Honeycomb structure

Abstract

A honeycomb structure includes a porous partition wall defining a plurality of cells, wherein the plurality of cells include a first cell and a second cell, on the partition wall disposed to surround the at least one first cell, a protrusion is each provided with, the first protrusion and the second protrusion are each disposed to at least partially overlap with each other on extended lines in extending directions of the respective protrusions, and an inter-protrusion length (X) of a distal end of the first protrusion and a distal end of the second protrusion is equal to or more than 10% and equal to or less than 70% with respect to a mutual distance (W) from the one part to the other part on the partition walls facing each other.

Description

The present application is an application based on JP-2017-068294 filed on Mar. 30, 2017 with Japan Patent Office, the entire contents of which are incorporated herein by reference.

BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

Field of the Invention

The present invention relates to a honeycomb structure. More particularly, the present invention relates to a honeycomb structure capable of reducing a pressure loss and improving trap efficiency when being used as a filter.

Description of the Related Art

Conventionally, as a device for trapping particulate matters in exhaust gas emitted from an internal combustion engine such as a diesel engine or for purifying toxic gas components such as CO, HC, and NOx, a filter using a honeycomb structure has been known. The honeycomb structure is a structure having porous partition walls disposed to surround a plurality of cells which are a fluid channel. The partition walls configuring the honeycomb structure are made of, for example, porous ceramics such as cordierite and silicon carbide. Hereinafter, the particulate matter may be referred to as “PM”. The PM stands for “particulate matter”.

In the filter using the honeycomb structure, a plugging portion is disposed in an open end on any one of the cells partitioned by the porous partition walls, and the PM contained in the exhaust gas is removed by the porous partition walls. Hereinafter, the filter using the honeycomb structure may be referred to as a “honeycomb filter”. For example, the honeycomb filter has a structure in which an open end on an inflow end face side and an open end on an outflow end face for the plurality of cells are plugged to each other, and therefore the porous partition wall serves as a filter for removing PM. In such a honeycomb filter, if exhaust gas containing PM is introduced from the inflow end face, the PM contained in the exhaust gas is trapped by the porous partition wall when the exhaust gas passes through the porous partition wall. By doing so, the exhaust gas emitted from the outflow end face of the honeycomb filter becomes gas from which the PM is removed. In addition, it has been known that the honeycomb filter can purify toxic gas components in the exhaust gas by a catalyst loaded in pores on the partition walls.

When the honeycomb filter is used for a long period of time, ash or the like in the exhaust gas is deposited in a cell (hereinafter, referred to as “inflow cell”) in which the inflow end face side is open, and as a result the pressure loss may be suddenly increased. As a measure to prevent such a phenomenon, efforts have been made to increase a filtration area or an open frontal area in the inflow cell. Specifically, the structure in which cross-sectional shapes orthogonal to extending directions of the inflow cell and the outflow cell are different has been proposed (for example, Patent Document 1). Such a structure may be referred to as, for example, an HAC structure. The HAC structure stands for a “high ash capacity structure”. In addition, the above-described outflow cell is a “cell in which the outflow end face side is open”.

[Patent Document 1] JP-A-2004-896

SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

However, in the honeycomb filter as described in Patent Document 1, the exhaust gas passing through the partition wall tends to concentrate in the vicinity of the outflow end face side. For this reason, there is a problem in that a wall passage flow velocity at which the exhaust gas passes through the partition wall is increased in the vicinity of the outflow end face side of the honeycomb filter and the pressure loss of the honeycomb filter is increased. In addition, there is a problem in that if the exhaust gas passing through the partition wall concentrates in the vicinity of the outflow end face side, the trap performance of the honeycomb filter deteriorates.

Here, the problem of the above-described wall passage flow velocity tends to be improved by making an open frontal area OFA_IN of the inflow cell smaller than an open frontal area OFA_OUT of the outflow cell (i.e., OFA_IN<OFA_OUT). However, when the improvement is attempted by such a method, the inflow cell has a problem in that the pressure loss may be increased due to a reduction in a deposition capacity for depositing ash or the like or a reduction in a geometric surface area on the inflow end face side. Hereinafter, the geometric surface area may be referred to as “GSA”. The GSA stands for “geometric surface area”. Similarly, the problem of the wall passage flow velocity tends to be improved by making a hydraulic diameter HD_IN of the inflow cell smaller than a hydraulic diameter HD_OUT of the outflow cell (i.e., HD_IN<HD_OUT). Even in this case, however, when the ash or the like is deposited in the inflow cell, the pressure loss may be increased.

The present invention has been made considering the problems of the prior art. An object of the present invention is to provide a honeycomb structure capable of reducing a pressure loss and improving trap efficiency.

According to the present invention, a honeycomb structure shown below is provided.

According to a first aspect of the present invention, the honeycomb structure is provided includes a porous partition wall defining a plurality of cells which become a fluid channel extending from a first end face to a second end face,

• • wherein the plurality of cells include a first cell in which an end portion on the first end face side is open and an end portion on the second end face side is plugged and a second cell in which the end portion on the first end face side is plugged and the end portion on the second end face side is open,
  • the honeycomb structure is configured to pass the fluid introduced from the first end face side through the partition wall to emit the fluid into the second cell as a filtration fluid and emit the filtration fluid from the second end face side,
  • in a cross section orthogonal to an extending direction of the cell, the first cell is disposed around the second cell,
  • an open frontal area of the first cell on the first end face is larger than that of the second cell on the second end face,
  • on the partition wall disposed to surround the at least one first cell, opposed parts having the first cell sandwiched therebetween are each provided with a protrusion which protrudes into the first cell,
  • among the two protrusions disposed at the opposed parts on the partition wall, the protrusion disposed on one part on the partition wall is defined as a first protrusion and the protrusion disposed at the other part on the partition wall is defined as a second protrusion,
  • the first protrusion and the second protrusion are each disposed to at least partially overlap with each other on extended lines in extending directions of the respective protrusions, and
  • an inter-protrusion length X of a distal end of the first protrusion and a distal end of the second protrusion is equal to or more than 10% and equal to or less than 70% with respect to a mutual distance W from the one part to the other part on the partition walls facing each other.

According to a second aspect of the present invention, the honeycomb structure according to the first aspect is provided, wherein a protrusion height H1 of the first protrusion is equal to or more than 15% and equal to or less than 45% with respect to the mutual distance W of the partition walls facing each other, and

• • a protrusion height H2 of the second protrusion is equal to or more than 15% and equal to or less than 45% with respect to the mutual distance W of the partition walls facing each other.

According to a third aspect of the present invention, the honeycomb structure according to the first or second aspects is provided, wherein a total sum of the protrusion height H1 of the first protrusion and the protrusion height H2 of the second protrusion is equal to or more than 30% and equal to or less than 90% with respect to the mutual distance W of the partition walls facing each other.

According to a fourth aspect of the present invention, the honeycomb structure according to any one of the first to thirds aspects is provided, wherein a width Y1 of the first protrusion is smaller than a thickness T1 of the partition wall at the one part at which the first protrusion is provided, and

• • a width Y2 of the second protrusion is smaller than a thickness T2 of the partition wall at the other part at which the second protrusion is provided.

According to a fifth aspect of the present invention, the honeycomb structure according to any one of the first to fourth aspects is provided, wherein the total number of protrusions protruding into the one first cell is equal to or less than 4.

According to a sixth aspect of the present invention, the honeycomb structure according to any one of the first to fifth aspects is provided, wherein, the number of combinations of the two protrusions disposed at the opposed parts on the partition wall is equal to or less than 2 within the one first cell.

The honeycomb structure according to the present invention can reduce the pressure loss and improve the trap efficiency. For example, it is possible to increase the channel resistance of the first cell while maintaining the open frontal area OFA_IN of the first cell which is the inflow cell, the geometric surface area (GSA), the hydraulic diameter HD_IN, or the like to some extent by installing the protrusion in the first cell which is the inflow cell. For this reason, when the first end face of the honeycomb structure is the inflow end face, it is possible to increase the channel resistance of the first cell and adjust the exhaust gas passing through the inside of the first cell to pass through the partition wall at the position near the first end face. Therefore, according to the honeycomb structure of the present invention, it is possible to achieve the effect of maintaining the wall passage flow velocity more uniformly, suppressing the increase in the pressure loss, and suppressing the reduction in the trap efficiency, in the extending direction of the cell. Due to the above-described effects, since the open frontal area OFA_IN of the first cell which is the inflow cell need not be greatly reduced, it is possible to effectively secure even the deposition capacity for depositing ash or the like.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

FIG. 1 is a perspective view schematically showing a honeycomb structure according to an embodiment of the present invention as viewed from a first end face side;

FIG. 2 is a plane view schematically showing a first end face of the honeycomb structure shown in FIG. 1;

FIG. 3 is a plane view schematically showing a second end face of the honeycomb structure shown in FIG. 1;

FIG. 4 is a cross-sectional view schematically showing a cross section taken along line A-A′ of FIG. 2;

FIG. 5 is an enlarged plane view of a part of a first end face shown in FIG. 2;

FIGS. 6A to 6C are schematic diagrams for explaining a shape of a protrusion protruding into a first cell;

FIGS. 7A to 7C are schematic diagrams for explaining another shape of the protrusion protruding into the first cell;

FIG. 8 is a schematic diagram for explaining an example of two protrusions disposed at opposed parts on a partition wall;

FIG. 9 is a schematic diagram for explaining another example of the two protrusions disposed at the opposed parts on the partition wall;

FIG. 10 is a schematic diagram for explaining an example of two protrusions which do not face each other;

FIG. 11 is a schematic diagram for explaining another example of the two protrusions which do not face each other;

FIG. 12 is an enlarged plane view of a part of the first end face for explaining an example of the protrusion;

FIG. 13 is an enlarged plane view of a part of the first end face for explaining another example of the protrusion;

FIG. 14 is an enlarged plane view of a part of the first end face for explaining another example of the protrusion;

FIG. 15 is an enlarged plane view of a part of the first end face for explaining another example of the protrusion;

FIG. 16 is an enlarged plane view of a part of the first end face for explaining another example of the protrusion;

FIG. 17 is a schematic diagram for explaining a shape of a cell on a first end face side in a honeycomb structure according to another embodiment of the present invention;

FIG. 18 is a schematic diagram for explaining a shape of a cell on a first end face side in a honeycomb structure according to still another embodiment of the present invention; and

FIG. 19 is a schematic diagram for explaining a shape of a cell on a first end face side in a honeycomb structure according to still another embodiment of the present invention.

DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS

Hereinafter, embodiments of the present invention will be described, but the present invention is not limited to the following embodiments. Therefore, it should be understood that appropriate changes, improvements and the like of the following embodiments based on the ordinary knowledge of those skilled in the art fall within the scope of the present invention without deviating from the purposes of the present invention.

(1) Honeycomb Structure:

As shown in FIGS. 1 to 4, according to a first embodiment of the present invention, a honeycomb structure 100 includes a porous partition wall 1. The honeycomb structure 100 has a pillar shape which has a first end face 11 and a second end face 12. The honeycomb structure 100 shown in FIGS. 1 to 4 further includes a circumferential wall 3 which is disposed to surround the porous partition wall 1. FIG. 1 is a perspective view schematically showing a honeycomb structure according to an embodiment of the present invention as viewed from a first end face side. FIG. 2 is a plane view schematically showing the first end face of the honeycomb structure shown in FIG. 1. FIG. 3 is a plane view schematically showing the second end face of the honeycomb structure shown in FIG. 1. FIG. 4 is a cross-sectional view schematically showing a cross section taken along line A-A′ of FIG. 2.

For example, the honeycomb structure 100 is used as a filter for purifying exhaust gas. In this case, the first end face 11 is an inflow end face into which the exhaust gas is introduced. The second end face 12 is an outflow end face from which the exhaust gas is emitted. That is, the honeycomb structure 100 of the present embodiment is configured to pass a fluid introduced from the first end face 11 side, for example, the exhaust gas through the partition wall 1 to emit the fluid into a second cell 2b as a filtration fluid and emit the filtration fluid from the second end face 12 side. Hereinafter, the first end face 11 may be referred to as an inflow end face and the second end face 12 may be referred to as an outflow end face.

The porous partition wall 1 defines a plurality of cells 2 serving as a fluid channel extending from the first end face 11 to the second end face 12. That is, the plurality of cells 2 are surrounded by the partition wall 1 to form the fluid channel.

The plurality of cells 2 include a first cell 2a in which an end portion on the first end face 11 side is open and an end portion on the second end face 12 side is plugged and a second cell 2b in which an end portion on the first end face 11 side is plugged and an end portion on the second end face 12 side is open. In the case in which the first end face 11 is the inflow end face, the first cell 2a is a cell 2 into which unpurified exhaust gas is introduced, that is, an inflow cell 2_IN. In the case in which the first end face 11 is the inflow end face, the second cell 2b is the cell 2 from which purified exhaust gas (that is, purified gas) is emitted, that is, an outflow cell 2_OUT. The plugging at the end faces of each cell 2 is performed by plugging portions 5 which are disposed at opening end portions of each cell 2.

The first cell 2a is disposed around the second cell 2b in a cross section orthogonal to an extending direction of the cell 2 of the honeycomb structure 100. That is, the plurality of first cells 2a are disposed around one second cell 2b and disposed to surround the second cell 2b. To be sure, a space between the second cell 2b and the first cell 2a is partitioned by the porous partition wall 1.

As shown in FIGS. 2 and 3, according to the honeycomb structure 100 of the present embodiment, in the cross section orthogonal to the extending direction of the cell 2, the shape of the first cell 2a (inflow cell 2_IN) is hexagonal, and the shape of the second cell 2b (outflow cell 2_OUT) is quadrangular. Four first cells 2a are disposed around the quadrangular second cell 2b. It should be noted that in the cross section orthogonal to the extending direction of the cell 2, the shape of each cell 2 is not limited to the above-described shape.

An open frontal area OFA_IN of the first cell 2a on the first end face 11 is larger than an open frontal area OFA_OUT of the second cell 2b on the second end face 12. That is, the honeycomb structure 100 of the present embodiment satisfies the following Formula (1). In the following Formula (1), the “OFA_IN” represents the open frontal area of the first cell 2a on the first end face 11, and the “OFA_OUT” represents the open frontal area of the second cell 2b on the second end face 12. By such a configuration, the honeycomb structure 100 of the present embodiment can reduce a pressure loss when being used as a filter. It should be noted that the “open frontal area OFA_IN of the first cell 2a on the first end face 11” is a percentage (A1_all/S1×100) of a ratio of a total sum area A1_all of the open end of the first cell 2a on the first end face 11 to the area S1 of the first end face 11. The “total sum area A1_all of the open end of the first cell 2a” is the total area obtained by adding up the areas of the open ends of all the first cells 2a on the first end face 11. The “open frontal area OFA_OUT of the second cell 2b on the second end face 12” is a percentage (A2_all/S2×100) of a ratio of a total sum area A2_all of the open end of the second cell 2b on the second end face 12 to the area S2 of the second end face 12. The “total sum area A2_all of the open end of the second cell 2b” is the total area obtained by adding up the areas of the open end of all the second cells 2b on the second end face 12.OFA_IN>OFA_OUT  Formula 1:

As shown in FIG. 5, in the honeycomb structure 100 of the present embodiment, on the partition wall 1 disposed to surround at least one first cell 2a, opposed parts having the first cell 2a sandwiched therebetween are each provided with protrusions 6 and 6 which protrude into the first cell 2a. FIG. 5 is an enlarged plane view of a part of the first end face 11 shown in FIG. 2. It should be noted that FIGS. 1 to 4 are drawn in a state in which the protrusions 6 disposed on the partition wall 1 are omitted.

Here, as shown in FIG. 5, among the two protrusions 6 and 6 disposed at the opposed parts on the partition wall 1, the protrusion 6 disposed at one part on the partition wall 1 is defined as a first protrusion 6a, and the protrusion 6 disposed at the other part on the partition wall 1 is defined as a second protrusion 6b. At this time, the first protrusion 6a and the second protrusion 6b are disposed so that the first protrusion 6a and the second protrusion 6b are each disposed to at least partially overlap with each other on extended lines in the extending directions of the respective protrusions 6a and 6b. Hereinafter, the first protrusion 6a and the second protrusion 6b are simply referred to as the protrusions 6a and 6b.

Here, the state in which the “first protrusion 6a and the second protrusion 6b are each disposed to at least partially overlap with each other on the extended lines in the extending directions of the respective protrusions 6a and 6b” is described with reference to FIGS. 8 and 9. FIG. 8 is a schematic diagram for explaining an example of the two protrusions 6a and 6b disposed at the opposed parts on the partition wall 1. FIG. 9 is a schematic diagram for explaining another example of the two protrusions 6a and 6b disposed at the opposed parts on the partition wall 1.

First of all, the “extending direction of the protrusion 6” is described with reference to FIG. 8. The extending direction of the protrusion 6 means an extending direction of a line segment which connects a middle point P1 of a bottom portion of the protrusion 6 to a middle point P2 of a width of the protrusion 6 at a half position of a height H of the protrusion 6. Therefore, the “extending direction of the protrusion 6” does not necessarily pass through a distal end of the protrusion 6. In the following, an angle formed by the “extending direction of the protrusion 6” and the “extending direction of the partition wall 1 on which the protrusion 6 is disposed” may be represented as an angle defining the “extending direction of the protrusion 6”. Here, the “extending direction of the partition wall 1 on which the protrusion 6 is disposed” means a direction along a surface of the partition wall 1 which is in contact with the bottom portion of the protrusion 6. For example, in FIG. 8, the angle formed by the “extending direction of the protrusion 6” and the “extending direction of the partition wall 1 on which the protrusion 6 is disposed” is 90°. Therefore, it can be said that the extending direction of the protrusion 6 shown in FIG. 8 is 90°. In the partition wall 1 which is in contact with the bottom portion of the protrusion 6, when the “extending direction of the partition wall 1 which is in contact with a bottom portion on one edge side” and the “extending direction of the partition wall 1 which is in contact with a bottom portion on the other edge side” are different from each other, two angles formed by the extending directions of the protrusion 6 may be obtained. In such a case, the angle of the side having the smaller of the two angles formed by the extending directions of the protrusions 6 is defined as the “extending direction of the protrusion 6”.

