be obtained by considering the following detailed description in conjunction with the accompanying drawings, wherein like index numerals indicate like parts. For purposes of clarity, details relating to technical material that is known in the technical fields related to the invention have not been described in detail.


One embodiment includes a waveguide including at least one waveguide substrate, at least one birefringent grating; at least one birefringence control layer, a light source for outputting light, an input coupler for directing the light into total internal reflection paths within the waveguide, and an output coupler for extracting light from the waveguide, wherein the interaction of the light with the birefringence control layer and the birefringent grating provides a predefined characteristic of light extracted from the waveguide.


In another embodiment, the interaction of light with the birefringence control layer provides at least one of: an angular or spectral bandwidth variation, a polarization rotation, a birefringence variation, an angular or spectral dependence of at least one of beam transmission or polarization rotation, and a light transmission variation in at least one direction in the plane of the waveguide substrate.


In a further embodiment, the predefined characteristic varies across the waveguide.


In still another embodiment, the predefined characteristic results from the cumulative effect of the interaction of the light with the birefringence control layer and the birefringent grating along at least one direction of light propagation within the waveguide.


In a still further embodiment, the predefined characteristic includes at least one of: uniform illumination and uniform polarization over the angular range of the light.


In yet another embodiment, the birefringence control layer provides compensation for polarization rotation introduced by the birefringent grating along at least one direction of light propagation within the waveguide.


In a yet further embodiment, the birefringence control layer is a liquid crystal and polymer material system.


In another additional embodiment, the birefringence control layer is a liquid crystal and polymer system aligned using directional ultraviolet radiation.


In a further additional embodiment, the birefringence control layer is aligned by at least one of: electromagnetic radiation, electrical or magnetic fields, mechanical forces, chemical reaction, and thermal exposure.


In another embodiment again, the birefringence control layer influences the alignment of LC directors in a birefringent grating formed in a liquid crystal and polymer system.


In a further embodiment again, the birefringence control layer has an anisotropic refractive index.


In still yet another embodiment, the birefringence control layer is formed on at least one internal or external optical surface of the waveguide.


In a still yet further embodiment, the birefringence control layer includes at least one stack of refractive index layers disposed on at least one optical surface of the waveguide, wherein at least one layer in the stack of refractive index layers has an isotropic refractive index and at least one layer in the stack of refractive index layers has an anisotropic refractive index.


In still another additional embodiment, the birefringence control layer provides a high reflection layer.


In a still further additional embodiment, the birefringence control layer provides optical power.


In still another embodiment again, the birefringence control layer provides an environmental isolation layer for the waveguide.


In a still further embodiment again, the birefringence control layer has a gradient index structure.


In yet another additional embodiment, the birefringence control layer is formed by stretching a layer of an optical material to spatially vary its refractive index in the plane of the waveguide substrate.


In a yet further additional embodiment, the light source provides collimated light in angular space.


In yet another embodiment again, at least one of the input coupler and output coupler includes a birefringent grating.


In a yet further embodiment again, the birefringent grating is recorded in a material system including at least one polymer and at least one liquid crystal.


In another additional embodiment again, the at least one birefringent grating includes at least one birefringent grating for providing at least one of the functions of: beam expansion in a first direction, beam expansion in a second direction and light extraction from the waveguide, and coupling light from the source into a total internal reflection path in the waveguide.


In a further additional embodiment again, the light source includes a laser, and the alignment of LC directors in the birefringent grating spatially vary to compensate for illumination banding.


A still yet another additional embodiment includes a method of fabricating a waveguide, the method including providing a first transparent substrate, depositing a layer of grating recording material, exposing the layer of grating recording material to form a grating layer, forming a birefringence control layer, and applying a second transparent substrate.


In a still yet further additional embodiment, the layer of grating recording material is deposited onto the substrate, the birefringence control layer is formed on the grating layer, and the second transparent substrate is applied over the birefringence control layer.


In yet another additional embodiment again, the layer of grating recording material is deposited onto the substrate, the second transparent substrate is applied over the grating layer, and the birefringence control layer is formed on second transparent substrate.


In a yet further additional embodiment again, the birefringence control layer is formed on the first transparent substrate, the layer of grating recording material is deposited onto the birefringence control layer, and the second transparent substrate is applied over the grating layer.


In still yet another embodiment again, the method further includes depositing a layer of liquid crystal polymer material and aligning the liquid crystal polymer material using directional UV light, wherein the layer of grating recording material is deposited onto the substrate and the second transparent substrate is applied over the aligned liquid crystal polymer layer.


In a still yet further embodiment again, the layer of liquid crystal polymer material is deposited onto one of either the grating layer or the second transparent substrate.


In still yet another additional embodiment again, the layer of liquid crystal polymer material is deposited onto the first transparent substrate, the layer of grating recording material is deposited onto the aligned liquid crystal polymer material, and the second transparent substrate is applied over the grating layer.


Additional embodiments and features are set forth in part in the description that follows, and in part will become apparent to those skilled in the art upon examination of the specification or may be learned by the practice of the invention. A further understanding of the nature and advantages of the present invention may be realized by reference to the remaining portions of the specification and the drawings, which forms a part of this disclosure.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

These and other features and advantages of the present invention will be better understood by reference to the following detailed description when considered in conjunction with the accompanying data and figures, wherein:



FIG. 1 conceptually illustrates a schematic cross section view of a waveguide incorporating a birefringent grating and birefringence control layer in accordance with an embodiment of the invention.



FIG. 2 conceptually illustrates a schematic cross section view of a waveguide incorporating a birefringent grating and birefringence control layer for compensating grating birefringence in accordance with some embodiments of the invention.



FIG. 3 conceptually illustrates a schematic cross section view of a waveguide incorporating a birefringent grating and birefringence control layer for providing uniform output illumination from the waveguide in accordance with an embodiment of the invention.



FIG. 4 conceptually illustrates a schematic cross section view of a birefringence control layer formed by a multilayer structure combining isotropic and anisotropic index layers in accordance with an embodiment of the invention.



FIG. 5 conceptually illustrates a schematic cross section view of a birefringence control layer formed by a multilayer structure combining isotropic and anisotropic index layers integrated with a birefringent grating layer in accordance with an embodiment of the invention.



FIG. 6 conceptually illustrates a plan view of a dual expansion waveguide with birefringent control layers in accordance with an embodiment of the invention.



FIG. 7 conceptually illustrates a schematic cross section view of a waveguide incorporating a birefringent grating and birefringence control layer for correcting birefringence introduced by an optical element in the output light path from the waveguide in accordance with an embodiment of the invention.



FIG. 8 conceptually illustrates a schematic plan view of an apparatus for aligning a birefringence control layer by applying forces to the edges of the layer in accordance with an embodiment of the invention.



FIGS. 9A-9F conceptually illustrate the process steps and apparatus for fabricating a waveguide containing a birefringent grating and a birefringence control layer in accordance with various embodiments of the invention.



FIGS. 10A-10F conceptually illustrate the process steps and apparatus for fabricating a waveguide containing a birefringent grating with a birefringence control layer applied to an outer surface of the waveguide in accordance with various embodiments of the invention.



FIGS. 11A-11F conceptually illustrate the process steps and apparatus for fabricating a waveguide containing a birefringent grating and a birefringence control layer in accordance with various embodiments of the invention.



FIG. 12 conceptually illustrates a flow chart showing a method of fabricating a waveguide containing a birefringent grating and a birefringence control layer in accordance with an embodiment of the invention.



FIG. 13 conceptually illustrates a flow chart showing a method of fabricating a waveguide containing a birefringent grating and a birefringence control layer applied to an outer surface of the waveguide in accordance with an embodiment of the invention.



FIG. 14 conceptually illustrates a flow chart showing a method of fabricating a waveguide containing a birefringent grating and a birefringence control layer where forming the birefringence control layer is carried out before the recording of the grating layer in accordance with an embodiment of the invention.



FIG. 15 conceptually illustrates a schematic side view of a waveguide with a birefringence control layer applied at the waveguide to air interface in accordance with an embodiment of the invention.



FIG. 16 conceptually illustrates a schematic side view of a waveguide with a birefringence control layer that isolates the waveguide from its environment applied to the waveguide to air interface in accordance with an embodiment of the invention.



FIG. 17 conceptually illustrates a schematic side view of an apparatus for fabricating a structure containing a birefringent grating layer overlaying a birefringence control layer where the grating recording beams propagate through the birefringence control layer in accordance with an embodiment of the invention.



FIG. 18 conceptually illustrates a schematic side view of an apparatus for fabricating a structure containing a birefringence control layer overlaying a birefringent grating layer where the birefringence control layer is aligned by UV radiation propagating through the grating in accordance with an embodiment of the invention.



FIG. 19 conceptually illustrates a cross section of waveguide containing substrates sandwiching a grating layer.



FIG. 20 conceptually illustrates a waveguide with a quarter wave polarization layer inserted in accordance with an embodiment of the invention.



FIG. 21 conceptually illustrates a schematic cross section view showing a portion of a waveguide illustrating the use of a quarter wave polarization layer with a RKV grating in accordance with an embodiment of the invention.



FIG. 22 conceptually illustrates a polarization layer architecture containing an LCP quarter wave cell and a reactive monomer liquid crystal mixture (RMLCM) cell separated by index matching oil layer in accordance with an embodiment of the invention.



FIG. 23 conceptually illustrates an example of a polarization architecture based on a grating cell with the RMLCM grating material layer in direct contact with a bare LCP film in accordance with an embodiment of the invention.



FIG. 24 conceptually illustrates a cross section view schematically showing an example of polarization layer architecture in which a bare LCP layer is bonded to a bare RMLCM layer in accordance with an embodiment of the invention.



FIG. 25 conceptually illustrates a cross section view schematically showing an example of a polarization layer architecture using a RMLCM layer as a polarization layer in accordance with an embodiment of the invention.



FIG. 26 conceptually illustrates an example of a polarization layer architecture that includes a feature for compensating for polarization rotation introduced by birefringent gratings in accordance with an embodiment of the invention.



FIG. 27 conceptually illustrates a plan view schematically showing a waveguide display incorporating the features of the embodiment of FIG. 26 in accordance with an embodiment of the invention.



FIGS. 28 and 29 conceptually illustrate cross section views schematically showing examples of polarization layer architectures containing an upper substrate, an LCP layer with hard encapsulation layer, a RMLCM layer, and a lower substrate in accordance with various embodiments of the invention.



FIG. 30 conceptually illustrates a plan view schematically showing a first example of a two-region polymer film in accordance with an embodiment of the invention.



FIG. 31 conceptually illustrates a plan view schematically showing a second example of a two-region polymer film in accordance with an embodiment of the invention.



FIG. 32 conceptually illustrates a plan view schematically showing a third example of a two-region polymer film in accordance with an embodiment of the invention.



FIG. 33 conceptually illustrates a drawing showing a clear aperture layout in accordance with an embodiment of the invention.



FIG. 34 conceptually illustrates a plan view schematically showing a waveguide containing input, fold, and output gratings including the K-vectors and alignment layer fast axis directions for each grating in accordance with an embodiment of the invention.





DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION

For the purposes of describing embodiments, some well-known features of optical technology known to those skilled in the art of optical design and visual displays have been omitted or simplified in order to not obscure the basic principles of the invention. Unless otherwise stated, the term “on-axis” in relation to a ray or a beam direction refers to propagation parallel to an axis normal to the surfaces of the optical components described in relation to the invention. In the following description the terms light, ray, beam, and direction may be used interchangeably and in association with each other to indicate the direction of propagation of electromagnetic radiation along rectilinear trajectories. The term light and illumination may be used in relation to the visible and infrared bands of the electromagnetic spectrum. Parts of the following description will be presented using terminology commonly employed by those skilled in the art of optical design. In the following description, the term grating may be used to refer to any kind of diffractive structure used in a waveguide, including holograms and Bragg or volume holograms. The term grating may also encompass a grating that includes of a set of gratings. For example, in some embodiments the input grating and output grating each include two or more gratings multiplexed into a single layer. For illustrative purposes, it is to be understood that the drawings are not drawn to scale unless stated otherwise.


Referring generally to the drawings, systems and methods relating to waveguide applications incorporating birefringence control in accordance with various embodiments of the invention are illustrated. Birefringence is the optical property of a material having a refractive index that depends on the polarization and propagation direction of light. A birefringent grating can be referred to as a grating having such properties. In many cases, the birefringent grating is formed in a liquid crystal polymer material system such as but not limited to HPDLC mixtures. The polarization properties of such a grating can depend on average relative permittivity and relative permittivity modulation tensors.


Many embodiments in accordance with the invention are directed towards waveguides implementing birefringence control. In some embodiments, the waveguide includes a birefringent grating layer and a birefringence control layer. In further embodiments, the birefringence control layer is compact and efficient. Such structures can be utilized for various applications, including but not limited to: compensating for polarization related losses in holographic waveguides; providing three-dimensional LC director alignment in waveguides based on Bragg gratings; and spatially varying angular/spectral bandwidth for homogenizing the output from a waveguide. In some embodiments, a polarization-maintaining, wide-angle, and high-reflection waveguide cladding with polarization compensation is implemented for grating birefringence. In several embodiments, a thin polarization control layer is implemented for providing either quarter wave or half wave retardation. In a number of embodiments, a polarization-maintaining, wide-angle birefringence control layer is implemented for modifying the polarization output of a waveguide to balance the birefringence of an external optical element used with the waveguide.


In many embodiments, the waveguide includes at least one input grating and at least one output grating. In further embodiments, the waveguide can include additional gratings for various purposes, such as but not limited to fold gratings for beam expansion. The input grating and output grating may each include multiplexed gratings. In some embodiments, the input grating and output grating may each include two overlapping gratings layers that are in contact or vertically separated by one or more thin optical substrate. In some embodiments, the grating layers are sandwiched between glass or plastic substrates. In some embodiments two or more such gratings layers may form a stack within which total internal reflection occurs at the outer substrate and air interfaces. In some embodiments, the waveguide may include just one grating layer. In some embodiments, electrodes may be applied to faces of the substrates to switch gratings between diffracting and clear states. The stack may further include additional layers such as beam splitting coatings and environmental protection layers. The input and output gratings shown in the drawings may be provided by any of the above described grating configurations. Advantageously, the input and output gratings can be designed to have common surface grating pitch. In cases where the waveguide contains grating(s) in addition to the input and output gratings, the gratings can be designed to have grating pitches such that the vector sum of the grating vectors is substantially zero. The input grating can combine gratings orientated such that each grating diffracts a polarization of the incident unpolarized light into a waveguide path. The output gratings can be configured in a similar fashion such that the light from the waveguide paths is combined and coupled out of the waveguide as unpolarized light. Each grating is characterized by at least one grating vector (or K-vector) in 3D space, which in the case of a Bragg grating is defined as the vector normal to the Bragg fringes. The grating vector can determine the optical efficiency for a given range of input and diffracted angles. In some embodiments, the waveguide includes at least one surface relief grating. Waveguide gratings structures, materials systems, and birefringence control are discussed below in further detail.


Switchable Bragg Gratings


Optical structures recorded in waveguides can include many different types of optical elements, such as but not limited to diffraction gratings. In many embodiments, the grating implemented is a Bragg grating (also referred to as a volume grating). Bragg gratings can have high efficiency with little light being diffracted into higher orders. The relative amount of light in the diffracted and zero order can be varied by controlling the refractive index modulation of the grating, a property that is can be used to make lossy waveguide gratings for extracting light over a large pupil. One class of gratings used in holographic waveguide devices is the Switchable Bragg Grating (“SBG”). SBGs can be fabricated by first placing a thin film of a mixture of photopolymerizable monomers and liquid crystal material between glass plates or substrates. In many cases, the glass plates are in a parallel configuration. One or both glass plates can support electrodes, typically transparent tin oxide films, for applying an electric field across the film. The grating structure in an SBG can be recorded in the liquid material (often referred to as the syrup) through photopolymerization-induced phase separation using interferential exposure with a spatially periodic intensity modulation. Factors such as but not limited to control of the irradiation intensity, component volume fractions of the materials in the mixture, and exposure temperature can determine the resulting grating morphology and performance. As can readily be appreciated, a wide variety of materials and mixtures can be used depending on the specific requirements of a given application. In many embodiments, HPDLC material is used. During the recording process, the monomers polymerize and the mixture undergoes a phase separation. The LC molecules aggregate to form discrete or coalesced droplets that are periodically distributed in polymer networks on the scale of optical wavelengths. The alternating liquid crystal-rich and liquid crystal-depleted regions form the fringe planes of the grating, which can produce Bragg diffraction with a strong optical polarization resulting from the orientation ordering of the LC molecules in the droplets.


The resulting volume phase grating can exhibit very high diffraction efficiency, which can be controlled by the magnitude of the electric field applied across the film. When an electric field is applied to the grating via transparent electrodes, the natural orientation of the LC droplets can change, causing the refractive index modulation of the fringes to lower and the hologram diffraction efficiency to drop to very low levels. Typically, the electrodes are configured such that the applied electric field will be perpendicular to the substrates. In a number of embodiments, the electrodes are fabricated from indium tin oxide (“ITO”). In the OFF state with no electric field applied, the extraordinary axis of the liquid crystals generally aligns normal to the fringes. The grating thus exhibits high refractive index modulation and high diffraction efficiency for P-polarized light. When an electric field is applied to the HPDLC, the grating switches to the ON state wherein the extraordinary axes of the liquid crystal molecules align parallel to the applied field and hence perpendicular to the substrate. In the ON state, the grating exhibits lower refractive index modulation and lower diffraction efficiency for both S- and P-polarized light. Thus, the grating region no longer diffracts light. Each grating region can be divided into a multiplicity of grating elements such as for example a pixel matrix according to the function of the HPDLC device. Typically, the electrode on one substrate surface is uniform and continuous, while electrodes on the opposing substrate surface are patterned in accordance to the multiplicity of selectively switchable grating elements.


One of the known attributes of transmission SBGs is that the LC molecules tend to align with an average direction normal to the grating fringe planes (i.e., parallel to the grating or K-vector). The effect of the LC molecule alignment is that transmission SBGs efficiently diffract P polarized light (i.e., light with a polarization vector in the plane of incidence), but have nearly zero diffraction efficiency for S polarized light (i.e., light with the polarization vector normal to the plane of incidence). As a result, transmission SBGs typically cannot be used at near-grazing incidence as the diffraction efficiency of any grating for P polarization falls to zero when the included angle between the incident and reflected light is small. In addition, illumination light with non-matched polarization is not captured efficiently in holographic displays sensitive to one polarization only.


HPDLC Material Systems


HPDLC mixtures in accordance with various embodiments of the invention generally include LC, monomers, photoinitiator dyes, and coinitiators. The mixture (often referred to as syrup) frequently also includes a surfactant. For the purposes of describing the invention, a surfactant is defined as any chemical agent that lowers the surface tension of the total liquid mixture. The use of surfactants in HPDLC mixtures is known and dates back to the earliest investigations of HPDLCs. For example, a paper by R. L Sutherland et al., SPIE Vol. 2689, 158-169, 1996, the disclosure of which is incorporated herein by reference, describes a PDLC mixture including a monomer, photoinitiator, coinitiator, chain extender, and LCs to which a surfactant can be added. Surfactants are also mentioned in a paper by Natarajan et al, Journal of Nonlinear Optical Physics and Materials, Vol. 5 No. I 89-98, 1996, the disclosure of which is incorporated herein by reference. Furthermore, U.S. Pat. No. 7,018,563 by Sutherland; et al., discusses polymer-dispersed liquid crystal material for forming a polymer-dispersed liquid crystal optical element including: at least one acrylic acid monomer; at least one type of liquid crystal material; a photoinitiator dye; a coinitiator; and a surfactant. The disclosure of U.S. Pat. No. 7,018,563 is hereby incorporated by reference in its entirety.


The patent and scientific literature contains many examples of material systems and processes that can be used to fabricate SBGs, including investigations into formulating such material systems for achieving high diffraction efficiency, fast response time, low drive voltage, and so forth. U.S. Pat. No. 5,942,157 by Sutherland, and U.S. Pat. No. 5,751,452 by Tanaka et al. both describe monomer and liquid crystal material combinations suitable for fabricating SBG devices. Examples of recipes can also be found in papers dating back to the early 1990s. Many of these materials use acrylate monomers, including:

    • R. L. Sutherland et al., Chem. Mater. 5, 1533 (1993), the disclosure of which is incorporated herein by reference, describes the use of acrylate polymers and surfactants. Specifically, the recipe includes a crosslinking multifunctional acrylate monomer; a chain extender N-vinyl pyrrolidinone, LC E7, photo-initiator rose Bengal, and coinitiator N-phenyl glycine. Surfactant octanoic acid was added in certain variants.
    • Fontecchio et al., SID 00 Digest 774-776, 2000, the disclosure of which is incorporated herein by reference, describes a UV curable HPDLC for reflective display applications including a multi-functional acrylate monomer, LC, a photoinitiator, a coinitiators, and a chain terminator.
    • Y. H. Cho, et al., Polymer International, 48, 1085-1090, 1999, the disclosure of which is incorporated herein by reference, discloses HPDLC recipes including acrylates.
    • Karasawa et al., Japanese Journal of Applied Physics, Vol. 36, 6388-6392, 1997, the disclosure of which is incorporated herein by reference, describes acrylates of various functional orders.
    • T. J. Bunning et al., Polymer Science: Part B: Polymer Physics, Vol. 35, 2825-2833, 1997, the disclosure of which is incorporated herein by reference, also describes multifunctional acrylate monomers.
    • G. S. Iannacchione et al., Europhysics Letters Vol. 36 (6). 425-430, 1996, the disclosure of which is incorporated herein by reference, describes a PDLC mixture including a penta-acrylate monomer, LC, chain extender, coinitiators, and photoinitiator.


Acrylates offer the benefits of fast kinetics, good mixing with other materials, and compatibility with film forming processes. Since acrylates are cross-linked, they tend to be mechanically robust and flexible. For example, urethane acrylates of functionality 2 (di) and 3 (tri) have been used extensively for HPDLC technology. Higher functionality materials such as penta and hex functional stems have also been used.


Overview of Birefringence


Holographic waveguides based on HPDLC offer the benefits of switching capability and high index modulation, but can suffer from the inherent birefringence resulting from the alignment of liquid crystal directors along grating vectors during the LC-polymer phase separation. While this can lead to a large degree of polarization selectivity, which can be advantageous in many applications, adverse effects such as polarization rotation can occur in gratings designed to fold and expand the waveguided beam in the plane of the waveguide (known as fold gratings). This polarization rotation can lead to efficiency losses and output light nonuniformity.


Two common approaches for modifying the alignment of LC directors include rubbing and the application of an alignment layer. Typically, by such means, LC directors in a plane parallel to the alignment layer can be realigned within the plane. In HPDLC Bragg gratings, the problem is more challenging owing to the natural alignment of LC directors along grating K-vectors, making director alignment in all but the simplest gratings a complex three-dimensional problem and rendering conventional techniques using rubbing or polyamide alignment layers impractical. Other approaches can include applying electric fields, magnetic fields, and mechanical pressure during curing. These approaches have been shown to have limited success when applied to reflection gratings. However, such techniques typically do not easily translate to transmission Bragg grating waveguides.


A major design challenge in waveguides is the coupling of image content from an external projector into the waveguide efficiently and in such a way that the waveguide image is free from chromatic dispersion and brightness non-uniformity. To overcome chromatic dispersion and to achieve the respectable collimation, the use of lasers can be implemented. However, lasers can suffer from the problem of pupil banding artifacts, which manifest themselves as output illumination non-uniformity. Banding artifacts can form when the collimated pupil is replicated (expanded) in a TIR waveguide. In basic terms, the light beams diffracted out of the waveguide each time the beam interacts with the grating can have gaps or overlaps, leading to an illumination ripple. In many cases, the degree of ripple is a function of field angle, waveguide thickness, and aperture thickness. The effect of banding can be smoothed by the dispersion typically exhibited by broadband sources such as LEDs. However, LED illumination is not entirely free from the banding problem and, moreover, tends to result in bulky input optics and an increase in the thickness of the waveguide. Debanding can be minimized using a pupil shifting technique for configuring the light coupled into the waveguide such that the input grating has an effective input aperture that is a function of the TIR angle. Techniques for performing pupil-shifting in international application No. PCT/US2018/015553 entitled “Waveguide Device with Uniform Output Illumination,” the disclosure of which is hereby incorporated by reference in its entirety.


