The present technology is generally directed to horizontal heat recovery coke ovens having monolith crowns.
Coke is a solid carbon fuel and carbon source used to melt and reduce iron ore in the production of steel. In one process, known as the “Thompson Coking Process,” coke is produced by batch feeding pulverized coal to an oven that is sealed and heated to very high temperatures for 24 to 48 hours under closely-controlled atmospheric conditions. Coking ovens have been used for many years to convert coal into metallurgical coke. During the coking process, finely crushed coal is heated under controlled temperature conditions to devolatilize the coal and form a fused mass of coke having a predetermined porosity and strength. Because the production of coke is a batch process, multiple coke ovens are operated simultaneously.
The melting and fusion process undergone by the coal particles during the heating process is an important part of coking. The degree of melting and degree of assimilation of the coal particles into the molten mass determine the characteristics of the coke produced. In order to produce the strongest coke from a particular coal or coal blend, there is an optimum ratio of reactive to inert entities in the coal. The porosity and strength of the coke are important for the ore refining process and are determined by the coal source and/or method of coking.
Coal particles or a blend of coal particles are charged into hot ovens, and the coal is heated in the ovens in order to remove volatile matter (“VM”) from the resulting coke. The coking process is highly dependent on the oven design, the type of coal, and the conversion temperature used. Typically, ovens are adjusted during the coking process so that each charge of coal is coked out in approximately the same amount of time. Once the coal is “coked out” or fully coked, the coke is removed from the oven and quenched with water to cool it below its ignition temperature. Alternatively, the coke is dry quenched with an inert gas. The quenching operation must also be carefully controlled so that the coke does not absorb too much moisture. Once it is quenched, the coke is screened and loaded into rail cars or trucks for shipment.
Because coal is fed into hot ovens, much of the coal feeding process is automated. In slot-type or vertical ovens, the coal is typically charged through slots or openings in the top of the ovens. Such ovens tend to be tall and narrow. Horizontal non-recovery or heat recovery type coking ovens are also used to produce coke. In the non-recovery or heat recovery type coking ovens, conveyors are used to convey the coal particles horizontally into the ovens to provide an elongate bed of coal.
As the source of coal suitable for forming metallurgical coal (“coking coal”) has decreased, attempts have been made to blend weak or lower quality coals (“non-coking coal”) with coking coals to provide a suitable coal charge for the ovens. One way to combine non-coking and coking coals is to use compacted or stamp-charged coal. The coal may be compacted before or after it is in the oven. In some embodiments, a mixture of non-coking and coking coals is compacted to greater than 50 pounds per cubic foot in order to use non-coking coal in the coke making process. As the percentage of non-coking coal in the coal mixture is increased, higher levels of coal compaction are required (e.g., up to about 65 to 75 pounds per cubic foot). Commercially, coal is typically compacted to about 1.15 to 1.2 specific gravity (sg) or about 70-75 pounds per cubic foot.
Horizontal Heat Recovery (“HHR”) ovens have a unique environmental advantage over chemical byproduct ovens based upon the relative operating atmospheric pressure conditions inside HHR ovens. HHR ovens operate under negative pressure, whereas chemical byproduct ovens operate at a slightly positive atmospheric pressure. Both oven types are typically constructed of refractory bricks and other materials in which creating a substantially airtight environment can be a challenge because small cracks can form in these structures during day-to-day operation. Chemical byproduct ovens are kept at a positive pressure to avoid oxidizing recoverable products and overheating the ovens. Conversely, HHR ovens are kept at a negative pressure, drawing in air from outside the oven to oxidize the coal's VM and to release the heat of combustion within the oven. It is important to minimize the loss of volatile gases to the environment, so the combination of positive atmospheric conditions and small openings or cracks in chemical byproduct ovens allow raw coke oven gas (“COG”) and hazardous pollutants to leak into the atmosphere. Conversely, the negative atmospheric conditions and small openings or cracks in the HHR ovens or locations elsewhere in the coke plant simply allow additional air to be drawn into the oven or other locations in the coke plant so that the negative atmospheric conditions resist the loss of COG to the atmosphere.
