HOT-ROLLED STEEL SHEET FOR HIGH STRENGTH LINEPIPE

Abstract
A hot-rolled steel sheet for a high strength linepipe having a metallic structure composed of bainitic-ferrite and a method for making the same. The steel sheet having a chemical composition containing, by mass %, C: 0.02% or more and 0.06% or less, Si: 0.05% or more and 0.25% or less, Mn: 0.60% or more and 1.10% or less, P: 0.008% or less, S: 0.0010% or less, Nb: 0.010% or more and 0.060% or less, Ti: 0.001% or more and 0.020% or less, Mo: 0.05% or less, Cr: 0.05% or more and 0.50% or less, Al: 0.01% or more and 0.08% or less, Ca: 0.0005% or more and 0.0050% or less, O: 0.005% or less, one or more selected from among Cu: 0.50% or less, Ni: 0.50% or less, and V: 0.10% or less, and the balance being Fe and inevitable impurities, in which the ratio of the hardness of a center segregation part to the hardness of a non-segregation part is less than 1.20 and the relationship SP≦1.90 is satisfied.
Description
TECHNICAL FIELD

This application is directed to a hot-rolled steel sheet having hydrogen induced cracking resistance (hereinafter, called HIC resistance) and a strength of X52 or more in accordance with API (American Petroleum Institute) standards which can preferably be used as a material for an electric resistance welded steel pipe. The electric resistant welded steel pipe is used as a line pipe for transporting energy resources such as crude oil and a natural gas. This application also relates to a method for manufacturing the steel sheet.


BACKGROUND

Although UOE steel pipes have been mainly used for linepipes to date from the viewpoint of transport efficiency because UOE steel pipes can be manufactured to have a large diameter and a large thickness, high strength electric resistance welded steel pipes, which are manufactured with a high productivity from less expensive material, hot-rolled steel sheets, in a coil shape (hot-rolled steel strips), are being increasingly used instead of UOE steel pipes nowadays. Electric resistance welded steel pipes have an advantage in that they are superior to UOE steel pipes in terms of variation in wall thickness and roundness in addition to cost. On the other hand, since the pipe production method for electric resistance welded steel pipes involves cold roll forming, it is characteristic that, when pipe production is performed, plastic strain given to the cold-rolled steel pipes is significantly large compared to that given to UOE steel pipes.


Nowadays, in exploitation of crude oil and natural gas, there is an increasing tendency for oil fields and gas fields to be developed in the polar areas or in deeper regions due to an increase in the demand for energy and due to the progress of drilling technology. Linepipes which are used at such places are required to have so-called sour resistance such as HIC resistance and sulfate stress corrosion cracking resistance (SSC) in addition to strength, toughness and weldability. In the case of linepipes, which are not subjected to stress after having been laid, HIC resistance is particularly important.


HIC is a phenomenon in which hydrogen ions, which have been generated by a corrosion reaction, increase internal pressure by becoming hydrogen atoms at the surface of a steel sheet, by entering the steel, and by accumulating around inclusions such as MnS, around carbides having a large grain diameter such as NbC, and around a second hard phase so as to cause the steel material to eventually crack. In addition, in the case where a steel material is given plastic strain, since many dislocations are formed around the inclusions, the carbides, and the second hard phase mentioned above, hydrogen atoms are more likely to accumulate, which results in HIC being more likely to occur.


To date, various solutions have been proposed in order to solve the problem of HIC described above.


Patent Literature 1 discloses a method for improving HIC resistance in which inclusions, which become the origins of HIC, are rendered harmless by controlling the total contents of chemical elements which combine respectively with S (sulfur), O (oxygen), and N (nitrogen) to form inclusions to be 0.01% or less or by controlling the maximum diameter of inclusions to be 5 μm or less, and in which the hardness of a center segregation part is controlled to be Hv 330 or less.


Patent Literature 2 discloses a method for decreasing the area ratio of HIC by decreasing the size of TiN grains, which become the origin of HIC. Specifically, the size of Al—Ca-based sulfides in molten steel is decreased by controlling a weight ratio CaO/Al2O3 to be 1.2 to 1.5 as a result of controlling the contents of Al and Ca in order to control the grain diameter of Al—Ti—Ca-based compound inclusions, which are formed using the sulfides as nuclei, to be 30 μm or less.


In addition, Patent Literature 3 discloses a method in which the formation of carbonitrides of Nb and Ti, which become the origins of HIC, is less likely to occur by controlling Nb concentration to be 0.06% or less and Ti concentration to be 0.025% or less in a region located at a distance in the thickness direction of 5% of the thickness from the central part in the thickness direction.


Patent Literature 4 discloses a method for manufacturing a high strength linepipe excellent in terms of HIC resistance in which HIC resistance is improved by decreasing the degree of center segregation as a result of decreasing Mn content in steel and in which Cr and Mo, which are comparatively less likely to undergo center segregation, are utilized.


