This application is related to U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/313,643, filed on Nov. 21, 2008, and U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/583,346, filed on Aug. 19, 2009.
The subject invention relates to a hull robot typically configured to clean and/or inspect the hull of a vessel and, in particular, to a drive module for such a hull robot.
Robots have been proposed to clean and inspect vessels and underwater structures. Such robots typically include a drive subsystem for maneuvering the robot about the vessel or structure hull. Some drive subsystems include magnetic wheels or rollers. See U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,628,271; 3,088,429; and 2,104,062. The magnetic wheels of the '271 patent are stated to provide a holding power in excess of 2,000 pounds. The motor and drive train driving these wheels provides sufficient torque to overcome the strong magnetic tractive force. For example, the motor is stated to be a 24 volt DC motor providing 400 RPM.
Other drive subsystems include rollers and some means of adhering the robot to the hull via suction. See U.S. Pat. Nos. 4,809,383; 6,102,145; and 6,053,267. Some use rollers or wheels and a magnet spaced from the hull. See U.S. Pat. Nos. 6,564,815; 3,922,991; and 3,777,834. U.S. Pat. No. 4,697,537 discloses an impeller driven by a motor urging the robot against the hull.
Magnetic tracks and tracks with magnetic shoes have also been proposed. See U.S. Pat. Nos. 3,960,229; 2,132,661; 4,690,092; and 4,890,567 all disclosing electromagnets which may be selectively energized to control the drag force exerted by the magnets. U.S. Pat. No. 5,285,601, incorporated herein by this reference, discloses a blast cleaning device with two treads each including permanent magnets which continuously apply a tractive force.
Some proposed hull cleaning robots are powered via a tether or cable connected between the robot and a power source on board the vessel. It may be advantageous, however, for a hull robot to operate more autonomously in which case the power source for the drive subsystem, cleaning brushes, and the like would be on-board the robot typically in the form of a battery or battery pack. Drive subsystems including electromagnetics are not favored because electromagnets may require too much power to operate. High voltage powerful motors for the drive subsystem are also not favored when battery power is used. At the same time, if permanent magnets are used and they provide a fairly strong tractive force, it can be difficult to engineer a suitable drive subsystem.
Co-pending U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/313,643 filed Nov. 21, 2008 by the assignee hereof proposes a robot with a battery pack charged via a turbine/generator subsystem driven by water flowing past the hull when the vessel is underway. In this manner, the hull robot can continuously clean and/or inspect the vessel hull. In such a hull robot, a permanent magnet type drive track is desired. But, as noted above, since the drive subsystem is battery powered, a mechanism to control the tractive force supplied by the permanent magnets is needed.
One embodiment features, in one aspect, a hull cleaning and/or inspection robot which is powered via fluid moving past the hull while the vessel is underway. A preferred drive module may include a plurality of permanent magnet elements constrained by a tunnel body and switchable between a shunted state and a non-shunted state. In this way, the magnets are shunted as they reach the end of their travel along the tunnel body and remain shunted until they again engage the hull to conserve battery power. In their non-shunted state, the magnets provide a sufficient tractive force to keep the hull robot on the hull of the vessel. In other embodiments, the drive module hereof may be used in conjunction with systems other than a hull cleaning and/or inspection robot.
An example of a hull robot includes a robot body, at least one drive module for maneuvering the robot about the hull, an on-board power source, and a motive subsystem for the drive module powered by the on-board power source. A plurality of permanent magnet elements are associated with the drive module and each are switchable between a non-shunted state when adjacent a hull and a shunted state when not adjacent the hull.
The motive subsystem may include at least one turbine powered by fluid moving past the hull, a generator driven by the turbine for charging the on-board power source, and a motor powered by the on-board power source driving the drive module. A typical on-board power source includes at least one battery.
In one version, each magnet element includes a diametrically polarized cylindrical magnet rotatably disposed in a housing. The preferred housing includes non-magnetic material sandwiched between ferromagnetic material. Each magnet element may further include a switch attached to the cylindrical magnet for rotating the cylindrical magnet in the housing between the shunted state and the non-shunted state.
