Optical systems and components thereof are disclosed which may be used for efficiently coupling laser energy into an optical conduit while maintaining a homogenous far field beam output from the optical conduit. Some embodiments are directed more specifically to far field beam homogenization of optical fiber coupled radiation from a plurality of discrete emitters.
Applications requiring light energy and, in some embodiments, laser energy, may benefit from the use of solid state light sources such as laser diodes which are commonly available, reliable to operate and relatively cost effective as a laser energy source. Such devices may include a plurality of laser emitters in a single bar that each emit laser light simultaneously in a substantially parallel orientation. In addition, multiple solid state or laser emitter bars may be disposed in a stacked configuration so as to generate even higher power levels in some instances. Laser diode bars are often used for communication technology devices, medical applications and other applications such as military applications. For some of these applications, as well as others, it may be desirable to couple the output of all the emitters of a single solid state emitter bar or multiple bars in a stacked configuration into a single optical fiber or other optical conduit.
In some circumstances, coupling laser radiation from a linear array of multiple discrete emitters into an optical conduit may result in a non-homogeneous output from the optical conduit in the far field pattern emitted from the optical conduit. Such a non-homogeneous far field pattern may result from the discrete angular distribution of the multiple emitters being coupled into the optical conduit relative to a longitudinal input axis of the optical conduit. This may be particularly true in optical system embodiments which require each beam to be spaced from adjacent beams while propagating through at least some of the optical components of the optical system. For some systems, the separation includes gaps between adjacent beams which may then result in discrete launch angles for each beam or set of beams into the optical conduit. The discrete launch angles into the optical conduit generate a non-homogeneous far field pattern of emission from the optical conduit. This type of far field pattern may include low intensity regions that cause inefficient coupling or transmission of the light in the far field. In addition, this type of far field pattern may include high intensity regions or hot spots that may cause damage to materials with which the far field beam interacts.
What has been needed are methods and devices for generating a homogenous or substantially homogeneous far field beam distribution for the output of an optical conduit. More specifically, what has been needed are methods and devices for generating homogeneous far field beam patterns from an optical conduit from an input source with multiple beams having discrete launch angles.
Some embodiments of an optical system include a plurality of equally and linearly spaced emitters in a linear array configured to generate a respective plurality of substantially parallel equally spaced output beams. The output beams propagate along output axes of the respective emitters in a symmetrical distribution about a center output beam axis of a center emitter. The system may also include a focusing optic which has an optical axis of symmetry and which is configured to focus or otherwise condense the plurality of substantially parallel output beams from the emitters. The focusing optic may be transversely shifted such that the optical axis of symmetry of the focusing optic is displaced about one eighth the pitch of the plurality of emitters to about three eighths the pitch of the plurality of emitters from the center output axis. The optical system may also include an optical conduit positioned such that an input surface of the optical conduit is operatively coupled to an output axis and focal region of the focusing optic. In some instances, the system may include a beam reformatting optic configured to rotate each beam about its axis about 80 degrees to about 100 degrees, more specifically, about 88 degrees to about 92 degrees. Some system embodiments also include a fast axis collimator, a slow axis collimator or both which may be operatively coupled to the beam axes.
Some embodiments of an optical system include a plurality of equally and linearly spaced emitters in a linear array configured to generate a respective plurality of substantially parallel equally spaced output beams. The output beams may propagate along output axes of the respective emitters in a symmetrical distribution about a center output beam axis of a center emitter. The system may also include a focusing optic which is configured to focus or otherwise condense the plurality of substantially parallel output beams from the emitters. The focusing optic includes an optical axis of symmetry aligned or substantially aligned with the center output axis. The system also has an optical conduit which has a transmitting core. The transmitting core of the optical conduit includes an input surface that is operatively coupled to an output axis and focal region of the focusing optic. The transmitting core further includes a longitudinal axis disposed at a tilt angle with respect to the center beam output axis. The tilt angle may lie substantially in a plane defined by the plurality of beams incident on the optical conduit. The tilt angle may have a magnitude of about one half of the angle formed between adjacent emitter beam axes for beams disposed between the focusing optic and the input of the optical conduit. Some system embodiments also include a beam reformatting optic configured to rotate each beam about a longitudinal axis of the beam by about 80 degrees to about 100 degrees, more specifically, about 88 degrees to about 92 degrees. For some embodiments, the angle formed between adjacent emitter axes between the focusing optic and the input of the optical conduit may be substantially equal to the pitch between adjacent emitters divided by the focal length of the focusing optic. Some system embodiments also include a fast axis collimator, a slow axis collimator or both which may be operatively coupled to the beam axes.
Some embodiments of an optical system include a plurality of equally and linearly spaced emitters in a linear array. The emitters may be configured to generate a respective plurality of substantially parallel equally spaced output beams which propagate along output axes of the respective emitters in a symmetrical distribution about a center output axis of a center emitter. A focusing optic may be operatively coupled to the plurality of emitters and configured to focus the plurality of substantially parallel output beams from the emitters. The system may also include an optical conduit having a transmitting core which includes an input surface that is operatively coupled to an output axis and focal region of the focusing optic. The transmitting core includes a longitudinal axis disposed substantially parallel to the center output axis of the center emitter. The input surface also includes an input angle with respect to a plane that is orthogonal to the longitudinal axis of the transmitting core. The input angle lies substantially in a plane defined by the plurality of beams incident on the optical conduit and may have a magnitude of about
θ1/4(n−1)
wherein θ1 is the angle formed between adjacent emitter beam axes of beams between the focusing optic and the input of the optical conduit and n is the index of refraction of the transmitting core. In some instances, the system also includes a beam reformatting optic configured to rotate each beam about a longitudinal axis of each beam by about 80 degrees to about 100 degrees, more specifically, about 88 degrees to about 92 degrees. For some embodiments, the angle formed between adjacent emitter axes between the focusing optic and the input of the optical conduit is substantially equal to the pitch between adjacent emitters divided by the focal length of the focusing optic. Some system embodiments also include a fast axis collimator, a slow axis collimator or both which may be operatively coupled to the beam axes.
