Embodiments related to the manufacture of rotating media data storage devices. In particular, embodiments related to the manufacture and testing of components of magnetic hard disk drives.
Hard disk drives are critical data storage devices in modern computers. Structurally, a slider comprising read and write transducers is attached to the end of an HGA which is attached to an actuator arm to form a head stack assembly (HSA) through a ball swaging process. This process uses a stainless steel ball having a diameter that is wider than a corresponding boss and hole in a base plate of the HGA. As the ball is forced through the hole, the base plate expands and deforms. This deformation mechanically attaches the HGA to the actuator arm with a predetermined amount of contact pressure and retention torque.
One method of determining swaged torque retention values is to test for rotational torque, as shown in
The swage torque tester itself requires calibration to ensure that the swaging process is being carried out with the proper amount of contact pressure and retention torque. Conventionally, a hand torque gauge is used as a master to calibrate the swage torque tester. However, this method of swage torque metrology calibration using a hand torque gauge is not an accurate way to measure the performance of the swage torque tester. This is because, it has been observed, hand torque gauges are susceptible to significant variations in its torque measurement output (typically, about 6%), resulting in uncertainty of the readings. Moreover, conventionally, the ongoing monitoring of the tester's stability is carried out using sample HSA parts. This is problematic because sample parts are not actual parts and the value of the actuator arm—HGA retention force on an actual part is unknown. For these reasons, swage torque testers calibrated with a hand torque gauge cannot accurately and consistently represent or predict the performance of the swage torque tester on actual products. Indeed, due to the torque contributions of different parts of the swage torque tester and the variability of the hand torque gauge's output readings, there is an unacceptable uncertainty when attempting to determine whether the HGAs are adequately swaged onto the actuator arms so as to exhibit the desired swage torque retention characteristics.
To qualify the swage torque tester, a destructive Gauge Repeatability & Reproduce (GRR) may be performed using actual parts. However, this technique is believed to be inadequate to accurately characterize the performance of the swage torque tester, because the actual value of the swage torque retention in the part under test is itself unknown, which leads to further difficulties in manufacturing and assembly of parts across whole distributions of product specifications.
One embodiment comprises a systematic design for qualification and calibration of HSA swage metrology using a plurality of reference torque assemblies and a high-precision torque sensor. Indeed, one embodiment comprises reference torque assemblies comprising a removable rod of known length and a selected one of a plurality of different reference weights that may be used to generate known values of torque for performing GRR and system monitoring, thereby covering a whole distribution of HGA torque out specifications.
Aspects of one embodiment are shown in
One embodiment enables the HSA swaging tester device 200 to be adjusted (e.g., calibrated) by imparting a known torque onto a dummy APFA, as shown at 212 in
Rather than coupling a hand torque gauge to the axle 214 coupled to the actuator motor 206 and the dummy actuator arms of the dummy APFA, one embodiment comprises coupling a selected one of a plurality of reference torque assemblies 216 to the axle 214, which extends through aligned openings in the respective actuator arms of the dummy APFA. According to one embodiment, each of the plurality of reference torque assemblies may be associated with a respective one of the plurality of types of HSAs to undergo the swaging testing procedure. Indeed, each of the plurality of reference torque assemblies 216 is configured to impart a known torque onto the axle, which known torque may be selected according to the type of HSA under test. The force gauge 210 may then be adjusted (e.g., calibrated, tared) according to the known torque imparted upon the axle 214 by the selected reference torque assembly 216. This known torque, imparted upon the axle 214, may be measured using a high precision torque sensor 218.
The high-precision torque sensor 218 may be configured with reference to the APFA dimensions and to integrate the torque sensor 218 into the swaging area of the HSA swaging tester device 200, and into the location of the base plate swage boss assembly. The high precision torque sensor 218 may be configured to be adjustable with torque values representing the whole distribution of swage torque specifications for every head position on the arm.
