Hood pedestrian energy absorber

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 8356857
  • Patent Number
    8,356,857
  • Date Filed
    Friday, March 4, 2011
    13 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, January 22, 2013
    11 years ago
Abstract
An energy absorbing system includes a hood with inner and outer panels defining a rear edge cavity, and a pair of polymeric energy absorbers in the cavity. The hood and energy absorber are tuned to minimize an HIC value when a pedestrian's head contacts the hood during an impact to absorb energy prior to the hood bottoming out on the plenum of the vehicle. The energy absorber is preferably made of a polymeric material capable of withstanding high temperatures associated with going through a paint over or e-coat process, such as high temperature nylon. The illustrated energy absorber has a hat-shaped cross section and includes criss-crossing flanges tuned to provide an optimal force-deflection curve during impact.
Description
BACKGROUND

The present invention relates to vehicle hoods, and more particularly relates to a hood assembly incorporating a crushable energy absorber to provide improved pedestrian safety against a vehicle impact.


In an attempt to prevent or minimize pedestrian injury during an impact with an automobile, it is desired that a pedestrian's head incur a reduced head impact criteria (HIC) value during the impact. In fact, there is a Global Technical Regulation (GTR) for pedestrian impacts that is in the process of being adopted. Additionally, the European and Japanese New Care Assessment Program (Euro NCAP) also evaluates vehicles in this regard.


However, any change for improved pedestrian safety during impact must also not adversely affect overall performance of a hood (i.e. “hood assembly”), nor aesthetics of the hood, including a time during normal operation of the vehicle, and also during a vehicle front end impact where the hood must satisfy occupant safety requirements. Thus, there are conflicting requirements on how to meet any such HIC value or GTR requirement.


SUMMARY OF THE PRESENT INVENTION

In one aspect of the present invention, an energy absorbing system is provided for a vehicle having a plenum or other under-hood hard structure. The energy absorbing system including a hood including a hood inner panel and a hood outer panel defining at least one cavity near a rear edge thereof; and further includes at least one energy absorber positioned in the at least one cavity and made of non-foamed polymeric material. The energy absorber has spaced sidewalls configured to crush and absorb energy prior to the outer layer of the hood bottoming out on the plenum or other under-hood hard structure of the vehicle.


In a narrower form, the energy absorber is made of a polymeric material capable of maintaining a shape even when at a temperature of at least 200 degrees centigrade, such that the energy absorber maintains the shape even when sent through a paint oven or e-coat process.


In another aspect of the present invention, an energy absorbing system for a vehicle having a hood, a plenum or other under-hood hard structure. The hood includes a hood inner panel and a hood outer panel defining at least one cavity, and at least one polymeric energy absorber positioned in the at least one cavity that is configured to minimize an HIC value when a pedestrian's head contacts the hood by absorbing energy during an impact into the pedestrian prior to the pedestrian's head bottoming out on the under-hood hard structure of the vehicle.


In another aspect of the present invention, an energy absorbing system is provided for a vehicle having a plenum or other under-hood hard structure. The energy absorbing system includes a hood including a hood outer panel and a hood inner panel defining at least one cavity, and at least one polymeric energy absorber positioned under the hood outer panel and attached to the hood, the energy absorber being configured to absorb energy from an impact from above such as will occur from a pedestrian's head during a pedestrian-vehicle accident, the energy absorber being made of a polymeric material.


In another aspect of the present invention, a method for optimizing head impact criteria (HIC) of a hood on a vehicle is provided comprising steps of: providing a hood including a hood outer panel and hood inner panel defining at least one cavity therebetween, and providing a non-foam energy absorber with walls configured to crush and absorb energy upon impact. The method further includes placing the non-foam energy absorber in the at least one cavity and assembling the hood inner and outer panels with the energy absorber to form a hood assembly; impact testing the hood assembly for HIC value; customizing the energy absorber by forming weakening sites on one or more of the walls of the energy absorber; and repeating the steps of providing a hood, providing an energy absorber, placing and assembling the hood, and impact testing.