Some embodiments of an optical system include a plurality of equally and linearly spaced emitters configured to generate a respective plurality of substantially parallel equally spaced output beams. The output beams are configured to propagate along output axes of the respective emitters in a symmetrical distribution about a center output axis of a center emitter. A focusing optic may be operatively coupled to the plurality of emitters and configured to focus or otherwise condense the plurality of substantially parallel output beams from the emitters. The system may also include an optical conduit that has a transmitting core. The transmitting core may include an input surface that is operatively coupled to an output axis and focal region of the focusing optic. The transmitting core may also include a longitudinal axis disposed substantially parallel to the center output axis of the center emitter. The input surface includes two facets in a chisel-like configuration forming input angles which are measured between each respective facet surface and a plane that is orthogonal to the longitudinal axis of the transmitting core. The input angles lie substantially in a plane defined by the plurality of beams incident on the optical conduit and may have a magnitude of about
θ1/4(n−1)
wherein θ1 is the angle formed between adjacent emitter beam axes of beams between the focusing optic and the input of the optical conduit and n is the index of refraction of the transmitting core. For some embodiments, the two facets of the input surface have a convex configuration and for other embodiments the two facets of the input surface of the transmitting core have a concave configuration. For some embodiments, the system may also include a beam reformatting optic configured to rotate each beam about a longitudinal axis of each beam by about 80 degrees to about 100 degrees, more specifically, about 88 degrees to about 92 degrees. For some embodiments, the angle formed between adjacent emitter axes between the focusing optic and the input of the optical conduit is substantially equal to the pitch between adjacent emitters divided by the focal length of the focusing optic. Some system embodiments also include a fast axis collimator, a slow axis collimator or both which may be operatively coupled to the beam axes.
Some embodiments of an optical system include a plurality of equally and linearly spaced emitters configured to generate a respective plurality of substantially parallel equally spaced output beams. The output beams are configured to propagate along output axes of the respective emitters in a symmetrical distribution about a center output axis of a center emitter. A focusing optic may be operatively coupled to the plurality of emitters and configured to focus or otherwise condense the plurality of substantially parallel output beams from the emitters. The system may also include an optical conduit having a transmitting core with an input surface that is operatively coupled to an output axis and focal region of the focusing optic. The transmitting core of the optical conduit has a longitudinal axis which may be disposed substantially parallel to the center output axis of the center emitter. The input surface includes four facets in a convex trocar-like configuration forming input angles which are measured between each respective facet surface and a plane that is orthogonal to the longitudinal axis of the transmitting core. The input angles may have a magnitude of about
θ1/4(n−1)
wherein θ1 is the angle formed between adjacent emitter beam axes of beams between the focusing optic and the input of the optical conduit and n is the index of refraction of the transmitting core. For some embodiments, the system may include a beam reformatting optic configured to rotate each beam about a longitudinal axis of each beam by about 80 degrees to about 100 degrees, more specifically, about 88 degrees to about 92 degrees. For some embodiments, the angle formed between adjacent emitter axes between the focusing optic and the input of the optical conduit is substantially equal to the pitch between adjacent emitters divided by the focal length of the focusing optic. Some system embodiments also include a fast axis collimator, a slow axis collimator or both which may be operatively coupled to the beam axes.
Some embodiments of an optical system include a plurality of equally and linearly spaced emitters configured to generate a respective plurality of substantially parallel equally spaced output beams. The output beams are configured to propagate along output axes of the respective emitters in a symmetrical distribution about a center output axis of a center emitter. A focusing optic may be operatively coupled to the plurality of emitters and configured to focus or otherwise condense a plurality of substantially parallel output beams from the emitters. The system also includes an optical conduit with a transmitting core. The transmitting core has an input surface which is operatively coupled to an output axis and focal region of the focusing optic. The input surface includes a rounded configuration having an apex substantially centered on the input surface. For some embodiments, the system may include a beam reformatting optic configured to rotate each beam about a longitudinal axis of each beam by about 80 degrees to about 100 degrees, more specifically, about 88 degrees to about 92 degrees. Some system embodiments also include a fast axis collimator, a slow axis collimator or both which may be operatively coupled to the beam axes. In some instances, the rounded configuration of the input surface of the transmitting core may be substantially spherical and may have a radius of curvature of about 0.4 mm to about 1.2 mm.
Some embodiments of an optical system including a plurality of linearly spaced emitters configured to generate a respective plurality of substantially parallel equally spaced output beams along output axes of the respective emitters in a symmetrical distribution about a center output axis of a center emitter. A focusing optic may be operatively coupled to the plurality of emitters and configured to focus a plurality of substantially parallel output beams from the emitters. The system may also include an optical conduit having a transmitting core that includes an input surface which is operatively coupled to an output axis and focal region of the focusing optic. The input surface of the optical conduit includes a cylindrical lens element substantially centered on the input surface. The input surface also has a radius of curvature lying substantially in a plane defined by the beams incident on the optical conduit. For some embodiments the cylindrical lens element has a convex configuration and for some embodiments the cylindrical lens element has a concave configuration. The radius of curvature of the cylindrical lens element may be about 0.2 mm to about 1.5 mm in some instances. For some embodiments, the system may also include a beam reformatting optic configured to rotate each beam about a longitudinal axis of each beam by about 80 degrees to about 100 degrees, more specifically, about 88 degrees to about 92 degrees. Some system embodiments also include a fast axis collimator, a slow axis collimator or both which may be operatively coupled to the beam axes.
Some embodiments of an optical system include a plurality of equally and linearly spaced emitters configured to generate a respective plurality of substantially parallel equally spaced output beams. The output beams may be configured to propagate along output axes of the respective emitters in a symmetrical distribution about a center output axis of a center emitter. A focusing optic may be operatively coupled to the plurality of emitters and configured to focus or otherwise condense the plurality of substantially parallel output beams from the emitters. The system may also include an optical conduit having a transmitting core that includes an input surface which is operatively coupled to an output axis and focal region of the focusing optic. An optical shift element may be disposed generally between the plurality of emitters and focusing optic. The optical shift element may be configured to refract and shift the optical axes of the output beams which are on one side of the center output beam axis. Some embodiments of the system may also include a beam reformatting optic configured to rotate each beam about a longitudinal axis of the beam by about 80 degrees to about 100 degrees, more specifically, about 88 degrees to about 92 degrees. Some embodiments of the optical shift element include a block of transmissive material having an input surface which is parallel to an output surface. The optical shift element may also include a wedge of transmissive material. Some system embodiments also include a fast axis collimator, a slow axis collimator or both which may be operatively coupled to the beam axes.
Some embodiments of an optical system include a plurality of equally and linearly spaced emitters configured to generate a respective plurality of substantially parallel equally spaced output beams. The beams may be configured to propagate along output axes of the respective emitters in a symmetrical distribution about a center output axis of a center emitter. A focusing optic may be operatively coupled to the plurality of emitters and configured to focus or otherwise condense the plurality of substantially parallel output beams from the emitters. The system may also include an optical conduit having a transmitting core that has an input surface which is operatively coupled to an output axis and focal region of the focusing optic. The optical system may also include a telescope array which is disposed in operative arrangement within an optical train of the optical system between the plurality of linearly spaced emitters and the focusing optic. Some system embodiments also include a fast axis collimator, a slow axis collimator or both which may be operatively coupled to the beam axes. For such embodiments, the telescope array may be disposed between the fast axis collimator and focusing optic. In some instances, the telescope array may be disposed between an optional beam reformatting optic and a slow axis collimator of the optical system. In some embodiments, the telescope array may be so disposed immediately adjacent the optional beam reformatting element or optic. The telescope array may be configured to expand each beam from the laser emitter bar to contact or overlap adjacent beams prior to focusing of the beams into the optical conduit. The expansion of each beam may be achieved by the telescope elements without adding substantial or significant divergence or convergence of the individual beams. For some embodiments, the system may include a beam reformatting optic which may be configured to rotate each beam about its axis about 80 degrees to about 100 degrees, more specifically, about 88 degrees to about 92 degrees. For some embodiments, the telescope array may include an array of Keplerian telescopes having a pitch substantially the same as the plurality of linearly spaced emitters. For some embodiments, the telescope array may include an array of Galilean telescopes having a pitch substantially the same as the plurality of linearly spaced emitters.
