HSA swage metrology calibration using solid weight gauge and torque sensor

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 9157817
  • Patent Number
    9,157,817
  • Date Filed
    Monday, June 9, 2014
    10 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, October 13, 2015
    9 years ago
Abstract
An assembly may comprise a head stack assembly (HSA) swaging tester device, comprising a base and a top tooling assembly connected thereto. The top tooling assembly may comprise an actuator motor; a load cell connected to the actuator motor; and a force gauge connected to the load cell, the force gauge being configured to measure torque imparted by the actuator motor on an HSA under manufacture. The force gauge of the HSA swaging tester device may be calibrated according to a selected type of HSA to undergo the swaging procedure by coupling a selected reference torque assembly to an axle connected to the actuator motor, the selected reference torque assembly being configured to impart a known torque onto the axle. The force gauge may then be adjusted (e.g., calibrated) according to the known torque imparted upon the axle by the selected reference torque assembly.
Description
BACKGROUND

Embodiments related to the manufacture of rotating media data storage devices. In particular, embodiments related to the manufacture and testing of components of magnetic hard disk drives.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS


FIG. 1 shows aspects of a conventional head gimbal assembly (HGA) torque out test algorithm.



FIG. 2A shows an assembly according to one embodiment.



FIG. 2B shows another view of an assembly according to one embodiment.



FIG. 3A shows further aspects of one embodiment.



FIG. 3B shows further aspects of one embodiment.



FIG. 4 shows one exemplary implementation of a reference torque assembly, according to one embodiment.



FIG. 5 is a perspective view of the calibration of a swage torque tester using a dummy actuator pivot flex assembly (APFA), according to one embodiment.



FIG. 6 is a flow chart of a method of calibrating a swage torque tester using a selected reference torque assembly, according to one embodiment.





DETAILED DESCRIPTION

Hard disk drives are critical data storage devices in modern computers. Structurally, a slider comprising read and write transducers is attached to the end of an HGA which is attached to an actuator arm to form a head stack assembly (HSA) through a ball swaging process. This process uses a stainless steel ball having a diameter that is wider than a corresponding boss and hole in a base plate of the HGA. As the ball is forced through the hole, the base plate expands and deforms. This deformation mechanically attaches the HGA to the actuator arm with a predetermined amount of contact pressure and retention torque.


One method of determining swaged torque retention values is to test for rotational torque, as shown in FIG. 1. A torque meter is attached to the swage mount of the HGA base plate 102 and rotated until the swage mount is displaced, rotating the swage mount with respect to the actuator arm 104. The amount of ensuing displacement is related to the amount of contact pressure and retention torque. That is, a predetermined amount (e.g., angle 106) of rotation is observed for a given amount of torque imparted upon the swage mount. As long as the angle 106 is within acceptable limits, the swaging process is considered to have been carried out within acceptable tolerances.


The swage torque tester itself requires calibration to ensure that the swaging process is being carried out with the proper amount of contact pressure and retention torque. Conventionally, a hand torque gauge is used as a master to calibrate the swage torque tester. However, this method of swage torque metrology calibration using a hand torque gauge is not an accurate way to measure the performance of the swage torque tester. This is because, it has been observed, hand torque gauges are susceptible to significant variations in its torque measurement output (typically, about 6%), resulting in uncertainty of the readings. Moreover, conventionally, the ongoing monitoring of the tester's stability is carried out using sample HSA parts. This is problematic because sample parts are not actual parts and the value of the actuator arm—HGA retention force on an actual part is unknown. For these reasons, swage torque testers calibrated with a hand torque gauge cannot accurately and consistently represent or predict the performance of the swage torque tester on actual products. Indeed, due to the torque contributions of different parts of the swage torque tester and the variability of the hand torque gauge's output readings, there is an unacceptable uncertainty when attempting to determine whether the HGAs are adequately swaged onto the actuator arms so as to exhibit the desired swage torque retention characteristics.


To qualify the swage torque tester, a destructive Gauge Repeatability & Reproduce (GRR) may be performed using actual parts. However, this technique is believed to be inadequate to accurately characterize the performance of the swage torque tester, because the actual value of the swage torque retention in the part under test is itself unknown, which leads to further difficulties in manufacturing and assembly of parts across whole distributions of product specifications.


