The present invention relates to bioprosthetics and particularly to the use of bioprosthetics for the repair and replacement of connective tissue. More particularly, the present invention relates to the use of a composite bioprosthetic device made up of a synthetic portion and heterologous animal tissue.
Currently there are multiple patents and publications which describe in detail the characteristics and properties of small intestine submucosa (SIS). See, for example, U.S. Pat. Nos. 4,352,463, 4,902,508, 4,956,179, 5,281,422, 5,372,821, 5,445,833, 5,516,533, 5,573,784, 5,641,518, 5,645,860, 5,668,288, 5,695,998, 5,711,969, 5,730,933, 5,733,868, 5,753,267, 5,755,791, 5,762,966, 5,788,625, 5,866,414, 5,885,619, 5,922,028, 6,056,777, and WO 97/37613, incorporated herein by reference. SIS, in various forms, is commercially available from Cook Biotech Incorporated (Bloomington, Ind.). Further, U.S. Pat. No. 4,400,833 to Kurland and PCT publication having International Publication Number WO 00/16822 provide information related to bioprosthetics and are also incorporated herein by reference.
It is also known to use naturally occurring extracellular matrices (ECMs) to provide a scaffold for tissue repair and regeneration. One such ECM is small intestine submucosa (SIS). SIS has been used to repair, support, and stabilize a wide variety of anatomical defects and traumatic injuries. Commercially-available SIS material is derived from porcine small intestinal submucosa that remodels the qualities of its host when implanted in human soft tissues. Further, it is taught that the SIS material provides a natural matrix with a three-dimensional microstructure and biochemical composition that facilitates host cell proliferation and supports tissue remodeling. SIS products, such as Oasis material and Surgisis material, are commercially available from Cook Biotech, Bloomington, Ind.
An SIS product referred to as RESTORE Orthobiologic Implant is available from DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. in Warsaw, Ind. The DePuy product is described for use during rotator cuff surgery, and is provided as a resorbable framework that allows the rotator cuff tendon to regenerate itself. The RESTORE Implant is derived from porcine small intestine submucosa that has been cleaned, disinfected, and sterilized. Small intestine submucosa (SIS) has been described as a naturally-occurring ECM composed primarily of collagenous proteins. Other biological molecules, such as growth factors, glycosaminoglycans, etc., have also been identified in SIS. See Hodde et al., Tissue Eng. 2(3): 209-217 (1996); Voytik-Harbin et al., J. Cell Biochem., 67:478-491 (1997); McPherson and Badylak, Tissue Eng., 4(1): 75-83 (1998); Hodde et al., Endothelium, 8(1):11-24 (2001); Hodde and Hiles, Wounds, 13(5): 195-201 (2001); Hurst and Bonner, J. Biomater. Sci. Polym. Ed., 12(11) 1267-1279 (2001); Hodde et al., Biomaterial, 23(8): 1841-1848 (2002); and Hodde, Tissue Eng., 8(2): 295-308 (2002), all of which are incorporated by reference herein. During seven years of preclinical testing in animals, there were no incidences of infection transmission form the implant to the host, and the SIS material has not decreased the systemic activity of the immune system. See Allman et al., Transplant, 17(11): 1631-1640 (2001); Allman et al., Tissue Eng., 8(1): 53-62 (2002).
While small intestine submucosa is available, other sources of submucosa are known to be effective for tissue remodeling. These sources include, but are not limited to, stomach, bladder, alimentary, respiratory, or genital submucosa, or liver basement membrane. See, e.g., U.S. Pat. Nos. 6,379,710, 6,171,344, 6,099,567, and 5,554,389, hereby incorporated by reference. Further, while SIS is most often porcine derived, it is known that these various submucosa materials may be derived from non-porcine sources, including bovine and ovine sources. Additionally, the ECM material may also include partial layers of laminar muscular is mucosa, muscular is mucosoa, lamina propria, stratum compactum and/or other tissue materials depending upon factors such as the source from which the ECM material was derived and the delamination procedure.