These features of embodiments will become more apparent from the following detailed description when taken in conjunction with the accompanying exemplary drawings.
Embodiments discussed herein are directed to methods and devices for manipulating an output of multiple emitters such as laser emitter bars or chips having one or more emitters disposed therein. Embodiments discussed herein are also directed to methods and devices for coupling an output of laser emitter bars to an optical conduit, such as an optical fiber. Some optical system embodiments which are useful for coupling the output beams of multiple emitters to an optical conduit may include a beam reformatting optic. Some embodiments of such optical systems may include a beam reformatting optic that rotates each beam from each emitter individually or performs some other reformatting function. For such embodiment, it may be desirable to maintain spatial separation between each beam as they propagate through at least a portion of the optical train of the optical system. If the beams of the optical system are separated from adjacent beams upon launch into an optical conduit, the discrete launch angles of each beam or set of beams may result in a non-homogeneous output distribution in the far field pattern of the output of the optical conduit.
Regarding the laser emitter bar 22,
Laser emitter bar embodiments 22 may have any suitable number of emitters, such as about 1 emitter to about 100 emitters, more specifically, about 3 emitters to about 12 emitters. For some embodiments, each laser emitter bar 22 having about 5 emitters 16 may have an output power of about 5 Watts (W) to about 90 W, more specifically, about 15 W to about 70 W, and even more specifically, about 20 W to about 30 W. Emitters 42 may include laser diodes such as edge emitting laser diodes, vertical cavity surface emitting lasers (VCSELs) and the like. Materials for the emitters 42 of the laser emitter bar 22 may include semiconductor materials such as GaAs, InP or any other suitable laser gain medium.
Generally, the emitting aperture of a laser diode embodiment of an emitter embodiment 42 may be rectangular in shape with the long dimension of the emitter having a size of typically tens or hundreds of microns, while the short dimension is typically one to several microns in size. Radiation emerging from an emitter 42 diverges with the divergence angle being greater along the short emitter direction. Divergence angles are lower in the direction of the long emitter direction. Some embodiments of the emitters 42 may have a physical width of about 30 microns to about 300 microns, more specifically, about 50 microns to about 200 microns, and the emitters may have a height of about 1 micron to about 3 microns. Some emitter embodiments 42 may have a cavity length of about 0.5 mm to about 10 mm, more specifically, about 1 mm to about 7 mm, and even more specifically, about 3 mm to about 6 mm. Such emitter embodiments 42 may have a divergence of light energy output of about 2 degrees to about 14 degrees, more specifically, about 4 degrees to about 12 degrees, in the slow axis direction and a divergence of light energy output of about 30 degrees to about 75 degrees in the fast axis direction.
Some embodiments of the laser emitter bars 22 may have emitters 42 that emit light energy having a wavelength of about 700 nm to about 1500 nm, more specifically, about 800 nm to about 1000 nm. Emitters 42 may emit light having a centroid or peak wavelength of about 300 nm to about 2000 nm, more specifically, of about 600 nm to about 1000 nm, including wavelengths across the near infrared spectrum. Some particular embodiments of useful emitters 42 may emit light at a peak wavelength of about 350 nm to about 550 nm, 600 nm to about 1350 nm or about 1450 nm to about 2000 nm. Such laser diode bars 22 may be operated in either a pulsed mode or continuous wave mode. Frequently, the output spectral band of individual emitters 42 which are not wavelength controlled (for example wavelength controlled by providing wavelength-dependent feedback from a volume index grating or the like) may be about 0.5 nm to about 2.0 nm or more. Due to the variation in peak emission wavelength in addition to the spectral band for each individual emitter 42, the overall bandwidth of the laser emitter bar may be about 2 nm to about 5 nm, for some embodiments.
Regarding the beam reformatting optic 34,
As discussed above, each emitter 42 of the laser emitter bar 22 emits a discrete beam 46 that is substantially collimated along the fast axis by the fast axis collimator. Each beam then passes through a respective lens pair of the beam reformatting optic 34 for rotation about an optical axis of each beam of about 80 degrees to about 100 degrees, more specifically, about 88 degrees to about 92 degrees. Once the output beams 46 have passed through the beam reformatting optic 34, they pass through the slow axis collimator 28. Because the fast and slow axes of the output beams 46 have been reversed by the beam reformatting optic 34, the slow axis collimator 28 disposed after the beam reformatting optic 34 may be a singlet cylindrical lens. The slow axis collimator 28 substantially collimates each individual beam 46 along the slow axis direction. After transmission through the slow axis collimator 28, each substantially collimated beam 46 propagates to the focusing optic 32.
