Hose connecting structure

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 6408890
  • Patent Number
    6,408,890
  • Date Filed
    Wednesday, October 18, 2000
    23 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, June 25, 2002
    22 years ago
Abstract
A hard pipe has an annular stop projection formed about its portion press fitted in a flexible hose to make a hose connecting structure. The projection has a cross sectional contour including a gentle outward slope extending from the front end of the projection to a first corner, which makes the angle of the subsequent second corner gentle, and a rear face at the second corner extending inwardly toward the longitudinal axis of the pipe at right angles thereto. The hose connecting structure has high levels of pull-out strength and sealing properties without having the hose damaged by the projection on the pipe.
Description




BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION




1. Field of the Invention:




This invention relates to a hose connecting structure obtained by press fitting a hard pipe into a flexible hose, such as of rubber, while expanding the latter radially to a certain extent. This type of structure is often employed for connecting, for example, hoses and a branched hard pipe in an automobile engine compartment.




2. Description of the Related Art:




In an assembly in which a hard pipe is simply press fitted into a flexible hose, the hose is likely to slip off easily. Therefore, various proposals have been made to join a hose to a pipe in such a way that the hose may not easily slip off the pipe. For example, an adhesive is employed for bonding the inner surface of a hose to the outer surface of a pipe. According to another proposal, an O-ring is interposed between a flexible hose and a hard pipe. Still another proposal is shown in

FIG. 1

, which relies upon a clip


3


fitted about a hose


2


for holding it against a pipe


1


press fitted in the hose


2


. These methods are, however, generally not satisfactory in working efficiency, and they do not always make a hose connecting structure which is satisfactory in pull-out strength and sealing properties. Moreover, a lug


4


projecting from the clip


3


is an obstacle in, for example, engine compartments of recent automobiles having a high density of installed items.




An assembly proposed more recently to overcome those problems is obtained by press fitting a hard pipe having stoppers projecting from its outer periphery into a flexible hose. For example, Japanese Patent Application Laid-Open No. 331894/1992 discloses a hard pipe


6


having stoppers


5


formed on its outer periphery by exchange mold injection from a soft material, and pressed fitted in a flexible hose


7


, as shown in FIG.


2


. Japanese Patent Application Laid-Open No. 159077/1997 discloses a branched pipe


8


of a hard material having three branches


9


each having formed on its outer periphery stop ridges


10


each having a cross section terminating in a sharp edge, each branch


9


being press fitted in a flexible hose


12


having a reinforcing fiber layer


11


in its wall, as shown in FIG.


3


.




The methods as disclosed in those two Japanese patent applications are better in working efficiency than the previously known ones as described before, since the connecting work is completed merely by press fitting a pipe into a hose. They are, however, still not always satisfactory in pull-out strength and sealing properties. In Japanese Patent Application Laid-Open No. 331894/1992, the stoppers


5


as shown in

FIG. 2

are formed separately from the pipe


6


, and even if the advantages of their exchange mold injection may be taken into account, a strong pull-out force acting upon the assembly is likely to cause the stoppers


5


to come off the pipe


6


or become displaced and thus it is feared that the assembly will not maintain satisfactory pull-out strength and sealing properties. In Japanese Patent Application Laid-Open No. 159077/1997, the ridges


10


as shown in

FIG. 3

form integral parts of the pipe, but their hard and sharp edges are held against the inner surfaces of the hoses


12


so tightly that if there is a strong impact upon the assembly, the hoses


12


may be damaged by the edges of the ridges


10


and lose sealing properties. As each hose is expanded to a greater diameter when fitted about the pipe, the edges of the ridges


10


are held against the wall of the hose


12


more tightly, and are more likely to damage the hose.




SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION




It is, therefore, an object of this invention to overcome all of the various drawbacks as pointed out above with respect to a hose connecting structure obtained by press fitting a hard pipe into a flexible hose while expanding the latter radially.