For the purposes of this invention, it is within the definition of a Naturally occurring ECM to clean, delaminate, and/or comminute the ECM, or even to cross-link the collagen fibers within the ECM. It is also within the definition of naturally occurring ECM to fully or partially remove one or more sub-components of the naturally occurring ECM. However, it is not within the definition of a naturally occurring ECM to separate and purify the natural collagen or other components or sub-components of the ECM and reform a matrix material from the purified natural collagen or other components or sub-components of the ECM. While reference is made to SIS, it is understood that other naturally occurring ECMs (e.g., stomach, bladder, alimentary, respiratory, and genital submucosa, and liver basement membrane), whatever the source (e.g., bovine, porcine, ovine) are within the scope of this disclosure. Thus, in this application, the terms “naturally occurring extracellular matrix” or “naturally occurring ECM” are intended to refer to extracellular matrix material that has been cleaned, disinfected, sterilized, and optionally cross-linked. The terms “naturally occurring extracellular matrix” and “naturally occurring ECM” are also intended to include ECM foam material prepared as described in copending U.S. patent application Ser. No. 60/388,761 entitled “Extracellular Matrix Scaffold and Method for Making the Same”, filed concurrently herewith.
There are currently many ways in which various types of tissues such as ligaments and tendons, for example, are reinforced and/or reconstructed. Suturing the torn or ruptured ends of the tissue is one method of attempting to restore function to the injured tissue. Sutures may also be reinforced through the use of synthetic non-bioabsorbable or bioabsorbable materials. Autografting, where tissue is taken from another site on the patient's body, is another means of soft tissue reconstruction. Yet another means of repair or reconstruction can be achieved through allografting, where tissue from a donor of the same species is used. Still another means of repair or reconstruction of soft tissue is through xenografting in which tissue from a donor of a different species is used.
According to the present invention, a bioprosthetic device for soft tissue attachment, reinforcement, and/or reconstruction is provided. The bioprosthetic device comprises SIS or other ECM formed to include a tissue layer, and a synthetic portion coupled to the tissue layer. The tissue layer may also be dehydrated.
In one embodiment, the SIS portion of the bioprosthetic device includes a top tissue layer of SIS material and a bottom tissue layer of SIS material coupled to the top tissue layer. The synthetic portion of the bioprosthetic device includes a row of fibers positioned to lie between the top and bottom tissue layers of the SIS portion. The fibers are positioned to lie in a spaced-apart coplanar relation to one another along a length, L, of the SIS portion. The fibers are each formed to include a length L2, where L2 is longer than L so that an outer end portion of each fiber extends beyond the SIS portion in order to anchor the bioprosthetic device to the surrounding soft tissue.
Illustratively, in another embodiment, the synthetic reinforcing portion of the bioprosthetic device includes a mesh member formed to define the same length, L, as the SIS portion, or may include a mesh member having a body portion coupled to the SIS portion and outer wing members coupled to the body portion and positioned to extend beyond the length, L, and a width, W, of the SIS portion in order to provide more material for anchoring the bioprosthetic device to the surrounding soft tissue.
The synthetic reinforcing portion of the device enhances the mechanical integrity of the construct in one (for fiber reinforcements) or two (for fiber or mesh reinforcements) dimensions. For the repair of tissues such as meniscal or articular cartilage, or discs, integrity in three dimensions is desirable for the implant to withstand the shear forces that will be present after implantation. Thus, in one embodiment of the present application, the absorbable synthetic portion of the device is in a three-dimensional form, to provide mechanical strength in three dimensions. The absorbable synthetic may be a fibrous nonwoven construct or a three-dimensional woven mesh, for example.
For the repair of certain other types of tissues such as tendons, ligaments, or fascia, tissue infiltration and repair in three dimensions is desirable, although three-dimensional enhanced mechanical integrity of the implant is not necessary. Thus, another embodiment of this invention is a composite device comprised of an SIS portion and an absorbable synthetic foam. The absorbable synthetic foam, in one example, is made of a biocompatible polymer that has a degradation profile that exceeds that of the SIS portion of the device. In this case, the SIS portion of the device provides the initial suturability of the product, and the synthetic foam provides an increased surface area in three dimensions for enhanced tissue infiltration. In a further embodiment, that synthetic foam is made of 65/35 polyglycolic acid/ polycaprolactone, or 60/40 polylactic acid/polycaprolactone, or a 50:50 mix of the two.