The focusing optic 32 may include a single lens or multiple optics that is configured to focus or otherwise condense the substantially collimated beams 46 to a region or focal point which may then be directed into the input surface 37 of the optical conduit or optical fiber 24. The optical conduit shown includes the optical fiber 24 which may be a multimode optical fiber having an amorphous core material and an amorphous cladding material having an index of refraction less than an index of refraction of the core material. Although a solid material multimode optical fiber embodiment 24 is shown, any other suitable optical conduit may be used. In particular, the optical conduit may include single mode optical fibers, hollow waveguides, crystalline optical fibers, polymer optical fibers or the like. Because the beam reformatting optic 34 operates on each beam discretely without overlap or contact between beams 46, each beam incident on the focusing optic 32 may still be discrete without contact or overlap. As such, each beam 46 or symmetrical pair of opposed beams will be focused by the focusing optic 32 and launch into the input surface 37 of the optical fiber 24 at a discrete angle. This arrangement may then produce a beam intensity distribution in the far field emission pattern 10 from an output surface (not shown) of the optical fiber 24 as indicated by the pattern 10 of
The non-homogeneous far field pattern 10 of
Such an optical system 20 may include a plurality of linearly spaced emitters 42 configured to generate a respective plurality of substantially parallel equally spaced output beams 46 along output axes 44 of the emitters 42 in a symmetrical distribution about a center output axis of a center emitter. The focusing optic 32 includes an optical axis of symmetry, which is configured to focus the plurality of substantially parallel output beams 46 from the emitters 42. The optical conduit 24 is positioned such that an input surface 37 of the optical conduit 24 is operatively coupled to an output axis and focal region of the focusing optic 32. The focusing optic 32 is also transversely shifted such that the optical axis of symmetry of the focusing optic is displaced about one eighth the pitch of the plurality of emitters 42 to about three eighths the pitch of the plurality of emitters 42 from the center output axis of the center beam. For some embodiments, the focusing optic 32 is transversely shifted about one quarter the pitch P of the plurality of emitters 42 from the center output axis. Some system embodiments also include a fast axis collimator 26, a slow axis collimator 28 or both which may be operatively coupled to the beam axes 44. The fast axis collimator 26 may be configured to substantially collimate the output of each emitter 42 in a fast axis direction and the slow axis collimator 28 may be configured to substantially collimate the output of each emitter 42 in a slow axis direction. It should be noted that the fast axis collimator 26 and slow axis collimator 28 may be configured to exert their optical power in the same plane in systems which include a beam reformatting optic 34 that rotates each beam 46, as is shown in the system of
In some instances, system embodiments 20 may also include a fast axis collimator 26, a slow axis collimator 28 or both which may be operatively coupled to the beam axes 44. The fast axis collimator 26 may be configured to substantially collimate the output of each emitter 42 in a fast axis direction and the slow axis collimator 28 may be configured to substantially collimate the output of each emitter 42 in a slow axis direction.
θ1/4(n−1)
wherein θ1 is the angle formed between adjacent emitter beam axes 44 of beams 46 between the focusing optic 32 and the input 37 of the optical conduit 24 and n is the index of refraction of the transmitting core of the optical fiber 24.
For some embodiments, the angle θ1 formed between adjacent emitter axes 44 between the focusing optic 32 and the input 37 of the optical conduit 24 may be substantially equal to the pitch P between adjacent emitters divided by the focal length of the focusing optic 32. For some embodiments, the input angle α may be from about 1 degree to about 3 degrees. Some system embodiments 20 also include a fast axis collimator 26, a slow axis collimator 28 or both which may be operatively coupled to the beam axes 44. The fast axis collimator 26 may be configured to substantially collimate the output of each emitter 42 in a fast axis direction and the slow axis collimator 28 may be configured to substantially collimate the output of each emitter 42 in a slow axis direction.
For Ray 0 and Ray 1, the following equations are given by Snell's law:
sin α=n sin φ0 (1)
sin(θ1+α)=n sin φ1 (2)
Where n is the index of refraction of the optical fiber core 68 and the air disposed about the input surface 37 of the optical fiber core 68 has an index of refraction of 1.
These equations (1) and (2) may be approximated as:
α=nφ0 (3)
θ1+α=nφ1 (4)
For the circumstance described above where Ray 0 and Ray 1 are symmetric with the longitudinal axis 66 of the optical fiber 24, a center portion 12 of the far field output pattern 10 of the optical fiber 24 would be dark or of low intensity. To achieve this configuration,
α−φ0=φ1−α (5)
Combining equations (3)-(5) gives
α=θ1/2(n−1) (6)
To fill the center portion 12 of the far field pattern 10, the input angle should be about one half the angle α given in equation (6). Therefore, an embodiment of a desired input angle α′ for the core of the optical fiber that may be configured to substantially homogenize the far field pattern of the optical fiber output may be about
α′=θ1/4(n−1)
as discussed above.
For some such embodiments, θ1 may be equal to the pitch of the beams before the focusing optic divided by the focal length of the focusing optic.
θ1/4(n−1)
wherein θ1 is the angle formed between adjacent emitter beam axes 44 of beams 46 between the focusing optic 32 and the input 37 of the optical conduit 24 and n is the index of refraction of the transmitting core 68. For some embodiments, the angle formed between adjacent emitter axes 44 between the focusing optic 32 and the input 37 of the optical conduit 24 is substantially equal to the pitch P between adjacent emitters 42 divided by the focal length of the focusing optic 32. For some embodiments, the input angles α may be from about 0.8 degrees to about 2 degrees. Some system embodiments 20 also include a fast axis collimator 26, a slow axis collimator 28 or both which may be operatively coupled to the beam axes 44. The fast axis collimator 26 may be configured to substantially collimate the output of each emitter 42 in a fast axis direction and the slow axis collimator 28 may be configured to substantially collimate the output of each emitter 42 in a slow axis direction.
θ1/4(n−1)
wherein θ1 is the angle formed between adjacent emitter beam axes 44 of beams 46 between the focusing optic 32 and the input 37 of the optical conduit 24 and n is the index of refraction of the transmitting core 68. For some embodiments, the angle θ1 formed between adjacent emitter axes 44 between the focusing optic 32 and the input 37 of the optical conduit 24 is substantially equal to the pitch P between adjacent emitters 42 divided by the focal length of the focusing optic 32. For some embodiments, the input angles α may be from about 0.8 degrees to about 2 degrees. Some system embodiments 20 also include a fast axis collimator 26, a slow axis collimator 28 or both which may be operatively coupled to the beam axes 44. The fast axis collimator 26 may be configured to substantially collimate the output of each emitter 42 in a fast axis direction and the slow axis collimator may be configured to substantially collimate the output of each emitter 42 in a slow axis direction.
The optical system 20 as incorporated may include a plurality of linearly spaced emitters 42 configured to generate a respective plurality of substantially parallel equally spaced output beams 46 along output axes 44 of the respective emitters 42 in a symmetrical distribution about a center output axis 62 of a center emitter. The focusing optic 32 may be operatively coupled to the plurality of emitters 42 and configured to focus a plurality of substantially parallel output beams 46 from the emitters 42. The optical conduit 24 may include a transmitting core 68 having an input surface 37 that is operatively coupled to an output axis and focal region of the focusing optic 32. The transmitting core 68 may have a longitudinal axis 66 which is disposed substantially parallel to the center output axis 62 of the center emitter. The input surface 37 of the optical conduit 24 may include four facets 82 in a convex trocar-like configuration forming input angles α which are measured between each respective facet surface 82 and a plane 72 that is orthogonal to the longitudinal axis 66 of the optical conduit core, as shown in
For such an embodiment, the input angles α may have a magnitude of about
θ1/4(n−1)
wherein θ1 is the angle formed between adjacent emitter beam axes 44 of beams 46 between the focusing optic 32 and the input surface 37 of the optical conduit 24 and n is the index of refraction of the transmitting core 68. For some embodiments, the angle θ1 formed between adjacent emitter axes 44 between the focusing optic 32 and the input surface 37 of the optical conduit 24 is substantially equal to the pitch P between adjacent emitters 42 divided by the focal length of the focusing optic 32. For some embodiments, the input angles α may be from about 1 degree to about 3 degrees. Some system embodiments 20 also include a fast axis collimator 26, a slow axis collimator 28 or both which may be operatively coupled to the beam axes 44. The fast axis collimator 26 may be configured to substantially collimate the output of each emitter 42 in a fast axis direction and the slow axis collimator 28 may be configured to substantially collimate the output of each emitter 42 in a slow axis direction.
