The invention relates to a networkable programmable access control device configured to fit entirely within an existing home cage and to control access according to an operator-defined schedule.
As research grows, metabolic components to non-strictly metabolic diseases are being discovered. Research laboratories need a low-cost, high-throughput method to regulate an animal's metabolism.
Currently available technology is expensive and superfluous, making these options low-throughput for prospective interdisciplinary metabolic studies. Currently available automated food access methods for animals typically fall within three categories: metabolic, specially modified, or operant behavior cages.
Metabolic cages control numerous aspects of a single-housed animal's environment, including water, food, and exercise access, while simultaneously recording multiple data points. However, if automated food access is the only feature that is needed, then the metabolic cages are an expensive and superfluous alternative. This problem is compounded as the population size and duration of a study increases, requiring the use of more cages. Due to cost, animals (e.g. mice) are not typically raised in a metabolic cage, and thus, moving an animal from its home cage to a metabolic cage may induce anxiety and behavioral changes, risking the introduction of confounding variables. Metabolic cages are also bulky and usually not compatible with a vivarium's existing cage rack. Examples of metabolic cages include CLAMS from Columbus Instruments and the TSE Systems PhenoMaster.
Specially modified cages typically take an animal's current home cage and cut a hole in it to allow an external automated food access device. This prevents the need to transfer an animal to a different cage. However, modified cages expose the home cage to the outside environment, preventing recirculation of clean air into the home cage. This makes animals susceptible to potential airborne contagions, as well as researcher borne scents and confounding molecules within the vivarium. Additionally, since these cage modifications are external, a vivarium's existing cage rack would no longer be able to house the modified cage. Examples of specially modified cages are the Research Diet BioDAQ Gated and TSE Systems FeedTime.
Operant behavior cages can also provide automated food access but require conditioning the animals to perform a specific behavior before receiving a food reward, which introduces unnecessary confounding variables. These cages can be modified to instead dispense food during specific time intervals. However, the food is dispensed as reward pellets rather than standard chow and in pre-determined quantities, making it not an ideal solution when studies require unlimited food access during feeding times. Additionally, the animals have access to any excess food dispensed into the cage, defeating the purpose of having specific feeding time intervals. An example of an operant behavior cage includes the Noldus PhenoTyper.
Consequently, there is room in the art for improvement.
In an embodiment, an apparatus comprises at least one access control device, comprising: a controller configured to deliver access signals according to an access schedule based on data entered into the controller by an operator; and a movable barrier configured to be positioned in a home cage between a storage area and a living area and configured to be movable between an access position where there is unrestricted access to an item in the food storage area from the living area and a restricted position where the access is denied. The movable barrier is moved between the access position and the restricted position in response to the access signals. The movable barrier is configured to fit entirely within the home cage and a lid of the home cage without making any modifications to the home cage or the lid. In an embodiment, the movable barrier is configured to hang from a pre-existing food hopper configured for the home cage.
In an embodiment, at least one food access control device comprises two access control devices. In a server access control device of the two access control devices the controller comprises a server controller. In a client access control device of the two access control devices the controller comprises a client controller in signal communication with the server controller. In the server controller the access schedule is based on the data entered into the server controller by the operator. In the client controller the access schedule is based on the data entered into the server controller.
The invention is explained in the following description in view of the drawings that show:
The Inventors have developed a novel and innovative access control device capable of automatically controlling access to single-housed or group-housed animals based on an operator-designated schedule. The access control device can control access to food, to water, to an object, to a region within a cage, and/or may immobilize (restrict access to)/release (permit access to) a device (e.g. exercise wheel). The embodiment disclosed herein controls access to food, but the invention is not limited to this embodiment.
Designed as an alternative to expensive metabolic home cages, a food access control device is used in the animal's home cage, reducing potential confounding variables. To avoid taking up additional space in the home cage, this food access control device may operate within or suspend from an empty food hopper and does not interfere with the existing home cage lid or rack. One food access control device is needed per home cage and any number of home cages can be set up using this low-cost, high-throughput system.