In one example, the drive module may also include a tunnel body and each magnet element may include a carriage which maneuvers with respect to the tunnel body. The tunnel body may include opposing side tracks and the carriage then includes spaced bearings riding in the side tracks of the tunnel body. The typical tunnel body may support a drive train and each carriage is connected to the drive train. In one example, the drive train may include a chain about spaced sprockets engaging the chain. Each carriage typically includes at least one connector extending into the chain.
There may also be spaced panels supporting the tunnel body. A plurality of flexures typically may extend between each supporting panel and the tunnel body. In one example, the tunnel body is segmented and there is at least one flexure per segment. One or both panels may include a switching feature such as a closed loop groove therein. The magnet switch assemblies ride in the groove and the groove is configured to activate switch assemblies to rotate the magnets at opposing ends of the closed loop. Each magnet element may also include a protective covering.
Also featured is a drive module including a plurality of magnet elements each having a housing with non-magnetic material sandwiched between ferromagnetic material and a bore extending into the housing, a magnet rotatably disposed in the bore, and a switch assembly for rotating the magnet. A carriage for each magnet includes at least one bearing and a connector. A tunnel body includes at least one track for the bearings of the carriages. A drive train for the tunnel body is attached to the connectors of the carriages. At least one panel supports the tunnel body. The panel typically includes means for actuating the switch assemblies such as a feature in the panel actuating the switch assemblies. The feature is configured to rotate the magnet at opposing ends of the tunnel.
One drive module features a plurality of permanent magnet elements each switchable between a non-shunted state and a shunted state, a switch assembly for each magnet element rotating each permanent magnet element to change the state thereof, a tunnel body constraining the permanent magnet elements, and a drive train for driving the tunnel body with respect to the permanent magnet elements. In one example, the means drive train includes spaced wheels rotatably supported by the tunnel assembly and a flexible member about the wheels connected to the permanent magnet elements.
Thus, the subject invention in some embodiments, need not achieve all the above objectives and the claims hereof should not be limited to structures or methods capable of achieving these objectives.
Other objects, features and advantages will occur to those skilled in the art from the following description of a preferred embodiment and the accompanying drawings, in which:
Aside from the preferred embodiment or embodiments disclosed below, this invention is capable of other embodiments and of being practiced or being carried out in various ways. Thus, it is to be understood that the invention is not limited in its application to the details of construction and the arrangements of components set forth in the following description or illustrated in the drawings. If only one embodiment is described herein, the claims hereof are not to be limited to that embodiment. Moreover, the claims hereof are not to be read restrictively unless there is clear and convincing evidence manifesting a certain exclusion, restriction, or disclaimer.
Typically, switch 102 is activated to shunt magnet 120 as permanent magnet element 100 reaches the end of its travel on the hull and switch 102 is again activated to actuate magnet 120 as permanent magnet element 100 again comes into contact with the hull. In this way, power usage is minimized and yet there is still a very strong tractive force provided to keep the robot on the hull. Power usage is minimized because power is not wasted in removing the individual permanent magnet elements from the hull. Also, damage to the hull is minimized since the permanent magnet elements are not switched to their non-shorted states until they are actually in contact with the hull. Each permanent magnet element may include a protective covering to also reduce damage to the vessel hull. The intent is to control the holding force exerted by the magnets but at the same time use permanent magnets which consume no power unlike electromagnets.
Since tunnel body 106′ is fixed to robot body 10,
In one preferred design, the tunnel body performs two functions: it constrains the movement of the permanent magnet elements and also serves to house the drive mechanism (e.g., a chain about two sprockets) connected to the carriages of the permanent magnet elements. This design also provides structural support against slack in the drive assembly. The side plates also serve two functions: they flexibly support the tunnel body and they include means for actuating the switches of the permanent magnet elements. In the preferred design, the magnetic elements are switched between their minimum tractive state and their maximum tractive state irrespective of the direction of travel of the robot. These are not limitations of the subject invention, however, as other designs are possible.
