The invention relates to feeding signatures to a hopper on a binding line, and more particularly, to a signature hopper loader and method for delivering signatures to a hopper on a binding line.
A typical binding operation utilizes multiple hoppers or packer boxes that are each adapted to receive signatures from a source of signatures. The hoppers incrementally deliver individual signatures onto a binding line where complete books of signatures are gathered and carried onto another location for further processing to complete the binding process.
Signature hopper loaders are typically used to supply the signatures to the hopper. The advantages of automatically supplying signatures to the hopper instead of manually loading signatures into the hoppers are well known. A typical signature hopper loader receives a log of signatures at one end, and through a series of conveyors delivers a supply of signatures to the hopper.
The invention relates to an improved signature hopper loader and method for feeding signatures to a hopper on a binding line. The hopper loader includes a conveyor and a deblocker that work together to feed signatures to the hopper. The deblocker is positioned adjacent the conveyor such that the deblocker serves to laterally shift the signatures facilitating deblocking or separating of the signatures and facilitating alignment of the signatures. Deblocking of the signatures while they are traveling on the hopper loader enhances the reliability associated with supplying individual signatures to the hopper since the signatures are less likely to stick together. Aligning of the signatures improves downstream processing including uniform loading of the signatures to the hopper. Supplying individual signatures to the hopper in turn promotes feeding of individual signatures from the hopper onto the binding line minimizing double feeds, no feeds and misfeeds.
The present invention also relates to a method of transporting signatures along a travel path to a hopper on a binding line. The method includes transporting the signatures along the travel path and laterally displacing the signatures to facilitate deblocking and/or alignment of the signatures. Laterally displacing the signatures includes moving one edge of each signature into engagement with a deblocker.
Before the invention is explained in detail, it is to be understood that the invention is not limited in its application to the details of construction and the arrangements of the components set forth in the following description or illustrated in the drawings. The invention is capable of other forms and of being practiced or carried out in various ways. Also, it is to be understood that the phraseology and terminology as used herein is for the purpose of illustration and description and should not be regarded as limiting.
The first conveyor assembly 14 includes a first end 20, a second end 22 and a support plate 26 (
The first conveyor assembly 14 includes a first conveyor that includes two chains 34a, 34b which transport signatures longitudinally in the direction of Arrow A in
The first conveyor assembly 14 includes a horizontal section 36 that extends from the first end 20 and an arched declined section 37 which is positioned near the second end 22. The horizontal section 36 extends from the first end 20 until it meets the arched declined section 37 positioned on the second end 22. It should be noted that the first conveyor assembly 14 could have other configurations which are known in the art, such as comprising only a horizontal section for example, without departing from the scope of the present invention. A horizontal extension (not shown) may also be mounted adjacent to the first conveyor assembly 14 such that a greater number of signatures can be accommodated by the first conveyor assembly 14.
The second conveyor assembly 16 is mounted to the housing 12 so as to be pivotable with respect to the first conveyor assembly 14, although any conventional conveyor assembly could be used without departing from the scope of the present invention. The first conveyor assembly 14 and the second conveyor assembly 16 intersect at a transition point 42 (
The second conveyor assembly 16 preferably includes lateral signature guides 40a, 40b that are adjustable so as to accommodate different sizes of signatures between the guides 40a, 40b. The amount of space between the signature guides 40a, 40b on the second conveyor assembly 16 preferably matches the amount of space between the signature guides 28a, 28b on the first conveyor assembly 14. The second conveyor assembly 16 receives the signatures from the first conveyor assembly 14 and delivers the signatures in a shingled stream to a hopper (not shown) that is positioned at an exit end 48 of the second conveyor assembly 16.
The second conveyor assembly 16 includes a second conveyor that is made up of three belts. The three belts are preferably endless belts that travel in a loop between a first end 46 and a second end 48 (
Each belt in the second conveyor is driven at a speed that is preferably faster than the speed at which the belts 34a, 34b of the first conveyor 32 are driven such that the signatures are oriented into a shingled stream on the second conveyor assembly 16. The relative speed of the first conveyor and the second conveyor may be varied to modify the spacing in the shingled stream as the signatures travel on the second conveyor assembly 16.