CITATION LIST
Patent Literature

[PTL 1] Japanese Unexamined Patent Application Publication No. 2006-63351


[PTL 2] Japanese Patent No. 4363403 (International Publication No. WO2005/075694)


[PTL 3] Japanese Unexamined Patent Application Publication No. 2011-63840


[PTL 4] Japanese Patent No. 2647302 (Japanese Unexamined Patent Application Publication No. 5-271766)


SUMMARY
Technical Problem

However, in the case of the technique according to Patent Literature 1, since the hardness of a center segregation part is still high, there is a problem in that sufficient HIC resistance cannot be achieved in the case of an electric resistance welded steel pipe, which is given large plasticity when forming is performed, even if it is possible to render inclusions, which become the origins, harmless.


In addition, in the case of the techniques according to Patent Literature 2 and Patent Literature 3, since no specific measure is taken in order to control the hardness of a center segregation part, there is still a problem in that a large HIC occurs in the case of an electric resistance welded steel pipe even if it is possible to render inclusions, which become the origins, harmless.


In addition, in the case of the technique according to Patent Literature 4, since there is an increase in the hardness of a center segregation part as a result of the formation of a second hard phase such as martensite being promoted by the excessive addition of Cr and Mo, there is a problem in that it is necessary to further decrease the hardness of a center segregation part in the case of an electric resistance welded steel pipe, which is given a large plasticity when forming is performed.


Disclosed embodiments have been completed in view of the problems described above, and an object of the disclosed embodiments is to provide an electric resistance welded steel pipe for a high strength linepipe excellent in terms of HIC resistance which can preferably be used for an electric resistance welded steel linepipe and with which, for example, a crack length ratio (herein after, called CLR) is 15% or less when HIC occurs after the linepipe is given 10% of plastic strain.


Here, “excellent in terms of HIC resistance” refers to a case where a crack length ratio (CLR) is 15% or less after a steel sheet has been immersed in a NACE solution (NACE TM-0284 solution A: 5% NaCl+0.5% CH3OOH, 1 atmosphere of saturated H2S, and pH=3.0 to 4.0) for 96 hours.


Solution to Problem

Disclosed embodiments have been completed in order to decrease the hardness of a center segregation part and in order to achieve desired strength on the basis of the knowledge which has been obtained by conducting many experiments regarding the relationship between the hardness of a center segregation part and steel chemical composition and the relationship of constituent microstructures to HIC performance and manufacturing conditions.


First, the relationship between the HIC performance of a product and the hardness of a center segregation part was investigated. As a result, it was found that it is possible to achieve a crack length rate (CLR) of 15% or less in the case where the Vickers hardness of a center segregation part is HV 230 or less. The finding, that is, the fact that the hardness of a center segregation part is controlled in order to improve HIC resistance, is conventionally known as described in Patent Literature 1.


However, from the results of further collecting the data of products, since it was found that there is a case where a CLR is more than 15% even if the highest hardness of a center segregation part is controlled to be Hv 230 or less, the reason for that was investigated from the viewpoint of material uniformity. FIG. 1 illustrates the relationship between the hardness ratio of a center segregation part to a non-segregation part (the Vickers hardness of a center segregation part/the Vickers hardness of a non-segregation part) and a crack length ratio (CLR). As FIG. 1 indicates, it was found that a CLR is 15% or less in the case where the hardness ratio is 1.20 or less.


This is thought to be because, in the case where hardness distribution in the thickness direction is not uniform, since strain is concentrated at the interface between a portion having a high hardness in a center segregation part and the other portion when a steel sheet is given large plastic strain, the interface becomes the trap site of hydrogen atoms.


Subsequently, by investigating the chemical composition of steel, with which a hardness ratio of a center segregation part to a non-segregation part being less than 1.20 is achieved, an SP value (=Mn+Mo+11.3×C+0.29×(Cu+Ni)+0.60×Cr+0.88×V) was derived by incorporating the segregation coefficients of constituent chemical elements in continuously cast slab, which had been calculated using a unique computation simulation, into the carbon equivalent equation (CEQ=C+Mn/6+(Cr+Mo+V)/5+(Cu+Ni)/15). FIG. 2 illustrates the relationship between the hardness ratio of a center segregation part to a non-segregation part and an SP value. From the results, it was found that it is necessary to control an SP value to be 1.90 or less in order to control the hardness ratio of a center segregation part to a non-segregation part to be less than 1.20.


Disclosed embodiments have been completed on the basis of the knowledge described above and further investigations, and the subject matter of the disclosed embodiments is as follows.


[1] A hot-rolled steel sheet for a high strength linepipe excellent in terms of HIC resistance, the steel sheet having a chemical composition containing, by massa, C: 0.02% or more and 0.06% or less, Si: 0.05% or more and 0.25% or less, Mn: 0.60% or more and 1.10% or less, P: 0.008% or less, S: 0.0010% or less, Nb: 0.010% or more and 0.060% or less, Ti: 0.001% or more and 0.020% or less, Mo: 0.05% or less, Cr: 0.05% or more and 0.50% or less, Al: 0.01% or more and 0.08% or less, Ca: 0.0005% or more and 0.0050% or less, O: 0.005% or less, one or more selected from among Cu: 0.50% or less, Ni: 0.50% or less, and V: 0.10% or less, and the balance being Fe and inevitable impurities, and a metallic structure composed of bainitic-ferrite, in which expression (1) below is satisfied, and in which the ratio of the hardness of a center segregation part to the hardness of a non-segregation part is less than 1.20.






