The present application claims the benefit of priority to Japanese Patent Application No. 2020-207318 filed on Dec. 15, 2020, the disclosures of all of which are hereby incorporated by reference in their entireties.
The present disclosure relates to a hub bracket structure.
Conventionally, known hub bracket structures with a hub bracket that connects a swinging end portion of a trailing arm to a wheel carrier (hub) include a connector at a front portion of the hub bracket, which is composed of a horizontal plate that can be elastically compressed in a vehicle width direction when a lateral force is applied from outside of a wheel (for example, Japanese Patent No. 6216836 (Patent Document 1)).
According to such a hub bracket structure, toe-in control of the tire can be performed with the aforementioned connector, to improve, for example, straight-drivability of a vehicle and to improve stability during braking by increasing the equivalent cornering power.
In a conventional hub bracket structure (see, for example, Patent Document 1), however, a difference in rigidity between a front and a rear of the hub bracket is adjusted by changing a shape, a position, a size, and the like of a notch in the horizontal plate that constitutes the connector of the hub bracket, thereby the front portion of the hub bracket can be elastically deformed.
Therefore, the conventional hub bracket structure has problems such as a complicated configuration of the connector, which complicates manufacturing steps and increases manufacturing costs.
The present disclosure is intended to provide a hub bracket structure with a simpler configuration than conventional ones.
An aspect according to the present disclosure to solve the above-described problem is to provide a hub bracket structure including: a trailing arm that extends in a vehicle front-rear direction, with one end thereof axially supported by a vehicle body in a manner swingable up and down; a hub carrier that rotatably supports a wheel; and a hub bracket that connects the trailing arm and the hub carrier, wherein the hub bracket includes a bracket body that includes a mounting surface mounted with the hub carrier, and a rear connector that extends from the bracket body toward the trailing arm behind a ground contact point of the wheel, and the rear connector is extended to a position to overlap with a rear surface of the trailing arm in the front-rear direction and is joined to the rear surface of the trailing arm.
The present disclosure provides a hub bracket structure with a simpler configuration than conventional ones.
Next, a hub bracket structure of an embodiment of the present disclosure (present embodiment) will be described in detail.
The hub bracket structure of the present embodiment has amain characteristic that a rear connector of a hub bracket is extended to a position to overlap with a rear surface of a trailing arm in a front-rear direction and is joined to the rear surface of the trailing arm.
Note that front-rear and right-left directions in the following description are based on the directions of arrows illustrated in
As illustrated in
First, the trailing arms 15 extending in the front-rear direction will be described.
The trailing arms 15 are symmetrically arranged in pairs at both ends of the torsion beam, which is not illustrated in the drawing, extending in the vehicle width direction (right-left direction).
This torsion beam is assumed to be welded or otherwise joined to inner sides in the vehicle width direction of the pair of trailing arms 15 near front portions thereof.
At the front portion of the trailing arm 15, a bushing, not illustrated, is provided to serve as an axial support to a vehicle body. Also, a lower arm (not illustrated) may also be arranged on the inner side of the trailing arm 15.
A rear portion of the trailing arm 15 has a swinging end portion 18 with the front portion of the trailing arm 15 as the swinging center when a load is inputted from a road surface in the up-down direction to the rear wheel 4 (wheel) described below.
The hub carrier 2 is configured to include a hub having a plurality of stud bolts that fasten the rear wheel 4, which is not illustrated in the drawing, and a base portion that rotatably supports the hub on the hub bracket 3 described next.
The hub bracket 3 includes a bracket body 31 on which a mounting surface 31a of the hub carrier 2 is formed, and a rear connector 32 that extends from a rear portion of the bracket body 31 toward a rear surface 15a of the trailing arm 15.
The mounting surface 31a to the hub carrier 2 is formed on an outer side in the vehicle width direction of the bracket body 31 (left surface in the right-left direction in
The bracket body 31 is separated from an outer surface 15b in the vehicle width direction of the trailing arm 15 (left surface in the right-left direction in
The rear connector 32 extends from the rear portion of the bracket body 31 inward in the vehicle width direction. Specifically, a tip end portion of the rear connector 32 extending from the bracket body 31 extends to a position to overlap with the rear surface 15a of the trailing arm 15 in the front-rear direction. The tip end portion of the rear connector 32 is welded and joined to the rear surface 15a of the trailing arm 15. In other words, a joint surface J1 of the rear connector 32 to the trailing arm 15 forms a weld joint portion W.
An extension position of the rear connector 32 from the bracket body 31 in the present embodiment is not limited to the rear portion of the bracket body 31 as described above, but can be set appropriately behind a ground contact point P of the rear wheel 4 (wheel).
Note that, although not illustrated in the drawing, if the rear connector 32 extends, for example, from the vicinity of the ground contact point P of the rear wheel 4 (wheel) toward the rear surface 15a of the trailing arm 15, the rear connector 32 may be formed to extend while being inclined, curved, or formed having a stepped shape from the bracket body 31 to the rear surface 15a, in a top view of the hub bracket structure 1 illustrated in
Next, advantageous effects of the hub bracket structure 1 according to the present embodiment will be described.
In the hub bracket structure 1, the rear connector 32 of the hub bracket 3 is extended to a position to overlap with the rear surface 15a of the trailing arm 15 in the front-rear direction and is joined to the rear surface 15a of the trailing arm 15.
