This invention relates to a hull structure for a semi-submersible wind power turbine platform. The invention also relates to a method for loading a set of hull structures of the above type onto a semi-submersible cargo carrying marine vessel, and to a marine vessel carrying a set of hull structures of the above type.
There is a growing interest for offshore wind power, i.e., sea-based wind power stations/turbines that produce electricity. Such a wind turbine may have a fixed underwater foundation or, in particular at water depths larger than around 50-60 m, may be arranged on a floating platform anchored to the bottom.
A floating wind power turbine platform may be of a semi-submersible type comprising a semi-submersible hull structure onto which a wind turbine tower is arranged. The hull structure is typically made up of a plurality of stabilizing buoyant columns connected by submersible buoyant pontoons or other connection members. The turbine tower is typically arranged onto one of the columns. An example of a semi-submersible wind power turbine platform is disclosed in WO2021/219787.
Platforms of this type are large constructions. For instance, each column of a 10 MW wind power turbine platform may have a height of 30 m and the distance between the columns may be 60-80 m. The total weight of the hull structure may be more than 3000 tons. The turbine tower may extend up to, say, 150 m above sea level and each turbine blade may be more than 100 m long.
A challenge in the field of offshore wind power is manufacturing, transportation and installation of the semi-submersible platforms. Towing of a platform with the wind turbine tower and blades etc. installed is complicated and challenging, and to reduce the towing distance for such a complete platform it is preferably arranged so that the turbine tower and the turbine blades etc. are installed onto the hull structure in a sheltered location relatively close to the final offshore location. A particular transportation challenge arises if the hull structure is manufactured at a construction yard located far away from the sheltered location, for instance because there is no construction yard suitable for such large and heavy hull structures available at or near the sheltered location. In such a situation the hull structures need to be transported a relatively long distance.
A further challenge with regard to semi-submersible wind power turbine platforms is to design the hull structure so that the platform becomes robust and stable also under harsh offshore conditions and so that the platform withstands many years of operation under such conditions.
A still further challenge is of course that manufacturing, transportation, installation, operation, etc. of the platform or hull structure must be cost efficient for keeping and increasing the interest for offshore wind power.
An object of this invention is to provide a hull structure for a semi-submersible wind power turbine platform where the hull structure exhibits improved properties with regard to stowing/loading onto a marine transportation vessel, which, without compromising the robustness and stableness of the hull structure, in turn provides for a more cost efficient transportation of hull structures. A further object is to provide a method for loading a set of such hull structures onto a semi-submersible cargo carrying marine vessel.
The hull structure concerns a hull structure for a semi-submersible wind power turbine platform, wherein the hull structure comprises: first, second and third buoyant stabilizing columns extending in a substantially vertical direction; and first, second and third elongated submersible buoyant pontoon structures extending in a substantially horizontal direction; wherein the hull structure has a general shape of a triangle in the horizontal plane with the first, second and third pontoon structures forming sides of the triangle.
The first pontoon structure extends between and connects the first and the second column and the first pontoon structure is connected to a lower part of each of the first and second columns. Similarly, the second pontoon structure extends between and connects the second and the third column and the second pontoon structure is connected to a lower part of each of the second and third columns. Further, the third pontoon structure extends between and connects the first and the third column at the lower parts thereof.
Each of the first, second and third pontoon structures has an upper side facing upwards. The third pontoon structure has a height that is less than that of each of the first and second pontoon structures. The third pontoon structure is arranged so that the upper side thereof is located at a lower level than the upper side of each of the first and second pontoon structures.
Thus, in short the hull structure of this disclosure resembles principally a Δ-shape in the horizontal plane with three buoyant pontoon structures forming sides of a triangle and connecting three columns located at the corners of the triangle/Δ-shape. A wind turbine tower may be arranged on one of the three columns, or alternatively on an additional column or support arranged onto the hull structure. The Δ-shape is relatively simple and provides for a good stability and robustness of the platform.