HHR ovens have traditionally been unable to turn down their operation (e.g., their coke production) significantly below their designed capacity without potentially damaging the ovens. This restraint is linked to temperature limitations in the ovens. More specifically, traditional HHR ovens are at least partially made of silica brick. When a silica oven is built, burnable spacers are placed between the bricks in the oven crown to allow for brick expansion. Once the oven is heated, the spacers burn away and the bricks expand into adjacency. Once HHR silica brick ovens are heated, they are never allowed to drop below the silica brick thermally-volume-stable temperature, the temperature above which silica is generally volume-stable (i.e., does not expand or contract). If the bricks drop below this temperature, the bricks start to contract. Since the spacers have burned out, a traditional crown can contract up to several inches upon cooling. This is potentially enough movement for the crown bricks to start to shift and potentially collapse. Therefore, enough heat must be maintained in the ovens to keep the bricks above the thermally-volume-stable temperature. This is the reason why it has been stated that a HHR oven can never be turned off. Because the ovens cannot be significantly turned down, during periods of low steel and coke demand, coke production must be sustained. Further, it can be difficult to perform maintenance on heated HHR ovens. Other portions of the coke oven system can suffer from similar thermal and/or structural limitations. For example, the crown of a sole flue running under the oven floor can collapse or otherwise suffer from heaving of the oven floor, ground settling, thermal or structural cycling, or other fatigue. These stresses can cause bricks in the sole flue to shift and drop out.
The present technology is generally directed to horizontal heat recovery coke ovens having monolith crowns. In some embodiments, a HHR coke oven includes a monolith crown that spans the width of the oven between opposing oven sidewalls. The monolith expands upon heating and contracts upon cooling as a single structure. In further embodiments, the crown comprises a thermally-volume-stable material. In various embodiments, the monolith and thermally-volume-stable features can be used in combination or alone. These designs can allow the oven to be turned down below traditionally-feasible temperatures while maintaining the structural integrity of the crown.
Specific details of several embodiments of the technology are described below with reference to
In operation, volatile gases emitted from the coal positioned inside the oven chamber 185 collect in the crown 180 and are drawn downstream in the overall system into downcomer channels 112 formed in one or both sidewalls 175. The downcomer channels 112 fluidly connect the oven chamber 185 with a sole flue 116 positioned beneath the oven floor 160. The sole flue 116 includes a plurality of side-by-side runs 117 that form a circuitous path beneath the oven floor 160. While the runs 117 in
Coke is produced in the ovens 105 by first loading coal into the oven chamber 185, heating the coal in an oxygen-depleted environment, driving off the volatile fraction of coal, and then oxidizing the VM within the oven 105 to capture and utilize the heat given off. The coal volatiles are oxidized within the ovens 105 over an extended coking cycle and release heat to regeneratively drive the carbonization of the coal to coke. The coking cycle begins when the front door 165 is opened and coal is charged onto the oven floor 160. The coal on the oven floor 160 is known as the coal bed. Heat from the oven (due to the previous coking cycle) starts the carbonization cycle. Roughly half of the total heat transfer to the coal bed is radiated down onto the top surface of the coal bed from the luminous flame of the coal bed and the radiant oven crown 180. The remaining half of the heat is transferred to the coal bed by conduction from the oven floor 160, which is convectively heated from the volatilization of gases in the sole flue 116. In this way, a carbonization process “wave” of plastic flow of the coal particles and formation of high strength cohesive coke proceeds from both the top and bottom boundaries of the coal bed.
Typically, each oven 105 is operated at negative pressure so air is drawn into the oven during the reduction process due to the pressure differential between the oven 105 and the atmosphere. Primary air for combustion is added to the oven chamber 185 to partially oxidize the coal volatiles, but the amount of this primary air is controlled so that only a portion of the volatiles released from the coal are combusted in the oven chamber 185, thereby releasing only a fraction of their enthalpy of combustion within the oven chamber 185. The primary air is introduced into the oven chamber 185 above the coal bed. The partially combusted gases pass from the oven chamber 185 through the downcomer channels 112 into the sole flue 116 where secondary air is added to the partially combusted gases. As the secondary air is introduced, the partially combusted gases are more fully combusted in the sole flue 116, thereby extracting the remaining enthalpy of combustion, which is conveyed through the oven floor 160 to add heat to the oven chamber 185. The fully or nearly fully combusted exhaust gases exit the sole flue 116 through the uptake channels 114. At the end of the coking cycle, the coal has coked out and has carbonized to produce coke. The coke can be removed from the oven 105 through the rear door utilizing a mechanical extraction system. Finally, the coke is quenched (e.g., wet or dry quenched) and sized before delivery to a user.