In another aspect of the present invention, a method for optimizing head impact criteria (HIC) of a hood on a vehicle is provided comprising steps of: providing a hood including a hood inner panel and a hood outer panel that, when assembled, define at least one cavity and that is configured to aesthetically cover the under-hood hard structures of the vehicle. The method further includes attaching at least one polymeric energy absorber to the hood at a location under the hood where the presence of the energy absorber minimizes an HIC value when a pedestrian's head contacts the hood during an impact, the energy absorber being configured to absorb impact energy prior to the pedestrian's head bottoming out on the under-hood hard structure of the vehicle.


An object of the present invention is to provide an energy absorber, such as an injection molded or thermoformed polymeric energy absorber, attach to one or both of a hood inner and outer so as to absorb energy prior to the hood bottoming out on the plenum or other hard object of the vehicle.


An object of the present invention is to provide an energy absorber that minimizes the HIC value when a pedestrian's head contacts the hood or fender by absorbing energy during the impact prior to the head bottoming out on a hard surface or structure that is thereunder.


An object of the present invention is to provide an energy absorber that if sandwiched between a hood inner and outer, is configured to absorb energy from an impact against a top of a vehicle's hood, where the energy absorber is made of a polymeric material capable of withstanding high temperatures associated with going through a paint over or e-coat process.


These and other aspects, objects, and features of the present invention will be understood and appreciated by those skilled in the art upon studying the following specification, claims, and appended drawings.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF DRAWINGS


FIG. 1 is a top view of a vehicle front end, including a portion of a rear of the engine hood and a portion of the vehicle front windshield.



FIG. 2 is a side view of FIG. 1 taken along a longitudinal line of the vehicle, including a pedestrian's head shown in dashed lines.



FIGS. 3-9 are perspective views of different hood energy absorbers for optimizing HIC for pedestrian-vehicle impacts.



FIGS. 10-11 are top and perspective views of a hood and showing multiple locations of energy absorbers and also additional energy absorbers for use in the hood.





DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS

The present apparatus 20 (FIGS. 1-3) includes a vehicle hood 21 with energy absorber 22 positioned in a cavity 30 between the hood's inner and outer panels 23 and 24 near the plenum 25 of the vehicle (i.e., immediately in front of the vehicle's front windshield 26). The panels 23 and 24 are commonly held together using mastic adhesive 23′ and/or by mechanical means (such as by hemmed flanges along a perimeter of the hood), with the inner panel 23 stiffening the outer panel 24 for aesthetics and function. During a pedestrian impact, a pedestrian's head 27 may engage the hood 21 near a rear of the hood as the pedestrian falls/tumbles onto the hood. The force and stroke of the impact are related to the extent of injury caused. By limiting maximum force spikes and providing optimal resistance levels over the stroke distance and time period of impact, the amount of injury can be reduced.


As shown in FIG. 2, the illustrated inner and outer panels 23 and 24 define right and left cavities 30 near a rear of the hood 21. The energy absorber 22 is configured to fit into the cavity 30 and to engage the hood inner and outer panels 23-24 as it is crushed during a top-down impact from a pedestrian's head during a vehicle-pedestrian impact. Notably, a cross-sectional shape of the illustrated energy absorber 22 generally matches a cross-sectional shape of the cavity 30, such that top, bottom, and sides of the energy absorber 22 engage adjacent surfaces and structure forming the cavity 30. Potentially, an outer perimeter flange of the energy absorber 22 is positioned partially within a wedge-shaped edge of the cavity 30, such as is shown near the hood outer 24 in FIG. 2. Sidewalls of the energy absorber 22 extend at an angle between the hood inner and outer 23, 24, such as at an angle of 45 degrees to 90 degrees to the hood outer 24. The energy absorber 22, and in particular the sidewalls are positioned such that they crumple and bend at one or more locations in a manner maximizing energy absorption during the impact while minimizing load spikes and peaks, and while also minimizing HIC values. The energy absorber 22 can be made from different materials. A preferred material is nylon (or other heat resistant polymer), which is an injection molded non-foam polymer such that the side walls have a solid mass.