The ECM portion of the composite may be provided as a single, hydrated sheet of SIS. Alternatively, the single sheet of SIS is lyophilized (freeze-dried). Such a treatment renders increased porosity to the SIS sheet, thereby enhancing it's capacity for allowing tissue ingrowth. Additionally, this SIS portion may comprise multiple sheets of SIS that have been laminated together by mechanical pressure while hydrated. The laminated SIS assembly optionally further physically crosslinked by partially or fully drying (down to less than 15% moisture content) under vacuum pressure. Alternatively, the laminated SIS assembly is lyophilized, instead of being vacuum dried, to increase its porosity. In still another embodiment, the SIS sheet or laminate is perforated by mechanical means, to create holes ranging, for example, from 1 mm to 1 cm. Another embodiment uses woven textiles of single or multi-layer SIS strips that have been optionally vacuum dried or lyophilized, to create meshes having different-sized openings. The woven mesh SIS optionally is assembled while the SIS is still hydrated and then the whole assembly vacuum-dried or lyophilized. Such a construct is suturable in the short term, and has the advantage of having a very open structure for tissue ingrowth over time.
The three-dimensional synthetic portion of the device is illustratively provided in the form of a fibrous nonwoven or foam material. The synthetic portion of the device preferably has interconnecting pores or voids to facilitate the transport of nutrients and/or invasion of cells into the scaffold. The interconnected voids range in size, for example, from about 20 to 400 microns, preferably 50 to 250 microns, and constitute about 70 to 95 percent of the total volume of the construct. The range of the void size in the construct can be manipulated by changing process steps during construct fabrication. The foam optionally may be formed around a reinforcing material, for example, a knitted mesh.
The synthetic reinforcing portion of the device is made of a fibrous matrix made, for example, of threads, yams, nets, laces, felts, and nonwovens. An illustrated method of combining the bioabsorbable fibrous materials, e.g. fibers, to make the fibrous matrix for use in devices of the present invention is known to one skilled in the art as the wet lay process of forming nonwovens. The wet lay method has been described in “Nonwoven Textiles,” by Radko Krema, Textile Trade Press, Manchester, England, 1967 pages 175-176.
Alternatively, the synthetic reinforcing portion of the device is made of a three-dimensional mesh or textile. A preferred method of combining the bioabsorbable fibrous materials, e.g. fibers, to make the fibrous matrix for use in devices of the present invention is known to one skilled in the art as three-dimensional weaving or knitting. The three-dimensional weaving/knitting or braiding method has been described by several groups who have used the constructs for tissue engineering applications including Chen et al. in “Collagen Hybridization with Poly(1-Lactic Acid) Braid Promotes Ligament Cell Migration,” Mater. Sci. Eng. C, 17(1-2), 95-99(2001), and Bercovy et al., in “Carbon-PLGA Prostheses for Ligament Reconstruction Experimental Basis and Short Term Results in Man,” Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res., (196), 159-68(1985). Such a three-dimensional material can provide both reinforcement and three-dimensional form.
The synthetic reinforcing portion of the tissue implant of the present invention may include textiles with woven, knitted, warped knitted (i.e., lace-like), nonwoven, and braided structures. In an exemplary embodiment the reinforcing component has a mesh-like structure. However, in any of the above structures, mechanical properties of the material can be altered by changing the density or texture of the material. The fibers used to make the reinforcing component can be for example, monofilaments, yams, threads, braids, or bundles of fibers. These fibers can be made of any biocompatible material, including bioabsorbable materials such as polylactic acid (PLA), polyglycolic acid (PGA), polycaprolactone (PCL), polydioxanone (PDO), trimethylene carbonate (TMC), polyvinyl alcohol (PVA), copolymers or blends thereof. In an exemplary embodiment, the fibers that comprise the nonwoven or three-dimensional mesh are formed of a polylactic acid and polyglycolic acid copolymer at a 95:5 mole ratio.
The ECM and the synthetic three-dimensional portion are provided in layers. It is understood for the purposes of this invention that the term “coupled to” describes a relationship wherein a surface of one layer is in contact with a surface of another layer and the two surfaces are connected through mechanical or chemical means, such as through lamination, crosslinking, diffusion of the material of one layer into interstices of the adjacent layer, stitching, and the like. “Sandwiched between” describes a relationship wherein a middle layer has a first surface in contact with a surface of an adjacent layer, and a second opposite-facing surface in contact with a surface of a second adjacent layer. Again, it is understood that the sandwiched layers are connected through mechanical or chemical means. The synthetic reinforcing portion may be provided as individual fibers or as layers. The synthetic reinforcing portion may be imbedded within a foam layer, provided between two other layers that are otherwise coupled together, or may form a layer that is coupled to one or more adjacent layers.