A particular arrangement of the hull structure of this disclosure is that the height of the third pontoon structure is less than that of each of the first and second pontoon structures, i.e., the thickness of the third pontoon structure in the vertical direction is less than that of each of the first and second pontoon structures. Further, the third pontoon structure is arranged so that the upper side of the third pontoon structure is located at a lower level in the horizontal direction than that of each of the first and second pontoon structures. In a typical example, the lower sides of the three pontoon structures are substantially aligned in the horizontal plane, and preferably also aligned with the lower sides of the three columns to form a substantially flat lower side of the entire hull structure (which thus can stand steady on flat ground during production). Since the height of the third pontoon structure is less than that of each of the first and second pontoon structures, it follows for such a typical hull structure example that the upper side of the third pontoon structure will be located at a lower level in the horizontal direction than the upper side of each of the first and second pontoon structures.
This particular arrangement provides for the possibility to stow a set of hull structures of the above type efficiently onto a marine transportation vessel by partly “inserting” a second hull structure (i.e., the edge of the Δ-shape where the second column is located) between the first and second pontoon structures of an adjacent first hull structure above and onto the third pontoon structure of the first hull structure. The second hull structure, when stowed this way, occupies a slightly inclined position in the horizontal plane and is supported partly by the first hull structure (the third pontoon structure and e.g., a particular support surface of the first hull structure supports the second hull structure) and partly by a deck of the marine vessel (the third pontoon structure of the second hull structure and possibly also the first and third columns thereof are located onto and supported by the deck). A row of several Δ-shaped hull structures can be stowed efficiently this way, where at least the second, third, fourth etc. hull structure in the row will occupy the slightly inclined position and where the first hull structure in the row may or may not be inclined in relation to the horizontal plane. The structure of the stowing arrangement and the procedure for achieving the stowing is explained more in detail further below.
A main effect of designing the hull structure as given above is that a higher number of platforms can be loaded onto the same marine transportation vessel, e.g., for transport between the construction yard to the sheltered location where the wind turbine is to be installed, which in turn reduces the transportation costs.
Conventional Δ-shaped hull structures are not adapted to be stowed in any particularly efficient way on marine transportation vessels. Where transportation is at all discussed, one idea seems to be to simply place a hull structure beside another hull structure onto the marine vessel, which is not efficient stowing. The three connection or pontoon structures of conventional Δ-shaped hull structures are far too large and high to allow efficient stowing of the type described above.
Another idea is to transport hull structures in an only partly assembled state that increases stowing efficiency, for instance by letting one of the pontoon structures form a separate part not yet connected to a column at each end. However, this requires advanced assembly work to be conducted after the transportation which may not be possible or at least will be complicated and costly.
As will be described further below, the hull structure of the present disclosure provides for transporting around four to five hull structures on a marine vessel that could carry only two hull structures of similar size if they were designed the conventional way and placed side by side onto the marine vessel. Since transportation of large hull structures is very costly, a significant cost-efficiency can be attained by letting the transportation vessel carry a higher number of hull structures.
That the platform, and the hull structure, is semi-submersible means that the platform/hull structure can be partly located beneath the water surface when in operation. The entire pontoon structures and parts of the columns are typically to be located beneath the surface. Anchoring/securing of the platform/hull structure to the bottom can be arranged in different ways, e.g., catenary mooring, taut-leg mooring or tendon mooring.
That a pontoon structure is arranged at the lower part of a column means that it is arranged somewhere in a lower region of the column; it does not necessarily mean that it is arranged at the lowest end part of the column. The lower region of the columns, and thus also the pontoon structures, will typically be submersed when the platform is in operation.
The width and length of the third pontoon structure may differ from that of the first and second pontoon structures.
In an embodiment, each of the first, second and third pontoon structures has a lower side facing downwards and wherein the lower sides of the first, second and third pontoon structures are substantially aligned with each other in the horizontal plane.
In an embodiment, the lower sides of the first, second and third pontoon structures are substantially aligned with downwardly facing lower sides of each of the first, second and third buoyant stabilizing columns. As mentioned above, the underside of the entire hull structure will then be substantially flat.
In an embodiment, each of the first and second pontoon structures has a lower side facing downwards and wherein the upper side of the third pontoon structure is substantially aligned with, or is located at a lower level than, the lower sides of the first and second pontoon structures.