According to a first aspect of this invention, there is provided a hose connecting structure comprising a flexible hose having a reinforcing fiber layer in its wall, and a hard pipe a portion of which is press fitted in the hose, wherein the pipe has an annular stop projection formed about its press fitted portion, and having a cross sectional contour including a gentle outward slope from the front end of the projection toward the rear end side to a first corner, which makes the angle of the subsequent second corner gentle, and a rear face at this second corner extending inward toward the longitudinal axis of the pipe at right angles thereto, forming an annular depression.




The structure can be made with high working efficiency using a method in which the hard pipe is press fitted into the flexible hose while the hose is radially expanded. Even if a strong pull-out force may act upon the assembly, the stop projection forming an integral part of the pipe does not come off, or become displaced, but the assembly maintains its pull-out strength and sealing properties.




The structure further has the following advantages:




(1) The stop projection


14


having a gentle slope from the front end toward the rear end side in its cross sectional contour, as shown in

FIG. 4A

, facilitates the press fitting of the pipe


13


into the hose


15


.




(2) The stop projection


14


having in its cross sectional contour a rear face


16


extending from the second corner


17




b


toward the central longitudinal axis of the pipe


13


at right angles thereto ensures the high pull-out strength and sealing properties of the structure, since the rear face


16


engaging the inner surface of the hose


15


resists strongly any pull-out force acting upon it, as is obvious from FIG.


4


B. In this connection, the second corner


17




b


is not necessarily required to have a sharp angle which is by far smaller than 90°, but the projection


14


is effective if the second corner


17




b


has an angle of, say, 70° to 110°.




(3) The second corner


17




b


of the stop projection


14


has its angle enlarged by the presence of its first corner


17




a


. It is, therefore, possible to avoid any damaging of the hose by a sharp projection and any resulting lowering of sealing properties as pointed out before in connection with the assembly disclosed in Japanese Patent Application Laid-Open No. 159077/1997.




The hose


15


has a reinforcing fiber layer


18


in its wall. The reinforcing fiber layer


18


does not, however, present any resistance to the press fitting of the pipe


13


, since the hose


15


is radially expanded when the pipe


13


is press fitted therein, as is obvious from (1) above. If a pull-out force acts upon the structure, the hose


15


is caused to contract radially, and the reinforcing fiber layer


18


holds the inner surface of the hose


15


strongly against the stop projection


14


to enhance the pull-out strength of the assembly, as is obvious from (2) above. It is, however, possible to avoid any damaging of the hose


15


, as is obvious from (3) above.




According to a second aspect of this invention, the hose is radially expanded by at least 20% when the pipe is press fitted thereinto. The radial expansion of the hose to such an extent ensures the still higher pull-out strength and sealing properties of the assembly, while it is still possible to avoid any damaging of the hose by the stop projection on the pipe and any resulting lowering of sealing properties, as explained above.




According to a third aspect of this invention, at least an innermost wall layer of the hose is formed from an elastomer having a tear strength of at least 20 N/mm, such as EPDM (an ethylene-propylene-diene terpolymer) or EPM (an ethylene-propylene copolymer). If the hose is radially expanded by a very high percentage (say, 30 to 50%), there is some possibility or other of the hose being damaged by the stop projection on the pipe, even if its second corner may have an enlarged angle as stated before. The elastomer is effective for protecting the hose under such circumstances.




According to a fourth aspect of this invention, the reinforcing fiber layer has a pull-out strength of at least 0.3 N/mm. The radial expansion of the hose by a very high percentage may cause the separation of the reinforcing fiber layer from the wall of the hose or its displacement and thereby lower the sealing properties of the assembly. However, no such separation or displacement is likely to occur to any hose with a reinforcing layer having a pull-out strength of at least 0.3 N/mm.




The above and other features and advantages of this invention will become more apparent from the following description and the accompanying drawings.











BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS





FIGS. 1

to


3


are all sectional or partly sectional views of a known hose connecting structure;





FIGS. 4A and 4B

are a set of partly sectional views illustrating the operation of a hose connecting structure according to this invention;





FIG. 5

is a partly sectional view of a hose connecting structure embodying this invention;





FIGS. 6A

to


6


C are all schematic views showing different forms of stop projections on a pipe in the structure according to this invention; and





FIGS. 7A and 7B

are each a set of partly sectional views showing the operation of a combination of a hose and a pipe in the structure according to this invention.











DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION




Hose Connecting Structure:




The hose connecting structure of this invention can be employed for connecting a hose to a pipe in any field of art. A typical example of its application is, however, the joining of a hose to a radiator, or heater in an automobile engine compartment. The pipe may be of the branched or non-branched type. Hard Pipe:




The hard pipe may be a branched or non-branched one having an annular stop projection formed about the portion press fitted in the hose. The pipe may, for example, be of hard nylon, such as nylon


6


or


66


, reinforced or not reinforced with glass fiber, though it may be of any other appropriate material.





FIG. 5

shows by way of example a branched hard pipe


19


having three branches


20


formed each for fitting in a hose. Each branch


20


has an annular stop projection


21


formed thereabout as an integral part thereof. Each projection


21


has a height depending on factors including the percentage by which the hose is radially expanded when the branch


20


is press fitted thereinto.




Each projection


21


has a cross sectional contour including a gentle slope extending from the front end of the projection


21


toward the rear end side to a first corner


22




a


, and a second corner


22




b


at the rear end of the projection


21


. Due to the first corner


22




a


, the angle at the second corner


22




b


is enlarged. The rear face at the second corner


22




b


extends inward at right angles to the longitudinal axis of the pipe, creating an annular depression. The cross sectional contour of the projection


21


as described is more clearly shown in FIG.


6


A. The first corner


22




a


has such an angle that the top face of the projection


21


may be parallel to a line x parallel to the longitudinal axis of the pipe


19


, and that the second corner


22




b


may have an angle of 90°.




According to this invention, however, the first corner


22




a


may be of any angle as far as the second corner


22




b


has a substantially enlarged angle thereby. Therefore,

FIG. 6B

shows a projection


21


including a first corner


22




a


having a smaller angle, and a top face inclined inwardly from the line x to form a second corner


22




b


having an angle exceeding 90° (but not exceeding, say, 110°).

FIG. 6C

shows another contour of projection


21


including a first corner


22




a


having a larger angle, and a top face inclined outwardly from the line x to form a second corner


22




b


having an angle smaller than 90° (but not smaller than, say, 70°).




The projection


21


shown in any of

FIGS. 6A

to


6


C is not specifically limited in the distance between its first and second corners


22




a


and


22




b


as measured along the line x, or the distance shown at y in FIG.


6


A. The effect may, however, be insufficient if the distance y between two corners


22




a


and


22




b


is so small as, say, less than 0.5 mm. If the distance y is so large as, say, over 5 mm, the pipe may be difficult to press fit, as it has to overcome a greater resistance.




The hard pipe may be coated with a thin layer of a soft elastomer covering at least its press fitted portion, or its stop projection. This layer is preferably formed by exchange mold injection when the pipe is molded, though it can be formed by any other appropriate method. Hose:




The flexible hose may be of any known material, but preferably contains a reinforcing fiber layer in its wall between the inner and outer surfaces thereof. The reinforcing fiber layer may, for example, be of spirally wound, or braided reinforcing yarn. It may or may not be bonded by an adhesive to the material of the hose.




The reinforcing fiber layer is not specifically limited in its pull-out strength. It, however, preferably has a pull-out strength of at least 0.3 N/mm if the hose is radially expanded by as much as, say, 30 to 50%. Such a strength can be obtained if the layer is of yarn covered with fuzz which may be expected to produce a physical adhesive effect, such as staple yarn or partly stretch broken filament thereof (spunized yarn). It is also effective to use reinforcing yarn dipped in a solution for surface treatment, such as RFL, or to bond yarn to the hose material chemically with an adhesive without dipping it in any such solution. Percentage of Hose Expansion:




The percentage by which the hose is radially expanded to form the hose connecting structure according to this invention can be expressed as [(A/B)−1]×100(%), where A is the maximum outside diameter of the hard pipe (i.e. the outside diameter of its stop projection at its top) and B is the inside diameter of the flexible hose.




It is usual practice to employ a percentage of only, say, 5 to 10% so that the hose may not be damaged by the stop projection on the pipe. According to this invention, however, it is possible to employ a percentage of, say, 20% or even higher and make a structure of high pull-out strength and sealing properties, while avoiding any damaging of the hose by the stop projection on the pipe.