It is anticipated that the devices of the present invention can be combined with one or more bioactive agents (in addition to those already present in naturally occurring ECM), one or more biologically-derived agents or substances, one or more cell types, one or more biological lubricants, one or more biocompatible inorganic materials, one or more biocompatible synthetic polymers and one or more biopolymers. Moreover, the devices of the present invention can be combined with devices containing such materials.
“Bioactive agents” include one or more of the following: chemotactic agents; therapeutic agents (e.g. antibiotics, steroidal and non-steroidal analgesics and anti-inflammatories, anti-rejection agents such as immunosuppressants and anti-cancer drugs); various proteins (e.g. short chain peptides, bone morphogenic proteins, glycoprotein and lipoprotein); cell attachment mediators; biologically active ligands; integrin binding sequence; ligands; various growth and/or differentiation agents (e.g. epidermal growth factor, IGF-I, IGF-II, TGF-β I-III, growth and differentiation factors, vascular endothelial growth factors, fibroblast growth factors, platelet derived growth factors, insulin derived growth factor and transforming growth factors, parathyroid hormone, parathyroid hormone related peptide, bFGF; TGFβ superfamily factors; BMP-2; BMP-4; BMP-6; BMP-12; sonic hedgehog; GDF5; GDF6; GDF8; PDGF); small molecules that affect the upregulation of specific growth factors; tenascin-C; hyaluronic acid; chondroitin sulfate; fibronectin; decorin; thromboelastin; thrombin-derived peptides; heparin-binding domains; heparin; heparan sulfate; DNA fragments and DNA plasmids. If other such substances have therapeutic value in the orthopaedic field, it is anticipated that at least some of these substances will have use in the present invention, and such substances should be included in the meaning of “bioactive agent” and “bioactive agents” unless expressly limited otherwise.
“Biologically derived agents” include one or more of the following: bone (autograft, allograft, and xenograft) and derivates of bone; cartilage (autograft, allograft, and xenograft), including, for example, meniscal tissue, and derivatives; ligament (autograft, allograft, and xenograft) and derivatives; derivatives of intestinal tissue (autograft, allograft, and xenograft), including for example submucosa; derivatives of stomach tissue (autograft, allograft, and xenograft), including for example submucosa; derivatives of bladder tissue (autograft, allograft, and xenograft), including for example submucosa; derivatives of alimentary tissue (autograft, allograft, and xenograft), including for example submucosa; derivatives of respiratory tissue (autograft, allograft, and xenograft), including for example submucosa; derivatives of genital tissue (autograft, allograft, and xenograft), including for example submucosa; derivatives of liver tissue (autograft, allograft, and xenograft), including for example liver basement membrane; derivatives of skin tissue; platelet rich plasma (PRP), platelet poor plasma, bone marrow aspirate, demineralized bone matrix, insulin derived growth factor, whole blood, fibrin and blood clot. Purified ECM and other collagen sources are also intended to be included within “biologically derived agents.” If other such substances have therapeutic value in the orthopaedic field, it is anticipated that at least some of these substances will have use in the present invention, and such substances should be included in the meaning of “biologically-derived agent” and “biologically-derived agents” unless expressly limited otherwise.
“Biologically derived agents” also include bioremodelable collageneous tissue matrices. The expressions “bioremodelable collagenous tissue matrix” and “naturally occurring bioremodelable collageneous tissue matrix” include matrices derived from native tissue selected from the group consisting of skin, artery, vein, pericardium, heart valve, dura mater, ligament, bone, cartilage, bladder, liver, stomach, fascia and intestine, tendon, whatever the source. Although “naturally occurring bioremodelable collageneous tissue matrix” is intended to refer to matrix material that has been cleaned, processed, sterilized, and optionally crosslinked, it is not within the definition of a naturally occurring bioremodelable collageneous tissue matrix to purify the natural fibers and reform a matrix material from purified natural fibers. The term “bioremodelable collageneous tissue matrices” includes “extracellular matrices” within its definition.
