HOT-STAMPING FORMED BODY

Abstract
A hot-stamping formed body has a predetermined chemical composition and includes microstructure which includes residual austenite of which an area ratio is in a range of 20% to 30%. Among grain boundaries of crystal grains of bainite and tempered martensite in the microstructure, a ratio of a length of a grain boundary having a rotation angle in a range of 55° to 75° to a total length of a grain boundary having a rotation angle in a range of 4° to 12°, a grain boundary having a rotation angle in a range of 49° to 54°, and a grain boundary having a rotation angle in a range of 55° to 75° to the <011> direction as a rotation axis is 30% or more.
Description
TECHNICAL FIELD OF THE INVENTION

The present invention relates to a hot-stamping formed body. Priority is claimed on Japanese Patent Application No. 2020-002409, filed Jan. 9, 2020, the content of which is incorporated herein by reference.


BACKGROUND ART

In recent years, there has been a demand for a reduction in the weight of the vehicle body of a vehicle in terms of environmental protection and resource saving, and a high-strength steel sheet has been applied to vehicle members. Vehicle members are manufactured by press forming, but not only a forming load is increased but also the formability deteriorates as the strength of a steel sheet is increased. For this reason, the formability of a high-strength steel sheet into a member having a complicated shape becomes an issue. In order to solve this issue, the application of hot stamping technology in which press forming is performed after a steel sheet is heated up to a high temperature of an austenite range where the steel sheet softens is in progress. Hot stamping is attracting attention as technology that achieves both the formability of a steel sheet into a vehicle member and the strength of a vehicle member by performing the hardening of the steel sheet in a die at the same time as press working.


In order to obtain a higher effect of reducing the weight of a vehicle body from a vehicle member into which a steel sheet is formed by hot stamping, it is necessary to obtain a member that has high strength and is also excellent in hydrogen embrittlement resistance.


Patent Document 1 discloses a hot-dip galvanized steel sheet and a hot-dip galvannealed steel sheet that are stabilized by the concentration of C and Mn and are improved in strength, uniform deformability, and local deformability by containing 10% by volume or more of residual austenite, and methods of manufacturing the hot-dip galvanized steel sheet and the hot-dip galvannealed steel sheet.


Patent Document 2 discloses a hot-dip galvannealed steel sheet that is improved in strength, uniform deformability, and local deformability by including residual austenite of 10% by volume or more and including high-temperature tempered martensite and low-temperature tempered martensite at predetermined volume percentages.


Patent Document 3 discloses a high-strength hot press-formed member that is improved in ductility and bendability by including composite structure as the structure of steel and controlling a ratio of each structure of the composite structure.


Hydrogen embrittlement resistance is not considered in Patent Documents 1 to 3.


PRIOR ART DOCUMENT
Patent Document

[Patent Document 1] Japanese Unexamined Patent Application, First Publication No. 2017-53001


[Patent Document 2] PCT International Publication No. WO2016/199922


[Patent Document 3] PCT International Publication No. WO2018/033960


DISCLOSURE OF THE INVENTION
Problems to be Solved by the Invention

An object of the present invention is to provide a hot-stamping formed body that is excellent in strength and hydrogen embrittlement resistance.


Means for Solving the Problem

The gist of the present invention is as follows.


[1] A hot-stamping formed body according to an aspect of the present invention includes, as a chemical composition, by mass %:


C: more than 0.50% and 1.00% or less;


Si: 0.50% to 3.00%;


Mn: more than 3.00% and 5.00% or less;


Al: 0.100% to 3.000%;


Co: 0.100% to 3.000%;


P: 0.100% or less;


S: 0.1000% or less;


N: 0.0100% or less;


Nb: 0% to 0.150%;


Ti: 0% to 0.150%;


Mo: 0% to 1.00%;


Cr: 0% to 1.00%;


Cu: 0% to 1.00%;


V: 0% to 1.00%;


W: 0% to 1.00%;


Ni: 0% to 3.00%;


Mg: 0% to 1.00%;


Zr: 0% to 1.00%;


Sb: 0% to 1.00%;


Ca: 0% to 0.10%;


REM: 0% to 0.30%;


B: 0% to 0.0100%; and


a remainder consisting of Fe and impurities; and


microstructure which includes residual austenite of which an area ratio is in a range of 20% to 30%, bainite and tempered martensite of which a total area ratio is in a range of 70% to 80%, and a remainder in microstructure of which an area ratio is less than 5%, among grain boundaries of crystal grains of the bainite and the tempered martensite, a ratio of a length of a grain boundary having a rotation angle in a range of 55° to 75° to a total length of a grain boundary having a rotation angle in a range of 4° to 12°, a grain boundary having a rotation angle in a range of 49° to 54°, and a grain boundary having a rotation angle in a range of 55° to 75° to the <011> direction as a rotation axis is 30% or more.


[2] The hot-stamping formed body according to [1] may further include, as the chemical composition, by mass %, one or two or more selected from the group consisting of:


Nb: 0.010% to 0.150%;


Ti: 0.010% to 0.150%;


Mo: 0.005% to 1.00%;


Cr: 0.005% to 1.00%;


Cu: 0.001% to 1.00%;


V: 0.0005% to 1.00%;


W: 0.001% to 1.00%;


Ni: 0.001% to 3.00%;


Mg: 0.001% to 1.00%;


Zr: 0.001% to 1.00%;


Sb: 0.001% to 1.00%;


Ca: 0.001% to 0.10%;


REM: 0.001% to 0.30%; and


B: 0.0005% to 0.0100%.


Effects of the Invention

According to the aspect of the present invention, it is possible to obtain a hot-stamping formed body that is excellent in strength and hydrogen embrittlement resistance.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS


FIG. 1 is a diagram showing a test piece that is used to evaluate the hydrogen embrittlement resistance of Example.





EMBODIMENTS OF THE INVENTION

The inventors have found that a hot-stamping formed body can be improved in hydrogen embrittlement resistance while ensuring high strength in a case where the microstructure of the hot-stamping formed body includes predetermined amounts of residual austenite and bainite and tempered martensite and a ratio of a length of a grain boundary (high angle boundary) having a rotation angle in a range of 55° to 75° to a total length of a grain boundary having a rotation angle in a range of 4° to 12°, a grain boundary having a rotation angle in a range of 49° to 54°, and a grain boundary (hereinafter, referred to as a high angle boundary) having a rotation angle in a range of 55° to 75° among grain boundaries of crystal grains of the bainite and the tempered martensite to the <011> direction as a rotation axis is set to 30% or more.


A high angle boundary is a grain boundary that has the highest angle among grain boundaries included in the crystal grains of bainite and tempered martensite. When austenite is transformed into bainite or martensite, strain associated with the transformation is generated. In a case where austenite before the transformation has high hardness or a case where prior austenite grains cannot be easily deformed, a high angle boundary, which is highly effective in relieving strain, is likely to be formed. The inventors have found that by holding the steel in a low temperature range after hot stamping, prior austenite grains are made to have high hardness, and then the prior austenite can be transformed into bainite or martensite, and many high angle boundaries can be formed.


A hot-stamping formed body according to this embodiment will be described in detail below. First, the reason why the chemical composition of the hot-stamping formed body according to this embodiment is to be limited will be described.


A limited numerical range described using “to” to be described below includes a lower limit and an upper limit. Numerical values represented using “less than” or “exceed” are not included in a numerical range. All percentages (%) related to the chemical composition mean mass %.


The hot-stamping formed body according to this embodiment includes, as a chemical composition, by mass %, C exceeding 0.50% and being 1.00% or less, 0.50% to 3.00% of Si, Mn exceeding 3.00% and being 5.00% or less, 0.100% to 3.000% of Al, 0.100% to 3.000% of Co, 0.100% or less of P, 0.1000% or less of S, 0.0100% or less of N, and a remainder consisting of Fe and impurities. Each element will be described in detail below.