The “first protrusion 6a and the second protrusion 6b are each disposed to at least partially overlap with each other on the extended lines in the extending directions of the respective protrusions 6a and 6b” means the following state. First, in relation to the protrusion 6a, the width of the bottom portion of the protrusion 6a extends in the extending direction of the protrusion 6a. In the case in which at least a part of the other protrusion 6b exists on an extended point in the extending direction, the protrusion 6a overlaps with the protrusion 6b on the extended line in the extending direction thereof. Similarly, in relation to the other protrusion 6b, the width of the bottom portion of the protrusion 6b extends in the extending direction of the protrusion 6b. In the case in which at least a part of the protrusion 6a exists on the extended point in the extending direction, the protrusion 6b overlaps with the protrusion 6a on the extended line in the extending direction thereof. As described above, when each of the two protrusions 6a and 6b is viewed, this means the state in which the other protrusions 6a and 6b disposed opposite to each other exist on the extended lines in the respective extending directions.

For example, as shown in FIG. 9, even when the extending direction of the protrusions 6a and 6b is not perpendicular to the bottom portions of the protrusions 6a and 6b, similarly to FIG. 8, it is possible to perform a determination on whether or not the protrusions 6a and 6b overlap with each other.

For example, in the state shown in FIGS. 10 and 11, protrusions 106a and 106b each do not overlap with each other. For example, in FIG. 10, two protrusions 106a and 106b is disposed to protrude from a surface of partition walls 101 into a cell 102. The protrusion 106b does not exist on an extended line in an extending direction of the protrusion 106a, and the protrusion 106a does not also exist on an extended line in an extending direction of the protrusion 106b. Similarly, even in FIG. 11, the protrusion 106b does not exist on the extended line in the extending direction of the protrusion 106a, and the protrusion 106a does not also exist on the extended line in the extending direction of the protrusion 106b. FIG. 10 is a schematic diagram for explaining an example of the two protrusions which do not face each other. FIG. 11 is a schematic diagram for explaining another example of the two protrusions which do not face each other.

Since the protrusions 106a and 106b in the state as shown in FIGS. 10 and 11 do not overlap with each other, such a state may be hereinafter referred to as the “two protrusions 106a and 106b do not face each other”. Meanwhile, the state in which the two protrusions 6a and 6b each overlap each other as shown in FIGS. 8 and 9 may be referred to as the “two protrusions 6a and 6b face each other”.

In the honeycomb structure 100 of the present embodiment, the partition wall 1 disposed to surround at least one first cell 2a is provided with the first protrusion 6a and the second protrusion 6b, and the first protrusion 6a and the second protrusion 6b face each other.

In addition, in the honeycomb structure 100 of the present embodiment, an inter-protrusion length X of the distal end of the first protrusion 6a and the distal end of the second protrusion 6b is equal to or more than 10% and equal to or less than 70% with respect to a mutual distance W from one portion to the other portion on the partition walls 1 facing each other. By such a configuration, the honeycomb structure 100 of the present embodiment can achieve the effects of maintaining the wall passing flow velocity more uniformly in the extending direction of the cell 2, suppressing the increase in the pressure loss, and suppressing the reduction in the trap efficiency. In addition, due to the above-described effects, since the open frontal area OFA_IN of the first cell 2a which is the inflow cell 2_IN need not be greatly reduced, it is possible to effectively secure even the deposition capacity for depositing ash or the like.

Hereinafter, the “inter-protrusion length X of the distal end of the first protrusion 6a and the distal end of the second protrusion 6b” may be referred to as an “inter-protrusion length X” of the two protrusions 6a and 6b. In addition, the “mutual distance W from one portion to the other portion on the partition walls 1 facing each other” may be referred to as a “mutual distance W” of the partition walls 1. The “mutual distance W” of the partition walls 1 means a maximum distance between the partition wall 1 provided with the first protrusion 6a and the partition wall 1 provided with the second protrusion 6b. In addition, the “inter-protrusion length X” of the two protrusions 6a and 6b refers to the distance between the distal ends of the two protrusions 6a and 6b in a direction parallel to the direction in which the “mutual distance W” of the partition walls 1 described above is taken.

The inter-protrusion length X of the two protrusions 6a and 6b and the mutual distance W of the partition walls 1 can be obtained by the known methods such as image analysis. Further, it can be confirmed whether or not the two protrusions 6a and 6b face each other by the known methods such as the image analysis.

If the inter-protrusion length X of the two protrusions 6a and 6b is less than 10% or exceeds 70% with respect to the mutual distance W of the partition walls 1, the pressure loss of the honeycomb structure 100 is increased. The inter-protrusion length X of the two protrusions 6a and 6b is preferably 15% or more and 50% or less, more preferably 20% or more and 45% or less, with respect to the mutual distance W of the partition walls 1.

A protrusion height H1 of the first protrusion 6a is preferably 15% or more and 45% or less, more preferably 25% or more and 45% or less, with respect to the mutual distance W of the partition walls 1 facing each other. In addition, a protrusion height H2 of the second protrusion 6b is preferably 15% or more and 45% or less, more preferably 25% or more and 45% or less, with respect to the mutual distance W of the partition walls 1 facing each other. By such a configuration, it is possible to further reduce the pressure loss when the honeycomb structure 100 is used as the filter.

A total value of the protrusion height H1 of the first protrusion 6a and the protrusion height H2 of the second protrusion 6b is preferably 30% or more and 90% or less, more preferably 45% or more and 90% or less, with respect to the mutual distance W of the partition walls 1 facing each other. By such a configuration, it is possible to further reduce the pressure loss when the honeycomb structure 100 is used as the filter. The protrusion height H1 of the first protrusion 6a and the protrusion height H2 of the second protrusion 6b refer to the distance from a skirt portion to the distal end of the protrusions 6a and 6b, respectively, in the direction parallel to the direction in which the “mutual distance W” of the partition walls 1 is taken.

It is preferable that a width Y1 of the first protrusion 6a is smaller than a thickness T1 of the partition wall 1 at one position at which the first protrusion 6a is disposed. If the width Y1 of the first protrusion 6a is larger than the thickness T1 of the partition wall 1, the pressure loss of the honeycomb structure 100 may be increased. The width Y1 of the first protrusion 6a refers to a maximum value of the width of the first protrusion 6a in the direction orthogonal to the extending direction of the first protrusion 6a.

It is preferable that a width Y2 of the second protrusion 6b is smaller than a thickness T2 of the partition wall 1 at another position at which the second protrusion 6b is disposed. If the width Y2 of the second protrusion 6b is larger than the thickness T2 of the partition wall 1, the pressure loss of the honeycomb structure 100 may be increased. Here, the width Y2 of the second protrusion 6b refers to a maximum value of the width of the second protrusion 6b in the direction orthogonal to the extending direction of the second protrusion 6b.

It is preferable that the total number of the protrusions 6 protruding into one first cell 2a is equal to or less than 4. If the total number of protrusions 6 is equal to or more than 5, the pressure loss of the honeycomb structure 100 may be increased.

It is preferable that the number of combinations of the two protrusions 6a and 6b disposed in the opposed parts of the partition wall 1 in one first cell 2a is equal to or less than 2. That is, it is preferable that the number of combinations of the two protrusions 6a and 6b facing each other is equal to or less than 2. By such a configuration, it is possible to further reduce the pressure loss when the honeycomb structure 100 is used as the filter.

In the first cell 2a, in relation to the partition wall 1 surrounding the first cell 2a, the number of first cells 2a in which the two protrusions 6a and 6b facing each other are disposed is not particularly limited. However, the number of first cells 2a in which the two protrusions 6a and 6b facing each other are disposed is preferably 90% or more, more preferably 95% or more, particularly preferably 100%, with respect to the total number of first cells 2a. By such a configuration, it is possible to more effectively reduce the pressure loss.

In the honeycomb structure 100 of the present embodiment, it is preferable that the open frontal area OFA_IN of the inflow cell 2_1N may be larger than the open frontal area OFA_OUT of the outflow cell 2_OUT. However, the open frontal area OFA_IN of the inflow cell 2_1N preferably exceeds 1.0 times and less than 3.0 times the open frontal area OFA_OUT of the outflow cell 2_OUT, more preferably 1.1 to 2.9 times, still more preferably 1.2 to 2.7 times, particularly preferably 1.3 to 2.0 times. If the open frontal area OFA_IN of the inflow cell 2_IN is 1.0 times or less the open frontal area OFA_OUT of the outflow cell 2_OUT, it may be difficult to obtain the reduction effect of the pressure loss. Meanwhile, if the open frontal area OFA_IN of the inflow cell 2_1N exceeds 3.0 times the open frontal area OFA_OUT of the outflow cell 2_OUT, the open frontal area OFA_OUT of the outflow cell 2_OUT becomes too small, such that it may be difficult to obtain the reduction effect of the pressure loss.