Other features associated with the typical hull robot are disclosed in the patents cited in the Background section hereof and incorporated herein by this reference. Also, U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/313,643 filed Nov. 21, 2008 by the assignee hereof discloses additional features which may be associated with a hull robot. The drive module disclosed herein, however, is not limited to use in connection with such a vessel hull robot. The drive module, for example, can be used on any ferromagnetic body including but not limited to vessel hulls, underwater structures, and the like. “Hull,” as used herein, then, broadly means a structure to be traversed.
Thus, although specific features of the invention are shown in some drawings and not in others, this is for convenience only as each feature may be combined with any or all of the other features in accordance with the invention. The words “including”, “comprising”, “having”, and “with” as used herein are to be interpreted broadly and comprehensively and are not limited to any physical interconnection. Moreover, any embodiments disclosed in the subject application are not to be taken as the only possible embodiments.
In addition, any amendment presented during the prosecution of the patent application for this patent is not a disclaimer of any claim element presented in the application as filed: those skilled in the art cannot reasonably be expected to draft a claim that would literally encompass all possible equivalents, many equivalents will be unforeseeable at the time of the amendment and are beyond a fair interpretation of what is to be surrendered (if anything), the rationale underlying the amendment may bear no more than a tangential relation to many equivalents, and/or there are many other reasons the applicant can not be expected to describe certain insubstantial substitutes for any claim element amended.
Other embodiments will occur to those skilled in the art and are within the following claims.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2104062 | Temple | Jan 1938 | A |
2132661 | Temple | Oct 1938 | A |
2386650 | Bell | Oct 1945 | A |
3088429 | Johannessen | May 1963 | A |
3285676 | Hetteen | Nov 1966 | A |
3439937 | Dixon | Apr 1969 | A |
3554300 | Rosenberg | Jan 1971 | A |
3638600 | Modrey | Feb 1972 | A |
3777834 | Hiraoka et al. | Dec 1973 | A |
3922991 | Woods | Dec 1975 | A |
3934664 | Pohjola | Jan 1976 | A |
3946692 | Sierra et al. | Mar 1976 | A |
3960229 | Shio | Jun 1976 | A |
3984944 | Maasberg et al. | Oct 1976 | A |
4046429 | Pohjola | Sep 1977 | A |
4079694 | Galinou | Mar 1978 | A |
4119356 | Pohjola | Oct 1978 | A |
4135592 | Vincent | Jan 1979 | A |
4202453 | Wilkes et al. | May 1980 | A |
4251791 | Yanagisawa et al. | Feb 1981 | A |
4401048 | Rogers | Aug 1983 | A |
4574722 | Orita et al. | Mar 1986 | A |
4674949 | Kroczynski | Jun 1987 | A |
4690092 | Rabuse | Sep 1987 | A |
4697536 | Hirata | Oct 1987 | A |
4734954 | Greskovics et al. | Apr 1988 | A |
4736826 | White et al. | Apr 1988 | A |
4789037 | Kneebone | Dec 1988 | A |
4809383 | Urakami | Mar 1989 | A |
4841894 | Nellessen, Jr. | Jun 1989 | A |
4890567 | Caduff | Jan 1990 | A |
4926775 | Andorsen | May 1990 | A |
5048445 | Lever et al. | Sep 1991 | A |
5174222 | Rogers | Dec 1992 | A |
5203646 | Landsberger et al. | Apr 1993 | A |
5249631 | Ferren | Oct 1993 | A |
5253605 | Collins | Oct 1993 | A |
5253724 | Prior | Oct 1993 | A |
5285601 | Watkin et al. | Feb 1994 | A |
5366038 | Hidetsugu et al. | Nov 1994 | A |
5435405 | Schempf et al. | Jul 1995 | A |
5628271 | McGuire | May 1997 | A |
5849099 | McGuire | Dec 1998 | A |
5852984 | Matsuyama et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
5894901 | Awamura et al. | Apr 1999 | A |
5947051 | Geiger | Sep 1999 | A |
6000484 | Zoretich et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6053267 | Fisher | Apr 2000 | A |
6064708 | Sakamaki | May 2000 | A |
6102145 | Fisher | Aug 2000 | A |
6125955 | Zoretich et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6317387 | D'Amaddio et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6564815 | McGuire | May 2003 | B2 |
