This application claims priority to German Patent Application DE10340826.6 filed Sep. 4, 2003, the entirety of which is incorporated by reference herein.
This invention relates to a fuel injection device for a gas turbine. More particularly, this invention relates to a fuel injection device for a gas turbine with an airflow passage whose walls are provided with several fuel openings for the injection of fuel into the airflow.
A great variety of methods are used to prepare the fuel-air mixture in gas turbine combustion chambers, with distinction being basically made between their application to stationary gas turbines or aircraft gas turbines and the respective specific requirements.
However, in order to reduce pollutant emissions, in particular nitrogen oxide emissions, the fuel must generally be premixed with as much air as possible to obtain a lean combustion state, i.e. one characterized by air excess. Such a mixture is, however, problematic since it may affect the combustion-stabilizing mechanisms.
Combustion is almost exclusively stabilized by swirling air which enables the partly burnt gases to be re-circulated. Fuel is in many cases introduced centrally by means of a nozzle arranged on the center axis of the atomizer. Here, fuel is in many cases injected into the airflow with considerable overpressure to achieve adequate penetration and premix as much air as possible with fuel. These pressure atomizers are intended to break up the fuel directly. However, some designs of injection nozzles are intended to spray the fuel as completely as possible onto an atomizer lip. The fuel is accelerated on the atomizer lip by the airflow, broken up into fine droplets at the downstream end of this lip and mixed with air.
Another possibility to apply the fuel onto this atomizer lip is by way of a so-called ‘film applicator’, with the fuel being distributed as uniformly as possible as a film.
A further possibility to mix the fuel with maximum intensity with a great quantity of air is by de-central injection from the outer rim of the flow passage which carries the major quantity of air. This can be accomplished from an atomizer lip, but also from the outer nozzle contour. Different to the film applicator, this type of injection is characterized by a defined penetration of the fuel into the main airflow.
Both the injection of fuel by means of a central nozzle or a pressure atomizer and the introduction as a film by way of a film applicator are to be optimized such that a maximum amount of the air passing the atomizer, if possible the entire air, is homogeneously mixed with fuel prior to combustion. Characteristic of a low-pollutant, in particular, low-nitrogen oxide combustion, is the preparation of a lean fuel-air mixture, i.e. one premixed with air excess. The consequence of this is fuel nozzles whose flow areas are large enough to enable the high quantity of air to be premixed with fuel. Due to the size of these fuel nozzles and, if central injection is used, the limited ability of the fuel jets or sprays to penetrate the constantly increasing sizes of air passages and produce a homogenous distribution of the fuel-air mixture, novel concepts of fuel injection and pre-mixture are required.
Homogenous distribution and introduction of fuel in large airflow passages calls for de-central injection from a maximum number of fuel openings to be arranged on the airflow passage walls. Due to their great number, however, the openings will be very small, as a result of which they may be blocked or clogged by contaminated fuel. Since these burners are frequently cut in at higher engine loads, blockage may also be caused by fuel degradation products if, after intermediate or high-load operation, burner operation via these fuel openings is cut out and the fuel remaining in the fuel nozzle is heated up and degraded. Typical of the fuel nozzles is, in many cases, a very irregular velocity and mass flow distribution in the radial direction. Due to the swirling air, which is required to stabilize the subsequent combustion, the local airflows are at maximum in the area of the radially outer limiting wall. If fuel is introduced into the airflow via a small number of openings, the circumferential homogeneity of the fuel in the air is, on the one hand, affected and, on the other hand, the fuel can penetrate very deeply into the flow and mix and vaporize in regions in which air is not sufficiently available. This may occur, in particular, with de-central injection, as described above.
The present invention, in a broad aspect, provides a fuel injection device of the type discussed above which, while being simply designed and reliable, avoids disadvantages of the state of the art and ensures an optimized mixture of fuel and air.
It is a particular object of the present invention to provide solution to the above problems by a combination of the features described herein. Further advantageous embodiments of the present invention will be apparent from the description below.
