This patent relates to hoppers for the heat treatment of plastic granules and in particular concerns a new hopper with an improved process fluid distribution system.
The object of the present invention is a hopper with an improved system for distributing the process fluid and in particular the fluid used in hoppers for the treatment of granular materials, and a method for distributing the process fluid in the hopper.
In particular, the invention covered by this patent application can also be applied in the field of systems and devices for the dehumidification of plastic materials, and for their subsequent melting and molding in transformation machines.
In particular, the invention that is the object of this patent application relates to a system for the injection and distribution of fluid inside the hopper used by way of example, but not exclusively, for the heating and dehumidification of plastic materials or other granular materials such as food products, chemical pharmaceuticals, coal agglomerates, cement products, etc.
The proposed system therefore generally applies to those processes which generally use a fluid having dew point (DP) values and T° temperatures, by way of example, but not exclusively, DP<0° C. and temperatures up to T°=200° C., and in particular to heating and dehumidification systems for the plastic materials where this fluid is used to preheat and dehumidify the plastic materials inside a special hopper.
As is known, plastic material, in the form of granules or flakes, is transformed into finished or semi-finished products by heating, melting, molding or extrusion.
As is also known, plastics, due to their hygroscopicity, contain water molecules; during melting processes, water molecules can compromise the polymeric structure of the plastic materials, causing surface or structural defects of a finished or semi-finished product, compromising the quality of the final product.
It follows that, in order to prevent the formation of bubbles and cavities in the plastic material and any alterations in its chemical structure, it is absolutely necessary to control the temperature and moisture content of the granules and thus the heating and dehumidification process, during the transformation of plastic materials.
In order to extract moisture from plastic material, various drying fluids are currently used to treat it.
In the dehumidification systems currently used, a certain amount of plastic material to be dehumidified is introduced into a hopper in which the material is subjected to the action of the drying fluid heated to a suitable temperature, called process fluid, which heats the material and removes the moisture.
It is known that the process fluid is conveyed by process fluid generators, typically air or air/nitrogen mixtures, known in jargon as the “dryer.”
Once the fluid is introduced into the container where the plastic material is stored, it passes through the plastic mass, heating it and removing the moisture.
Achieving the optimal degree of dehumidification for a given plastic material that will subsequently be subjected to melting is conditioned by numerous factors including the amount of time the material remains in the hopper, the flow rate of the process fluid, the treatment temperature, and the dew point of the process fluid itself.
To modify the residual moisture that the granular material retains at the end of the dehumidification treatment, the amount of time it remains in the hopper and the characteristics of the process fluid can be altered, as can the specific flow rate, temperature, and dew point.
Note that the dew point is that thermodynamic state in which, at a certain temperature and a certain pressure, a fluid-vapor mixture becomes saturated with water vapor.
By way of example, the description of a typical dehumidification process in PET transformation processes is provided below.
As is well known, a dehumidification fluid (air/nitrogen mixtures etc.) with a DP indicatively in the range of −80° C. to −30° C. and temperatures in the range of 80° C. and 200° C. are used for the transformation processes of plastic materials.
Table 1 below shows indicative values of the parameters of a known process by way of example.
Inside the dryer, there are special columns containing the adsorbent material capable of retaining the moisture present in the fluid.
Generally, the fluid leaving the dryer is conveyed along the delivery pipe to a heater and after having passed through the plastic material contained in special hoppers, it returns to the dryer along the return pipe, to transfer the moisture extracted from the material to the columns.
The process fluid is then sent back by the pump along the circuit to ensure that the material reaches the required temperature/humidity conditions. For the aforementioned reasons, the optimal condition is when the process fluid entering the hopper has a specific DP<−30° C. and, for PET, a temperature >160° C.
In the prior art, the distribution of the process air inside the dehumidification hopper is carried out using a diffuser located in the lower portion of the hopper. (
The diffuser adopted in the prior art has two fundamental functions: to guarantee the homogeneous descent of the material and simultaneously guarantee the homogeneous distribution of the process air inside the hopper.
This diffuser, for example the one shown in
The diffuser is typically supported by support brackets mounted between the lower cone and the conical wall of the lower part of the hopper. These brackets are in fact thermal bridges that contribute to limiting the effectiveness and homogeneity of the heat applied to the material and particularly the material present in the lower part of the hopper.
In the absence of the upper cone of the diffuser, the material descends predominantly towards the center with completely different vertical speeds compared to the speed of the material descending on the periphery.
This results in shorter transit times and thus insufficient heating and dehumidification of the treated material.