“C: more than 0.50% and 1.00% or less”


C is an element that improves the strength of the hot-stamping formed body. Further, C is also an element that stabilizes residual austenite. In a case where the C content is 0.50% or less, the desired strength of the hot-stamping formed body cannot be obtained. For this reason, the C content is set to exceed 0.50%. It is preferable that the C content is 0.52% or more or 0.54% or more. On the other hand, in a case where the C content exceeds 1.00%, steel is embrittled. For this reason, the C content is set to 1.00% or less. It is preferable that the C content is 0.90% or less, 0.80% or less, or 0.70% or less.


“Si: 0.50% to 3.00%”


Si is an element that stabilizes residual austenite. In a case where the Si content is less than 0.50%, the above-mentioned effects are not obtained and the stabilization of residual austenite is insufficient. As a result, a desired amount of residual austenite cannot be obtained. For this reason, the Si content is set to 0.50% or more. The Si content is preferably 1.00% or more or 1.10% or more. On the other hand, in a case where the Si content exceeds 3.00%, the amount of ferrite is increased. As a result, a desired microstructure is not obtained. For this reason, the Si content is set to 3.00% or less. The Si content is preferably 2.50% or less or 2.00% or less.


“Mn: more than 3.00% and 5.00% or less”


Mn is an element that facilitates bainitic transformation in a low temperature range by lowering an Ms point. In a case where the Mn content is 3.00% or less, a desired number of high angle boundaries cannot be obtained. For this reason, the Mn content is set to exceed 3.00%. The Mn content is preferably 3.10% or more or 3.20% or more. On the other hand, in a case where the Mn content exceeds 5.00%, early fracture is likely to occur. For this reason, the Mn content is set to 5.00% or less. The Mn content is preferably 4.00% or less.


“Al: 0.100% to 3.000%”


Al is an element that improves deformability by deoxidizing molten steel to suppress the formation of oxide serving as the origin of fracture. In a case where the Al content is less than 0.100%, deoxidation is not sufficiently performed and coarse oxide is generated. As a result, the above-mentioned effects are not obtained. For this reason, the Al content is set to 0.100% or more. The Al content is preferably 0.200% or more or 0.300% or more. On the other hand, in a case where the Al content exceeds 3.000%, coarse oxide is generated in steel. For this reason, the Al content is set to 3.000% or less. The Al content is preferably 2.000% or less, 1.500% or less, or 1.000% or less.


“Co: 0.100% to 3.000%”


Co is an element that facilitates bainitic transformation in a low temperature range by lowering an Ms point. In a case where the Co content is less than 0.100%, a desired amount of bainite cannot be obtained. For this reason, the Co content is set to 0.100% or more. It is preferable that the Co content is 0.110% or more or 0.120% or more. On the other hand, in a case where the Co content exceeds 3.000%, early fracture is likely to occur. For this reason, the Co content is set to 3.000% or less. It is preferable that the Co content is 2.000% or less, 1.500% or less, 1.000% or less, 0.500% or less, or 0.200% or less.


“P: 0.100% or less”


P is an impurity element and serves as the origin of fracture by being segregated at a grain boundary. For this reason, the P content is set to 0.100% or less. The P content is preferably 0.050% or less or 0.020% or less. The lower limit of the P content is not particularly limited. However, in a case where the lower limit of the P content is reduced to less than 0.0001%, cost required to remove P is significantly increased, which is not preferable economically. For this reason, 0.0001% may be set as the lower limit of the P content in actual operation.


“S: 0.1000% or less”


S is an impurity element and forms an inclusion in steel. Since this inclusion serves as the origin of fracture, the S content is set to 0.1000% or less. The S content is preferably 0.0500% or less, 0.0100% or less, or 0.0050% or less. The lower limit of the S content is not particularly limited. However, in a case where the lower limit of the S content is reduced to less than 0.0001%, cost required to remove S is significantly increased, which is not preferable economically. For this reason, 0.0001% may be set as the lower limit of the S content in actual operation.


“N: 0.0100% or less”


N is an impurity element and forms nitride in steel. Since this nitride serves as the origin of fracture, the N content is set to 0.0100% or less. The N content is preferably 0.0060% or less or 0.0050% or less. The lower limit of the N content is not particularly limited. However, in a case where the lower limit of the N content is reduced to be less than 0.0001%, cost required to remove N is significantly increased, which is not preferable economically. For this reason, 0.0001% may be set as the lower limit of the N content in actual operation.


The remainder of the chemical composition of the hot-stamping formed body according to this embodiment may be Fe and impurities. Elements, which are unavoidably mixed from a steel raw material or scrap and/or during the manufacture of steel and are allowed in a range where the characteristics of the hot-stamping formed body according to this embodiment do not deteriorate, are exemplified as the impurities.


The hot-stamping formed body according to this embodiment may contain the following elements as arbitrary elements instead of a part of Fe. The contents of the following arbitrary elements, which are obtained in a case where the following arbitrary elements are not contained, are 0%.


“Nb: 0% to 0.150%”


“Ti: 0% to 0.150%”


Nb and Ti increase the ratio of a high angle boundary by refining prior austenite grains in heating before hot stamping and suppressing the deformation of prior austenite in a case where austenite is transformed into bainite or martensite. In order to reliably exert this effect, it is preferable that the content of any one of Nb and Ti is set to 0.010% or more. On the other hand, since this effect is saturated even though the content of any one of Nb and Ti exceeds 0.150%, it is preferable that each of the Nb content and the Ti content is set to 0.150% or less.


“Mo: 0% to 1.00%”


“Cr: 0% to 1.00%”


“Cu: 0% to 1.00%”


“V: 0% to 1.00%”


“W: 0% to 1.00%”


“Ni: 0% to 3.00%”


Mo, Cr, Cu, V, W, and Ni have a function to increase the strength of the hot-stamping formed body by being dissolved in prior austenite grains in the heating before hot stamping. Accordingly, it is possible to increase the ratio of a high angle boundary by suppressing the deformation of the prior austenite grains in a case where austenite is transformed into bainite or martensite. In order to reliably obtain this effect, it is preferable that any one or more of 0.005% or more of Mo, 0.005% or more of Cr, 0.001% or more of Cu, 0.0005% or more of V, 0.001% or more of W, and 0.001% or more of Ni are contained. On the other hand, since the effect is saturated even though a large amount of these elements is contained, it is preferable that each of the Mo content, the Cr content, the Cu content, the V content, and the W content is set to 1.00% or less and the Ni content is set to 3.00% or less.


“Mg: 0% to 1.00%”


“Zr: 0% to 1.00%”


“Sb: 0% to 1.00%”


“Ca: 0% to 0.10%”


“REM: 0% to 0.30%”


Mg, Zr, Sb, Ca, and REM improve deformability by suppressing the formation of oxide serving as the origin of fracture. In order to reliably obtain this effect, it is preferable that the content of even one of Mg, Zr, Sb, Ca, and REM is set to 0.001% or more. On the other hand, since the effect is saturated even though a large amount of these elements is contained, it is preferable that the Mg content, the Zr content, and the Sb content are set to 1.00% or less, the Ca content is set to 0.10% or less, and the REM content is set to 0.30% or less.


In this embodiment, REM refers to a total of 17 elements that are composed of Sc, Y, and lanthanoid and the REM content refers to the total content of these elements.