SP≦1.90  (1),


where SP is derived from SP=Mn+Mo+11.3×C+0.29×(Cu+Ni)+0.60×Cr+0.88×V, and where atomic symbols in the equation respectively represent the contents (mass %) of the corresponding chemical elements.


[2] The hot-rolled steel sheet for a high strength linepipe excellent in terms of HIC resistance according to item [1], the steel sheet having the chemical composition, in which expression (2) below is satisfied.





1.2≦EC≦4.0  (2),


where EC is expressed by EC=[Ca]eff/(1.25×S), where [Ca]eff is derived from Ca−(0.18+130×Ca)×O, and where atomic symbols Ca, S, and O in the equations respectively represent the contents (mass %) of the corresponding chemical elements.


[3] The hot-rolled steel sheet for a high strength linepipe excellent in terms of HIC resistance according to item [1] or [2], the steel sheet having the chemical composition, in which the ratio of the hardness of a center segregation part to the hardness of a non-segregation part is less than 1.20.


[4] A method for manufacturing a hot-rolled steel sheet for a high strength linepipe excellent in terms of HIC resistance, the method including heating a steel slab having the chemical composition according to item [1] or [2] at a temperature of 1100° C. or higher and 1300° C. or lower, performing rough rolling, thereafter performing finish rolling under condition that cumulative rolling reduction ratio is 20% or more in a temperature range of 930° C. or lower, performing accelerated cooling on the hot-rolled steel sheet to a temperature of 380° C. or higher and 600° C. or lower at an average cooling rate of 5° C./sec. or more and 100° C./sec. or less in terms of the temperature of the central part in the thickness direction, and coiling the cooled steel sheet into a coil shape.


Advantageous Effects

According to embodiments, by strictly controlling the hardness of a center segregation part through optimization of the steel microstructure, it is possible to manufacture a hot-rolled steel sheet for an electric resistance welded steel linepipe that has an improved HIC resistance after formation of the electric resistance welded steel pipe, which has been subjected to large plastic strain and that can be used without any problem under a harsh environment equivalent to a NACE solution. In addition, the hot-rolled steel sheet manufactured according to embodiments can also be used for a spiral steel pipe for a linepipe.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF DRAWINGS


FIG. 1 is a diagram illustrating the relationship between (the hardness of a center segregation part/the hardness of a non-segregation part) and a crack length ratio (CLR) according to an embodiment;



FIG. 2 is a diagram illustrating the relationship between an SP value and (the hardness of a center segregation part/the hardness of a non-segregation part) according to an embodiment; and



FIG. 3 is a diagram illustrating the positions where the hardness of a center segregation part and the hardness of a non-segregation part were determined according to an embodiment.





DETAILED DESCRIPTION

The reasons for the features of the constituent elements of disclosed embodiments will be described hereafter.


1. Regarding Chemical Composition


First, the reasons for the features of the chemical composition of the steel according to embodiments be described. Here, % used when describing the chemical composition always represents mass %.


C: 0.02% or more and 0.06% or less


C is a chemical element which significantly contributes to an increase in the strength of steel, and such an effect is realized in the case where the C content is 0.02% or more, but, in the case where the C content is more than 0.06%, since a second phase such as a pearlite microstructure is likely to be formed, there is a deterioration in HIC resistance. Therefore, the C content is set to be in a range of 0.02% or more and 0.06% or less, or preferably in a range of 0.03% or more and 0.05% or less.


Si: 0.05% or more and 0.25% or less


Si is a chemical element which is added for solute strengthening and added in order to decrease scale-off quantity when hot rolling is performed, and such an effect is realized in the case where the Si content is 0.05% or more, but, in the case where the Si content is more than 0.25%, since red scale excessively grows, cooling ununiformity occurs when hot rolling is performed, which results in a deterioration in the uniformity of aesthetic appearance and material properties. Therefore, the Si content is set to be in a range of 0.05% or more and 0.25% or less, or preferably 0.10% or more and 0.25% or less. In addition, since there is a deterioration in toughness in an electric resistance weld zone as a result of forming of MnSi-based oxides when electric resistance welding is performed, it is preferable that Si be added so that the ratio Mn/Si be 4.0 or more and 12 or less.


Mn: 0.60% or more and 1.10% or less


Mn is a chemical element which contributes to an improvement in strength and toughness as a result of decreasing the grain diameter of a steel microstructure, and such an effect is realized in the case where the Mn content is 0.60% or more. On the other hand, in the case where the Mn content is increased, since a fine martensite microstructure is more likely to be formed in center segregation part, and since MnS, which becomes the origin of HIC, is more likely to be formed, it is necessary that the Mn content be controlled to be 1.10% or less. Therefore, the Mn content is set to be in a range of 0.60% or more and 1.10% or less, or preferably in a range of 0.75% or more and 1.05% or less.


P: 0.008% or less


Since P is a chemical element which is contained as an inevitable impurity, and since P deteriorates HIC resistance as a result of significantly increasing the hardness of a center segregation part, it is preferable that the P content be as small as possible, however, a P content of 0.008% or less is acceptable. Moreover, since there is an increase in cost due to an increase in refining time in order to markedly decrease the P content, it is preferable that the P content be 0.002% or more.