From
As noted above, the reference torque assemblies may be unitary in nature. According to one embodiment, one or more of the reference torque assemblies 216 shown herein may comprise a removable rod 302 configured to removably couple to axle 214 connected to the actuator motor 206 and a selected one of a plurality of different reference weights 304, as shown in
As shown in
One embodiment is a method for calibrating a swage torque tester. As disclosed above, such a method may comprise affixing a rod 302 of a known length to a torque sensor of a swage torque tester 200 and coupling a known weight 304 to the rod 302 such as to create a reference torque against which the swage torque tester 200 may be calibrated. The swage torque tester device 200 may then be adjusted until the output torque reading thereof substantially matches the reference torque applied by the reference torque assembly coupled to the rod 302.
According to one embodiment, calibrating in Block B63 may comprise selecting one of the plurality of reference torque assemblies according to the selected type of HSA to undergo the swaging or testing procedure. As noted above, one or more of the plurality of reference torque assemblies may comprises a removable rod 302 configured to couple to an axle 214 connected to the actuator motor 206 and a selected one of a plurality of different reference weights 304. Each of the plurality of different reference weights may be associated with a respective one of the plurality of types of HSAs to undergo the swaging or testing procedure. Coupling, in Block B64, may comprise coupling the removable rod 302 to the axle 214 connected to the actuator motor 206 and coupling the selected reference weight 304 to the removable rod 302 at a known distance from an end thereof.
The method, according to one embodiment may also comprise removing the selected reference torque assembly 216 from the axle 214 coupled to the actuator motor 206, mounting an HSA of the selected type on the top tooling assembly 204 and carrying out the HSA swaging testing procedure on the mounted HSA with reference to the calibrated force gauge.
The method also encompasses re-adjusting or re-calibrating the HSA swaging tester device 200 by selecting another one of the plurality of reference torque assemblies 216 associated with a selected other one of the plurality of types of HSAs to undergo the swaging or testing procedure and coupling the selected reference torque assembly 216 to the axle 214 connected to the actuator motor 206. The force gauge may then be calibrated according to this selected other type of HSA to undergo the swaging or testing procedure by adjusting the force gauge according to the torque imparted upon the rod 302 by the selected other one of the plurality of reference torque assemblies 216.
The selected other reference torque assembly 216 may then be removed from the axle 214 coupled to the actuator motor 206, another HSA of another type may then be mounted on the top tooling assembly 204 and the HSA swaging or testing procedure may then be carried out on the mounted HSA with reference to the calibrated force gauge. Adjusting may be carried out with a dummy actuator pivot flex assembly (APFA) mounted to the top tooling assembly 204 (instead of, for example, a real HSA that would require destructive testing). The selected reference torque assembly 216 may then be radially re-positioned on the axle 214 connected the actuator motor 206 and the force gauge may be re-calibrated with the reference torque assembly 216 positioned at this new radial position on the axle 214.
Significantly, embodiments eliminate operator dependency and reduce the effect of material variation. The result is improved HSA mechanical yield and productivity. By improving the calibration, qualification and monitoring system of swage torque metrology, greater tester accuracy and efficiency is achieved.
