Patent Grant
10189225
The invention relates to hoses for conveying fluids under pressure that are also known as high pressure hoses or hydraulic hoses and to a method to produce such kind of hose.
High pressure, flexible hoses for conveying fluids under high pressure such as hydraulic oil, water, but also steam or gasses are omnipresent in all kinds of equipment and vehicles to effectively transfer motion or fluids between parts that can move relative to one another.
Typically these kind of hoses consist of an elastomer core tube that contains the fluid around which one or more reinforcement layers have been spirally wound while being radially separated by intermediate layers of elastomer material. An outer layer is generally applied on the outermost reinforcement layer for covering the reinforcement such that it does not get damaged.
The reinforcement layer is crucial to the functioning of the hose in that it does not only impart strength to the hose but also keeps the hose flexible. The reinforcement layer must be able to withstand highly variable pressures with shock waves propagating through the fluid. As hoses are many times used in harsh environments and convey aggressive fluids at high or low temperatures the reinforcement layer must maintain its properties of strength, flexibility and fatigue resistance also in these circumstances.
While in the past expectations from novel synthetic reinforcement fibers such as long chain synthetic polyamide based aramids, or ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene oriented fibres were high, the most used material for reinforcing high pressure hose is still the plain steel wire, possibly coated with an adhesive layer.
The steel wires can be applied around the core tube in a number of ways such as in:
The steel wires in the hose are wound under a helix angle that is conventionally set as the angle between the tangent vector to the steel wire and the axis of the helix. When the angle is close to the so called ‘neutral angle’ the reinforcement will behave neutral when pressure is applied to the hose: the hose will neither shorten nor elongate. The neutral angle is A tan(√{square root over (2)}) which is about 54°44′.
From the mechanical point of view the hose must fulfil some basic requirements:
The following prior art in the field of steel wire reinforced high pressure hoses is of particular relevance to the invention:
The prior art hoses therefore suffer from the mentioned drawbacks that the inventors solved with the below described innovative high pressure hose.
The primary object of the invention is to provide a hose that does away with the drawbacks of the prior art. It is a further object of the invention to provide a reinforcement a hose that has an optimal load sharing between all reinforcement layers so that at burst all reinforcement is loaded equally and to its maximum. A further objective is to have an optimal load sharing in the hose reinforcement not only at burst pressure but also on any intermediate pressure up to burst pressure in order to improve the impulse life of the hose. Further, an increased flexibility of the hose is aimed at. Another object is to provide a hose with a minimum of different reinforcement materials to reduce material stock. Further, it is the objective of the inventors to provide a method to produce the advantageous hose. As a last objective of the invention the materials fed to the hose building machine are equal and the changes are brought on the wire in the hose building machine itself or on the rewinder that spools the wire bundles on bobbins for the hose building machine.
According a first aspect of the invention a hose for conveying fluids under pressure as defined by the features of claim 1 is claimed. The hose is built up around an elastomer core tube as known in the art. The tube can be extruded on a mandrel or the tube can be self-supporting. It is made of an elastomer material that is compatible with the fluid to be conveyed.
The hose comprises at least two reinforcement layers at discrete reinforcement radii. At least two of those reinforcement layers comprise steel wires helically wound around the axis of the hose. In what follows a reinforcement layer refers to either a single layer of spiralled wires in case of a spiralled layer or the doubled layer of braided wires in case of a braided layer. In both cases the reinforcement layer is present at a discrete radius from the axis of the hose.
The at least two reinforcement layers are radially separated by intermediate elastomer material layers. In case of two reinforcement layers only one intermediate layer is present. The intermediate elastomer material layers are important in that they transfer stresses through the pipe wall from one reinforcement layer to the next. Intermediate elastomer material should also adhere well to the reinforcement layers in order to preserve integrity of the hose. The thickness of the intermediate layer can be practically null for example for thermoplastic hoses as layers can be glued to one another. For thermosetting elastomers the thickness is of the order of magnitude of the steel wire reinforcement layer thickness i.e. between a quarter to four times the diameter of the steel wire.