S: 0.0010% or less


Since S is, like P, a chemical element which is inevitably contained in steel, and since S forms MnS in steel, it is preferable that the S content be as small as possible, however, a S content of 0.0010% or less is acceptable, or preferably 0.0006% or less.


Nb: 0.010% or more and 0.060% or less


Nb is a chemical element which contributes to an increase in the strength of steel as a result of precipitating in the form of fine Nb carbonitrides in a coiling process when hot-rolled steel sheet is manufactured. Also, Nb is a chemical element which contributes to an improvement in the toughness of a weld zone as a result of inhibiting the growth of austenite grains when electric resistance welding is performed. Such effects are realized in the case where the Nb content is 0.010% or more. On the other hand, in the case where the Nb content is more than 0.060%, Nb carbonitrides having a large grain diameter, which become the origins of HIC, are more likely to be formed. Therefore, the Nb content is set to be in a range of 0.010% or more and 0.060% or less, or preferably in a range of 0.030% or more and 0.060% or less.


Ti: 0.001% or more and 0.020% or less


Ti is a chemical element which is added in order to render N, which significantly deteriorates the toughness of steel, harmless by fixing N in the form of TiN. Such an effect is realized in the case where the Ti content is more than 0.001%. On the other hand, in the case where the Ti content is more than 0.020%, since there is an increase in the amount of Ti carbonitrides which precipitate along the cleavage plane of Fe, there is a deterioration in the toughness of steel. Therefore, the Ti content is set to be in a range of 0.001% or more and 0.020% or less, or preferably in a range of 0.005% or more and 0.015% or less.


Mo: 0.05% or less


Mo is a chemical element which is significantly effective for improving the toughness and strength of steel by improving hardenability, but, since Mo forms a martensite microstructure as a result of being concentrated in a center segregation part, there is a deterioration in HIC resistance. Therefore, it is preferable that the Mo content be as small as possible, however, a Mo content of 0.05% or less is acceptable. It is more preferable that the Mo content be 0.01% or less.


Cr: 0.05% or more and 0.50% or less


Cr is a chemical element which is effective for improving the toughness and strength of steel by improving hardenability, and such an effect is realized in the case where the Cr is added 0.05% or more, but, in the case where the Cr is added more than 0.50%, there is a significant deterioration in the toughness of a weld zone as a result of forming Cr oxides when electric resistance welding is performed. In order to inhibit such a deterioration, the Cr content is set to be in a range of 0.05% or more and 0.50% or less, or preferably in a range of 0.05% or more and 0.300 or less.


Al: 0.01% or more and 0.08% or less


Although Al is added as a deoxidation agent, there is insufficient deoxidation effect in the case where the Al content is less than 0.01%, and, on the other hand, there is a deterioration in HIC resistance and toughness due to an increase in the amount of Al-based oxides having a large grain diameter which are retained in steel in the case where the Al content is more than 0.08%. Therefore, the Al content is set to be in a range of 0.01% or more and 0.08% or less, or preferably in a range of 0.01% or more and 0.05% or less.


Ca: 0.0005% or more and 0.0050% or less


Ca is a chemical element which is effective for improving HIC resistance by controlling the shape of sulfide-based inclusions, and such an effect is realized in the case where the Ca content is 0.0005% or more. On the other hand, in the case where the Ca content is more than 0.0050%, such an effect becomes saturated, and, in addition, there is a deterioration in HIC resistance as a result of forming a large amount of Ca oxides. Therefore, the Ca content is set to be in a range of 0.0005% or more and 0.0050% or less, or preferably in a range of 0.0010% or more and 0.0030% or less.


O: 0.005% or less


Since oxygen deteriorates hot workability, corrosion resistance, toughness, and HIC resistance as a result of forming various oxides, it is preferable that the oxygen content be as small as possible, however, an oxygen content of 0.005% or less is acceptable, or preferably 0.00350 or less.


In embodiments, one or more selected from among Cu, Ni, and V may be further added in the amounts described below.


Cu: 0.50% or less


Cu is a chemical element which contributes to an improvement in the toughness and strength of steel through an improvement in hardenability, and, since Cu is less likely to be concentrated in a center segregation part than Mn and Mo which have similar effect, Cu can increase the strength of steel without deteriorating HIC resistance. Therefore, Cu is added in accordance with the strength grade. Such an effect is realized in the case where the Cu content is 0.05% or more, but, in the case where the Cu content is more than 0.50%, the effect becomes saturated and there is an unnecessary increase in cost. Therefore, the Cu content is 0.50% or less, or preferably 0.40% or less.


Ni: 0.50% or less


Ni is, like Cu, a chemical element which contributes to an improvement in the toughness and strength of steel through an improvement in hardenability, and, since Ni is less likely to be concentrated in a center segregation part than Mn and Mo which have a similar effect, Ni can increase the strength of steel without deteriorating HIC resistance. Therefore, Ni is added in accordance with the strength grade. Such an effect is realized in the case where the Ni content is 0.05% or more, but, in the case where the Ni content is more than 0.50%, the effect becomes saturated and there is an unnecessary increase in cost. Therefore, the Ni content is 0.50% or less, or preferably 0.40% or less.