Such platforms can be stowed in the same efficient manner as described above and may simplify the stowing operation since platforms according to this embodiment do not have to be stowed in an inclined position.
In an embodiment, the lower sides of the first and second pontoon structures are substantially aligned with a downwardly facing lower side of the second buoyant stabilizing columns. Thereby, the second column of a first platform can be placed onto and be supported by the third pontoon structure of a second platform when the platforms are stowed. To hold such a platform in a horizontal position when there is no third pontoon structure available, such as a platform located at an end of a row of similar platforms, it is possible to arrange a separate support structure beneath the second column.
In an embodiment, the lower sides of the first and second pontoon structures are substantially aligned with a (first) portion of a downwardly facing lower side of the second buoyant stabilizing column, wherein another (second) portion of the downwardly facing lower side of the second buoyant stabilizing columns is located at a lower level. Typically, the (second) portion located at the lower level is substantially aligned with the underside of the third pontoon as well as the underside of each of the first and third columns. Besides that a first platform can be stowed close to second platform with the first portion of its lower side arranged onto the third pontoon of a second platform, the second low-level portion of the lower side of the second column provides an integral support towards the ground (or vessel deck) that holds the platform in a horizontal position.
In an embodiment, the lower side of the third pontoon structure is substantially aligned with downwardly facing lower sides of each of the first and third buoyant stabilizing columns.
In an embodiment, the lower side of the third pontoon structure is substantially aligned with a portion of each of the downwardly facing lower sides of the first and third buoyant stabilizing columns, wherein another portion of the downwardly facing lower side of each of the first and third buoyant stabilizing columns is located at a higher level.
In an embodiment, the height of the third pontoon structure is less than 75%, preferably less than 50%, of the height of at least one of the first and second pontoon structures. In an example, the height of each of the first and second pontoon structures is around 7 m while the height of the third pontoon structure is around 3 m, thus less than 50% of the height of the first and second pontoon structures. In a further example, the height of the third pontoon structure is 2-4 m.
In an embodiment, the height of the third pontoon structure is at least 1 m, preferably at least 2 m or at least 3 m, smaller than the height of at least one of the first and second pontoon structures.
In an embodiment, the first, second and third pontoon structures have a substantially equal length. The hull structure can thus have the general shape of an equilateral triangle.
In an embodiment, the hull structure exhibits: i) a first angle in the horizontal plane between a central longitudinal axis of the first pontoon structure and a central longitudinal axis of the second pontoon structure; and ii) a second angle in the horizontal plane between a) a first imaginary line between a central point of the first stabilizing column and a central point of the second stabilizing column and b) a second imaginary line between the central point of the second stabilizing column and a central point of the third stabilizing column, wherein the second angle is larger than the first angle.
This means that the first and second pontoon structures do not extend along nor in parallel with the corresponding imaginary straight line between the central points of the second column and the first or third column, but that they instead extend in a direction that deviates from the direction given by the central points of the columns. That the second angle is larger than the first angle further means that the deviating direction of extension of the first and second pontoon structures is such that a straight pontoon structure may extend from an outer side part of the second column to an inner side part of the first or third column, where “outer” and “inner” refers to a central point of the hull structure in the horizontal plane, but not that the straight pontoon structure may extend from an inner side part of the second column to an outer side part of the first or third column.
The central points mentioned above correspond to the centroids of the columns at a level associated with the lower parts thereof.
An effect of arranging the hull structure so that it exhibits first and second angles according to above is that it improves the stowing efficiency further; the hull structures can be stowed even tighter. That the first and second angles and their relation actually provide for this effect is explained and shown further below.
In an embodiment, each of the first and the second pontoon structures has, at least along a major part of its length, a width that is less than a width of the lower part of the second stabilizing column. That is, the general width of the first and second pontoon structures is less than that of the second column at the part of the second column where the pontoon structures are connected. The second column may have a width that varies in the vertical direction, such as a cone. The width of the lower part of the second stabilizing column means the width in a direction perpendicular to a longitudinal axis of the respective pontoon structure. The width of the lower part of the second stabilizing column can be a diameter of the second column if it has a circular cross section or more general a distance from opposite sides if the cross section is e.g., polygonal. Typically, the first and second pontoon structures have a width that also is less than that of the first and third columns.