The hose is finished by a protective layer covering the outermost reinforcement layers. The protective layer can be made of an elastomer material or another harder material. Possibly it comprises textile materials for increasing the wear resistance of the hose.
Whenever reference to an ‘elastomer’ is made in this application an elastic polymer material is meant that can either be thermosetting (requiring vulcanisation or heat treatment) or thermoplastic.
Thermosetting elastomers are typically rubber materials such as natural or synthetic rubbers. Synthetic rubbers like NBR (Acrylonitrile Butadiene), SBR (Styrene Butadiene), EPDM (Ethylene Propylene Diene Monomer) or CR (Polychloroprene) or silicone rubbers are favoured for use in hoses. Of course different additives can be added to the polymer to adapt its properties.
Thermoplastic elastomeric materials can be e.g. thermoplastic polyurethanes, thermoplastic polyamides, polyolefin blends, thermoplastic co-polyesters, thermoplastic fluoropolymers such as polyvinylidene difluoride, or even polyoxymethylene (POM). Although their use is not so widespread as rubber hose material, they find specific uses in niche applications.
The invention is characterised by the inventive adaptations of the steel wires used in the at least two steel wire reinforcement layers. Practical steel compositions of the steel wire used for the reinforcement of high pressure hoses—called hose reinforcement wire—do not only comprise iron and carbon but also other alloy and trace elements, some of which have a profound influence on the properties of the steel in terms of strength, ductility, formability, corrosion resistance and others. The following are possible constituents of the wire rod used for hose reinforcement wire:
The remainder of the steel is iron and other elements that have other influences on the steel:
The presence of chromium (0.005 to 0.30% wt), vanadium (0.005 to 0.30% wt), nickel (0.05-0.30% wt), molybdenum (0.05-0.25% wt) and boron traces may reduce the formation of grain boundary cementite for carbon contents above the eutectoid composition (0.80% wt C) and thereby improve the formability of the wire. Such alloying enables carbon contents of 0.90 to 1.20% wt, resulting in ultimate tensile strengths that can be higher as 4000 MPa in drawn wires.
Alternatively—for special applications wherein corrosion is a risk—hose reinforcement wire made from stainless steels may be employed. Preferred stainless steels contain a minimum of 12% Cr and a substantial amount of nickel. More preferred stainless steel compositions are austenitic stainless steels as these can easily be drawn to fine diameters. The more preferred compositions are those known in the art as AISI 302 (particularly the ‘Heading Quality’ HQ), AISI 301, AISI 304 and AISI 314. ‘AISI’ is the abbreviation of ‘American Iron and Steel Institute’.
Hose reinforcement wires predominantly have a round, circular cross section. However it has advantages to use flattened wires as disclosed in WO 2005/108846. The use of such flattened wires is a priory not excluded from the current invention. Round hose reinforcement wires are available in diameters from 0.15 to 0.80 mm in steps of 0.05 mm. Sometimes intermediate diameters such as 0.28, 0.33, 0.56, 0.61, or 0.71 mm are provided to accommodate for optimised standard hoses. In general in braided reinforcement layers wires with a diameter of less than or about 0.40 mm are used. For spiralled hoses mainly thicker wires are used up to 0.80 mm.
The tensile strength of a hose reinforcement wire is defined as the breaking load (the force at which the wire breaks, in N) divided by its metallic surface and is expressed in N/mm2 or MPa. There is no standardised classification system but in Europe and Asia—and for the purpose of this application—the following definition of ‘tensile classes’ are generally accepted:
Hose reinforcement wire is provided with an adhesive coating layer that can be zinc, copper or brass. Alternatively organic adhesion promoters can be provided on the wire.