V: 0.10% or less


V is a chemical element which contributes to an increase in the strength of steel through solute strengthening and precipitation strengthening in the case where the V content is 0.005% or more, but, in the case where the V content is more than 0.10%, since there is an increase in the hardness of a center segregation part, there is a deterioration in HIC resistance. Therefore, the V content is set to be 0.10% or less, or preferably 0.080% or less.


SP: 1.90 or less


In embodiments, an SP value, which is derived from the contents of various alloy chemical elements, satisfies expression (1) below.






SP≦1.90  (1),


where SP is derived from SP=Mn+Mo+11.3×C+0.29×(Cu+Ni)+0.60×Cr+0.88×V, where atomic symbols in the equation respectively represent the contents (mass %) of the corresponding chemical elements, and where the atomic symbol of a chemical element which is not added is assigned a value of 0 (zero).


An SP value was formulated in order to estimate the hardness of a center segregation part of a hot-rolled steel sheet which is used as a raw material of an electric resistance welded steel pipe using the contents of various alloy chemical elements, and, since the chemical elements are markedly concentrated in a center segregation part in the case where the SP value is more than 1.90, the condition that the hardness ratio of a center segregation part to a non-segregation part is less than 1.20 is not satisfied. In addition, since the hardness ratio of a center segregation part to a non-segregation part decreases with decreasing SP value, it is necessary to control the upper limit of the SP value to be, for example, 1.75 in the case where it is required that HIC resistance be further improved in order to achieve a CLR of 5% or less.


EC: 1.2 or more and 4.0 or less


Moreover, in embodiments, it is preferable that an EC value which is described below satisfy expression (2) below in order to effectively render sulfide-based inclusions harmless by adding Ca.





1.2≦EC≦4.0  (2),


where EC is expressed by EC=[Ca]eff/(1.25×S), where [Ca]eff is derived from Ca−(0.18+130×Ca)×0, and where atomic symbols Ca, S, and O in the equations respectively represent the contents (mass %) of the corresponding chemical elements.


The EC value indicates whether the content of Ca, which is added in order to control the shape of sulfide-based inclusions, is sufficient to form CaS, and the Ca content is insufficient in the case where the EC value is less than 1.2, which results in MnS, which becomes the origin of HIC, being formed. On the other hand, in the case where the EC value is more than 4.0, since Ca-based oxides are formed in a large amount, there is a deterioration in HIC resistance due to a deterioration in the cleaning level of steel. Therefore, it is preferable that the EC value be in a range of 1.2 or more and 4.0 or less, or more preferably in a range of 1.4 or more and 3.6 or less.


Here, the remainder of the chemical elements other than constituents described above consists of Fe and inevitable impurities. However, other trace elements may be added as long as the effects of the disclosed embodiments are not decreased.


2. Regarding Metallic Structure


Subsequently, the metallic structure according to embodiments will be described.


It is necessary to form a metallic structure composed of a bainitic-ferrite microstructure in order to achieve not only a high strength of X52 (a YS of more than 380 MPa) or more in accordance with API standards but also minimum required toughness (a ductile-brittle transition temperature of −60° C. or lower in a Charpy impact test) for a steel pipe which is used for a linepipe. Since there is a deterioration in yield strength, toughness, and HIC resistance in the case where different kinds of microstructures such as ferrite, fine martensite, pearlite, and residual austenite exist in a bainitic-ferrite microstructure, it is preferable that the area fractions of the microstructures other than a bainitic-ferrite microstructure be as small as possible. However, in the case where the area fractions of the microstructures other than a bainitic-ferrite microstructure are markedly small, since the influences of the microstructures other than a bainitic-ferrite microstructure are negligible small, the microstructures other than a bainitic-ferrite microstructure may be included to some extent. Specifically, a microstructure having a total area fraction of the steel microstructures other than a bainitic-ferrite microstructure (such as a ferrite microstructure, a fine martensite microstructure, a pearlite microstructure, and a residual austenite microstructure) of less than 3′, may be considered to be a single bainitic-ferrite microstructure and is included in embodiments.


The metallic structure described above can be achieved by using steel having the chemical composition described above and the manufacturing method described below.


3. Regarding the Hardness of a Center Segregation Part


From the results of the investigations regarding the relationship between the results of the HIC test on an electric resistance welded steel linepipe and the hardness of a center segregation part of a steel sheet, it was found that there is a case where the condition that a CLR is 151 or less cannot be satisfied even if the Vickers hardness of a center segregation part is controlled to be Hv 230 or less. From the results of the investigations regarding the reason for that conducted from the viewpoint of material uniformity, it was found that, as FIG. 1 illustrates, the CLR is 151 or less in the case where the hardness ratio of a center segregation part to a non-segregation part (the Vickers hardness of a center segregation part/the Vickers hardness of a non-segregation part) is less than 1.20. Then, from the results of the investigations regarding a steel chemical composition with which the ratio of the hardness of a center segregation part to the hardness of a non-segregation part becomes less than 1.20, it was found that, as FIG. 2 illustrates, the SP value of the steel chemical composition with which the ratio of the hardness of a center segregation part to the hardness of a non-segregation part becomes less than 1.20 is 1.90 or less.


Here, the hardness of a center segregation part and the hardness of a non-segregation part were, as FIG. 3 illustrates, respectively determined for 15 points each on a center segregation line and in a portion located at 200 μm from the center segregation line, and the arithmetic average values of the determined values were derived, where the center segregation line was exposed by performing etching using a 2%-nital solution for a duration of 30 seconds or more on a test piece for microstructure observation.