There is no particular restriction on the shape of the protrusion 6 protruding into the first cell 2a. For example, the protrusion 6 shown in FIG. 5 is configured so that the width of the protrusion 6 is constant from the skirt portion to the distal end, but the shape of the protrusion 6 is not limited thereto. Hereinafter, an example of the shape of the protrusion 6 protruding into the first cell 2a is described with reference to FIGS. 6A to 6C and 7A to 7C. FIGS. 6A to 6C are schematic diagrams for explaining the shape of the protrusion protruding into the first cell. FIGS. 7A to 7C are schematic diagrams for explaining another shape of the protrusion protruding into the first cell. FIGS. 6A to 6C and FIGS. 7A to 7C are enlarged cross-sectional views of the partition wall 1 and the protrusion 6 disposed on the partition wall 1, in the cross section orthogonal to the extending direction of the cell 2.

The protrusion 6 shown in FIG. 6A is configured so that the width of the protrusion 6 is constant from the skirt portion to the distal end. The extending direction of the protrusion 6 is shown by an arrow in the drawing, and becomes the direction orthogonal to the surface of the partition wall 1.

The protrusion 6 shown in FIG. 6B is configured so that the width of the protrusion 6 is configured to be gradually reduced from the skirt portion to the distal end. Both side surfaces of the protrusion 6 are joined at the distal end of the protrusion 6, and in FIG. 6B, the shape of the protrusion 6 is an isosceles triangle. The extending direction of the protrusion 6 is shown by an arrow in the drawing, and becomes the direction orthogonal to the surface of the partition wall 1.

The protrusion 6 shown in FIG. 6C is configured so that the width of the protrusion 6 is configured to be gradually reduced from the skirt portion to the distal end. Both side surfaces of the protrusion 6 are not joined at the distal end of the protrusion 6, and in FIG. 6C, the shape of the protrusion 6 is a trapezoid. The extending direction of the protrusion 6 is shown by an arrow in the drawing, and becomes the direction orthogonal to the surface of the partition wall 1.

In the protrusion 6 shown in FIG. 7A, the width of the protrusion 6 is constant from the skirt portion to the middle point of the height, and thus the protrusion 6 on the distal end side has a circular arc shape. The extending direction of the protrusion 6 is shown by an arrow in the drawing, and becomes the direction orthogonal to the surface of the partition wall 1.

In the protrusion 6 shown in FIG. 7B, the width of the protrusion 6 is constant from the skirt portion to the middle point of the height, and thus the protrusion 6 on the distal end side has a semicircular arc shape. The extending direction of the protrusion 6 is shown by an arrow in the drawing, and becomes the direction orthogonal to the surface of the partition wall 1.

The protrusion 6 shown in FIG. 7C is configured so that the width of the protrusion 6 is configured to be gradually reduced from the skirt portion to the distal end. However, the lengths of the both side surfaces of the protrusion 6 are different from each other on one side surface and the other side surface, and in FIG. 7C, the shape of the protrusion 6 is a triangle. The extending direction of the protrusion 6 is shown by an arrow in the drawing, and becomes a direction toward an obliquely upward direction toward a right side of a page with respect to the surface of the partition wall 1.

There are no particular restrictions on the disposition position of the protrusion 6 protruding into the first cell 2a. Examples of the disposition position of the protrusions 6 can include disposition positions shown in FIGS. 12 to 16. FIG. 12 is an enlarged plane view of a part of the first end face for explaining an example of the protrusion. FIGS. 13 to 16 are enlarged plane views of a part of the first end face for explaining another example of the protrusion.

In FIG. 12, the two protrusions 6a and 6b disposed at the opposed parts on the partition wall 1, that is, the two protrusions 6a and 6b facing each other are disposed on the partition walls 1 which partitions the first cell 2a and the second cell 2b.

In FIG. 13, the two protrusions 6a and 6b disposed at the opposed parts on the partition wall 1 are disposed at an intersection of the partition walls 1 which partition the first cells 2a from each other. In FIG. 13, the “mutual distance W” of the partition walls 1 is a distance from one intersection of the partition wall 1 to the other intersection.

In FIG. 14, the two protrusions 6a and 6b disposed at the opposed parts on the partition wall 1 exist in two sets. Two sets of the two protrusions 6a and 6b are each disposed on the partition walls 1 which partition the first cell 2a and the second cell 2b.

In FIG. 15, the two protrusions 6a and 6b disposed at the opposed parts on the partition wall 1 exist in two sets. A first set of the two protrusions 6a and 6b is disposed on the partition walls 1 which partition the first cell 2a and the second cell 2b, and a second set of the two protrusions 6a and 6b is disposed at the intersection of the partition walls 1 which partition the first cells 2a from each other.

In FIG. 16, the two protrusions 6a and 6b disposed at the opposed parts on the partition wall 1 exist in two sets. Two sets of the two protrusions 6a and 6b are disposed on the partition wall 1 that partitions the first cells 2a from each other. In FIG. 16, the “mutual distance W” of the partition walls 1 is a distance between the middle point of the bottom portion of one protrusion 6a of the two protrusions 6a and 6b and the middle point of the bottom portion of the other protrusion 6b of the two protrusions 6a and 6b. For example, in the aspect shown in FIG. 16, in the partition walls 1 configuring each side of the rhombic first cell 2a, a middle point of one side configured by the partition wall 1 on which one protrusion 6a is disposed becomes the “middle point of the bottom portion of the one protrusion 6a”. Similarly, in the partition wall 1 configuring each side of the rhombic first cell 2a, the middle point of one side configured by the partition wall 1 in which the other protrusion 6b is disposed becomes the “middle point of the bottom portion of the other protrusion 6b”. Therefore, in FIG. 16, a “mutual distance W1(b)” becomes a distance between the “middle point of one side configured by the partition wall 1 on which one protrusion 6a is disposed” and the “middle point of one side configured by the partition wall 1 on which the other protrusion 6b is disposed”.

There are no particular restrictions on the shapes of the first cell 2a and the second cell 2b. Examples of the shapes of the first cell 2a and the second cell 2b in addition to the shapes described so far may include shapes shown in FIGS. 17 to 19. FIG. 17 is a schematic diagram for explaining a shape of a cell on a first end face side in a honeycomb structure according to another embodiment of the present invention. FIG. 18 is a schematic diagram for explaining a shape of a cell on a first end face side in a honeycomb structure according to another embodiment of the present invention. FIG. 19 is a schematic diagram for explaining a shape of a cell on a first end face side in a honeycomb structure according to still another embodiment of the present invention. In FIG. 17, reference numeral 21 represents a partition wall. In FIG. 18, reference numeral 41 represents a partition wall. In FIG. 19, reference numeral 61 represents a partition wall. FIGS. 17 to 19 are drawn in a state in which the protrusions disposed on the partition walls 21, 41, and 61 are omitted.

In the honeycomb structure 200 shown in FIG. 17, a shape of a first cell 22a is hexagon and a shape of a second cell 22b is a quadrangle. In the case of comparing the first cell 22a in FIG. 17 with the first cell 2a of the honeycomb structure 100 shown in FIGS. 1 to 5, the width of the first cell 22a sandwiched between the two second cells 22b is relatively wide. In the honeycomb structure 200 shown in FIG. 17, the open frontal area OFA_IN of the first cell 22a is larger than the open frontal area OFA_OUT of the second cell 22b.

In a honeycomb structure 300 shown in FIG. 18, shapes of a first cell 42a and a second cell 42b are both hexagonal. Since the shapes of the first cell 42a and the second cell 42b are each the same but a ratio of the number of first cells 42a and the number of second cells 42b is different, in the whole honeycomb structure 300, an open frontal area OFA_IN of the first cell 42a is larger than an open frontal area OFA_OUT of the second cell 42b.

In a honeycomb structure 400 shown in FIG. 19, a shape of a first cell 62a is octagon and a shape of a second cell 62b is a quadrangle. Even in a honeycomb structure 400 shown in FIG. 19, an open frontal area OFA_IN of the first cell 62a is larger than an open frontal area OFA_OUT of the second cell 62b.

In the honeycomb structure 100 as shown in FIGS. 1 to 5, the thickness of the partition wall 1 is preferably 0.15 to 0.40 mm, more preferably 0.18 to 0.35 mm, particularly preferably 0.20 to 0.33 mm. If the thickness of the partition wall 1 is less than 0.15 mm, the mechanical strength of the honeycomb structure 100 may be reduced. If the thickness of the partition wall 1 exceeds 0.40 mm, the pressure loss of the honeycomb structure 100 may be increased.

The material forming the partition wall 1 is not particularly limited, but from the viewpoint of strength, heat resistance, durability and the like, the main component of the material is preferably various kinds of ceramics or metals of oxides or non-oxides. Specifically, examples of the ceramics may include cordierite, mullite, alumina, spinel, silicon carbide, silicon nitride, aluminum titanate, and the like. Examples of the metal may include Fe—Cr—Al based metal, metal silicon, and the like. It is preferable to use one or more selected from these materials as the main component. It is particularly preferable to use one or two or more selected from the group consisting of alumina, mullite, aluminum titanate, cordierite, silicon carbide, and silicon nitride as the main component, from the viewpoint of the high strength, the high heat resistance, and the like. In addition, it is particularly preferable to use silicon carbide or a silicon-silicon carbide composite material from the viewpoint of the high thermal conductivity, the high heat resistance, and the like. Here, the “main component” means a component contained at a ratio of 50 mass % or more in the materials forming the partition wall 1. It is preferable that the main component is contained in the material forming the partition wall 1 at a ratio of 70 mass % or more, more preferably at a ratio of 80 mass % or more.