It is contemplated that the energy absorbers can be customized to have different structures and can be made of different materials to provide different functions, characteristics, and aesthetic appearances in the assembled hood. For example, the energy absorber 22 (FIG. 3) includes longitudinal edge flanges 34 and 35, a longitudinal middle flange 36, and transverse U-shaped “bridge” flanges 37 and 38. It is noted that the end-located flanges 37 can be made slightly larger than the other bridge flanges 38, and further that particular flanges 34-38 can be tuned to a provide a particular energy-absorbing profile and function. For example, the flanges 38 located away from the ends have an aperture 39 near their ends. In cross section, the energy absorber defines a hat shaped profile, with relatively flat top section matching the hood outer panel, relatively curved side sections matching a changing shape of the cavity between the inner and outer panels, and a relatively outwardly-extending flat edge flanges matching a narrow feature where the inner and outer panels join.


Energy absorber 22A (FIG. 4) includes edge flanges 34A-35A and three middle flanges 36A and almost double the number of bridge flanges 37A-38A. Also, the end flanges 37A are considerably smaller in width than the earlier end flange 37, and the end flanges 37A are similar in width to the middle flanges 38A. Also, flanges 38A include apertures 39A.


Energy absorber 22B (FIG. 5) is similar to energy absorber 22 in terms of the cross-sectional size and spacing and size of flanges 34B-38B. However, some flanges 38B have additional apertures 40B near an upper bend leading onto their top surface. These apertures 40B reduce an impact strength of the energy absorber 22B near a center area of the energy absorber 22B.


Energy absorbers 22C-22H (FIGS. 6-11) are similar to energy absorbers 22-22B in terms of their outer shape and profile, but the energy absorbers 22C-22H include side walls with less openings such that they have more mass and have the ability to absorb more energy (depending on a thickness and shape of the walls, as noted below). Specifically, energy absorber 22C (FIG. 6) includes a base (top) flange 50C, side walls 51C, and bottom wall 52C, with the walls 51C and 52C forming a crush box where the walls 51C crumple and collapse during an impact with multiple bends and folds for optimal energy absorption during the impact, while minimizing load spikes and peaks. Energy absorber 22D (FIG. 7) is similar to the energy absorber 22C (FIG. 6), and similar components are similarly identified except using a letter D. However, energy absorber 22D includes apertures 60D at top and bottom of corners 61D (i.e. at locations of juncture of the side walls 51D). The reason for apertures 60D is because with zero apertures, the corners 61D have increased beam strength over the side wall 51D itself, thus potentially leading to load spikes during an impact (depending on where a pedestrian's head strikes the hood). By providing apertures 60D, the beam strength is reduced, such that the entire crush box provides a more uniform expected impact strength regardless of the impact location. The energy absorber 22E (FIG. 8) is similar to energy absorber 22C (FIG. 6), except that the right and left components form right and left parts that are connected by a strap 62E, such that energy absorber 22E is molded as a single component that can be handled and assembled into the hood as a single unit. The energy absorber 22F (FIG. 9) is similar to energy absorber 22C, except that energy absorber 22F has four adjacent (smaller) crush boxes 63F formed in a same space as the single crush box of energy absorber 22C.



FIGS. 10-11 show a hood 21F having multiple energy absorbers 22F, 22G, and 22H generally located under the hood outer panel in an opening in the hood inner panel. For example, the energy absorber 22F is located along a rear edge of the hood 21F (near a vehicle's plenum area, but in an opening near a rear of the hood inner panel), and with the energy absorber 22G located partially in a downwardly-open triangular cavity defined by the hood inner panel under the hood outer panel (such as over the engine or other hard under-hood structures), and with the energy absorber 2211 positioned at a front of the hood 21F in an opening in the hood inner panel (such as near a hood latch or over the vehicle's bulkhead structure supporting a radiator). Flanges on a perimeter of the energy absorbers 22F, 22G and 2211 keep the energy absorbers attached to the hood assembly. Of course, it is contemplated that any of the energy absorbers could also be entirely within a cavity between the hood inner and outer panels.