4. Regarding Manufacturing Conditions


Subsequently, manufacturing conditions for achieving the steel microstructure described above will be described.


A slab heating temperature is set to be 1100° C. or higher and 1300° C. or lower. In the case where the temperature is lower than 1100° C., since the temperature is not high enough for carbides, which are formed in steel when continuous casting is performed, to completely form solid solutions, the required strength cannot be achieved. On the other hand, in the case where the temperature is higher than 1300° C., since there is a marked increase in austenite grain diameter, there is a deterioration in toughness. Here, this temperature refers to the temperature of the interior of the heating furnace, and the center of the slab is presumed to be heated to this temperature.


In finish rolling, it is necessary that finish rolling be performed under the condition that cumulative rolling reduction ratio is 20% or more at a temperature of 930° C. or lower. In the case where the cumulative rolling reduction ratio is less than 20%, since there are an insufficient number of nucleation sites of a bainitic-ferrite microstructure, there is an excessive increase in the grain diameter of the microstructure, which results in a deterioration in toughness. However, in the case where the cumulative rolling reduction ratio is more than 80%, since the effect becomes saturated, and since a very high load is applied to a rolling mill, it is preferable that the upper limit of the cumulative rolling reduction ratio be 80% or less.


The average cooling rate for the central part in the thickness direction of a steel sheet is set to be 5° C./sec. or more and 100° C./sec. or less. In the case where the cooling rate is less than 5° C./sec, the area fractions of a ferrite microstructure and/or a pearlite microstructure become 3% or more even if hardenability increasing chemical elements such as Cu, Ni, and Cr are added. Therefore, it is necessary that the cooling rate be 5° C./sec. or more. On the other hand, in the case where the cooling rate is more than 100° C./sec, the area fraction of a martensite microstructure becomes 3% or more. The cooling rate of the central part in the thickness direction of a steel sheet was calculated by deriving the temperature history of the central part in the thickness direction of the steel sheet by performing heat-transfer calculation using the cooling capacity (heat-transfer coefficient) of a run-out, which had been investigated in advance, and the surface temperature of the steel sheet, which had been determined using a radiation thermometer on the run-out.


The cooling stop temperature is set to be in a range of 380° C. or higher and 600° C. or lower. In the case where the cooling stop temperature is higher than 600° C., since the area fraction of a ferrite microstructure and a pearlite microstructure becomes 3% or more, and since there is an increase in the diameter of precipitation strengthening grains such as Nb carbonitrides, there is a decrease in strength. On the other hand, in the case where the cooling stop temperature is lower than 380° C., since there is an improvement in the deformation resistance of a steel sheet, it is difficult to coil the steel sheet into a coil shape, and there is a decrease in strength due to precipitation strengthening grains such as Nb carbonitrides not being precipitated.


Examples

By performing hot rolling on steel materials having the chemical compositions given in Table 1 under the hot rolling conditions and the cooling conditions given in Table 2, and by coiling the hot-rolled steel sheets, hot-rolled steel sheets having the thicknesses given in Table 2 were obtained. Here, steel grade G through K are comparative example steels having a chemical composition, SP value or the like which is out of the range according to disclosed embodiments.









TABLE 1





mass %



























Steel Grade
C
Si
Mn
P
S
Nb
Ti
Mo
Al
Ca
Cu
Ni





A
0.06
0.18
0.90
0.006
0.0004
0.045
0.012
0.01
0.045
0.0022




B
0.04
0.13
1.05
0.007
0.0005
0.025
0.010
0.01
0.040
0.0025




C
0.04
0.13
0.76
0.005
0.0004
0.042
0.008
0.02
0.038
0.0028
0.37
0.34


D
0.05
0.10
0.84
0.005
0.0004
0.035
0.009
0.01
0.033
0.0030
0.12
0.10


E
0.03
0.16
1.00
0.005
0.0004
0.035
0.009
0  
0.033
0.0030

0.09


F
0.05
0.13
1.03
0.006
0.0004
0.044
0.008
0  
0.042
0.0025
0.30
0.30


G
0.04
0.13

1.25

0.005
0.0006
0.028
0.008
0  
0.045
0.0025
0.17
0.14


H
0.04
0.13
1.05
0.006
0.0004
0.042
0.010

0.20

0.034
0.0021
0.15
0.15


I
0.06
0.13
1.00
0.008
0.0005
0.025
0.012
0  
0.055
0.0023
0.40
0.42


J
0.06
0.13
1.10
0.004
0.0006
0.055
0.013
0.03
0.035
0.0045




K
0.04
0.19

1.45

0.006
0.0009
0.034
0.009
0.17
0.040
0.0025




















Steel Grade
Cr
V
O
SP Value*1
EC Value*2
Note







A
0.15

0.0025
1.68
2.1
Example Steel



B
0.10

0.0017
1.57
2.6
Example Steel



C
0.10

0.0031
1.50
2.2
Example Steel



D
0.25

0.0022
1.63
3.5
Example Steel



E
0.30
0.080
0.0022
1.62
3.5
Example Steel



F
0.08
0.060
0.0025
1.87
2.5
Example Steel



G


0.0020
1.79
2.0
Comparative Example Steel



H


0.0018
1.79
2.6
Comparative Example Steel



I
0.08
0.045
0.0016

2.00

2.5
Comparative Example Steel



J

0.020
0.0015
1.83
4.5
Comparative Example Steel



K
0.10

0.0016
2.13
1.5
Comparative Example Steel







Annotation:



An underlined portion indicates a value out of the range according to embodiments.