A hose reinforcement wire has a ‘percentage total elongation at fracture At’ or simply ‘elongation at break’ as defined in ISO 6892:1998(E), item 4.4.3. It is the total elongation of the gauge length at the moment of fracture, expressed as a percentage of the original gauge length (in %). The elongation at break of the hose reinforcement wires of interest for this application comprises three components:
Within the context of this application an ‘E-ratio’ of a steel wire is defined as the ratio of the tensile strength divided by the elongation at break of that wire. It is expressed in units of N/mm2. It must be noted that this E-ratio—although it has the same units as a modulus—is not to be regarded as such. A modulus—as known from Hooke's law—implies the presence of a linear region in the stress-strain diagram starting at zero load and elongation. Wires of the current application may not show a linear region at all or at the most a very small one. The E-ratio corresponds to the slope of the line connecting the origin to the point at break in a stress-strain diagram.
The inventive hose is characterised in that the steel wires of the radially outermost steel wire reinforcement layer have the highest E-ratio, the steel wires of the innermost steel wire reinforcement layer have the lowest E-ratio. These lowest and highest E-ratio differ from one another. Further, the E-ratio of any steel wire reinforcement layer is not lower than the E-ratio of any inner laying steel wire reinforcement layer. This simply means that the E-ratio must increase or be equal when stepping through the steel reinforcement layers from the radially innermost to the radially outermost layer.
In a first preferred embodiment, this E-ratio is between 70 000 N/mm2 up to 200 000 N/mm2, or between 85 000 to 160 000 N/mm2 or even between 90 000 N/mm2 and 140 000 N/mm2 for the radially outermost steel wire reinforcement layer. The innermost steel wire reinforcement layer must have a lower E-ratio between 30 000 N/mm2 and 120 000 N/mm2, or between 40 000 and 110 000 or between 50 000 and 105 000 N/mm2 or between 50 000 and 90 000 N/mm2. Within a single embodiment, the ranges for radially outermost and innermost layer must be distinct and non-overlapping.
One of the main challenges when designing high pressure hoses remains the equal loading of the steel wires such that they all reach their maximum load capacity at the same pressure and that no layer is overloaded prematurely leading to an avalanche collapse of the remaining layers. The current invention solves this problem by adapting the E-ratio between the various layers.
A first way to change the E-ratio is to subject the steel wires of at least the innermost layer to a heat treatment, while the steel wires of at least the outermost layer are ‘as drawn’. Such a heat treatment is also known as “stress relieving treatment” and is performed by subjecting the steel wires to a high temperature above 350° C. and for a certain time in a protective atmosphere. An ‘as drawn’ wire is the wire as obtained from the wire drawing machine without any additional, intentional heat treatment applied. In this way the total elongation of the wire can be easily doubled with a loss in strength of at most 20%. An ‘as drawn’ steel wire with an E-ratio of ‘A’ will after thermal treatment show an E-ratio of A×0.425 or lower. It is indeed quite difficult to control this thermal treatment process and it is not possible to tune the process so that an E-ratio of above A×0.425 is obtained starting from a wire having an E-ratio ‘A’.
In a second preferred embodiment the steel wires of the outermost reinforcement layer comprises steel wires ‘as drawn’ i.e. without having been subjected to any thermal treatment and having an E-ratio of between 70 000 N/mm2 up to 200 000 N/mm2, or between 85 000 to 160 000 N/mm2 or even between 90 000 N/mm2 and 140 000 N/mm2. The steel wires of at least the innermost layer comprises steel wires that have been subjected to a thermal treatment and therefor have an E-ratio between 30 000 N/mm2 and 120 000 N/mm2, or between 40 000 and 110 000 or between 50 000 and 105 000 N/mm2 or between 50 000 and 90 000 N/mm2.
Another preferred way to change the E-ratio is to introduce bends or crimps in the wire. Preferably at least the steel wires of at least the innermost steel wire reinforcement layer have crimps or bends. The steel wires of the outermost reinforcement layer are then free of crimps or bends i.e. are not deformed (except of course to take the helicoidal path of the reinforcement). This is a third preferred embodiment.