The expansion of the hose by a percentage of as high as, say, 30 to 50% makes it possible to obtain a structure of still higher pull-out strength and sealing properties. Such an expansion is, however, likely to cause the separation of the reinforcing fiber layer from the wall of the hose, or the displacement of its yarn. Therefore, it is preferable for the reinforcing fiber layer to have a pull-out strength of at least 0.3 N/mm, as already stated. Moreover, the hose preferably has an innermost wall layer formed from a material having a tear strength of at least 20 N/mm. Inside Diameter of Hose and Outside Diameter of Pipe at the Edge of its




Press Fitted Portion:




The relationship between the inside diameter of the hose and the maximum outside diameter of the pipe depends on the percentage of the hose expansion, as described above. Meanwhile, the inside diameter of the hose and the outside diameter of the pipe at the edge of its press fitted portion are not specifically limited relative to each other.




However, if the inside diameter of a hose


23




a


is larger than the outside diameter of a pipe


24




a


at the edge of its press fitted portion as shown in

FIG. 7A

, a clearance


26


having a V-shaped cross section may be formed between the inner surface of the hose


23




a


and the tapered surface


25




a


of the pipe


24




a


over which it is press fitted into the hose. The presence of the clearance


26


will be undesirable for the sealing properties of the structure.

FIG. 7B

shows a combination of a hose and a pipe which is desirable for the sealing properties. The hose


23




b


has an inside diameter which is smaller than the outside diameter of the pipe


24




b


at the edge of its press fitted portion. When the pipe


24




b


is press fitted into the hose


23




b


, the inner surface of the hose


23




b


is thereby caused to have a bulged portion


27


and contact with the entire tapered surface


25




b


of the pipe so intimately that no clearance may be formed therebetween.




EXAMPLES




Hose connecting structures according to this invention and conventional ones were prepared using a high, in some cases very high, percentage of expansion of the hoses, and are shown at Nos. 1 to 7 in Tables 1 and 2. In the Tables, examples having a stop projection of

FIG. 5

are those of the present invention and examples having a stop projection of

FIG. 3

or

FIG. 1

are comparative ones.














TABLE 1













Example



















1




2




3




4




5




6




7
























Test




Flexible




Inside diameter/Wall thickness




16/4




16/4




16/4




16/4




16/4




16/4




16/4






sample




hose




(mm)








Tear strength (N/mm) of EPDM




35




35




35




35




20




35




35








forming the innermost layer








Pull-out strength (N/mm) of




0.5




0.5




0.5




0.5




0.5




0.5




0.5








thread







Pipe




Stop projection





FIG. 5






FIG. 5






FIG. 5






FIG. 5






FIG. 5






FIG. 5






FIG. 3
















(conventional)








Material




PA66-




PA66-




PA66-




PA66-




PA66-




PA66-




Exchange mold injection









GF30




GF30




GF30




GF30




GF30




GF30




product of hard PA66-















GF30 and soft TPO*1








Max. outside diameter (mm) of




19.2




20.8




22.4




24




22.4




22.4




23.4








its press fitted portion








Outside diameter (mm) of its




16




16




16




16




16




17.5




16








press fitted portion at its edge







Hose




Hose expansion (%)




20




30




40




50




40




40




46.3







connecting







structure






Evaluation




Initial




Reinforcing yarn at hose end




No




No




No




No




No




No




No changes






of




properties





changes




changes




changes




changes




changes




changes






structure





Pull-out load (N)




450




660




680




640




650




720




570








Sealing pressure (MPa)




1.00




1.11




1.25




1.16




1.16




1.22




1.15







After




Condition of inner surface of




No




No




No




No




No




No




No changes







impact by a




hose at pipe projections




changes




changes




changes




changes




changes




changes







falling




Pull-out load (N)




460




670




700




650




640




730




580







weight




Sealing pressure (MPa)




1.02




1.13




1.19




1.16




1.13




1.26




1.11











*1Santoprene 191-70PA, olefinic thermoplastic elastomer of A.E.S. (Japan) Co., Ltd.