*1 SP = Mn + Mo + 11.3 × C + 0.29 × (Cu + Ni) + 0.60 × Cr + 0.88 × V, where an atomic symbols in the equation respectively represent the contents (mass %) of the corresponding chemical elements.



*2 EC = [Ca]eff/(1.25 × S), where [Ca]eff is derived from Ca − (0.18 + 130 × Ca) × O, and where atomic symbols Ca, S, and O in the equations respectively represent the contents (mass %) of the corresponding chemical elements.





















TABLE 2











Average Cooling Rate
Cooling



Steel


Slab Heating
Cumulative Rolling
Finishing
of Central Part in
Stop



Sheet
Steel
Thickness
Temperature
Reduction Ratio in
Delivery
Thickness
Temperature


No.
Grade
(mm)
(° C.)
Finish Rolling (%)
Temperature (° C.)
Direction (° C./sec.)
(° C.)
Note























1
A
16
1250
40
820
25
540
Example


2
B
22
1200
55
810
80
500
Example


3
C
10
1200
25
840
50
450
Example


4
C
12
1200
45
840
20
500
Example


5
C
19
1200
55
810
10
520
Example


6
C
25
1200
65
810
25
560
Example


7
D
14
1200
40
820
60
420
Example


8
D
16
1200
40
820
55
480
Example


9
D
19
1200
55
810
30
530
Example


10
E
18
1150
55
810
10
510
Example


11
F
12
1200
33
830
15
500
Example


12
C
19
1350
55
810
20
520
Comparative Example


13
C
19
1200
15
810
20
520
Comparative Example


14
C
19
1200
55
820
2
520
Comparative Example


15
C
19
1200
55
820
20
650
Comparative Example


16

G

22
1200
60
810
30
550
Comparative Example


17

H

19
1200
55
810
10
540
Comparative Example


18

I

16
1150
40
820
15
540
Comparative Example


19

J

16
1250
40
820
15
540
Comparative Example


20

K

20
1250
55
830
10
540
Comparative Example





Annotation:


An underlined portion indicates a value out of the range according to embodiments.






Using test pieces which had been collected from the obtained hot-rolled steel sheet, and by performing microstructure observation, a tensile test, a Charpy impact test, hardness determination, and a HIC test, tensile properties, toughness, and HIC resistance were evaluated.


By collecting a test piece for microstructure observation from the obtained hot-rolled steel sheet, by polishing and etching a cross-section in the rolling direction, and by using an optical microscope (at a magnification of 400 times) and an electron scanning microscope (at a magnification of 1000 times), photographs were taken for 5 microscopic fields or more in the central part in the thickness direction of the steel sheet in order to observe the kinds of microstructures and whether or not steel microstructures other than a bainitic-ferrite microstructure (such as ferrite, fine martensite, pearlite, and residual austenite) existed.


A tensile test piece was collected from the obtained hot-rolled steel sheet so that the longitudinal direction was at a right angle to the rolling direction (C direction), and a tensile test was performed at room temperature in accordance with API-5L specification in order to determine yield strength YS (deformation stress for a nominal strain of 0.5%) and tensile strength TS.


A v-notched test piece was collected from the central part in the thickness direction of the obtained hot-rolled steel sheet so that the longitudinal direction was at a right angle to the rolling direction (C direction), and absorbed energy and a percent brittle fracture were determined by performing a Charpy impact test at a temperature range of −140° C. to 0° C. in accordance with JIS Z 2242 in order to determine a temperature (fracture transition temperature) at which a percent brittle fracture was 50%. Here, three test pieces were used for one temperature in order to obtain the arithmetic averages of the determined absorbed energy and percent brittle fracture.


The hardness of a center segregation part and the hardness of a non-segregation part were respectively determined for 15 points each on a segregation line and in a portion located at 200 μm from the segregation line, and the arithmetic average values of the determined values were derived, where the segregation line was exposed by performing etching using a 2%-nital solution for a duration of 30 seconds or more on a test piece for microstructure observation (FIG. 3). Here, the hardness was determined using a Vickers hardness meter with a testing force of 0.3 kgf. The hardness ratio was calculated by dividing the hardness of a segregation part by the hardness of a non-segregation part.


Using a HIC test piece having the thickness of the steel sheet, a width of 20 mm, and a length of 100 mm which was collected from the obtained hot-rolled steel sheet so that the longitudinal direction was the rolling direction of the steel sheet, a HIC test was performed using an A solution in accordance with NACE TM 0284 in order to evaluate HIC resistance. Here, 10 test pieces were used for one coil, and a compressive strain of 10% in a width direction was applied to the test pieces in advance in order to simulate plastic strain which is applied to a steel sheet when forming is performed in a process for manufacturing an electric resistance welded steel pipe. From the test results, in the case where CLR was 15% or less for all the test pieces for one coil, the coil was judged as satisfactory (◯) in terms of HIC resistance. In the case where the CLR was more than 15% for one or more of the test pieces for one coil, the coil was judged as unsatisfactory (x) in terms of HIC resistance.