“Cells” include one or more of the following: chondrocytes; fibrochondrocytes; osteocytes; osteoblasts; osteoclasts; synoviocytes; bone marrow cells; mesenchymal cells; stromal cells; stem cells; embryonic stem cells; precursor cells derived from adipose tissue; peripheral blood progenitor cells; stem cells isolated from adult tissue; genetically transformed cells; a combination of chondrocytes and other cells; a combination of osteocytes and other cells; a combination of synoviocytes and other cells; a combination of bone marrow cells and other cells; a combination of mesenchymal cells and other cells; a combination of stromal cells and other cells; a combination of stem cells and other cells; a combination of embryonic stem cells and other cells; a combination of precursor cells isolated from adult tissue and other cells; a combination of peripheral blood progenitor cells and other cells; a combination of stem cells isolated from adult tissue and other cells; and a combination of genetically transformed cells and other cells. If other cells are found to have therapeutic value in the orthopaedic field, it is anticipated that at least some of these cells will have use in the present invention, and such cells should be included within the meaning of “cell” and “cells” unless expressly limited otherwise. Illustratively, in one example of embodiments that are to be seeded with living cells such as chondrocytes, a sterilized implant may be subsequently seeded with living cells and packaged in an appropriate medium for the cell type used. For example, a cell culture medium comprising Dulbecco's Modified Eagles Medium (DMEM) can be used with standard additives such as non-essential amino acids, glucose, ascorbic acid, sodium pyrovate, fungicides, antibiotics, etc., in concentrations deemed appropriate for cell type, shipping conditions, etc.
“Biological lubricants” include: hyaluronic acid and its salts, such as sodium hyaluronate; glycosaminoglycans such as dermatan sulfate, heparan sulfate, chondroiton sulfate and keratan sulfate; synovial fluid and components of synovial fluid, including mucinous glycoproteins (e.g. lubricin), tribonectins, articular cartilage superficial zone proteins, surface-active phospholipids, lubricating glycoproteins I, II; vitronectin; and rooster comb hyaluronate. “Biological lubricant” is also intended to include commercial products such as ARTHREASE™ high molecular weight sodium hyaluronate, available in Europe from DePuy International, Ltd. of Leeds, England, and manufactured by Bio-Technology General (Israel) Ltd., of Rehovot, Israel; SYNVISC® Hylan G-F 20, manufactured by Biomatrix, Inc., of Ridgefield, N.J. and distributed by Wyeth-Ayerst Pharmaceuticals of Philadelphia, Pa.; HYLAGAN® sodium hyaluronate, available from Sanofi-Synthelabo, Inc., of New York, N.Y., manufactured by FIDIA S.p.A., of Padua, Italy; and HEALON® sodium hyaluronate, available from Pharmacia Corporation of Peapack, N.J. in concentrations of 1%, 1.4% and 2.3% (for opthalmologic uses). If other such substances have therapeutic value in the orthopaedic field, it is anticipated that at least some of these substances will have use in the present invention, and such substances should be included in the meaning of “biological lubricant” and “biological lubricants” unless expressly limited otherwise.
“Biocompatible polymers” is intended to include both synthetic polymers and biopolymers (e.g. collagen). Examples of biocompatible polymers include: polyesters of [alpha]-hydroxycarboxylic acids, such as poly(L-lactide) (PLLA) and polyglycolide (PGA); poly-p-dioxanone (PDO); polycaprolactone (PCL); polyvinyl alchohol (PVA); polyethylene oxide (PEO); polymers disclosed in U.S. Pat. Nos. 6,333,029 and 6,355,699; and any other bioresorbable and biocompatible polymer, co-polymer or mixture of polymers or co-polymers that are utilized in the construction of prosthetic implants. In addition, as new biocompatible, bioresorbable materials are developed, it is expected that at least some of them will be useful materials from which orthopaedic devices may be made. It should be understood that the above materials are identified by way of example only, and the present invention is not limited to any particular material unless expressly called for in the claims.
“Biocompatible inorganic materials” include materials such as hydroxyapatite, all calcium phosphates, alpha-tricalcium phosphate, beta-tricalcium phosphate, calcium carbonate, barium carbonate, calcium sulfate, barium sulfate, polymorphs of calcium phosphate, sintered and non-sintered ceramic particles, and combinations of such materials. If other such substances have therapeutic value in the orthopaedic field, it is anticipated that at least some of these substances will have use in the present invention, and such substances should be included in the meaning of “biocompatible inorganic material” and “biocompatible inorganic materials” unless expressly limited otherwise.