In some cases, the polarization rotation that takes place in fold gratings (described above) can compensate for illumination banding in waveguides that uses laser illumination. The mechanism for this is that the large number of grating interactions in a fold grating combined with the small polarization rotation at each interaction can average out the banding (arising from imperfect matching of TIR beams and other coherent optical effects such as but not limited to those arising from parasitic gratings left over from the recording process, stray light interactions with the grating and waveguide surfaces, etc.). The process of compensating for the birefringence can be aided by fine tuning the spatial variation of the birefringence (alignment of the LC directors) in the fold grating.


A further issue that arises in waveguide displays is that contact with moisture or surface combination can inhibit waveguide total internal reflection (TIR), leading to image gaps. In such cases, the scope for using protective outer layers can be limited by the need for low index materials that will provide TIR over the waveguide angular bandwidth. A further design challenge in waveguides is maintaining high efficiency over the angular bandwidth of the waveguide. One exemplary solution would be a polarization-maintaining, wide-angle, and high-reflection waveguide cladding. In some applications, polarization balancing within a waveguide can be accomplished using either a quarter wave retarding layer or a half wave retarder layer applied to one or both of the principal reflecting surfaces of the waveguide. However, in some cases, practical retarder films can add unacceptable thickness to the waveguide. Thin film coatings of the required prescription will normally entail an expensive and time-consuming vacuum coating step. One exemplary method of implementing a coating includes but not limited to the use of an inkjet printing or industry-standard spin-coating procedure. In many embodiments, the coating could be applied directly to a printed grating layer. Alternatively, the coating could be applied to an external optical surface of the assembled waveguide.


In some applications, waveguides are combined with conventional optics for correcting aberrations. Such aberrations may arise when waveguides are used in applications such as but not limited to a car HUD, which projects an image onto a car windscreen for reflection into the viewer's eyebox. The curvatures of the windscreen can introduce significant geometric aberration. Since many waveguides operate with collimated beams, it can be difficult to pre-compensate for the distortion within the waveguide itself. One solution includes mounting a pre-compensating optical element near the output surface of the waveguides. In many cases, the optical element is molded in plastic and can introduce severe birefringence, which should be balanced by the waveguide.


In view of the above, many embodiments of the invention are directed towards birefringence control layers designed to address one or more of the issues posed above. For example, in many embodiments, a compact and efficient birefringence control layer is implemented for compensating for polarization related losses in holographic waveguides, for providing three-dimensional LC director alignment in waveguides based on Bragg gratings, for spatially varying angular/spectral bandwidth for homogenizing the output from a waveguide, and/or for isolating a waveguide from its environment while ensuring confinement of wave-guided beams. In some embodiments, a polarization-maintaining, wide-angle, and high-reflection waveguide cladding with polarization compensation is implemented for grating birefringence. In several embodiments, a thin polarization control layer is implemented for providing either quarter wave or half wave retardation. A polarization control layer can be implemented as a thin layer directly on top of the grating layer or to one or both of the waveguide substrates using a standard spin coating or inkjet printing process. In a number of embodiments, a polarization-maintaining, wide-angle birefringence control layer is implemented for modifying the polarization output of a waveguide to balance the birefringence of an external optical element used with the waveguide. Other implementations and specific configurations are discussed below in further detail.


Waveguide Applications Incorporating Birefringence Control


Waveguides and waveguide displays implementing birefringence control techniques in accordance with various embodiments of the invention can be achieved using many different techniques. In some embodiments, the waveguide includes a birefringent grating layer and a birefringence control layer. In further embodiments, a compact and efficient birefringence control layer is implemented. A birefringence control layer can be implemented for various functions such as but not limited to: compensating for polarization related losses in holographic waveguides; providing three-dimensional LC director alignment in waveguides based on Bragg gratings; and efficient and cost-effective integration within a waveguide for spatially varying angular/spectral bandwidth for homogenizing the output from the waveguide. In any of the embodiments to be described, the birefringence control layer may be formed on any optical surface of the waveguide. For the purposes of understanding the invention, an optical surface of the waveguide may be one of the TIR surfaces, a surface of the grating layer, a surface of the waveguide substrates sandwiching the grating layer, or a surface of any other optical substrate implemented within the waveguide (for example, a beam-splitter layer for improving uniformity).



FIG. 1 conceptually illustrates a waveguide implementing a birefringence control layer in accordance with an embodiment of the invention. In the illustrative embodiment, the waveguide apparatus 100 includes an optical substrate 101 containing a birefringent grating layer 102 and a birefringence control layer 103. As shown, light 104 propagating under TIR within the waveguide interacts with both layers. For example, the light ray 104A with an initial polarization state represented by the symbol 104B has its polarization rotated to the state 104C after propagation through the grating region around the point 102A. The birefringence control layer 103 rotates the polarization vector into the state 104D, which is the polarization state for achieving some predefined diffraction efficiency of the ray 104E when it interacts with the grating around the point 102B and is diffracted into the direction 104F with a polarization state 104G, which is similar to the state 104D. As will be shown in the following description, many different configurations of a birefringence control layer and birefringent grating can be implemented in accordance with various embodiments of the invention.



FIG. 2 conceptually illustrates a waveguide apparatus 200 that includes at least one optical substrate 201 and a coupler 202 for deflecting light 203A, 203B (covering a range of incident angles) from an external source 204 into TIR paths 205A, 205B in the waveguide substrate. Light in the TIR path can interact with the output grating, which can be configured to extract a portion of the light each time the TIR light satisfies the condition for diffraction by the grating. In the case of a Bragg grating, extraction can occur when the Bragg condition is met. More precisely, efficient extraction can occur when a ray incident on the grating lies within an angular bandwidth and spectral bandwidth around the Bragg condition. The bandwidths being defined according to some measure of acceptable diffraction efficiency (such as but not limited to 50% of peak DE). For example, light in the TIR ray paths 205A, 205B is diffracted by the output grating into output direction 206A, 206B, 207A, and 207B at different points along the output grating. It should be apparent from basic geometrical optics that a unique TIR angle can be defined by each light incidence angle at the input grating.


Many different types of optical elements can be used as the coupler. For example, in some embodiments, the coupler is a grating. In several embodiments, the coupler is a birefringent grating. In many embodiments, the coupler is a prism. The apparatus further includes at least one birefringent grating 208 for providing beam expansion in a first direction and light extraction from the waveguide and at least one birefringence control layer 209 with anisotropic refractive index properties. In the embodiments to be discussed, the source 204 can be an input image generator that includes a light source, a microdisplay panel, and optics for collimating the light. As can readily be appreciated, various input image generators can be used, including those that output non-collimated light. In many embodiments, the input image generator projects the image displayed on the microdisplay panel such that each display pixel is converted into a unique angular direction within the substrate waveguide. The collimation optics may include lens and mirrors, which can be diffractive lenses and mirrors. In some embodiments, the source may be configured to provide illumination that is not modulated with image information. In several embodiments, the light source can be a laser or LED and can include one or more lenses for modifying the illumination beam angular characteristics. In a number of embodiments, the image source can be a micro-display or an image scanner.


The interaction of the light with the birefringence control layer 209 and the birefringent grating 208 integrated along the total internal reflection path for any direction of the light can provide a predefined characteristic of the light extracted from the waveguide. In some embodiments, the predefined characteristic includes at least one of a uniform polarization or a uniform illumination over the angular range of the light. FIG. 2 also illustrates how the birefringence control layer 209 and grating 208 provide uniform polarization. In many embodiments, the input state will correspond to P polarization, a state which may be used for gratings recorded in HPDLC. For the purposes of explaining the invention, an initial polarization state represented by 210 is assumed. The interaction of the light with the birefringence control layer near a grating interaction region along the TIR path 205A is represented by the polarization states 211, 212, which show the rotation of the polarization vector before and after propagation through the thickness AB of the birefringence control layer 209. This polarization rotation can be designed to balance the polarization rotation through the thickness CD of the adjacent grating region the ray encounters along the TIR path 205A. Thus, the polarization of the light extracted by the grating can be aligned parallel to the input polarization vector as indicated by the polarization state 213. In some embodiments, the output polarization state may differ from the input polarization state. In a number of embodiments, such as the one shown in FIG. 2, there is at least partial overlap of the birefringent grating and the birefringence control layer. In several embodiments, the two are separated by a portion of the waveguide path.



FIG. 3 conceptually illustrates a waveguide apparatus 300 in which the birefringence control layer and grating provide uniform output illumination in accordance with an embodiment of the invention. In the illustrative embodiment, the waveguide apparatus 300 includes at least one optical substrate 301 and a coupler 302 for deflecting light 303 from an external source 304 into TIR path 305 in the waveguide substrate. The apparatus 300 further includes at least one birefringent grating 306 for providing beam expansion in a first direction and light extraction from the waveguide and at least one birefringence control layer 307 with anisotropic index properties. As shown, light in the TIR ray paths 305 can be diffracted by the output grating into output direction 308, 309. For the purposes of explaining the invention, an initial beam illumination (I) versus angle (U) profile represented by 310 is assumed. The interaction of the light with the birefringence control layer 307 near a grating interaction region along the TIR path 305 is characterized by the illumination profiles before (311) and after (312) propagation through the thickness AB of the birefringence control layer. In some applications, such as but not limited to display applications, the waveguide apparatus 300 can be designed to have uniform illumination versus angle across the exit pupil of the waveguide. This may be achieved by matching the birefringence versus angle characteristics of the birefringence control layer to the angular bandwidth of the grating (along nearby grating paths CD in proximity to the path AB) such that the light extracted by the grating (indicated by 308, 309) integrated across the waveguide exit pupil provides uniform illumination versus angle distribution 313. In some embodiments, the characteristics of the grating and birefringence control layer vary over the aperture of the waveguide.


Implementing Birefringence Control Layers


Various materials and fabrication processes can be used to provide a birefringence control layer. In many embodiments, the birefringent control layer has anisotropic index properties that can be controlled during fabrication to provide a spatial distribution of birefringence such that the interaction of the light with the birefringence control layer and the birefringent grating integrated along the total internal reflection path for any direction of the light provides a predefined characteristic of the light extracted from the waveguide. In some embodiments, the layer may be implemented as a thin stack that includes more than one layer.


Alignment of HPDLC gratings can present significant challenges depending on the grating configuration. In the simplest case of a plane grating, polarization control can be confined to a single plane orthogonal to the grating plane. Rolled K-vector gratings can require the alignment to vary across the grating plane. Fold gratings, particularly ones with slanted Bragg fringes, can have much more complicated birefringence, requiring 3D alignment and, in some cases, more highly spatially resolved alignment.


The following examples of birefringence control layers for use with the invention are illustrative only. In each case, it is assumed that the layer is processed such that the properties vary across the surface of the layer. It is also assumed that the birefringence control layer is configured within the waveguide or on an optical surface of the waveguide containing the grating. In some embodiments, the birefringence control layer is in contact with the grating layer. In several cases, the birefringence control layer spits into separate sections and are disposed on different surfaces of the waveguide. In a number of embodiments, a birefringence layer may include multiple layers.


In some embodiments, the invention provides a thin polarization control layer that can provide either quarter wave or half wave retardation. The polarization control layer can be implemented as a thin layer directly on top of the grating layer or to one or both of the waveguide substrates using a standard spin coating or ink jet printing process.


In one group of embodiments, the birefringence control layer is formed using materials using liquid crystal and polymer networks that can be aligned in 3D using directional UV light. In some embodiments, the birefringence control layer is formed at least in part from a Liquid Crystal Polymer (LCP) Network. LCPs, which have also been referred to in the literature as reactive mesogens, are polymerizable liquid crystals containing liquid crystalline monomers that include, for example, reactive acrylate end groups, which polymerize with one another in the presence of photo-initiators and directional UV light to form a rigid network. The mutual polymerization of the ends of the liquid crystal molecules can freeze their orientation into a three-dimensional pattern. The process typically includes coating a material system containing liquid crystal polymer onto a substrate and selectively aligning the LC directors using directionally/spatially controllable UV source prior to annealing. In some embodiments, the birefringence control layer is formed at least in part from a Photo-Alignment Layer, also referred to in the literature as a linearly polymerized photopolymer (LPP). An LPP can be configured to align LC directors parallel or perpendicular to incident linearly polarized UV light. LPP can be formed in very thin layers (typically 50 nm) minimizing the risks of scatter or other spurious optical effect. In some embodiments, the birefringence control layer is formed from LCP, LPP, and at least one dopant. Birefringence control layers based on LCPs and LPPs can be used align LC directors in the complex three-dimensional geometries characteristic of fold gratings and rolled K-vector gratings formed in thin film (2-4 microns). In some embodiments, a birefringence control layer based on LCPs or LPPs further includes dichroic dyes, chiral dopants to achieve narrow or broadband cholesteric filters, twisted retarders, or negative c-plate retarders. In many embodiments, birefringence control layers based on LCPs or LPPs provide quarter or half-wave retardation layers.


In some embodiments, the birefringence control layer is formed by a multilayer structure combining isotropic and anisotropic index layers (as shown in FIG. 4). In FIG. 4, the multilayer structure 400 includes isotropic layers 401, 402 and anisotropic index layers 403, 404. In some embodiments, a multiplayer stack may include a high number of layers, such as but not limited to several tens or several hundreds of layers. FIG. 5 conceptually illustrates a multilayer structure 500 that includes isotropic layers 501, 502 and anisotropic index layers 503, 504 combined with a birefringent grating layer 505. When birefringence is on the order of the change of the in-plane refractive index between adjacent material layers of the stack, it is possible to achieved improved control of the reflectivity of P-polarized light. Normally in isotropic materials Brewster's law dictates that for any interface, there is an angle of incidence (Brewster's angle) for which the P-polarization reflectivity vanishes. However, the reflectivity can increase dramatically at other angles. The limitations imposed by the Brewster angle can be overcome by applying the basic principles discussed in Weber et al., “Giant Birefringent Optics in Multilayer Polymer Mirrors,” published in Science, Vol. 287, 31 Mar. 2000, pages 2451-2456. Because the optical characteristic of systems of isotropic/anisotropic index layers are based on the fundamental physics of interfacial reflection and phase thickness and not on a particular multilayer interference stack design, new design freedoms are possible. Designs for wide-angle, broadband applications are simplified if the Brewster angle restriction is eliminated, particularly for birefringence control layers immersed in a high-index medium such as a waveguide substrate. A further advantage in relation to waveguide displays is that color fidelity can be maintained for all incidence angles and polarizations.


A birefringent grating will typically have polarization rotation properties that are functions of angle wavelength. The birefringence control layer can be used to modify the angular, spectral, or polarization characteristics of the waveguide. In some embodiments, the interaction of light with the birefringence control layer can provide an effective angular bandwidth variation along the waveguide. In many embodiments, the interaction of light with the birefringence control layer can provide an effective spectral bandwidth variation along the waveguide. In several embodiments, the interaction of light with the birefringence control layer can provide a polarization rotation along the waveguide. In a number of embodiments, the grating birefringence can be made to vary across the waveguide by spatially varying the composition of the liquid crystal polymer mixture during grating fabrication. In some embodiments, the birefringence control layer can provide a birefringence variation in at least one direction in the plane of the waveguide substrate. The birefringence control layer can also provide a means for optimizing optical transmission (for different polarizations) within the waveguide. In many embodiments, the birefringence control layer can provide a transmission variation in at least one direction in the plane of the waveguide substrate. In several embodiments, the birefringence control layer can provide an angular dependence of at least one of beam transmission or polarization rotation in at least one direction in the plane of the waveguide substrate. In a number of embodiments, the birefringence control layer can provide a spectral dependence of at least one of beam transmission or polarization rotation in at least one direction in the plane of the waveguide substrate.


In many embodiments, birefringent gratings may provide input couplers, fold gratings, and output gratings in a wide range of waveguide architectures. FIG. 6 conceptually illustrates a plan view of a dual expansion waveguide with birefringent control layers in accordance with an embodiment of the invention. In the illustrative embodiment, the waveguide 600 includes an optical substrate 601 that contains an input grating 602, a fold grating 603, and an output grating 604 that are overlaid by polarization control layers 605, 606, 607, respectively.


In some embodiments, the invention provides a polarization-maintaining, wide angle birefringence control layer for modifying the polarization output of a waveguide to balance the birefringence of an external optical element used with the waveguide. FIG. 7 conceptually illustrates an embodiment of the invention directed at automobile HUDs, which reflect collimated imagery off the windscreen into an eyebox. Any windscreen curvature will typically result in aberrations and other geometrical distortion, which cannot be corrected in certain waveguide implementations with the requirement for the beam to remain substantially collimated. One solution to this problem is to mount a correction element, which may be a conventional refractive element or a diffractive element, near the output surface of the waveguide. In such implementations, the birefringence correction component can avoid disturbing ray paths from the waveguide and can be achromatic. The compensator technology used can provide spatially-varying configuration, low haze, and high transmission. In the illustrative embodiment of FIG. 7, the waveguide 700 includes an optical substrate 701 containing a grating coupler 702 for deflecting light 703 from an external source of image modulated light (not shown) into the TIR path 704 in the waveguide, a birefringent grating 705 for providing beam expansion in a first direction and extracting light from the waveguide, and a birefringence control layer 706. The apparatus 700 further includes an optical element 707 disposed in proximity to the waveguide for correcting geometrical distortions and other aberrations introduced by reflection at the windscreen. In some embodiments, the optical element 707 is a refractive lens. In other embodiments, the optical element 707 can be a diffractive lens. For wide field of view HUDs providing a generous eye box, the corrector will typically have a large footprint with a horizontal dimension (along the dashboard) as large as 400 mm. However, if the corrector is molded in plastic, it will tend to suffer from birefringence. Hence, in the embodiment of FIG. 7, the birefringence control element 706 can be designed to compensate for both the grating polarization and polarization rotation introduced by the optical element 707. Referring again to FIG. 7, an initial polarization state corresponding to P polarization is assumed. The polarization state after propagation through the birefringence grating, birefringence control layer, and the correction elements is represented by the symbols 708-711. The interaction of the light with the birefringence control layer near to a grating interaction region along the TIR path is represented by the polarization states. In the embodiment of FIG. 7, the polarization of the light 712, 713 extracted by the grating is aligned parallel to the input polarization vector. In some embodiments, the birefringence control layer 706 may be configured to rotate the output light polarization vector through ninety degrees.


In some embodiments, the birefringence control layer can be provided by various techniques using mechanical, thermal, or electro-magnetic processing of substrates. For example, in some embodiments, the birefringence control layer is formed by applying spatially varying mechanical stress across the surface of an optical substrate. FIG. 8 conceptually illustrates an apparatus 800 for aligning a birefringence control layer 801 in which forces are applied in the directions indicated by 802-805, resulting in the iso-birefringence contours 806. In many embodiments, the forces illustrated do not necessarily all need to be applied to the layer. In some embodiments, the birefringence control layer 801 is formed by inducing thermal gradients into an optical substrate. In a number of embodiments, the birefringence control layer 801 is provided by a HPDLC grating in which LC directors are aligned using electric or magnetic fields during curing. In several embodiments, two or more of the above techniques may be combined.


Fabrication of Waveguides Implementing Birefringence Control Layers


The present invention also provides methods and apparatus for fabricating a waveguide containing a birefringent grating and a birefringence control layer. The construction and arrangement of the apparatus and methods as shown in the various exemplary embodiments are illustrative only. Although only a few embodiments have been described in detail in this disclosure, many modifications are possible (for example, additional steps for improving the efficiency of the process and quality of the finished waveguide, minimizing process variances, monitoring the process and others.) Any process step referring to the formation of a layer should be understood to cover multiple such layers. For example, where a process step of recording a grating layer is described, this step can extend to recording a stack containing two or more grating layers. Accordingly, all such modifications are intended to be included within the scope of the present disclosure. The order or sequence of any process or method steps may be varied or re-sequenced according to alternative embodiments. Other substitutions, modifications, changes, and omissions may be made in the design of the process apparatus, operating conditions and arrangement of the exemplary embodiments without departing from the scope of the present disclosure. For the purposes of explaining the invention, the description of the processes will refer to birefringence control layers based on liquid crystal polymer material systems as described above. However, it should be clear from the description that the processes may be based on any of the implementations of a birefringence control layer described herein.



FIGS. 9A-9F conceptually illustrate the process steps and apparatus for fabricating a waveguide containing a birefringent grating and a birefringence control layer in accordance with various embodiments of the invention. FIG. 9A shows the first step 900 of providing a first transparent substrate 901. FIG. 9B illustrates an apparatus 910 for applying holographic recording material to the substrate 901. In the illustrative embodiment, the apparatus 910 includes a coating apparatus 911 that provides a spray pattern 912 that forms a layer 913 of grating recording material onto the substrate 901. In some embodiments, the spray pattern may include a narrow jet or blade swept or stepped across the surface to be coated. In several embodiments, the spray pattern may include a divergent jet for covering large areas of a surface simultaneously. In a number of embodiments, the coating apparatus may be used in conjunction with one or more masks for providing selective coating of regions of the surface. In many embodiments, the coating apparatus is based on industry-standard standard spin-coating or ink-jet printing processes.



FIG. 9C conceptually illustrates an apparatus 920 for exposing a layer of grating recording material to form a grating layer in accordance with an embodiment of the invention. In the illustrative embodiment, the apparatus 920 contains a master grating 921 for contact copying the grating in the recording material and a laser 922. As shown, the master 921 diffracts incident light 923 to provide zero order 924 and diffracted light 925, which interferes within the grating material layer to form a grating layer 926. The apparatus may have further features, such as but not limited to light stops and masks for overcoming stray light from higher diffraction orders or other sources. In some embodiments, several gratings may be recorded into a single layer using the principles of multiplexed holograms. FIG. 9D conceptually illustrates an apparatus 930 for coating a layer of liquid crystal polymer material onto the grating layer in accordance with an embodiment of the invention. In the illustrative embodiment, the apparatus 930 contains a coating apparatus 931 configured to deliver a spray pattern 932 forming a layer of material 933. The coating apparatus 931 may have similar features to the coating apparatus used to apply the grating recording material. FIG. 9E conceptually illustrates an apparatus 940 for providing an aligned liquid crystal polymer layer of material in accordance with an embodiment of the invention. In the illustrative embodiment, the apparatus 940 contains a UV source (which can include collimation, beams steering, and beam shaping optics, depending on the specific requirements of a given application) 941 providing directional UV light 942 for forming an aligned LC polymer layer 943. FIG. 9F conceptually illustrates the completed waveguide 950 after the step of applying a second substrate 951 over the aligned liquid crystal polymer layer 943.


In some embodiments, exposure of the grating recording material may use conventional cross beam recording procedures instead of the mastering process described above. In many embodiments, further processing of the grating layer may include annealing, thermal processing, and/or other processes for stabilizing the optical properties of grating layer. In some embodiments, electrodes coatings may be applied to the substrates. In many embodiments, a protective transparent layer may be applied over the grating layer after exposure. In a number of embodiments, the liquid crystal polymer material is based on the LCP, LPP material systems discussed above. In several embodiments, the alignment of the liquid crystal polymer can result in an alignment of the liquid crystal directors parallel to the UV beam direction. In other embodiments, the alignment is at ninety degrees to the UV beam direction. In some embodiments, the second transparent substrate may be replaced by a protective layer applied using a coating apparatus.



FIGS. 10A-10F conceptually illustrate the process steps and apparatus for fabricating a waveguide containing a birefringent grating with a birefringence control layer applied to an outer surface of the waveguide in accordance with various embodiments of the invention. FIG. 10A conceptually illustrates the first step 1000 of providing a first transparent substrate 1001 in accordance with an embodiment of the invention. FIG. 10B conceptually illustrates an apparatus 1010 for applying holographic recording material to the substrate in accordance with an embodiment of the invention. In the illustrative embodiment, the apparatus 1010 includes a coating apparatus 1011 providing a spray pattern 1012 that forms the layer 1013 of grating recording material onto the substrate 1001. FIG. 10C conceptually illustrates an apparatus 1020 for exposing a layer of grating recording material to form a grating layer in accordance with an embodiment of the invention. In the illustrative embodiment, the apparatus 1020 includes a master grating 1021 for contact copying the grating in the recording material and a laser 1022. As shown, the master 1021 converts light 1023 from the laser 1022 into zero order 1024 and diffracted light 1025, which interfere within the grating material layer 1013 to form a grating layer 1026. FIG. 10D conceptually illustrates the partially completed waveguide 1030 after the step of applying a second substrate 1031 over the exposed grating layer in accordance with an embodiment of the invention. FIG. 10E conceptually illustrates an apparatus 1040 for coating a layer of liquid crystal polymer material onto the second substrate in accordance with an embodiment of the invention. In the illustrative embodiment, the apparatus 1040 includes a spray coater 1041 for delivering a spray pattern 1042 to form a layer of material 1043. FIG. 10F conceptually illustrates an apparatus 1050 for aligning the liquid crystal polymer material in accordance with an embodiment of the invention. In the illustrative embodiment, the apparatus 1050 includes a UV source 1051 providing the directional UV light 1052 for forming an aligned liquid crystal polymer layer 1053, which can be configured to realign the LC directors of the grating layer 1026.