One embodiment comprises a systematic design for qualification and calibration of HSA swage metrology using a plurality of reference torque assemblies and a high-precision torque sensor. Indeed, one embodiment comprises reference torque assemblies comprising a removable rod of known length and a selected one of a plurality of different reference weights that may be used to generate known values of torque for performing GRR and system monitoring, thereby covering a whole distribution of HGA torque out specifications.


Aspects of one embodiment are shown in FIGS. 2A and 2B. As shown therein, an assembly may comprise a HSA swaging tester device 200. The HSA swaging tester device 200 may comprise a base 202 and a top tooling assembly 204 connected to the base 202. The top tooling assembly 204 may comprise an actuator motor 206. A load cell 208 and a force gauge 210 may be connected to the actuator motor 206. The force gauge 210 is connected to the load cell 208 and may be configured to measure torque imparted by the actuator motor 206 on an HSA being manufactured during an HSA swaging procedure. In this manner, the HSA swaging tester device 200 may detect and measure the force imparted on the HSA during the HSA swaging or testing procedure. The present HSA swaging tester device 200 may be configured with the ability to communicate to an engineering control system and database to automate HSA swage test data recording and monitoring.


One embodiment enables the HSA swaging tester device 200 to be adjusted (e.g., calibrated) by imparting a known torque onto a dummy APFA, as shown at 212 in FIG. 2A. The actuator motor 206 may be coupled to the dummy APFA by an axle 214, as shown at 242 in FIG. 2B. According to one embodiment, the force gauge of the HSA swaging tester device 200 may calibrated according to a selected one of a plurality of types of HSAs to undergo the swage testing procedure. Indeed, different types of HSAs have different torque out requirements and the HSA swaging tester device should be calibrated differently according to which of the plurality of types of HSAs is to undergo swage testing.


Rather than coupling a hand torque gauge to the axle 214 coupled to the actuator motor 206 and the dummy actuator arms of the dummy APFA, one embodiment comprises coupling a selected one of a plurality of reference torque assemblies 216 to the axle 214, which extends through aligned openings in the respective actuator arms of the dummy APFA. According to one embodiment, each of the plurality of reference torque assemblies may be associated with a respective one of the plurality of types of HSAs to undergo the swaging testing procedure. Indeed, each of the plurality of reference torque assemblies 216 is configured to impart a known torque onto the axle, which known torque may be selected according to the type of HSA under test. The force gauge 210 may then be adjusted (e.g., calibrated, tared) according to the known torque imparted upon the axle 214 by the selected reference torque assembly 216. This known torque, imparted upon the axle 214, may be measured using a high precision torque sensor 218.


The high-precision torque sensor 218 may be configured with reference to the APFA dimensions and to integrate the torque sensor 218 into the swaging area of the HSA swaging tester device 200, and into the location of the base plate swage boss assembly. The high precision torque sensor 218 may be configured to be adjustable with torque values representing the whole distribution of swage torque specifications for every head position on the arm.



FIGS. 3A and 3B illustrate the principle of operation of the reference torque assemblies 216. According to one embodiment, one or more of the plurality of the reference torque assemblies may be unitary (e.g., molded or assembled into a fixed assembly) device or may be a composite assembly. As shown in FIGS. 3A and 3B, a reference torque assembly, according to one embodiment, may comprise a rod 302 that is configured to couple to the axle 214 of the HSA swaging tester device 200. Connected to the rod 302 at a known distance D from an end thereof is a reference (known) weight (a static load). In FIG. 3A, the reference weight is a first reference weight 304A and in FIG. 3B, the reference weight is a second reference weight 304B. In FIGS. 3A and 3B, the reference weight 304A is shown to be greater than the reference weight 3048. Accordingly, the force vector FA exerted onto the rod 302 in FIG. 3A is greater than the force vector FB exerted onto the rod 302 in FIG. 3B. A plurality of such reference torque assemblies may be provided, each with different reference weights (thereby generating different torques), configured for use in conjunction with the calibration of HSA swaging tester device 200 for use with different types of HSAs having respective different torque out requirements.


From FIGS. 3A and 3B, therefore, the rod 302 acts as a lever arm and the axle 214 defines the axis about which the axle 214 is caused to rotate due to the force vector FA, FB. This tendency of the axle 214 to rotate about the axis defined by axle 214 under the influence of the force vector FA, FB is called torque, moment or moment of force and is shown in FIGS. 3A and 3B as MA and MB. Mathematically, MA=D×FA and MB=D×FB, where the operator X is the cross product of the scalar D and the force vector FA, FB. The magnitude of torque MA, MB depends on three quantities: the force FA, FB applied, the length D of the lever arm, and the angle between the force vector FA, FB and the lever arm. One embodiment maintains the aforementioned angle at 90 degrees (relative to the rod 302), although reference torque assemblies 216 may be configured with other angles.