While certain embodiments of the disclosure have been described, these embodiments have been presented by way of example only, and are not intended to limit the scope of the disclosure. Indeed, the novel methods, devices and systems described herein may be embodied in a variety of other forms. Furthermore, various omissions, substitutions and changes in the form of the methods and systems described herein may be made without departing from the spirit of the disclosure. The accompanying claims and their equivalents are intended to cover such forms or modifications as would fall within the scope and spirit of the disclosure. For example, those skilled in the art will appreciate that in various embodiments, the actual physical and logical structures may differ from those shown in the figures. Depending on the embodiment, certain steps described in the example above may be removed, others may be added. Also, the features and attributes of the specific embodiments disclosed above may be combined in different ways to form additional embodiments, all of which fall within the scope of the present disclosure. Although the present disclosure provides certain preferred embodiments and applications, other embodiments that are apparent to those of ordinary skill in the art, including embodiments which do not provide all of the features and advantages set forth herein, are also within the scope of this disclosure.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
5793634 | Demarest et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
5948997 | Schmidt | Sep 1999 | A |
6049973 | Frank, Jr. et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6225799 | Gergel et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6467153 | Butts et al. | Oct 2002 | B2 |
6539818 | Verhey et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6585256 | Blackwell et al. | Jul 2003 | B2 |
6651192 | Viglione et al. | Nov 2003 | B1 |
6657801 | Chue et al. | Dec 2003 | B1 |
6687093 | Butler et al. | Feb 2004 | B1 |
6751041 | Codilian et al. | Jun 2004 | B1 |
6788480 | Codilian et al. | Sep 2004 | B1 |
6791782 | Codilian et al. | Sep 2004 | B1 |
6792669 | Codilian | Sep 2004 | B2 |
6798592 | Codilian et al. | Sep 2004 | B1 |
6894861 | Codilian et al. | May 2005 | B1 |
6897393 | Codilian et al. | May 2005 | B1 |
6898044 | Chheda | May 2005 | B1 |
6943972 | Chue et al. | Sep 2005 | B1 |
7003626 | Chheda et al. | Feb 2006 | B1 |
7027242 | Terrill et al. | Apr 2006 | B1 |
7046467 | Chheda | May 2006 | B1 |
7058759 | Reiser et al. | Jun 2006 | B1 |
7072129 | Cullen et al. | Jul 2006 | B1 |
7076391 | Pakzad et al. | Jul 2006 | B1 |
7076603 | Chheda | Jul 2006 | B1 |
7136242 | Chue et al. | Nov 2006 | B1 |
7139145 | Archibald et al. | Nov 2006 | B1 |
7145744 | Clawson et al. | Dec 2006 | B1 |
7178432 | Han et al. | Feb 2007 | B1 |
7199959 | Bryant | Apr 2007 | B1 |
7203020 | Viglione et al. | Apr 2007 | B1 |
7209310 | Tsai et al. | Apr 2007 | B1 |
7222410 | Klassen et al. | May 2007 | B1 |
7236911 | Gough et al. | Jun 2007 | B1 |
7269525 | Gough et al. | Sep 2007 | B1 |
7458282 | Wuester, Sr. et al. | Dec 2008 | B1 |
7490398 | Klassen et al. | Feb 2009 | B1 |
7506553 | Panyavoravaj | Mar 2009 | B1 |
7549204 | Vangal-Ramamurthy et al. | Jun 2009 | B1 |
7552526 | Klassen et al. | Jun 2009 | B1 |
7559590 | Jones | Jul 2009 | B1 |
7561416 | Sarraf | Jul 2009 | B1 |
7596722 | Pakzad et al. | Sep 2009 | B1 |