As will be discussed in further detail below with reference to
In some embodiments, the crown 180 is at least partially made of a thermally-volume-stable material such that upon heating or cooling the oven chamber 185, the crown 180 does not adjust in position. As with a monolith design, a crown 180 made of a thermally-volume-stable material allows the oven 105 to be shut down or turned down without individual bricks in the crown 180 contracting and collapsing into the oven chamber 185. While the term “thermally-volume-stable material” is used herein, this term can refer to materials that are zero-expansion, zero-contraction, near-zero-expansion, and/or near-zero-contraction, or a combination of these characteristics, upon heating and/or cooling. In some embodiments, the thermally-volume-stable materials can be pre-cast or pre-fabricated into designed shapes, including as individual bricks or monolith segments. Further, in some embodiments, the thermally-volume-stable materials can be repeatedly heated and cooled without affecting the expandability characteristics of the material, while in other embodiments the material can be heated and/or cooled only once before undergoing a phase or material change that affects subsequent expandability characteristics. In a particular embodiment the thermally-volume-stable material is a fused silica material, zirconia, refractory material, or a ceramic material. In further embodiments, other portions of the oven 105 additionally or alternately can be formed of thermally-volume-stable materials. For example, in some embodiments, the lintel for the door 165 comprises such a material. When using thermally-volume-stable materials, traditional-sized bricks or a monolith structure can be used as the crown 180.
In some embodiments, the monolith or thermally-volume-stable designs can be used at other points in the plant 100, such as over the sole flue 116, as part of the oven floor 160 or sidewalls 175, or other portions of the oven 105. In any of these locations, the monolith or thermally-volume-stable embodiments can be used as an individual structure or as a combination of sections. For example, a crown 180 or oven floor 160 can comprise multiple monolith segments and/or multiple segments made of thermally-volume-stable material. In another embodiment, as shown in
In
In various embodiments, the crown 181 can comprise a single monolith segment or a plurality of individual segments (e.g., the individual arched portions 181a, 181b) that are separated by an optional joint 186 shown in broken line. Accordingly, a single monolith crown 181 can cover one run or a plurality of adjacent runs in the sole flue 126. As mentioned above, in further embodiments the crown 181 can have shapes other than an arched underside with a flat top. For example, the crown 181 can be entirely flat, entirely arched or curved, or other combinations of these characteristics. While the crown 181 has been described for use with the sole flue 126 of
The design of the oven 205 provides structural support for such expansion and contraction upon heating and cooling. More specifically, the sidewalls 175 that support the crown 280 can have a width W that is sufficiently greater than the width of the crown 280 to fully support the crown 280 as the crown 280 moves laterally between the contracted 280a and expanded 280b configurations. For example, the width W can be at least the width of the crown 280 plus the distance D of expansion. Therefore, when the crown 280 expands or is translated laterally outward upon heating, and contracts and translates laterally inward again upon cooling, the sidewalls 175 maintain support of the crown 280. The crown 280 can likewise expand or translate longitudinally outward upon heating, and contract and translate longitudinally inward upon cooling. The front and back walls (or door frames) of the oven 205 can accordingly be sized to accommodate this shifting.