As noted above, the reference torque assemblies may be unitary in nature. According to one embodiment, one or more of the reference torque assemblies 216 shown herein may comprise a removable rod 302 configured to removably couple to axle 214 connected to the actuator motor 206 and a selected one of a plurality of different reference weights 304, as shown in FIG. 4. According to one embodiment, each of the plurality of different reference weights 304 may be associated with a respective one of the plurality of types of HSAs to undergo the swaging or testing procedure. In use, each of the plurality of different reference weights 304 is configured to removably couple to the removable rod 302 at a predetermined distance (such as distance “D” in FIGS. 3A and 3B) from an end thereof. The design of the reference weights 304 may be optimized for easy fabrication and for cost reduction. To maintain the length of the cantilever beam (rod 302) and the center of gravity of the reference torque assemblies, the reference weights 304 may be designed to have the same cross section for all gauges and different heights. Other configurations and shapes for the reference weights 304 and/or rods 302 are possible.


As shown in FIG. 5, the reference torque assemblies may be configured to be radially repositioned on the axle 214 connected the actuator motor to enable a re-calibration of the force gauge, with reference to the high precision torque sensor 218, at different radial positions.


One embodiment is a method for calibrating a swage torque tester. As disclosed above, such a method may comprise affixing a rod 302 of a known length to a torque sensor of a swage torque tester 200 and coupling a known weight 304 to the rod 302 such as to create a reference torque against which the swage torque tester 200 may be calibrated. The swage torque tester device 200 may then be adjusted until the output torque reading thereof substantially matches the reference torque applied by the reference torque assembly coupled to the rod 302.



FIG. 6 is a flowchart of a method according to one embodiment. As shown therein, the method may begin at B61, whereupon a HSA swaging tester device is provided, as shown at B62. According to one embodiment, the HSA swaging tester device (shown at 200 in FIGS. 2A, 2B and 5) may comprise a base 202, a top tooling assembly 204 connected to the base 202. The top tooling assembly 204 may comprise an actuator motor 206, a load cell 208 connected to the actuator motor 206 and a force gauge 210 connected to the load cell 208. The force gauge 210 may be configured to measure torque imparted by the actuator motor 206 on an HSA being manufactured during an HSA swaging procedure (or a previously-manufactured HSA). Block B63 calls for calibrating the force gauge according to a selected one of a plurality of types of HSAs to undergo the swaging or testing procedure. This may be carried out, according to one embodiment by coupling a selected one of a plurality of reference torque assemblies 216 to the axle 214 connected the actuator motor 206, which selected reference torque assembly 216 is configured to impart a known torque onto the axle 214, as shown at B64. Block B65 then calls for adjusting the force gauge according to the torque imparted upon the axle 214 by the selected reference torque assembly 216. The method ends at B67.


According to one embodiment, calibrating in Block B63 may comprise selecting one of the plurality of reference torque assemblies according to the selected type of HSA to undergo the swaging or testing procedure. As noted above, one or more of the plurality of reference torque assemblies may comprises a removable rod 302 configured to couple to an axle 214 connected to the actuator motor 206 and a selected one of a plurality of different reference weights 304. Each of the plurality of different reference weights may be associated with a respective one of the plurality of types of HSAs to undergo the swaging or testing procedure. Coupling, in Block B64, may comprise coupling the removable rod 302 to the axle 214 connected to the actuator motor 206 and coupling the selected reference weight 304 to the removable rod 302 at a known distance from an end thereof.


The method, according to one embodiment may also comprise removing the selected reference torque assembly 216 from the axle 214 coupled to the actuator motor 206, mounting an HSA of the selected type on the top tooling assembly 204 and carrying out the HSA swaging testing procedure on the mounted HSA with reference to the calibrated force gauge.


The method also encompasses re-adjusting or re-calibrating the HSA swaging tester device 200 by selecting another one of the plurality of reference torque assemblies 216 associated with a selected other one of the plurality of types of HSAs to undergo the swaging or testing procedure and coupling the selected reference torque assembly 216 to the axle 214 connected to the actuator motor 206. The force gauge may then be calibrated according to this selected other type of HSA to undergo the swaging or testing procedure by adjusting the force gauge according to the torque imparted upon the rod 302 by the selected other one of the plurality of reference torque assemblies 216.