FIGS. 11A-11F conceptually illustrate the process steps and apparatus for fabricating a waveguide containing a birefringent grating and a birefringence control layer in accordance with various embodiments of the invention. Unlike the above described embodiments, the step of forming the birefringence control layer can be carried out before the recording of the grating layer, which is formed above the birefringence control layer. FIG. 11A conceptually illustrates the first step 1100 of providing a first transparent substrate 1101. FIG. 11B conceptually illustrates an apparatus 1110 for coating a layer of liquid crystal polymer material onto the first substrate in accordance with an embodiment of the invention. In the illustrative embodiment, the apparatus 1110 includes a coating apparatus 1111 configured to deliver a spray pattern 1112 to form a layer of material 1113. FIG. 11C conceptually illustrates an apparatus 1120 for aligning the liquid crystal polymer material in accordance with an embodiment of the invention. In the illustrative embodiment, the apparatus 1120 includes a UV source 1121 providing the directional UV light 1122 for forming an aligned liquid crystal polymer layer 1123. FIG. 11D conceptually illustrates an apparatus 1130 for applying holographic recording material to the substrate in accordance with an embodiment of the invention. In the illustrative embodiment, the apparatus 1130 includes a coating apparatus 1131 for providing a spray pattern 1132 to form a layer of grating recording material 1133 on top of the liquid crystal polymer layer 1123. FIG. 11E conceptually illustrates an apparatus 1140 for exposing a layer of grating recording material to form a grating layer in accordance with an embodiment of the invention. In the illustrative embodiment, the apparatus 1140 includes a master grating 1141 for contact copying the grating in the recording material and a laser 1142. As shown, the master 1141 converts light 1142 from the laser into zero order 1143 and diffracted light 1144, which interfere in the grating material layer 1133 to form a grating layer 1145, which is aligned by the liquid crystal polymer material layer 1123. FIG. 11F conceptually illustrates the completed waveguide 1150 after the step of applying a second substrate 1151 over the exposed grating layer in accordance with an embodiment of the invention.



FIG. 12 conceptually illustrates a flow chart illustrating a method of fabricating a waveguide containing a birefringent grating and a birefringence control layer in accordance with an embodiment of the invention. Referring to FIG. 12, the method 1200 includes providing (1201) a first transparent substrate. A layer of grating recording material can be deposited (1202) onto the substrate. The layer of grating recording material can be exposed (1203) to form a grating layer. A layer of liquid crystal polymer material can be deposited (1204) onto the grating layer. The liquid crystal polymer material can be aligned (1205) using directional UV light. A second transparent substrate can be applied (1206) over the alignment layer.



FIG. 13 conceptually illustrates a flow chart illustrating a method of fabricating a waveguide containing a birefringent grating and a birefringence control layer applied to an outer surface of the waveguide in accordance with an embodiment of the invention. Referring to FIG. 13, the method 1300 includes providing (1301) a first transparent substrate. A layer of grating recording material can be deposited (1302) onto the substrate. The layer of grating recording material can be exposed (1303) to form a grating layer. A second transparent substrate can be applied (1304) over the exposed grating layer. A layer of liquid crystal polymer material can be deposited (1305) onto the second transparent substrate. The liquid crystal polymer material can be aligned (1306) using directional UV light.



FIG. 14 conceptually illustrates a flow chart illustrating a method of fabricating a waveguide containing a birefringent grating and a birefringence control layer where forming the birefringence control layer is carried out before the recording of the grating layer in accordance with an embodiment of the invention. Referring to FIG. 14, the method 1400 includes providing (1401) a first transparent substrate. A layer of liquid crystal polymer material can be deposited (1402) onto the substrate. The liquid crystal polymer material can be aligned (1403) using directional UV light. A layer of grating recording material can be deposited (1404) onto the aligned liquid crystal polymer material. The layer of grating recording material can be exposed (1405) to form a grating layer. A second transparent substrate can be applied (1406) over the grating layer.


Although FIGS. 12-14 illustrate specific processes for fabricating waveguides containing a birefringent grating and a birefringence control layer, many other fabrication processes and apparatus can be implemented to form such waveguides in accordance with various embodiments of the invention. For example, the order or sequence of any process or method steps may be varied or re-sequenced according to alternative embodiments. Other substitutions, modifications, changes, and omissions may be made in the design of the process apparatus, operating conditions and arrangement of the exemplary embodiments without departing from the scope of the present disclosure.


Additional Embodiments and Applications


In some embodiments, a polarization-maintaining, wide angle, high reflection waveguide cladding with polarization compensation for grating birefringence can be implemented. FIG. 15 shows one such embodiment. In the illustrative embodiment, the waveguide 1500 includes a waveguiding substrate 1501 containing a birefringent grating 1502 and a birefringence control layer 1503 overlaying the waveguiding substrate 1501. As shown, guided light 1504 interacting with the birefringence control layer 1503 at its interface with the waveguiding substrate 1501 has its polarization rotated from the state indicated by symbol 1505 (resulting from the previous interaction with the grating) to the state indicated by 1506 (which has a desired orientation for the next interaction with the grating, for example, having an orientation for providing a predefined diffraction efficiency at some pre-defined point along the grating).


In many embodiments, a compact and efficient birefringence control layer for isolating a waveguide from its environment while ensuring efficient confinement of wave-guided beams can be implemented. FIG. 16 illustrates one such embodiment. In the illustrative embodiment, the environmentally isolated waveguide 1600 includes a waveguiding substrate 1601 containing a birefringent grating 1602 and a birefringence control layer 1603 overlaying the waveguiding substrate 1601. As shown, guided light 1604 interacting with the birefringence control layer 1603 at its interface with the waveguiding substrate 1601 has its polarization rotated from the state indicated by the symbol 1605 to the state indicated by 1606. Environmental isolation of the waveguide can be provided by designing the birefringence control layer 1603 such that total internal reflection occurs at the interface 1607 between the birefringence control layer 1603 and the waveguiding substrate 1601. In some embodiments, environmental isolation is provided by designing the birefringence control layer to have gradient index characteristics such that only a small portion of the guided light is reflected at the air interface of the birefringence control layer. In several embodiments, the birefringence control layer may incorporate a separate GRIN layer. In a number of embodiments, a GRIN layer may be based on embodiments disclosed in U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 62/123,282 entitled NEAR EYE DISPLAY USING GRADIENT INDEX OPTICS and U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 62/124,550 entitled WAVEGUIDE DISPLAY USING GRADIENT INDEX OPTICS.



FIG. 17 conceptually illustrates an apparatus 1700, which may be used in conjunction with some of the methods described above, for fabricating a structure containing a birefringent grating layer 1701 overlaying a birefringence control layer 1702 in accordance with an embodiment of the invention. In FIG. 17, the substrate supporting the birefringence control layer is not shown. The construction beams, indicated by rays 1703, 1704, may be provided by a master grating or a crossed beam holographic recording setup. As shown, the construction beams propagate through the birefringence control layer 1702. In many embodiments, the construction beams are in the visible band. In some embodiments, the construction beams are in the UV band.



FIG. 18 conceptually illustrates an apparatus 1800, which may be used in conjunction with some of the methods described above, for fabricating a structure containing a birefringence control layer 1801 overlaying a birefringent grating layer 1802 in accordance with an embodiment of the invention. In FIG. 18, the substrate supporting the grating layer is not shown. The direction of a recording beam is indicated by 1803. In many embodiments the birefringence control layer is a liquid crystal polymer material system which uses a directional UV beam for alignment. In some embodiments, in which the grating is a recorded in a polymer and liquid crystal material system, an exposed grating may be erased during the process of aligning the birefringence control layer by applying an external stimulus such as heat, electric or magnetic fields or light to effective to create an isotropic phase of the liquid crystal.



FIG. 19 conceptually illustrates a cross section of waveguide 1900 containing substrates 1901, 1902 sandwiching a grating layer 1903. As shown, a source 1904 emits collimated light 1905A, which is coupled by the grating layer into the total internal reflection (TIR) path indicated by rays 1905B, 1905C and extracted by the grating layer 1903 into the output ray path 1905D. In the illustrative embodiments, the source 1904 can be a variety of light sources, including but not limited to a laser or a LED.



FIG. 20 conceptually illustrates a waveguide similar to the one of FIG. 19 with a quarter wave polarization layer inserted by replacing the substrate 1902 by a quarter wave film 2001 sandwiched by substrates 2002, 2003 in accordance with an embodiment of the invention. A quarter wave polarization layer can be beneficial to the holographic waveguide design in two ways. Firstly, it can reduce reinteraction (outcoupling) of a rolled K-vector (RKV) input grating to increase the overall coupling efficiency of the input grating. Secondly, it can continuously mix up the polarization of the light going into the fold and output gratings to provide better extraction. The quarter wave layer can be located on a waveguide surface along the optical from the input grating. Typically, a waveguide surface can include one of the TIR surface of the wave or some intermediate surface formed inside the waveguide. The optical characteristics of the quarter wave layer can be optimized for “waveguide angles”—i.e., angles in glass beyond the TIR angle. In some embodiments, the center field is designed at approximately 55 deg. in glass (corresponding to a refractive index of approximately 1.51 at wavelength 532 nm). In many embodiments, optimization for red, green, and blue can be used for optimum performance of red, green, and blue transmitting waveguides. As will be shown in the embodiments to be described, there are several different ways of incorporating the quarter wave film within a waveguide. In the following embodiment, we refer generally to a quarter wave polarization layer provided by a liquid crystal polymer (LCP) material. However, it should be understood that other materials be used in applications of the invention.



FIG. 21 conceptually illustrates a schematic cross section view 2100 showing a portion of a waveguide illustrating how the use of a quarter wave polarization layer with a RKV grating can overcome the problem of unwanted extraction of light along the propagation path in the input grating portion of the waveguide in accordance with an embodiment of the invention. One ray path is illustrated in which input light including the P-polarized light 2101A is coupled by the grating layer into a TIR path indicated by the rays 2101B-2101L in the waveguide. The waveguide grating has rolled K-vectors of which examples occurring at three points along the length of the waveguide are illustrated schematically by the vectors 2102A-2102C. In the illustrative embodiment, the light 2101A diffractively coupled into TIR by the input grating is P-polarized with respect to the grating. In many embodiments, the TIR angle can be nominally 55 degrees in glass. On transmission through the quarter wave layer, the polarization of the light changes from P to circularly polarized (2101C). After TIR at the lower surface of the waveguide the polarization changes to circularly polarized light (2101D) of an opposing sense such that after traversing the quarter wave layer on its upward path becomes S-polarized (2101E) with respect to the grating. The S-polarized light passes through the gating without deviation (2101F) or substantial loss since it is both off-Bragg and “off polarization” (since the grating has zero or low diffraction efficiency for S). This light then undergoes TIR (2101G) a second time retaining its S-polarization. Hence the light 2101G is now on-Bragg but is still off polarization with respect to the P-polarization sensitive grating. The light therefore passes through the grating without diffraction (2101H). At this location the RKV (2102B) has rolled slightly from the one (2102A) near the light entry point on the UP grating. If the light was “on polarization,” the ‘roll’ effect of RKV would be small, and so the light would be strongly out-coupled. The S-polarization light passing through the grating goes through another full cycle, (2101H-2101M) in a similar fashion to the cycle illustrated by rays 2101B-2101G, and then returns to a P-polarized state for the next (2101M) on-Bragg interaction at the grating region with K-vector 2102C. At this point, the light has performed two complete TIR bounce cycles down the waveguide, increasing the angular separation of the incidence angle at the grating and K-vector, which strongly reduces the on-Bragg interaction.


To clarify the embodiment of FIG. 21 further, a 55-degree TIR angle light in a 1 mm thick waveguide is considered, with a 20 mm projector relief (distance of the projector from the input grating), and a nominal 4.3 mm diameter projector exit pupil: The first interaction with the grating takes place approximately 2.85 mm down the waveguide. This equates to an 8.1-degree angle at 20 mm projector relief. For comparison the FWHM angular bandwidth of a typical 1.6 um grating is about 12 degrees in air (prescription dependent) i.e. the angle subtended by the pupil is not much larger than the semi-width of the lens. This leads to strong outcoupling if polarization is not changed to S-polarized as described above. In effect, the use of the quarter wave layer doubles the TIR length to approximately 5.7 mm. This offset equates to about 15.9 deg, which is larger than the angular bandwidth of most waveguide gratings, thereby reducing outcoupling reinteraction losses from the waveguide.



FIG. 22 conceptually illustrates a polarization layer architecture 2200 containing an LCP quarter wave cell and a reactive monomer liquid crystal mixture (RMLCM) cell separated by index matching oil layer (2201) in accordance with an embodiment of the invention. The LCP cell includes a substrate 2202 and the LCP film 2203. The RMLCM cell includes substrates 2204, 2205 sandwiching the RMLCM layer 2206. This configuration has the advantage that the index matching oil bond can provide a non-permanent bond, which allows for installation and removal of polarization cell for testing purposes. Adhesive can also be applied at the edges (tacked) for a semi-permanent bond. In some embodiments the oil layer can be provided using a cell filled with oil.



FIG. 23 conceptually illustrates an example of a polarization architecture 2300 based on a grating cell with the RMLCM grating material layer 2301 in direct contact with a bare LCP film 2302 in accordance with an embodiment of the invention. The two films are sandwiched by the substrates 2303, 2304. This is a simple and cost-effective solution for implementing an LCP layer. Maintaining thickness control of the RMLCM layer using spacer beads can be difficult if the beads are embedded directly onto LCP layer. The embodiment of FIG. 23 can required careful matching of the material properties of the RMLCM and LCP to avoid detrimental interactions between the RMLCM and the LCP layers. In many embodiments, holographic exposure of the RMLCM layer can be applied directly into the RMLCM and does not need to be through the LCP layer. If exposure construction through the LCP layer is unavoidable, pre-compensation of polarization rotation of the LCP layer can be made in some embodiments.



FIG. 24 conceptually illustrates a cross section view schematically showing an example of polarization layer architecture 2400 in which a bare LCP layer is bonded to a bare RMLCM layer in accordance with an embodiment of the invention. The apparatus includes an upper substrate 2401, a bare LCP film 2402, adhesive layer 2403, an exposed RMLCM layer 2404, and a lower substrate 2405. In many embodiments, the adhesive layer can be Norland NOA65 adhesive or a similar adhesive.



FIG. 25 conceptually illustrates a cross section view schematically showing an example of a polarization layer architecture 2500 using a RMLCM layer as a polarization layer in accordance with an embodiment of the invention. The apparatus includes an upper substrate 2501, an upper RMLCM layer 2502, a transparent spacer 2503, a lower RMLCM layer 2504, and a lower substrate 2505. One of the RMLCM layers can be used not only as the grating material, but also as a polarization rotation layer, using the inherent birefringent properties of RMLCM materials. The ‘polarization rotation grating’ should have a period and/or k-vector direction such that its diffraction is minimal. In some embodiments the RMLCM layer can be configure as a subwavelength grating. In some embodiments, the RMCM layer can be provided sandwiched between two release layers such that after curing the layer can be removed and re-applied elsewhere.



FIG. 26 conceptually illustrates an example of a polarization layer architecture 2600 that includes a feature for compensating for polarization rotation introduced by birefringent gratings in accordance with an embodiment of the invention. The apparatus includes an upper substrate 2601, a polarization control layer 2602, a transparent substrate 2603, a grating layer 2604, and a lower substrate 2605. The grating layer contains a first grating 2606A and a second grating 2606B separated by a clear region 2607. In some embodiments, the clear region can a polymer with refractive index similar to that of the substrates. In many embodiments other low refractive index materials may be used to provide the clear region. The polarization control layer includes quarter wave retarding regions 2608A, 2608B and a polarization compensation region, which balances the polarization rotation introduced by the birefringent grating 2606A (in the case where the guide light propagates from grating 2606A to grating 2606B).



FIG. 27 conceptually illustrates a plan view schematically showing a waveguide display 2700 incorporating the features of the embodiment of FIG. 26 in accordance with an embodiment of the invention. The waveguide display 2700 includes a waveguide substrate 2701, an input grating 2702, a fold grating 2703, and an output grating 2704. Polarization control regions 2705, 2706 apply compensation for grating depolarization according to the principle of the embodiment of FIG. 26.



FIG. 28 conceptually illustrates a cross section view schematically showing an example of a polarization layer architecture 2800 containing an upper substrate 2801, an LCP layer 2802 with hard encapsulation layer 2803, a RMLCM layer 2804, and a lower substrate 2805 in accordance with an embodiment of the invention. In many embodiments, the hard encapsulation layer or film can be designed to protect the delicate LCP film from mechanical contact, such that standard cleaning procedures will not destroy the film. Advantageously, the hard encapsulation layer can employ a material resistant to spacer beads being pushed into it through the lamination process, as well as being chemically resistant to index matching oil and adhesives.



FIG. 29 conceptually illustrates a cross section view schematically showing an example of a polarization layer architecture 2900 containing an upper substrate 2901, an LCP layer 2902 with soft encapsulation layer 2903, a RMLCM layer 2904, and a lower substrate 2905 in accordance with an embodiment of the invention. The polarization alignment film can be encapsulated with a soft encapsulation layer or film designed to protect the delicate LCP film from mechanical contact, such that standard cleaning procedures such as drag wiping with iso-propyl alcohol, for example, will not destroy the film. In some embodiments, the soft encapsulation can provide some resistance to spacer beads during the lamination process.



FIG. 30 conceptually illustrates a plan view schematically showing a first example 3000 of a two-region polymer film in accordance with an embodiment of the invention. This example using a non-encapsulated LCP film 3001 supported by a 0.5 mm thickness Eagle XG substrate of dimensions 77.2 mm×47.2 mm. Region 1 is characterized by a fast axis 75° from horizontal and by quarter-wave retardance at 55° in-glass angle, 45° ellipticity ±5°, for wavelength 524 nm. Region 2 is characterized by a fast axis 105° from horizontal and a quarter-wave retardance at 55° in-glass angle, 45° ellipticity ±5°, for wavelength 524 nm. Typically, region 1 and region 2 extend to the halfway point horizontally, ±2 mm.



FIG. 31 conceptually illustrates a plan view schematically showing a second example 3100 of a two-region polymer film in accordance with an embodiment of the invention. This example uses encapsulation of the LCP layer 3101 by a protective film 3102, said layers supported by a 0.5 mm thickness Eagle XG substrate of dimensions 77.2 mm×47.2 mm. Region 1 is characterized by a fast axis 75° from horizontal and by quarter-wave retardance at 55° in-glass angle, 45° ellipticity ±5°, for wavelength 524 nm. Region 2 is characterized by a fast axis 105° from horizontal and by quarter-wave retardance at 55° in-glass angle, 45° ellipticity ±5°, for wavelength 524 nm. Typically, Region 1 and region 2 extend to the halfway point horizontally, ±2 mm. The encapsulation layer can seal the polarization layer such that performance is unaffected when covered by layer of oil such as Cargille Series A with refractive index 1.516. The encapsulation layer can seal the polarization layer such that performance is unaffected when covered by an additional layer of liquid crystal-based photopolymer.



FIG. 32 conceptually illustrates a plan view schematically showing a third example 3200 of a two-region polymer film in accordance with an embodiment of the invention. This example uses glass encapsulation of the LCP. A 0.5 mm thickness Eagle XG substrate of dimensions 77.2 mm×47.2 mm supports a LCP layer 3201, an adhesive layer 3202, and 0.2 mm thickness Willow glass cover 3203. Region 1 is characterized by a fast axis 75° from horizontal and by quarter-wave retardance at 55° in-glass angle, 45° ellipticity ±5°, for wavelength 524 nm. Region 2 is characterized by a fast axis 105° from horizontal and by a quarter-wave retardance at 55° in-glass angle, 45° ellipticity ±5°, for wavelength 524 nm. Advantageously, the glass for encapsulations of the LCP is 0.5 mm EagleXG or 0.2 mm Willow glass. Typically, Region 1 and region 2 extend to the halfway point horizontally, ±2 mm.



FIG. 33 conceptually illustrates a drawing showing the clear aperture layout 3300 for the embodiments illustrated in FIGS. 30-32 in accordance with an embodiment of the invention. The clear aperture is highlighted in the dashed line. All dimensions are in mm.



FIG. 34 conceptually illustrates a plan view 3400 schematically showing the waveguide 3401 containing input 3402, fold 3403, and output 3404 gratings based on the embodiments of FIGS.30-33, including the K-vectors and alignment layer fast axis directions for each grating in accordance with an embodiment of the invention. As shown in FIG. 34, the K-vector and fast axis directions are for the input grating K-vector: 30 degrees; for the fold grating K-vector: 270 degrees; and for the output grating K-vector: 150 degrees.


The above description covers only some of the possible embodiments in which an LCP layer (or equivalent retarding layer) can be combined with an RMLCM layer in a waveguide structure. In many of the above described embodiments, the substrates can be fabricated from 0.5 mm thickness Corning Eagle XG glass. In some embodiments, thinner or thicker substrates can be used. In several embodiments, the substrates can be fabricated from plastic. In a number of embodiments, the substrates and optical layers encapsulated by the said substrates can be curved. Any of the embodiments can incorporated additional layers for protection from chemical contamination or damage incurred during processing and handling. In some embodiments, additional substrate layers may be provided to achieve a required waveguide thickness. In some embodiments, additional layers may be provided to perform at least one of the functions of illumination homogenization spectral filtering, angle selective filtering, stray light control, and debanding. In many embodiments, the bare LCP layer can be bonded directly to a bare exposed RMLCM layer. In several embodiments, an intermediate substrate can be disposed between the LCP layer and the RMLCM layer. In a number of embodiments, the LCP layer can be combined with an unexposed layer of RMLCM material. In many embodiments, layers of LCP, with or without encapsulation, can have haze characteristics <0.25%, and preferably 0.1% or less. It should be noted that the quoted haze characteristics are based on bulk material scatter and are independent of surface scatter losses, which are largely lost upon immersion. The LCP and encapsulation layers can survive 100 C exposure (>80 C for thermal UM exposures). In many embodiments, the LCP encapsulation layer can be drag wipe resistant to permit layer cleaning. In the embodiments described above, there can be constant retardance and no bubbles or voids within the film clear aperture. The LCP and adhesive layers can match the optical flatness criteria met by the waveguide substrates.


A color waveguide according to the principles of the invention would typically include a stack of monochrome waveguides. The design may use red, green, and blue waveguide layers or, alternatively, red and blue/green layers. In some embodiments, the gratings are all passive, that is non-switching. In some embodiments, at least one of the gratings is switching. In some embodiments, the input gratings in each layer are switchable to avoid color crosstalk between the waveguide layers. In some embodiments color crosstalk is avoided by disposing dichroic filters between the input grating regions of the red and blue and the blue and green waveguides. In some embodiments, the thickness of the birefringence control layer is optimized for the wavelengths of light propagating within the waveguide to provide the uniform birefringence compensation across the spectral bandwidth of the waveguide display. Wavelengths and spectral bandwidths bands for red, green, blue wavelengths typically used in waveguide displays are red: 626 nm±9 nm, green: 522 nm±18 nm and blue: 452 nm±11 nm. In some embodiments, the thickness of the birefringence control layer is optimized for trichromatic light.