“B: 0% to 0.0100%”


B is an element that is segregated at a prior austenite grain boundary and suppresses the formation of ferrite and pearlite. In order to reliably exert this effect, it is preferable that the B content is set to 0.0005% or more. On the other hand, since the effect is saturated even though the B content exceeds 0.0100%, it is preferable that the B content is set to 0.0100% or less.


The chemical composition of the above-mentioned hot-stamping formed body may be measured by a general analysis method. For example, the chemical composition of the above-mentioned hot-stamping formed body may be measured using inductively coupled plasma-atomic emission spectrometry (ICP-AES). C and S may be measured using a combustion-infrared absorption method and N may be measured using an inert gas fusion-thermal conductivity method. In a case where a plating layer is provided on the surface of the hot-stamping formed body, the chemical composition may be analyzed after the plating layer is removed by mechanical grinding.


Next, the microstructure of the hot-stamping formed body according to this embodiment will be described.


The hot-stamping formed body according to this embodiment includes microstructure which includes residual austenite of which the area ratio is in the range of 20% to 30%, bainite and tempered martensite of which the total area ratio is in the range of 70% to 80%, and a remainder in microstructure of which the area ratio is less than 5% and in which a ratio of the length of a grain boundary having a rotation angle in the range of 55° to 75° to the total length of a grain boundary having a rotation angle in the range of 4° to 12°, a grain boundary having a rotation angle in the range of 49° to 54°, and a grain boundary (high angle boundary) having a rotation angle in the range of 55° to 75° among grain boundaries of crystal grains of the bainite and the tempered martensite to the <011> direction as a rotation axis is 30% or more.


In this embodiment, microstructure at a depth position corresponding to ¼ of a sheet thickness from the surface of the hot-stamping formed body (a region between a depth corresponding to ⅛ of the sheet thickness from the surface and a depth corresponding to ⅜ of the sheet thickness from the surface) is specified. This depth position is an intermediate point between the surface of the hot-stamping formed body and a central position of the sheet thickness, and microstructure at the depth position typifies the steel structure of the hot-stamping formed body (shows the average microstructure of the entire hot-stamping formed body).


“Residual austenite of which the area ratio is in the range of 20% to 30%”


Residual austenite improves hydrogen embrittlement resistance in the hot-stamping formed body. In a case where the area ratio of residual austenite is less than 20%, desired hydrogen embrittlement resistance cannot be obtained. For this reason, the area ratio of residual austenite is set to 20% or more. The area ratio of residual austenite is preferably 22% or more. On the other hand, in a case where the area ratio of residual austenite exceeds 30%, desired strength cannot be obtained. For this reason, the area ratio of residual austenite is set to 30% or less. The area ratio of residual austenite is preferably 27% or less.


“Bainite and tempered martensite of which the total area ratio is in the range of 70% to 80%”


In a case where a desired amount of bainite and tempered martensite is contained, the hydrogen embrittlement resistance of the hot-stamping formed body is improved. In a case where the total area ratio of bainite and tempered martensite is less than 70% or exceeds 80%, desired hydrogen embrittlement resistance cannot be obtained. For this reason, the total area ratio of bainite and tempered martensite is set in the range of 70% to 80%. The lower limit of the total area ratio of bainite and tempered martensite is preferably 72% or more. Further, the upper limit thereof is preferably 77% or less.


“A remainder in microstructure of which the area ratio is less than 5%”


Fresh martensite, ferrite, pearlite, and granular bainite may be included in the microstructure of the hot-stamping formed body according to this embodiment as the remainder in microstructure. In a case where the area ratio of the remainder in microstructure is high, desired strength and desired hydrogen embrittlement resistance cannot be obtained. For this reason, the area ratio of the remainder in microstructure is set to be less than 5%. The area ratio of the remainder in microstructure is preferably 4% or less, 3% or less, 2% or less, or 1% or less.


“Measurement of the area ratios of residual austenite and bainite and tempered martensite”


A sample is cut out from an arbitrary position away from an end surface of the hot-stamping formed body by a distance of 50 mm or more (a position that avoids an end portion in a case where the sample cannot be collected at this position) so that a cross section (sheet thickness-cross section) perpendicular to the surface can be observed. The size of the sample also depends on a measurement device but is set to a size that can be observed by about 10 mm in a rolling direction.


After being polished using silicon carbide paper having a grit of #600 to #1500, the cross section of the sample is finished as a mirror surface using liquid in which diamond powder having a grain size in the range of 1 μm to 6 μm is dispersed in diluted solution of alcohol or the like or pure water. Then, the sample is polished for 8 minutes using colloidal silica not containing alkaline solution at a room temperature, so that strain introduced into the surface layer of the sample is removed. A region, which has a length of 50 μm and is present between a depth corresponding to ⅛ of the sheet thickness from the surface and a depth corresponding to ⅜ of the sheet thickness from the surface, is measured at a measurement interval of 0.1 μm at an arbitrary position on the cross section of the sample in a longitudinal direction by an electron backscatter diffraction method, so that crystal orientation information is obtained. An EBSD device formed of a schottky emission scanning electron microscope (JSM-7001F manufactured by JEOL Ltd.) and an EBSD detector (DVC5 detector manufactured by TSL Solutions) is used for measurement. In this case, the degree of vacuum in the EBSD device is set to 9.6×10−5 Pa or less, an accelerating voltage is set to 15 kV, an irradiation current level is set to 13, and the irradiation level of an electron beam is set to 62.


The area ratio of residual austenite is calculated from the obtained crystal orientation information using “Phase Map” function of software “OIM Analysis (registered trademark)” included in an EBSD analysis device. A region where a crystal structure is fcc is determined as residual austenite.


Next, regions where a crystal structure is bcc are determined as bainite, tempered martensite, fresh martensite, granular bainite, and ferrite; regions where a grain average image quality value is less than 60000 in these regions are determined as bainite, tempered martensite, and fresh martensite using “Grain Average Misorientation” function of software “OIM Analysis (registered trademark)” included in the EBSD analysis device; and the sum of the area ratios of these regions is calculated, so that the total area ratio of “bainite, tempered martensite, and fresh martensite” is obtained. The area ratio of fresh martensite, which is obtained by a method to be described later, is subtracted from the total area ratio of “bainite, tempered martensite, and fresh martensite” obtained by the above-mentioned method, so that the total area ratio of “bainite and tempered martensite” is obtained.


“Measurement of the Area Ratio of a Remainder in Microstructure”


A sample is cut out from an arbitrary position away from an end surface of the hot-stamping formed body by a distance of 50 mm or more (a position that avoids an end portion in a case where the sample cannot be collected at this position) so that a cross section (sheet thickness-cross section) perpendicular to the surface can be observed. The size of the sample also depends on a measurement device but is set to a size that can be observed by about 10 mm in a rolling direction.


After being polished using silicon carbide paper having a grit of #600 to #1500, the cross section of the sample is finished as a mirror surface using liquid in which diamond powder having a grain size in the range of 1 μm to 6 μm is dispersed in diluted solution of alcohol or the like or pure water and Nital etching is performed. Then, photographs having a plurality of visual fields are taken using a schottky emission scanning electron microscope (JSM-7001F manufactured by JEOL Ltd.) in a region that has a length of 50 μm and is present between a depth corresponding to ⅛ of the sheet thickness from the surface and a depth corresponding to ⅜ of the sheet thickness from the surface at an arbitrary position on the cross section of the sample in a longitudinal direction. Evenly spaced grids are drawn in the taken photographs, and structures at grid points are identified. The number of grid points corresponding to each structure is obtained and is divided by the total number of grid points, so that the area ratio of each structure is obtained. The area ratio can be more accurately obtained as the total number of grid points is larger. In this embodiment, grid spacings are set to 2 μm×2 μm and the total number of grid points is set to 1500.