That the first and second pontoon structures are more narrow than the second column is particularly useful in combination with arranging the first and second angles mentioned above. These angles can then be arranged by positioning the first or second pontoon structure so that an outer side thereof, i.e., the side of the pontoon structure facing away sideways from the hull structure, is located at a first distance from an outer side of the second column while an inner side of the pontoon structure (opposite to the outer side thereof) is located at a second distance from an inner side of the second column, wherein the first distance is shorter than the second distance. The other end of the pontoon structure should then be properly positioned at the first or third column so that the second angle becomes larger than the first angle. This other end of the pontoon structure may be positioned centrally in relation to the first or third column or, to increase the difference between first and second angles, be positioned closer to an inner side of the first or third column.
In an embodiment, each of the first and second pontoon structures has an outer side facing away sideways from the hull structure, wherein the outer side of at least one of the first and second pontoon structures is substantially aligned with an outer side of the second stabilizing column. The outer side of the pontoon structure may thus be substantially tangential with a bent side surface section of the second column (if e.g., having a circular cross section) or be substantially aligned with a planar surface section of the second column (if having e.g., a polygonal cross section).
This embodiment may be combined with arranging the other end of the pontoon structure at the first or third column close to or substantially aligned with the inner side of the first or third column. This gives a large difference between the first and second angles and improves stowing efficiency.
In an embodiment, each of the first and second pontoon structures has an outer side facing away sideways from the hull structure and an inner side facing inwards towards the hull structure, wherein at least one of the first and second pontoon structures is arranged such that the outer side thereof is located closer to a corresponding outer side of the second stabilizing column than the inner side thereof is located in relation to a side of the second stabilizing column opposite the outer side of the second stabilizing column.
A pontoon structure arranged this way is thus not centrally arranged onto the second column but arranged closer to the outer side thereof. The outer side of the pontoon structure may be substantially aligned with the outer side of the second stabilizing column to increase the difference between the first and second angles. However, fixation of the pontoon structure to the column is typically simplified if there is some distance between the outer side of the pontoon structure and the column, i.e., if the outer sides of the pontoon structure and the column are not fully aligned. A further reason for not fully aligning the outer sides of the pontoon structure and the second column is that it may be that some distance is desired between the first and second pontoon structures of adjacent hull structures stowed onto a transportation vessel.
In an embodiment, at least an outer part of a lower side of the third pontoon structure is inclined in relation to the horizontal plane, wherein the inclination is arranged so that the outer part of the lower side of the third pontoon structure is located on a higher vertical level than an inner part of the lower side of the third pontoon structure, wherein the inner part is located closer to the second stabilizing column than the outer part.
An inclined surface is thus provided on the lower side of the third pontoon structure which is useful for providing support for the hull structure when stowed onto the marine vessel in the slightly inclined position. The inclination of the support surface should correspond to the inclined position of the stowed hull structure. The exact measure of this inclination depends on the exact measures of the hull structure and it typically varies depending on e.g., size and type of hull structure. An inclination angle in the interval 5-15° is believed to be useful in most applications. Possibly, 8-10° is a suitable interval.
In an embodiment, at least a part of a lower side of the first and third stabilizing columns is inclined in relation to the horizontal plane, wherein the inclination is arranged to correspond to the inclination of the lower side of the third pontoon structure. If the first and third columns are located onto the deck of the transportation vessel, the hull structure is better supported if also the first and third columns are provided with an inclined support surface. Depending on the size of the hull structures and the width of the transportation vessel, it may be that the first and third columns become located outside of the deck, on opposite sides thereof, when the hull structures are arranged onto the vessel. In such situations it may still be an advantage in providing the first and third columns with inclined support surfaces as it may simply manufacture (since it may be easier to connect surfaces that have the same inclination).
