This invention relates to a garage for a hull robot.
The frictional resistance of a vessel hull as it moves through the water can constitute 45% to 90% of the total resistance and may be increased by 6% up to 80% due to the fouling of the hull by algae, sea grass, barnacles, and the like. An added resistance of 30% due to moderate bio-fouling of a tanker hull can increase the fuel consumption of the vessel by twelve tons per day. The result is added cost to operate the vessel and increased emissions.
Accordingly, there are a variety of methods employed to lower the chance of bio-fouling and/or to clean the hull of vessels. For example, hull paints and coatings are used in an effort to decrease the chance of bio-fouling, but such treatments do not always work reliably. See, for example, U.S. Pat. No. 7,390,560. Also, the vessel must be dry docked for an extensive period of time while the paint and/or coating is applied. There are also environmental concerns with anti-fouling paints and coatings.
Most prior hull cleaning robots suffer from several potential shortcomings. Typically, the robots are connected to a cable and powered and controlled by an on-board power supply and control subsystem and are able to operate only on a stationary vessel.
More recently, an improved hull robot has been proposed in co-pending U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/313,643, filed Nov. 21, 2008, by Rooney et al. There is a need for a place to store the robot when it is not in use or needs maintenance routine or otherwise. This robot uses magnetic attraction to grip the hull as the robot moves about the hull. The magnets required to safely secure the moving robot to the hull, especially when the vessel is underway, must exert a substantial force. It can be difficult to remove the robot from the hull for servicing, cleaning, and or storage. It may also be difficult to move a robot from storage onto the hull. The robot is often not easily launched and/or recovered by one man or even two in an ocean going environment. So, a more reliable launch and recovery technique is required. Further, safe stowage is always a consideration for equipment on a vessel. And, again, stowage is not without difficulty because of the size and weight of the robot. In addition, from time to time, the robot may need to be brought below to a maintenance shop for repair and/or maintenance.
In one embodiment a vessel hull robot garage includes a stowage compartment on the vessel for stowing a hull robot and a rotation system configured to rotate the stowage compartment relative to the vessel between a launch/recovery attitude and a stowed position.
In a preferred embodiment the rotation system may include a rotation mechanism and a drive system. The garage may include a cleaning fluid dispenser system for cleaning the robot. The garage may include cleaning implements for cleaning the robot. The garage may include a heater system. The garage may include a charging receptacle for engaging a matching receptacle on the robot for charging the robot power supply. The garage may include a charging and communication receptacle for receiving a matching receptacle on the robot for charging the robot power supply and communicating with an on board host controller and navigation system. The robot garage may be disposed on a water borne vessel deck and the launch/recovery attitude may be generally parallel to the surface of the hull and the stowed position may be generally parallel to the deck. The garage may include a floor of magnetic material. There may be a first spacer between the magnetic material and the robot to reduce any magnetic attraction between the robot and vessel. The first spacer may be non-magnetic material. The first spacer may be a keeper plate. The rotation system may include a hinge one portion of which is fixed to the garage, the other to the vessel. The garage may enclose the robot in the stowed position. The garage may include a door driven to move toward the open position as the stowage compartment approaches the launch/recovery attitude and toward the closed position as the stowage compartment approaches the stowed position. The garage may include a service chamber including at least one of a heater, a cleaning fluid dispenser system and a cleaning implement. The garage may include a releasably connected portable suitcase chamber. The stowage compartment may include a turntable for re-orienting the hull robot relative to the stowage compartment. The turntable may include a second rotation mechanism for rotating the turntable. The second rotation mechanism may be driven by the drive system. The first and second rotation mechanisms may each include a set of gears with a common shaft driven by the drive system.
In another embodiment a vessel hull robot garage includes a stowage compartment for stowing a hull robot, a rotation system for rotating the stowage compartment relative to the vessel between a launch/recovery attitude and a stowed position, a service chamber for receiving the hull robot for servicing during stowage, and a separate, portable suitcase chamber for extracting the robot from the garage.