A region where cementite is precipitated in a lamellar shape in the grains is determined as pearlite. A region where luminance is low and a substructure is not recognized is determined as ferrite. Regions where luminance is high and a substructure does not appear after etching are determined as fresh martensite and residual austenite. Regions not corresponding to any of the above-mentioned region are determined as granular bainite. The area ratio of residual austenite obtained by the above-mentioned EBSD analysis is subtracted from the area ratio of fresh martensite and residual austenite obtained from the taken photographs, so that the area ratio of fresh martensite is obtained.


“A ratio of the length of a grain boundary (high angle boundary) having a rotation angle in the range of 55° to 75° to the total length of a grain boundary having a rotation angle in the range of 4° to 12°, a grain boundary having a rotation angle in the range of 49° to 54°, and a grain boundary having a rotation angle in the range of 55° to 75° among grain boundaries of crystal grains of bainite and tempered martensite to the <011> direction as a rotation axis is 30% or more”


A high angle boundary is a grain boundary that has the highest angle among grain boundaries included in the crystal grains of bainite and tempered martensite. A high angle boundary is highly effective in suppressing the propagation of cracks caused by hydrogen. In a case where a ratio of the length of a high angle boundary is less than 30%, desired hydrogen embrittlement resistance cannot be obtained in the hot-stamping formed body. For this reason, a ratio of the length of a high angle boundary is set to 30% or more. A ratio of the length of a high angle boundary is preferably 35% or more or 40% or more. The upper limit of a ratio of the length of a high angle boundary is not particularly specified. However, according to the chemical composition and a manufacturing method according to this embodiment, a substantial upper limit thereof is 90%.


“Method of Measuring a Ratio of the Length of a High Angle Boundary”


A sample is cut out from a position away from the end surface of the hot-stamping formed body by a distance of 50 mm or more (a position that avoids the end portion in a case where the sample cannot be collected at this position) so that a cross section (sheet thickness-cross section) perpendicular to the surface can be observed. The sample also depends on a measurement device but is set to have a length that can be observed by about 10 mm in a rolling direction. A depth position of the cut-out sample corresponding to ¼ of a sheet thickness (a region between a depth corresponding to ⅛ of the sheet thickness from the surface and a depth corresponding to ⅜ of the sheet thickness from the surface) is subjected to EBSD analysis at a measurement interval of 0.1 μm, so that crystal orientation information is obtained. Here, the EBSD analysis is performed using an EBSD device formed of a schottky emission scanning electron microscope (JSM-7001F manufactured by JEOL Ltd.) and an EBSD detector (DVCS detector manufactured by TSL Solutions) in a state where the irradiation level of an electron beam is 62.


Next, regions where a grain average image quality value is less than 60000 are determined as the crystal grains of bainite, tempered martensite, and fresh martensite with regard to the obtained crystal orientation information using “Grain Average Image Quality” function of software “OIM Analysis (registered trademark)” included in the EBSD analysis device; the length of a grain boundary having a rotation angle in the range of 4° to 12°, the length of a grain boundary having a rotation angle in the range of 49° to 54°, and the length of a grain boundary having a rotation angle in the range of 55° to 75° to the <011> direction as a rotation axis are calculated with regard to the grain boundaries of the crystal grains of bainite and tempered martensite among grain boundaries of these crystal grains; and a ratio of the length of a grain boundary having a rotation angle in the range of 55° to 75° to the value of the sum of the lengths of the respective grain boundaries is calculated. Accordingly, a ratio of the length of the grain boundary (high angle boundary) having a rotation angle in the range of 55° to 75° to the total length of the grain boundary having a rotation angle in the range of 4° to 12°, the grain boundary having a rotation angle in the range of 49° to 54°, and the grain boundary (high angle boundary) having a rotation angle in the range of 55° to 75° among the crystal grains of bainite and tempered martensite to the <011> direction as a rotation axis is obtained.


Taken photographs may be obtained by the same method as a method of measuring the area ratio of the remainder in microstructure; fresh martensite may be determined from the crystal grains of bainite, tempered martensite, and fresh martensite; and fresh martensite may be excluded from the crystal grains of bainite, tempered martensite, and fresh martensite. The reason why the grain boundaries of the crystal grains of fresh martensite are not included in the measurement of a high angle boundary is that fresh martensite has high hardness and serves as the origin of fracture.


The length of the grain boundary can be easily calculated in a case where, for example, “Inverse Pole Figure Map” function and “Axis Angle” function of software “OIM Analysis (registered trademark)” included in the EBSD analysis device are used. In these functions, among grain boundaries of crystal grains of the bainite and the tempered martensite, the total length of the grain boundaries can be calculated in a case where specific rotation angles are specified to an arbitrary direction as a rotation axis. The above-mentioned analysis may be performed over all crystal grains included in a measurement region, and the lengths of the above-mentioned three types of grain boundaries among the grain boundaries of the crystal grains of bainite and tempered martensite to the <011> direction as a rotation axis may be calculated.


“Average Dislocation Density: 4.0×1015 m/m2 or More”


The average dislocation density of the hot-stamping formed body according to this embodiment may be 4.0×1015 m/m2 or more. In a case where the hot-stamping formed body has the above-mentioned chemical composition and includes the above-mentioned microstructure, that is, residual austenite of which the area ratio is in the range of 20% to 30%, bainite and tempered martensite of which the total area ratio is in the range of 70% to 80%, and a remainder in microstructure of which the area ratio is less than 5% and in which a ratio of the length of a grain boundary having a rotation angle in the range of 55° to 75° to the total length of a grain boundary having a rotation angle in the range of 4° to 12°, a grain boundary having a rotation angle in the range of 49° to 54°, and a grain boundary having a rotation angle in the range of 55° to 75° among grain boundaries of crystal grains of the bainite and the tempered martensite to the <011> direction as a rotation axis is 30% or more, the average dislocation density of the hot-stamping formed body may be 4.0×1015 m/m2 or more.


“Measurement of Average Dislocation Density”


A sample is cut out from an arbitrary position away from an end surface of the hot-stamping formed body by a distance of 50 mm or more (a position that avoids an end portion in a case where the sample cannot be collected at this position). The size of the sample also depends on a measurement device but is set to a size that corresponds to about 20 mm square. The thickness of the sample is reduced using a mixed solution that is composed of 48% by volume of distilled water, 48% by volume of hydrogen peroxide solution, and 4% by volume of hydrofluoric acid. In this case, the same thickness is reduced from each of the surface and back of the sample, so that a depth position corresponding to ¼ of the sheet thickness (a region between a depth corresponding to ⅛ of the sheet thickness from the surface and a depth corresponding to ⅜ of the sheet thickness from the surface) is exposed from the surface of the sample not depressurized. X-ray diffraction measurement is performed on this exposed surface to specify a plurality of diffraction peaks of a body-centered cubic lattice. An average dislocation density is analyzed from the half-widths of these diffraction peaks, so that the average dislocation density of a surface layer region is obtained. A modified Williamson-Hall method disclosed in “T. Ungar, three others, Journal of Applied Crystallography, 1999, Vol. 32, pp. 992 to 1002” is used as an analysis method.


“Lath Width of Crystal Grains Having Body-Centered Structure: 200 nm or Less”


The lath width of crystal grains, which have body-centered structure, of the hot-stamping formed body according to this embodiment may be 200 nm or less. In a case where the hot-stamping formed body has the above-mentioned chemical composition and includes the above-mentioned microstructure, that is, residual austenite of which the area ratio is in the range of 20% to 30%, bainite and tempered martensite of which the total area ratio is in the range of 70% to 80%, and a remainder in microstructure of which the area ratio is less than 5%, among grain boundaries of crystal grains of the bainite and the tempered martensite, a ratio of the length of a grain boundary having a rotation angle in the range of 55° to 75° to the total length of a grain boundary having a rotation angle in the range of 4° to 12°, a grain boundary having a rotation angle in the range of 49° to 54°, and a grain boundary having a rotation angle in the range of 55° to 75° to the <011> direction as a rotation axis is 30% or more, the lath width of crystal grains having body-centered structure is inevitability 200 nm or less.


