Hush disable feature for photoelectric smoke alarm

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 6642849
  • Patent Number
    6,642,849
  • Date Filed
    Tuesday, December 11, 2001
    23 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, November 4, 2003
    21 years ago
Abstract
A hush mode disabling device for a smoke alarm having a self-test function, a hush mode that engages upon activation of the self-test function to silence or desensitize the smoke alarm for a predetermined period of time, and a remote self-test controller. An improvement includes a hush mode disabler for determining whether the self-test function has presently been activated by the remote self-test controller and for disabling the hush mode if the self-test function has presently been activated by the remote self-test controller.
Description




FIELD OF THE INVENTION




The present invention relates to a hush mode disabling circuit for a self contained smoke alarm that is connected to a remote fire alarm system.




BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION




Smoke alarms often experience false alarms as a result of smoke produced from cooking, smoking and other non-threatening situations. Thus, it is desirable to be able to temporarily disable or desensitize a smoke alarm under such false-alarm conditions.




For this purpose, many modern smoke alarms include what is referred to as a silencing feature or hush mode. Typically, smoke alarms include a test button to allow a user to initiate a self-test function to assure the smoke alarm is working properly. In order to simplify smoke alarm construction and operation, many manufacturers have incorporated the hush mode into the test button. As such, when the test button is depressed, the smoke alarm will go into a silent or decreased sensitivity mode for a predetermined period of time, after which the smoke alarm will rearm itself in its normal operating mode.





FIG. 1

shows a typical photoelectric smoke alarm chip


100


, Model No. A5358CA or A5366CA manufactured by Allegro Microsystems, Inc., connected to external circuitry with which it would normally be used. The entire circuit is contained within a smoke alarm enclosure


102


. A power source


104


is provided to provide V


DD


and V


SS


(ground) for the circuit and the chip


100


.




The enclosure


102


is provided with a smoke chamber


106


in which a infrared emitting diode


108


and an infrared photo diode


110


are contained. The emitting diode


108


is connected between pin


6


of the chip


100


and V


DD


of the circuit. The emitting diode


108


is driven by a oscillator and timing circuit


112


provided on the chip


100


. The detecting diode


110


is connected between pin


3


of the chip


100


and V


DD


of the circuit. The output of the detecting diode


110


is amplified by a photoelectric amplifier


114


provided on the chip


100


. The output of the photo amp


114


is fed to a logic circuit


116


provided to the chip


100


.




When smoke particles enter the smoke chamber


106


, the particles cause the light emitted by the emitting diode


108


to be diffracted before it is received by the detecting diode


110


. The logic circuit


116


of the chip


100


detects this diffraction and, when appropriate, causes a horn driver


118


provided on the chip


100


to drive an external horn


120


which generates and audible alarm.




A momentary push button


122


connected between V


DD


and pin


16


of the chip


100


, when pressed, causes the chip


100


to test the smoke alarm circuit and drive the horn


120


if the circuit is functioning properly.




To avoid false alarms, a hush mode is provided to the chip


100


. To utilize the hush mode, a voltage divider VD comprising two resistors R


1


, R


2


is connected between the power source


104


and pin


4


of the chip


100


. A ratio of the voltage provided by the voltage divider VD and V


DD


sets a decreased sensitivity level of the smoke alarm circuit when hush mode is active. Whenever the push-button


122


is pressed, hush mode is activated for a predetermined period of time. To disable the hush mode entirely, the voltage VD provided to pin


15


of the chip


100


must be set to V


SS


. In this way, the hush mode is either permanently enabled or permanently disabled, depending upon the circuit configuration.




In recent years, there has been a need to provide inexpensive centralized fire alarm systems. In order to do this, many manufacturers have taken inexpensive individual smoke alarms and linked them together to form a centralized system. One of the features of these systems is the ability to perform a self-test of all of the smoke alarms in the system simultaneously from a centralized or remote location.




However, when smoke alarms having the hush mode described above enabled are used in such a network system, the activation of a remote self-test will engage the hush mode. As a result, all of the smoke alarms will be silenced or have reduced sensitivity for a period of time. During this time period, the areas protected by the smoke alarms will be at an increased risk of an undetected fire hazard. Further, the occupants of the individual areas may not be aware of the reduced sensitivity of the smoke alarm. Thus, it would be desirable to provide a means for selectively disabling and enabling the hush mode of this type of smoke alarm.