Other objects, features and advantages will occur to those skilled in the art from the following description of a preferred embodiment and the accompanying drawings, in which:
Aside from the preferred embodiment or embodiments disclosed below, this invention is capable of other embodiments and of being practiced or being carried out in various ways. Thus, it is to be understood that the invention is not limited in its application to the details of construction and the arrangements of components set forth in the following description or illustrated in the drawings. If only one embodiment is described herein, the claims hereof are not to be limited to that embodiment. Moreover, the claims hereof are not to be read restrictively unless there is clear and convincing evidence manifesting a certain exclusion, restriction, or disclaimer.
There is shown in
In
By releasing latches 34 in two parts indicated at 34a on mounting 32 and parts 34b on suitcase chamber 18 on the front and back of portable suitcase chamber 18, chamber 18 may be slid off,
The various functions provided by garage 10, e.g. heating, cleaning, charging portable removability have been distributed across the service 14 and suitcase 18 chambers in this particular embodiment in order to make the disclosure easier and more understandable but all of these functions could as well be provided in the stowage compartment and the service 14 and suitcase 18 chambers done away with as illustrated with respect to
The preferred synchronous operation of turntable 46 and stowage compartment 12 is shown in more detail in
Stowage compartment 12 with its cover removed is shown exploded away from the rotating mechanism 70,
The synchronous operation can be seen more readily in
A control circuit 200,
Since the magnets used by hull robot 44 may be quite strong it may be necessary or desirable to reduce the magnetic attraction between the robot and garage 10. For this purpose, for example, portable suitcase chamber 18,
While as previously explained, supra, the details of heaters, cleaning fluids and implements and charging sockets have been distributed over all three sections of the garage 10; stowage compartment 12, service chamber 14 and suitcase chamber 18, this is not a necessary limitation of the invention. Both chambers 14 and 18 are eliminated in
Thus far stowage compartments 12 and 12a have been shown substantially enclosed but that is not a necessary limitation for as shown in
Thus, although specific features of the invention are shown in some drawings and not in others, this is for convenience only as each feature may be combined with any or all of the other features in accordance with the invention. The words “including”, “comprising”, “having”, and “with” as used herein are to be interpreted broadly and comprehensively and are not limited to any physical interconnection. Moreover, any embodiments disclosed in the subject application are not to be taken as the only possible embodiments.
In addition, any amendment presented during the prosecution of the patent application for this patent is not a disclaimer of any claim element presented in the application as filed: those skilled in the art cannot reasonably be expected to draft a claim that would literally encompass all possible equivalents, many equivalents will be unforeseeable at the time of the amendment and are beyond a fair interpretation of what is to be surrendered (if anything), the rationale underlying the amendment may bear no more than a tangential relation to many equivalents, and/or there are many other reasons the applicant can not be expected to describe certain insubstantial substitutes for any claim element amended.
Other embodiments will occur to those skilled in the art and are within the following claims.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2104062 | Temple | Jan 1938 | A |
2132661 | Temple | Oct 1938 | A |
2386650 | Bell | Oct 1945 | A |
3088429 | Johannessen | May 1963 | A |
3285676 | Hetteen | Nov 1966 | A |
3439937 | Dixon | Apr 1969 | A |
3554300 | Rosenberg | Jan 1971 | A |
3638600 | Modrey | Feb 1972 | A |
3777834 | Hiraoka et al. | Dec 1973 | A |
3922991 | Woods | Dec 1975 | A |
3934664 | Pohjola | Jan 1976 | A |