It is expected that various combinations of bioactive agents, biologically derived agents, cells, biological lubricants, biocompatible inorganic materials, biocompatible polymers can be used with the devices of the present invention.
Thus, in one aspect of this invention a bioprosthetic device is provided comprising a layer of ECM material having a first surface, and a three-dimensional synthetic portion having a first surface, wherein the first surface of the ECM layer is coupled to the first surface of the three-dimensional synthetic portion. The three-dimensional synthetic portion may be a fibrous material, illustratively selected from the group consisting of mesh, textile, and felt. Alternatively, the three-dimensional synthetic portion may be a synthetic foam.
In another aspect of this invention a prosthetic device is provided comprising one or more layers of bioremodelable collageneous tissue matrices material coupled to one or more three-dimensional synthetic bodies to provide a three-dimensional composite for tissue attachment, reinforcement, or reconstruction.
In yet another aspect of this invention, a method for making a bioprosthetic device is provided, the method comprising the steps of providing a layer of ECM material having a first surface, placing a polymer solution in contact the first surface of the ECM material to make an assembly, wherein the polymer is selected to form a foam upon lyophilization, and lyophilizing the assembly.
Additional features of the present invention will become apparent to those skilled in the art upon consideration of the following description of preferred embodiments of the invention exemplifying the best mode of carrying out the invention as presently perceived.
The detailed description particularly refers to the accompanying figures in which:
A composite bioprosthetic device 10, as shown in
SIS portion 12 of bioprosthetic device 10, as shown in
Synthetic portion 14 of bioprosthetic device 10 includes row 26 of four fibers 28, as shown in
As shown in
An alternate bioprosthetic device 110 is shown in
Although fibers 28 of bioprosthetic devices 10, 110 are positioned to lie along length, L, of each respective SIS portion 12, 112, it is within the scope of this disclosure to include a synthetic portion 214 of an alternate bioprosthetic device 210, as shown in
Similar to bioprosthetic device 110 shown in
Yet another bioprosthetic device 310 is shown in
In
Another embodiment of the present invention includes a bioprosthetic device 410 having a synthetic portion 414 including a mesh member 420, as shown in
Yet another embodiment of the present invention is shown in
Synthetic reinforcing material 614 illustratively comprises a two-dimensional fibrous matrix construct, as shown in
Three-dimensional synthetic portion 624 is a nonwoven material prepared to have numerous interconnecting pores or voids 626. Illustratively, the size of the voids may range from 20 to 400 microns. However, the size of the voids may be adjusted depending on the application, and the size may be manipulated by changing process steps during construction by altering freezing temperature, rate of temperature change and vacuum profile. Examples of various polymers that may be used for the foam, as well as various lyophilization profiles to control porosity, are described in U.S. Pat. Nos. 6,333,029 and 6,355,699, hereby incorporated by reference. Optionally, three-dimensional synthetic portion 624 further comprises a synthetic reinforcing layer 628 embedded within the foam. Reinforcing layer 628 illustratively provides enhanced mechanical integrity to the three-dimensional synthetic portion. In an illustrated embodiment, a Vicryl knitted mesh is used. However, other reinforcing layers may be used.
Optionally, three-dimensional synthetic portion 624 may be a hybrid ECM/synthetic foam portion. In making such a foam, the polymer solution is mixed with a slurry of comminuted SIS prior to lyophilization. See copending U.S. application Ser. No. 60/388,761 entitled “Extracellular Matrix Scaffold and Method for Making the Same”, hereby incorporated by reference.
While the devices shown in
Sheets of clean, disinfected porcine SIS material were obtained as described in U.S. Pat. Nos. 4,902,508 and 4,956,178. Ten strips, 3.5 inches wide and 6 inches long were cut. The strips were hydrated by placing in RO water, at room temperature, for 5 minutes.