The selected other reference torque assembly 216 may then be removed from the axle 214 coupled to the actuator motor 206, another HSA of another type may then be mounted on the top tooling assembly 204 and the HSA swaging or testing procedure may then be carried out on the mounted HSA with reference to the calibrated force gauge. Adjusting may be carried out with a dummy actuator pivot flex assembly (APFA) mounted to the top tooling assembly 204 (instead of, for example, a real HSA that would require destructive testing). The selected reference torque assembly 216 may then be radially re-positioned on the axle 214 connected the actuator motor 206 and the force gauge may be re-calibrated with the reference torque assembly 216 positioned at this new radial position on the axle 214.


Significantly, embodiments eliminate operator dependency and reduce the effect of material variation. The result is improved HSA mechanical yield and productivity. By improving the calibration, qualification and monitoring system of swage torque metrology, greater tester accuracy and efficiency is achieved.


While certain embodiments of the disclosure have been described, these embodiments have been presented by way of example only, and are not intended to limit the scope of the disclosure. Indeed, the novel methods, devices and systems described herein may be embodied in a variety of other forms. Furthermore, various omissions, substitutions and changes in the form of the methods and systems described herein may be made without departing from the spirit of the disclosure. The accompanying claims and their equivalents are intended to cover such forms or modifications as would fall within the scope and spirit of the disclosure. For example, those skilled in the art will appreciate that in various embodiments, the actual physical and logical structures may differ from those shown in the figures. Depending on the embodiment, certain steps described in the example above may be removed, others may be added. Also, the features and attributes of the specific embodiments disclosed above may be combined in different ways to form additional embodiments, all of which fall within the scope of the present disclosure. Although the present disclosure provides certain preferred embodiments and applications, other embodiments that are apparent to those of ordinary skill in the art, including embodiments which do not provide all of the features and advantages set forth herein, are also within the scope of this disclosure.