6595152 | McGuire | Jul 2003 | B2 |
6698376 | Delahousse et al. | Mar 2004 | B2 |
6792335 | Ross et al. | Sep 2004 | B2 |
6886486 | Van Rompay | May 2005 | B2 |
6886651 | Slocum et al. | May 2005 | B1 |
7296530 | Bernstein et al. | Nov 2007 | B1 |
7390560 | Wallach | Jun 2008 | B2 |
7520356 | Sadegh et al. | Apr 2009 | B2 |
7866421 | Moore et al. | Jan 2011 | B2 |
7934575 | Waibel et al. | May 2011 | B2 |
20030000445 | McGuire | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20040089216 | Van Rompay | May 2004 | A1 |
20040133999 | Walton | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20050027412 | Hobson et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050156562 | Cohen et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050216125 | Huston et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20060175439 | Steur et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060191457 | Murphy | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060249622 | Steele | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060261772 | Kim | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20070089916 | Lundstrom | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070276552 | Rodocker et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070284940 | Koolhiran | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20080202405 | Kern | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080276407 | Schnittman et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20080281470 | Gilbert, Jr. et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20090078484 | Kocijan | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090094765 | Osaka et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090166102 | Waibel et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090301203 | Brussieux | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20100000723 | Chambers | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100131098 | Rooney, III et al. | May 2010 | A1 |
20100217436 | Jones et al. | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100219003 | Rooney et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
3611750 | Oct 1987 | DE |
2038721 | Jul 1980 | GB |
WO 02074611 | Sep 2002 | WO |
WO 02074611 | Sep 2002 | WO |
WO 2005014387 | Feb 2005 | WO |
Entry |
---|
U.S. Appl. No. 12/313,643, filed Nov. 21, 2008, Rooney III, et al. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/583,346, filed Aug. 19, 2009, Rooney, III et al. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/586,248, filed Sep. 18, 2009, Rooney, III et al. |
Hismar Hull Identification System for Maritime Autonomous Robots, http://hismar.ncl.ac.uk/public—docs/HISMAR—Poster.pdf (1 page). |
Hismar Hismar News Report No. 2. 2008, http://hismar.ncl.ac.uk/public—docs/News—Reports/News%20Report%20No2—UNEW.pdf (4 pages). |
S. Reed, A. Cormack, K. Hamilton, I. Tena Ruiz, and D. Lane, “Automatic Ship Hull Inspection using Unmanned Underwater Vehicles,”Proceedings from the 7th International Symposium on Technology and the Mine Problem. Monterey, USA. May, 2006 (10 pages). |
Vaganay, J., Elkins, M., Espositio, D., Oapos, Halloran, W., Hover, F., Kokko, M. Ship Hull Inspection with the HAUV: US Navy and NATO Demonstrations Results, OCEANS 2006, vol., Issue, Sep. 18-21, 2006, pp. 1-6. |
Lee Min Wai Serene and Koh Cheok Wei, “Design of a Remotely Operated Vehicle (ROV) for Underwater Ship Hull Cleaning,” National University of Singapore, 2003, pp. 1-6. |
Fu-cai et al., “The Design of Underwater Hull-Cleaning Robot,” Journal of Marine Science and Application, vol. 3, No. 1, Jun. 2004, pp. 41-45. |
Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority for PCT Application No. PCT/US2009/006122 mailed Feb. 3, 2010 (seven (7) pages). |
Borchardt, John, Grooming the Fleet, Mechanical Engineering, vol. 132/No. 4 Apr. 2010, pp. 33-35. |
Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority, International Application No. PCT/US2011/000787, Jul. 20, 2011, 7 pgs. (unnumbered). |
Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority, International Application No. PCT/US2011/000770, Aug. 9, 2011, 5 pgs. (unnumbered). |
Townsin, R.L., The Ship Hull Fouling Penalty, Biofouling, Jan. 2003, vol. 19, (supplement), Jan. 1, 2003, pp. 9-15. |
Rosenhahn et al., Advanced Nanostructures for the Control of Biofouling: The FP 6 EU Integrated Project AMBIO, Biointerphases 3(1) Mar. 2008, published Feb. 21, 2008; pp. IR1-IR5. |
Preiser et al., Energy (Fuel) Conservation Through Underwater Removal and Control of Fouling on Hulls of Navy Ships, Naval Research and Development Center, Materials Department, Annapolis, Research and Development Report, Dec. 1975, 52 pgs. |
Man, B&W, Basic Principles of Ship Propulsion, Basics of Ship Propulsion, pp. 1-30, Apr. 2004. |
A Copenhagen Climate Treaty, Version 1.0 Draft, A Proposal for a Copenhagen Agreement by Members of the NGO Community, published Jun. 2009, pp. 1-78 (80 pages total). |
Yuan, et al., The Design of Underwater Hull-Cleaning Robot, Journal of Marine Science and Application, vol. 3, No. 1, Jun. 2004, pp. 41-45. |
Tallett, et al., Potential Marine Fuels Regulations: Impacts on Global Refining, Costs & Emissions, Joint IFQC & IPIECA Roundtable: Impacts of CO2 Emissions from Refining & Shipping, London, England Oct. 1, 2007, 17 pgs. |
RTI International, EnSys Energy & Systems, Inc., Navigistics Consulting; Global Trade and Fuels Assessment—Future Trends and Effects of Designating Requiring Clean Fuels in the Marine Sector: Task Order No. 1, Draft Report, RTI Project No. 0209701.001, Apr. 2006 (82 pages total). |
Anti-Fouling Systems, Focus on IMO, International Maritime Organization, UK, 2002, pp. 1-31. http://www.uscg.mil/hq/cg5/cg522/cg5224/docs/FOULING2003.pdf. |
Fernandez, Linda, NAFTA and Member Country Strategies for Maritime Trade and Marine Invasive Species, Joumal of Environmental Management 89, 2008, pp. 308-321. |
Munk, Torben, Fuel Conservation Through Managing Hull Resistance, Motorship Propulsion Conference, Copenhagen, Apr. 26, 2006 pp. 1-10. |
Kohli, Nikita, Biofouling and Design of a Biomimetic Hull-Grooming Tool, Naval Surface Warfare Center Carderock Division, West Bethesda, MD, NSWCCD-CISD-2007/002, Ship Systems Integration & Design Department Technical Report, Sep. 2007, 38 pages total. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/800,174, filed May 10, 2010, Rooney III, et al. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/800,486, filed May 17, 2010, James H. Rooney, III. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/800,174, filed May 10, 2010, James H. Rooney, III; office action issued Feb. 24, 2012. |
Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority, International Application No. PCT/US2010/002163, Oct. 13, 2010, 5 pgs. (unnumbered). |
Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority, International Application No. PCT/US2010/002164, Oct. 8, 2010, 5 pgs. (unnumbered). |
Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority, International Application No. PCT/US2010/002693, Dec. 9, 2010, 8 pgs. (unnumbered). |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/313,643, filed Nov. 21, 2008, James H. Rooney III, office action issued Apr. 13, 2012. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/586,248, filed Sep. 18, 2009, James H. Rooney III, office action issued May 24, 2012. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/800,174, filed May 10, 2010; James H. Rooney III; notice of allowance dated Aug. 17, 2012. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/313,643, filed Nov. 21, 2008; James H. Rooney III; office action dated Sep. 17, 2012. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/583,346, filed Aug. 19, 2009; James H. Rooney III; office action dated Sep. 25, 2012. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/800,486, filed May 17, 2010; James H. Rooney III; notice of allowance dated Sep. 27, 2012. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/586,248, filed Sep. 18, 2009; James H. Rooney III; notice of allowance dated Oct. 24, 2012. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20110083599 A1 | Apr 2011 | US |