TABLE 2













Example



















1




2




3




4




5




6




7
























Test




Flexible




Inside diameter/Wall thickness




16/4




16/4




16/4




16/4




16/4




16/4




16/4






sample




hose




(mm)








Tear strength (N/mm) of EPDM




35




15




35




35




35




20




35








forming the innermost layer








Pull-out strength (N/mm) of




0.5




0.5




0.5




0.5




0.5




0.5




0.5








thread







Pipe




Stop projection





FIG. 5






FIG. 5






FIG. 5






FIG. 5






FIG. 5






FIG. 3






FIG. 1















(conventional)




(conventional)








Material




PA66-




PA66-




PA66-




PA66-




PA66-




PA66-GF30




Conventional









GF30




GF30




GF30




GF30




GF30





specifications








Max. outside diameter (mm) of




18.4




22.4




22.4




22.4




24.8




22.4




Clip used for








its press fitted portion










holding hose








Outside diameter (mm) of its




16




16




16




15




16




16








press fitted portion at its edge







Hose




Hose expansion (%)




15




40




40




40




55




40







connecting







structure






Evaluation




Initial




Reinforcing yarn at hose end




In order




In order




Displaced




In order




Displaced




In order




In order






of




properties




Pull-out load (N)




220




620




270




260




260




610




490






structure





Sealing pressure (MPa)




0.56




1.13




0.64




0.61




0.58




1.13




1.01







After




Condition of inner surface of




Cracked




Cracked





No





Cracked




No changes







impact by a




hose at pipe projections







changes







falling




Pull-out load (N)




90




120





250





180




460







weight




Sealing pressure (MPa)




0.34




0.39





0.59





0.43




0.98














The details under the following items are shown in Tables 1 and 2: flexible hose inside diameter/wall thickness (mm); tear strength (N/mm) of EPDM material used for inner surface layer of flexible hose; pull-out strength (N/mm) of thread in reinforcing fiber layer; construction of pipe stopper projections; material of the pipe; maximum outside diameter (mm) of press fit portion; outside diameter (mm) of press fit portion at its edge; and hose expansion percentage calculated from inner diameter of flexible hose and maximum outside diameter of pipe press fit portion.




Referring to materials of pipes in Tables 1 and 2, PA66-GF30 means a material obtained by mixing nylon


66


and glass fiber in a weight ratio of 70:30. In Example 7 of Tables 1, a coating layer of TPQ were formed on the pipe of PA66-GF30 by exchange mold injection. TPO is Santoprene 191-70PA, an olefinic thermoplastic elastomer of A.E.S. (Japan) Co., Ltd. Example 7 of Table 2 represents a known structure with a clip as shown in FIG.


1


and irrelevant specifications are omitted. Evaluation of Structures:




The structures according to the present invention and conventional ones were each evaluated for their properties as shown in Tables 1 and 2. Each structure was first evaluated for its initial properties as joined. Its initial evaluation included the visual inspection of the reinforcing yarn at the end of the hose through which the pipe had been press fitted. It was also evaluated for its sealing pressure (MPa). Then, the hose was pulled off the pipe for the evaluation of its pull-out load (N).




Each structure was also evaluated for its properties after application of an impact by a falling weight. The structure was mounted horizontally so as to have its longitudinal axis lying in parallel to the floor, and an iron ball having a weight of 500 g was allowed to fall on the structure from a height of 1 m. Its evaluation included the visual inspection of the inner surface portion of the hose contacting the stop projection on the pipe. It was likewise evaluated for its pull-out load (N) and its sealing pressure (MPa). No evaluation by application of an impact was made of the structure of Examples 3 and 5, since their initial evaluation had already revealed the displacement of yarn.




While the invention has been described by way of its preferred embodiments, it is to be understood that variations or modifications may be easily made by those skilled in the art without departing from the scope of this invention which is defined by the appended claims.