Accordingly, the present invention provides for an inclination of the center axes of the fuel openings at least in the circumferential direction.
Firstly, the present invention eliminates the disadvantages resulting from a small number of fuel openings. The disadvantages of the state of the art are the irregular fuel distribution in the circumferential direction of the fuel nozzle and an excessive depth of penetration of the fuel into the main flow. Secondly, the present invention eliminates the need for a high number of very small fuel openings which, due to their size, are susceptible to clogging. The present invention accordingly provides for a technically feasible fuel supply arrangement which, while featuring a small number of fuel openings, ensures good homogeneity of the air-fuel mixing process.
The present invention, therefore, provides for the introduction of fuel from the outer rim into the airflow via a small number of circumferentially inclined openings. The swirl of the fuel, which can be introduced by the principle of co-rotation or contra-rotation in relation to the swirled airflow, enables the fuel to penetrate, through relatively large openings, to a penetration depth in the air zones which is defined by the swirl and produce a mixture of maximum homogeneity. Since the regions of high air velocity and, therefore, high local air mass flows occur in the wall-near area of the outer wall of the swirled airflow, both, the number of fuel openings is reduced and the penetration depth controlled.
The center axes of the fuel openings may additionally also be inclined in the axial direction.
The advantage of the present invention is a practical solution to the problem of homogeneously premixing fuel with air while achieving a defined, not too deep penetration of the fuel into the airflow with a minimum number of relatively large fuel openings. The general object is the reduction of the nitrogen oxide emission of the gas turbine combustion chamber by means of a robust, technically implementable fuel injection configuration.
The present invention is more fully described in light of the accompanying drawings showing preferred embodiments. In the drawings,
The present invention is not confined to the embodiments shown; rather, the inclination angle of the center axes 4 of the fuel openings 3 is variable in the framework of the present invention, either individually, or in one or more groups. This applies similarly to the number and the diameters of the fuel openings 3 as well as to the corresponding fuel passages. Within the present invention, several inventive fuel injection arrangements can be provided in axial stagger, which can also be combined relative to each other in counter-direction of injection. Furthermore, the present invention is combinable with a great variety of other forms of fuel injection.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
103 40 826 | Sep 2003 | DE | national |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3091283 | Kidwell | May 1963 | A |
3703259 | Sturgess et al. | Nov 1972 | A |
3930369 | Verdouw | Jan 1976 | A |
3955361 | Schirmer | May 1976 | A |
3980233 | Simmons | Sep 1976 | A |
4141213 | Ross | Feb 1979 | A |
4218020 | Reider | Aug 1980 | A |
4425755 | Hughes | Jan 1984 | A |
4974416 | Taylor | Dec 1990 | A |
5303554 | Faulkner | Apr 1994 | A |
5351475 | Ansart | Oct 1994 | A |
5373693 | Zarzalis | Dec 1994 | A |
5479781 | Fric et al. | Jan 1996 | A |
5673551 | Doebbeling | Oct 1997 | A |
5799872 | Nesbitt et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5816049 | Joshi | Oct 1998 | A |
5822992 | Dean | Oct 1998 | A |
5966937 | Graves | Oct 1999 | A |
6067790 | Choi et al. | May 2000 | A |
6119459 | Gomez | Sep 2000 | A |
6152726 | Ruck | Nov 2000 | A |
6655145 | Boardman | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6799427 | Calvez | Oct 2004 | B2 |
6820411 | Pederson et al. | Nov 2004 | B2 |
7065972 | Zupanc et al. | Jun 2006 | B2 |
20030093997 | Stalder | May 2003 | A1 |
20040003596 | Chin | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040040311 | Doerr et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
3913124 | Jun 1989 | DE |
4316474 | Nov 1994 | DE |
0994300 | Apr 2000 | EP |
1420027 | Jan 1976 | GB |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20050050895 A1 | Mar 2005 | US |