BRIEF SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION




To overcome the disadvantages of the prior described above, the present invention provides a circuit for disabling the hush mode of a smoke alarm during a remote test. According to an aspect of the present invention, a hush mode disabling device for a smoke alarm having a self-test function, a hush mode that engages upon activation of the self-test function to silence or desensitize the smoke alarm for a predetermined period of time, and a remote self-test controller is provided. An improvement comprises a hush mode disabler for determining whether the self-test function has presently been activated by the remote self-test controller and for disabling the hush mode only if the self-test function has presently been activated by the remote self-test controller.











BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWING





FIG. 1

is a schematic view of a prior art integrated circuit smoke alarm chip and a typical circuit with which it may be used;





FIG. 2

is a schematic view of a network of integrated circuit smoke alarm; and





FIG. 3

is a schematic view of a hush mode disable circuit according to the present invention.











DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION




As mentioned above and shown in

FIG. 1

, smoke alarm circuits contained within a single integrated circuit package are readily available from a variety of manufacturers.




These integrated circuit smoke alarms, such as the Allegro A5358CA or A5366CA, are designed to be self sufficient. As shown in

FIG. 2

, however, due to their increasing economy, multiple integrated circuit smoke alarms


100


are sometimes networked together to form a economical multiple-point fire alarm system


124


. When used in such a configuration, the individual integrated circuit smoke alarms


100


are connected to a central remote station


126


where they can be monitored simultaneously and their self-test functions activated remotely.




Thus, when a smoke alarm is used in such a networked configuration and connected to a remote self test activation means, it would be useful to be able to selectively enable the hush mode. When a self test is activated remotely, it is desirable to not activate the hush mode of the smoke alarm so that the smoke alarm is not desensitized without local occupants being aware. However, it is also desirable for the hush mode to be available for local activation by pressing the test button, for situations such as false alarms when the hush mode would normally be used.




The present invention provides a remote hush disabling means for disabling the hush mode when the self-test is initiated be the remote station


126


.




As an embodiment of the present invention,

FIG. 3

shows a hush mode disable circuit


10


designed to work with the Allegro A5358CA or A5366CA photoelectric smoke alarm integrated circuit


100


, that is connected in a network configuration as shown in FIG.


2


. The chip


100


and the hush mode disable circuit


10


are contained within the smoke alarm enclosure


102


. The remote station


126


is external to and remote from this enclosure


102


.




In order to function, the chip


100


requires additional circuitry which is well known in the prior art. One example of such circuitry is shown in FIG.


1


.




In operation, the chip


100


goes into a decreased sensitivity or hush mode for a period of ten minutes after a test button


122


, shown in

FIG. 1

, connected to self-test input pin


16


of the chip


100


is pressed, thereby shorting pin


16


to V


DD


, which is normally 9 VDC. The level of reduced sensitivity during hush mode is set externally to the chip


100


by connecting a hush mode sensitivity level configuration input pin


15


to the junction of a voltage divider network


20


of two resistors (R


1


, R


2


) connected between V


DD


and pin


4


of the chip


100


. When pin


15


of the chip


100


is connected directly to ground, the hush mode is set to function at the full sensitivity of the chip


100


, and thus the hush mode is effectively disabled.




In order to disable the hush mode of the chip


100


only during a remote activation of the test function, the hush mode disable circuit


10


is provided with a transistor Q


1


(FIG.


3


). The base Q


1


B of the transistor Q


1


is connected through a diode D


1


to a remote test control circuit


30


contained within the remote station


126


. The collector Q


1


C is connected to pin


15


of the chip


100


and the emitter Q


1


E is connected to ground.




In order to remotely activate the test function of the chip


100


, a remote test function driver circuit


40


is provided. The driver circuit


40


comprises a transistor Q


2


. The base Q


2


B is connected to the remote test control circuit


30


through a diode D


2


. The collector Q


2


C is connected to V


DD


and the emitter Q


2


E is connected to pin


16


of the chip


100


.




When the remote circuit


30


causes voltage at the cathode of the diode Dl of the hush mode disable circuit


10


to go from approximately 0 VDC to 9 VDC, the transistor Q


1


turns on and causes pin


15


of the chip


100


to be effectively shorted to ground, thereby disabling the hush mode. At the same time, the remote circuit


30


causes voltage at the cathode of the diode D


2


of the remote test function driver circuit


40


to go to approximately 9 VDC, turning the transistor Q


1


on, which causes pin


16


of the chip


100


to be effectively shorted to V


DD


, thereby activating the test function.