Claims
  • 1. A structure comprising a flexible hose and a hard pipe,the hose having a wall with a reinforcing fiber layer and an inside diameter which is expanded by from 30 to 50% at one end, and the hard pipe having a portion press fitted in said one end of the hose, an annular stop projection formed about its press fitted portion, and a cross sectional contour including a gentle outward slope extending from the front end of said projection toward the rear end side to a first corner, which makes the angle of the subsequent second corner gentle, and a rear face of said second corner extending inwardly toward the longitudinal axis of said pipe at right angles thereto; and said reinforcing fiber layer is of reinforcing yarn having a pull-out thread strength of at least 0.3 N/mm.
  • 2. A structure as set forth in claim 1 wherein the reinforcing yarn has been dipped in a surface treatment solution to impart the pull-out thread strength.
  • 3. The structure as set forth in claim 2, wherein said pipe is branched or is not branched.
  • 4. The structure as set forth in claim 2, wherein said pipe is coated with a thin layer of a soft elastomer covering at least said press fitted portion, or said projection.
  • 5. The structure as set forth in claim 2, wherein said hose has an initial inside diameter which is smaller than the outside diameter of said pipe at the forward edge of said press fitted portion thereof.
  • 6. The structure as set forth in claim 2, which is in combination with a radiator or a heater in an automobile engine compartment, a pipe of which is the hard pipe.
  • 7. The structure as set forth in claim 2, wherein said pipe is of hard nylon.
  • 8. The structure as set forth in claim 7, wherein said hard nylon is reinforced with glass fiber.
  • 9. The structure as set forth in claim 2, wherein at least an innermost wall layer of said hose is formed from an elastomer having a tear strength of at least 20 N/mm.
  • 10. The structure as set forth in claim 9, wherein said elastomer is EPDM (an ethylene-propylene-diene terpolymer), or EPM (an ethylene-propylene copolymer).
  • 11. A hose connecting structure as set forth in claim 1, wherein said reinforcing fiber layer is of staple yarn or spunized yarn having a pull-out thread strength of at least 0.3 N/mm.
  • 12. The structure as set forth in claim 11, wherein said pipe is branched or is not branched.
  • 13. The structure as set forth in claim 11, wherein said pipe is coated with a thin layer of a soft elastomer covering at least said press fitted portion, or said projection.
  • 14. The structure as set forth in claim 11, wherein said hose has an initial inside diameter which is smaller than the outside diameter of said pipe at the forward edge of said press fitted portion thereof.
  • 15. The structure as set forth in claim 11, which is in combination with a radiator or a heater in an automobile engine compartment, a pipe of which is the hard pipe.
  • 16. The structure as set forth in claim 11, wherein said pipe is of hard nylon.
  • 17. The structure as set forth in claim 16, wherein said hard nylon is reinforced with glass fiber.
  • 18. The structure as set forth in claim 11, wherein at least an innermost wall layer of said hose is formed from an elastomer having a tear strength of at least 20 N/mm.
  • 19. The structure as set forth in claim 18, wherein said elastomer is EPDM (an ethylene-propylene-diene terpolymer), or EPM (an ethylene-propylene copolymer).
Priority Claims (1)
Number Date Country Kind
11-304005 Oct 1999 JP
US Referenced Citations (13)
Number Name Date Kind
2805088 Cline et al. Sep 1957 A
3210100 Lowles et al. Oct 1965 A
3252720 Waite May 1966 A
3653692 Henson Apr 1972 A
3711130 Betzler Jan 1973 A
3759445 King Sep 1973 A
3966238 Washkewicz et al. Jun 1976 A
4905736 Kitami et al. Mar 1990 A
5143122 Adkins Sep 1992 A
5348779 Igarashi Sep 1994 A
5358012 Kish Oct 1994 A
5413147 Moreiras et al. May 1995 A
5685345 Gieseke et al. Nov 1997 A
Foreign Referenced Citations (4)
Number Date Country
69 42 443 Mar 1970 DE
196 53 257 Jun 1998 DE
4-331894 Nov 1992 JP
9-159077 Jun 1997 JP
Non-Patent Literature Citations (2)
Entry
Patent Abstracts of Japan; vol. 1997, No. 02, Feb. 28, 1997; 08 270857; Oct. 15, 1996.
Patent Abstracts of Japan; vol. 1998, No. 14, Dec. 31, 1998; 10 231977; Sep. 2, 1998.