During operation of the hopper loader 10, a sensor (not shown) monitors the amount of signatures in the hopper as is known in the art. When the amount of signatures in the hopper falls below a particular level, the chains 34a, 34b move signatures that have been loaded onto the first conveyor assembly 14 along a first travel path of the lateral edges of the signatures designated as Arrow B in
Laterally moving the signatures facilitates separating the signatures from one another for individual delivery to the second conveyor assembly 16 and subsequent individual feeding into the hopper from the exit end 48 of the second conveyor assembly 16. Without deblocking, signatures have a tendency to stick to one another due to static electricity. Laterally moving the signatures also facilitates aligning of the signatures to make downstream processing more uniform. It should be noted that the deblocker 56 may be positioned at any point along the first conveyor assembly 14 or the second conveyor assembly 16 without departing from the scope of the present invention.
The deblocker 56 may take many forms and is illustrated in
Referring to
The lateral guides 40a, 40b on the second conveyor assembly 16 are laterally offset from the guides 28a, 28b on the first conveyor assembly 14 to compensate for the lateral shift as the signatures pass by the deflecting wheel 58. The deflecting wheel 58 may be passive (i.e. free wheeling), driven in combination with the conveyor assemblies 14, 16, or driven independently from any other drive on the hopper loader 10. Air nozzles 72 may be used to blow air at the signatures from one or more orientations as the signatures pass by the deflecting wheel 58 to further facilitate deblocking the individual signatures.
The deflecting wheel 58 can be fabricated from a material such as mild steel and have a rough outer surface 62. The diameter of the wheel 58 can vary depending upon the particular application, for example, the wheel may have a diameter of 6 inches.
The present invention is not confined to the particular construction and arrangement of parts herein illustrated and described, but embraces all such modified forms that may come within the scope of the following claims. It would be apparent that many modifications and variations are possible in light of the above teachings. Therefore, it should be understood that the invention may be practiced in forms other than those specifically described. Alternative embodiments and variations of the present invention may suggest themselves to those skilled in the art upon reading the above description.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2715975 | Doane et al. | Aug 1955 | A |
3422947 | Kraft et al. | Jan 1969 | A |
3598399 | Cottrell | Aug 1971 | A |
3674258 | Maier, Jr. et al. | Jul 1972 | A |
3690650 | Maier, Jr. et al. | Sep 1972 | A |
3719267 | Reist et al. | Mar 1973 | A |
3741413 | Friel | Jun 1973 | A |
3832938 | Stapp et al. | Sep 1974 | A |
3880420 | Martin | Apr 1975 | A |
3894732 | Muller | Jul 1975 | A |
3904191 | Maier, Jr. et al. | Sep 1975 | A |
3945633 | Knopp | Mar 1976 | A |
3945635 | Marin | Mar 1976 | A |
3982749 | Stobb | Sep 1976 | A |
4008890 | Pulda | Feb 1977 | A |
4049260 | Szymborski | Sep 1977 | A |
4133523 | Berthelot | Jan 1979 | A |
4279555 | Rydell | Jul 1981 | A |
4396112 | von Wietersheim et al. | Aug 1983 | A |
4451967 | Stobb | Jun 1984 | A |
4518079 | Paelke | May 1985 | A |
4565285 | Koistinen | Jan 1986 | A |
4588180 | Ballestrazzi et al. | May 1986 | A |
4700941 | Shill | Oct 1987 | A |
4861014 | Martin | Aug 1989 | A |
4869486 | Scarpa et al. | Sep 1989 | A |
4973038 | Curley et al. | Nov 1990 | A |
5026038 | Weller et al. | Jun 1991 | A |
5026249 | Shill | Jun 1991 | A |
5027940 | Woodward | Jul 1991 | A |
5054763 | Achelpohl et al. | Oct 1991 | A |
5118249 | Romagnoli | Jun 1992 | A |
5131531 | Chambers | Jul 1992 | A |
5197590 | Prim et al. | Mar 1993 | A |
5238239 | LaChapelle | Aug 1993 | A |
5244199 | Wood | Sep 1993 | A |
5246102 | Rappen et al. | Sep 1993 | A |
5249788 | Helmstadter | Oct 1993 | A |
5282613 | Standerfer et al. | Feb 1994 | A |
5297785 | Ricciardi | Mar 1994 | A |
5308052 | Roch et al. | May 1994 | A |
5360102 | Schoning | Nov 1994 | A |
5380148 | Bates et al. | Jan 1995 | A |
5636832 | Honegger et al. | Jun 1997 | A |
6017028 | St. John et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2404627 | May 1975 | DE |
1542465 | Mar 1979 | GB |
2135978 | Sep 1984 | GB |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20030184006 A1 | Oct 2003 | US |