In an embodiment, the upper side of the third pontoon structure is inclined in relation to the horizontal plane, wherein the inclination is arranged so that an outer part of the upper side of the third pontoon structure is located on a lower vertical level than an inner part of the upper side of the third pontoon structure, wherein the inner part is located closer to the second stabilizing column than the outer part. This forms an inclined support surface on the upper side of the third pontoon structure. It is an advantage if at least a first hull structure in a row of hull structures to be stowed onto a marine transportation vessel is provided with such an inclined support surface since this allows the first hull structure to positioned horizontally onto the vessel while still providing an inclined support surface for the next hull structure in the row. The lower side of the third pontoon structure may in this embodiment be horizontal.
As mentioned above for the inclined support surface on the lower side, also the inclination of the upper support surface should correspond to the inclined position of the stowed hull structure, i.e., the “next” hull structure. Again, the inclination may be 5-15°, or 8-10°. The “next” hull structure and further hull structures along the row will not be inclined in relation to each other and therefore it may not be any advantage in providing more than one hull structure in one set or row of hull structures with an inclined support surface on the upper side of the third pontoon structure.
As an alternative, the first hull structure in the row may be arranged in an inclined position using special supports arranged onto the deck of the vessel. In such a case it may not be any advantage in providing any of the hull structures in one set or row of hull structures with an inclined support surface on the upper side of the third pontoon structure.
In an embodiment, the hull structure comprises a supporting structure arranged at the second stabilizing column between the first and second pontoon structures. This supporting structure may be adapted to both strengthen the hull structure as a whole as well as to provide a support surface for the second column of a further hull structure stowed at and partly onto the hull structure provided with the supporting structure.
The supporting structure is preferably provided with a supporting surface arranged at substantially the same vertical height as the upper side of the third pontoon structure. The supporting surface will thus be located below the upper sides of the first and second pontoon structures. The combination of i) such a supporting surface at the second column between lower parts of the first and second pontoon structures and ii) the upper side of the third pontoon structure form together a good support for the further hull structure stowed at and partly onto the hull structure provided with the supporting structure.
In an embodiment, the hull structure comprises a controllable ballast system configured to allow control of an inclination of the hull structure when floating in water. Besides that a controllable ballast system is useful during operation of the semi-submersible wind power turbine platform, it is useful when arranging a set of hull structures in a row before loading them onto a marine transportation vessel as further described below.
The invention also relates to a method for loading a set of hull structures onto a semi-submersible cargo carrying marine vessel configured to be lowered partly below the water surface into a lower position and be raised to an upper position so as to load onto the vessel cargo that is located at the water surface above the vessel, wherein the set of hull structures comprises at least a first and a second hull structure of the above type. Marine vessels of this type are known as such. During transport the hull structures are located above the water surface.
The method comprises: providing the set of hull structures floating in water; arranging the set of hull structures in a row above the marine vessel when the marine vessel is in its lower position; and raising the marine vessel to its upper position so as to load the row of hull structures onto the marine vessel.
In an embodiment, the step of arranging the set of hull structures in the row comprises: arranging the first and second hull structures adjacent each other and so that the second hull structure is located above the third pontoon structure of the first hull structure with the second column of the second hull structure positioned between the first and second pontoon structures of the first hull structure, wherein the second column of the second hull structure is positioned closer to the second column of the first hull structure than to the first and third columns of the first hull structure.
In an embodiment the method comprises: setting (e.g., ballasting) at least one of the first and second hull structures in an inclined position so as to allow the second hull structure to float above the third pontoon structure of the first hull structure into position adjacent the first hull structure.
As an example, the first hull structure may be positioned more or less horizontally and loaded to a slightly deeper draught while the second hull structure may be set in an inclined position so that the third pontoon structure becomes located at some distance below the water surface and so that the second column of the second hull structure is raised with its lower side located close to the water surface. Such an inclination may be provided by using a controllable ballast system arranged onto the hull structure. After having towed the second hull structure in position close to the first hull structure, the two hull structures may be fixed to each other. A third hull structure to be located adjacent the second hull structure in the row can be set in a similar inclined position, towed into place and be fixed to the second hull structure. A similar procedure can be used for e.g., a fourth and a fifth hull structure to form a row of five hull structures.