To assemble the implant, five SIS strips were placed on top of each other, while ensuring no air bubbles were trapped between the strips. A knitted Panacryl™ mesh, 2 inches wide and 5 inches long, was placed centrally on the 5-layer thick SIS strip. The mesh had been pretreated to remove any traces of oil or other contaminants due to handling. This was done by a series of rinses, each 2 minutes long, in 100%, 90%, 80%, 70% ethanol (200 proof) in RO water, followed by a final 5 minute in RO water. Subsequently, a second 5-layer thick strip of SIS was assembled and placed to sandwich the mesh between the two SIS strips.
The implant was dried under vacuum pressure using a gel drier system (Model FB-GD-45, Fisher Scientific, Pittsburgh, Pa.) for 3 hours. The gel drier bed temperature was set at 30° C. for the procedure. This drying procedure results in “squeezing out” of the bulk water in the implant and also reduces the amount of bound water within the tissue, resulting in a final moisture of between 7%-8%. This process also results in a physical crosslinking between the laminates of SIS and between the mesh and adjacent SIS laminates.
This example describes the preparation of three-dimensional composite tissue implants incorporating a biodegradable SIS laminated sheet, a synthetic reinforcement in the form of a biodegradable mesh, and a synthetic degradable foam.
A solution of the polymer to be lyophilized to form the foam component was prepared in a four step process. A 95:5 weight ratio solution of 1,4-dioxane/(40/60 PCL/PLA) was made and poured into a flask. The flask was placed in a water bath, stirring at 60-70° C. for 5 hrs. The solution was filtered using an extraction thimble, extra coarse porosity, type ASTM 170-220 (EC) and stored in flasks.
A three-dimensional mesh material composed of a 95:5 copolymer of polylactic/polyglycolic acid (PLA/PGA) knitted mesh was rendered flat to control curling by using a compression molder at 80° C. for 2 min. After preparing the mesh, 0.8-mm metal shims were placed at each end of a 4×4 inch aluminum mold, and the mesh was sized to fit the mold. The synthetic mesh was then laid into the mold, covering both shims. Next, an SIS laminated sheet was placed over the mesh followed by additional shims to cover the edges of the SIS and synthetic mesh.
The polymer solution (40:60 PCL/PLA) was added into mold such that the solution covered the sheet of SIS as well as the mesh and reached a level of 3.0 mm in the mold.
The mold assembly then was placed on the shelf of the lyophilizer (Virtis, Gardiner, N.Y.) and the freeze dry sequence begun. The freeze dry sequence used in this example was: 1) −17° C. for 60 minutes; 2) −5° C. for 60 minutes under vacuum of 100 mT; 3) 5° C. for 60 minutes under vacuum of 20 mT; 4) 20° C. for 60 minutes under vacuum of 20 mT.
After the cycle was completed, the mold assembly was taken out of the freeze drier and allowed to degas in a vacuum hood for 2 to 3 hours, and stored under nitrogen.
The resultant bioprosthetic device has a structure as illustrated in
This example uses the process outlined in Example 2 to fabricate a biodegradable composite scaffold of the present invention where the foam component is a 65:35 PGA/PCL copolymer.
This example uses the process outlined in Example 2 to fabricate a biodegradable composite scaffold of the present invention where the synthetic knitted mesh component is composed of 100% PDO.
This example uses the process outlined in Example 2 to fabricate a biodegradable composite scaffold of the present invention where in place of a three-dimensional mesh, the synthetic component is a nonwoven fibrous structure composed of either 100% PDO, 100% 90/10 PGA/PLA or a combination of the two.
This example uses the process outlined in Example 2 to fabricate a biodegradable composite scaffold of the present invention where the SIS component is soaked overnight in the polymer solution (5% wt 60/40 PLA/PCL in dioxane) prior to placement over the synthetic mesh. Enhanced lamination between the components was found when this additional soaking step was added to the process as evidenced by a composite with a greater degree of handlability.
This example uses the process outlined in Example 2 to fabricate a biodegradable composite scaffold of the present invention where the SIS component is a single layer sheet rather than a laminated sheet.
This example uses the process outlined in Example 2 to fabricate a biodegradable composite scaffold of the present invention where the SIS laminated sheet is perforated with holes ranging from 1 mm-1 cm. These perforations allow for enhanced penetration of the polymer solution through the SIS sheet.
This example uses the process outlined in Example 2 to fabricate a biodegradable composite scaffold of the present invention where the SIS reinforcing component is a “woven mesh” of laminated strips sandwiched between two layers of 60/40 PLA/PCL foam.