When the push-button


122


is pressed, pin


16


of the chip


100


is shorted to V


DD


, and the self test is activated without disabling the hush mode. In this way, the test function can be locally activated and the hush mode enabled for a period of ten minutes each time the push button is pressed.




As alternatives to the circuit


10


described above, the hush disabler of the present invention could comprise means such as an integrated circuit, one or more mechanical relays, diode logic gates, a silicon-controlled rectifier (SCR), an additional connection from the remote test control circuit


30


, or any other means that would be appreciated by one of ordinary skill in the art as sufficient to perform the described object of the present invention. Although particular embodiments of the invention have been described in detail, it is understood that the invention is not limited correspondingly in scope, but includes all changes and modifications coming within the spirit and terms of the claims appended hereto.



Claims
  • 1. A hush mode disabling device for a smoke alarm having a self-test function, a hush mode that engages upon activation of the self-test function to silence or desensitize the smoke alarm for a predetermined period of time, and a remote self-test controller, wherein an improvement comprises:a hush mode disabler for determining whether the self-test function has presently been activated by the remote self-test controller and for disabling the hush mode if the self-test function has presently been activated by the remote self-test controller.
  • 2. The hush mode disabling device of claim 1, wherein the hush mode disabler comprises a semiconductor transistor.
  • 3. The hush mode disabling device of claim 2, wherein the semiconductor transistor is an NPN-type transistor.
  • 4. The hush mode disabling device of claim 2, wherein the semiconductor transistor comprises:a collector connected to a hush mode sensitivity level configuration input provided on the smoke alarm; an emitter connected to a fixed voltage level; and a base connected to the remote self-test controller wherein, when the remote self-test controller energizes the base of the transistor, the fixed voltage level is seen on the hush mode sensitivity level configuration input, causing the hush mode to be substantially disabled.
  • 5. The hush mode disabling device of claim 4, wherein the fixed voltage level is set at circuit ground.
  • 6. A self-contained smoke alarm connected to a centralized fire alarm system, comprising:a self-test function; a self-test button for activating the self-test function; a hush mode, whereby the self-contained smoke alarm is desensitized for a predetermined period of time after the self-test function is activated; a remote self-test controller, whereby the self-test function of the self-contained smoke alarm can be activated through the centralized fire alarm system from a location remote to the self-contained smoke alarm; and a remote hush disabling means for disabling the hush mode when the self-test function is activated by the remote self-test controller.
  • 7. The self-contained smoke alarm of claim 6, wherein the hush mode disabling means comprises a semiconductor transistor.
  • 8. The self-contained smoke alarm of claim 7, wherein the semiconductor transistor is an NPN-type transistor.
  • 9. The self-contained smoke alarm of claim 7, wherein the semiconductor transistor comprises:a collector connected to a hush mode sensitivity level configuration input provided on the self-contained smoke alarm; an emitter connected to a fixed voltage level; and a base connected to the remote self-test controller wherein, when the remote self-test controller energizes the base of the transistor, the fixed voltage level is seen on the hush mode sensitivity level configuration input, causing the hush mode to be substantially disabled.
  • 10. The hush mode disabling device of claim 9, wherein the fixed voltage level is set at circuit ground.
  • 11. A hush mode disabling circuit for a smoke alarm having a hush mode connected to a remote self-test controller, the disabling circuit comprising:a collector connected to a hush mode sensitivity level configuration input provided on the smoke alarm; an emitter connected to a fixed voltage level; and a base connected to the remote self-test controller wherein, when the remote self-test controller energizes the base of the transistor, the fixed voltage level is seen on the hush mode sensitivity level configuration input, causing the hush mode to be substantially disabled.
  • 12. A smoke alarm with a hush mode comprising:a smoke alarm; a smoke alarm self-test means for performing a self-test of the operation of the smoke alarm; a remote self-test controlling means for activating the self-test means from a remote location; a hush means for disabling or desensitizing the smoke detection means for a predetermined period of time after the self-test means has been activated; and a hush disabling means for deactivating the hush means when the self-test means has been activated by the remote self-test activation means.
US Referenced Citations (11)
Number Name Date Kind
4595914 Siegel Jun 1986 A
4792797 Tanguay et al. Dec 1988 A
5093651 Thomas Mar 1992 A
5410299 Hard Apr 1995 A
5422629 Minnis Jun 1995 A
5568129 Sisselman et al. Oct 1996 A
5686885 Bergman Nov 1997 A
5705979 Fierro et al. Jan 1998 A
5777550 Maltby et al. Jul 1998 A
5815066 Pumilia Sep 1998 A
5905438 Weiss et al. May 1999 A