In further embodiments, the crown 280 can rest on a crown footing other than directly on the sidewalls 175. Such a footing can be coupled to or an independent structure of the sidewalls 175. In still further embodiments, the entire oven may be made of expanding and contracting material and can expand and contract with the crown 280, and may not require sidewalls having a width as large as the width W shown in
In other embodiments, the crown 281 and sidewalls 177 can interface in other patterns, such as recesses, slots, overlapping portions, and/or interlocking features. For example,
While the illustrated interfacing feature is along a joint 486 that is generally parallel to the sidewalls 175, in further embodiments the interfacing feature can be used at a joint that is generally perpendicular to the sidewalls 175. For example, any of the interfacing features described above could be used at the joints 284 between the crown segments 282 of
At block 520 the method 500 includes heating the coke oven chamber. In some embodiments, the oven chamber is heated above the thermally-volume-stable temperature of a given material (e.g., above 1,200° F. in the case of a silica oven). The method 500 then includes turning down the coke oven below a thermally-volume-stable temperature at block 530. For materials having a thermally-volume-stable temperature, like silica, this comprises dropping the oven temperature below this temperature (e.g., below 1,200° F. in the case of a silica oven). For thermally-volume-stable materials, like fused silica, or materials not having a thermally-volume-stable temperature, like alumina, the step of turning down the coke oven below a thermally volume-stable temperature comprises turning down the oven temperature to any lesser temperature. In particular embodiments, turning down the coke oven comprises turning off the coke oven entirely. In further embodiments, turning down the coke oven comprises turning down the coke oven to a temperature of about 1,200° F. or less. In some embodiments, the coke oven is turned down to 50% or less of the maximum operating capacity. At block 540, the method 500 further includes maintaining the coke oven structure, including the integrity of the oven crown. The oven is thus turned down without crown collapse as experienced in traditional ovens. In some embodiments, the oven is turned down without causing significant crown contraction. The method described above can be applied to a coking chamber, sole flue, or other portion of the oven.
The following Examples are illustrative of several embodiments of the present technology.
1. A coke oven chamber, comprising:
2. The coke oven chamber of example 1 wherein the monolith crown comprises a plurality of monolith portions spanning from the first sidewall to the second sidewall, wherein the plurality of monolith portions are positioned generally adjacent to one another between the front wall and the back wall.
3. The coke oven chamber of example 1 wherein:
4. The coke oven chamber of example 1 wherein the chamber comprises a coking chamber, a sole flue run, or a plurality of adjacent sole flue runs.
5. The coke oven chamber of example 4 wherein the chamber comprises a sole flue having a plurality of adjacent runs between the first sidewall and the second sidewall, and wherein the monolith crown extends over the plurality of the adjacent runs.
6. The coke oven chamber of example 5 wherein the monolith crown comprises a plurality of adjacent arches.
7. The coke oven chamber of example 1 wherein the monolith crown comprises a non-arch shape.
8. The coke oven chamber of example 1 wherein the monolith crown comprises a generally flat shape.
9. The coke oven chamber of example 1 wherein the monolith crown comprises a thermally-volume-stable material.
10. The coke oven chamber of example 1 wherein the monolith crown comprises at least one of a fused silica, zirconia, or refractory material.
11. The coke oven chamber of example 1 wherein the chamber comprises a horizontal heat recovery coke oven chamber.
12. The coke oven chamber of example 1 wherein the monolith crown has a crown width, and wherein the crown width is at least three feet.
13. The coke oven chamber of example 1 wherein the monolith crown meets at least one of the first sidewall or the second sidewall with an overlapping or interlocking joint.
14. A coke oven chamber, comprising:
15. The coke oven chamber of example 14 wherein the crown comprises at least one of bricks or a monolith.
16. The coke oven chamber of example 14 wherein the thermally-volume-stable material comprises fused silica or zirconia.
17. The coke oven chamber of example 14 wherein the crown comprises a surface parallel, arched, or angled relative to the floor.
18. The coke oven chamber of example 14 wherein the chamber comprises a coking chamber or a sole flue.
19. The coke oven chamber of example 14 wherein the crown comprises a first crown portion and a second crown portion, and wherein the first crown portion and second crown portion meet over the area between the plurality of sidewalls.
20. The coke oven chamber of example 14 wherein the crown comprises a monolith arch or a plurality of adjacent arches.
21. A method of turning down a horizontal heat recovery coke oven, the method comprising:
22. The method of example 21 wherein forming the coke oven structure comprises forming an oven at least partially of thermally volume-stable material.
23. The method of example 21 wherein forming the coke oven structure comprises forming a monolith spanning at least a portion of a distance between the first sidewall and the second sidewall.