In a case where the lath width of crystal grains having body-centered structure is 200 nm or less, an effect of refining crystal grains is obtained. Accordingly, desired tensile strength can be obtained. Preferably, the lath width is 180 nm or less. Since it is more preferable as the lath width is smaller, the lower limit of the lath width is not particularly specified.


“Measurement of Lath Width of Crystal Grains Having Body-Centered Structure”


A sample is cut out from a position away from the end surface of the hot-stamping formed body by a distance of 50 mm or more (a position that avoids the end portion in a case where the sample cannot be collected at this position) so that a cross section (sheet thickness-cross section) perpendicular to the surface can be observed. The sample also depends on a measurement device but is set to have a length that can be observed by about 10 mm in a rolling direction. A depth position of the cut-out sample corresponding to ¼ of a sheet thickness (a region between a depth corresponding to ⅛ of the sheet thickness from the surface and a depth corresponding to ⅜ of the sheet thickness from the surface) is subjected to EBSD analysis at a measurement interval of 0.1 μm, that crystal orientation information is obtained. Here, the EBSD analysis is performed using an EBSD device formed of a schottky emission scanning electron microscope (JSM-7001F manufactured by JEOL Ltd.) and an EBSD detector (DVC5 detector manufactured by TSL Solutions) in a state where the irradiation level of an electron beam is 62.


Next, an Invere Pole Figure image of only crystal grains having body-centered structure is drawn with regard to the obtained crystal orientation information using “Invere Pole Figure” function of software “OIM Analysis (registered trademark)” included in the EBSD analysis device, crystal grains of which a difference in crystal orientation is 8° or less is regarded as one lath (generally, called a block but expressed as a lath in this embodiment), and the length of the lath in a minor axis direction is measured. The lengths of 20 or more laths in the minor axis direction are measured and an average value of the lengths is calculated, so that the lath width of the crystal grains having body-centered structure is obtained.


“Sheet Thickness and Tensile Strength”


The sheet thickness of the hot-stamping formed body according to this embodiment is not particularly limited. However, in terms of reducing the weight of a vehicle body, it is preferable that the sheet thickness of the hot-stamping formed body according to this embodiment is set in the range of 0.5 mm to 3.5 mm. Further, in terms of reducing the weight of a vehicle body, it is preferable that the tensile strength of the hot-stamping formed body is set to 1500 MPa or more. More preferably, the tensile strength of the hot-stamping formed body is 1800 MPa or more or 2000 MPa or more. The upper limit of the tensile strength is not particularly specified, but may be set to 2600 MPa or less.


“Plating Layer”


For the purpose of improving corrosion resistance and the like, a plating layer may be formed on the surface of the hot-stamping formed body according to this embodiment. The plating layer may be any of an electroplating layer and a hot-dip plating layer. The electroplating layer includes, for example, an electrogalvanized layer, an electrolytic Zn-N—alloy plating layer, and the like. The hot-dip plating layer includes, for example, a hot-dip galvanized layer, a hot-dip galvannealed layer, a hot-dip aluminum plating layer, a hot-dip Zn—Al alloy plating layer, a hot-dip Zn—Al—Mg alloy plating layer, a hot-dip Zn—Al—Mg—Si alloy plating layer, and the like. The adhesion amount of a plating layer is not particularly limited and may be a general adhesion amount.


“Method of Manufacturing a Hot-Stamping Formed Body”


Next, a preferred method of manufacturing the hot-stamping formed body according to this embodiment will be described.


The hot-stamping formed body according to this embodiment can be manufactured by performing hot stamping on a cold-rolled steel sheet manufactured by a routine method or a cold-rolled steel sheet including a plating layer on the surface thereof, holding the cold-rolled steel sheet in a low temperature range after the hot stamping, and then cooling the cold-rolled steel sheet.


“Heating and Holding Before Hot Stamping”


It is preferable that the cold-rolled steel sheet is held for 60 sec to 600 sec in the temperature range of 800° C. to 1000° C. before the hot stamping. In a case where a heating temperature is lower than 800° C. or a holding time is less than 60 sec, the cold-rolled steel sheet cannot be sufficiently austenitized. For this reason, a desired amount of bainite and tempered martensite may not be capable of being obtained in the hot-stamping formed body. In a case where a heating temperature exceeds 1000° C. or a holding time exceeds 600 sec, transformation into bainite and tempered martensite is delayed due to an increase in austenite grain size. For this reason, a desired amount of bainite and tempered martensite may not be capable of being obtained.


An average heating rate during the heating may be set to 0.1° C./s or more or 200° C./s or less. An average heating rate mentioned here is a value that is obtained in a case where a temperature difference between the surface temperature of a steel sheet at the time of start of the heating and a holding temperature is divided by a time difference from the start of the heating to a time when a temperature reaches a holding temperature. Further, during the holding, the temperature of a steel sheet may be fluctuated in the temperature range of 800° C. to 1000° C. or may be constant.


Examples of a heating method before the hot stamping include heating using an electric furnace, a gas furnace, or the like, flame heating, energization heating, high-frequency heating, induction heating, and the like.


“Cooling After Hot Stamping”


Hot stamping is performed after the heating and the holding described above. After the hot stamping, it is preferable that cooling is performed at an average cooling rate of 1.0° C./s to 100° C./s up to the temperature range of 150° C. to 300° C. In a case where a cooling stop temperature is lower than 150° C. in the cooling after the hot stamping, the introduction of lattice defects is excessively facilitated. For this reason, desired dislocation density may not be capable of being obtained. In a case where a cooling stop temperature exceeds 300° C., the hardness of prior austenite grains is reduced. For this reason, a desired number of high angle boundaries may not be capable of being formed. Further, in a case where an average cooling rate is lower than 1.0° C./s, transformation into ferrite, granular bainite, or pearlite is facilitated. For this reason, a desired amount of bainite and tempered martensite may not be capable of being obtained. In a case where an average cooling rate exceeds 100° C./s, the driving force of transformation into tempered martensite and bainite is increased and an action for relieving strain to be introduced by transformation is reduced. For this reason, it is difficult to obtain a desired number of high angle boundaries. An average cooling rate mentioned here is a value of the difference in the surface temperatures between at the cooling start and at the cooling end divided by time difference between the cooling start and the cooling end.


“Holding at Low Temperature”


It is preferable that holding at low temperature is performed in the temperature range of 150° C. to 300° C. for a period exceeding 50 hours and equal to or shorter than 20 days. During the holding at low temperature carbon is distributed to untransformed austenite from martensite that is transformed from austenite. Austenite on which carbon is concentrated is not transformed into martensite and remains as residual austenite even after the finish of cooling after the holding at low temperature. Further, since austenite in which carbon is concentrated has high hardness in a case where holding at low temperature is performed under the above-mentioned conditions, the ratio of a high angle boundary can be increased.


In a case where a holding temperature is lower than 150° C. or a holding time is 50 hours or less, carbon is not sufficiently distributed to untransformed austenite from martensite. For this reason, a desired amount of residual austenite may not be capable of being obtained. Further, the ratio of a high angle boundary is reduced. In a case where a holding temperature exceeds 300° C., the hardness of prior austenite is reduced. For this reason, a desired number of high angle boundaries may not be capable of being obtained. Even though a holding time exceeds 20 days, the distribution behavior of carbon is saturated and desired microstructure cannot be obtained. For this reason, the upper limit of a holding time is set to 20 days. During the holding at low temperature, the temperature of a steel sheet may be fluctuated in the temperature range of 150° C. to 300° C. or may be constant.