The perforated inverted cone is also used to introduce the process fluid at the lowest point, in a low pressure zone, to create the most effective countercurrent flow possible.
Crystallizers are also known in the prior art, an example of which is shown in
Therefore, crystallizers use high process flow rates and a suction shaft placed inside the hopper to keep the material and the relative process fluid mixed, thus this system is significantly different than “static” hoppers.
We can therefore integrate the optimal configuration of the dehumidification hopper, as defined in the prior art, with a nozzle in which the position of the valve shutter determines the internal flow conditions.
In the prior art, static hoppers, that is, those without moving elements placed inside them, have achieved a rather standardized configuration over time that provides for the diffuser to be fed from the top of the hopper, through a vertical pipe located inside the hopper and generally connected to an external heating chamber.
In certain configurations, and in particular in small hoppers, the process fluid inlet can be placed at the bottom, at the height of the cone, with some advantages in terms of thermal efficiency.
However, the drawback of that configuration relates to the lack of uniformity generated when the material descends and in the distribution of the process fluid, with the potential formation of stagnation points and degradation of the material.
In large static hoppers, where this drawback is even more evident, this solution is not used to date. Therefore, if it can be said that the prior art comprises techniques able to achieve acceptable levels of homogeneity in the descent of the material and in the distribution of the process fluid, the problems related to the optimal thermal exchange and consequent distribution of the heat in the material descending through the hopper still remain.
In fact, the material descending at the periphery of the hopper, in contact with its metal surfaces, even when the latter are insulated, are cooler zones since they are the outer walls of the hopper.
It follows that, in particular in the lower part of the hopper, normally conical with the vertex facing downwards, there is a large temperature gradient between the material near the diffuser cone and that near the conical wall of the lower part of the hopper. In fact, this material arrives at that point already at lower temperatures than the material arriving from the center and the temperature gap is unable to be recovered, indeed it only increases in the last part of the descent inside the lower conical part of the hopper.
Since it is necessary to guarantee the material leaving the hopper a minimum temperature, as well as an optimal moisture content, it is necessary to increase the transit time in the hopper in order to allow the coldest portion of the material to reach this minimum temperature.
In this case, in the presence of delicate or low quality polymers such as recycled materials, it is easy to trigger polymer degradation processes, which lead to quality problems in the finished product.
Alternatively, it is possible to adjust the airflow rate by increasing it appropriately in order to provide the necessary energy in a limited time.
However, in this case, the efficiency of the system is compromised, since the energy consumption increases both to heat the process fluid in the heater and to cool it in the heat exchangers installed before the dryer.
In this second case, in which it is necessary to operate with limited transit times in the hopper, a further energy problem arises in the solutions adopted in the prior art.
In fact, reduced transit times in the hopper lead to a reduction of material levels. Thus, a remarkable portion of the central hot fluid inlet pipe is exposed to the cooling action of the fluid as it leaves the material that can be seen as a sort of thermal bypass.
As a result, the temperature of the incoming fluid decreases with respect to the required value while the temperature of the outgoing fluid increases even to significant values.
Typically, for example for PET, there is an increase of the return temperatures from its standard 80° C. to 120-130° C.
Thus, the increase in energy consumption is significant with the resulting economic consequences.
Another phenomenon emerging from hoppers made according to the prior art, relates to the difficulty controlling the temperature of the process fluid leaving the heating chamber.
In fact, to reduce heat loss, the heater is located next to the hopper near the inlet point, with the temperature control probes generally installed at point T1, with reference to
This condition involves a certain instability in the reading of temperatures, associated with stratification phenomena that are difficult to predict, such as to make it difficult to thermoregulate the process.
In order to overcome this phenomenon, it is generally necessary to install turbulators and thermal destratifiers that exacerbate both the costs and the pressure drops and which also result in a significant increase in the size of the equipment.
As noted, the use of recycled resins comes with the need to prevent the thermal degradation of the resins during the dehumidification process.
This can be achieved by limiting the working temperature in the hopper, which may result in a dehumidified polymer that is not hot enough to be transformed.
This problem can be solved by equipping the system with a second small hopper, known as a booster in jargon, located downstream of the main hopper and where the material encounters a very hot air flow for a short time before being forwarded to the processing machine.
Thus, the process tends to be split into a dehumidification and preheating phase at 80-90% of the required temperature and a quick final heating phase to the required temperature.
This solution typically involves a transport system from the primary hopper to the booster, with a high temperature transport pump, insulated lines, high temperature closed circuit ventilation pump, electrical power panel, and various ancillary systems.