24. The method of example 21 wherein forming the coke oven structure comprises forming a coke oven structure at least partially of silica brick, and wherein turning down the coke oven below a thermally-volume-stable temperature comprises turning down the coke oven below a temperature of 1,200° F.
25. The method of example 21 wherein turning down the coke oven comprises turning down oven operation to 50% of operational capacity or less.
26. The method of example 21 wherein turning down the coke oven comprises turning off the oven.
27. The method of example 21 wherein turning down the coke oven comprises cooling the crown without causing crown contraction.
From the foregoing it will be appreciated that, although specific embodiments of the technology have been described herein for purposes of illustration, various modifications may be made without deviating from the spirit and scope of the technology. For example, while several embodiments have been described in the context of HHR ovens, in further embodiments the monolith or thermally-volume-stable designs can be used in non-HHR ovens, such as byproduct ovens. Further, certain aspects of the new technology described in the context of particular embodiments may be combined or eliminated in other embodiments. For example, while certain embodiments have been discussed in the context of a crown for a coking chamber, the flat crown, monolith crown, thermally-volume-stable materials, and other features discussed above can be used in other portions of a coke oven system, such as a crown for a sole flue. Moreover, while advantages associated with certain embodiments of the technology have been described in the context of those embodiments, other embodiments may also exhibit such advantages, and not all embodiments need necessarily exhibit such advantages to fall within the scope of the technology. Accordingly, the disclosure and associated technology can encompass other embodiments not expressly shown or described herein. Thus, the disclosure is not limited except as by the appended claims.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
469868 | Thomas et al. | Mar 1892 | A |
1140798 | Carpenter | May 1915 | A |
1424777 | Schondeling | Aug 1922 | A |
1430027 | Plantinga | Sep 1922 | A |
1486401 | Van Ackeren | Mar 1924 | A |
1572391 | Klaiber | Feb 1926 | A |
1721813 | Rudolf et al. | Jul 1929 | A |
1818370 | Wine | Aug 1931 | A |
1848818 | Becker | Mar 1932 | A |
1955962 | Jones | Apr 1934 | A |
2394173 | Harris et al. | Feb 1946 | A |
2424012 | Bangham et al. | Jul 1947 | A |
2902991 | Whitman | Sep 1959 | A |
3033764 | Hannes | May 1962 | A |
3462345 | Kernan | Aug 1969 | A |
3545470 | Paton | Dec 1970 | A |
3616408 | Hickam | Oct 1971 | A |
3630852 | Nashan et al. | Dec 1971 | A |
3652403 | Knappstein et al. | Mar 1972 | A |
3676305 | Cremer | Jul 1972 | A |
3709794 | Kinzler et al. | Jan 1973 | A |
3746626 | Morrison, Jr. | Jul 1973 | A |
3748235 | Pries | Jul 1973 | A |
3784034 | Thompson | Jan 1974 | A |
3806032 | Pries | Apr 1974 | A |
3836161 | Buhl | Sep 1974 | A |
3839156 | Jakobi et al. | Oct 1974 | A |
3844900 | Schulte | Oct 1974 | A |
3857758 | Mole | Dec 1974 | A |
3875016 | Schmidt-Balve et al. | Apr 1975 | A |
3876506 | Dix et al. | Apr 1975 | A |
3878053 | Hyde | Apr 1975 | A |
3897312 | Armour et al. | Jul 1975 | A |
3906992 | Leach | Sep 1975 | A |
3912091 | Thompson | Oct 1975 | A |
3917458 | Polak | Nov 1975 | A |
3930961 | Sustarsic et al. | Jan 1976 | A |
3957591 | Riecker | May 1976 | A |