In many embodiments, the birefringence control layer is provided by a subwavelength grating recorded in HPDLC. Such gratings are known to exhibit the phenomenon of form birefringence and can be configured to provide a range of polarization functions including quarter wave and half wave retardation. In some embodiments, the birefringence control layer is provided by a liquid crystal medium in which the LC directors are aligned by illuminating an azo-dye doped alignment layer with polarized or unpolarized light. In a number of embodiments, a birefringence control layer is patterned to provide LC director orientation patterns with submicron resolution steps. In same embodiments, the birefringence control layer is processed to provide continuous variation of the LC director orientations. In several embodiments, a birefringence control layer provided by combining one or more of the techniques described above is combined with a rubbing process or a polyimide alignment layer. In some embodiments, the birefringence control layer provides optical power. In a number of embodiments, the birefringence control layer provides a gradient index structure. In several embodiments, the birefringence control layer is provided by a stack containing at least one HPDLC grating and at least one alignment layer. In many embodiments, the birefringent grating may have rolled k-vectors. The K-vector is a vector aligned normal to the grating planes (or fringes) which determines the optical efficiency for a given range of input and diffracted angles. Rolling the K-vectors allows the angular bandwidth of the grating to be expanded without the need to increase the waveguide thickness. In many embodiments, the birefringent grating is a fold grating for providing exit pupil expansion. The fold grating may be based on any of the embodiments disclosed in PCT Application No.: PCT/GB2016000181 entitled WAVEGUIDE DISPLAY and embodiments discussed in the other references give above.


In some embodiments, the apparatus is used in a waveguide design to overcome the problem of laser banding. A waveguide according to the principles of the invention can provide a pupil shifting means for configuring the light coupled into the waveguide such that the input grating has an effective input aperture which is a function of the TIR angle. Several embodiments of the pupil shifting means will be described. The effect of the pupil shifting means is that successive light extractions from the waveguide by the output grating integrate to provide a substantially flat illumination profile for any light incidence angle at the input grating. The pupil shifting means can be implemented using the birefringence control layers to vary at least one of amplitude, polarization, phase, and wavefront displacement in 3D space as a function of incidence light angle. In each case, the effect is to provide an effective aperture that gives uniform extraction across the output grating for any light incidence angle at the input grating. In some embodiments, the pupil shifting means is provided at least in part by designing the optics of the input image generator to have a numerical aperture (NA) variation ranging from high NA on one side of the microdisplay panel varying smoothly to a low NA at the other side according to various embodiments, such as those similar to ones disclosed in PCT Application No.: PCT/GB2016000181 entitled WAVEGUIDE DISPLAY, the disclosure of which is hereby incorporated in its entirety. Typically, the microdisplay is a reflective device.


In some embodiments, the grating layer may be broken up into separate layers. The number of layers may then be laminated together into a single waveguide substrate. In many embodiments, the grating layer contains several pieces, including the input coupler, the fold grating, and the output grating (or portions thereof) that are laminated together to form a single substrate waveguide. The pieces may be separated by optical glue or other transparent material of refractive index matching that of the pieces. In several embodiments, the grating layer may be formed via a cell making process by creating cells of the desired grating thickness and vacuum filling each cell with SBG material for each of the input coupler, the fold grating and the output grating. In one embodiment, the cell is formed by positioning multiple plates of glass with gaps between the plates of glass that define the desired grating thickness for the input coupler, the fold grating and the output grating. In one embodiment, one cell may be made with multiple apertures such that the separate apertures are filled with different pockets of SBG material. Any intervening spaces may then be separated by a separating material (e.g., glue, oil, etc.) to define separate areas. In one embodiment, the SBG material may be spin-coated onto a substrate and then covered by a second substrate after curing of the material. By using a fold grating, the waveguide display advantageously requires fewer layers than previous systems and methods of displaying information according to some embodiments. In addition, by using a fold grating, light can travel by total internal refection within the waveguide in a single rectangular prism defined by the waveguide outer surfaces while achieving dual pupil expansion. In another embodiment, the input coupler, the gratings can be created by interfering two waves of light at an angle within the substrate to create a holographic wave front, thereby creating light and dark fringes that are set in the waveguide substrate at a desired angle. In some embodiments, the grating in a given layer is recorded in stepwise fashion by scanning or stepping the recording laser beams across the grating area. In some embodiments, the gratings are recorded using mastering and contact copying process currently used in the holographic printing industry.


In many embodiments, the gratings are Bragg gratings recorded in holographic polymer dispersed liquid crystal (HPDLC) as already discussed, although SBGs may also be recorded in other materials. In one embodiment, SBGs are recorded in a uniform modulation material, such as POLICRYPS or POLIPHEM having a matrix of solid liquid crystals dispersed in a liquid polymer. The SBGs can be switching or non-switching in nature. In its non-switching form a SBG has the advantage over conventional holographic photopolymer materials of being capable of providing high refractive index modulation due to its liquid crystal component. Exemplary uniform modulation liquid crystal-polymer material systems are disclosed in United State Patent Application Publication No.: US2007/0019152 by Caputo et al and PCT Application No.: PCT/EP2005/006950 by Stumpe et al., both of which are incorporated herein by reference in their entireties. Uniform modulation gratings are characterized by high refractive index modulation (and hence high diffraction efficiency) and low scatter. In some embodiments at least one of the gratings is a surface relief grating. In some embodiments at least one of the gratings is a thin (or Raman-Nath) hologram,


In some embodiments, the gratings are recorded in a reverse mode HPDLC material. Reverse mode HPDLC differs from conventional HPDLC in that the grating is passive when no electric field is applied and becomes diffractive in the presence of an electric field. The reverse mode HPDLC may be based on any of the recipes and processes disclosed in PCT Application No.: PCT/GB2012/000680, entitled IMPROVEMENTS TO HOLOGRAPHIC POLYMER DISPERSED LIQUID CRYSTAL MATERIALS AND DEVICES. The grating may be recorded in any of the above material systems but used in a passive (non-switching) mode. The fabrication process can be identical to that used for switched but with the electrode coating stage being omitted. LC polymer material systems may be used for their high index modulation. In some embodiments, the gratings are recorded in HPDLC but are not switched.


In many embodiments, a waveguide display according to the principles of the invention may be integrated within a window, for example, a windscreen-integrated HUD for road vehicle applications. In some embodiments, a window-integrated display may be based on the embodiments and teachings disclosed in U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 62/125,064 entitled OPTICAL WAVEGUIDE DISPLAYS FOR INTEGRATION IN WINDOWS and U.S. patent application Ser. No. 15/543,016 entitled ENVIRONMENTALLY ISOLATED WAVEGUIDE DISPLAY. In some embodiments, a waveguide display according to the principles of the invention may incorporate a light pipe for providing beam expansion in one direction based on the embodiments disclosed in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 15/558,409 entitled WAVEGUIDE DEVICE INCORPORATING A LIGHT PIPE. In some embodiments, the input image generator may be based on a laser scanner as disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 9,075,184 entitled COMPACT EDGE ILLUMINATED DIFFRACTIVE DISPLAY. The embodiments of the invention may be used in wide range of displays including HMDs for AR and VR, helmet mounted displays, projection displays, heads up displays (HUDs), Heads Down Displays, (HDDs), autostereoscopic displays and other 3D displays. Some of the embodiments and teachings of this disclosure may be applied in waveguide sensors such as, for example, eye trackers, fingerprint scanners and LIDAR systems and in illuminators and backlights.


It should be emphasized that the drawings are exemplary and that the dimensions have been exaggerated. For example, thicknesses of the SBG layers have been greatly exaggerated. Optical devices based on any of the above-described embodiments may be implemented using plastic substrates using the materials and processes disclosed in PCT Application No.: PCT/GB2012/000680, entitled IMPROVEMENTS TO HOLOGRAPHIC POLYMER DISPERSED LIQUID CRYSTAL MATERIALS AND DEVICES. In some embodiments, the dual expansion waveguide display may be curved.


Although the description has provided specific embodiments of the invention, additional information concerning the technology may be found in the following patent applications, which are incorporated by reference herein in their entireties: U.S. Pat. No. 9,075,184 entitled COMPACT EDGE ILLUMINATED DIFFRACTIVE DISPLAY, U.S. Pat. No. 8,233,204 entitled OPTICAL DISPLAYS, PCT Application No.: US2006/043938, entitled METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR PROVIDING A TRANSPARENT DISPLAY, PCT Application No.: GB2012/000677 entitled WEARABLE DATA DISPLAY, U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/317,468 entitled COMPACT EDGE ILLUMINATED EYEGLASS DISPLAY, U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/869,866 entitled HOLOGRAPHIC WIDE ANGLE DISPLAY, and U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/844,456 entitled TRANSPARENT WAVEGUIDE DISPLAY, U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/620,969 entitled WAVEGUIDE GRATING DEVICE, U.S. patent application Ser. No. 15/553,120 entitled ELECTRICALLY FOCUS TUNABLE LENS, U.S. patent application Ser. No. 15/558,409 entitled WAVEGUIDE DEVICE INCORPORATING A LIGHT PIPE, U.S. patent application Ser. No. 15/512,500 entitled METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR GENERATING INPUT IMAGES FOR HOLOGRAPHIC WAVEGUIDE DISPLAYS, U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 62/123,282 entitled NEAR EYE DISPLAY USING GRADIENT INDEX OPTICS, U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 62/124,550 entitled WAVEGUIDE DISPLAY USING GRADIENT INDEX OPTICS, U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 62/125,064 entitled OPTICAL WAVEGUIDE DISPLAYS FOR INTEGRATION IN WINDOWS, U.S. patent application Ser. No. 15/543,016 entitled ENVIRONMENTALLY ISOLATED WAVEGUIDE DISPLAY, U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 62/125,089 entitled HOLOGRAPHIC WAVEGUIDE LIGHT FIELD DISPLAYS, U.S. Pat. No. 8,224,133 entitled LASER ILLUMINATION DEVICE, U.S. Pat. No. 8,565,560 entitled LASER ILLUMINATION DEVICE, U.S. Pat. No. 6,115,152 entitled HOLOGRAPHIC ILLUMINATION SYSTEM, PCT Application No.: PCT/GB2013/000005 entitled CONTACT IMAGE SENSOR USING SWITCHABLE BRAGG GRATINGS, PCT Application No.: PCT/GB2012/000680, entitled IMPROVEMENTS TO HOLOGRAPHIC POLYMER DISPERSED LIQUID CRYSTAL MATERIALS AND DEVICES, PCT Application No.: PCT/GB2014/000197 entitled HOLOGRAPHIC WAVEGUIDE EYE TRACKER, PCT/GB2013/000210 entitled APPARATUS FOR EYE TRACKING, PCT Application No.:GB2013/000210 entitled APPARATUS FOR EYE TRACKING, PCT/GB2015/000274 entitled HOLOGRAPHIC WAVEGUIDE OPTICALTRACKER, U.S. Pat. No. 8,903,207 entitled SYSTEM AND METHOD OF EXTENDING VERTICAL FIELD OF VIEW IN HEAD UP DISPLAY USING A WAVEGUIDE COMBINER, U.S. Pat. No. 8,639,072 entitled COMPACT WEARABLE DISPLAY, U.S. Pat. No. 8,885,112 entitled COMPACT HOLOGRAPHIC EDGE ILLUMINATED EYEGLASS DISPLAY, U.S. patent application Ser. No. 16/086,578 entitled METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR PROVIDING A POLARIZATION SELECTIVE HOLOGRAPHIC WAVEGUIDE DEVICE, U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 62/493,578 entitled WAVEGUIDE DISPLAY APPARATUS, PCT Application No.: PCT/GB2016000181 entitled WAVEGUIDE DISPLAY, U.S. Patent Application No. 62/497,781 entitled APPARATUS FOR HOMOGENIZING THE OUTPUT FROM A WAVEGUIDE DEVICE, U.S. Patent Application No. 62/499,423 entitled WAVEGUIDE DEVICE WITH UNIFORM OUTPUT ILLUMINATION.


DOCTRINE OF EQUIVALENTS

The construction and arrangement of the systems and methods as shown in the various exemplary embodiments are illustrative only. Although only a few embodiments have been described in detail in this disclosure, many modifications are possible (for example, variations in sizes, dimensions, structures, shapes and proportions of the various elements, values of parameters, mounting arrangements, use of materials, colors, orientations, etc.). For example, the position of elements may be reversed or otherwise varied, and the nature or number of discrete elements or positions may be altered or varied. Accordingly, all such modifications are intended to be included within the scope of the present disclosure. The order or sequence of any process or method steps may be varied or re-sequenced according to alternative embodiments. Other substitutions, modifications, changes, and omissions may be made in the design, operating conditions and arrangement of the exemplary embodiments without departing from the scope of the present disclosure.

Claims
  • 1. A waveguide comprising: at least one waveguide substrate;at least one grating;at least one polarization modifying layer, wherein the at least one polarization modifying layer is a liquid crystal and polymer system aligned using directional ultraviolet radiation;a light source for outputting light;an input coupler for directing the light into total internal reflection paths within the waveguide; andan output coupler for extracting light from the waveguide, wherein the interaction of the light with the at least one polarization modifying layer and the at least one grating provides a predefined characteristic of light extracted from the waveguide.
  • 2. A wavequide comprising: at least one wavequide substrate;at least one grating;at least one polarization modifying layer;a light source for outputting light;an input coupler for directing the light into total internal reflection paths within the wavequide; andan output coupler for extracting light from the waveguide, wherein the interaction of the light with the at least one polarization modifying layer and the at least one grating provides a predefined characteristic of light extracted from the wavequide,wherein the at least one grating includes a birefringent grating formed in a liquid crystal and polymer system, andwherein the at least one polarization modifying layer influences the alignment of LC directors in the birefringent grating.
  • 3. A wavequide comprising: at least one waveguide substrate;at least one grating;at least one polarization modifying layer, wherein the at least one polarization modifying layer comprises at least one stack of refractive index layers disposed on at least one optical surface of the waveguide, and wherein at least one layer in the stack of refractive index layers has an isotropic refractive index and at least one layer in the stack of refractive index layers has an anisotropic refractive index;a light source for outputting light;an input coupler for directing the light into total internal reflection paths within the waveguide; andan output coupler for extracting light from the waveguide, wherein the interaction of the light with the at least one polarization modifying layer and the at least one grating provides a predefined characteristic of light extracted from the waveguide.
  • 4. A waveguide comprising: at least one waveguide substrate;at least one grating;at least one polarization modifying layer, wherein the at least one polarization modifying layer provides optical power;a light source for outputting light;an input coupler for directing the light into total internal reflection paths within the waveguide; andan output coupler for extracting light from the waveguide, wherein the interaction of the light with the at least one polarization modifying layer and the at least one grating provides a predefined characteristic of light extracted from the waveguide.
  • 5. The waveguide of claim 1, wherein the predefined characteristic comprises at least one of: uniform illumination and uniform polarization over the angular range of the light.
  • 6. The waveguide of claim 1, wherein the at least one polarization modifying layer provides compensation for polarization rotation introduced by the at least one grating along at least one direction of light propagation within the waveguide.
  • 7. The waveguide of claim 1, wherein the at least one polarization modifying layer is a liquid crystal and polymer material system.
  • 8. The waveguide of claim 1, wherein the interaction of light with the at least one polarization modifying layer provides at least one of: an angular or spectral bandwidth variation; a polarization rotation; a birefringence variation; an angular or spectral dependence of at least one of beam transmission or polarization rotation; or a light transmission variation in at least one direction in the plane of the waveguide substrate.
  • 9. The waveguide of claim 1, wherein the at least one polarization modifying layer is aligned by at least one of: electromagnetic radiation; electrical or magnetic fields; mechanical forces; chemical reaction; or thermal exposure.
  • 10. The waveguide of claim 1, wherein the predefined characteristic varies across the waveguide.
  • 11. The waveguide of claim 1, wherein the at least one polarization modifying layer has an anisotropic refractive index.
  • 12. The waveguide of claim 1, wherein the at least one polarization modifying layer is formed on at least one internal or external optical surface of the waveguide.
  • 13. The waveguide of claim 1, wherein the predefined characteristic results from the cumulative effect of the interaction of the light with the at least one polarization modifying layer and the at least one grating along at least one direction of light propagation within the waveguide.
  • 14. The waveguide of claim 1, wherein the at least one polarization modifying layer is reflective.
  • 15. The waveguide of claim 1, wherein the at least one grating comprises two or more gratings configured as a stack.
  • 16. The waveguide of claim 1, wherein the at least one polarization modifying layer provides an environmental isolation layer for the waveguide.
  • 17. The waveguide of claim 1, wherein the at least one polarization modifying layer has a gradient index structure.
  • 18. The waveguide of claim 1, wherein the at least one polarization modifying layer is formed by stretching a layer of an optical material to spatially vary its refractive index in the plane of the waveguide substrate.
  • 19. The waveguide of claim 1, wherein the light source provides collimated light in angular space.
  • 20. The waveguide of claim 1, wherein at least one of the input coupler and output coupler comprises a birefringent grating.
  • 21. The waveguide of claim 1, wherein the at least one grating is formed in a birefringent material.
  • 22. The waveguide of claim 1, wherein the at least one grating is a surface relief grating.
  • 23. The waveguide of claim 1, wherein the at least one grating is a fold grating.
  • 24. The waveguide of claim 1, wherein the at least one grating comprises two or more gratings multiplexed in a layer.
CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS

The current application is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 16/906,872 entitled “Holographic Waveguides Incorporating Birefringence Control and Methods for Their Fabrication,” filed Jun. 19, 2020, which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 16/357,233 entitled “Holographic Waveguides Incorporating Birefringence Control and Methods for Their Fabrication,” filed Mar. 18, 2019, which claims the benefit of and priority under 35 U.S.C. § 119(e) to U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 62/643,977 entitled “Holographic Waveguides Incorporating Birefringence Control and Methods for Their Fabrication,” filed Mar. 16, 2018. The disclosures which are hereby incorporated by reference in their entireties for all purposes.