With a bend is meant that, following the path of the wire in the hose, the wire is deflected unidirectional, always in the same direction, either left, left, left, . . . or right, right, right, . . . . It is readily clear that such a deformation will ultimately results in a path around some axis. This is by preference the axis of the hose around which the steel wire is helicoidally wound.
A bend in a wire is discernible by an abrupt change in direction of the wire along its path. Alternatively worded: a wire with a bend will show a changing radius of curvature when travelling along the wire. At the bend, the curvature will increase (i.e. the radius of curvature is small) compared to the curvature of the segments in between where the curvature is close to zero (i.e. the radius of curvature is large).
A crimp is two bends following one another wherein the bending direction of the first bend is opposite to that of the following bend. The wire shows an alternating sequence of bends in opposite directions (left, right, left, right, . . . ) within a single plane. The wire takes a zig-zag shape.
Crimps in different planes can also be combined in order to impart an even higher structural elongation to a wire. For example a first crimp can be made in a first plane while this crimped wire is subsequently crimped in a second plane substantially perpendicular to the first plane. Two single crimps are then observable in two view directions that are perpendicular to one another. The advantage of having a bi-plane crimped reinforcement wire is that the same amount of elongation at break can be obtained within a smaller circumscribed cylinder around the wire than with a wire having a single crimp in one plane.
Altering the E-ratio of the steel wires through bending or crimping the wire offers some advantages over thermal treatments:
For example the elongation at break of the steel wires with crimps or bends can be tuned to be at least 0.3% higher than the elongation at break of the straight wire. At the other extreme, an extra structural elongation of plus 4% compared to the straight wire can be easily build-in into the wire. By preference an additional elongation of between 0.3 to 3% or 0.3 to 2%, or even between 0.3 to 1.5% can possibly build-in into the steel wire. This is a fourth preferred embodiment.
For ease of logistics and stock keeping, it is best that the steel wires for at least the innermost and outermost reinforcement layers are of the same tensile class. Also preferred is if the steel wires are not only of the same tensile class but also of the same diameter. The wires of at least the innermost reinforcement layer then only differ from those the outermost layer in that the former ones have received a thermal treatment or are provided with crimps or bends while the latter ones are free of thermal treatment and/or crimps or bends.
For example the steel wires of the outermost reinforcement layer and the innermost reinforcement layer originate from one same diameter and tensile strength class whereby the outermost reinforcement layer is in the as drawn state having an E-ratio ‘A’, while the innermost layer has been subjected to a heat treatment such that its E-ratio is 0.425×A or lower.
Alternatively, in a highly preferred embodiment, by bending or crimping the ‘as drawn’ wire having an E-ratio of ‘A’ the inventors can tune the E-ratio to become between 0.33×A to 0.95×A or better between 0.50×A and 0.90×A to a precise and consistent degree.
By preference the bending or crimping is done with a fixed periodicity i.e. there is a fixed distance between successive bends or the crimps have a specific, fixed wavelength. The preforming of bends and crimps given to the steel wires should not be confused with the up and down movement of the steel wire ribbons in a braided configuration. The periodicity of the bends or the wavelength of the crimp differs from the periodicity of the interweaving pattern of the braid. Hence, the wire bends induced by braiding are specifically excluded from being bends or crimps according the invention.
According a second aspect of the invention, a method is disclosed for making the hose as described above. The method comprises the steps of:
With the characteristic feature that the steel wires of said innermost steel wire reinforcement layer have an E-ratio that is lower than the E-ratio of the steel wires of said radially outermost steel wire reinforcement layer, whereby the E-ratio of any steel wire reinforcement layer is not lower than the E-ratio of any inner laying steel wire reinforcement layer.
Preferably the method above is preceded by applying a thermal treatment on the steel wires of at least the innermost steel wire reinforcement layer such that they show an E-ratio between 30 000 and 120 000 N/mm2 while the E-ratio of the steel wires of at least the outermost steel wire reinforcement layer is between 70 000 N/mm2 and 200 000 N/mm2.