The whole shape of the honeycomb structure is not particularly limited. For example, in the whole shape of the honeycomb structure 100 shown in FIG. 1, the first end face 11 and the second end face 12 are a round pillar shape. Although not shown, as the whole shape of the honeycomb structure, the first end face and the second end face may be a substantially circular pillar shape such as an elliptical shape, a racetrack shape, and an oblong shape. In addition, as the whole shape of the honeycomb structure, the first end face and the second end face may also have a polygonal prismatic columnar shape such as a quadrangle and a hexagon.

A method for manufacturing a honeycomb structure is not particularly limited and therefore the honeycomb structure can be manufactured by, for example, the following method. First, a plastic kneaded material for manufacturing the honeycomb structure is prepared. The kneaded material for manufacturing the honeycomb structure is raw material powder and can be prepared by appropriately adding additives such as a binder and water to materials selected from the materials suitable for the partition wall.

Next, a pillar-shaped honeycomb formed body having partition walls defining a plurality of cells is obtained by extruding the prepared kneaded material. In the extrusion, as a die for the extrusion, it is preferable to use the die having the desired cell shape, partition wall thickness, and cell density. It is preferable to further dispose serrations corresponding to various protrusion shapes described so far from a slit for the extrusion of the partition wall as the die.

The obtained honeycomb formed body is dried by, for example, microwave and hot air, and is provided with the plugging portion by plugging the open end of the cell using the same material as the material used for the manufacturing of the honeycomb formed body. After the plugging portion is disposed, the honeycomb formed body may be further dried.

Next, the honeycomb structure of the present embodiment is obtained by firing the honeycomb formed body provided with the plugging portion. The firing temperature and the firing atmosphere vary depending on the raw materials, and those skilled in the art can select the firing temperature and the firing atmosphere most suitable for the selected material.

EXAMPLES

Hereinafter, the present invention is specifically described based on examples, but the present invention is not limited to these examples.

Example 1

The kneaded material was prepared by adding 5.5 parts by mass of a pore former, 90 parts by mass of a dispersing medium, 5.5 parts by mass of an organic binder, and 2.6 parts by mass of a surfactant, respectively, to 100 parts by mass of a cordierite forming raw material and mixing and kneading them. Alumina, aluminum hydroxide, kaolin, talc, and silica were used as the cordierite forming raw materials. Water was used as the dispersing medium, and a water absorbable resin was used as the pore former.

Next, the honeycomb formed body of which the entire shape is a round pillar shape was obtained by extruding the kneaded material using the die for manufacturing the honeycomb formed body. The honeycomb formed body was provided with a rectangular cell and a hexagonal cell which are defined by the partition walls. The honeycomb formed body was configured so that four hexagonal cells surround the rectangular cell. As shown in FIG. 12, in the honeycomb formed body, the opposed parts on the partition wall 1 were provided with two protrusions 6a and 6b. The partition walls 1 provided with the protrusions 6a and 6b is the partition walls 1 which partitions the first cell 2a and the second cell 2b when the open end of the cell 2 is provided with the plugging portion 5.

Next, after the honeycomb formed body was dried by a microwave dryer and further completely dried by a hot air dryer, both end faces of the honeycomb formed body were cut and adjusted to a predetermined dimension.

Next, a film was covered to cover the entire area of the end face of one side of the honeycomb formed body, and a perforated portion was open at a place corresponding to the open end of the rectangular cell of the film. Next, the open end of the rectangular cell was filled with a plugging material by dipping an end portion on a side covered with the film of the honeycomb formed body in a slurry-like plugging material containing the cordierite forming raw material. In the finally obtained honeycomb structure, the end face on one side of the honeycomb formed body was referred to as the inflow end face.

Next, a film was covered to cover the entire area of the other end face of the honeycomb formed body, and a perforated portion was open at a place corresponding to the open end of the hexagonal cell of the film. Next, the open end of the hexagonal cell was filled with a plugging material by dipping an end portion on a side covered with the film of the honeycomb formed body in the slurry-like plugging material containing the cordierite forming raw material. In the finally obtained honeycomb structure, the other end face of the honeycomb formed body was referred to as the outflow end face.

Next, the honeycomb structure according to the Example 1 was manufactured by degreasing and firing the honeycomb formed body in which the open ends of each cell are filled with the plugging material.

In the obtained honeycomb structure, as shown in FIG. 12, the partition walls 1 disposed to surround the inflow cell 2_IN were each provided with the protrusions 6a and 6b which protrude into the inflow cell 2_1N. The two protrusions 6a and 6b were disposed so that the protrusions 6a and 6b at least partially overlap with each other on the extended lines in the extending directions of the protrusions 6a and 6b, respectively. The thickness of the partition wall 1 was 0.30 mm. In addition, the porosity of the partition wall 1 was 41%. The porosity of the partition wall 1 was a value measured by a mercury porosimeter. In FIG. 12, the mutual distance W1(a) of the partition walls 1 facing each other in the inflow cell 2_IN was 0.74 mm. The mutual distance W1(b) of the partition walls 1 facing each other in the inflow cell 2_1N was 2.44 mm. The mutual distance W2 of the partition walls 1 facing each other in the outflow cell 2_OUT was 1.40 mm. The following Table 1 shows the results.

As shown in FIG. 12, in the honeycomb structure according to the above Example 1, the partition walls 1 which partition the inflow cell 2_1N and the outflow cell 2_OUT is provided with the two protrusions 6a and 6b facing each other. As described above, in the case in which the partition walls 1 which partition the inflow cell 2_1N and the outflow cell 2_OUT are provided with the two protrusions 6a and 6b facing each other, a “IN-OUT partition wall” is shown in a column of the “position of protrusion” in the following Table 1. In the case in which the partition walls 1 which partition the inflow cells 2_m from each other is provided with the two protrusions 6a and 6b facing each other, a “IN-IN partition wall” is shown in a column of the “position of protrusion” in the following Table 3 and Table 12.

As shown in FIG. 12, the extending directions of the two protrusions 6a and 6b facing each other were a 90° direction with respect to the surface of the partition wall 1. The protrusion heights H of the two protrusions 6a and 6b facing each other were 0.11 mm. The width Y of the two protrusions 6a and 6b facing each other was 0.27 mm. The inter-protrusion length X(a) of the two protrusions 6a and 6b facing each other was 0.52 mm. In the honeycomb structure according to the above Example 1, the inter-protrusion length X(a) becomes 70% with respect to the mutual distance W1(a). The following Table 1 shows the results. In the above Example 1, the shapes of the two protrusions 6a and 6b facing each other are the same as each other. The column of the “extending direction of protrusion” in the following Table 1 indicates the extending direction of the two protrusions 6a and 6b facing each other. The angle described in the column of the “extending direction of protrusion” indicates a size of an angle formed by the “extending direction of the protrusion” and the “extending direction of the partition wall provided with the protrusion”. When the “extending direction of the partition wall which is in contact with the bottom portion on one edge side of the protrusion” and the “extending direction of the partition wall which is in contact with the bottom portion on the other edge side of the protrusion” are different from each other, an angle smaller than the formed angle is described in a column of the “extending direction of protrusion”.

	TABLE 1
		Mutual	Mutual
		distance of	distance
		partition	of partition
	Thickness	walls of first	walls of					Inter-
	of partition	cell (inflow	second cell			Protrusion	Width of	protrusion	Ratio of
	wall	cell)	(outflow cell)		Extending	height	protrusion	length	X(a) to
	T	W1(a)	W1(b)	W2		direction of	H	Y	X(a)	W1(a)
	(mm)	(mm)	(mm)	(mm)	Position of protrusion	protrusion	(mm)	(mm)	(mm)	(%)
Comparative	0.30	0.74	2.44	1.40	No presence	—	—	—	0.74	100
Example 21
Comparative	0.30	0.74	2.44	1.40	IN-OUT partition wall	90°	0.05	0.27	0.64	86
Example 1
Comparative	0.30	0.74	2.44	1.40	IN-OUT partition wall	90°	0.10	0.27	0.54	73
Example 2
Example 1	0.30	0.74	2.44	1.40	IN-OUT partition wall	90°	0.11	0.27	0.52	70
Example 2	0.30	0.74	2.44	1.40	IN-OUT partition wall	90°	0.15	0.27	0.44	59
Example 3	0.30	0.74	2.44	1.40	IN-OUT partition wall	90°	0.20	0.27	0.34	46
Example 4	0.30	0.74	2.44	1.40	IN-OUT partition wall	90°	0.25	0.27	0.24	32
Example 5	0.30	0.74	2.44	1.40	IN-OUT partition wall	90°	0.30	0.27	0.14	19
Example 6	0.30	0.74	2.44	1.40	IN-OUT partition wall	90°	0.32	0.27	0.10	14
Example 7	0.30	0.74	2.44	1.40	IN-OUT partition wall	90°	0.33	0.27	0.08	11
Comparative	0.30	0.74	2.44	1.40	IN-OUT partition wall	90°	0.34	0.27	0.06	8
Example 3
Comparative	0.30	0.74	2.44	1.40	IN-OUT partition wall	90°	0.35	0.27	0.04	5
Example 4
Comparative	0.30	0.74	2.44	1.40	IN-OUT partition wall	90°	0.36	0.27	0.02	3
Example 5