The illustrated energy absorbers 22 are each about 35-40 mm tall, about 92 mm wide and about 365 mm long. The energy absorbers 22A-22J are similarly sized as necessary to fit within the cavity they are intended for. As illustrated, the hood 21 creates right and left cavities, but it is contemplated that a single cross-car cavity can exist and that a single energy absorber could extend completely cross car. Alternatively, it is contemplated that the illustrated two energy absorbers can be interconnected by a strap or tether or other connector so that they can be handled as a unit. The illustrated energy absorbers have a cross-sectional shape formed by slightly angled walls that are open and generally not orthogonal. It is contemplated that a cross sectional shape of the energy absorbers will generally match a cross-sectional shape of the cavity in which it is placed, but that this is not required necessarily unless the functional aspects require that. The hood and energy absorber as a designed assembly are tuned to provide a force-deflection profile minimizing an HIC value. The energy absorber is preferably made of a polymeric material. When the energy absorber will be attached to the hood assembly prior to coating, the energy absorber will be made of a polymer capable of withstanding high temperatures associated with going through a paint over or e-coat process, such as high temperature nylon. However, it is contemplated that the material could also be metal or other structural material that absorbs energy during collapse. Also, one advantage of connecting the energy absorber to the hood but not sandwiching it between the hood layers is that it won't need to go through an oven.


It is to be understood that variations and modifications can be made on the aforementioned structure without departing from the concepts of the present invention, and further it is to be understood that such concepts are intended to be covered by the following claims unless these claims by their language expressly state otherwise.

Claims
  • 1. An energy absorbing system for a vehicle having a plenum or other under-hood hard structure, comprising: a hood including a hood inner panel and a hood outer panel with interconnected portions defining at least one cavity and wedge-shaped edges near a rear edge thereof; andat least one energy absorber positioned in the at least one cavity and including a perimeter flange positioned in and retained within the wedge-shaped edges and made of non-foamed polymeric material, the energy absorber having spaced sidewalls configured to crush and absorb energy prior to the hood outer panel of the hood bottoming out on the plenum or other under-hood hard structure of the vehicle.
  • 2. The system defined in claim 1, wherein the energy absorber includes an open cross section having a shape of the cross section of the at least one cavity.
  • 3. The system defined in claim 1, wherein the energy absorber includes a transverse wall defining with the spaced sidewalls a hat-shaped cross section.
  • 4. The system defined in claim 1, wherein the energy absorber includes longitudinal edge flanges that fit partially between the hood inner panel and the hood outer panel.
  • 5. The system defined in claim 1, wherein the energy absorber includes a plurality of longitudinal and transverse flanges forming a matrix.
  • 6. The system defined in claim 1, wherein the energy absorber has a cross-sectional shape that is not orthogonal but that generally matches a cross-sectional shape of the cavity in which the energy absorber is positioned.
  • 7. The system defined in claim 1, wherein the hood and the energy absorber combine to provide a force-deflection profile minimizing an HIC value.
  • 8. The system defined in claim 1, wherein the energy absorber includes a polymeric material capable of maintaining a shape even when at a temperature of at least 200 degrees centigrade, such that the energy absorber can maintain the shape when going through a paint oven or e-coat process.
  • 9. The system defined in claim 8, wherein the polymeric material is a nylon polymer.