Alternatively and even more preferred is if the above method is preceded by the preforming of the steel wires of at least the innermost steel wire reinforcement layer with a preforming device that induces crimps or bends into said steel wires. The preforming of the wires can be done per single wire for example by the supplier of the wire prior to winding on the customer spool. Alternatively, the preforming can be done off-line on the bobbin winders during winding of the steel wires on the machine bobbins before they are mounted on the braider or the spiralling machine. Here the wires can either be preformed individually (one preforming device per wire) or in group (one preforming device per group of wires). The latter is somewhat preferred as it reduces the number of preforming devices. In group preforming results also in a synchronised bending or crimping making the ribbons more closed as compared to individual crimping wherein gaps form between the individual filaments of a ribbon.
A preferred alternative is if the preforming of the steel wires is performed concurrently with, in-line with, during the winding of said innermost steel wire reinforcement layer. This can be done by mounting the preforming device on the spiral winder or braider of the hose building machine. The tension of the spiral winder or braider—about 8 to 10 N—is already sufficient to induce a bend or crimp on the steel wire. The preforming is then ‘in-line’
The preforming device can for example comprise a rotatable pin of substantially polygonal shape where over said steel wires are led under tension thereby inducing periodical unidirectional bends on said steel wires. By preference a group of steel wires—for example as in a braiding ribbon—are led simultaneously over the rotatable pin. In this way bends are induced in phase and of equal bending degree between steel wires and the number of rotating preforming pins can be minimised.
The preforming device can alternatively comprise a pair of intermeshing crimping wheels where between said steel wires are led thereby inducing periodical bi-directional crimps in said wires. Again steel wires can be grouped and led together between said crimping wheels resulting in steel wires that are crimped in phase with equal amplitude. Grouping the wires also leads to a reduced number of crimping devices.
According a third aspect of the invention, a hose building machine is claimed. The hose building machine can be a wire spiral machine wherein wires are wound individually or grouped around a centrally moving intermediate hose body. At least for every spindle axis of the first deposition carrousel a preforming device is provided. Alternatively the hose building machine can be a braiding machine. At least the spool carriers of the firstly deposited steel wire reinforcement are equipped with a wire preforming device. The preforming device induced crimps or bends onto the wire when being pulled through.
According a further aspect of the invention a rewinder for rewinding customer spools to braider bobbins is claimed. A number (5 to 17) of steel wires are wound at equal tension from customer spools in a ribbon onto the braider bobbin. The ribbon of steel wires is preformed in a unidirectional bends or bidirectional crimps by a bending or crimping device mounted before or after the beak of the rewinder. The wires in one ribbon are all crimped or bend with the same wavelength, amplitude and phase.
While for a thick walled isotropic tube under high pressure the hoop, radial and axial stresses can be calculated by the laws of continuum mechanics, a steel wire reinforced hose is a more intricate system due to the non-isotropy of the load carrying members—the steel wires—and the large differences in material behaviour of the steel and the elastomer material. Therefore the inventors resorted to finite element modelling in order to corroborate their ideas.
In a first embodiment a braided hose of following build was analysed:
In order to evaluate the model the tensile properties of a conventional steel wire was used for both reinforcement layers. The force (F (in N)) Elongation (in %) curve of the wire is depicted in
According a first preferred braided hose embodiment of the invention the steel wires of the innermost reinforcement layer have been thermally treated while the steel wires of the outermost reinforcement layer are left unaltered i.e. as drawn with the same force elongation diagram as of
In a second preferred braided hose embodiment, the steel wires of the innermost reinforcement layer were subjected to a crimping treatment. The untreated wire (with the load—elongation according
εstructural˜(a/λ)2
For this particular case the wire had received a crimp of wavelength 5.3 mm with amplitude ‘a’ of 0.238 mm. This resulted in an extra elongation of about 2% giving a total elongation at break of 4.5%. The breaking load only slightly decreased to 178 N. The tensile strength was 2600 MPa resulting in an E-ratio of 57 873 MPa which is well below the original 107 689 MPa value of the original wire by a factor of 0.537.