US Referenced Citations (806)
Number Name Date Kind
1043938 Huttenlocher Nov 1912 A
3482498 Becker Dec 1969 A
3741716 Johne et al. Jun 1973 A
3843231 Borel et al. Oct 1974 A
3965029 Arora Jun 1976 A
3975711 McMahon Aug 1976 A
4035068 Rawson Jul 1977 A
4066334 Fray et al. Jan 1978 A
4248093 Andersson et al. Feb 1981 A
4251137 Knop et al. Feb 1981 A
4322163 Schiller Mar 1982 A
4386361 Simmonds May 1983 A
4389612 Simmonds et al. Jun 1983 A
4403189 Simmonds Sep 1983 A
4418993 Lipton Dec 1983 A
4472037 Lipton Sep 1984 A
4523226 Lipton et al. Jun 1985 A
4544267 Schiller Oct 1985 A
4562463 Lipton Dec 1985 A
4566758 Bos et al. Jan 1986 A
4583117 Lipton et al. Apr 1986 A
4643515 Upatnieks Feb 1987 A
4688900 Doane et al. Aug 1987 A
4711512 Upatnieks Dec 1987 A
4728547 Vaz et al. Mar 1988 A
4729640 Sakata et al. Mar 1988 A
4765703 Suzuki et al. Aug 1988 A
4791788 Simmonds et al. Dec 1988 A
4792850 Liptoh et al. Dec 1988 A
4811414 Fishbine et al. Mar 1989 A
4848093 Simmonds et al. Jul 1989 A
4884876 Lipton et al. Dec 1989 A
4890902 Doane et al. Jan 1990 A
4933976 Fishbine et al. Jun 1990 A
4938568 Margerum et al. Jul 1990 A
4960311 Moss et al. Oct 1990 A
4964701 Dorschner et al. Oct 1990 A
4967268 Lipton et al. Oct 1990 A
4970129 Ingwall et al. Nov 1990 A
4971719 Vaz et al. Nov 1990 A
4994204 Doane et al. Feb 1991 A
5004323 West Apr 1991 A
5009483 Rockwell et al. Apr 1991 A
5033814 Brown et al. Jul 1991 A
5053834 Simmonds Oct 1991 A
5063441 Lipton et al. Nov 1991 A
5096282 Margerum et al. Mar 1992 A
5099343 Margerum et al. Mar 1992 A
5110034 Simmonds et al. May 1992 A
5117302 Lipton May 1992 A
5119454 McMahon et al. Jun 1992 A
5139192 Simmonds et al. Aug 1992 A
5142357 Lipton et al. Aug 1992 A
5142644 Vansteenkiste et al. Aug 1992 A
5148302 Nagano et al. Sep 1992 A
5181133 Lipton Jan 1993 A
5193000 Lipton et al. Mar 1993 A
5198912 Ingwall et al. Mar 1993 A
5200861 Moskovich et al. Apr 1993 A
5218480 Moskovich et al. Jun 1993 A
5224198 Jachimowicz et al. Jun 1993 A
5239372 Lipton Aug 1993 A
5240636 Doane et al. Aug 1993 A
5241337 Betensky et al. Aug 1993 A
5242476 Bartel et al. Sep 1993 A
5251048 Doane et al. Oct 1993 A
5264950 West et al. Nov 1993 A
5268792 Kreitzer et al. Dec 1993 A
5284499 Harvey et al. Feb 1994 A
5295208 Caulfield et al. Mar 1994 A
5296967 Moskovich et al. Mar 1994 A
5299289 Omae et al. Mar 1994 A
5309283 Kreitzer et al. May 1994 A
5313330 Betensky May 1994 A
5315324 Kubelik et al. May 1994 A
5315419 Saupe et al. May 1994 A
5315440 Betensky et al. May 1994 A
5327269 Tilton et al. Jul 1994 A
5329363 Moskovich et al. Jul 1994 A
5343147 Sager et al. Aug 1994 A
5368770 Saupe et al. Nov 1994 A
5371626 Betensky Dec 1994 A
5416510 Lipton et al. May 1995 A
5418871 Revelli et al. May 1995 A
5428480 Betensky et al. Jun 1995 A
5437811 Doane et al. Aug 1995 A
5452385 Izumi et al. Sep 1995 A
5453863 West et al. Sep 1995 A
5455693 Wreede et al. Oct 1995 A
5455713 Kreitzer et al. Oct 1995 A
5463428 Lipton et al. Oct 1995 A
5465311 Caulfield et al. Nov 1995 A
5476611 Nolan et al. Dec 1995 A
5481321 Lipton Jan 1996 A
5485313 Betensky Jan 1996 A
5493430 Lu et al. Feb 1996 A
5493448 Betensky et al. Feb 1996 A
5499140 Betensky Mar 1996 A
5500769 Betensky Mar 1996 A
5515184 Caulfield et al. May 1996 A
5516455 Jacobine et al. May 1996 A
5530566 Kumar Jun 1996 A
5532875 Betemsky Jul 1996 A
RE35310 Moskovich Aug 1996 E
5543950 Lavrentovich et al. Aug 1996 A
5559637 Moskovich et al. Sep 1996 A
5572250 Lipton et al. Nov 1996 A
5576888 Betensky Nov 1996 A
5585035 Nerad et al. Dec 1996 A
5593615 Nerad et al. Jan 1997 A
5619586 Sibbald et al. Apr 1997 A
5621529 Gordon et al. Apr 1997 A
5621552 Coates et al. Apr 1997 A
5625495 Moskovich et al. Apr 1997 A
5668614 Chien et al. Sep 1997 A
5677797 Betensky et al. Oct 1997 A
5680231 Grinberg et al. Oct 1997 A
5682255 Friesem et al. Oct 1997 A
5686931 Fuenfschilling et al. Nov 1997 A
5686975 Lipton Nov 1997 A
5691795 Doane et al. Nov 1997 A
5695682 Doane et al. Dec 1997 A
5706136 Okuyama et al. Jan 1998 A
5710645 Phillips et al. Jan 1998 A
5745266 Smith et al. Apr 1998 A
5745301 Betensky et al. Apr 1998 A
5748272 Tanaka et al. May 1998 A
5748277 Huang et al. May 1998 A
5751452 Tanaka et al. May 1998 A
5757546 Lipton et al. May 1998 A
5790314 Duck et al. Aug 1998 A
5798641 Spagna et al. Aug 1998 A
5808804 Moskovich Sep 1998 A
5822089 Phillips et al. Oct 1998 A
5825448 Bos et al. Oct 1998 A
5831700 Li et al. Nov 1998 A
5835661 Tai et al. Nov 1998 A
5841587 Moskovich et al. Nov 1998 A
5856842 Tedesco Jan 1999 A
5867238 Miller et al. Feb 1999 A
5870228 Kreitzer et al. Feb 1999 A
5875012 Crawford et al. Feb 1999 A
5877826 Yang et al. Mar 1999 A
5892599 Bahuguna Apr 1999 A
5900987 Kreitzer et al. May 1999 A
5900989 Kreitzer May 1999 A
5929960 West et al. Jul 1999 A
5930433 Williamson et al. Jul 1999 A
5936776 Kreitzer Aug 1999 A
5937115 Domash Aug 1999 A
5942157 Sutherland et al. Aug 1999 A
5949508 Kumar et al. Sep 1999 A
5956113 Crawford Sep 1999 A
5963375 Kreitzer Oct 1999 A
5966223 Friesem et al. Oct 1999 A
5969874 Moskovich Oct 1999 A
5969876 Kreitzer et al. Oct 1999 A
5973727 McGrew et al. Oct 1999 A
5974162 Metz et al. Oct 1999 A
5986746 Metz et al. Nov 1999 A
5999089 Carlson et al. Dec 1999 A
5999282 Suzuki et al. Dec 1999 A
6014187 Taketomi et al. Jan 2000 A
6023375 Kreitzer Feb 2000 A
6046585 Simmonds Apr 2000 A
6052540 Koyama Apr 2000 A
6061107 Yang May 2000 A
6061463 Metz et al. May 2000 A
6094311 Moskovich Jul 2000 A
6097551 Kreitzer Aug 2000 A
6104448 Doane et al. Aug 2000 A
6115152 Popovich et al. Sep 2000 A
6128058 Walton et al. Oct 2000 A
6133971 Silverstein et al. Oct 2000 A
6133975 Li et al. Oct 2000 A
6141074 Bos et al. Oct 2000 A
6141154 Kreitzer et al. Oct 2000 A
6151142 Phillips et al. Nov 2000 A
6154190 Yang et al. Nov 2000 A
6169594 Aye et al. Jan 2001 B1
6169613 Amitai et al. Jan 2001 B1
6169636 Kreitzer et al. Jan 2001 B1
6188462 Lavrentovich et al. Feb 2001 B1
6191887 Michaloski et al. Feb 2001 B1
6195209 Kreitzer et al. Feb 2001 B1
6204835 Yang et al. Mar 2001 B1
6211976 Popovich et al. Apr 2001 B1
6268839 Yang et al. Jul 2001 B1
6269203 Davies et al. Jul 2001 B1
6275031 Simmonds et al. Aug 2001 B1
6278429 Ruth et al. Aug 2001 B1
6297860 Moskovich et al. Oct 2001 B1
6301056 Kreitzer et al. Oct 2001 B1
6301057 Kreitzer et al. Oct 2001 B1
6317228 Popovich et al. Nov 2001 B2
6320563 Yang et al. Nov 2001 B1
6324014 Moskovich et al. Nov 2001 B1
6330109 Ishii et al. Dec 2001 B1
6366281 Lipton et al. Apr 2002 B1
6377238 McPheters Apr 2002 B1
6377321 Khan et al. Apr 2002 B1
6388797 Lipton et al. May 2002 B1
6411444 Moskovich et al. Jun 2002 B1
6414760 Lopez et al. Jul 2002 B1
6417971 Moskovich et al. Jul 2002 B1
6437563 Simmonds et al. Aug 2002 B1
6445512 Moskovich et al. Sep 2002 B1
6476974 Kreitzer et al. Nov 2002 B1
6483303 Simmonds et al. Nov 2002 B2
6504629 Popovich et al. Jan 2003 B1
6509937 Moskovich et al. Jan 2003 B1
6518747 Sager et al. Feb 2003 B2
6519088 Lipton Feb 2003 B1
6529336 Kreitzer et al. Mar 2003 B1
6559813 DeLuca et al. May 2003 B1
6563648 Gleckman et al. May 2003 B2
6563650 Moskovich et al. May 2003 B2
6567573 Domash et al. May 2003 B1
6577411 David et al. Jun 2003 B1
6577429 Kurtz et al. Jun 2003 B1
6580529 Amitai et al. Jun 2003 B1
6583838 Hoke et al. Jun 2003 B1
6594090 Kruschwitz et al. Jul 2003 B2
6597176 Simmonds et al. Jul 2003 B2
6597475 Shirakura et al. Jul 2003 B1
6600590 Roddy et al. Jul 2003 B2
6618104 Date et al. Sep 2003 B1
6625381 Roddy et al. Sep 2003 B2
6646772 Popovich et al. Nov 2003 B1
6667134 Sutherland et al. Dec 2003 B1
6677086 Sutehrland et al. Jan 2004 B1
6692666 Sutherland et al. Feb 2004 B2
6699407 Sutehrland et al. Mar 2004 B1
6706086 Emig et al. Mar 2004 B2
6706451 Sutherland et al. Mar 2004 B1
6730442 Sutherland et al. May 2004 B1
6731434 Hua et al. May 2004 B1
6738105 Hannah et al. May 2004 B1
6747781 Trisnadi et al. Jun 2004 B2
6791629 Moskovich et al. Sep 2004 B2
6791739 Ramanujan et al. Sep 2004 B2
6804066 Ha et al. Oct 2004 B1
6805490 Levola Oct 2004 B2
6821457 Natarajan et al. Nov 2004 B1
6822713 Yaroshchuk et al. Nov 2004 B1
6825987 Repetto et al. Nov 2004 B2
6829095 Amitai Dec 2004 B2
6830789 Doane et al. Dec 2004 B2
6833955 Niv Dec 2004 B2
6847488 Travis Jan 2005 B2
6850210 Lipton et al. Feb 2005 B1
6853493 Kreitzer et al. Feb 2005 B2
6867888 Sutherland et al. Mar 2005 B2
6878494 Sutehrland et al. Apr 2005 B2
6927570 Simmonds et al. Aug 2005 B2
6927694 Smith et al. Aug 2005 B1
6950173 Sutherland et al. Sep 2005 B1
6952435 Lai et al. Oct 2005 B2
6958868 Pender Oct 2005 B1
6963454 Martins et al. Nov 2005 B1
6975345 Lipton et al. Dec 2005 B1
6980365 Moskovich Dec 2005 B2
6985296 Lipton et al. Jan 2006 B2
6999239 Martins et al. Feb 2006 B1
7002618 Lipton et al. Feb 2006 B2
7002753 Moskovich et al. Feb 2006 B2
7009773 Chaoulov et al. Mar 2006 B2
7018563 Sutherland et al. Mar 2006 B1
7018686 Sutehrland et al. Mar 2006 B2
7019793 Moskovich et al. Mar 2006 B2
7021777 Amitai Apr 2006 B2
7026892 Kajiya Apr 2006 B2
7054045 McPheters et al. May 2006 B2
7068405 Sutherland et al. Jun 2006 B2
7072020 Sutherland et al. Jul 2006 B1
7075273 O'Gorman et al. Jul 2006 B2
7077984 Natarajan et al. Jul 2006 B1
7081215 Natarajan et al. Jul 2006 B2
7088457 Zou et al. Aug 2006 B1
7088515 Lipton Aug 2006 B2
7099080 Lipton et al. Aug 2006 B2
7108383 Mitchell et al. Sep 2006 B1
7119965 Rolland et al. Oct 2006 B1
7123421 Moskovich et al. Oct 2006 B1
7133084 Moskovich et al. Nov 2006 B2
7139109 Mukawa Nov 2006 B2
RE39424 Moskovich Dec 2006 E
7145729 Kreitzer et al. Dec 2006 B2
7149385 Parikka et al. Dec 2006 B2
7167286 Anderson et al. Jan 2007 B2
7175780 Sutherland et al. Feb 2007 B1
7181108 Levola Feb 2007 B2
7184002 Lipton et al. Feb 2007 B2
7184615 Levola Feb 2007 B2
7186567 Sutherland et al. Mar 2007 B1
7198737 Natarajan et al. Apr 2007 B2
7206107 Levola Apr 2007 B2
7230770 Kreitzer et al. Jun 2007 B2
7256915 Sutherland et al. Aug 2007 B2
7265882 Sutherland et al. Sep 2007 B2
7265903 Sutherland et al. Sep 2007 B2
RE39911 Moskovich Nov 2007 E
7301601 Lin et al. Nov 2007 B2
7312906 Sutherland et al. Dec 2007 B2
7333685 Stone et al. Feb 2008 B2
7359597 Iazikov et al. Apr 2008 B1
7375886 Lipton et al. May 2008 B2
7391573 Amitai Jun 2008 B2
7413678 Natarajan et al. Aug 2008 B1
7413679 Sutherland et al. Aug 2008 B1
7416818 Sutherland et al. Aug 2008 B2
7418170 Mukawa et al. Aug 2008 B2
7420733 Natarajan et al. Sep 2008 B1
7453612 Mukawa Nov 2008 B2
7454103 Parriaux Nov 2008 B2
7457040 Amitai Nov 2008 B2
7477206 Cowan et al. Jan 2009 B2
7499217 Cakmakci et al. Mar 2009 B2
7511891 Messerschmidt Mar 2009 B2
7522344 Curatu et al. Apr 2009 B1
7570322 Sutherland et al. Aug 2009 B1
7570405 Sutherland et al. Aug 2009 B1
7577326 Amitai Aug 2009 B2
7583423 Sutherland et al. Sep 2009 B2
7589901 DeJong et al. Sep 2009 B2
7605882 Sutherland et al. Oct 2009 B1
7619739 Sutherland et al. Nov 2009 B1
7639208 Ha et al. Dec 2009 B1
7643214 Amitai Jan 2010 B2
7672055 Amitai Mar 2010 B2
7672549 Ghosh et al. Mar 2010 B2
7710622 Takabayashi et al. May 2010 B2
7724443 Amitai May 2010 B2
7740387 Schultz et al. Jun 2010 B2
7747113 Mukawa et al. Jun 2010 B2
7751122 Amitai Jul 2010 B2
7751662 Kleemann et al. Jul 2010 B2
7764413 Levola Jul 2010 B2
7777819 Simmonds Aug 2010 B2
7843642 Shaoulov et al. Nov 2010 B2
7866869 Karakawa Jan 2011 B2
7872707 Sutherland et al. Jan 2011 B1
7884593 Simmonds et al. Feb 2011 B2
7884985 Amitai et al. Feb 2011 B2
7907342 Simmonds et al. Mar 2011 B2
7936519 Mukawa et al. May 2011 B2
7944616 Mukawa May 2011 B2
7949214 DeJong et al. May 2011 B2
7969657 Cakmakci et al. Jun 2011 B2
8000020 Amitai et al. Aug 2011 B2
8014050 McGrew Sep 2011 B2
8016475 Travis Sep 2011 B2
8018579 Krah Sep 2011 B1
8023783 Mukawa et al. Sep 2011 B2
8073296 Mukawa et al. Dec 2011 B2
8077274 Sutherland et al. Dec 2011 B2
8093451 Spangenberg et al. Jan 2012 B2
8098439 Amitai et al. Jan 2012 B2
8107023 Simmonds et al. Jan 2012 B2
8107780 Simmonds Jan 2012 B2
8132948 Owen et al. Mar 2012 B2
8134434 Diederichs et al. Mar 2012 B2
8142016 Legerton et al. Mar 2012 B2
8155489 Saarikko et al. Apr 2012 B2
8160411 Levola et al. Apr 2012 B2
8167173 Simmonds et al. May 2012 B1
8194325 Levola et al. Jun 2012 B2
8213065 Mukawa Jul 2012 B2
8213755 Mukawa et al. Jul 2012 B2
8220966 Mukawa Jul 2012 B2
8224133 Popovich et al. Jul 2012 B2
8233204 Robbins et al. Jul 2012 B1
8294749 Cable Oct 2012 B2
8310327 Willers et al. Nov 2012 B2
8314993 Levola et al. Nov 2012 B2
8320032 Levola Nov 2012 B2
8325166 Akutsu et al. Dec 2012 B2
8329773 Fäcke et al. Dec 2012 B2
8335040 Mukawa et al. Dec 2012 B2
8351744 Travis et al. Jan 2013 B2
8354640 Hamre et al. Jan 2013 B2
8355610 Simmonds Jan 2013 B2
8369019 Baker et al. Feb 2013 B2
8376548 Schultz Feb 2013 B2
8382293 Phillips, III et al. Feb 2013 B2
8384504 Diederichs et al. Feb 2013 B2
8396339 Mukawa et al. Mar 2013 B2
8422840 Large Apr 2013 B2
8432614 Amitai Apr 2013 B2
8441731 Sprague May 2013 B2
8466953 Levola Jun 2013 B2
8472120 Border et al. Jun 2013 B2
8481130 Harding et al. Jul 2013 B2
8482858 Sprague Jul 2013 B2
8488246 Border et al. Jul 2013 B2
8491136 Travis et al. Jul 2013 B2
8493662 Noui Jul 2013 B2
8494229 Jarvenpaa et al. Jul 2013 B2
8520309 Sprague Aug 2013 B2
8547638 Levola Oct 2013 B2
8548290 Travers et al. Oct 2013 B2
8565560 Popovich et al. Oct 2013 B2
8582206 Travis Nov 2013 B2
8593734 Laakkonen Nov 2013 B2
8611014 Valera et al. Dec 2013 B2
8634120 Popovich et al. Jan 2014 B2
8639072 Popovich et al. Jan 2014 B2
8643948 Amitai et al. Feb 2014 B2
8649099 Schultz et al. Feb 2014 B2
8654420 Simmonds Feb 2014 B2
8659826 Brown et al. Feb 2014 B1
D701206 Luckey et al. Mar 2014 S
8698705 Burke Apr 2014 B2
8731350 Lin et al. May 2014 B1
8736963 Robbins et al. May 2014 B2
8746008 Mauritsen et al. Jun 2014 B1
8786923 Chuang et al. Jul 2014 B2
8810913 Simmonds et al. Aug 2014 B2
8810914 Amitai Aug 2014 B2
8817350 Robbins et al. Aug 2014 B1
8824836 Sugiyama Sep 2014 B2
8830584 Saarikko et al. Sep 2014 B2
8842368 Simmonds et al. Sep 2014 B2
8859412 Jain Oct 2014 B2
8872435 Kreitzer et al. Oct 2014 B2
8873149 Bohn et al. Oct 2014 B2
8873150 Amitai Oct 2014 B2
8885112 Popovich et al. Nov 2014 B2
8885997 Nguyen et al. Nov 2014 B2
8903207 Brown et al. Dec 2014 B1
8906088 Pugh et al. Dec 2014 B2
8913865 Bennett Dec 2014 B1
8917453 Bohn Dec 2014 B2
8937771 Robbins et al. Jan 2015 B2
8950867 Macnamara Feb 2015 B2
8964298 Haddick et al. Feb 2015 B2
8965152 Simmonds Feb 2015 B2
8985803 Bohn Mar 2015 B2
8989535 Robbins Mar 2015 B2
9019595 Jain Apr 2015 B2
9025253 Hadad et al. May 2015 B2
9035344 Jain May 2015 B2
9069228 Han et al. Jun 2015 B2
9075184 Popovich et al. Jul 2015 B2
9081178 Simmonds et al. Jul 2015 B2
9128226 Fattal et al. Sep 2015 B2
9129295 Border et al. Sep 2015 B2
9164290 Robbins et al. Oct 2015 B2
9201270 Fattal et al. Dec 2015 B2
9215293 Miller Dec 2015 B2
9269854 Jain Feb 2016 B2
9274338 Robbins et al. Mar 2016 B2
9310566 Valera et al. Apr 2016 B2
9329325 Simmonds et al. May 2016 B2
9341846 Popovich et al. May 2016 B2
9354366 Jain May 2016 B2
9366862 Haddick et al. Jun 2016 B2
9372347 Levola et al. Jun 2016 B1
9377623 Robbins et al. Jun 2016 B2
9389415 Fattal et al. Jul 2016 B2
9400395 Travers et al. Jul 2016 B2
9423360 Kostamo et al. Aug 2016 B1
9431794 Jain Aug 2016 B2
9459451 Saarikko et al. Oct 2016 B2
9465213 Simmonds Oct 2016 B2
9494799 Robbins et al. Nov 2016 B2
9541383 Abovitz et al. Jan 2017 B2
9547174 Gao et al. Jan 2017 B2
9551874 Amitai Jan 2017 B2
9551880 Amitai Jan 2017 B2
9612403 Abovitz et al. Apr 2017 B2
9632226 Waldern et al. Apr 2017 B2
9651368 Abovitz et al. May 2017 B2
9664824 Simmonds et al. May 2017 B2
9664910 Mansharof et al. May 2017 B2
9727772 Popovich et al. Aug 2017 B2
9746688 Popovich et al. Aug 2017 B2
10569449 Curts et al. Feb 2020 B1
10578876 Lam et al. Mar 2020 B1
10598938 Huang et al. Mar 2020 B1
10613268 Colburn et al. Apr 2020 B1
10649119 Mohanty et al. May 2020 B2
10690831 Calafiore Jun 2020 B2
10690851 Waldern et al. Jun 2020 B2
10732351 Colburn et al. Aug 2020 B2
10823887 Calafiore et al. Nov 2020 B1
10983257 Colburn et al. Apr 2021 B1
11103892 Liao et al. Aug 2021 B1
11107972 Diest et al. Aug 2021 B2
11137603 Zhang Oct 2021 B2
11150408 Waldern et al. Oct 2021 B2
11243333 Ouderkirk et al. Feb 2022 B1
11306193 Lane et al. Apr 2022 B1
11307357 Mohanty Apr 2022 B2
11340386 Ouderkirk et al. May 2022 B1
11391950 Calafiore Jul 2022 B2
20010043163 Waldern et al. Nov 2001 A1
20010050756 Lipton et al. Dec 2001 A1
20020003509 Lipton et al. Jan 2002 A1
20020009299 Lipton Jan 2002 A1
20020011969 Lipton et al. Jan 2002 A1
20020036825 Lipton et al. Mar 2002 A1
20020047837 Suyama Apr 2002 A1
20020110077 Drobot et al. Aug 2002 A1
20020126332 Popovich Sep 2002 A1
20020196332 Lipton et al. Dec 2002 A1
20030007070 Lipton et al. Jan 2003 A1
20030038912 Broer et al. Feb 2003 A1
20030067685 Niv Apr 2003 A1
20030086670 Moridaira et al. May 2003 A1
20030107809 Chen et al. Jun 2003 A1
20030197157 Sutherland et al. Oct 2003 A1
20030202247 Niv Oct 2003 A1
20040004767 Song Jan 2004 A1
20040089842 Sutehrland et al. May 2004 A1
20040109234 Levola Jun 2004 A1
20040112862 Willson et al. Jun 2004 A1
20040141217 Endo et al. Jul 2004 A1
20040175627 Sutherland et al. Sep 2004 A1
20040179764 Melikechi et al. Sep 2004 A1
20040263969 Lipton et al. Dec 2004 A1
20040263971 Lipton et al. Dec 2004 A1
20050018304 Lipton et al. Jan 2005 A1
20050079663 Masutani et al. Apr 2005 A1
20050105909 Stone May 2005 A1
20050122395 Lipton et al. Jun 2005 A1
20050134404 Kajiya et al. Jun 2005 A1
20050141066 Ouchi Jun 2005 A1
20050180687 Amitai Aug 2005 A1
20050195276 Lipton et al. Sep 2005 A1
20050232530 Kekas Oct 2005 A1
20050265585 Rowe Dec 2005 A1
20050271258 Rowe Dec 2005 A1
20050286133 Lipton Dec 2005 A1
20060012878 Lipton et al. Jan 2006 A1
20060043938 O'Gorman et al. Mar 2006 A1
20060119837 Raguin et al. Jun 2006 A1
20060132914 Weiss et al. Jun 2006 A1
20060146422 Koike Jul 2006 A1
20060171647 Ye et al. Aug 2006 A1
20060191293 Kuczma Aug 2006 A1
20060215244 Yosha et al. Sep 2006 A1
20060228073 Mukawa Oct 2006 A1
20060268104 Cowan et al. Nov 2006 A1
20060268412 Downing et al. Nov 2006 A1
20060284974 Lipton et al. Dec 2006 A1
20060285205 Lipton et al. Dec 2006 A1
20060291052 Lipton et al. Dec 2006 A1
20070012777 Tsikos et al. Jan 2007 A1
20070019152 Caputo et al. Jan 2007 A1
20070041684 Popovich et al. Feb 2007 A1
20070070476 Yamada et al. Mar 2007 A1
20070097502 Lipton et al. May 2007 A1
20070109401 Lipton et al. May 2007 A1
20070133089 Lipton et al. Jun 2007 A1
20070154153 Fomitchov et al. Jul 2007 A1
20070160325 Son et al. Jul 2007 A1
20070177007 Lipton et al. Aug 2007 A1
20070183650 Lipton et al. Aug 2007 A1
20070188602 Cowan et al. Aug 2007 A1
20070206155 Lipton Sep 2007 A1
20070236560 Lipton et al. Oct 2007 A1
20070237456 Blauvelt et al. Oct 2007 A1
20070247687 Handschy et al. Oct 2007 A1
20070258138 Cowan et al. Nov 2007 A1
20070263169 Lipton Nov 2007 A1
20080018851 Lipton et al. Jan 2008 A1
20080024598 Perlin et al. Jan 2008 A1
20080043334 Itzkovitch et al. Feb 2008 A1
20080049100 Lipton et al. Feb 2008 A1
20080062259 Lipton et al. Mar 2008 A1
20080106775 Amitai et al. May 2008 A1
20080106779 Peterson et al. May 2008 A1
20080117289 Schowengerdt et al. May 2008 A1
20080138013 Parriaux Jun 2008 A1
20080143964 Cowan et al. Jun 2008 A1
20080143965 Cowan et al. Jun 2008 A1
20080149517 Lipton et al. Jun 2008 A1
20080151370 Cook et al. Jun 2008 A1
20080186573 Lipton Aug 2008 A1
20080186574 Robinson et al. Aug 2008 A1
20080197518 Aylward et al. Aug 2008 A1
20080198471 Amitai Aug 2008 A1
20080226281 Lipton Sep 2008 A1
20080239067 Lipton Oct 2008 A1
20080239068 Lipton Oct 2008 A1
20080273081 Lipton Nov 2008 A1
20080285137 Simmonds et al. Nov 2008 A1
20080297731 Powell et al. Dec 2008 A1
20080298649 Ennis et al. Dec 2008 A1
20080303895 Akka et al. Dec 2008 A1
20080303896 Lipton et al. Dec 2008 A1
20080304111 Queenan et al. Dec 2008 A1
20080316303 Chiu et al. Dec 2008 A1
20080316375 Lipton et al. Dec 2008 A1
20090052047 Amitai Feb 2009 A1
20090074356 Sanchez et al. Mar 2009 A1
20090128495 Kong et al. May 2009 A1
20090128911 Itzkovitch et al. May 2009 A1
20090141324 Mukawa Jun 2009 A1
20090190222 Simmonds et al. Jul 2009 A1
20090242021 Petkie et al. Oct 2009 A1