	TABLE 2
				Determination
	Pressure loss		Determination	on trap	Overall
	(kPa)	Reduction rate	on pressure loss	efficiency	determination
Comparative	6.00	1.00	Not acceptable	Excellent	Not acceptable
Example 21
Comparative	5.85	0.98	Not acceptable	Excellent	Not acceptable
Example 1
Comparative	5.75	0.96	Not acceptable	Excellent	Not acceptable
Example 2
Example 1	5.39	0.90	Excellent	Excellent	Excellent
Example 2	5.32	0.89	Excellent	Excellent	Excellent
Example 3	5.32	0.89	Excellent	Excellent	Excellent
Example 4	5.25	0.88	Excellent	Excellent	Excellent
Example 5	5.26	0.88	Excellent	Excellent	Excellent
Example 6	5.29	0.88	Excellent	Excellent	Excellent
Example 7	5.40	0.90	Excellent	Excellent	Excellent
Comparative	5.75	0.96	Not acceptable	Excellent	Not acceptable
Example 3
Comparative	6.00	1.00	Not acceptable	Excellent	Not acceptable
Example 4
Comparative	6.50	1.08	Not acceptable	Excellent	Not acceptable
Example 5

Examples 2 to 7, Comparative Examples 1 to 5 and 21

The honeycomb structure was manufactured in the same manner as in Example 1 except that the configurations of the protrusions 6a and 6b as shown in FIG. 12 were changed as shown in the above Table 1. In Comparative Example 21, the honeycomb structure was manufactured without providing the protrusions 6a and 6b protruding into the inflow cell 2_1N which is the first cell 2a.

In relation to Examples 1 to 7 and Comparative Examples 1 to 5 and 21, the pressure loss was measured by the following method. In addition, the reduction rate of the pressure loss was calculated based on the value of the measured pressure loss. When the pressure loss of the honeycomb structure of Comparative Example 21 is set to be 1.00, the reduction rate of the pressure loss refers to the ratios of the pressure losses of the honeycomb structures of the respective Examples and Comparative Examples. The determination on the honeycomb structures of the respective Examples and Comparative Examples was made based on the value of the reduction rate of the pressure loss. The case in which the reduction rate of the pressure loss is equal to or more than 10% was determined as “excellent”, the case in which the reduction rate of the pressure loss is equal to or more than 5% and less than 10% was determined as “good”, and the case in which the reduction rate of the pressure loss is less than 5% was determined as “not acceptable”. The respective results are shown in columns of “pressure loss (kPa)”, “reduction rate”, and “determination on pressure loss” in the above Table 2.

(Pressure Loss)

First, the honeycomb structure was mounted on an exhaust pipe provided with a soot generation apparatus. Next, the soot generation apparatus was operated to control a temperature of exhaust gas to be 200° C., a flow rate of the exhaust gas to be about 2.3 Nm³/min, and PM included in the exhaust gas to be emitted to be deposited on the honeycomb structure. Pressures of pressure gauges attached to the front and rear of the honeycomb structure were measured in a state in which the deposited amount of the PM becomes 4 g/L to obtain a differential pressure of the front and rear. The differential pressure is set to be the pressure loss of the honeycomb structure.

In relation to Examples 1 to 7 and Comparative Examples 1 to 5 and 21, the trap efficiency was evaluated by the following method. The respective results are shown in a column of the “determination on trap efficiency” in the above Table 2.

(Trap Efficiency)

In the evaluation on the trap efficiency, when the honeycomb structures of the respective Examples and Comparative Examples were used as the filter for the exhaust gas purification, the leakage number of the particulate matter (hereinafter referred to as “PM”) was measured and the evaluation on the trap efficiency was made. Specifically, first, the honeycomb structure was attached to an exhaust system of a passenger car equipped with a diesel engine having displacement of 2.0 liters. When the passenger car was run in a new European driving cycle (NEDC) mode, the PM trap efficiency was calculated based on the ratio of the whole number of PMs in the exhaust gas to the total number of PMs at an outlet (outflow side) of the honeycomb structure. The measurement of the number of PMs was made by the method proposed in particle measurement program (abbreviated as “PMP”) in exhaust gas energy-specialist conference of World Forum for Harmonization of Vehicle Regulations in Economic Commission for Europe. The case in which the trap efficiency thus obtained is equal to or more than 90% was determined as “excellent” and the case in which the so obtained trap efficiency is less than 90% was determined as “not acceptable”.

The overall determination on Examples 1 to 7 and Comparative Examples 1 to 5 and 21 was made based on the results of the “determination on pressure loss” and the “determination on trap efficiency”. The results are shown in the column of the “overall determination” in the above Table 2. In the “overall determination”, only the case in which the results of the “determination on pressure loss” and the “determination on trap efficiency” are “excellent” or “good” was determined as “excellent” and the case in which at least one of the results of the “determination on pressure loss” and the “determination on trap efficiency” is “not acceptable” was determined as “not acceptable”.

Examples 8 to 15, Comparative Examples 6 to 10

The honeycomb structure was manufactured in the same manner as in Example 1 except that the configurations of the protrusions 6a and 6b as shown in FIG. 12 were changed as shown in the following Table 3. For the manufactured honeycomb structure, the pressure loss was measured in the same manner as the above Example 1. In addition, the reduction rate of the pressure loss was calculated based on the measured value of the pressure loss, and the honeycomb structures of the respective Examples and Comparative Examples were determined. The following Table 4 shows the respective results. It should be noted that a column of “determination” in the following Table 4 shows the results of the determination on pressure loss.

	TABLE 3
	Thickness	Mutual distance	Mutual distance of
	of	of partition	partition walls of
	partition	walls of first	second cell (outflow		Extending	Protrusion	Width of	Inter-protrusion	Ratio of
	wall	cell (inflow cell)	cell)		direction	height	protrusion	length	X(a) to
	T	W1(a)	W1(b)	W2	Position of	of	H	Y	X(a)	W1(a)
	(mm)	(mm)	(mm)	(mm)	protrusion	protrusion	(mm)	(mm)	(mm)	(%)
Comparative	0.30	0.74	2.44	1.40	No presence	—	—	—	2.44	100
Example 21
Comparative	0.30	0.74	2.44	1.40	IN-IN partition wall	45°	0.1	0.27	2.24	92
Example 6
Comparative	0.30	0.74	2.44	1.40	IN-IN partition wall	45°	0.2	0.27	2.04	84
Example 7
Comparative	0.30	0.74	2.44	1.40	IN-IN partition wall	45°	0.3	0.27	1.84	75
Example 8
Example 8	0.30	0.74	2.44	1.40	IN-IN partition wall	45°	0.4	0.27	1.7	70
Example 9	0.30	0.74	2.44	1.40	IN-IN partition wall	45°	0.5	0.27	1.44	59
Example 10	0.30	0.74	2.44	1.40	IN-IN partition wall	45°	0.6	0.27	1.24	51
Example 11	0.30	0.74	2.44	1.40	IN-IN partition wall	45°	0.7	0.27	1.04	43
Example 12	0.30	0.74	2.44	1.40	IN-IN partition wall	45°	0.8	0.27	0.84	34
Example 13	0.30	0.74	2.44	1.40	IN-IN partition wall	45°	0.9	0.27	0.64	26
Example 14	0.30	0.74	2.44	1.40	IN-IN partition wall	45°	1.0	0.27	0.44	18
Example 15	0.30	0.74	2.44	1.40	IN-IN partition wall	45°	1.1	0.27	0.24	10
Comparative	0.30	0.74	2.44	1.40	IN-IN partition wall	45°	1.15	0.27	0.14	6
Example 9
Comparative	0.30	0.74	2.44	1.40	IN-IN partition wall	45°	1.2	0.27	0.04	2
Example 10

	TABLE 4
	Pressure loss	Reduction
	(kPa)	rate	Determination
	Comparative	6.00	1.00	Not acceptable
	Example 21
	Comparative	5.97	1.00	Not acceptable
	Example 6
	Comparative	5.93	0.99	Not acceptable
	Example 7
	Comparative	5.85	0.98	Not acceptable
	Example 8
	Example 8	5.75	0.90	Excellent
	Example 9	5.40	0.89	Excellent
	Example 10	5.35	0.88	Excellent
	Example 11	5.30	0.87	Excellent
	Example 12	5.25	0.87	Excellent
	Example 13	5.29	0.88	Excellent
	Example 14	5.32	0.89	Excellent
	Example 15	5.40	0.90	Excellent
	Comparative	6.00	1.00	Not acceptable
	Example 9
	Comparative	6.80	1.13	Not acceptable
	Example 10

Examples 16 to 20, Comparative Examples 11 to 15

The honeycomb structure was manufactured in the same manner as in Example 1 except that the configurations of the protrusions 6a and 6b as shown in FIG. 12 were changed as shown in the following Table 5. However, in Examples 17 to 19 and Comparative Example 11 to 15, the height H1 of the first protrusion and the height H2 of the second protrusion were different from each other as shown in Table 5. For the manufactured honeycomb structure, the pressure loss was measured in the same manner as the above Example 1. In addition, the reduction rate of the pressure loss was calculated based on the measured value of the pressure loss and the honeycomb structures of the respective Examples and Comparative Examples were determined. The following Table 6 shows the respective results. It should be noted that a column of “determination” in the following Table 6 shows the results of the determination on pressure loss.