As can be seen in
In an embodiment, the controller 104 is an open source controller capable of wireless local area networking using an Internet-of-Things platform. An example controller is a NodeMCU. The NodeMCU is a WiFi-capable microcontroller that can be programmed using C/C++ and is powered using a single micro USB cable. The NodeMCU is capable of controlling the positioning mechanism 106. In an embodiment, the positioning mechanism 106 is a servomotor or a stepper motor, which is a small motor capable of moving the movable barrier 108 back and forth between a restricted position 110 and an access position 112. In an embodiment, the servomotor/stepper motor rotates the movable barrier 108. In an embodiment, the rotation is 180 degrees.
The food access control device 100 is configured to fit entirely within the home cage 102. In an embodiment, the food access control device 100 fits between living area 114 and a food storage area 116. In an embodiment, the food access control device 100 fits within or is suspended from a hopper 118 of the home cage 102. In an embodiment, the food access control device 100 fits entirely within the home cage 102 and a lid when the home cage 102 and the lid form a seal configured to keep out unfiltered, environmental air.
When using only one server food access control device 120, the food access control device 100 is designated a server food access control device 120.
As shown in
In an embodiment, the input device 130 includes a keypad 132 and a display 134. In an embodiment, the display 134 is a small OLED display with a keypad 132 that permits quick and easy adjustments to the server schedule. Alternately, or in addition to the input device 130, the data may be input into the server food access control device 120 wirelessly using a WiFi-capable device such as a smart phone or the like. Neither method requires an internet connection.
In an alternate embodiment, (shown superimposed on
In other alternate embodiments, the positioning mechanism 106 operates to control access to water, to an object, and/or to a region in the cage.
In an embodiment, the server food access control device 120 includes a real-time clock module 136 that keeps accurate time. The real-time clock module 136 includes a small battery that maintains accurate time during a loss of external power. In the server food access control device 120, the controller 104 is designated a server controller 140. The server controller 140 includes a server controller time clock 142. Should the power supply be interrupted, the battery on the real-time clock module 136 will maintain the server controller time clock 142 and the server schedule. Once the power supply is restored, the client food access control devices 150 will communicate with the server controller 140 and synchronize their time and their schedule with the server controller time clock 142 and the server schedule.
A food access control apparatus includes a server food access control device 120 and any number (zero or more) of client food access control devices 150.
The apparatus described herein provides several benefits. A first benefit is efficiency. Currently available alternatives use multiple cables to power superfluous home cage components or require setup using proprietary computers and software. Only a single micro USB cable is required to make the food access control device 100 fully functional. Each client food access control device 150 may receive its schedule data through a wireless connection to the server food access control device 120. This removes the need to individually adjust each client food access control device 150. The server schedule can be adjusted at any time via the input device 130 on the server food access control device 120 or by wirelessly connecting to the server food access control device 120 via a WiFi-capable device, such as a phone, tablet, or laptop (not included). One food access control device 100 is required per home cage 102 and any number of food access control devices 100 can be used simultaneously in the food access control apparatus.
A second benefit is simplicity. The food access control device's 100 simple design allows it to be easily swapped in and out of each home cage 102 without taking up additional cage space by utilizing the already occupied space of the empty food hopper. Unlike some currently available alternatives, the food access control device 100 is designed to be used in the original home cage, reducing anxiety and behavioral changes in study animals due to cage transfers. Most alternatives were designed for use with single-housed animals, but the food access control device 100 can be used with either single-housed or group-housed animals. The food access control device's 100 small design does not interfere with the vivarium's existing cage rack, unlike currently available alternatives, which require animals to be housed away from standard housing racks.
A third benefit is cost savings: The food access control device 100 is significantly less expensive than known competitive products. Competitive products additionally require that the home cage lid be replaced with a cage lid that exposes the animals to room air rather than the filtered air provided through standard housing home cage lids.
While various embodiments of the present invention have been shown and described herein, it will be obvious that such embodiments are provided by way of example only. Numerous variations, changes, and substitutions may be made without departing from the invention herein. Accordingly, it is intended that the invention be limited only by the spirit and scope of the appended claims.
| Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| PCT/US2020/048751 | 8/31/2020 | WO |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 62893446 | Aug 2019 | US |