The holding at low temperature is not particularly limited, but may be performed with a steel sheet after the hot stamping transported to a heating furnace.


In a case where the steel sheet is heated in the temperature range of 300° C. or more after hot stamping and cooling and before holding at low temperature, bainite is generated. As a result, a desired number of high angle boundaries cannot be obtained. For this reason, in a case where the hot-stamping formed body according to this embodiment is to be manufactured, it is not preferable that the steel sheet is heated in the temperature range of 300° C. or more after hot stamping and cooling and before holding at low temperature.


“Cooling After Holding at Low Temperature”


It is preferable that the steel sheet is cooled up to a temperature of 80° C. or less at an average cooling rate of 1.0° C./s to 100° C./s after the holding at low temperature. In a case where an average cooling rate is lower than 1.0° C./s or a cooling stop temperature exceeds 80° C., residual austenite may be decomposed. For this reason, a desired amount of residual austenite may not be capable of being obtained. In a case where an average cooling rate exceeds 100° C./s, a load is applied to a cooling device. An average cooling rate mentioned here is a value of the difference in the surface temperatures between at the time of start of the cooling after the holding at low temperature and at the time of end of the cooling divided by time difference between the cooling start and the cooling end.


EXAMPLES

Next, examples of the present invention will be described. Conditions in the examples are one condition example that is employed to confirm the feasibility and effects of the present invention, and the present invention is not limited to this condition example. The present invention may employ various conditions to achieve the object of the present invention without departing from the scope of the present invention.


Hot rolling and cold rolling were performed on steel pieces manufactured by the casting of molten steel having the chemical composition shown in Tables 1 and 2, and plating was performed on the steel pieces as necessary, so that cold-rolled steel sheets were obtained. Then, hot-stamping formed bodies shown in Tables 3 and 4 were manufactured using the cold-rolled steel sheets under conditions shown in Tables 3 and 4.


An average heating rate during heating before hot stamping was set to 0.1° C./s to 200° C./s, cooling after hot stamping was performed up to the temperature range of 150° C. to 300° C., and cooling after holding at low temperature was performed up to a temperature of 80° C. or less. Further, Manufacture No. 18 of Table 3 was provided with a hot-dip aluminum plating layer and Manufacture No. 19 was provided with a hot-dip galvanized layer.


Manufacture No. 57 was held for 30 sec in the temperature range of 300 to 560° after hot stamping and cooling and before holding at low temperature, and was then subjected to holding at low temperature shown in Table 4.


An underline in Tables represents that a condition is out of the range of the present invention, a condition is out of a preferred manufacturing condition, or a characteristic value is not preferred. yr in Tables 3 and 4 denotes residual austenite, B denotes bainite, and TM denotes tempered martensite.


With regard to the microstructure of the hot-stamping formed body, the measurement of the area ratio of each structure, the measurement of a ratio of the length of a high angle boundary, the measurement of dislocation density, and the measurement of the lath width of crystal grains having body-centered structure were performed by the above-mentioned measurement methods. Further, the mechanical characteristics of the hot-stamping formed body were evaluated by the following methods.


“Tensile Strength”


No. 5 test pieces described in JIS Z 2241:2011 were prepared from an arbitrary position of the hot-stamping formed body, and the tensile strength of the hot-stamping formed body was obtained according to a test method described in JIS Z 2241:2011. The speed of a cross-head was set to 3 mm/min. The test piece was determined to be acceptable since being excellent in strength in a case where tensile strength was 1500 MPa or more, and was determined to be unacceptable since being inferior in strength in a case where tensile strength was less than 1500 MPa.


“Hydrogen Embrittlement Resistance”


The hydrogen embrittlement resistance of the hot-stamping formed body was evaluated by the following method. The shape of a test piece used to evaluate hydrogen embrittlement resistance is shown in FIG. 1. A test piece of FIG. 1 provided with V-notches was immerged in an aqueous solution, in which 5 g/l of ammonium thiocyanate was dissolved in 3% by volume of saline solution, for 12 hours at a room temperature; and it was determined whether or not fracture occurs. The test piece was determined to be acceptable in a case where fracture did not occur even though the test piece was immerged for 12 hours or more; and was written as “Fair” in a case where fracture did not occur after 12 hours, was written as “Good” in a case where fracture did not occur after 18 hours, and was written as “Very Good” in a case where fracture did not occur after 24 hours in Tables 3 and 4. The test piece was determined to be unacceptable in a case where fracture occurred after 12 hours; and was written as “Bad” in Tables 3 and 4.


It is found from Tables 3 and 4 that a hot-stamping formed body of which the chemical composition and the microstructure are in the range of the present invention has excellent strength and hydrogen embrittlement resistance.


On the other hand, it is found that a hot-stamping formed body of which any one or more of the chemical composition and the microstructure is out of the present invention is inferior in one or more of strength and hydrogen embrittlement resistance.