In the hub bracket structure 1 described above, when a lateral force is applied to the rear wheel 4 (wheel) from an outer side in the vehicle width direction when the vehicle is traveling, the rear portion of the hub bracket 3 becomes more rigid than the front portion thereof due to the rear connector 32. In other words, in the hub bracket structure, toe-in control of the tire that constitutes the rear wheel 4 (wheel) can be performed with the rear connector 32. A vehicle equipped with the hub bracket structure 1 can improve straight-drivability and stability during braking by the toe-in control.
Unlike conventional hub bracket structures (see, for example, Patent Document 1), which have complicated connectors, the hub bracket structure 1 has a simple configuration that can perform toe-in control with the aforementioned rear connector 32.
According to the hub bracket structure 1, the joint surface J1 of the rear connector 32 to the rear surface 15a of the trailing arm 15 becomes wider, and joint rigidity of the rear surface 15a of the trailing arm 15 to the rear connector 32 is increased.
In particular, when a releasing load is assumed for releasing the hub bracket 3 outward in the vehicle width direction from the trailing arm 15, the hub bracket structure 1 of the present embodiment receives this load in a shear direction at the joint surface J1 between the rear surface of the trailing arm 15 and the rear connector 32, thus exhibiting excellent joint rigidity.
Although an embodiment of the present disclosure has been described above, the present disclosure is not limited to the above-mentioned embodiment and can be implemented in various forms.
In the hub bracket structure 1 of the above-mentioned embodiment (see
As illustrated in
According to the hub bracket structure 1 according to the first modification, the front connector 33 improves joint strength of the bracket body 31 to the trailing arm 15. Meanwhile, an area of the joint surface J2 of the front connector 33 to the trailing arm 15 can be set smaller than an area of the joint surface J1 of the rear connector 32 to the rear surface 15a of the trailing arm 15. This allows the hub bracket structure 1 to have a difference in rigidity at the front and rear of the hub bracket 3 when a lateral force is applied to the rear wheel 4 (wheel) due to the difference in rigidity of the joint at the respective joint surfaces J1 and J2. The hub bracket structure 1 can perform toe-in control of the tire when such a lateral force is applied, to improve straight-drivability of the vehicle.
In addition, in the hub bracket structure 1, a connection step of the trailing arm 15 to the front connector 33 is relatively simple because the joint surface J2 between the trailing arm 15 and the front connector 33 is formed at the weld joint portion W.
Also, the hub bracket structure 1 can more reliably form an area difference in the joint surfaces J1 and J2 by forming the joint surface J2 at the weld joint portion W, and can more reliably perform toe-in control when a lateral force is applied to the rear wheel (wheel).
As illustrated in
The front connector 33 is arranged between the inner surface in the vehicle width direction of the bracket body 31 and the outer surface 15b in the vehicle width direction of the trailing arm 15, and each of both end portions thereof is fastened with a bolt B. Note that a plurality of bolts B for fastening each of both end portions may be used. Further, the joining of the front connector 33 to the trailing arm 15 and the bracket body 31 is not limited to bolt fastening, but other joining methods may be used such as welding, riveting, and caulking.
Note that the front connector 33 in the second modification has a substantially V-shape in a top view of the hub bracket structure 1 illustrated in
In other words, the hub bracket structure 1 according to the second modification differs from the hub bracket structure 1 according to the first modification in which the front connector 33 is integrally formed on the bracket body 31 illustrated in
According to the front connector 33 in the second modification, by fastening the front connector 33 to the bracket body 31 with bolts as well, rigidity on the front connector 33 side, which is the front side of the hub bracket 3, can be weakened.
Also, according to the front connector 33 in the second modification, the front connector 33 has a substantially V-shape, to be elastically compressed in the vehicle width direction when a lateral force is applied.
In other words, with the simple structure as described above, toe-in control of the tire can be performed with the hub bracket structure 1 according to the second modification when a lateral force is applied, thereby improving the straight-drivability of the vehicle.
Note that the front connector 33 illustrated in
As illustrated in
Note that the joining of the front connector 33 to the trailing arm 15 is not limited to bolt fastening, but other joining methods may be used such as welding, riveting, and caulking.
As illustrated in
As illustrated in
As illustrated in
In the hub bracket structure 1 according to the fourth modification, degree of freedom of adjusting load response characteristics to the inputted lateral force Fy and braking force Fx is increased, compared to the hub bracket structure 1 according to the third modification (see
As mentioned above, various joining methods such as bolt fastening, welding, riveting, and caulking may be used as methods to join the front connector 33 to the trailing arm 15 and bracket body 31 of the hub bracket structure 1. Among them, the bolt fastening is preferable, because toe-in control can be performed with a simple structure when a lateral force or braking force is applied, thereby improving the straight-drivability of the vehicle and stability during braking.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
JP2020-207318 | Dec 2020 | JP | national |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
8342547 | Gerrard | Jan 2013 | B2 |
9815495 | Schultz | Nov 2017 | B2 |
20020074759 | Yamamoto et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20070290474 | Inoue | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20080277893 | Murata | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20140103627 | Deckard | Apr 2014 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
3233541 | Oct 2018 | EP |
S61-87704 | Jun 1986 | JP |
2002-187416 | Jul 2002 | JP |
2007-126039 | May 2007 | JP |
2012-086642 | May 2012 | JP |
6216836 | Oct 2017 | JP |
Entry |
---|
Klaus Wallgren, Rear Suspension With Transverse Leaf Spring as Control Link, Oct. 25, 2017, Google Patents, EP 3 233 541 A1, Machine Translation (Year: 2017). |
Office Action received in corresponding Japanese application No. 2020-207318 dated Aug. 2, 2022 with English translation (6 pages). |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20220185050 A1 | Jun 2022 | US |