A second steel wire of 0.30 mm diameter originally had a breaking load of 183 N resulting in a tensile strength of 2590 N/mm2 (Normal Tensile strength). The elongation at break was 2.3%. After crimping the steel wire showed an amplitude ‘a’ of 0.115 mm and a wavelength ‘λ’ of 5.2 mm. The breaking load was 172 N at an elongation of break of 3.0% i.e. an increase of elongation of 0.7%. Hence the original E-ratio of 113 000 N/mm2 decreased to 81 000 N/mm2 or a factor of 0.717 by the crimping. These two examples illustrate that crimping allows to control the E-ratio very well.
When now considering a hose of equal build as the conventional one wherein the steel wires of the innermost reinforcement layer are replaced with crimped wires and the outermost reinforcement layers with the same wire but free of crimps the loading of the filaments is remarkably equal for all wires. This is depicted in
In
In
The spiralled hose has four steel wire reinforcement layers, situated at four discrete radii. The steel wires are wound in alternating directions (S, Z, S, Z) under slightly increasing winding angles—all close to the neutral angle—when progressing from the inner reinforcement layer to the outer reinforcement layer as is customarily in the field. The wires are of diameter 0.60 mm in all embodiments following:
In a conventional embodiment all wires are straight and not thermally treated. They have a tensile strength of 2900 N/mm2 (HT class) and an elongation at break of 2.5%. The E-ratio of all the steel wires is thus 116000 N/mm2. The Load—Elongation curve of the Conventional Wire (CW) is illustrated in
When now the steel wires of the two innermost layers L1 and L2 are replaced with thermally treated wires (designated ‘HE a’ (High Elongation)) a first preferred spiralled hose embodiment is obtained. The heat treatment of the wires results in an increase of the elongation at break to about 4% with only a little loss in tensile strength. The E-ratio of the steel wire of which the load—elongation curve is illustrated in
The forces acting on the steel wires of the different reinforcement layers as a function of pressure in this first preferred spiralled hose embodiment are illustrated in
In a second preferred spiralled hose embodiment the steel wires of the inner layers L1 and L2 are replaced with steel wires with bends by guiding conventional 0.60 mm wires under tension over a polygonal wheel. The bends increase the elongation at break of the wire from 2.5% up to 4.5% with only a small decrease in breaking load: from 820 N to 778 N. The E-ratio of the steel wire reduces from 116 000 N/mm2 (conventional wires) to 61147 N/mm2. The bends are outwardly oriented relative to the axis of the hose. The outer two layers L3 and L4 are made of conventional wires.
The force per wire of the wires in the different layers as a function of the pressure is presented in
| Number | Date | Country | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 13175073 | Jul 2013 | EP | regional |
| Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| PCT/EP2014/063471 | 6/26/2014 | WO | 00 |
| Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| WO2015/000773 | 1/8/2015 | WO | A |
| Number | Name | Date | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 4273160 | Lowles | Jun 1981 | A |
| 4722210 | Bourgois | Feb 1988 | A |
| 7328725 | Henry | Feb 2008 | B2 |
| 20060081319 | Fukutani | Apr 2006 | A1 |
| 20070034275 | Henry | Feb 2007 | A1 |
| Number | Date | Country |
|---|---|---|
| 0200253 | Nov 1986 | EP |
| 2005-291466 | Oct 2005 | JP |
| 9516816 | Jun 1995 | WO |
| 9928547 | Jun 1999 | WO |
| 9250464 | Jun 2002 | WO |
| 2005108846 | Nov 2005 | WO |
| 2007020503 | Feb 2007 | WO |
| Entry |
|---|
| International Search Report dated Sep. 16, 2014, for PCT/EP2014/063471. |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 20160136918 A1 | May 2016 | US |