The input surface 37 of the optical conduit 24 may include a convex rounded configuration that may have an optical axis 84 or surface apex that is substantially centered on the input surface 37 or aligned with a longitudinal axis 66 of the optical conduit. The convex rounded configuration of the input surface may be substantially symmetrical with respect to the optical axis of the input surface 84 or longitudinal axis 66 of the core of the optical conduit 24, for some embodiments. In some instances, the optical conduit may be an optical fiber 24, such as a multimode optical fiber having a core 68 and cladding 70 with a step index configuration, such as is shown in
For some embodiments, the rounded configuration of the input surface 37 of the optical conduit 24 may be formed from material separate from the transmitting core 68 and may be secured in operative arrangement to the transmitting core 68. In some instances, the rounded configuration of the input surface 37 of the optical conduit 24 includes a substantially spherical configuration or partially spherical section. Rounded configurations having the shape of a substantially spherical section may have a radius of curvature R of about 300 microns to about 900 microns for some embodiments, other embodiments may have a radius of curvature R of about 400 microns to about 1200 microns. For some embodiments, the optical conduit 24 may include a multimode optical fiber 24 having a core 68 with a transverse dimension or diameter of about 50 microns to about 400 microns.
For some embodiments, the concave rounded configuration of the input surface 37 of the optical conduit 24 may be formed into the material of the transmitting core 68 of the optical conduit 24. For some embodiments, the concave rounded configuration of the input surface 37 of the optical conduit 24 may be formed into material separate from the transmitting core 68 and may be secured in operative arrangement to the transmitting core 68. In some instances, the rounded configuration of the rounded input surface 37 of the optical conduit 24 comprises a substantially spherical configuration or partial spherical section. Rounded configurations having the shape of a substantially spherical section may have a radius of curvature R of about 300 microns to about 900 microns for some embodiments.
The input surface 37 of the optical conduit 24 is operatively coupled to an output axis and focal region of the focusing optic 32. The input surface 37 may be configured with a convex cylindrical lens element 88 substantially centered on the input surface 37. The cylindrical lens element 88 may have a radius of curvature R which lies substantially in a plane defined by the beams 46 incident on the input surface 37 of the optical conduit 24. This arrangement may be desirable in that the effectiveness of the far field pattern homogenization may require proper rotational orientation of the optical conduit 24 and input surface 37 thereof for such a cylindrical lens element 88. For some embodiments, a longitudinal axis of an imaginary cylinder (not shown) that fits to the surface of the cylindrical lens element 88 is perpendicular to the plane formed by the converging beamlett axes 44 of beams 46 impinging on the optical conduit input surface 37. In particular, if the radius of curvature R of the cylindrical lens element does not lie substantially in the plane defined by the plurality of converging focused beams incident on the input surface, the input surface 37 may not be effective in homogenizing the far field pattern 10 from the optical conduit 24. For some embodiments, the cylindrical lens element 88 of the input surface 37 may have a radius of curvature of about 0.2 mm to about 1.5 mm.
For some embodiments, the convex cylindrical lens element 88 of the input surface 37 of the optical conduit 24 may be formed from material of the transmitting core of the optical conduit 24. For some embodiments, the convex cylindrical lens element 88 of the input surface 37 of the optical conduit 24 may be formed from material separate from the transmitting core 68 and is secured in operative arrangement to the transmitting core 68. In some instances, the convex cylindrical lens element 88 of the input surface 37 of the optical conduit 24 may have a radius of curvature R of about 300 microns to about 900 microns for some embodiments.
The optical conduit 24 includes an input surface 37 which is operatively coupled to an output axis and focal region of the focusing optic 32. The input surface 37 includes a concave cylindrical lens element 90 substantially centered on the input surface 37 and having a radius of curvature R lying substantially in a plane defined by the beams 46 incident on the optical conduit 24. In some instances, the concave cylindrical lens element 90 may have a focal length of about 0.2 mm to about 1.5 mm. For some embodiments, the concave cylindrical lens element 90 of the input surface 37 of the optical conduit 24 may be formed into the material of the transmitting core 68 of the optical conduit 24. For some embodiments, the concave cylindrical lens element 90 of the input surface 37 of the optical conduit 24 may be formed into material separate from the transmitting core 68 and may be secured in operative arrangement to the transmitting core 68. In some instances, the concave cylindrical lens element 90 of the input surface 37 of the optical conduit 24 may have a radius of curvature R of about 300 microns to about 900 microns for some embodiments.
Another means for homogenizing the far field pattern 10 of the output of an optical conduit 24 fed with light having discrete input launch angles is to shift the position of hot spots in the far field onto cooler spots or vice versa.
An optical conduit 24 may be included in the system 20 that has a transmitting core 68 with an input surface 37 which is operatively coupled to an output axis and focal region of the focusing optic 32. An optical shift element 102 may be disposed generally between the plurality of emitters 42 and focusing optic 32 or any other suitable location. The optical shift element 102 may be configured to shift the optical axes 44 of the output beams 46 which are on one side of the center output axis 62. For some embodiments, the optical shift element 102 may include a block having a desired thickness and parallel input and output surfaces. The optical shift element 102 may also include a wedge. The optical shift element 102 may be made of a refractive or transmissive optical material such as glass, silica, solid state materials or the like. For some embodiments, the optical shift element 102 may have an input surface 104 which is parallel or substantially parallel to an output surface 106. In some instances, the optical shift element block embodiment 102 may have a thickness of about 0.5 mm to about 2 mm.
As can be seen in the illustration of
Another embodiment of a means for homogenizing a far field beam pattern 10 from the output of an optical conduit 24 of an optical system 20 may include devices and methods for beam expansion. Beam expansion devices, such as telescopes, may be used to expand each beam 46 from the laser emitter bar 22 to contact or overlap adjacent beams 46 prior to focusing of the beams 46 into the optical conduit 24.