	TABLE 5
	Mutual
	distance of		First protrusion
	partition walls of		Extending	Protrusion	Width of
	first cell		direction	height	protrusion
	W1(a)	W1(b)		of	H1	Y1
	(mm)	(mm)	Position of protrusion	protrusion	(mm)	(mm)
Comparative	0.74	2.44	No presence	—	—	—
Example 21
Comparative	0.74	2.44	IN-OUT partition wall	90°	0.05	0.27
Example 11
Comparative	0.74	2.44	IN-OUT partition wall	90°	0.08	0.27
Example 12
Example 16	0.74	2.44	IN-OUT partition wall	90°	0.11	0.27
Example 17	0.74	2.44	IN-OUT partition wall	90°	0.18	0.27
Example 18	0.74	2.44	IN-OUT partition wall	90°	0.25	0.27
Example 19	0.74	2.44	IN-OUT partition wall	90°	0.30	0.27
Example 20	0.74	2.44	IN-OUT partition wall	90°	0.33	0.27
Comparative	0.74	2.44	IN-OUT partition wall	90°	0.34	0.27
Example 13
Comparative	0.74	2.44	IN-OUT partition wall	90°	0.35	0.27
Example 14
Comparative	0.74	2.44	IN-OUT partition wall	90°	0.36	0.27
Example 15
			Ratio
	Second protrusion		of	Ratio
		Protrusion	Width of	Inter-protrusion	X(a)	of H1	Ratio
		height	protrusion	length	to	to	H2 to
		H2	Y2	X(a)	W1(a)	W1(a)	W1(a)
		(mm)	(mm)	(mm)	(%)	(%)	(%)
	Comparative	—	—	0.74	100	—	—
	Example 21
	Comparative	0.04	0.27	0.65	88	7	5
	Example 11
	Comparative	0.09	0.27	0.57	77	11	12
	Example 12
	Example 16	0.11	0.27	0.52	70	15	15
	Example 17	0.19	0.27	0.37	50	24	26
	Example 18	0.23	0.27	0.26	35	34	31
	Example 19	0.31	0.27	0.13	18	41	42
	Example 20	0.33	0.27	0.08	11	45	45
	Comparative	0.35	0.27	0.05	7	46	47
	Example 13
	Comparative	0.36	0.27	0.03	4	47	49
	Example 14
	Comparative	0.37	0.37	0.01	1	49	50
	Example 15

	TABLE 6
	Pressure loss	Reduction
	(kPa)	rate	Determination
	Comparative	6.00	1.00	Not acceptable
	Example 21
	Comparative	5.85	0.98	Not acceptable
	Example 11
	Comparative	5.75	0.96	Not acceptable
	Example 12
	Example 16	5.40	0.90	Excellent
	Example 17	5.32	0.89	Excellent
	Example 18	5.25	0.88	Excellent
	Example 19	5.26	0.88	Excellent
	Example 20	5.38	0.90	Excellent
	Comparative	5.75	0.96	Not acceptable
	Example 13
	Comparative	5.85	0.98	Not acceptable
	Example 14
	Comparative	6.50	1.08	Not acceptable
	Example 15

Examples 21 to 26, Comparative Examples 16 to 20

The honeycomb structure was manufactured in the same manner as in Example 1 except that the configurations of the protrusions 6a and 6b as shown in FIG. 12 were changed as shown in the following Table 7. However, in Examples 23 to 25 and Comparative Example 16 to 20, the height H1 of the first protrusion and the height 112 of the second protrusion were different from each other as shown in Table 7. For the manufactured honeycomb structure, the pressure loss was measured in the same manner as the above Example 1. In addition, the reduction rate of the pressure loss was calculated based on the measured value of the pressure loss, and the honeycomb structures of the respective Examples and Comparative Examples were determined. The following Table 8 shows the respective results. It should be noted that a column of “determination” in the following Table 8 shows the results of the determination on pressure loss.

	TABLE 7
	Mutual
	distance of		First protrusion
	partition walls		Extending	Protrusion	Width of
	of first cell		direction	height	protrusion
	W1(a)	W1(b)		of	H1	Y1
	(mm)	(mm)	Position of protrusion	protrusion	(mm)	(mm)
Comparative Example 21	0.74	2.44	No presence	—	—	—
Comparative Example 16	0.74	2.44	IN-OUT partition wall	90°	0.05	0.27
Comparative Example 17	0.74	2.44	IN-OUT partition wall	90°	0.08	0.27
Example 21	0.74	2.44	IN-OUT partition wall	90°	0.11	0.27
Example 22	0.74	2.44	IN-OUT partition wall	90°	0.15	0.27
Example 23	0.74	2.44	IN-OUT partition wall	90°	0.18	0.27
Example 24	0.74	2.44	IN-OUT partition wall	90°	0.25	0.27
Example 25	0.74	2.44	IN-OUT partition wall	90°	0.30	0.27
Example 26	0.74	2.44	IN-OUT partition wall	90°	0.33	0.27
Comparative Example 18	0.74	2.44	IN-OUT partition wall	90°	0.34	0.27
Comparative Example 19	0.74	2.44	IN-OUT partition wall	90°	0.35	0.27
Comparative Example 20	0.74	2.44	IN-OUT partition wall	90°	0.36	0.27
			Ratio		Ratio of
	Second protrusion		of	Total sum of	total
	Protrusion	Width of	Inter-protrusion	X(a)	protrusion	sum of
	height	protrusion	length	to	heights	H to
	H2	Y2	X(a)	W1(a)	Total sum of H	W1(a)
	(mm)	(mm)	(mm)	(%)	(mm)	(%)
Comparative Example 21	—	—	0.74	100	—	—
Comparative Example 16	0.04	0.27	0.65	88	0.09	12
Comparative Example 17	0.09	0.27	0.57	77	0.17	23
Example 21	0.11	0.27	0.52	70	0.22	30
Example 22	0.15	0.27	0.44	59	0.30	41
Example 23	0.19	0.27	0.37	50	0.37	50
Example 24	0.23	0.27	0.26	35	0.48	65
Example 25	0.31	0.27	0.13	18	0.61	82
Example 26	0.33	0.27	0.08	11	0.66	90
Comparative Example 18	0.35	0.27	0.05	7	0.69	93
Comparative Example 19	0.36	0.27	0.03	4	0.71	96
Comparative Example 20	0.37	0.37	0.01	1	0.73	99

	TABLE 8
	Pressure loss	Reduction
	(kPa)	rate	Determination
	Comparative	6.00	1.00	Not acceptable
	Example 21
	Comparative	5.82	0.97	Not acceptable
	Example 16
	Comparative	5.78	0.96	Not acceptable
	Example 17
	Example 21	5.40	0.90	Excellent
	Example 22	5.36	0.89	Excellent
	Example 23	5.29	0.88	Excellent
	Example 24	5.25	0.88	Excellent
	Example 25	5.26	0.88	Excellent
	Example 26	5.31	0.89	Excellent
	Comparative	5.75	0.96	Not acceptable
	Example 18
	Comparative	5.85	0.98	Not acceptable
	Example 19
	Comparative	6.50	1.08	Not acceptable
	Example 20

Examples 27 to 32, Comparative Example 22

The honeycomb structure was manufactured in the same manner as in Example 1 except that the configurations of the protrusions 6a and 6b as shown in FIG. 12 were changed as shown in the following Table 9. In Examples 27 to 32 and Comparative Example 22, the width of the protrusion was changed as shown in the following Table 9. For the manufactured honeycomb structure, the pressure loss was measured in the same manner as the above Example 1. In addition, the reduction rate of the pressure loss was calculated based on the measured value of the pressure loss, and the honeycomb structures of the respective Examples and Comparative Examples were determined. The following Table 10 shows the respective results. It should be noted that a column of “determination” in the following Table 10 shows the results of the determination on pressure loss.