Therefore, this embodiment results in a significant increase in costs and energy consumption, due to the inevitable dispersions inherent to the system.
The object of the invention that is the subject of this patent application is therefore to optimize the working conditions in the hopper, reduce heat losses, and offer the possibility of working with polymers sensitive to thermal degradation, with a simultaneous significant reduction in energy consumption.
To reduce heat loss in the working phases with reduced material levels, the process fluid inlet pipe located above the diffuser inside the hopper was eliminated.
To reduce the cooling of the material in the lower conical portion of the hopper, the lower surface of the hopper must be heated.
To reduce heat loss at the diffuser cone, the thermal bridges represented by the diffuser cone support structures resting on the lower part of the hopper were reduced.
To increase the heat exchange in the lower conical part of the hopper, the hot surfaces of the diffuser cone were increased.
To improve the distribution of the process fluid near the diffuser cone, the active surface of the fluid inlet was increased, without generating preferential pathways, however.
The stratification phenomena in electric heaters used in the prior art are increased by natural convection phenomena that occur when the air introduced into the heater from the lower portion heats up when going up along the heater itself.
In particular, at low flow rates, the fluid tends to accelerate vertically naturally by convection, maintaining a state of relative stability.
If the inlet direction is reversed by entering from above, in particular at low flow rates, the inlet flow opposes convective movements and generates turbulence that facilitates mixing.
This results in the greater homogeneity of the outbound temperature.
An initial improvement regarding temperature uniformity of the fluid entering the diffuser cone was achieved by eliminating the vertical inlet duct.
In fact, as can also be seen with direct measurements, the temperature in the peripheral part of the inlet pipe of the embodiments of the prior art can be up to 10-20° C. lower than that measured at the center of the pipe itself.
It follows that, particularly at low flow rates and under stable flow conditions, even if not laminar, the base of the diffuser cone has lower temperatures than those measured at the vertex.
This does not help to ensure temperature uniformity of the material.
In order to reduce these stratification phenomena inside the diffuser cone, a mixing chamber was added where the process fluid flow coming from the heater can mix well before being sent inside the diffuser cone, located inside the hopper.
Referring to the various points addressed above, a new hopper configuration was developed, with an improved process fluid distribution system.
The new hopper comprises a casing with a lower part, or bottom part, generally conical or with a tapered shape with its vertex facing downwards.
Around the lower part of the hopper, an annular mixing chamber is installed, with insulated outer walls, inside which the process fluid is blown. If provided, said process fluid comes from a heater.
Inside the hopper, near said lower part, a diffuser is installed which consists of a hollow body on the wall of which there are holes that connect the interior of the diffuser with the interior of the hopper.
Said diffuser has, for example, the shape of the diffusers of the prior art, that is, comprising an upper cone and a perforated lower cone.
Diffuser supports are also provided, which are installed between the diffuser and the lower part of the hopper.
Said mixing chamber has the dual function of mixing the incoming flow of process fluid to have stable temperatures before its introduction into the diffuser cone of the hopper, and heating the entire lower portion of the hopper, which currently represents a cold zone of the system.
Said lower portion of the hopper as a heat dispersing element thus becomes an active component of the heating system because when heated by the hot process fluid introduced into the mixing chamber, it transmits heat to the material contained in the hopper and in particular to the material present in the lower portion of the hopper.
Even the diffuser supports, which in the prior art are detrimental thermal bridges with the external environment, become active components of the heating system.
In fact, they comprise ducts that connect the interior of said mixing chamber with the interior of said diffuser. The hot process fluid flows from the chamber and, through said ducts of the supports, reaches the interior of the diffuser.
The diffuser cone supports can also be used to distribute a part of the process fluid directly to the interior of the hopper, through holes made in the ducts, thus increasing the diffusion of the fluid into the material descending in the hopper.
The preferred embodiment, which feeds the diffuser cone from the annular chamber, also allows the supply pipe to be eliminated which, in the prior art, is located inside the hopper, above the diffuser.
It follows that the dispersion generated at the top of the hopper in situations of partial loads, that is, with a hopper fill level below 100%, is in fact eliminated.
The process fluid inlet in the lower portion of the hopper makes it easy to position the air inlet in the upper portion of the electric heater, if present, with the following advantages.
In this case, therefore, the stratification phenomena in the heater and therefore the temperature inconsistencies often found in the systems of the prior art are reduced.
The inlet of the process fluid into the lower portion of the hopper provides an additional advantage, which is that it can be used in systems with differentiated process temperatures, for example as in the cases described above, with reference to booster systems.