The focal lengths of the convex input lens 114 and convex output lens 116 and separation of these lenses may be configured to expand each respective beam 46 to the lateral boundaries of the telescope structure. The telescopes 112 may also be configured to expand each beam 46 so as to contact, nearly contact or overlap adjacent beams 46 as shown by the beam ray trace in
Some system embodiments 20 include a plurality of linearly spaced emitters 42 configured to generate a respective plurality of substantially parallel equally spaced output beams 46. The output beams 46 may be configured to propagate along output axes 44 of the respective emitters 42 in a symmetrical distribution about a center output axis 62 of a center emitter. A focusing optic 32 may be operatively coupled to the plurality of emitters 42 and configured to focus or otherwise condense the plurality of substantially parallel output beams 46 from the emitters 42. An optical conduit 24 having a transmitting core 68 that includes an input surface 37 which is operatively coupled to an output axis and focal region of the focusing optic 32 may also be included in the incorporated system 20. The telescope array 110 may be disposed in operative arrangement within an optical train of the optical system 20 between the plurality of linearly spaced emitters 42 and the focusing optic 32. The telescope array 110 may be configured to expand each beam 46 from the laser emitter bar 22 to contact or overlap adjacent beams 46 prior to focusing of the beams 46 into the optical conduit 24. Some system embodiments also include a fast axis collimator 26, a slow axis collimator 28 or both which may be operatively coupled to the beam axes 44. The fast axis collimator 26 may be configured to substantially collimate the output of each emitter in a fast axis direction and the slow axis collimator 28 may be configured to substantially collimate the output of each emitter 42 in a slow axis direction.
Generally, the telescope array 110 may be positioned within the optical train of an optical system 20, such as the optical system 20 illustrated in
With regard to the above detailed description, like reference numerals used therein refer to like elements that may have the same or similar dimensions, materials and configurations. While particular forms of embodiments have been illustrated and described, it will be apparent that various modifications can be made without departing from the spirit and scope of the embodiments of the invention. Accordingly, it is not intended that the invention be limited by the forgoing detailed description.
This application is a national stage application under 35 U.S.C. section 371 of International Patent Application No. PCT/US2011/021931, filed Jan. 20, 2011, entitled “HOMOGENIZATION OF FAR FIELD FIBER COUPLED RADIATION,” naming Sang-Ki Park, Edmund L. Wolak, John Kelly Johnson, and Serge Cutillas as inventors, which claims priority under 35 U.S.C. section 119(e) from U.S. Provisional Application No. 61/297,700, filed Jan. 22, 2010, entitled “HOMOGENIZATION OF FAR FIELD FIBER COUPLED RADIATION,” naming Sang-Ki Park, Edmund L. Wolak, John Kelly Johnson, and Serge Cutillas as inventors, both of which are incorporated by reference herein in their entirety.
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind | 371c Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
PCT/US2011/021931 | 1/20/2011 | WO | 00 | 11/14/2012 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2011/091170 | 7/28/2011 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4428647 | Sprague | Jan 1984 | A |
4535773 | Yoon | Aug 1985 | A |
4763975 | Scifres et al. | Aug 1988 | A |
4910539 | Mathis et al. | Mar 1990 | A |
5049981 | Dahringer | Sep 1991 | A |
5127068 | Baer | Jun 1992 | A |
5144486 | Hart | Sep 1992 | A |
5168401 | Endriz | Dec 1992 | A |
5230969 | Savant et al. | Jul 1993 | A |
5243619 | Albers et al. | Sep 1993 | A |
5334150 | Kaali | Aug 1994 | A |
5365366 | Kafka et al. | Nov 1994 | A |
5367529 | Holsinger et al. | Nov 1994 | A |
5381859 | Minakami et al. | Jan 1995 | A |
5446749 | Nighan et al. | Aug 1995 | A |
5513201 | Yamaguchi | Apr 1996 | A |
5562696 | Nobles et al. | Oct 1996 | A |
5579422 | Head et al. | Nov 1996 | A |
5691989 | Rakuljic et al. | Nov 1997 | A |
5740288 | Pan | Apr 1998 | A |
5740292 | Strasser | Apr 1998 | A |
5787107 | Leger | Jul 1998 | A |
5808323 | Spaeth | Sep 1998 | A |
5825551 | Clarkson | Oct 1998 | A |
5832150 | Flint | Nov 1998 | A |
5848083 | Haden et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
5986794 | Krause | Nov 1999 | A |
5993073 | Hamakawa et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
5999544 | Petersen | Dec 1999 | A |
6044096 | Wolak et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6064515 | Yang | May 2000 | A |
6084895 | Kouchi et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6107113 | Harmand et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6160664 | Du et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6175452 | Ullmann et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6185235 | Cheng et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6215598 | Hwu | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6314116 | Wright et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6324326 | Dejneka et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6331692 | Krause et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6335822 | Toyohara | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6337873 | Goering et al. | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6356380 | Whitney | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6356577 | Miller | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6384896 | Tatsukuki | May 2002 | B1 |
6389198 | Kafka et al. | May 2002 | B2 |
6396857 | Labranche et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6428217 | Giltner | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6448801 | Dischiano | Sep 2002 | B2 |
6493148 | Anikitchev | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6504858 | Cheng et al. | Jan 2003 | B2 |
6516011 | Treusch | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6559879 | Kobayashi et al. | May 2003 | B1 |
6594092 | von Freyhold et al. | Jul 2003 | B2 |
6600605 | Anikitchev | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6643302 | Nishikawa et al. | Nov 2003 | B1 |
6736554 | Kerboeuf et al. | May 2004 | B2 |
6768593 | Jutamulia | Jul 2004 | B1 |
6771686 | Ullman et al. | Aug 2004 | B1 |
6778732 | Fermann | Aug 2004 | B1 |
6804277 | Kimura et al. | Oct 2004 | B2 |
6822978 | Kafka et al. | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6831778 | Yang et al. | Dec 2004 | B2 |
6876784 | Nikolov et al. | Apr 2005 | B2 |
6882664 | Bolshtyansky et al. | Apr 2005 | B2 |
6888679 | Brown | May 2005 | B2 |
6891876 | Sutter et al. | May 2005 | B2 |
6897486 | Loh | May 2005 | B2 |
6898231 | Butterworth | May 2005 | B2 |