7634375 | Pakzad et al. | Dec 2009 | B1 |
7653983 | Klassen | Feb 2010 | B1 |
7669711 | Westwood | Mar 2010 | B1 |
7671599 | Tan et al. | Mar 2010 | B1 |
7673638 | Boynton et al. | Mar 2010 | B1 |
7690705 | Roberts et al. | Apr 2010 | B1 |
7694410 | Kamigama et al. | Apr 2010 | B2 |
7743486 | Klassen et al. | Jun 2010 | B1 |
7863889 | Bamrungtham | Jan 2011 | B1 |
7869182 | Tan et al. | Jan 2011 | B1 |
7869183 | Tan et al. | Jan 2011 | B1 |
7874424 | Westwood | Jan 2011 | B1 |
7896218 | Rakpongsiri et al. | Mar 2011 | B2 |
7900272 | Tan et al. | Mar 2011 | B1 |
7912666 | Pakzad et al. | Mar 2011 | B1 |
7916599 | Panyavoravaj et al. | Mar 2011 | B1 |
7921543 | Trongjitwikrai et al. | Apr 2011 | B2 |
7940487 | Krishnan et al. | May 2011 | B1 |
7974038 | Krishnan et al. | Jul 2011 | B2 |
7980159 | Han | Jul 2011 | B1 |
7987585 | Klassen et al. | Aug 2011 | B1 |
8066171 | Rakpongsiri et al. | Nov 2011 | B1 |
8078421 | Shastry et al. | Dec 2011 | B1 |
8092610 | Tarrant | Jan 2012 | B1 |
8094414 | Cheng et al. | Jan 2012 | B1 |
8098460 | Jen et al. | Jan 2012 | B1 |
8127643 | Tan | Mar 2012 | B1 |
8135208 | Vangal-Ramamurthy | Mar 2012 | B1 |
8162366 | Tan et al. | Apr 2012 | B1 |
8168033 | Mohamad Nor | May 2012 | B1 |
8180487 | Vangal-Ramamurthy et al. | May 2012 | B1 |
8199425 | Gustafson et al. | Jun 2012 | B1 |
8218256 | Lin et al. | Jul 2012 | B1 |
8223448 | Haw et al. | Jul 2012 | B1 |
8230570 | Choong | Jul 2012 | B1 |
8245601 | Hastama et al. | Aug 2012 | B1 |
8267831 | Olsen et al. | Sep 2012 | B1 |
8270118 | Cheng et al. | Sep 2012 | B1 |
8300338 | McFadyen | Oct 2012 | B1 |
8307537 | Klassen et al. | Nov 2012 | B1 |
8312585 | Tarrant | Nov 2012 | B1 |
8322235 | Keopuang et al. | Dec 2012 | B1 |
8327529 | Tan et al. | Dec 2012 | B1 |
8335049 | Liu et al. | Dec 2012 | B1 |
8345367 | Tharumalingam | Jan 2013 | B1 |
8356384 | Ferre et al. | Jan 2013 | B1 |
8369073 | Trinh et al. | Feb 2013 | B2 |
8379363 | Kolunthavelu et al. | Feb 2013 | B1 |
8387631 | Thonghara et al. | Mar 2013 | B1 |
8424418 | Wuester, Sr. et al. | Apr 2013 | B1 |
8424824 | Tan et al. | Apr 2013 | B1 |
8432630 | Lin et al. | Apr 2013 | B1 |
8432631 | Lin et al. | Apr 2013 | B1 |
8447430 | Tan et al. | May 2013 | B1 |
8447551 | Ong et al. | May 2013 | B1 |
8451578 | Tan et al. | May 2013 | B1 |
8453841 | James et al. | Jun 2013 | B1 |
8454755 | Tan et al. | Jun 2013 | B1 |
8485772 | Ismail et al. | Jul 2013 | B1 |
8493681 | Selvaraj | Jul 2013 | B1 |
8537480 | Haw | Sep 2013 | B1 |
8544164 | Cheng et al. | Oct 2013 | B1 |
8547657 | Liu et al. | Oct 2013 | B1 |
8553968 | Lee et al. | Oct 2013 | B1 |
8561285 | Vangal-Ramamurthy et al. | Oct 2013 | B1 |
8565511 | Sungkhaphong et al. | Oct 2013 | B1 |
8582229 | Krishnan | Nov 2013 | B1 |
8596107 | Wongdao et al. | Dec 2013 | B1 |
8605383 | Wang et al. | Dec 2013 | B1 |
8640328 | Yow et al. | Feb 2014 | B1 |
8650716 | Methe et al. | Feb 2014 | B1 |
8653824 | Liu et al. | Feb 2014 | B1 |
8662554 | Srisupun et al. | Mar 2014 | B1 |
8683676 | Wuester, Sr. et al. | Apr 2014 | B1 |
8689433 | Choong | Apr 2014 | B1 |
20080084630 | Trongjitwikrai et al. | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20090157848 | Khoo | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20100108256 | Roajanasiri et al. | May 2010 | A1 |
20130057986 | Vangal-Ramamurthy et al. | Mar 2013 | A1 |
20130248545 | Thongjitti et al. | Sep 2013 | A1 |