  • 10. An energy absorbing system for a vehicle having a hood, a plenum or other under-hood hard structure, comprising: the hood including a hood inner panel and a hood outer panel with interconnected portions defining at least one cavity with wedge-shaped edges; andat least one polymeric energy absorber positioned in the at least one cavity and including a perimeter flange positioned in and retained within the wedge-shaped edges and that is configured to minimize an HIC value when a pedestrian's head contacts the hood by absorbing energy during an impact into the pedestrian prior to the pedestrian's head bottoming out on the under-hood hard structure of the vehicle.
  • 11. The system defined in claim 10, wherein the polymeric material is capable of maintaining a shape even at a temperature of at least 200 degrees centigrade, such that the energy absorber maintains the shape even when going through a paint oven or e-coat process.
  • 12. An energy absorbing system for a vehicle having a plenum or other under-hood hard structure, comprising: a hood including a hood outer panel and a hood inner panel with interconnected portions defining at least one cavity with wedge-shaped edges; andat least one polymeric energy absorber including a perimeter flange positioned in and retained within the wedge-shaped edges and positioned under the hood outer panel but attached to the hood, the energy absorber being configured to absorb energy from an impact from above from a pedestrian's head during a pedestrian-vehicle accident, the energy absorber being made of a polymeric material.
  • 13. The system defined in claim 12, wherein the energy absorber includes at least one hollow crush lobe that protrudes generally upwardly when in a vehicle-mounted position.
  • 14. A method for optimizing head impact criteria (HIC) of a hood on a vehicle comprising steps of: providing a hood including a hood outer panel and hood inner panel with interconnected portions defining at least one cavity with wedge-shaped edges;providing a non-foam energy absorber with walls configured to crush and absorb energy upon impact and with a perimeter flange;placing the non-foam energy absorber in the at least one cavity and assembling the hood inner and outer panels with the perimeter flange of the energy absorber positioned in and retained within the wedge-shaped edges to form a hood assembly;impact testing the hood assembly for HIC value;customizing the energy absorber by forming weakening sites on one or more of the walls of the energy absorber; andrepeating the steps of providing a hood, providing an energy absorber, placing and assembling the hood, and impact testing.
  • 15. The method defined in claim 14, wherein the step of customizing by forming weakening sites includes forming at least one of apertures and slits in the walls.
  • 16. A method for optimizing head impact criteria (HIC) of a hood on a vehicle, the vehicle including under-hood hard structures, comprising steps of: providing a hood including a hood inner panel and a hood outer panel that, when assembled, define at least one cavity with wedge-shaped edges and that is configured to aesthetically cover the under-hood hard structures of the vehicle; andattaching at least one polymeric energy absorber to the hood at a location under the hood where the presence of the energy absorber minimizes an HIC value when a pedestrian's head contacts the hood during an impact, the energy absorber including at least one perimeter flange positioned in and retained at least in part by the wedge-shaped edges and being configured to absorb impact energy prior to the pedestrian's head bottoming out on the under-hood hard structure of the vehicle.
  • 17. The method defined in claim 16, wherein the step of attaching is done during or prior to assembly of the hood inner panel to the hood outer panel.
  • 18. The method defined in claim 17, wherein the step of attaching includes placing the energy absorber in a cavity defined between the hood inner panel and the hood outer panel.
  • 19. The method defined in claim 17, wherein the step of attaching includes placing the energy absorber in a location where the energy absorber is not covered by the hood inner panel.
CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATION

This application claims benefit under 35 USC §119(e) of provisional application Ser. No. 61/310,883, filed Mar. 5, 2010, entitled HOOD PEDESTRIAN ENERGY ABSORBER, the entire contents of which are incorporated herein by reference.

US Referenced Citations (117)
Number Name Date Kind
3933387 Salloum et al. Jan 1976 A
3938841 Glance et al. Feb 1976 A
4275912 Bayer Jun 1981 A
4925224 Smiszek May 1990 A
4941701 Loren Jul 1990 A
5139297 Carpenter et al. Aug 1992 A
5290078 Bayer et al. Mar 1994 A
5290079 Syamai Mar 1994 A
5425561 Morgan Jun 1995 A
5988305 Sakai et al. Nov 1999 A
5988713 Okamura et al. Nov 1999 A
6048022 Ishibashi et al. Apr 2000 A
6068320 Miyano May 2000 A
6082792 Evans et al. Jul 2000 A
6247745 Carroll, III et al. Jun 2001 B1
6315339 Devilliers et al. Nov 2001 B1
6398275 Hartel et al. Jun 2002 B1
6406081 Mahfet et al. Jun 2002 B1
6443513 Glance Sep 2002 B1
6467821 Hirota Oct 2002 B2
6575510 Weissenborn Jun 2003 B2
6609740 Evans Aug 2003 B2
6644701 Weissenborn et al. Nov 2003 B2
6663150 Evans Dec 2003 B1
6669251 Trappe Dec 2003 B2
6669252 Roussel et al. Dec 2003 B2
6672635 Weissenborn et al. Jan 2004 B2
6685243 Evans Feb 2004 B1
6715592 Suzuki et al. Apr 2004 B2
6726262 Marijnissen et al. Apr 2004 B2
6746061 Evans Jun 2004 B1
6758506 Malteste et al. Jul 2004 B2
6848730 Evans Feb 2005 B2
6848738 Kempf et al. Feb 2005 B2
6866313 Mooijman et al. Mar 2005 B2
6874832 Evans et al. Apr 2005 B2
6877785 Evans et al. Apr 2005 B2
6883627 Staines et al. Apr 2005 B1
6890009 Murata et al. May 2005 B2
6908127 Evans Jun 2005 B2
6920954 Hashimoto et al. Jul 2005 B2
6923494 Shuler et al. Aug 2005 B2
6938936 Mooijman et al. Sep 2005 B2
6949209 Zander et al. Sep 2005 B2
6962379 Minami et al. Nov 2005 B2
6994384 Shuler et al. Feb 2006 B2
6997490 Evans et al. Feb 2006 B2
7044515 Mooijman et al. May 2006 B2
7052056 Weissenborn et al. May 2006 B2
7073831 Evans Jul 2006 B2
7086690 Shuler et al. Aug 2006 B2
7090289 Koura Aug 2006 B2
7114765 Ishikawa et al. Oct 2006 B2
7131674 Evans et al. Nov 2006 B2
7134700 Evans Nov 2006 B2
7144054 Evans Dec 2006 B2
7144055 Kimura et al. Dec 2006 B2
7150495 Fayt et al. Dec 2006 B2
7159911 Nguyen et al. Jan 2007 B2
7163242 Shuler et al. Jan 2007 B2
7163243 Evans Jan 2007 B2
7172227 Weissenborn et al. Feb 2007 B2
7188876 Jaarda et al. Mar 2007 B2
7204545 Roux et al. Apr 2007 B2
7220374 Zander et al. May 2007 B2
7222896 Evans May 2007 B2
7222897 Evans et al. May 2007 B2
7234741 Reynolds et al. Jun 2007 B1
7278667 Mohapatra et al. Oct 2007 B2
7296833 Mohapatra et al. Nov 2007 B2
7325642 Roux et al. Feb 2008 B2
7399014 Mellis et al. Jul 2008 B2
7413239 Mitsuyama Aug 2008 B2
7467680 Mason Dec 2008 B2
7494165 Evans et al. Feb 2009 B2
7578548 Behr et al. Aug 2009 B2
7635157 Wang et al. Dec 2009 B2
7690720 Wang et al. Apr 2010 B2
7810877 Ishitobi Oct 2010 B2
7849559 Lindmark et al. Dec 2010 B2
7984943 Iwano et al. Jul 2011 B2
7988222 Fujimoto Aug 2011 B2
8016347 Uchino Sep 2011 B2
8052198 Seksaria et al. Nov 2011 B2
20020060462 Glance May 2002 A1
20020070584 Carroll, III et al. Jun 2002 A1
20030214151 Vismara et al. Nov 2003 A1
20030227183 Weissenborn et al. Dec 2003 A1
20040036302 Shuler et al. Feb 2004 A1
20040066048 Mooijman et al. Apr 2004 A1
20040174025 Converse et al. Sep 2004 A1
20040201255 Jonsson Oct 2004 A1
20040256867 Evans et al. Dec 2004 A1
20040262952 Kempf et al. Dec 2004 A1
20050057076 Roux et al. Mar 2005 A1
20050088016 Ito et al. Apr 2005 A1
20050269837 Carroll, III et al. Dec 2005 A1
20050280287 Koura Dec 2005 A1
20060001277 Mellis et al. Jan 2006 A1
20060006698 Ishikawa et al. Jan 2006 A1
20060018089 Chou Jan 2006 A1
20060220418 Behr et al. Oct 2006 A1
20060226679 Mairing Oct 2006 A1
20060261611 Mohapatra et al. Nov 2006 A1
20070069535 Mohapatra et al. Mar 2007 A1
20070210615 Tamada Sep 2007 A1
20080042454 Garnweidner Feb 2008 A1
20080088154 Rocheblave et al. Apr 2008 A1
20080185871 Ishiyama et al. Aug 2008 A1
20090025995 Wang et al. Jan 2009 A1
20090026807 Wang et al. Jan 2009 A1
20090195020 Wang et al. Aug 2009 A1
20090206618 Ralston et al. Aug 2009 A1
20090295193 Park Dec 2009 A1
20100045070 Rocheblave et al. Feb 2010 A1
20100140979 Seksaria et al. Jun 2010 A1
20110214932 Ralston et al. Sep 2011 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (3)
Number Date Country
2006-027288 Feb 2006 JP
2008-168844 Jul 2008 JP
2010-030501 Feb 2010 JP
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20110214932 A1 Sep 2011 US
Provisional Applications (1)
Number Date Country
61310883 Mar 2010 US