20090296218 Ryytty Dec 2009 A1
20090303599 Levola Dec 2009 A1
20100014312 Travis et al. Jan 2010 A1
20100039796 Mukawa Feb 2010 A1
20100053565 Mizushima et al. Mar 2010 A1
20100079865 Saarikko et al. Apr 2010 A1
20100086256 Ben Bakir et al. Apr 2010 A1
20100097674 Kasazumi et al. Apr 2010 A1
20100097820 Owen et al. Apr 2010 A1
20100103078 Mukawa et al. Apr 2010 A1
20100134534 Seesselberg et al. Jun 2010 A1
20100149073 Chaum et al. Jun 2010 A1
20100220293 Mizushima et al. Sep 2010 A1
20100231532 Nho et al. Sep 2010 A1
20100246003 Simmonds et al. Sep 2010 A1
20100246004 Simmonds Sep 2010 A1
20100284085 Laakkonen Nov 2010 A1
20100284090 Simmonds Nov 2010 A1
20100284180 Popovich et al. Nov 2010 A1
20100321781 Levola et al. Dec 2010 A1
20110019874 Jarvenpaa et al. Jan 2011 A1
20110026128 Baker et al. Feb 2011 A1
20110032602 Rothenberg et al. Feb 2011 A1
20110032618 Handerek et al. Feb 2011 A1
20110032706 Mukawa Feb 2011 A1
20110063604 Hamre et al. Mar 2011 A1
20110102711 Sutherland et al. May 2011 A1
20110109880 Nummela May 2011 A1
20110187293 Travis et al. Aug 2011 A1
20110235179 Simmonds Sep 2011 A1
20110236803 Weiser et al. Sep 2011 A1
20110242661 Simmonds Oct 2011 A1
20110242670 Simmonds Oct 2011 A1
20110249309 McPheters et al. Oct 2011 A1
20110274435 Fini et al. Nov 2011 A1
20120033306 Valera et al. Feb 2012 A1
20120044572 Simmonds et al. Feb 2012 A1
20120044573 Simmonds et al. Feb 2012 A1
20120062850 Travis Mar 2012 A1
20120062998 Schultz et al. Mar 2012 A1
20120075168 Osterhout et al. Mar 2012 A1
20120081789 Mukawa et al. Apr 2012 A1
20120092632 McLeod et al. Apr 2012 A1
20120120493 Simmonds et al. May 2012 A1
20120162549 Gao et al. Jun 2012 A1
20120183888 Oliveira et al. Jul 2012 A1
20120194420 Osterhout et al. Aug 2012 A1
20120200532 Powell et al. Aug 2012 A1
20120206811 Mukawa et al. Aug 2012 A1
20120206937 Travis et al. Aug 2012 A1
20120207432 Travis et al. Aug 2012 A1
20120207434 Large Aug 2012 A1
20120214089 Hönel et al. Aug 2012 A1
20120214090 Weiser et al. Aug 2012 A1
20120235886 Border et al. Sep 2012 A1
20120290973 Robertson et al. Nov 2012 A1
20120300311 Simmonds et al. Nov 2012 A1
20130016324 Travis Jan 2013 A1
20130021392 Travis Jan 2013 A1
20130021586 Lippey Jan 2013 A1
20130033485 Kollin et al. Feb 2013 A1
20130039619 Laughlin Feb 2013 A1
20130044376 Valera et al. Feb 2013 A1
20130059233 Askham Mar 2013 A1
20130069850 Mukawa et al. Mar 2013 A1
20130077040 Escuti et al. Mar 2013 A1
20130077049 Bohn Mar 2013 A1
20130117377 Miller May 2013 A1
20130125027 Abovitz et al. May 2013 A1
20130128230 Macnamara May 2013 A1
20130143336 Jain Jun 2013 A1
20130163089 Bohn Jun 2013 A1
20130176704 Lanman et al. Jul 2013 A1
20130207887 Raffle et al. Aug 2013 A1
20130224634 Berneth et al. Aug 2013 A1
20130229717 Amitai Sep 2013 A1
20130250207 Bohn Sep 2013 A1
20130250430 Robbins et al. Sep 2013 A1
20130250431 Robbins et al. Sep 2013 A1
20130267309 Robbins et al. Oct 2013 A1
20130271731 Popovich et al. Oct 2013 A1
20130277890 Bowman et al. Oct 2013 A1
20130322810 Robbins Dec 2013 A1
20130342525 Benko et al. Dec 2013 A1
20140003762 Macnamara Jan 2014 A1
20140024159 Jain Jan 2014 A1
20140055845 Jain Feb 2014 A1
20140063055 Osterhout et al. Mar 2014 A1
20140064655 Nguyen et al. Mar 2014 A1
20140071538 Muller Mar 2014 A1
20140098010 Travis Apr 2014 A1
20140104665 Popovich et al. Apr 2014 A1
20140118647 Momonoi et al. May 2014 A1
20140130132 Cahill et al. May 2014 A1
20140140653 Brown et al. May 2014 A1
20140140654 Brown et al. May 2014 A1
20140146394 Tout et al. May 2014 A1
20140160576 Robbins et al. Jun 2014 A1
20140168735 Yuan et al. Jun 2014 A1
20140168783 Luebke et al. Jun 2014 A1
20140176528 Robbins Jun 2014 A1
20140177023 Gao et al. Jun 2014 A1
20140185286 Popovich et al. Jul 2014 A1
20140198128 Hong et al. Jul 2014 A1
20140204455 Popovich et al. Jul 2014 A1
20140211322 Bohn et al. Jul 2014 A1
20140218468 Gao et al. Aug 2014 A1
20140218801 Simmonds et al. Aug 2014 A1
20140232759 Simmonds et al. Aug 2014 A1
20140240834 Mason Aug 2014 A1
20140240842 Nguyen et al. Aug 2014 A1
20140267420 Schowengerdt et al. Sep 2014 A1
20140300947 Fattal et al. Oct 2014 A1
20140300960 Santori et al. Oct 2014 A1
20140300966 Travers et al. Oct 2014 A1
20140327970 Bohn et al. Nov 2014 A1
20140330159 Costa et al. Nov 2014 A1
20140367719 Jain Dec 2014 A1
20140375542 Robbins et al. Dec 2014 A1
20140375789 Lou et al. Dec 2014 A1
20140375790 Robbins et al. Dec 2014 A1
20150001677 Palumbo et al. Jan 2015 A1
20150003796 Bennett Jan 2015 A1
20150010265 Popovich et al. Jan 2015 A1
20150015946 Muller Jan 2015 A1
20150016777 Abovitz et al. Jan 2015 A1
20150035744 Robbins et al. Feb 2015 A1
20150036068 Fattal et al. Feb 2015 A1
20150058791 Robertson et al. Feb 2015 A1
20150062675 Ayres et al. Mar 2015 A1
20150062707 Simmonds et al. Mar 2015 A1
20150086163 Valera et al. Mar 2015 A1
20150125109 Robbins et al. May 2015 A1
20150148728 Sallum et al. May 2015 A1
20150185475 Saarikko et al. Jul 2015 A1
20150235447 Abovitz et al. Aug 2015 A1
20150235448 Schowengerdt et al. Aug 2015 A1
20150247975 Abovitz et al. Sep 2015 A1
20150260994 Akutsu et al. Sep 2015 A1
20150268415 Schowengerdt et al. Sep 2015 A1
20150277375 Large et al. Oct 2015 A1
20150288129 Jain Oct 2015 A1
20150346490 Tekolste et al. Dec 2015 A1
20150346495 Welch et al. Dec 2015 A1
20150355394 Leighton et al. Dec 2015 A1
20160003847 Ryan et al. Jan 2016 A1
20160004090 Popovich et al. Jan 2016 A1
20160026253 Bradski et al. Jan 2016 A1
20160033698 Escuti Feb 2016 A1
20160033705 Fattal Feb 2016 A1
20160033706 Fattal et al. Feb 2016 A1
20160038992 Arthur et al. Feb 2016 A1
20160041387 Valera et al. Feb 2016 A1
20160077338 Robbins et al. Mar 2016 A1
20160085300 Robbins et al. Mar 2016 A1
20160116739 TeKolste et al. Apr 2016 A1
20160124223 Shinbo et al. May 2016 A1
20160132025 Taff et al. May 2016 A1
20160195664 Fattal et al. Jul 2016 A1
20160209648 Haddick et al. Jul 2016 A1
20160231568 Saarikko et al. Aug 2016 A1
20160266398 Poon et al. Sep 2016 A1
20160274362 Tinch et al. Sep 2016 A1
20160299344 Dobschal et al. Oct 2016 A1
20160320536 Simmonds et al. Nov 2016 A1
20160327705 Simmonds et al. Nov 2016 A1
20160341964 Amitai Nov 2016 A1
20170003505 Vallius et al. Jan 2017 A1
20170010488 Klug et al. Jan 2017 A1
20170030550 Popovich et al. Feb 2017 A1
20170031171 Vallius et al. Feb 2017 A1
20170034435 Vallius Feb 2017 A1
20170038579 Yeoh et al. Feb 2017 A1
20170052376 Amitai et al. Feb 2017 A1
20170059759 Ayres et al. Mar 2017 A1
20170102543 Vallius Apr 2017 A1
20170115487 Travis et al. Apr 2017 A1
20170123208 Vallius May 2017 A1
20170131460 Lin et al. May 2017 A1
20170131545 Wall May 2017 A1
20170131546 Woltman et al. May 2017 A1
20170131551 Robbins et al. May 2017 A1
20170180404 Bersch et al. Jun 2017 A1
20170180408 Yu et al. Jun 2017 A1
20170219841 Popovich et al. Aug 2017 A1
20170276940 Popovich et al. Sep 2017 A1
20170299860 Wall et al. Oct 2017 A1
20180011324 Popovich et al. Jan 2018 A1
20180059305 Popovich et al. Mar 2018 A1
20180246354 Popovich et al. Aug 2018 A1
20190285796 Waldern et al. Sep 2019 A1
20200247016 Calafiore Aug 2020 A1
20200249568 Rao et al. Aug 2020 A1
20200319404 Waldern et al. Oct 2020 A1
20210109285 Jiang et al. Apr 2021 A1
20210191122 Yaroshchuk et al. Jun 2021 A1
20210199873 Shi et al. Jul 2021 A1
20210199971 Lee et al. Jul 2021 A1
20210238374 Ye et al. Aug 2021 A1
20220019015 Calafiore et al. Jan 2022 A1
20220082739 Franke et al. Mar 2022 A1
20220091323 Yaroshchuk et al. Mar 2022 A1
20220204790 Zhang et al. Jun 2022 A1
20220206232 Zhang et al. Jun 2022 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (207)
Number Date Country
PI 0720469 Jan 2014 BR
2889727 Jun 2014 CA
101103297 Jan 2008 CN
100492099 May 2009 CN
104204901 Dec 2014 CN
104956252 Sep 2015 CN
105074537 Nov 2015 CN
105074539 Nov 2015 CN
105190407 Dec 2015 CN
105229514 Jan 2016 CN
105393159 Mar 2016 CN
105408801 Mar 2016 CN
105408802 Mar 2016 CN
105408803 Mar 2016 CN
105531716 Apr 2016 CN
105705981 Jun 2016 CN
112088332 Dec 2020 CN
19751190 May 1999 DE
102012108424 Mar 2014 DE
0795775 Sep 1997 EP
1413972 Apr 2004 EP
1526709 Apr 2005 EP
1748305 Jan 2007 EP
1952189 Aug 2008 EP
1413972 Oct 2008 EP
2110701 Oct 2009 EP
2244114 Oct 2010 EP
2326983 Jun 2011 EP
1828832 May 2013 EP
2733517 May 2014 EP
1573369 Jul 2014 EP
2929378 Oct 2015 EP
2748670 Nov 2015 EP
2995986 Mar 2016 EP
3765897 Jan 2021 EP
2140935 Dec 1984 GB
2508661 Jun 2014 GB
2509536 Jul 2014 GB
2512077 Sep 2014 GB
2514658 Dec 2014 GB
1204684 Nov 2015 HK
1205563 Dec 2015 HK
1205793 Dec 2015 HK
1206101 Dec 2015 HK
02186319 Jul 1990 JP
03239384 Oct 1991 JP
06294952 Oct 1994 JP
07098439 Apr 1995 JP
0990312 Apr 1997 JP
H09218407 Aug 1997 JP
11109320 Apr 1999 JP
11142806 May 1999 JP
2953444 Sep 1999 JP
2000056259 Feb 2000 JP
2000267042 Sep 2000 JP
2001027739 Jan 2001 JP
2001296503 Oct 2001 JP
2002090858 Mar 2002 JP
2002122906 Apr 2002 JP
2002162598 Jun 2002 JP
2002523802 Jul 2002 JP
2003066428 Mar 2003 JP
2003270419 Sep 2003 JP
2008112187 May 2008 JP
2009036955 Feb 2009 JP
2009516862 Apr 2009 JP
2009211091 Sep 2009 JP
4367775 Nov 2009 JP
2010525394 Jul 2010 JP
2012137616 Jul 2012 JP
5303928 Oct 2013 JP
2015099238 May 2015 JP
2021515917 Jun 2021 JP
20100092059 Aug 2010 KR
20140140063 Dec 2014 KR
20140142337 Dec 2014 KR
10-2020-0133265 Nov 2020 KR
200535633 Nov 2005 TW
200801583 Jan 2008 TW
201314263 Apr 2013 TW
201600943 Jan 2016 TW
201604601 Feb 2016 TW
1997001133 Jan 1997 WO
1997027519 Jul 1997 WO
1998004650 Feb 1998 WO
1999009440 Feb 1999 WO
2000016136 Mar 2000 WO
2000023830 Apr 2000 WO
2000023847 Apr 2000 WO
2001050200 Jul 2001 WO
2001090822 Nov 2001 WO
2002082168 Oct 2002 WO
2003081320 Oct 2003 WO
2005001753 Jan 2005 WO
2005006065 Jan 2005 WO
2005006065 Feb 2005 WO
2005073798 Aug 2005 WO
2006002870 Jan 2006 WO
2006064301 Jun 2006 WO
2006064325 Jun 2006 WO
2006064334 Jun 2006 WO
2006102073 Sep 2006 WO
2006132614 Dec 2006 WO
2006102073 Jan 2007 WO
2007015141 Feb 2007 WO
2007029032 Mar 2007 WO
2007062098 May 2007 WO
2007085682 Aug 2007 WO
2007062098 Nov 2007 WO
2007130130 Nov 2007 WO
2007141587 Dec 2007 WO
2007141589 Dec 2007 WO
2008011066 Jan 2008 WO
2008011066 May 2008 WO
2008100545 Aug 2008 WO
2008011066 Dec 2008 WO
2009013597 Jan 2009 WO
2009077802 Jun 2009 WO
2009077803 Jun 2009 WO
2009101238 Aug 2009 WO
2009155437 Dec 2009 WO
2009155437 Mar 2010 WO
2010023444 Mar 2010 WO
2010057219 May 2010 WO
2010067114 Jun 2010 WO
2010078856 Jul 2010 WO
2010104692 Sep 2010 WO
2010122330 Oct 2010 WO
2010125337 Nov 2010 WO
2011032005 Mar 2011 WO
2011042711 Apr 2011 WO
2011051660 May 2011 WO
2011055109 May 2011 WO
2011073673 Jun 2011 WO
2011107831 Sep 2011 WO
2011110821 Sep 2011 WO
2011131978 Oct 2011 WO
2012052352 Apr 2012 WO
2012062658 May 2012 WO
2012158950 Nov 2012 WO
2012172295 Dec 2012 WO
2013027004 Feb 2013 WO
2013027006 Feb 2013 WO
2013034879 Mar 2013 WO
2013049012 Apr 2013 WO
2013102759 Jul 2013 WO
2013167864 Nov 2013 WO
2014064427 May 2014 WO
2014080155 May 2014 WO
2014085734 Jun 2014 WO
2014090379 Jun 2014 WO
2014091200 Jun 2014 WO
2014093601 Jun 2014 WO
2014100182 Jun 2014 WO
2014113506 Jul 2014 WO
2014116615 Jul 2014 WO
2014130383 Aug 2014 WO
2014144526 Sep 2014 WO
2014159621 Oct 2014 WO
2014164901 Oct 2014 WO
2014176695 Nov 2014 WO
2014179632 Nov 2014 WO
2014188149 Nov 2014 WO
2014209733 Dec 2014 WO
2014209819 Dec 2014 WO
2014209820 Dec 2014 WO
2014209821 Dec 2014 WO
2014210349 Dec 2014 WO
2015006784 Jan 2015 WO
2015017291 Feb 2015 WO
2015069553 May 2015 WO
2015081313 Jun 2015 WO
2015117039 Aug 2015 WO
2015145119 Oct 2015 WO
2016010289 Jan 2016 WO
2016020643 Feb 2016 WO
2016025350 Feb 2016 WO
2016046514 Mar 2016 WO
2016103263 Jun 2016 WO
2016111706 Jul 2016 WO
2016111707 Jul 2016 WO
2016111708 Jul 2016 WO
2016111709 Jul 2016 WO
2016113534 Jul 2016 WO
2016118107 Jul 2016 WO
2016122679 Aug 2016 WO
2016181108 Nov 2016 WO
2017060665 Apr 2017 WO
2017162999 Sep 2017 WO
2017180403 Oct 2017 WO
2017182771 Oct 2017 WO
2017203200 Nov 2017 WO
2017203201 Nov 2017 WO
2017207987 Dec 2017 WO
2018102834 Jun 2018 WO
2018102834 Jun 2018 WO
2018096359 Jul 2018 WO
2017162999 Aug 2018 WO
2018150163 Aug 2018 WO
2019077307 Apr 2019 WO
2019122806 Jun 2019 WO
2019171038 Sep 2019 WO
2019178614 Sep 2019 WO
2020212682 Oct 2020 WO
2021032982 Feb 2021 WO
2021032983 Feb 2021 WO
2021044121 Mar 2021 WO
Non-Patent Literature Citations (318)
Entry
International Preliminary Report on Patentability for International Application PCT/GB2009/051676, dated Jun. 14, 2011, dated Jun. 23, 2011, 6 pgs.
International Preliminary Report on Patentability for International Application PCT/GB2011/000349, dated Sep. 18, 2012, dated Sep. 27, 2012, 10 pgs.
International Preliminary Report on Patentability for International Application PCT/GB2012/000331, dated Oct. 8, 2013, dated Oct. 17, 2013, 8 pgs.
International Preliminary Report on Patentability for International Application PCT/GB2012/000677, dated Feb. 25, 2014, dated Mar. 6, 2014, 5 pgs.
International Preliminary Report on Patentability for International Application PCT/GB2013/000005, dated Jul. 8, 2014, dated Jul. 17, 2014, 12 pgs.
International Preliminary Report on Patentability for International Application PCT/GB2014/000295, dated Feb. 2, 2016, dated Feb. 11, 2016, 4 pgs.
International Preliminary Report on Patentability for International Application PCT/GB2015/000225, dated Feb. 14, 2017, dated Feb. 23, 2017, 8 pgs.
International Preliminary Report on Patentability for International Application PCT/GB2015/000274, dated Mar. 28, 2017, dated Apr. 6, 2017, 8 pgs.
International Preliminary Report on Patentability for International Application PCT/GB2016/000014, dated Jul. 25, 2017, dated Aug. 3, 2017, 7 pgs.
International Preliminary Report on Patentability for International Application PCT/US2014/011736, dated Jul. 21, 2015, dated Jul. 30, 2015, 9 pgs.
International Preliminary Report on Patentability for International Application PCT/US2016/017091, dated Aug. 15, 2017, dated Aug. 24, 2017, 5 pgs.
International Preliminary Report on Patentability for International Application PCT/US2019/022822, Report dated Sep. 22, 2020, dated Oct. 1, 2020, 7 Pgs.
International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/US2014/011736, completed Apr. 18, 2014, dated May 8, 2014, 10 pgs.
International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/US2019/022822, Search completed May 15, 2019, dated May 29, 2019, 11 Pgs.
International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application PCT/GB2009/051676, completed May 10, 2010, dated May 18, 2010, 7 pgs.
International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application PCT/US2016/017091, completed by the European Patent Office on Apr. 20, 2016, 7 pgs.
International Search Report for International Application No. PCT/GB2014/000295, completed Nov. 18, 2014, dated Jan. 5, 2015, 4 pgs.
International Search Report for International Application PCT/GB2017/000040, dated Jul. 18, 2017, completed Jul. 10, 2017, 3 pgs.
International Search Report for PCT/GB2011/000349, completed by the European Patent Office on Aug. 17, 2011, 4 pgs.
International Search Report for PCT/GB2012/000331, completed by the European Patent Office on Aug. 29, 2012, 4 pgs.
International Search Report for PCT/GB2012/000677, completed by the European Patent Office on Dec. 10, 2012, 4 pgs.
International Search Report for PCT/GB2013/000005, completed by the European Patent Office on Jul. 16, 2013, 3 pgs.
International Search Report for PCT/GB2015/000203, completed by the European Patent Office on Oct. 9, 2015, 4 pgs.
International Search Report for PCT/GB2015/000225, completed by the European Patent Office on Nov. 10, 2015, dated Dec. 2, 2016, 5 pgs.
International Search Report for PCT/GB2015/000274, completed by the European Patent Office on Jan. 7, 2016, 4 pgs.
International Search Report for PCT/GB2016/000014, completed by the European Patent Office on Jun. 27, 2016, 4 pgs.
Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/GB2011/000349, completed Aug. 17, 2011, dated Aug. 25, 2011, 9 pgs.
Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/GB2012/000331, completed Aug. 29, 2012, dated Sep. 6, 2012, 7 pgs.
Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/GB2012/000677, completed Dec. 10, 2012, dated Dec. 17, 2012, 4 pgs.
Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/GB2013/000005, search completed Jul. 16, 2013, dated Jul. 24, 2013, 11 pgs.
Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/GB2014/000295, search completed Nov. 18, 2014, dated Jan. 5, 2015, 3 pgs.
Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/GB2015/000225, search completed Nov. 10, 2015, dated Feb. 4, 2016, 7 pgs.
Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/GB2015/000274, search completed Jan. 7, 2016, dated Jan. 19, 2016, 7 pgs.
Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/GB2016/000014, search completed Jun. 27, 2016, dated Jul. 7, 2016, 6 pgs.
Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/GB2017/000040, search completed Jul. 10, 2017, dated Jul. 18, 2017, 6 pgs.
“Agilent ADNS-2051 Optical Mouse Sensor: Data Sheet”, Agilent Technologies, Jan. 9, 2002, 40 pgs.
“Application Note—MOXTEK ProFlux Polarizer use with LCOS displays”, CRL Opto Limited, http://www.crlopto.com, 2003, 6 pgs.
“Application Note AN16: Optical Considerations for Bridgelux LED Arrays”, BridgeLux, Jul. 31, 2010, 23 pgs.
“Application Note: Variable Attenuator for Lasers”, Technology and Applications Center, Newport Corporation, www.newport.com, 2006, DS-08067, 6 pgs.
“Bae Systems to Unveil Q-Sight Family of Helmet-Mounted Display at AUSA Symposium”, Released on Tuesday, Oct. 9, 2007, 1 pg.
“Beam Steering Using Liquid Crystals”, Boulder Nonlinear Systems, Inc., info@bnonlinear.com, May 8, 2001, 4 pgs.
“BragGrate—Deflector: Transmitting Volume Bragg Grating for angular selection and magnification”, 2015, www.OptiGrate.com.
“Cree XLamp XP-E LEDs”, Cree, Inc., Retrieved from www.cree.com/Xlamp, CLD-DS18 Rev 17, 2013, 17 pgs.
“Desmodur N 3900”, Bayer MaterialScience AG, Mar. 18, 2013, www.bayercoatings.com, 4 pgs.
“Digilens—Innovative Augmented Reality Display and Sensor Solutions for OEMs”, Jun. 6, 2017, 31 pgs.
“Exotic Optical Components”, Building Electro-Optical Systems, Making It All Work, Chapter 7, John Wiley & Sons, Inc., pp. 233-261.
“FHS Lenses Series”, Fraen Corporation, www.fraen.com, Jun. 16, 2003, 10 pgs.
“FLP Lens Series for LUXEONTM Rebel and Rebel ES LEDs”, Fraen Corporation, www.fraensrl.com, Aug. 7, 2015, 8 pgs.
“Head-up Displays, See-through display for military aviation”, BAE Systems, 2016, 3 pgs.
“Holder for LUXEON Rebel—Part No. 180”, Polymer Optics Ltd., 2008, 12 pgs.
“LED 7-Segment Displays”, Lumex, uk.digikey.com, 2003, UK031, 36 pgs.
“LED325W UVTOP UV LED with Window”, Thorlabs, Specifications and Documentation, 21978-S01 Rev. A, Apr. 8, 2011, 5 pgs.
“Liquid Crystal Phases”, Phases of Liquid Crystals, http://plc.cwru.edu/tutorial/enhanced/files/lc/phase, Retrieved on Sep. 21, 2004, 6 pgs.
“LiteHUD Head-up display”, BAE Systems, 2016, 2 pgs.
“LiteHUD Head-up display infographic”, BAE Systems, 2017, 2 pgs.
“Luxeon C: Power Light Source”, Philips Lumileds, www.philipslumileds.com, 2012, 18 pgs.
“Luxeon Rebel ES: Leading efficacy and light output, maximum design flexibility”, LUXEON Rebel ES Datasheet DS61 20130221, www.philipslumileds.com, 2013, 33 pgs.
“Mobile Display Report”, Insight Media, LLC, Apr. 2012, vol. 7, No. 4, 72 pgs.
“Molecular Imprints Imprio 55”, Engineering at Illinois, Micro + Nanotechnology Lab, Retrieved from https://mntl.illinois.edu/facilities/cleanrooms/equipment/Nano-Imprint.asp, Dec. 28, 2015, 2 pgs.
“Optical measurements of retinal flow”, Industrial Research Limited, Feb. 2012, 18 pgs.
“Osterhout Design Group Develops Next-Generation, Fully-integrated Smart Glasses Using Qualcomm Technologies”, ODG, www.osterhoutgroup.com, Sep. 18, 2014, 2 pgs.
“Range Finding Using Pulse Lasers”, OSRAM, Opto Semiconductors, Sep. 10, 2004, 7 pgs.
“Response time in Liquid-Crystal Variable Retarders”, Meadowlark Optics, Inc., 2005, 4 pgs.
“Secondary Optics Design Considerations for SuperFlux LEDs”, Lumileds, application brief AB20-5, Sep. 2002, 23 pgs.