6919990 | Anikitchev et al. | Jul 2005 | B2 |
6922288 | Yamanaka et al. | Jul 2005 | B2 |
6922419 | Nighan et al. | Jul 2005 | B1 |
6931037 | Nighan et al. | Aug 2005 | B2 |
6969206 | Iwanaga et al. | Nov 2005 | B2 |
6977769 | Matsushita et al. | Dec 2005 | B2 |
6985648 | Kish et al. | Jan 2006 | B2 |
6993059 | Anikitchev et al. | Jan 2006 | B2 |
7006194 | Sumiyoshi et al. | Feb 2006 | B2 |
7006549 | Anikitchev et al. | Feb 2006 | B2 |
7010194 | Anikitchev et al. | Mar 2006 | B2 |
7027228 | Mikhalov | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7065105 | Ehlers et al. | Jun 2006 | B2 |
7244965 | Andrews et al. | Jul 2007 | B2 |
7259907 | Langhans | Aug 2007 | B2 |
7322754 | Wolf et al. | Jan 2008 | B2 |
7372879 | Giaretta et al. | May 2008 | B2 |
7379237 | Di Teodoro et al. | May 2008 | B1 |
7830608 | Hu et al. | Nov 2010 | B2 |
7866897 | Hu et al. | Jan 2011 | B2 |
8644357 | Liu et al. | Feb 2014 | B2 |
20020030200 | Yamaguchi et al. | Mar 2002 | A1 |
20020037142 | Rossi | Mar 2002 | A1 |
20020172475 | Miyazaki et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20030044132 | Nasu et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030048987 | Saito et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030161357 | Bolshtyansky et al. | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20040095983 | Whitley | May 2004 | A1 |
20040114860 | Dultz et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040151431 | Ukrainczyk | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040184753 | Teramura et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040213305 | Nakae et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040252744 | Anikitchev et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20040258117 | Nebel et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050018743 | Volodin et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050069255 | Nishimura et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050105189 | Mikhailov | May 2005 | A1 |
20050207454 | Starodoumov et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050248819 | Hymel et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20050248820 | Moser et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20050257917 | East et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20060018609 | Sonoda et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060039418 | Anikitchev et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060045143 | Anikitchev et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060114955 | Steckman | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060126690 | Kido et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060147158 | Sato | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060176912 | Anikitchev | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060263004 | Klimek et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060274797 | Myers et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20060280209 | Treusch et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20070024959 | Peterson | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070075465 | Taylor et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070223862 | Thyzel | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070263684 | Nolan | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070268571 | Hu et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070268572 | Hu et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070291373 | Hu et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20070291813 | Hu et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20080008216 | Miller et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080008217 | Miller et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080101429 | Sipes | May 2008 | A1 |
20090104727 | Krejci et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090115833 | Soulliaert et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
20090251697 | Cutillas et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090323175 | Mukai et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20100177796 | Miller | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20110051758 | Krejci et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20120177074 | Liu et al. | Jul 2012 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
1611969 | May 2005 | CN |
10 2004 006932 | Oct 2005 | DE |
1 298 460 | Apr 2003 | EP |
05-004112 | Jan 1993 | JP |
09-159880 | Jun 1997 | JP |
411233857 | Aug 1999 | JP |
2001-82269 | Mar 2001 | JP |
2001-343561 | Dec 2001 | JP |
2002-148491 | May 2002 | JP |
2003-131083 | May 2003 | JP |
2003-198051 | Jul 2003 | JP |
2004-022679 | Jan 2004 | JP |
2004-096009 | Mar 2004 | JP |
2005-134916 | May 2005 | JP |
2005-167041 | Jun 2005 | JP |
2006-032352 | Feb 2006 | JP |
2006-171348 | Jun 2006 | JP |
2007-149932 | Jun 2007 | JP |
2007-528509 | Oct 2007 | JP |
2007-298933 | Nov 2007 | JP |
2007-300015 | Nov 2007 | JP |
2009-503596 | Jan 2009 | JP |
2010-175579 | Aug 2010 | JP |
2011-520292 | Jul 2011 | JP |
WO 9949343 | Mar 1999 | WO |
WO-02077698 | Oct 2002 | WO |
WO 2007137005 | Nov 2007 | WO |
WO 2009037555 | Mar 2009 | WO |
WO 2009079567 | Jul 2009 | WO |
WO 2009137703 | Nov 2009 | WO |
WO 2010081092 | Jul 2010 | WO |
WO 2010118290 | Oct 2010 | WO |
WO 2011091170 | Jul 2011 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Andersen et al., “High Repetition Rate Tunable Femtosecond Pulses from Fiber Laser Pumped Parametric Amplifier,” Advanced Solid-State Photonics, ME2, Abstract of Talk 4:30pm Jan. 30, 2006. |
Becht, Vector phase conjugation for beam combining in a pulsed Nd:YAG laser system, Proceedings of the SPIE—The International Society for Optical Engineering, 3263:11-19 (1998). |
Brunner et al., “Powerful red-green-blue laser source pumped with a mode-locked thin disk laser,” Optics Letters 29(16):1921-1923, Aug. 15, 2004. |
Fuhr, Polarization power summing in laser diode communication systems, SPIE 740:70-76 (1987). |
Ghislotti et al., Bidirectional Pumping of Er-Doped Fibers Using Detuned 980-nm Lasers, IEEE Photonics Technology Letters 14(5):780-782 2002. |
Headley et al., Tapered Fiber bundles for combining laser pumps., Proceedings of the SPIE —The International Society for Optical Engineering, 5709(1):263-272 (200). |
Knitsch et al., Diode Laser Modules of Highest Brilliance for Materials Processing, Proceedings of the SPIE, vol. 4651:256-263 (2002). |
Kruglov et al., “Self-similar propagation of parabolic pulses in normal-dispersion fiber amplifiers,” JOSA B, 19(3):461-469 2002. |
Mecherle, Laser diode combining for free space optical communication, Proceedings of the SPIE—The International Society for Optical Engineering, 616:281-291 (1986). |
Miyajima et al., Single Wavelength 5.6 Direct Diode Laser with a High-Efficiency Beam Combination, Jpn. J. Appl. Phys., 43(8):5269-5272 (2004). |