TABLE 1







Steel
Chemical composition (mass %)
Remainder Fe and impurities


















No.
C
Si
Mn
Al
Co
P
S
N
Others
Note




















1
0.51
1.75
3.53
0.442
0.104
0.005
0.0020
0.0042

Steel of invention


2
0.87
1.02
3.35
0.315
0.105
0.007
0.0007
0.0050

Steel of invention


3
0.56
0.66
3.30
0.313
0.111
0.004
0.0021
0.0033

Steel of invention


4
0.53
2.89
3.37
0.536
0.112
0.006
0.0029
0.0052

Steel of invention


5
0.54
1.85
3.12
0.368
0.103
0.012
0.0020
0.0035

Steel of invention


6
0.56
0.95
4.78
0.507
0.126
0.007
0.0023
0.0036

Steel of invention


7
0.54
1.01
3.37
0.120
0.103
0.003
0.0028
0.0051

Steel of invention


8
0.54
1.83
3.29
2.780
0.110
0.009
0.0007
0.0040

Steel of invention


9
0.53
1.87
3.36
0.340
0.181
0.086
0.0019
0.0052

Steel of invention


10
0.54
1.08
3.17
0.402
2.781
0.087
0.0024
0.0035

Steel of invention


11
0.56
1.66
3.16
0.743
0.123
0.082
0.0021
0.0028

Steel of invention


12
0.55
1.64
3.38
0.673
0.112
0.001
0.0015
0.0047

Steel of invention


13
0.51
1.21
3.24
0.804
0.143
0.006
0.0781
0.0030

Steel of invention


14
0.51
1.07
3.26
0.622
0.112
0.006
0.0004
0.0051

Steel of invention


15
0.54
1.56
3.13
0.481
0.116
0.011
0.0016
0.0072

Steel of invention


16
0.54
1.22
3.34
0.427
0.128
0.003
0.0033
0.0003

Steel of invention


17
0.51
1.70
3.35
0.462
0.151
0.005
0.0025
0.0031

Steel of invention


18
0.56
1.47
3.26
0.436
0.122
0.005
0.0025
0.0034

Steel of invention


19
0.51
1.53
3.31
0.444
0.125
0.004
0.0024
0.0030

Steel of invention


20
0.54
1.77
3.19
0.502
0.127
0.009
0.0031
0.0045
Nb: 0.037
Steel of invention


21
0.53
1.16
3.45
0.784
0.142
0.004
0.0012
0.0032
Ti: 0.016
Steel of invention


22
0.55
1.03
3.21
0.403
0.113
0.009
0.0018
0.0053
Mo: 0.12
Steel of invention


23
0.51
1.54
3.40
0.662
0.154
0.011
0.0017
0.0031
Cr: 0.21
Steel of invention


24
0.55
1.76
3.26
0.754
0.147
0.012
0.0020
0.0044
Cu: 0.23
Steel of invention


25
0.55
1.55
3.33
0.331
0.149
0.005
0.0014
0.0033
V: 0.24
Steel of invention



















TABLE 2







Steel
Chemical composition (mass %)
Remainder Fe and impurities


















No.
C
Si
Mn
Al
Co
P
S
N
Others
Note




















26
0.51
1.61
3.16
0.416
0.140
0.005
0.0024
0.0030
W: 0.25
Steel of












invention


27
0.55
1.47
3.47
0.351
0.125
0.011
0.0028
0.0026
Ni: 0.29
Steel of












invention


28
0.53
1.41
3.33
0.452
0.149
0.009
0.0029
0.0037
Mg: 0.03
Steel of












invention


29
0.52
1.62
3.17
0.373
0.113
0.012
0.0024
0.0050
Zr: 0.02
Steel of












invention


30
0.52
1.69
3.14
0.563
0.112
0.005
0.0018
0.0045
Sb: 0.01
Steel of












invention


31
0.54
1.44
3.37
0.499
0.125
0.011
0.0026
0.0030
B: 0.0023
Steel of












invention


32
0.51
1.43
3.18
0.412
0.136
0.009
0.0028
0.0032
Ca: 0.02
Steel of












invention


33
0.54
1.22
3.50
0.421
0.124
0.009
0.0017
0.0035
REM: 0.13
Steel of












invention


34
0.35
1.11
3.38
0.777
0.135
0.008
0.0025
0.0043

Comparative












steel


35
1.10
1.53
3.47
0.492
0.118
0.005
0.0008
0.0028

Comparative












steel


36
0.56
0.24
3.49
0.732
0.108
0.010
0.0027
0.0041

Comparative












steel


37
0.55
3.30
3.16
0.596
0.150
0.010
0.0007
0.0046

Comparative












steel


38
0.51
1.11
2.88
0.312
0.129
0.005
0.0009
0.0046

Comparative












steel


39
0.56
1.59
5.19
0.413
0.100
0.005
0.0020
0.0043

Comparative












steel


40
0.53
1.21
3.45
0.070
0.129
0.011
0.0019
0.0045

Comparative












steel


41
0.55
1.07
3.16
3.220
0.107
0.006
0.0020
0.0050

Comparative












steel


42
0.52
1.35
3.37
0.320
0.060
0.006
0.0020
0.0046

Comparative












steel


43
0.53
1.10
3.27
0.460
3.223
0.006
0.0020
0.0049

Comparative












steel


44
0.54
1.83
3.30
0.606
0.143
0.212
0.0010
0.0050

Comparative












steel


45
0.53
1.11
3.38
0.462
0.105
0.008
0.1803
0.0030

Comparative












steel


46
0.51
1.11
3.48
0.460
0.117
0.007
0.0027
0.0213

Comparative












steel





An underline represents that a condition is out of the range of the present invention.



















TABLE 3










Cooling after HS

Cooling after



















Average cooling
Holding at low
holding at low
















Heating
rate until holding
temperature
temperature


















Heating
Holding
at low
Holding
Holding
Average
Microstructure


Manufacture
Steel
temperature
time
temperature
temperature
time
cooling rate
γr


No.
No.
(° C.)
(s)
(° C./s)
(° C.)
(h)
(° C./s)
(area %)





1
1
910
310
5
189
265
5
24


2
2
896
377
9
181
243
16
26


3
3
891
351
9
205
280
10
21


4
4
883
249
8
210
214
20
25


5
5
918
354
4
188
274
12
27


6
6
894
232
4
183
292
20
24


7
7
923
360
9
192
232
9
27


8
8
898
311
5
185
242
19
25


9
9
890
366
10
182
250
13
22


10
10
890
310
3
180
211
19
25


11
11
938
328
6
207
227
19
23


12
12
889
312
8
207
240
16
22


13
13
925
234
4
200
251
11
23


14
14
896
257
8
200
268
11
23


15
15
928
346
8
180
267
20
27


16
16
938
253
10
194
257
12
26


17
17
889
248
7
207
208
6
22


18
18
894
323
10
199
287
8
22


19
19
896
318
9
208
280
15
23


20
20
918
346
7
195
257
15
26


21
21
912
241
6
194
209
9
22


22
22
922
347
4
193
226
11
26


23
23
904
314
3
203
204
10
26


24
24
891
260
8
201
208
15
25


25
25
881
319
5
180
259
10
22


26
26
927
343
6
182
252
12
23


27
27
937
254
5
189
233
15
23


28
28
892
298
5
197
284
7
23


29
29
913
267
9
209
205
10
25


30
30
882
293
3
204
252
5
26















Microstructure




















Ratio of length of


Mechanical






grain boundary


characteristics



















having rotation angle
Dislocation

Tensile
Hydrogen



Manufacture
B + TM
Remainder
in range of 55° to 75°
density
Lath width
strength
embrittlement



No.
(area %)
(area %)
(%)
(1015 m/m2)
(nm)
(MPa)
resistance
Note





1
74
2
55
4.4
189
1530
Good
Example of invention


2
73
1
44
7.3
151
2509
Good
Example of invention


3
76
3
50
5.9
166
2149
Fair
Example of invention


4
71
4
49
6.3
180
2363
Fair
Example of invention


5
71
2
34
5.6
176
2427
Fair
Example of invention


6
72
4
40
6.4
165
2231
Fair
Example of invention


7
72
1
55
6.2
176
2401
Fair
Example of invention


8
71
4
40
4.9
171
2135
Fair
Example of invention


9
74
4
51
5.8
162
2275
Fair
Example of invention


10
73
2
49
5.6
163
2128
Fair
Example of invention


11
74
3
51
6.1
165
2130
Fair
Example of invention


12
74
4
47
6.1
187
2409
Very Good
Example of invention


13
73
4
51
6.2
171
2489
Fair
Example of invention


14
74
3
41
5.4
180
2396
Very Good
Example of invention


15
70
3
51
6.2
186
2125
Fair
Example of invention


16
70
4
52
5.4
175
2444
Very Good
Example of invention


17
75
3
47
4.6
186
2388
Very Good
Example of invention


18
75
3
51
4.8
176
2360
Very Good
Example of invention


19
73
4
51
4.5
164
2499
Very Good
Example of invention


20
70
4
43
6.0
161
2344
Very Good
Example of invention


21
76
2
40
6.4
170
2269
Very Good
Example of invention


22
70
4
41
6.3
165
2049
Very Good
Example of invention


23
70
4
50
6.2
178
2443
Very Good
Example of invention


24
72
3
53
4.9
161
2491
Very Good
Example of invention


25
76
2
52
4.7
174
2193
Very Good
Example of invention


26
75
2
46
6.4
184
2069
Very Good
Example of invention


27
73
4
56
4.9
190
2218
Very Good
Example of invention


28
76
1
43
4.7
161
2273
Very Good
Example of invention


29
71
4
46
6.1
162
2208
Very Good
Example of invention


30
72
2
52
5.1
173
2348
Very Good
Example of invention






















TABLE 4












Cooling after



















Cooling after HS
Holding at low
holding at low
















Heating
Average cooling
temperature
temperature


















Heating
Holding
rate until holding at
Holding
Holding
Average cooling
Microstructure


Manufacture
Steel
temperature
time
low temperature
temperature
time
rate
γr


No.
No.
(° C.)
(s)
(° C./s)
(° C.)
(h)
(° C./s)
(area %)