3946692 | Sierra et al. | Mar 1976 | A |
3960229 | Shio | Jun 1976 | A |
3984944 | Maasberg et al. | Oct 1976 | A |
4046429 | Pohjola | Sep 1977 | A |
4079694 | Galinou | Mar 1978 | A |
4119356 | Pohjola | Oct 1978 | A |
4135592 | Vincent | Jan 1979 | A |
4202453 | Wilkes et al. | May 1980 | A |
4251791 | Yanagisawa et al. | Feb 1981 | A |
4401048 | Rogers | Aug 1983 | A |
4574722 | Orita et al. | Mar 1986 | A |
4674949 | Kroczynski | Jun 1987 | A |
4690092 | Rabuse | Sep 1987 | A |
4697536 | Hirata | Oct 1987 | A |
4734954 | Greskovics et al. | Apr 1988 | A |
4736826 | White et al. | Apr 1988 | A |
4789037 | Kneebone | Dec 1988 | A |
4809383 | Urakami | Mar 1989 | A |
4841894 | Nellessen, Jr. | Jun 1989 | A |
4890567 | Caduff | Jan 1990 | A |
4926775 | Andorsen | May 1990 | A |
5048445 | Lever et al. | Sep 1991 | A |
5174222 | Rogers | Dec 1992 | A |
5203646 | Landsberger et al. | Apr 1993 | A |
5249631 | Ferren | Oct 1993 | A |
5253605 | Collins | Oct 1993 | A |
5253724 | Prior | Oct 1993 | A |
5285601 | Watkin et al. | Feb 1994 | A |
5366038 | Hidetsugu et al. | Nov 1994 | A |
5435405 | Schempf et al. | Jul 1995 | A |
5628271 | McGuire | May 1997 | A |
5849099 | McGuire | Dec 1998 | A |
5852984 | Matsuyama et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
5894901 | Awamura et al. | Apr 1999 | A |
5947051 | Geiger | Sep 1999 | A |
6000484 | Zoretich et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6053267 | Fisher | Apr 2000 | A |
6064708 | Sakamaki | May 2000 | A |
6102145 | Fisher | Aug 2000 | A |
6125955 | Zoretich et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6317387 | D'Amaddio et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6564815 | McGuire | May 2003 | B2 |
6595152 | McGuire | Jul 2003 | B2 |
6698376 | Delahousse et al. | Mar 2004 | B2 |
6792335 | Ross et al. | Sep 2004 | B2 |
6886486 | Van Rompay | May 2005 | B2 |
6886651 | Slocum et al. | May 2005 | B1 |
7296530 | Bernstein et al. | Nov 2007 | B1 |
7390560 | Wallach | Jun 2008 | B2 |
7520356 | Sadegh et al. | Apr 2009 | B2 |
7866421 | Moore et al. | Jan 2011 | B2 |
7934575 | Waibel et al. | May 2011 | B2 |
20030000445 | McGuire | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20040089216 | Van Rompay | May 2004 | A1 |
20040133999 | Walton | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20050027412 | Hobson et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050156562 | Cohen et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050216125 | Huston et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20060175439 | Steur et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060191457 | Murphy | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060249622 | Steele | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060261772 | Kim | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20070089916 | Lundstrom | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070276552 | Rodocker et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070284940 | Koolhiran | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20080202405 | Kern | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080276407 | Schnittman et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20080281470 | Gilbert, Jr. et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20090078484 | Kocijan | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090094765 | Osaka et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090166102 | Waibel et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090301203 | Brussieux | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20100000723 | Chambers | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100131098 | Rooney, III et al. | May 2010 | A1 |
20100217436 | Jones et al. | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100219003 | Rooney, III et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
3611750 | Oct 1987 | DE |
2038721 | Jul 1980 | GB |
WO 02074611 | Sep 2002 | WO |
WO 02074611 | Sep 2002 | WO |
WO 2005014387 | Feb 2005 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority, International Application No. PCT/US2010/002163, Oct. 13, 2010, 5 pgs. (unnumbered). |
Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority, International Application No. PCT/US2010/002164, Oct. 8, 2010, 5 pgs. (unnumbered). |
Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority, International Application No. PCT/US2011/000787, Jul. 20, 2011, 7 pgs. (unnumbered). |
Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority, International Application No. PCT/US2011/000770, Aug. 9, 2011, 5 pgs. (unnumbered). |
Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority, International Application No. PCT/US2010/002693, Dec. 9, 2010, 8 pgs. (unnumbered). |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/800,174, filed May 10, 2010; James H. Rooney III; notice of allowance dated Aug. 17, 2012. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/313,643, filed Nov. 21, 2008; James H. Rooney III; office action dated Sep. 17, 2012. |
U.S. Appl. 12/587,949, filed Oct. 14, 2009; Howard R. Kornstein; office action issued May 25, 2012. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/800,174, filed May 10, 2010; James H. Rooney, III; office action issued Feb. 24, 2012. |
Townsin, R.L., The Ship Hull Fouling Penalty, Biofouling, Jan. 2003, vol. 19, (supplement), Jan. 1, 2003, pp. 9-15. |
Rosenhahn et al., Advanced Nanostructures for the Control of Biofouling: The FP6 EU Integrated Project AMBIO, Biointerphases vol. 3, No. 1 Mar. 2008, published Feb. 21, 2008; pp. IR1-IR5. |
Yuan, et al., The Design of Underwater Hull-Cleaning Robot, Journal of Marine Science and Application, vol. 3, No. 1, Jun. 2004, pp. 41-45. |
Fernandez, Linda, NAFTA and Member Country Strategies for Maritime Trade and Marine Invasive Species, Journal of Environmental Management 89, 2008, pp. 308-321. |
Munk, Torben, Fuel Conservation Through Managing Hull Resistance, Motorship Propulsion Conference, Copenhagen, Apr. 26, 2006 pp. 1-10. |
Kohli, Nikita, Biofouling and Design of a Biomimetic Hull-Grooming Tool, Naval Surface Warfare Center Carderock Division, West Bethesda, MD, NSWCCD-CISD-2007/002, Ship Systems Integration & Design Department Technical Report, Sep. 2007, 38 pages total. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/800,174, filed May 10, 2010, Rooney III, et al. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/800,486, filed May 17, 2010, James H. Rooney, III. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/313,643, Rooney et al. |
HISMAR Hull Identification System for Maritime Autonomous Robots, http://hismar.ncl.ac.uk/public—docs/HISMAR—Poster.pdf (1 page). |
HISMAR HISMAR News Report No. 2. 2008, http://hismar.ncl.ac.uk/public—docs/News—Reports/News%20Report%20Report%20No2—UNEW.pdf (4 pages). |
S. Reed, A. Cormack, K. Hamilton, I. Tena Ruiz, and D. Lane. “Automatic Ship Hull Inspection using Unmanned Underwater Vehicles,” Proceedings from the 7th International Symposium on Technology and the Mine Problem. Monterey, USA. May, 2006 (10 pages). |
Vaganay, J., Elkins, M., Espositio, D., Oapos, Halloran, W., Hover, F., Kokko, M. Ship Hull Inspection with the HAUV: US Navy and NATO Demonstrations Results, OCEANS 2006, vol., Issue, Sep. 18-21, 2006, pp. 1-6. |
Lee Min Wai Serene and Koh Cheok Wei, “Design of a Remotely Operated Vehicle (ROV) for Underwater Ship Hull Cleaning,” National University of Singapore, 2003, pp. 1-6. |
Fu-cai et al., “The Design of Underwater Hull-Cleaning Robot,” Journal of Marine Science and Application, vol. 3, No. 1, Jun. 2004, pp. 41-45. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/583,346, filed Aug. 19, 2009, Rooney III et al. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/587,949, filed Oct. 14, 2009, Komstein et al. |
Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority for PCT Application No. PCT/US2009/006122 mailed Feb. 3, 2010 (seven (7) pages). |
Borchardt, John, Grooming the Fleet, Mechanical Engineering, vol. 132/No. 4 Apr. 2010, pp. 33-35. |
U.S. Appl. 12/587,949; filed Oct. 14, 2009; Howard R. Kornstein; notice of allowance dated Sep. 21, 2012. |
U.S. Appl. 12/800486; filed May 17, 2010; James H. Rooney III; notice of allowance dated Sep. 21, 2012. |
U.S. Appl. 12/583,346; filed Aug. 19, 2009; James H. Rooney III; office action dated Sep. 25, 2012. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20110067615 A1 | Mar 2011 | US |