The obtained results are given in Table 3.

















TABLE 3





Steel
Steel
Metallic

Tensile






Sheet No.
Grade
Structure
Yield Strength (MPa)
Strength (MPa)
Charpy (vTrs)
Hardness Ratio
HIC Resistance
Note























1
A
BF
511
585
−70
1.06

Example


2
B
BF
435
508
−120
1.04

Example


3
C
BF
490
557
−100
1.01

Example


4
C
BF
495
563
−125
1.01

Example


5
C
BF
489
563
−85
1.01

Example


6
C
BF
482
560
−95
1.01

Example


7
D
BF
480
546
−130
1.07

Example


8
D
BF
494
554
−100
1.07

Example


9
D
BF
497
563
−95
1.07

Example


10
E
BF
500
567
−80
1.06

Example


11
F
BF
534
616
−100
1.17

Example


12
C
BF
488
558
−40
1.02

Comparative Example


13
C
BF
516
573
−50
1.01

Comparative Example


14
C

BF + F + P

467
539
−50
1.02
x
Comparative Example


15
C

F + P

460
545
−45
1.02
x
Comparative Example


16

G

BF
472
547
−100
1.16
x
Comparative Example


17

H

BF
498
573
−110
1.15
x
Comparative Example


18

I

BF
476
548
−70

1.24

x
Comparative Example


19

J

BF
505
582
−60
1.17
x
Comparative Example


20

K

BF
533
600
−100

1.30

x
Comparative Example





Annotation:


An underlined portion indicates a value out of the range according to embodiments.






The examples according to embodiments were all steel sheets having a high yield strength YS of 380 MPa or more, minimum required toughness for a linepipe as indicated by a vTrs of −60° C. or lower, and excellent HIC resistance as indicated by a hardness ratio of less than 1.20. On the other hand, the comparative examples, which were out of the range according to embodiments, did not achieve the desired properties for a hot-rolled steel sheet for a high strength electric resistance welded steel pipe excellent in terms of HIC resistance, because the desired toughness was not achieved, or because there was a deterioration in HIC resistance.

Claims
  • 1. A hot-rolled steel sheet for a high strength linepipe, the steel sheet having a metallic structure composed of bainitic-ferrite and having a chemical composition comprising: C: 0.02% or more and 0.06% or less, by mass %;Si: 0.05% or more and 0.25% or less, by mass %;Mn: 0.60% or more and 1.10% or less, by mass %;P: 0.008% or less, by mass %;S: 0.0010% or less, by mass %;Nb: 0.010% or more and 0.060% or less, by mass %;Ti: 0.001% or more and 0.020% or less, by mass %;Mo: 0.05% or less, by mass %;Cr: 0.05% or more and 0.50% or less, by mass %;Al: 0.01% or more and 0.08% or less, by mass %;Ca: 0.0005% or more and 0.0050% or less, by mass %;O: 0.005% or less, by mass %;one or more selected from the group consisting of Cu: 0.50% or less, by mass % Ni: 0.50% or less, by mass %, and V: 0.10% or less, by mass %; andremaining Fe and unavoidable impurities as a balance,wherein expression (1) below is satisfied: SP≦1.90  (1),where SP is calculated from SP=Mn+Mo+11.3×C+0.29×(Cu+Ni)+0.60×Cr+0.88×V, and where atomic symbols in the equation respectively represent the contents of the corresponding chemical elements by mass %,and a ratio of the hardness of a center segregation part to the hardness of a non-segregation part is less than 1.20.
  • 2. The hot-rolled steel sheet for a high strength linepipe according to claim 1, wherein the steel sheet has a yield strength in the range of 435 MPa to 534 MPa.
  • 3. The hot-rolled steel sheet for a high strength linepipe according to claim 1, wherein the steel sheet has a tensile strength in the range of 508 MPa to 616 MPa.
  • 4. The hot-rolled steel sheet for a high strength linepipe according to claim 1, wherein the steel sheet has a fracture transition temperature in the range of −70° C. or less.
  • 5. A method for manufacturing a hot-rolled steel sheet for a high strength linepipe, the method comprising: heating a steel slab having the chemical composition according to claim 1 at a temperature in the range of 1100° C. to 1300° C.;rough rolling on the steel slab;then finish rolling the rough-rolled steel slab to generate a finish-rolled steel sheet under conditions that a cumulative rolling reduction ratio is in the range of 20% or more in a temperature in the range of 930° C. or less;cooling on the finish-rolled steel sheet to a temperature in the range of 380° C. to 600° C. at an average cooling rate in the range of 5° C./s to 100° C./s in terms of a temperature of a central part of the finish-rolled steel sheet in a thickness direction; andcoiling the cooled finish-rolled steel sheet into a coil shape,wherein the steel sheet has a metallic structure composed of bainitic-ferrite.
Priority Claims (1)
Number Date Country Kind
2013-010976 Jan 2013 JP national
PCT Information
Filing Document Filing Date Country Kind
PCT/JP2014/000320 1/23/2014 WO 00