Moser et al., “Volume Bragg Grating Devices,” Friday Morning Optical Fiber Communications Conference, 2003, OFC 2003 pp. 644-645, vol. 2, Mar. 28, 2003. |
Ondax, Inc., “Volume Holographic Gratings (VHG),” 2005 pp. 1-7. |
Piper et al., 1.2 mJ, 37 ns single-moded pulses at 10kHz repetition rate from a Q-switched ytterbium fiber Laser, Abstract, In, Proceedings of CLEO/IQEC May 16-21, 2004: Conference on Lasers and Electro-Optics, Quantum Electronics and Laser Science. USA, Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers. |
Rothenberg, Polarization beam smoothing for ineertial confinement fusion, J. Applied Physics, 87(8):3654-3662 (2000). |
Sincerbox, Laser Beam Combining, IBM Technical Disclosure Bulletin, 12(10):1663-1664 (1970). |
Steinmann et al., “Tunable fs Laser Pulses from OPA with MHz Repetition Rate,” Advanced Solid-State Photonics, TuC6, Abstract of Talk, 12:30pm Jan. 31, 2006. |
Thestrup et al, High brightness laser source based on polarization coupling of two diode lasers with asymmetric feedback, Applied Physics Letters, 82(5):680-682 (2003). |
Tra Fiberoptics, Inc. High-Powered SMA Connectors for Photonic Crystal Fiber. TraTech Fiberoptic, Inc. Brochure; 2004. |
Treusch et al., High-Brightness Semiconductor Laser Sources for Materials Processing: Stacking, Beam Shaping, and Bars, IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Quantum Electronics, 6(4):601-614 (2000). |
Valdor Fiber Optics Catalog #910-00001, pp. 1-2 Impact Mount Singlemode Laser Pigtails, Printed from the internet: Dec. 22, 2006. |
Volodin et al., Wavelength Stabilization and spectrum narrowing of high-power multimode laser diodes and arrays by use of volume Bragg gratings. Optics Letters 29(16): Aug. 15, 2004. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion mailed on: Nov. 26, 2007 for International Application No. PCT/US2007/069717 filed on: May 10, 2007 and published as: WO/2007/137005 on: Nov. 29, 2007. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion mailed on Jul. 24, 2009 for International Application No. PCT/US2008/087198 filed on: Dec. 17, 2008 and published as: WO/2009/079567 on: Jun. 25, 2009. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion mailed on Dec. 28, 2009 for International Application No. PCT/US2009/043182 filed on: May 7, 2009 and published as: WO/2009/137703 on: Nov. 12, 2009. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion mailed on Sep. 30, 2011 for International Application No. PCT/US2011/021931 filed on: Jan. 20, 2011 and published as: WO/2011/091170 on: Jul. 28, 2011. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion mailed on Mar. 17, 2010 for International Application No. PCT/US2010/020647 filed on: Jan. 11, 2010 and published as: WO/2010/081092 on: Jul. 15, 2010. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion mailed on Jun. 7, 2010 for International Application No. PCT/US2010/030486 filed on: Apr. 9, 2010 and published as: WO/2010/118290 on: Oct. 14, 2010. |
Office Action mailed on Jul. 16, 2010 for U.S. Appl. No. 11/747,172, filed May 10, 2007 published as: US 2007/0268571 A1 on Nov. 22, 2007, issued as: 7,830,608 on Nov. 9, 2010. |
Office Action mailed on Dec. 15, 2009 for U.S. Appl. No. 11/747,172, filed May 10, 2007 published as: US 2007/0268571 A1 on Nov. 22, 2007issued as: 7,830,608 on Nov. 9, 2010. |
Office Action mailed on Jul. 24, 2009 for U.S. Appl. No. 11/747,172, filed May 10, 2007 published as: US 2007/0268571 A1 on Nov. 22, 2007issued as: 7,830,608 on Nov. 9, 2010. |
Office Action mailed on Jan. 23, 2009 for U.S. Appl. No. 11/747,172, filed May 10, 2007 published as: US 2007/0268571 A1 on Nov. 22, 2007issued as: 7,830,608 on Nov. 9, 2010. |
Office Action mailed on Jul. 29, 2008 for U.S. Appl. No. 11/747,172, filed May 10, 2007 published as: US 2007/0268571 A1 on Nov. 22, 2007issued as: 7,830,608 on Nov. 9, 2010. |
Office Action mailed on Jul. 8, 2009 for U.S. Appl. No. 11/747,184, filed May 10, 2007 published as: US 2007/0268572 A1 on Nov. 22, 2007. |
Office Action mailed on Dec. 10, 2008 for U.S. Appl. No. 11/747,184, filed May 10, 2007 published as: US 2007/0268572 A1 on Nov. 22, 2007. |
Office Action mailed on Nov. 3, 2009 for U.S. Appl. No. 11/761,901, filed Jun. 12, 2007 published as: US 2007/0291813 A1 on Nov. 22, 2007 and Issued as: 7,680,170 on Mar. 16, 2010. |
Office Action mailed on Aug. 24, 2009 for U.S. Appl. No. 11/761,901, filed Jun. 12, 2007 published as: US 2007/0291813 A1 on Nov. 22, 2007 and Issued as: 7,680,170 on Mar. 16, 2010. |
Office Action mailed on Jul. 17, 2012 for U.S. Appl. No. 12/337,275, filed Dec. 17, 2008 published as: US 2009/251697 A1 on Oct. 8, 2009. |
Office Action mailed on Dec. 22, 2011 for U.S. Appl. No. 12/337,275, filed Dec. 17, 2008 published as: US 2009/251697 A1 on Oct. 8, 2009. |
Office Action mailed on May 11, 2011 for U.S. Appl. No. 12/337,275, filed Dec. 17, 2008 published as: US 2009/251697 A1 on Oct. 8, 2009. |
Office Action mailed on Sep. 23, 2010 for U.S. Appl. No. 11/973,207, filed Oct. 6, 2007 published as: US2008/0131060 A1 on Jun. 5, 2008 and Issued as: 7,866,897 on Jan. 11, 2011. |
Office Action mailed on Feb. 18, 2010 for U.S. Appl. No. 11/973,207, filed Oct. 6, 2007 published as: US2008/0131060 A1 on Jun. 5, 2008 and Issued as: 7,866,897 on Jan. 11, 2011. |
Office Action mailed on Sep. 2, 2009 for U.S. Appl. No. 11/973,207, filed Oct. 6, 2007 published as: US2008/0131060 A1 on Jun. 5, 2008 and Issued as: 7,866,897 on Jan. 11, 2011. |
Office Action mailed on Jan. 26, 2009 for U.S. Appl. No. 11/973,207, filed Oct. 6, 2007 published as: US2008/0131060 A1 on Jun. 5, 2008 and Issued as: 7,866,897 on Jan. 11, 2011. |
Office Action mailed on Jun. 14, 2013 for U.S. Appl. No. 12/337,275, filed Dec. 17, 2008 and published as US 2009/0251697 on Oct. 8, 2009. |
Supplementary European Search Report completed on Jul. 12, 2013 for EP application No. 09743689.3-1564, and published as EP 2 283 549 on Feb. 16, 2011. |
Office Action mailed on May 24, 2013 for U.S. Appl. No. 12/990,215, filed Jan. 12, 2011 and published as US 2011-0103056 on May 5, 2011. |
Office Action mailed on May 17, 2013 for U.S. Appl. No. 13/004,679, filed Jan. 11, 2011 and published as US 2012-0177074 on Jul. 12, 2012. |
Office Action mailed on Sep. 27, 2013 for U.S. Appl. No. 13/004,679, filed Jan. 11, 2011 and published as US 2012-0177074 on Jul. 12, 2012. |
Office Action dated: Mar. 31, 2014 for U.S. Appl. No. 12/990,215 filed Jan. 12, 2011 and published as:2011/0103056 on: May 5, 2011. |
Office Action dated: Dec. 24, 2013 for U.S. Appl. No. 12/990,215 filed Jan. 12, 2011 and published as:2011/0103056 on: May 5, 2011. |
Supplementary European Search Report dated: Mar. 17, 2014 for European Application No. EP08862579 completed Feb. 19, 2014. |
Extended European Search Report dated: May 12, 2015 in European Patent Application No. EP 11735195.7 filed: Jan. 20, 2011. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20130058124 A1 | Mar 2013 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61297700 | Jan 2010 | US |