It is in fact possible, in a fairly simple way, to take a part of the process fluid flow from the annular chamber or downstream of the heater and send it to a chamber or auxiliary compartment possibly located below the hopper, at or near the point of discharge of the material from the hopper.
The fluid passes through an auxiliary heater that increases the temperature of the fluid.
The hot flow from this chamber or auxiliary compartment may not be sent to the dryer, with the consequent increase of the cooling effect on the material, but may be introduced into the lower portion of the hopper, contributing to further heat and homogenize the temperature of the material present in the hopper.
In fact, in its ascent along the lower portion, the fluid coming from the auxiliary compartment tends to go to the periphery of the hopper, since the air leaving the diffuser cone generates positive pressure in the central area.
Therefore, it is possible to obtain a secondary heating effect on the material located in the periphery of the hopper which, in hoppers made according to the prior art, tends to be slightly cooler than that located in the center.
In this case, it is also possible to greatly simplify the architecture of dual temperature systems with clear economic and management advantages.
Thanks to the system of the invention for the distribution of the process fluid inside a hopper for the treatment of granular materials, it is therefore possible to reduce, if not eliminate, many of the drawbacks inherent to the systems made according to the prior art, improving the quality and reliability of the process.
The technical characteristics of the invention, according to the aforementioned objects, can be found in the content of the claims and the advantages thereof will be better clarified in the detailed description that follows, made with reference to the attached drawings that represent one or more embodiments by way of non-limiting examples:
In the description and in the claims reference is made to a process flow for carrying out the dehumidification of plastic or granular material; it is understood that the expression “process fluid” is not limited to the use of air but also includes the use of other treatment fluids suitable for the purpose and that this process fluid could also be used for purposes other than the dehumidification of the plastic material such as the treatment of other granular materials like cereals, minerals, vegetables, and the like.
In accordance with a general embodiment of the invention, the dehumidification system shown in
The heater (9) may be based on different technologies (electricity, gas, etc.) and may also be placed in different positions of the dehumidification system, depending on specific needs.
The standard dehumidification system typically used in the usual practice also includes:
Generally, the process fluid leaving the dryer (1) flows through the delivery pipe (7) to a heater (9).
From the heater (9) the fluid is sent inside the hopper (15) through a generic diffuser (10) usually made of a smooth upper cone (11) and a perforated lower cone (12) so as to pass through the plastic material (16) contained therein.
When the process fluid loaded with the humidity absorbed from the plastic material (13) reaches the top of the hopper (12), it passes through the return pipe (22) with a specific flow rate (Q) and is then sent back to the dryer (1).
The fluid is once again pumped by the pump (4) into the columns (5), along the delivery circuit (7), to the heater (9), hopper (15) and return circuit (23), to ensure that the material (16) reaches the temperature/humidity conditions required by the transformation machine (22).
The hopper (15) comprises a bottom or lower portion (13) for example substantially conical or with a tapered shape with its vertex facing downwards.
As shown in
Said lower portion (13) of the hopper (15), in contrast, may be suitably made with an uninsulated wall, to improve the heat exchange between the mixing chamber (24) and the interior of the hopper (15).
A preferable embodiment of the present invention has said lower portion (13) with closed walls, that is, without openings that connect said mixing chamber (24) directly with the interior of the hopper (15).
Said at least one diffuser (10) may be made of a smooth upper cone (11) and a perforated lower cone (12) as in the prior art, without excluding any embodiment not shown in the attached figures.
Said at least one mixing chamber (24) may or may not be fluidically connected with said diffuser (10), and where the means of connection may be implemented in different ways, only some of which are indicatively referred to in the claims.
The object of the present patent application is therefore to use a fluid to heat at least the lower portion (13) of the hopper (15), in order to reduce heat dissipation and optimize the process.
In particular but not exclusively, the fluid used for heating part of the hopper may be the process fluid exiting the heater (9), without excluding the possibility of using the return process fluid (23) or other available fluid.
In a first embodiment (
Said brackets (14) are for example tubular or comprise ducts that connect the interior of said mixing chamber (24) with the interior of said diffuser (10).
In a preferred embodiment (
In a further preferred embodiment (
In a further preferred embodiment (
In a further preferred embodiment (
In
With the same ambient conditions (Ta=35° C.) and heater outlet fluid conditions (T1=180° C.), in the embodiment of
In contrast, in the embodiment of the invention in
Similarly, see
Therefore, with reference to the preceding descriptions and the attached drawings the following claims are made.
| Number | Date | Country | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 102022000004925 | Mar 2022 | IT | national |
| Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| PCT/IB2022/052431 | 3/17/2022 | WO |