In an embodiment, the first hull structure in the row is provided with a supporting structure arranged at the second stabilizing column between the first and second pontoon structures, as described above, wherein the method comprises: locating the second column of the second hull structure onto the supporting structure of the first hull structure. As mentioned above, the supporting structure may include a supporting surface located at the same height as the upper side of the third pontoon structure. Preferably, all hull structures in the set of hull structures are provided with such a supporting structure. The method may then comprise: locating the second column of the second hull structure onto the supporting surface of the first hull structure, and: locating the first and second pontoon structures of the second hull structure onto the upper side of the third pontoon structure of the first hull structure. The second hull structure can then be supported by the support surface and the third pontoon structure of the adjacent first hull structure. When the hull structures are loaded onto the vessel, the second structure is then supported also by its own third pontoon structure that is located onto the deck of the vessel.
In an embodiment, the first hull structure in the row is provided with an inclined support surface on the upper side of the third pontoon structure as described above. The first hull structure can then be arranged horizontally onto the vessel while still providing a properly inclined support surface. An additional support member may be used to provide good support for the next hull structure in the row.
In an embodiment, the second hull structure in the row provided with an inclined support surface on the lower side of the third pontoon structure (and possibly also the lower sides of the first and third columns) as described above. The second hull structure can then be positioned in a slightly inclined position onto the vessel with a properly inclined support surface facing the deck of the vessel. The first and second pontoon structures of the second hull structure can be positioned onto and supported by the third pontoon structure of the adjacent first hull structure. Further, the second column of the second hull structure can be positioned onto and be supported by a support surface of the first hull structure close to the second column of the first hull structure.
In an embodiment, the step of arranging the set of hull structures in the row comprises: arranging the first and second hull structures adjacent each other and so that the first and second pontoon structure of the second hull structure is located above the third pontoon structure of the first hull structure with the second column of the second hull structure positioned between the first and second pontoon structures of the first hull structure, wherein the second column of the second hull structure is positioned closer to the second column of the first hull structure than to the first and third columns of the first hull structure.
The invention also relates to a marine vessel carrying a set of hull structures, wherein the set of hull structures comprises at least a first and a second hull structure of the above type.
In an embodiment, the set of hull structures are arranged in a row with the first and second hull structures located adjacent each other, wherein the second hull structure is located above (onto) the third pontoon structure of the first hull structure with the second column of the second hull structure positioned between the first and second pontoon structures of the first hull structure, wherein the second column of the second hull structure is positioned closer to the second column of the first hull structure than to the first and third columns of the first hull structure.
In an embodiment, the second column of the second hull structure is located onto, and supported by, the above mentioned supporting surface of the first hull structure.
When loaded onto the vessel, at least a third hull structure in the row of hull structures is supported by the support surface and upper side of the third pontoon structure of an adjacent hull structure as well as by its own third pontoon structure that is located onto the deck of the vessel.
In the description of the invention given below reference is made to the following figure, in which:
As an example of size, the columns 1, 2, 3 may have a height of around 30-35 m and a diameter of around 13 m. Each of the pontoon structures 11, 12, 13 may have a length of around 50-70 m and a width of 6-10 m. The height of the first and second pontoon structures 11, 12 may have a height of 6-9 m.
The first pontoon structure 11 extends between and connects the first and the second column 1, 2, and the first pontoon structure 11 is connected to a lower part 1c, 2c of each of the first and second columns 1, 2. The second pontoon structure 12 extends between and connects the second and the third column 2, 3, and the second pontoon structure 12 is connected to a lower part 2c, 3c of each of the second and third columns 2, 3. The third pontoon structure 13 extends between and connects the first and the third column 1, 3, and the third pontoon structure 13 is connected to a lower part 1c, 3c of each of the first and third columns 1, 3. The lower parts 1c, 2c, 3c of the columns 1, 2, 3 are in this case the lowest possible part of the columns. All three pontoon structures 11, 12, 13 are in this case buoyant pontoon structures.
Each of the first, second and third pontoon structures 11, 12, 13 has a lower side 11b, 12b, 13b facing downwards. These lower sides 11b, 12b, 13b are substantially aligned with each other in the horizontal plane and also with downwardly facing lower sides 1b, 2b, 3b of each of the first, second and third buoyant stabilizing columns 1, 2, 3.