	TABLE 9
			Mutual
			distance
			of
		Mutual	partition
	Thickness	distance of	wall of
	of	partition wall of	second			Protrusion	Width of	Inter-protrusion	Ratio of
	partition	first cell	cell		Extending	height	protrusion	length	X(a) to
	wall	W1(a)	W1(b)	W2		direction of	H	Y	X(a)	W1(a)
	T (mm)	(mm)	(mm)	(mm)	Position of protrusion	protrusion	(mm)	(mm)	(mm)	(%)	Y/T
Comparative	—	0.74	2.44	1.395	No presence	—	—	—	0.74	100	—
Example 22
Example 27	0.30	0.74	2.44	1.395	IN-OUT partition wall	90°	0.30	0.60	0.14	19	1.97
Example 28	0.30	0.74	2.44	1.395	IN-OUT partition wall	90°	0.30	0.50	0.14	19	1.64
Example 29	0.30	0.74	2.44	1.395	IN-OUT partition wall	90°	0.30	0.40	0.14	19	1.32
Example 30	0.30	0.74	2.44	1.395	IN-OUT partition wall	90°	0.30	0.30	0.14	19	0.99
Example 31	0.30	0.74	2.44	1.395	IN-OUT partition wall	90°	0.30	0.20	0.14	19	0.66
Example 32	0.30	0.74	2.44	1.395	IN-OUT partition wall	90°	0.30	0.10	0.14	19	0.33

	TABLE 10
	Pressure loss	Reduction
	(kPa)	rate	Determination
	Comparative	6.00	1.00	Not acceptable
	Example 22
	Example 27	5.70	0.95	Good
	Example 28	5.56	0.93	Good
	Example 29	5.45	0.91	Good
	Example 30	5.40	0.90	Excellent
	Example 31	5.20	0.87	Excellent
	Example 32	5.10	0.85	Excellent

Examples 33 to 39

The honeycomb structure was manufactured by changing the protrusions facing each other to the configuration of protrusions shown in the “corresponding figure” of the following Table 11. Specific configurations of each protrusion are as shown in the following Tables 11 and 12. In the following Tables 11 and 12, a “protrusion A” means a protrusion provided on an IN-OUT partition wall, and a “protrusion B” means a protrusion provided on an IN-IN partition wall. For the manufactured honeycomb structure, the pressure loss was measured in the same manner as the above Example 1. In addition, the reduction rate of the pressure loss was calculated based on the measured value of the pressure loss and the honeycomb structures of the respective Examples were determined. The following Table 13 shows the respective results. It should be noted that a column of “determination” in the following Table 13 shows the results of the determination on pressure loss.

	TABLE 11
		Mutual
	Mutual	distance of
	distance of	partition	Inter-		Inter-
	partition walls	walls of	protrusion A		protrusion B		Total
	of first cell	second cell	length	Ratio of X(a)	length	Ratio of X(b)	number of
	Corresponding	W1(a)	W1(b)	W2	X(a)	to W1(a)	X(b)	to W1(b),	protrusions
	figure	(mm)	(mm)	(mm)	(mm)	(%)	(mm)	(%)	(Number)
Comparative Example 21	—	0.74	2.44	1.40	0.74	100	2.44	174	—
Example 33	FIG. 12	0.74	2.44	1.40	0.38	51	—	—	2
Example 34	FIG. 13	0.74	2.44	1.40	—	—	1.20	49	2
Example 35	FIG. 14	0.74	2.44	1.40	0.38	51	—	—	4
Example 36	FIG. 16	0.74	2.07	1.40	—	—	0.83	40	4
Example 37	FIG. 15	0.74	2.44	1.40	0.38	51	1.20	49	4
Example 38	—	0.74	2.44	1.40	0.38	51	1.20	49	6
Example 39	—	0.74	2.44	1.40	0.38	51	1.20	49	6

	TABLE 12
	Protrusion A	Protrusion B
	Protrusion	Width of	The			Protrusion	Width of
	height	protrusion	number of		Progressing	height	protrusion	The number of		Extending
	H	Y	protrusions	Position of	direction of	H	Y	protrusions	Position of	direction
	(mm)	(mm)	(Number)	protrusion	protrusion	(mm)	(mm)	(Number)	protrusion	of protrusion
Comparative	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
Example 21
Example 33	0.18	0.26	2	IN-OUT	90°	—	—	0	—	—
				partition wall
Example 34	—	—	0	—	—	0.62	0.26	2	IN-IN	45°
									partition wall
Example 35	0.18	0.26	4	IN-OUT	90°	—	—	0	—	—
				partition wall
Example 36	—	—	0	—	—	0.62	0.26	4	IN-IN	45°
									partition wall
Example 37	0.18	0.26	2	IN-OUT	90°	0.62	0.26	2	IN-IN	45°
				partition wall					partition wall
Example 38	0.18	0.26	4	IN-OUT	90°	0.62	0.26	2	IN-IN	45°
				partition wall					partition wall
Example 39	0.18	0.26	2	IN-OUT	90°	0.62	0.26	4	IN-IN	45°
				partition wall					partition wall

	TABLE 13
	Pressure loss	Reduction
	(kPa)	rate	Determination
	Comparative	6.00	1.00	Not acceptable
	Example 21
	Example 33	5.10	0.85	Excellent
	Example 34	5.00	0.83	Excellent
	Example 35	5.10	0.85	Excellent
	Example 36	4.90	0.82	Excellent
	Example 37	5.00	0.83	Excellent
	Example 38	5.50	0.92	Good
	Example 39	5.60	0.93	Good

(Result)

The honeycomb structures of Examples 1 to 39 have two or more protrusions protruding into the inflow cell which is the first cell, in which the two protrusions are each disposed to at least partially overlap with each other on the extended lines in the extending directions of the respective protrusions. In the honeycomb structures of Examples 1 to 39, the inter-protrusion length X of the two protrusions facing each other was equal to or more than 10% and equal to or less than 70% with respect to the mutual distance W of the partition walls. It was confirmed that the honeycomb structures of Examples 1 to 39 have the more reduced pressure loss than the honeycomb structure of Comparative Example 21 or Comparative Example 22. On the other hand, in the honeycomb structures of Comparative Examples 1 to 20, the inter-protrusion length X of the two protrusions facing each other was less than 10% and exceeded 70% with respect to the mutual distance W of the partition walls and the honeycomb structures of Comparative Examples 1 to 20 had the lower reduction rate of the pressure loss than the honeycomb structures of Examples 1 to 39. In addition, since there are more preferable values for the height and width of the protrusion, it was found that the pressure loss can be further reduced by adjusting these values. In addition, in the honeycomb structures of Examples 1 to 7, the evaluation on the trap efficiency also showed excellent results. Therefore, it was found that the honeycomb structures of Examples 1 to 7 have excellent characteristics in the trap efficiency while realizing the reduction in the pressure loss.

The honeycomb structure of the present invention can be particularly advantageously used for applications such as an exhaust gas purification treatment apparatus for purifying particulate matters such as particulates included in a fluid such as exhaust gas emitted from a diesel engine, a gasoline engine, or the like.

DESCRIPTION OF REFERENCE NUMERALS

1,21,41,61: Partition wall, 2,22,42,62: Cell, 2a,22a,42a,62a: First cell (cell), 2b,22b,42b,62b: Second cell (cell), 2_1N: Inflow cell, 2_OUT: Outflow cell, 3: Circumferential wall, 5: Plugging portion, 6: Protrusion, 6a: First protrusion (protrusion), 6b: Second protrusion (Protrusion), 11: First end face, 12: Second end face, 100,200,300,400: Honeycomb structure, 101: Partition wall, 102: Cell, 106a,106b: Protrusion, P1: Middle point of bottom portion of protrusion, P2: middle point of a width of protrusion at half position of a height of protrusion

Claims

1. A honeycomb structure, comprising: porous partition walls defining a plurality of cells which become a fluid channel extending from a first end face to a second end face,wherein the plurality of cells include at least one first cell in which an end portion on the first end face side is open and an end portion on the second end face side is plugged and at least one second cell in which an end portion on the first end face side is plugged and an end portion on the second end face side is open,the honeycomb structure is configured to pass a fluid introduced from the first end face side through the partition wall to emit the fluid into the second cell as a filtration fluid and emit the filtration fluid from the second end face side,in a cross section orthogonal to an extending direction of the cell, the first cell is disposed around the second cell,an open frontal area of the first cell on the first end face is larger than that of the second cell on the second end face,on at least the partition walls disposed to surround one first cell, opposed parts of the partition walls having the one first cell sandwiched therebetween are each provided with a protrusion which protrudes into the one first cell,among the two protrusions disposed on opposed parts of the partition walls, the protrusion disposed on one opposed part on the partition walls is defined as a first protrusion and the protrusion disposed at the other opposed part on the partition walls is defined as a second protrusion, the first protrusion and the second protrusion are each disposed to at least partially overlap with each other on extended lines in extending directions of the respective protrusions, andan inter-protrusion length (X) of a distal end of the first protrusion and a distal end of the second protrusion is equal to or more than 10% and equal to or less than 70% with respect to a mutual distance (W) from the one part to the other part on the partition walls facing each other.

2. The honeycomb structure according to claim 1, wherein a protrusion height (H1) of the first protrusion is equal to or more than 15% and equal to or less than 45% with respect to the mutual distance (W) of the partition walls facing each other, and a protrusion height (H2) of the second protrusion is equal to or more than 15% and equal to or less than 45% with respect to the mutual distance (W) of the partition walls facing each other.

3. The honeycomb structure according to claim 1, wherein a total sum of the protrusion height (H1) of the first protrusion and the protrusion height (H2) of the second protrusion is equal to or more than 30% and equal to or less than 90% with respect to the mutual distance (W) of the partition walls facing each other.

4. The honeycomb structure according to claim 1, wherein a width (Y1) of the first protrusion is smaller than a thickness (T1) of the partition wall at the one part at which the first protrusion is provided, and a width (Y2) of the second protrusion is smaller than a thickness (T2) of the partition wall at the other part at which the second protrusion is provided.

5. The honeycomb structure according to claim 1, wherein the total number of protrusions protruding into the one first cell is equal to or less than 4.

6. The honeycomb structure according to claim 1, wherein the number of pairs of two protrusions disposed at the opposed parts on the partition walls within the one first cell is equal to or less than 2.