3959084 | Price | May 1976 | A |
3963582 | Helm et al. | Jun 1976 | A |
3969191 | Bollenbach | Jul 1976 | A |
3984289 | Sustarsic et al. | Oct 1976 | A |
4004702 | Szendroi | Jan 1977 | A |
4004983 | Pries | Jan 1977 | A |
4040910 | Knappstein et al. | Aug 1977 | A |
4059885 | Oldengott | Nov 1977 | A |
4067462 | Thompson | Jan 1978 | A |
4083753 | Rogers et al. | Apr 1978 | A |
4086231 | Ikio | Apr 1978 | A |
4100033 | Holter | Jul 1978 | A |
4111757 | Ciarimboli | Sep 1978 | A |
4124450 | MacDonald | Nov 1978 | A |
4141796 | Clark et al. | Feb 1979 | A |
4145195 | Knappstein et al. | Mar 1979 | A |
4147230 | Ormond et al. | Apr 1979 | A |
4189272 | Gregor et al. | Feb 1980 | A |
4194951 | Pries | Mar 1980 | A |
4196053 | Grohmann | Apr 1980 | A |
4211608 | Kwasnoski et al. | Jul 1980 | A |
4213489 | Cain | Jul 1980 | A |
4213828 | Calderon | Jul 1980 | A |
4222748 | Argo et al. | Sep 1980 | A |
4225393 | Gregor et al. | Sep 1980 | A |
4235830 | Bennett et al. | Nov 1980 | A |
4248671 | Belding | Feb 1981 | A |
4249997 | Schmitz | Feb 1981 | A |
4263099 | Porter | Apr 1981 | A |
4285772 | Kress | Aug 1981 | A |
4287024 | Thompson | Sep 1981 | A |
4289584 | Chuss et al. | Sep 1981 | A |
4289585 | Wagener et al. | Sep 1981 | A |
4303615 | Jarmell et al. | Dec 1981 | A |
4307673 | Caughey | Dec 1981 | A |
4314787 | Kwasnik et al. | Feb 1982 | A |
4330372 | Cairns et al. | May 1982 | A |
4334963 | Stog | Jun 1982 | A |
4336843 | Petty | Jun 1982 | A |
4340445 | Kucher et al. | Jul 1982 | A |
4342195 | Lo | Aug 1982 | A |
4344820 | Thompson | Aug 1982 | A |
4366029 | Bixby et al. | Dec 1982 | A |
4373244 | Mertens et al. | Feb 1983 | A |
4375388 | Hara et al. | Mar 1983 | A |
4391674 | Velmin et al. | Jul 1983 | A |
4392824 | Struck et al. | Jul 1983 | A |
4395269 | Schuler | Jul 1983 | A |
4396394 | Li et al. | Aug 1983 | A |
4396461 | Neubaum et al. | Aug 1983 | A |
4431484 | Weber et al. | Feb 1984 | A |
4439277 | Dix | Mar 1984 | A |
4445977 | Husher | May 1984 | A |
4446018 | Cerwick | May 1984 | A |
4448541 | Wirtschafter | May 1984 | A |
4452749 | Kolvek et al. | Jun 1984 | A |
4459103 | Gieskieng | Jul 1984 | A |
4469446 | Goodboy | Sep 1984 | A |
4498786 | Ruscheweyh | Feb 1985 | A |
4508539 | Nakai | Apr 1985 | A |
4527488 | Lindgren | Jul 1985 | A |
4568426 | Orlando et al. | Feb 1986 | A |
4570670 | Johnson | Feb 1986 | A |
4614567 | Stahlherm et al. | Sep 1986 | A |
4645513 | Kubota et al. | Feb 1987 | A |
4655193 | Blacket | Apr 1987 | A |
4655804 | Kercheval et al. | Apr 1987 | A |
4680167 | Orlando et al. | Jul 1987 | A |
4704195 | Janicka et al. | Nov 1987 | A |
4720262 | Durr et al. | Jan 1988 | A |
4726465 | Kwasnik et al. | Feb 1988 | A |
4929179 | Breidenbach et al. | May 1990 | A |
4941824 | Holter et al. | Jul 1990 | A |
5052922 | Stokman et al. | Oct 1991 | A |
5062925 | Durselen et al. | Nov 1991 | A |
5078822 | Hodges et al. | Jan 1992 | A |
5114542 | Childress et al. | May 1992 | A |
5227106 | Kolvek | Jul 1993 | A |
5228955 | Westbrook, III | Jul 1993 | A |
5318671 | Pruitt | Jun 1994 | A |
5670025 | Baird | Sep 1997 | A |
5928476 | Daniels | Jul 1999 | A |
5968320 | Sprague | Oct 1999 | A |
6017214 | Sturgulewski | Jan 2000 | A |
6059932 | Sturgulewski | May 2000 | A |
6139692 | Tamura et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6152668 | Knoch | Nov 2000 | A |
6187148 | Sturgulewski | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6189819 | Racine | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6290494 | Barkdoll | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6596128 | Westbrook | Jul 2003 | B2 |