Further, each of the first and the second pontoon structures 11, 12, has a width that is less than a width of the lower part 2c of the second stabilizing column 2. As shown in
As can be seen in
In the example shown the height of the third pontoon structure 13 is around 3 m, whereas the height of the first and second pontoon structures 11, 12 is around 7 m. The height of the third pontoon structure 13 is thus less than 50% of the first and second pontoon structures 11, 12.
The hull structure 10 is further provided with a controllable ballast system (not shown in figures) configured to allow control of an inclination of the hull structure 10 when floating in water.
The embodiments of the hull structures shown in
As shown in
As shown in
The hull structure 20 is further provided with a supporting structure 5 arranged at the second stabilizing column 2 between the first and second pontoon structures 11, 12. The supporting structure 5 connects the first and second pontoon structures 11, 12 and also the entire hull structure 20. The supporting structure 5 comprises a supporting surface 6 extending between the first and second pontoon structures 11, 12 at a height corresponding to that of the upper side 13a of the third pontoon structure 13. The supporting surface 6 functions as a support for an adjacent hull structure when stowing a set of hull structures onto a transportation vessel, as will be further described below.
The hull structure 20 is further provided with braces 7 that extend between and connect the columns 1, 2, 3 in a principally similar way as the pontoon structures 11, 12, 13, but the braces are arranged between upper parts of the columns 1, 2, 3. The brace between the first and third columns 1, 3 is not mounted when the hull structure is (to be) stowed for transport since it would obstruct close stowage. End parts of that bracing might be prefixed to the first and third columns, and the remaining part can be mounted after transport. Assembling of a brace after transport is generally not too complicated.
A further difference between the hull structures of
As shown in
This further increased difference between the second angle β and the first angle α further improves the capability of the hull structure 30 to be stowed in a space-efficient manner onto the marine transportation vessel.
As shown in
This means that the special hull structure 40 can and should be placed horizontally onto the deck 65 and form an end structure (the “first” structure) in the row of hull structures as shown in
The row of hull structures in
A method for loading the set of hull structures 40, 30a-30d onto the semi-submersible cargo carrying marine vessel 60 comprises in general the following steps:
As shown in
As shown in
As shown in
Remaining hull structures 30b, 30c, 30d are arranged in the row in principally the same way as described above for the first and second hull structures 40, 30a. For instance, the third hull structure 30b in the row is set in the inclined position and moved/towed into position at the adjacent second hull structure 30a that already is positioned in a corresponding inclined position. Since the second and third hull structures 30a, 30b are not inclined in relation to each other, there is no need for the additional support 67. As already described above, the third hull structure 30b is supported (or will be supported when the vessel 60 is raised) by the third pontoon structure 13 and the support surface 6 of the second hull structure 30a. The third hull structure 30b is also supported by its own third pontoon structure that is located onto the deck 65. The procedure for arranging the fourth and fifth hull structure 30c, 30d in the row is similar.
The hull structures 40, 30a-30d are preferably fixed to each other before raising the vessel 60. Wood elements or similar may be placed between the hull structures to prevent damages.
The difference between designs A-C is the position of the first and second pontoon structures: in design A they are positioned at the inside of the columns (
Design D forms an example of hull structures where β>α, similar to the hull structure 30 shown in e.g.,
All designs A-D have the same column diameters and pontoon structure breadth/width.
As show in
Thin lines in
In the hull structure 50 shown in
In the hull structure 51 shown in
To hold a hull structure according to
A hull structure according to
A hull structure according to
A hull structure according to
Also in the embodiments of
In the hull structure shown in
The invention is not limited by the embodiments described above but can be modified in various ways within the scope of the claims. For instance, the cross section of the columns and pontoon structures may be different than exemplified, such as polygonal columns and circular or polygonal pontoon structures.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2250021-9 | Jan 2022 | SE | national |
2250022-7 | Jan 2022 | SE | national |
2250023-5 | Jan 2022 | SE | national |
2250024-3 | Jan 2022 | SE | national |
2250755-2 | Jun 2022 | SE | national |
202211037940.9 | Aug 2022 | CN | national |
2251139-8 | Sep 2022 | SE | national |
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
PCT/EP2022/078156 | 10/10/2022 | WO |