“Solid-State Optical Mouse Sensor with Quadrature Outputs”, IC Datasheet, UniqueICs, Jul. 15, 2004, 11 pgs.
“SVGA TransparentVLSITM Microdisplay Evaluation Kit”, Radiant Images, Inc., Product Data Sheet, 2003, 3 pgs.
“Technical Data Sheet LPR1”, Luminus Devices, Inc., Luminus Projection Chipset, Release 1, Preliminary, Revision B, Sep. 21, 2004, 9 pgs.
“The Next Generation of TV”, SID Information Display, Nov./Dec. 2014, vol. 30, No. 6, 56 pgs.
“Thermal Management Considerations for SuperFlux LEDs”, Lumileds, application brief AB20-4, Sep. 2002, 14 pgs.
“UVTOP240”, Roithner LaserTechnik GmbH, v 2.0, Jun. 24, 2013, 6 pgs.
“UVTOP310”, Roithner LaserTechnik GmbH, v 2.0, Jun. 24, 2013, 6 pgs.
“Velodyne's HDL-64E: A High Definition Lidar Sensor for 3-D Applications”, High Definition Lidar, white paper, Oct. 2007, 7 pgs.
“VerLASE Gets Patent for Breakthrough Color Conversion Technology That Enables Full Color MicroLED Arrays for Near Eye Displays”, Cision PRweb, Apr. 28, 2015, Retrieved from the Internet http://www.prweb.com/releases/2015/04/prweb12681038.htm, 3 pgs.
“X-Cubes—Revisited for LCOS”, BASID, RAF Electronics Corp. Rawson Optics, Inc., Oct. 24, 2002, 16 pgs.
Aachen, “Design of plastic optics for LED applications”, Optics Colloquium 2009, Mar. 19, 2009, 30 pgs.
Abbate et al., “Characterization of LC-polymer composites for opto-electronic application”, Proceedings of OPTOEL'03, Leganes-Madrid, Spain, Jul. 14-16, 2003, 4 pgs.
Al-Kalbani et al., “Ocular Microtremor laser speckle metrology”, Proc. of SPIE, 2009, vol. 7176 717606-1, 12 pgs., doi:10.1117/12.808855.
Almanza-Workman et al., “Planarization coating for polyimide substrates used in roll-to-roll fabrication of active matrix backplanes for flexible displays”, HP Laboratories, HPL-2012-23, Feb. 6, 2012, 12 pgs.
Amundson et al., “Morphology and electro-optic properties of polymer-dispersed liquid-crystal films”, Physical Review E, Feb. 1997, vol. 55. No. 2, pp. 1646-1654.
An et al., “Speckle suppression in laser display using several partially coherent beams”, Optics Express, Jan. 5, 2009, vol. 17, No. 1, pp. 92-103, first published Dec. 22, 2008.
Apter et al., “Electrooptical Wide-Angle Beam Deflector Based on Fringing-Field-Induced Refractive Inhomogeneity in a Liquid Crystal Layer”, 23rd IEEE Convention of Electrical and Electronics Engineers in Israel, Sep. 6-7, 2004, pp. 240-243.
Arnold et al., “52.3: An Improved Polarizing Beamsplitter LCOS Projection Display Based on Wire-Grid Polarizers”, Society for Information Display, Jun. 2001, pp. 1282-1285.
Ayras et al., “Exit pupil expander with a large field of view based on diffractive optics”, Journal of the Society for Information Display, May 18, 2009, vol. 17, No. 8, pp. 659-664, DOI: 10.1889/JSID17.8.659.
Baets et al., “Resonant-Cavity Light-Emitting Diodes: a review”, Proceedings of SPIE, 2003, vol. 4996, pp. 74-86.
Bayer et al., “Introduction to Helmet-Mounted Displays”, 2016, pp. 47-108.
Beckel et al., “Electro-optic properties of thiol-ene polymer stabilized ferroelectric liquid crystals”, Liquid Crystals, vol. 30, No. 11, Nov. 2003, pp. 1343-1350, DOI: 10.1080/02678290310001605910.
Bergkvist, “Biospeckle-based Study of the Line Profile of Light Scattered in Strawberries”, Master Thesis, Lund Reports on Atomic Physics, LRAP-220, Lund 1997, pp. 1-62.
Bernards et al., “Nanoscale porosity in polymer films: fabrication and therapeutic applications”, Soft Matter, Jan. 1, 2010, vol. 6, No. 8, pp. 1621-1631, doi:10.1039/B922303G.
Bleha et al., “Binocular Holographic Waveguide Visor Display”, SID Symposium Digest of Technical Papers, Holoeye Systems Inc., Jun. 2014, San Diego, CA, 4 pgs.
Bleha et al., “D-ILA Technology for High Resolution Projection Displays”, Sep. 10, 2003, Proceedings, vol. 5080, 11 pgs., doi:10.1117/12.497532.
Bone, “Design Obstacles for LCOS Displays in Projection Applications “Optics architectures for LCOS are still evolving””, Aurora Systems Inc., Bay Area SID Seminar, Mar. 27, 2001, 22 pgs.
Born et al., “Optics of Crystals”, Principles of Optics 5th Edition 1975, pp. 705-707.
Bourzac, “Magic Leap Needs to Engineer a Miracle”, Intelligent Machines, Jun. 11, 2015, 7 pgs.
Bowen et al., “Optimisation of interdigitated electrodes for piezoelectric actuators and active fibre composites”, J Electroceram, Jul. 2006, vol. 16, pp. 263-269, DOI 10.1007/s10832-006-9862-8.
Bowley et al., “Variable-wavelength switchable Bragg gratings formed in polymer-dispersed liquid crystals”, Applied Physics Letters, Jul. 2, 2001, vol. 79, No. 1, pp. 9-11, DOI: 10.1063/1.1383566.
Bronnikov et al., “Polymer-Dispersed Liquid Crystals: Progress in Preparation, Investigation and Application”, Journal of Macromolecular Science Part B, published online Sep. 30, 2013, vol. 52, pp. 1718-1738, DOI: 10.1080/00222348.2013.808926.
Brown, “Waveguide Displays”, Rockwell Collins, 2015, 11 pgs.
Bruzzone et al., “Compact, high-brightness LED illumination for projection systems”, Journal of the Society for Information Display, vol. 17, No. 12, Dec. 2009, pp. 1043-1049, DOI: 10.1189/JSID17.12.1043.
Buckley, “Colour holographic laser projection technology for heads-up and instrument cluster displays”, Conference: Proc. SID Conference 14th Annual Symposium on Vehicle Displays, Jan. 2007, 5 pgs.
Buckley, “Pixtronix DMS technology for head-up displays”, Pixtronix, Inc., Jan. 2011, 4 pgs.
Buckley et al., “Full colour holographic laser projector HUD”, Light Blue Optics Ltd., Aug. 10, 2015, 5 pgs.
Buckley et al., “Rear-view virtual image displays”, in Proc. SID Conference 16th Annual Symposium on Vehicle Displays, Jan. 2009, 5 pgs.
Bunning et al., “Effect of gel-point versus conversion on the real-time dynamics of holographic polymer-dispersed liquid crystal (HPDLC) formation”, Proceedings of SPIE—vol. 5213, Liquid Crystals VII, Iam-Choon Khoo, Editor, Dec. 2003, pp. 123-129.
Bunning et al., “Electro-optical photonic crystals formed in H-PDLCs by thiol-ene photopolymerization”, American Physical Society, Annual APS, Mar. 3-7, 2003, abstract #R 1.135.
Bunning et al., “Holographic Polymer-Dispersed Liquid Crystals (H-PDLCs)1”, Annual Review of Material Science, 2000, vol. 30, pp. 83-115.
Bunning et al., “Morphology of Anisotropic Polymer Dispersed Liquid Crystals and the Effect of Monomer Functionality”, Journal of Polymer Science Part B: Polymer Physics, Jul. 30, 1997, vol. 35, pp. 2825-2833.
Busbee et al., “SiO2 Nanoparticle Sequestration via Reactive Functionalization in Holographic Polymer-Dispersed Liquid Crystals”, Advanced Materials, Sep. 2009, vol. 21, pp. 3659-3662, DOI: 10.1002/adma.200900298.
Butler et al., “Diffractive Properties of Highly Birefringent Volume Gratings: Investigation”, Journal of Optical Society of America, Feb. 2002, vol. 19, No. 2, pp. 183-189.
Cai et al., “Recent advances in antireflective surfaces based on nanostructure arrays”, Materials Horizons, 2015, vol. 2, pp. 37-53, DOI: 10.1038/c4mh00140k.
Cameron, “Optical Waveguide Technology & Its Application In Head Mounted Displays”, Proc. of SPIE, May 22, 2012, vol. 8383, pp. 83830E-1-83830E-11, doi: 10.1117/12.923660.
Caputo et al., “POLICRYPS Composite Materials: Features and Applications”, Advances in Composite Materials—Analysis of Natural and Man-Made Materials, www.intechopen.com, Sep. 2011, pp. 93-118.
Caputo et al., “POLICRYPS Switchable Holographic Grating: A Promising Grating Electro-Optical Pixel for High Resolution Display Application”, Journal of Display Technology, Mar. 2006, vol. 2, No. 1, pp. 38-51, Doi: 10.1109/JDT.2005.864156.
Carclo Optics, “Guide to choosing secondary optics”, Carclo Optics, Dec. 15, 2014, www.carclo-optics.com, 48 pgs.
Chen et al, “Polarization rotators fabricated by thermally-switched liquid crystal alignments based on rubbed poly(N-vinyl carbazole) films”, Optics Express, Apr. 11, 2011, vol. 19, No. 8, pp. 7553-7558, first published Apr. 5, 2011.
Cheng et al., “Design of an ultra-thin near-eye display with geometrical waveguide and freeform optics”, Optics Express, Aug. 2014, 16 pgs., DOI: 10.1364/OE.22.020705.
Chi et al., “Ultralow-refractive-index optical thin films through nanoscale etching of ordered mesoporous silica films”, Optic Letters, May 1, 2012, vol. 37, No. 9, pp. 1406-1408, first published Apr. 19, 2012.
Chigrinov et al., “Photo-aligning by azo-dyes: Physics and applications”, Liquid Crystals Today, Sep. 6, 2006, http://www.tandfonline.com/action/journalInformation?journalCode=tlcy20, 15 pgs.
Cho et al., “Electro-optic Properties of CO2 Fixed Polymer/Nematic LC Composite Films”, Journal of Applied Polymer Science, Nov. 5, 2000, vol. 81, Issue 11, pp. 2744-2753.
Cho et al., “Optimization of Holographic Polymer Dispersed Liquid Crystals for Ternary Monomers”, Polymer International, Nov. 1999, vol. 48, pp. 1085-1090.
Colegrove et al., “P-59: Technology of Stacking HPDLC for Higher Reflectance”, SID 00 Digest, May 2000, pp. 770-773.
Cruz-Arreola et al., “Diffraction of beams by infinite or finite amplitude-phase gratings”, Investigacio' N Revista Mexicana De Fi'Sica, Feb. 2011, vol. 57, No. 1, pp. 6-16.
Dainty, “Some statistical properties of random speckle patterns in coherent and partially coherent illumination”, Optica Acta, Mar. 12, 1970, vol. 17, No. 10, pp. 761-772.
Date, “Alignment Control in Holographic Polymer Dispersed Liquid Crystal”, Journal of Photopolymer Science and Technology, Nov. 2, 2000, vol. 13, No. 2, pp. 289-294.
Date et al., “52.3: Direct-viewing Display Using Alignment-controlled PDLC and Holographic PDLC”, Society for Information Display Digest, May 2000, pp. 1184-1187, DOI: 10.1889/1.1832877.
Date et al., “Full-color reflective display device using holographically fabricated polymer-dispersed liquid crystal (HPDLC)”, Journal of the SID, 1999, vol. 7, No. 1, pp. 17-22.
De Bitetto, “White light viewing of surface holograms by simple dispersion compensation”, Applied Physics Letters, Dec. 15, 1966, vol. 9, No. 12, pp. 417-418.
Developer World, “Create customized augmented reality solutions”, printed Oct. 19, 2017, LMX-001 holographic waveguide display, Sony Developer World, 3 pgs.
Dhar et al., “Recording media that exhibit high dynamic range for digital holographic data storage”, Optics Letters, Apr. 1, 1999, vol. 24, No. 7, pp. 487-489.
Domash et al., “Applications of switchable Polaroid holograms”, SPIE Proceedings, vol. 2152, Diffractive and Holographic Optics Technology, Jan. 23-29, 1994, Los Angeles, CA, pp. 127-138, ISBN: 0-8194-1447-6.
Drake et al., “Waveguide Hologram Fingerprint Entry Device”, Optical Engineering, Sep. 1996, vol. 35, No. 9, pp. 2499-2505.
Drevensek-Olenik et al., “In-Plane Switching of Holographic Polymer-Dispersed Liquid Crystal Transmission Gratings”, Mol. Cryst. Liq. Cryst., 2008, vol. 495, pp. 177/[529]-185/[537], DOI: 10.1080/15421400802432584.
Drevensek-Olenik et al., “Optical diffraction gratings from polymer-dispersed liquid crystals switched by interdigitated electrodes”, Journal of Applied Physics, Dec. 1, 2004, vol. 96, No. 11, pp. 6207-6212, DOI: 10.1063/1.1807027.
Ducharme, “Microlens diffusers for efficient laser speckle generation”, Optics Express, Oct. 29, 2007, vol. 15, No. 22, pp. 14573-14579.
Duong et al., “Centrifugal Deposition of Iron Oxide Magnetic Nanorods for Hyperthermia Application”, Journal of Thermal Engineering, Yildiz Technical University Press, Istanbul, Turkey, Apr. 2015, vol. 1, No. 2, pp. 99-103.
Fattal et al., “A multi directional backlight for a wide-angle glasses-free three-dimensional display”, Nature, Mar. 21, 2012, vol. 495, pp. 348-351.
Fontecchio et al., “Spatially Pixelated Reflective Arrays from Holographic Polymer Dispersed Liquid Crystals”, SID 00 Digest, May 2000, pp. 774-776.
Forman et al., “Materials development for PhotoInhibited SuperResolution (PINSR) lithography”, Proc. of SPIE, 2012, vol. 8249, 824904, doi: 10.1117/12.908512, pp. 824904-1-824904-9.
Forman et al., “Radical diffusion limits to photoinhibited superresolution lithography”, Phys.Chem. Chem. Phys., May 31, 2013, vol. 15, pp. 14862-14867.
Friedrich-Schiller, “Spatial Noise and Speckle”, Version 1.12.2011, Dec. 2011, Abbe School of Photonics, Jena, Germany, 27 pgs.
Fujii et al., “Nanoparticle-polymer-composite volume gratings incorporating chain-transfer agents for holography and slow-neutron optics”, Optics Letters, Apr. 25, 2014, vol. 39, Issue 12, 5 pgs.
Funayama et al., “Proposal of a new type thin film light-waveguide display device using”, The International Conference on Electrical Engineering, 2008, No. P-044, 5 pgs.
Gabor, “Laser Speckle and its Elimination”, BM Research and Development, Eliminating Speckle Noise, Sep. 1970, vol. 14, No. 5, pp. 509-514.
Gardiner et al., “Bistable liquid-crystals reduce power consumption for high-efficiency smart glazing”, SPIE, 2009, 10.1117/2.1200904.1596, 2 pgs.
Giancola, “Holographic Diffuser, Makes Light Work of Screen Tests”, Photonics Spectra, 1996, vol. 30, No. 8, pp. 121-122.
Goodman, “Some fundamental properties of speckle”, J. Opt. Soc. Am., Nov. 1976, vol. 66, No. 11, pp. 1145-1150.
Goodman, “Statistical Properties of Laser Speckle Patterns”, Applied Physics, 1975, vol. 9, Chapter 2, Laser Speckle and Related Phenomena, pp. 9-75.
Goodman et al., “Speckle Reduction by a Moving Diffuser in Laser Projection Displays”, The Optical Society of America, 2000, 15 pgs.
Guldin et al., “Self-Cleaning Antireflective Optical Coatings”, Nano Letters, Oct. 14, 2013, vol. 13, pp. 5329-5335.
Guo et al., “Review Article: A Review of the Optimisation of Photopolymer Materials for Holographic Data Storage”, Physics Research International, vol. 2012, Article ID 803439, Academic Editor: Sergi Gallego, 16 pages, http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2012/803439, May 4, 2012.
Han et al., “Study of Holographic Waveguide Display System”, Advanced Photonics for Communications, 2014, 4 pgs.
Harbers et al., “I-15.3: LED Backlighting for LCD-HDTV”, Journal of the Society for Information Display, 2002, vol. 10, No. 4, pp. 347-350.
Harbers et al., “Performance of High Power LED Illuminators in Color Sequential Projection Displays”, Lumileds Lighting, 2007, 4 pgs.
Harbers et al., “Performance of High Power LED Illuminators in Color Sequential Projection Displays”, Lumileds, Aug. 7, 2001, 11 pgs.
Harbers et al., “Performance of High-Power LED illuminators in Projection Displays”, Proc. Int. Disp. Workshops, Japan. vol. 10, pp. 1585-1588, 2003.
Harding et al., “Reactive Liquid Crystal Materials for Optically Anisotropic Patterned Retarders”, Merck, licrivue, 2008, ME-GR-RH-08-010, 20 pgs.
Harding et al., “Reactive Liquid Crystal Materials for Optically Anisotropic Patterned Retarders”, SPIE Lithography Asia—Taiwan, 2008, Proceedings vol. 7140, Lithography Asia 2008; 71402J, doi: 10.1117/12.805378.
Hariharan, “Optical Holography: Principles, techniques and applications”, Cambridge University Press, 1996, pp. 231-233.
Harris, “Photonic Devices”, EE 216 Principals and Models of Semiconductor Devices, Autumn 2002, 20 pgs.
Harrold et al., “3D Display Systems Hardware Research at Sharp Laboratories of Europe: an update”, Sharp Laboratories of Europe, Ltd., received May 21, 1999, 7 pgs.
Harthong et al., “Speckle phase averaging in high-resolution color holography”, J. Opt. Soc. Am. A, Feb. 1997, vol. 14, No. 2, pp. 405-409.
Hasan et al., “Tunable-focus lens for adaptive eyeglasses”, Optics Express, Jan. 23, 2017, vol. 25, No. 2, 1221, 13 pgs.
Hasman et al., “Diffractive Optics: Design, Realization, and Applications”, Fiber and Integrated Optics, vol. 16, pp. 1-25, 1997.
Hata et al., “Holographic nanoparticle-polymer composites based on step-growth thiol-ene photopolymerization”, Optical Materials Express, Jun. 1, 2011, vol. 1, No. 2, pp. 207-222.
He et al., “Dynamics of peristrophic multiplexing in holographic polymer-dispersed liquid crystal”, Liquid Crystals, Mar. 26, 2014, vol. 41, No. 5, pp. 673-684.
He et al., “Holographic 3D display based on polymer-dispersed liquid-crystal thin films”, Proceedings of China Display/Asia Display 2011, pp. 158-160.
He et al., “Properties of Volume Holograms Recording in Photopolymer Films with Various Pulse Exposures Repetition Frequencies”, Proceedings of SPIE vol. 5636, Bellingham, WA, 2005, doi: 10.1117/12.580978, pp. 842-848.
Herman et al., “Production and Uses of Diffractionless Beams”, J. Opt. Soc. Am. A., Jun. 1991, vol. 8, No. 6, pp. 932-942.
Hisano, “Alignment layer-free molecular ordering induced by masked photopolymerization with nonpolarized light”, Appl. Phys. Express 9, Jun. 6, 2016, pp. 072601-1-072601-4.
Hoepfner et al., “LED Front Projection Goes Mainstream”, Luminus Devices, Inc., Projection Summit, 2008, 18 pgs.
Holmes et al., “Controlling the Anisotropy of Holographic Polymer-Dispersed Liquid-Crystal Gratings”, Physical Review E, Jun. 11, 2002, vol. 65, 066603-1-066603-4.
Hoyle et al., “Advances in the Polymerization of Thiol-Ene Formulations”, Heraeus Noblelight Fusion UV Inc., 2003 Conference, 6 pgs.
Hua, “Sunglass-like displays become a reality with free-form optical technology”, Illumination & Displays 3D Visualization and Imaging Systems Laboratory (3DVIS) College of Optical Sciences University of Arizona Tucson, AZ. 2014, 3 pgs.
Huang et al., “Diffraction properties of substrate guided-wave holograms”, Optical Engineering, Oct. 1995, vol. 34, No. 10, pp. 2891-2899.
Huang et al., “Theory and characteristics of holographic polymer dispersed liquid crystal transmission grating with scaffolding morphology”, Applied Optics, Jun. 20, 2012, vol. 51, No. 18, pp. 4013-4020.
Iannacchione et al., “Deuterium NMR and morphology study of copolymer-dispersed liquid-crystal Bragg gratings”, Europhysics Letters, 1996, vol. 36, No. 6, pp. 425-430.
Jeng et al., “Aligning liquid crystal molecules”, SPIE, 2012, 10.1117/2.1201203.004148, 2 pgs.
Jo et al., “Control of Liquid Crystal Pretilt Angle using Polymerization of Reactive Mesogen”, IMID 2009 Digest, P1-25, 2009, pp. 604-606.
Juhl, “Interference Lithography for Optical Devices and Coatings”, Dissertation, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, 2010.
Juhl et al., “Holographically Directed Assembly of Polymer Nanocomposites”, ACS Nano, Oct. 7, 2010, vol. 4, No. 10, pp. 5953-5961.
Jurbergs et al., “New recording materials for the holographic industry”, Proc. of SPIE, 2009 vol. 7233, pp. 72330K-1-72330L-10, doi: 10.1117/12.809579.
Kahn et al., “Private Line Report on Large Area Display”, Kahn International, Jan. 7, 2003, vol. 8, No. 10, 9 pgs.
Karasawa et al., “Effects of Material Systems on the Polarization Behavior of Holographic Polymer Dispersed Liquid Crystal Gratings”, Japanese Journal of Applied Physics, Oct. 1997, vol. 36, No. 10, pp. 6388-6392.
Karp et al., “Planar micro-optic solar concentration using multiple imaging lenses into a common slab waveguide”, Proc. of SPIE vol. 7407, 2009 SPIE, pp. 74070D-1-74070D-11, CCC code: 0277-786X/09, doi: 10.1117/12.826531.
Karp et al., “Planar micro-optic solar concentrator”, Optics Express, Jan. 18, 2010, vol. 18, No. 2, pp. 1122-1133.
Kato et al., “Alignment-Controlled Holographic Polymer Dispersed Liquid Crystal (HPDLC) for Reflective Display Devices”, SPIE, 1998, vol. 3297, pp. 52-57.
Kessler, “Optics of Near to Eye Displays (NEDs)”, Oasis 2013, Tel Aviv, Feb. 19, 2013, 37 pgs.
Keuper et al., “26.1: RGB LED Illuminator for Pocket-Sized Projectors”, SID 04 DIGEST, 2004, ISSN/0004-0966X/04/3502, pp. 943-945.
Keuper et al., “P-126: Ultra-Compact LED based Image Projector for Portable Applications”, SID 03 DIGEST, 2003, ISSN/0003-0966X/03/3401-0713, pp. 713-715.
Kim et al., “Effect of Polymer Structure on the Morphology and Electro optic Properties of UV Curable PNLCs”, Polymer, Feb. 2000, vol. 41, pp. 1325-1335.
Kim et al., “Enhancement of electro-optical properties in holographic polymer-dispersed liquid crystal films by incorporation of multiwalled carbon nanotubes into a polyurethane acrylate matrix”, Polym. Int., Jun. 16, 2010, vol. 59, pp. 1289-1295.
Kim et al., “Fabrication of Reflective Holographic PDLC for Blue”, Molecular Crystals and Liquid Crystals Science, 2001, vol. 368, pp. 3845-3853.
Kim et al., “Optimization of Holographic PDLC for Green”, Mol. Cryst. Liq. Cryst., vol. 368, pp. 3855-3864, 2001.