6626984 | Taylor | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6699035 | Brooker | Mar 2004 | B2 |
6758875 | Reid et al. | Jul 2004 | B2 |
6907895 | Johnson et al. | Jun 2005 | B2 |
6946011 | Snyder | Sep 2005 | B2 |
7056390 | Fratello et al. | Jun 2006 | B2 |
7077892 | Lee | Jul 2006 | B2 |
7314060 | Chen et al. | Jan 2008 | B2 |
7331298 | Taylor et al. | Feb 2008 | B2 |
7497930 | Barkdoll et al. | Mar 2009 | B2 |
7611609 | Valia et al. | Nov 2009 | B1 |
7644711 | Creel | Jan 2010 | B2 |
7727307 | Winkler | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7803627 | Hodges | Sep 2010 | B2 |
7827689 | Crane et al. | Nov 2010 | B2 |
7998316 | Barkdoll et al. | Aug 2011 | B2 |
8071060 | Ukai et al. | Dec 2011 | B2 |
8079751 | Kapila et al. | Dec 2011 | B2 |
8152970 | Barkdoll et al. | Apr 2012 | B2 |
8236142 | Westbrook et al. | Aug 2012 | B2 |
8266853 | Bloom et al. | Sep 2012 | B2 |
8398935 | Howell, Jr. et al. | Mar 2013 | B2 |
20020134659 | Westbrook | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20060102420 | Huber et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
20080169578 | Crane et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080179165 | Chen et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080271985 | Yamasaki | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20090217576 | Kim et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090283395 | Hippe | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20100095521 | Bertini et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100115912 | Worley et al. | May 2010 | A1 |
20100287871 | Bloom et al. | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20110048917 | Kim et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110223088 | Chang et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110253521 | Kim | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20120024688 | Barkdoll | Feb 2012 | A1 |
20120030998 | Barkdoll et al. | Feb 2012 | A1 |
20120152720 | Reichelt et al. | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120228115 | Westbrook | Sep 2012 | A1 |
20130216717 | Rago et al. | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20130306462 | Kim et al. | Nov 2013 | A1 |
20140033917 | Rodgers et al. | Feb 2014 | A1 |
20140048402 | Quanci et al. | Feb 2014 | A1 |
20140048404 | Quanci et al. | Feb 2014 | A1 |
20140048405 | Quanci et al. | Feb 2014 | A1 |
20140061018 | Sarpen et al. | Mar 2014 | A1 |
20140083836 | Quanci et al. | Mar 2014 | A1 |
20140182195 | Quanci et al. | Jul 2014 | A1 |
20140182683 | Quanci et al. | Jul 2014 | A1 |
20140183023 | Quanci et al. | Jul 2014 | A1 |
20140183024 | Chun et al. | Jul 2014 | A1 |
20140183026 | Quanci et al. | Jul 2014 | A1 |
20140262139 | Choi et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20150122629 | Freimuth et al. | May 2015 | A1 |
20150247092 | Quanci et al. | Sep 2015 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2775992 | May 2011 | CA |
2822857 | Jul 2012 | CA |
2064363 | Oct 1990 | CN |
2064363 | Oct 1990 | CN |
1092457 | Sep 1994 | CN |
1255528 | Jun 2000 | CN |
1358822 | Jul 2002 | CN |
2509188 | Sep 2002 | CN |
2528771 | Jan 2003 | CN |
1468364 | Jan 2004 | CN |
2668641 | Jan 2005 | CN |
202226816 | May 2012 | CN |
212176 | Jul 1909 | DE |
3315738 | Nov 1983 | DE |
3329367 | Nov 1984 | DE |
19545736 | Jun 1997 | DE |
19803455 | Aug 1999 | DE |
10154785 | May 2003 | DE |