Claims
  • 1. An assembly, comprising: a head stack assembly (HSA) swaging tester device, the HSA swaging tester device comprising: a base;a top tooling assembly connected to the base, the top tooling assembly comprising: an actuator motor;a load cell connected to the actuator motor; anda force gauge connected to the load cell, the force gauge being configured to measure torque imparted by the actuator motor on an HSA being manufactured during an HSA swaging procedure; anda selected one of a plurality of reference torque assemblies;wherein the force gauge of the HSA swaging tester device is configured to be calibrated according to a selected one of a plurality of types of HSAs to undergo the swaging procedure by: coupling the selected one of the plurality of reference torque assemblies to an axle connected to the actuator motor, the selected reference torque assembly being configured to impart a known torque onto the axle; andadjusting the force gauge according to the torque imparted upon the axle by the selected reference torque assembly.
  • 2. The assembly of claim 1, wherein each of the plurality of reference torque assemblies is associated with a respective one of the plurality of types of HSAs to undergo the swaging procedure.
  • 3. The assembly of claim 2, wherein at least one of the plurality of reference torque assemblies comprises a removable rod configured to couple to an axle connected to the actuator motor; and a selected one of a plurality of different reference weights, each of the plurality of different reference weights being associated with a respective one of the plurality of types of HSAs to undergo the swaging procedure.
  • 4. The assembly of claim 3, wherein each of the plurality of different reference weights has a same cross-section and a different height.
  • 5. The assembly of claim 3, wherein each of the plurality of different reference weights is configured to removably couple to the removable rod at a predetermined distance from an end thereof.
  • 6. The assembly of claim 1, further comprising a dummy actuator pivot flex assembly mounted to the top tooling assembly.
  • 7. The assembly of claim 1, wherein the selected one of a plurality of reference torque assemblies is configured to be radially repositioned on the axle connected the actuator motor to enable a re-calibration of the force gauge.
  • 8. A method, comprising: providing a head stack assembly (HSA) swaging tester device, the HSA swaging tester device comprising a base, a top tooling assembly connected to the base, the top tooling assembly comprising an actuator motor, a load cell connected to the actuator motor and a force gauge connected to the load cell, the force gauge being configured to measure torque imparted by the actuator motor on an HSA being manufactured during an HSA swaging procedure; andcalibrating the force gauge according to a selected one of a plurality of types of HSAs to undergo the swaging procedure by: coupling a selected one of a plurality of reference torque assemblies to an axle connected the actuator motor, the selected reference torque assembly being configured to impart a known torque onto the axle; and adjusting the force gauge according to the torque imparted upon the axle by the selected reference torque assembly.
  • 9. The method of claim 8, wherein calibrating comprises selecting one of the plurality of reference torque assemblies according to the selected type of HSA to undergo the swaging procedure.
  • 10. The method of claim 8, wherein at least one of the plurality of reference torque assemblies comprises a removable rod configured to couple to an axle connected to the actuator motor; and a selected one of a plurality of different reference weights, each of the plurality of different reference weights being associated with a respective one of the plurality of types of HSAs to undergo the swaging procedure, and wherein coupling comprises: coupling the removable rod to the axle connected to the actuator motor; andcoupling the selected reference weight to the removable rod at a known distance from an end thereof.
  • 11. The method of claim 10, wherein each of the plurality of different reference weights has a same cross-section and a different height.
  • 12. The method of claim 8, further comprising: removing the selected reference torque assembly from the axle coupled to the actuator motor;mounting an HSA of the selected type on the top tooling assembly; andcarrying out an HSA swaging testing procedure on the mounted HSA, with reference to the calibrated force gauge.
  • 13. The method of claim 10, further comprising: selecting another one of the plurality of reference torque assemblies associated with a selected other one of the plurality of types of HSAs to undergo the swaging procedure;coupling the selected other one of the plurality of reference torque assemblies to the axle connected to the actuator motor; andcalibrating the force gauge according to the selected other one of the plurality of types of HSAs to undergo the swaging procedure by:adjusting the force gauge according to the torque imparted upon the rod by the selected other one of the plurality of reference torque assemblies.