31
31
933
302
7
199
294
17
23


32
32
888
336
3
200
294
14
22


33
33
938
260
6
197
215
7
26


34
34
938
270
7
203
210
10
23


35
35
940
349
8
183
227
7
24


36
36
911
283
10
198
270
6
16


37
37
888
284
10
184
300
20
27


38
38
923
284
4
189
202
11
26


39
39
917
345
6
191
209
16
28


40
40
932
250
8
181
284
15
24


41
41
901
357
5
181
231
18
24


42
42
921
362
6
204
232
17
24


43
43
898
284
9
194
259
16
23


44
44
926
310
4
201
242
13
28


45
45
902
305
7
183
231
7
23


46
46
880
255
7
201
296
17
28


47
17
782
373
5
194
25
13
17


48
17
1084
381
11
202
28
18
20


49
17
911
45
6
194
25
11
19


50
17
931
124
11
207
30
6
19


51
17
941
251
0.5
209
31
19
19


52
17
889
277
111
203
22
20
19


53
17
909
336
8
133
24
9
20


54
17
933
282
6
320
22
20
18


55
17
923
326
6
208
491
7
17


56
17
940
344
5
204
1.5
10
7


 57*
17
918
292
10
207
24
15
17















Microstructure




















Ratio of length of


Mechanical






grain boundary having


characteristics



















rotation angle in range
Dislocation

Tensile
Hydrogen



Manufacture
B + TM
Remainder
in range of 55° to 75°
density
Lath width
strength
embrittlement



No.
(area %)
(area %)
(%)
(1015 m/m2)
(nm)
(MPa)
resistance
Note





31
74
3
50
4.5
175
2179
Very Good
Example of invention


32
74
4
45
4.7
187
2079
Very Good
Example of invention


33
70
4
48
6.2
167
2198
Very Good
Example of invention


34
74
3
40
5.5
270
1310
Good
Comparative Example


35
73
3
43
6.3
166
1291
Good
Comparative Example


36
83
1
58
4.5
166
2398
Bad
Comparative Example


37
64
9
41
6.3
187
2021
Bad
Comparative Example


38
71
3
21
6.3
163
2414
Bad
Comparative Example


39
68
4
48
4.7
165
1280
Good
Comparative Example


40
75
1
52
6.2
183
1191
Good
Comparative Example


41
74
2
40
5.4
182
1290
Good
Comparative Example


42
58
18
46
5.5
182
2042
Bad
Comparative Example


43
73
4
49
5.4
186
1187
Good
Comparative Example


44
68
4
43
6.0
186
2104
Bad
Comparative Example


45
76
1
41
5.3
166
2164
Bad
Comparative Example


46
70
2
53
4.5
183
2188
Bad
Comparative Example


47
61
22
53
5.5
167
2146
Bad
Comparative Example


48
67
13
60
5.1
192
2398
Bad
Comparative Example


49
72
9
60
5.9
171
2397
Bad
Comparative Example


50
70
11
53
5.2
194
2328
Bad
Comparative Example


51
75
6
60
6.5
173
2432
Bad
Comparative Example


52
77
4
23
5.3
189
2006
Bad
Comparative Example


53
74
6
58
3.3
182
1466
Good
Comparative Example


54
79
3
19
5.0
192
2058
Bad
Comparative Example


55
78
5
50
5.4
191
2414
Bad
Comparative Example


56
91
2
50
5.3
181
2107
Bad
Comparative Example


 57*
77
6
19
5.6
175
2290
Bad
Comparative Example





An underline represents that a condition is out of the range of the present invention, a manufacturing condition is not preferred, or characteristicsare not preferred.


*heating and holding before holding at low temperature






INDUSTRIAL APPLICABILITY

According to the aspect of the present invention, it is possible to obtain a hot-stamping formed body that is excellent in strength and hydrogen embrittlement resistance.

Claims
  • 1. A hot-stamping formed body comprising, as a chemical composition, by mass %: C: more than 0.50% and 1.00% or less;Si: 0.50% to 3.00%;Mn: more than 3.00% and 5.00% or less;Al: 0.100% to 3.000%;Co: 0.100% to 3.000%;P: 0.100% or less;S: 0.1000% or less;N: 0.0100% or less;Nb: 0% to 0.150%;Ti: 0% to 0.150%;Mo: 0% to 1.00%;Cr: 0% to 1.00%;Cu: 0% to 1.00%;V: 0% to 1.00%;W: 0% to 1.00%;Ni: 0% to 3.00%;Mg: 0% to 1.00%;Zr: 0% to 1.00%;Sb: 0% to 1.00%;Ca: 0% to 0.10%;REM: 0% to 0.30%;B: 0% to 0.0100%; anda remainder consisting of Fe and impurities; andmicrostructure which includes residual austenite of which an area ratio is in a range of 20% to 30%, bainite and tempered martensite of which a total area ratio is in a range of 70% to 80%, and a remainder in microstructure of which an area ratio is less than 5%,among grain boundaries of crystal grains of the bainite and the tempered martensite, a ratio of a length of a grain boundary having a rotation angle in a range of 55° to 75° to a total length of a grain boundary having a rotation angle in a range of 4° to 12°, a grain boundary having a rotation angle in a range of 49° to 54°, and a grain boundary having a rotation angle in the range of 55° to 75° to the <011> direction as a rotation axis is 30% or more.
  • 2. The hot-stamping formed body according to claim 1, further comprising, as the chemical composition, by mass %, at least one selected from the group of: Nb: 0.010% to 0.150%;Ti: 0.010% to 0.150%;Mo: 0.005% to 1.00%;Cr: 0.005% to 1.00%;Cu: 0.001% to 1.00%;V: 0.0005% to 1.00%;W: 0.001% to 1.00%;Ni: 0.001% to 3.00%;Mg: 0.001% to 1.00%;Zr: 0.001% to 1.00%;Sb: 0.001% to 1.00%;Ca: 0.001% to 0.10%;REM: 0.001% to 0.30%; andB: 0.0005% to 0.0100%.
  • 3. A hot-stamping formed body comprising, as a chemical composition, by mass %: C: more than 0.50% and 1.00% or less;Si: 0.50% to 3.00%;Mn: more than 3.00% and 5.00% or less;Al: 0.100% to 3.000%;Co: 0.100% to 3.000%;P: 0.100% or less;S: 0.1000% or less;N: 0.0100% or less;Nb: 0% to 0.150%;Ti: 0% to 0.150%;Mo: 0% to 1.00%;Cr: 0% to 1.00%;Cu: 0% to 1.00%;V: 0% to 1.00%;W: 0% to 1.00%;Ni: 0% to 3.00%;Mg: 0% to 1.00%;Zr: 0% to 1.00%;Sb: 0% to 1.00%;Ca: 0% to 0.10%;REM: 0% to 0.30%;B: 0% to 0.0100%; anda remainder comprising Fe and impurities; andmicrostructure which includes residual austenite of which an area ratio is in a range of 20% to 30%, bainite and tempered martensite of which a total area ratio is in a range of 70% to 80%, and a remainder in microstructure of which an area ratio is less than 5%,among grain boundaries of crystal grains of the bainite and the tempered martensite, a ratio of a length of a grain boundary having a rotation angle in a range of 55° to 75° to a total length of a grain boundary having a rotation angle in a range of 4° to 12°, a grain boundary having a rotation angle in a range of 49° to 54°, and a grain boundary having a rotation angle in the range of 55° to 75° to the <011> direction as a rotation axis is 30% or more.
Priority Claims (1)
Number Date Country Kind
2020-002409 Jan 2020 JP national
PCT Information
Filing Document Filing Date Country Kind
PCT/JP2021/000416 1/8/2021 WO