102009031436 | Jan 2011 | DE |
102011052785 | Dec 2012 | DE |
2339664 | Aug 1977 | FR |
441784 | Jan 1936 | GB |
606340 | Aug 1948 | GB |
611524 | Nov 1948 | GB |
725865 | Mar 1955 | GB |
871094 | Jun 1961 | GB |
S50148405 | Nov 1975 | JP |
54054101 | Apr 1979 | JP |
57051786 | Mar 1982 | JP |
57051787 | Mar 1982 | JP |
57083585 | May 1982 | JP |
57090092 | Jun 1982 | JP |
58091788 | May 1983 | JP |
59051978 | Mar 1984 | JP |
59053589 | Mar 1984 | JP |
59071388 | Apr 1984 | JP |
59108083 | Jun 1984 | JP |
59145281 | Aug 1984 | JP |
60004588 | Jan 1985 | JP |
61106690 | May 1986 | JP |
62011794 | Jan 1987 | JP |
62285980 | Dec 1987 | JP |
01103694 | Apr 1989 | JP |
01249886 | Oct 1989 | JP |
H0319127 | Jan 1991 | JP |
07188668 | Jul 1995 | JP |
07216357 | Aug 1995 | JP |
08127778 | May 1996 | JP |
2001200258 | Jul 2001 | JP |
03197588 | Aug 2001 | JP |
2002106941 | Apr 2002 | JP |
200341258 | Feb 2003 | JP |
2003071313 | Mar 2003 | JP |
04159392 | Oct 2008 | JP |
2009144121 | Jul 2009 | JP |
2012102302 | May 2012 | JP |
960008754 | Oct 1996 | KR |
1019990054426 | Dec 1999 | KR |
10-0797852 | Jan 2008 | KR |
10-2011-0010452 | Feb 2011 | KR |
10-0296700 | Oct 2011 | KR |
101318388 | Oct 2013 | KR |
WO-9012074 | Oct 1990 | WO |
WO-9945083 | Sep 1999 | WO |
WO-2007103649 | Sep 2007 | WO |
WO-2008034424 | Mar 2008 | WO |
WO-2010107513 | Sep 2010 | WO |
WO-2011000447 | Jan 2011 | WO |
WO-2012029979 | Mar 2012 | WO |
WO-2013023872 | Feb 2013 | WO |
Entry |
---|
JP 03-197588, Inoqu Keizo et al., Method and Equipment for Boring Degassing Hole in Coal Charge in Coke Oven, Japanese Patent (Abstract Only) Aug. 28, 1991. |
JP 04-159392, Inoue Keizo et al., Method and Equipment for Opening Hole for Degassing of Coal Charge in Coke Oven, Japanese Patent (Abstract Only) Jun. 2, 1992. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion issued for PCT/US2014/028837 and mailed on Aug. 21, 2014, 11 pages. |
Crelling, et al., “Effects of Weathered Coal on Coking Properties and Coke Quality”, Fuel, 1979, vol. 58, Issue 7, pp. 542-546. |
Database WPI, Week 199115, Thomson Scientific, Lond, GB; AN 1991-107552. |
Diez, et al., “Coal for Metallurgical Coke Production: Predictions of Coke Quality and Future Requirements for Cokemaking”, International Journal of Coal Geology, 2002, vol. 50, Issue 1-4, pp. 389-412. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion of International Application No. PCT/US2014/028837; Date of Mailing: Aug. 21, 2014; 11 pages. |
ASTM D5341-99(2010)e1, Standard Test Method for Measuring Coke Reactivity Index (CRI) and Coke Strength After Reaction (CSR), ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, 2010. |
Clean coke process: process development studies by USS Engineers and Consultants, Inc., Wisconsin Tech Search, request date Oct. 5, 2011, 17 pages. |
Rose, Harold J., “The Selection of Coals for the Manufacture of Coke,” American Institute of Mining and Metallurgical Engineers, Feb. 1926, 8 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/839,384, filed Aug. 28, 2015, Quanci et al. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/839,493, filed Aug. 28, 2015, Quanci et al. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/839,551, filed Aug. 28, 2015, Quanci et al. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/839,588, filed Aug. 28, 2015, Quanci et al. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/865,581, filed Sep. 25, 2015, Sarpen et al. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20140262726 A1 | Sep 2014 | US |