  • 14. The method of claim 13, further comprising: removing the selected other one of the plurality of reference torque assemblies from the axle coupled to the actuator motor;mounting an HSA of the selected other type on the top tooling assembly; andcarrying out the HSA swaging procedure on the mounted HSA with reference to the calibrated force gauge.
  • 15. The method of claim 8, wherein adjusting is carried out with a dummy actuator pivot flex assembly mounted to the top tooling assembly.
  • 16. The method of claim 8, further comprising radially re-positioning the selected one of a plurality of reference torque assemblies on the axle connected the actuator motor and re-calibrating the force gauge.
US Referenced Citations (124)
Number Name Date Kind
5793634 Demarest et al. Aug 1998 A
5948997 Schmidt Sep 1999 A
6049973 Frank, Jr. et al. Apr 2000 A
6225799 Gergel et al. May 2001 B1
6467153 Butts et al. Oct 2002 B2
6539818 Verhey et al. Apr 2003 B1
6585256 Blackwell et al. Jul 2003 B2
6651192 Viglione et al. Nov 2003 B1
6657801 Chue et al. Dec 2003 B1
6687093 Butler et al. Feb 2004 B1
6751041 Codilian et al. Jun 2004 B1
6788480 Codilian et al. Sep 2004 B1
6791782 Codilian et al. Sep 2004 B1
6792669 Codilian Sep 2004 B2
6798592 Codilian et al. Sep 2004 B1
6894861 Codilian et al. May 2005 B1
6897393 Codilian et al. May 2005 B1
6898044 Chheda May 2005 B1
6943972 Chue et al. Sep 2005 B1
7003626 Chheda et al. Feb 2006 B1
7027242 Terrill et al. Apr 2006 B1
7046467 Chheda May 2006 B1
7058759 Reiser et al. Jun 2006 B1
7072129 Cullen et al. Jul 2006 B1
7076391 Pakzad et al. Jul 2006 B1
7076603 Chheda Jul 2006 B1
7136242 Chue et al. Nov 2006 B1
7139145 Archibald et al. Nov 2006 B1
7145744 Clawson et al. Dec 2006 B1
7178432 Han et al. Feb 2007 B1
7199959 Bryant Apr 2007 B1
7203020 Viglione et al. Apr 2007 B1
7209310 Tsai et al. Apr 2007 B1
7222410 Klassen et al. May 2007 B1
7236911 Gough et al. Jun 2007 B1
7269525 Gough et al. Sep 2007 B1
7458282 Wuester, Sr. et al. Dec 2008 B1
7490398 Klassen et al. Feb 2009 B1
7506553 Panyavoravaj Mar 2009 B1
7549204 Vangal-Ramamurthy et al. Jun 2009 B1
7552526 Klassen et al. Jun 2009 B1
7559590 Jones Jul 2009 B1
7561416 Sarraf Jul 2009 B1
7596722 Pakzad et al. Sep 2009 B1
7634375 Pakzad et al. Dec 2009 B1
7653983 Klassen Feb 2010 B1
7669711 Westwood Mar 2010 B1
7671599 Tan et al. Mar 2010 B1
7673638 Boynton et al. Mar 2010 B1
7690705 Roberts et al. Apr 2010 B1
7694410 Kamigama et al. Apr 2010 B2
7743486 Klassen et al. Jun 2010 B1
7863889 Bamrungtham Jan 2011 B1
7869182 Tan et al. Jan 2011 B1
7869183 Tan et al. Jan 2011 B1
7874424 Westwood Jan 2011 B1
7896218 Rakpongsiri et al. Mar 2011 B2
7900272 Tan et al. Mar 2011 B1
7912666 Pakzad et al. Mar 2011 B1
7916599 Panyavoravaj et al. Mar 2011 B1
7921543 Trongjitwikrai et al. Apr 2011 B2
7940487 Krishnan et al. May 2011 B1
7974038 Krishnan et al. Jul 2011 B2
7980159 Han Jul 2011 B1
7987585 Klassen et al. Aug 2011 B1
8066171 Rakpongsiri et al. Nov 2011 B1
8078421 Shastry et al. Dec 2011 B1
8092610 Tarrant Jan 2012 B1
8094414 Cheng et al. Jan 2012 B1
8098460 Jen et al. Jan 2012 B1
8127643 Tan Mar 2012 B1
8135208 Vangal-Ramamurthy Mar 2012 B1
8162366 Tan et al. Apr 2012 B1
8168033 Mohamad Nor May 2012 B1
8180487 Vangal-Ramamurthy et al. May 2012 B1
8199425 Gustafson et al. Jun 2012 B1
8218256 Lin et al. Jul 2012 B1
8223448 Haw et al. Jul 2012 B1
8230570 Choong Jul 2012 B1
8245601 Hastama et al. Aug 2012 B1
8267831 Olsen et al. Sep 2012 B1
8270118 Cheng et al. Sep 2012 B1
8300338 McFadyen Oct 2012 B1
8307537 Klassen et al. Nov 2012 B1
8312585 Tarrant Nov 2012 B1
8322235 Keopuang et al. Dec 2012 B1
8327529 Tan et al. Dec 2012 B1
8335049 Liu et al. Dec 2012 B1
8345367 Tharumalingam Jan 2013 B1
8356384 Ferre et al. Jan 2013 B1
8369073 Trinh et al. Feb 2013 B2
8379363 Kolunthavelu et al. Feb 2013 B1
8387631 Thonghara et al. Mar 2013 B1
8424418 Wuester, Sr. et al. Apr 2013 B1
8424824 Tan et al. Apr 2013 B1
8432630 Lin et al. Apr 2013 B1
8432631 Lin et al. Apr 2013 B1
8447430 Tan et al. May 2013 B1
8447551 Ong et al. May 2013 B1
8451578 Tan et al. May 2013 B1
8453841 James et al. Jun 2013 B1
8454755 Tan et al. Jun 2013 B1
8485772 Ismail et al. Jul 2013 B1
8493681 Selvaraj Jul 2013 B1
8537480 Haw Sep 2013 B1
8544164 Cheng et al. Oct 2013 B1
8547657 Liu et al. Oct 2013 B1
8553968 Lee et al. Oct 2013 B1
8561285 Vangal-Ramamurthy et al. Oct 2013 B1
8565511 Sungkhaphong et al. Oct 2013 B1
8582229 Krishnan Nov 2013 B1
8596107 Wongdao et al. Dec 2013 B1
8605383 Wang et al. Dec 2013 B1
8640328 Yow et al. Feb 2014 B1
8650716 Methe et al. Feb 2014 B1
8653824 Liu et al. Feb 2014 B1
8662554 Srisupun et al. Mar 2014 B1
8683676 Wuester, Sr. et al. Apr 2014 B1
8689433 Choong Apr 2014 B1
20080084630 Trongjitwikrai et al. Apr 2008 A1
20090157848 Khoo Jun 2009 A1
20100108256 Roajanasiri et al. May 2010 A1
20130057986 Vangal-Ramamurthy et al. Mar 2013 A1
20130248545 Thongjitti et al. Sep 2013 A1