Klein, “Optical Efficiency for Different Liquid Crystal Colour Displays”, Digital Media Department, HPL-2000-83, Jun. 29, 2000, 18 pgs.
Kogelnik, “Coupled Wave Theory for Thick Hologram Gratings”, The Bell System Technical Journal, vol. 48, No. 9, pp. 2909-2945, Nov. 1969.
Kotakonda et al., “Electro-optical Switching of the Holographic Polymer-dispersed Liquid Crystal Diffraction Gratings”, Journal of Optics A: Pure and Applied Optics, Jan. 1, 2009, vol. 11, No. 2, 11 pgs.
Kress et al., “Diffractive and Holographic Optics as Optical Combiners in Head Mounted Displays”, UbiComp '13, Sep. 9-12, 2013, Session: Wearable Systems for Industrial Augmented Reality Applications, pp. 1479-1482.
Lauret et al., “Solving the Optics Equation for Effective LED Applications”, Gaggione North America, LLFY System Design Workshop 2010, Oct. 28, 2010, 26 pgs.
Lee, “Patents Shows Widespread Augmented Reality Innovation”, PatentVue, May 26, 2015, 5 pgs.
Levola, “Diffractive optics for virtual reality displays”, Journal of the SID, 2006, 14/5, pp. 467-475.
Levola et al., “Near-to-eye display with diffractive exit pupil expander having chevron design”, Journal of the SID, 2008, 16/8, pp. 857-862.
Li et al., “Design and Optimization of Tapered Light Pipes”, Proceedings vol. 5529, Nonimaging Optics and Efficient Illumination Systems, Sep. 29, 2004, doi: 10.1117/12.559844, 10 pgs.
Li et al., “Dual Paraboloid Reflector and Polarization Recycling Systems for Projection Display”, Proceedings vol. 5002, Projection Displays IX, Mar. 28, 2003, doi: 10.1117/12.479585, 12 pgs.
Li et al., “Light Pipe Based Optical Train and its Applications”, Proceedings vol. 5524, Novel Optical Systems Design and Optimization VII, Oct. 24, 2004, doi: 10.1117/12.559833, 10 pgs.
Li et al., “Novel Projection Engine with Dual Paraboloid Reflector and Polarization Recovery Systems”, Wavien Inc., SPIE EI 5289-38, Jan. 21, 2004, 49 pgs.
Li et al., “Polymer crystallization/melting induced thermal switching in a series of holographically patterned Bragg reflectors”, Soft Matter, Jul. 11, 2005, vol. 1, pp. 238-242.
Lin et al., “Ionic Liquids in Photopolymerizable Holographic Materials”, in book: Holograms—Recording Materials and Applications, Nov. 9, 2011, 21 pgs.
Liu et al., “Holographic Polymer Dispersed Liquid Crystals Materials, Formation and Applications”, Advances in OptoElectronics, Nov. 30, 2008, vol. 2008, Article ID 684349, 52 pgs.
Lorek, “Experts Say Mass Adoption of augmented and Virtual Reality is Many Years Away”, Siliconhills, Sep. 9, 2017, 4 pgs.
Lowenthal et al., “Speckle Removal by a Slowly Moving Diffuser Associated with a Motionless Diffuser”, Journal of the Optical Society of America, Jul. 1971, vol. 61, No. 7, pp. 847-851.
Lu et al., “Polarization switch using thick holographic polymer-dispersed liquid crystal grating”, Journal of Applied Physics, Feb. 1, 2004, vol. 95, No. 3, pp. 810-815.
Lu et al., “The Mechanism of electric-field-induced segregation of additives in a liquid-crystal host”, Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys., Nov. 27, 2012, 14 pgs.
Ma et al., “Holographic Reversed-Mode Polymer-Stabilized Liquid Crystal Grating”, Chinese Phys. Lett., 2005, vol. 22, No. 1, pp. 103-106.
Mach et al., “Switchable Bragg diffraction from liquid crystal in colloid-templated structures”, Europhysics Letters, Jun. 1, 2002, vol. 58, No. 5, pp. 679-685.
Magarinos et al., “Wide Angle Color Holographic infinity optics display”, Air Force Systems Command, Brooks Air Force Base, Texas, AFHRL-TR-80-53, Mar. 1981, 100 pgs.
Marino et al., “Dynamical Behaviour of Policryps Gratings”, Electronic-Liquid Crystal Communications, Feb. 5, 2004, 10 pgs.
Massenot et al., “Multiplexed holographic transmission gratings recorded in holographic polymer-dispersed liquid crystals: static and dynamic studies”, Applied Optics, 2005, vol. 44, Issue 25, pp. 5273-5280.
Matay et al., “Planarization of Microelectronic Structures by Using Polyimides”, Journal of Electrical Engineering, 2002, vol. 53, No. 3-4, pp. 86-90.
Mathews, “The LED FAQ Pages”, Jan. 31, 2002, 23 pgs.
Matic, “Blazed phase liquid crystal beam steering”, Proc. of the SPIE, 1994, vol. 2120, pp. 194-205.
McLeod, “Axicons and Their Uses”, Journal of the Optical Society of America, Feb. 1960, vol. 50, No. 2, pp. 166-169.
McManamon et al., “A Review of Phased Array Steering for Narrow-Band Electrooptical Systems”, Proceedings of the IEEE, Jun. 2009, vol. 97, No. 6, pp. 1078-1096.
McManamon et al., “Optical Phased Array Technology”, Proceedings of the IEEE, Feb. 1996, vol. 84, Issue 2, pp. 268-298.
Miller, “Coupled Wave Theory and Waveguide Applications”, The Bell System Technical Journal, Short Hills, NJ, Feb. 2, 1954, 166 pgs.
Nair et al., “Enhanced Two-Stage Reactive Polymer Network Forming Systems”, Polymer (Guildf). May 25, 2012, vol. 53, No. 12, pp. 2429-2434, doi:10.1016/j.polymer.2012.04.007.
Nair et al., “Two-Stage Reactive Polymer Network Forming Systems”, Advanced Functional Materials, 2012, pp. 1-9, DOI: 10.1002/adfm.201102742.
Naqvi et al., “Concentration-dependent toxicity of iron oxide nanoparticles mediated by increased oxidative stress”, International Journal of Nanomedicine, Dovepress, Nov. 13, 2010, vol. 5, pp. 983-989.
Natarajan et al., “Electro Optical Switching Characteristics of Volume Holograms in Polymer Dispersed Liquid Crystals”, Journal of Nonlinear Optical Physics and Materials, 1997, vol. 5, No. 1, pp. 666-668.
Natarajan et al., “Electro-Optical Switching Characteristics of Volume Holograms in Polymer Dispersed Liquid Crystals”, Journal of Nonlinear Optical Physics and Materials, Jan. 1996, vol. 5, No. 1, pp. 89-98.
Natarajan et al., “Holographic polymer dispersed liquid crystal reflection gratings formed by visible light initiated thiol-ene photopolymerization”, Polymer, vol. 47, May 8, 2006, pp. 4411-4420.
Naydenova et al., “Low-scattering Volume Holographic Material”, DIT PhD Project, http://www.dit.ie/ieo/, Oct. 2017, 2 pgs.
Neipp et al., “Non-local polymerization driven diffusion based model: general dependence of the polymerization rate to the exposure intensity”, Optics Express, Aug. 11, 2003, vol. 11, No. 16, pp. 1876-1886.
Nishikawa et al., “Mechanically and Light Induced Anchoring of Liquid Crystal on Polyimide Film”, Mol. Cryst. Liq. Cryst., Aug. 1999, vol. 329, 8 pgs.
Nishikawa et al., “Mechanism of Unidirectional Liquid-Crystal Alignment on Polyimides with Linearly Polarized Ultraviolet Light Exposure”, Applied Physics Letters, May 11, 1998, vol. 72, No. 19, 4 pgs.
Oh et al., “Achromatic diffraction from polarization gratings with high efficiency”, Optic Letters, Oct. 15, 2008, vol. 33, No. 20, pp. 2287-2289.
Olson et al., “Templating Nanoporous Polymers with Ordered Block Copolymers”, Chemistry of Materials, Web publication Nov. 27, 2007, vol. 20, pp. 869-890.
Ondax, Inc., “Volume Holographic Gratings (VHG)”, 2005, 7 pgs.
Orcutt, “Coming Soon: Smart Glasses That Look Like Regular Spectacles”, Intelligent Machines, Jan. 9, 2014, 4 pgs.
Osredkar, “A study of the limits of spin-on-glass planarization process”, Informacije MIDEM, 2001, vol. 31, 2, ISSN0352-9045, pp. 102-105.
Osredkar et al., “Planarization methods in IC fabrication technologies”, Informacije MIDEM, 2002, vol. 32, 3, ISSN0352-9045, 5 pgs.
Ou et al., “A Simple LCOS Optical System (Late News)”, Industrial Technology Research Institute/OES Lab. Q100/Q200, SID 2002, Boston, USA, 2 pgs.
Paolini et al., “High-Power LED Illuminators in Projection Displays”, Lumileds, Aug. 7, 2001, 19 pgs.
Park et al., “Aligned Single-Wall Carbon Nanotube Polymer Composites Using an Electric Field”, Journal of Polymer Science: Part B: Polymer Physics, Mar. 24, 2006, DOI 10.1002/polb.20823, pp. 1751-1762.
Park et al., “Fabrication of Reflective Holographic Gratings with Polyurethane Acrylates (PUA)”, Current Applied Physics, Jun. 2002, vol. 2, pp. 249-252.
Plawsky et al., “Engineered nanoporous and nanostructured films”, MaterialsToday, Jun. 2009, vol. 12, No. 6, pp. 36-45.
Potenza, “These smart glasses automatically focus on what you're looking at”, The Verge, Voc Media, Inc., Jan. 29, 2017, https://www.theverge.com/2017/1/29/14403924/smart-glasses-automatic-focus-presbyopia-ces-2017, 6 pgs.
Presnyakov et al., “Electrically tunable polymer stabilized liquid-crystal lens”, Journal of Applied Physics, Apr. 29, 2005, vol. 97, pp. 103101-1-103101-6.
Qi et al., “P-111: Reflective Display Based on Total Internal Reflection and Grating-Grating Coupling”, Society for Information Display Digest, May 2003, pp. 648-651, DOI: 10.1889/1.1832359.
Ramón, “Formation of 3D micro- and nanostructures using liquid crystals as a template”, Technische Universiteit Eindhoven, Apr. 17, 2008, Thesis, DOI:http://dx.doi.org/10.6100/IR634422, 117 pgs.
Ramsey, “Holographic Patterning of Polymer Dispersed Liquid Crystal Materials for Diffractive Optical Elements”, Thesis, The University of Texas at Arlington, Dec. 2006, 166 pgs.
Ramsey et al., “Holographically recorded reverse-mode transmission gratings in polymer-dispersed liquid crystal cells”, Applied Physics B: Laser and Optics, Sep. 10, 2008, vol. 93, Nos. 2-3, pp. 481-489.
Reid, “Thin film silica nanocomposites for anti-reflection coatings”, Oxford Advance Surfaces, www.oxfordsurfaces.com, Oct. 18, 2012, 23 pgs.
Riechert, “Speckle Reduction in Projection Systems”, Dissertation, University Karlsruhe, 2009, 178 pgs.
Rossi et al., “Diffractive Optical Elements for Passive Infrared Detectors”, Submitted to OSA Topical Meeting “Diffractive Optics and Micro-Optics”, Quebec, Jun. 18-22, 2000, 3 pgs.
Saleh et al., “Fourier Optics: 4.1 Propagation of light in free space, 4.2 Optical Fourier Transform, 4.3 Diffraction of Light, 4.4 Image Formation, 4.5 Holography”, Fundamentals of Photonics 1991, Chapter 4, pp. 108-143.
Saraswat, “Deposition & Planarization”, EE 311 Notes, Aug. 29, 2017, 28 pgs.
Schreiber et al., “Laser display with single-mirror MEMS scanner”, Journal of the SID 17/7, 2009, pp. 591-595.
Seiberle et al., “Photo-aligned anisotropic optical thin films”, Journal of the SID 12/1, 2004, 6 pgs.
Serebriakov et al., “Correction of the phase retardation caused by intrinsic birefringence in deep UV lithography”, Proc. of SPIE, May 21, 2010, vol. 5754, pp. 1780-1791.
Shi et al., “Design considerations for high efficiency liquid crystal decentered microlens arrays for steering light”, Applied Optics, vol. 49, No. 3, Jan. 20, 2010, pp. 409-421.
Shriyan et al., “Analysis of effects of oxidized multiwalled carbon nanotubes on electro-optic polymer/liquid crystal thin film gratings”, Optics Express, Nov. 12, 2010, vol. 18, No. 24, pp. 24842-24852.
Simonite, “How Magic Leap's Augmented Reality Works”, Intelligent Machines, Oct. 23, 2014, 7 pgs.
Smith et al., “RM-PLUS—Overview”, Licrivue, Nov. 5, 2013, 16 pgs.
Sony Global, “Sony Releases the Transparent Lens Eyewear ‘SmartEyeglass Developer Edition’”, printed Oct. 19, 2017, Sony Global—News Releases, 5 pgs.
Steranka et al., “High-Power LEDs—Technology Status and Market Applications”, Lumileds, Jul. 2002, 23 pgs.
Stumpe et al., “Active and Passive LC Based Polarization Elements”, Mol. Cryst. Liq. Cryst., 2014, vol. 594: pp. 140-149.
Stumpe et al., “New type of polymer-LC electrically switchable diffractive devices—POLIPHEM”, May 19, 2015, p. 97.
Subbarayappa et al., “Bistable Nematic Liquid Crystal Device”, Jul. 30, 2009, 14 pgs.
Sun et al., “Effects of multiwalled carbon nanotube on holographic polymer dispersed liquid crystal”, Polymers Advanced Technologies, Feb. 19, 2010, DOI: 10.1002/pat.1708, 8 pgs.
Sun et al., “Low-birefringence lens design for polarization sensitive optical systems”, Proceedings of SPIE, 2006, vol. 6289, doi: 10.1117/12.679416, pp. 6289DH-1-6289DH-10.
Sun et al., “Transflective multiplexing of holographic polymer dispersed Tiquid crystal using Si additives”, eXPRESS Polymer Letters, 2011, vol. 5, No. 1, pp. 73-81.
Sutherland et al., “Bragg Gratings in an Acrylate Polymer Consisting of Periodic Polymer-Dispersed Liquid-Crystal Planes”, Chem. Mater., 1993, vol. 5, pp. 1533-1538.
Sutherland et al., “Electrically switchable volume gratings in polymer-dispersed liquid crystals”, Applied Physics Letters, Feb. 28, 1994, vol. 64, No. 9, pp. 1074-1076.
Sutherland et al., “Enhancing the electro-optical properties of liquid crystal nanodroplets for switchable Bragg gratings”, Proc. of SPIE, 2008, vol. 7050, pp. 705003-1-705003-9, doi: 10.1117/12.792629.
Sutherland et al., “Liquid crystal bragg gratings: dynamic optical elements for spatial light modulators”, Hardened Materials Branch, Hardened Materials Branch, AFRL-ML-WP-TP-2007-514, Jan. 2007, Wright-Patterson Air Force Base, OH, 18 pgs.
Sutherland et al., “The physics of photopolymer liquid crystal composite holographic gratings”, presented at SPIE: Diffractive and Holographic Optics Technology San Jose, CA, 1996, SPIE, vol. 2689, pp. 158-169.
Sweatt, “Achromatic triplet using holographic optical elements”, Applied Optics, May 1977, vol. 16, No. 5, pp. 1390-1391.
Talukdar, “Technology Forecast: Augmented reality”, Changing the economics of Smartglasses, Issue 2, 2016, 5 pgs.
Tao et al., “TiO2 nanocomposites with high refractive index and transparency”, J. Mater. Chem., Oct. 4, 2011, vol. 21, pp. 18623-18629.
Titus et al., “Efficient, Accurate Liquid Crystal Digital Light Deflector”, Proc. SPIE 3633, Diffractive and Holographic Technologies, Systems, and Spatial Light Modulators VI, 1 Jun. 1, 1999, doi: 10.1117/12.349334, 10 pgs.
Tiziani, “Physical Properties of Speckles”, Speckle Metrology, Chapter 2, Academic Press, Inc., 1978, pp. 5-9.
Tominaga et al., “Fabrication of holographic polymer dispersed liquid crystals doped with gold nanoparticles”, 2010 Japanese Liquid Crystal Society Annual Meeting, 2 pgs.
Tomita, “Holographic assembly of nanoparticles in photopolymers for photonic applications”, The International Society for Optical Engineering, SPIE Newsroom, 2006, 10.1117/2.1200612.0475, 3 pgs.
Trisnadi, “Hadamard Speckle Contrast Reduction”, Optics Letters, Jan. 1, 2004, vol. 29, No. 1, pp. 11-13.
Trisnadi, “Speckle contrast reduction in laser projection displays”, Proc. SPIE 4657, 2002, 7 pgs.
Tzeng et al., “Axially symmetric polarization converters based on photo-aligned liquid crystal films”, Optics Express, Mar. 17, 2008, vol. 16, No. 6, pp. 3768-3775.
Upatnieks et al., “Color Holograms for white light reconstruction”, Applied Physics Letters, Jun. 1, 1996, vol. 8, No. 11, pp. 286-287.
Ushenko, “The Vector Structure of Laser Biospeckle Fields and Polarization Diagnostics of Collagen Skin Structures”, Laser Physics, 2000, vol. 10, No. 5, pp. 1143-1149.
Valoriani, “Mixed Reality: Dalle demo a un prodotto”, Disruptive Technologies Conference, Sep. 23, 2016, 67 pgs.
Van Gerwen et al., “Nanoscaled interdigitated electrode arrays for biochemical sensors”, Sensors and Actuators, Mar. 3, 1998, vol. B 49, pp. 73-80.
Vecchi, “Studi Esr Di Sistemi Complessi Basati Su Cristalli Liquidi”, Thesis, University of Bologna, Department of Physical and Inorganic Chemistry, 2004-2006, 110 pgs.
Veltri et al., “Model for the photoinduced formation of diffraction gratings in liquid-crystalline composite materials”, Applied Physics Letters, May 3, 2004, vol. 84, No. 18, pp. 3492-3494.
Vita, “Switchable Bragg Gratings”, Thesis, Universita degli Studi di Napoli Federico II, Nov. 2005, 103 pgs.
Vuzix, “M3000 Smart Glasses, Advanced Waveguide Optics”, brochure, Jan. 1, 2017, 2 pgs.
Wang et al., “Liquid-crystal blazed-grating beam deflector”, Applied Optics, Dec. 10, 2000, vol. 39, No. 35, pp. 6545-6555.
Wang et al., “Optical Design of Waveguide Holographic Binocular Display for Machine Vision”, Applied Mechanics and Materials, Sep. 27, 2013, vols. 427-429, pp. 763-769.
Wang et al., “Speckle reduction in laser projection systems by diffractive optical elements”, Applied Optics, Apr. 1, 1998, vol. 37, No. 10, pp. 1770-1775.
Weber et al., “Giant Birefringent Optics in Multilayer Polymer Mirrors”, Science, Mar. 31, 2000, vol. 287, pp. 2451-2456.
Wei An, “Industrial Applications of Speckle Techniques”, Doctoral Thesis, Royal Institute of Technology, Department of Production Engineering, Chair of Industrial Metrology & Optics, Stockholm, Sweden 2002, 76 pgs.
Welde et al., “Investigation of methods for speckle contrast reduction”, Master of Science in Electronics, Jul. 2010, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Department of Electronics and Telecommunications, 127 pgs.
Weng et al., “Polarization volume grating with high efficiency and large diffraction angle”, Optics Express, 2016, vol. 24, pp. 17746-17759.
White, “Influence of thiol-ene polymer evolution on the formation and performance of holographic polymer dispersed liquid crystals”, The 232nd ACS National Meeting, San Francisco, CA, Sep. 10-14, 2006, 1 pg.
Wight et al., “Nanoporous Films with Low Refractive Index for Large-Surface Broad-Band Anti-Reflection Coatings”, Macromol. Mater. Eng., 2010, 295, DOI: 10.1002/mame.201000045, 9 pgs.
Wilderbeek et al., “Photoinitiated Bulk Polymerization of Liquid Crystalline Thiolene Monomers”, Macromolecules, 2002, vol. 35, pp. 8962-8969.
Wilderbeek et al., “Photo-Initiated Polymerization of Liquid Crystalline Thiol-Ene Monomers in Isotropic and Anisotropic Solvents”, J. Phys. Chem. B, 2002, vol. 106, No. 50, pp. 12874-12883.
Wofford et al., “Liquid crystal bragg gratings: dynamic optical elements for spatial light modulators”, Hardened Materials Branch, Survivability and Sensor Materials Division, AFRL-ML-WP-TP-2007-551, Air Force Research Laboratory, Jan. 2007, Wright-Patterson Air Force Base, OH, 17 pgs.
Yaqoob et al., “High-speed two-dimensional laser scanner based on Bragg grating stored in photothermorefractive glass”, Applied Optics, Sep. 10, 2003, vol. 42, No. 26, pp. 5251-5262.
Yaroshchuk et al., “Stabilization of liquid crystal photoaligning layers by reactive mesogens”, Applied Physics Letters, Jul. 14, 2009, vol. 95, pp. 021902-1-021902-3.
Ye, “Three-dimensional Gradient Index Optics Fabricated in Diffusive Photopolymers”, Thesis, Department of Electrical, Computer and Energy Engineering, University of Colorado, 2012, 224 pgs.
Yemtsova et al., “Determination of liquid crystal orientation in holographic polymer dispersed liquid crystals by linear and nonlinear optics”, Journal of Applied Physics, Oct. 13, 2008, vol. 104, pp. 073115-1-073115-4.
Yeralan et al., “Switchable Bragg grating devices for telecommunications applications”, Opt. Eng., Aug. 2012, vol. 41, No. 8, pp. 1774-1779.
Yoshida et al., “Nanoparticle-Dispersed Liquid Crystals Fabricated by Sputter Doping”, Adv. Mater., 2010, vol. 22, pp. 622-626.
Zhang et al., “Dynamic Holographic Gratings Recorded by Photopolymerization of Liquid Crystalline Monomers”, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1994, vol. 116, pp. 7055-7063.
Zhang et al., “Switchable Liquid Crystalline Photopolymer Media for Holography”, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1992, vol. 114, pp. 1506-1507.
Zhao et al., “Designing Nanostructures by Glancing Angle Deposition”, Proc. of SPIE, Oct. 27, 2003, vol. 5219, pp. 59-73.
Zlębacz, “Dynamics of nano and micro objects in complex liquids”, Ph.D. dissertation, Institute of Physical Chemistry of the Polish Academy of Sciences, Warsaw 2011, 133 pgs.
Zou et al., “Functionalized nano interdigitated electrodes arrays on polymer with integrated microfluidics for direct bio-affinity sensing using impedimetric measurement”, Sensors and Actuators A, Jan. 16, 2007, vol. 136, pp. 518-526.
Zyga, “Liquid crystals controlled by magnetic fields may lead to new optical applications”, Nanotechnology, Nanophysics, Retrieved from http://phys.org/news/2014-07-liquid-crystals-magnetic-fields-optical.html, Jul. 9, 2014, 3 pgs.
Extended European Search Report for European Application No. 19766755.3, Search completed Dec. 14, 2021, dated Jan. 4, 2022, 11 pgs.
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20220137294 A1 May 2022 US
Provisional Applications (1)
Number Date Country
62643977 Mar 2018 US
Continuations (2)
Number Date Country
Parent 16906872 Jun 2020 US
Child 17451223 US
Parent 16357233 Mar 2019 US
Child 16906872 US