Opinion dated Oct. 1, 2002 from the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit in the case of Zevo Golf Company, Inc. v. Karsten Manufacturing Corp. and Ping, Inc. |
Affidavit of Peter Joseph Shanks, dated Jun. 19, 2001. |
Answer of Defendants Karsten Manufacturing Corporation and Ping, Inc. |
First Amended Answer and Counterclaim of Defendants Karsten Manufacturing Corporation and Ping, Inc. |
Order Granting Plaintiff's Motion for Partial Summary Judgment that the ′155 Patent has Priority; Granting Plaintiff's Motion for Partial Summary Judgment that the Claims of the ′155 Patent are not invalid under 35 U.S.C. §§ 102 and 103; Denying Plaintiff's Partial Summary Judgment Motion that Defendants Infringe Claim 7 of the ′155 Patent; Granting in Part, Denying in Part Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment Of Non-Infringement and Invalidity (docket Nos. 91, 93, 105, 107, 110, 112). |
Contingent Counterclaims of Karsten Manufacturing Corporation and Ping, Inc. |
Memorandum of Points and Authorities in Support of Zevo's Motion for Partial Summary Judgment that the ′155 Patent has Priority. |
Notice of Motion and Motion for Leave to File First Amended Answer and Counterclaims; Memorandum of Points and Authorities in Support Thereof. |
Zevo's Reply to Defendants' Opposition to Zevo's Motion for Partial Summary Judgment that the ′155 Patent has Priority. |
Defendant's Memorandum in Support of Motion for Summary Judgment of Non-Infringement of and Invalidity of U.S. patent No. 5,851,155. |
Plaintiff's Memorandum of Points and Authorities in Support of Motion for Partial Summary Judgment that Defendants Infringe Claim 7 of the ′155 Patent. |
Plaintiff's Memorandum of Points and Authorities in Support of Motion for Partial Summary Judgment that the Claims of the ′155 Patent are not Invalid Under 35 U.S.C. §§ 102 and 103. |
Memorandum of Points and Authorities in Support of Zevo's Motion for Partial Summary Judgment that the ′155 Patent has Priority. |
Zevo's Memorandum of Points and Authorities in Opposition to Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment Of Non-Infringement and Invalidity of U.S. patent No. 5,851,155. |
Defendant's Memorandum in Opposition to Plaintiff's Motion for Partial Summary Judgment that Defendants Infringe Claim 7 of the ′155 Patent. |
Defendant's Memorandum in Opposition to Plaintiff's Motion for Partial Summary Judgment. that the claims [1 and 7] of the ′155 Patent are not Invalid Under 35 U.S.C. §§ 102 and 103. |
Karsten Manufacturing Corporation's and Ping, Inc.'s Exhibits in Support of Defendants' Memoranda in Opposition to Zevo's Motions for Summary Judgment. |
Zevo's Reply Memorandum of Points and Authorities in Support of Plaintiff's Motion for Partial Summary Judgment that Claims of the ′155 Patents are not Invalid Under 35 U.S.C. §§ 102 and 103. |
Zevo's Reply to Defendants' Opposition to Zevo's Motion for Partial Summary Judgment that the ′155 Patent has Priority. |
Zevo's Reply Memorandum of Points and Authorities in Support of Plaintiff's Motion for Partial Summary Judgment of Infringement of No. 5,851,155. |
Defendant's Reply Memorandum in Support of their Motion for Summary Judgment. |
Zevo's Memorandum of Points and Authorities in Response to Court Inquiry at Hearing on Motions for Summary Judgment and Notice of Subsequent Decision. |
Zevo's Memorandum of Contentions of Fact and Law. |
Donahue, Steve, “Finding the Right Fit,” Golf Shop Operations, May 1997, p. 27. |
“Dynamic Lie,” Golf Tips, Mar. 1998, p. 69. |
Pro Shop John, “Interview—Ping's John Solheim,” www.golfonline.com, Feb. 5, 1998. |
Gazze, Shannon, “Tour of Ping Plant Proves Educational,” www.golfarizona.com. |
“Ping to Introduce Custom-Fit Stainless Steel 13 Driver—Another Golf Industry First,” www.hoover'sonline.com, Nov. 17, 2000. |
Ping Press Release from Bob Cantin, Director of Communications, Dec. 11, 1997, New Ping ISI Titanium (TISI) Largest Custom-Fit Driver in Industry. |