Although the invention has been described in detail with reference to certain preferred embodiments, variations and modifications exist within the scope and spirit of the invention as described and defined in the following claims.
This application is a continuation-in-part of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 09/918,116, filed Jul. 30, 2001, now U.S. Pat. No. 6,638,312, which claims priority from U.S. Provisional Application No. 60/223,399, filed Aug. 4, 2000 hereby incorporated by reference. Cross reference is made to copending U.S. patent applications “Meniscus Regeneration Device and Method” (and related U.S. Provisional App. Ser. No. 60/305,786, filed Jul. 16, 2001); “Devices from Naturally Occurring Biologically Derived Materials”“Apparatus and Method for the Repair of Damaged or Diseased Cartilage”“Unitary Surgical Device and Method for Repair and Regeneration of Damaged or Diseased Intra-Articular Fibrocartilage” “Hybrid Biologic/Synthetic Porous Extracellular Matrix Scaffolds” “Lubricated Cartilage Repair and Regeneration Device and Method” and “Extracellular Matrix Scaffold and Method for Making the Same”, each of which is assigned to the same assignee as the present application, each of which is filed concurrently herewith, and each of which is hereby incorporated by reference.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3272204 | Artandi et al. | Sep 1966 | A |
3562820 | Braun | Feb 1971 | A |
4352463 | Baker | Oct 1982 | A |
4400833 | Kurland | Aug 1983 | A |
4418691 | Yannas et al. | Dec 1983 | A |
4610397 | Fischer et al. | Sep 1986 | A |
4642120 | Nevo et al. | Feb 1987 | A |
4703108 | Silver et al. | Oct 1987 | A |
4846835 | Grande | Jul 1989 | A |
4873976 | Schreiber | Oct 1989 | A |
4880429 | Stone | Nov 1989 | A |
4902508 | Badylak et al. | Feb 1990 | A |
4919667 | Richmond | Apr 1990 | A |
4956178 | Badylak et al. | Sep 1990 | A |
4956179 | Bamberg et al. | Sep 1990 | A |
4976715 | Bays et al. | Dec 1990 | A |
5007934 | Stone | Apr 1991 | A |
5061286 | Lyle | Oct 1991 | A |
5102421 | Anspach, Jr. | Apr 1992 | A |
5108438 | Stone | Apr 1992 | A |
5128326 | Balazs et al. | Jul 1992 | A |
5236431 | Gogolewski et al. | Aug 1993 | A |
5246441 | Ross et al. | Sep 1993 | A |
5275826 | Badylak et al. | Jan 1994 | A |
5281422 | Badylak et al. | Jan 1994 | A |
5306311 | Stone et al. | Apr 1994 | A |
5320633 | Allen et al. | Jun 1994 | A |
5329846 | Bonutti | Jul 1994 | A |
5350583 | Yoshizato et al. | Sep 1994 | A |
5352463 | Badylak et al. | Oct 1994 | A |
5372821 | Badylak et al. | Dec 1994 | A |
5374268 | Sander | Dec 1994 | A |
5376118 | Kaplan et al. | Dec 1994 | A |
5380334 | Torrie et al. | Jan 1995 | A |
5445833 | Badylak et al. | Aug 1995 | A |
5447940 | Harvey et al. | Sep 1995 | A |
5460962 | Kemp | Oct 1995 | A |
5479033 | Baca et al. | Dec 1995 | A |
5514181 | Light et al. | May 1996 | A |
5516533 | Badylak et al. | May 1996 | A |
5554389 | Badylak et al. | Sep 1996 | A |
5569252 | Justin et al. | Oct 1996 | A |
5573784 | Badylak et al. | Nov 1996 | A |
5591234 | Kirsch | Jan 1997 | A |
5593441 | Lichtenstein et al. | Jan 1997 | A |
5595621 | Light et al. | Jan 1997 | A |
5601558 | Torrie et al. | Feb 1997 | A |
5632745 | Schwartz | May 1997 | A |
5641518 | Badylak et al. | Jun 1997 | A |
5645860 | Knapp, Jr. et al. | Jul 1997 | A |
5660225 | Saffran | Aug 1997 | A |
5668288 | Storey et al. | Sep 1997 | A |
5669912 | Spetzler | Sep 1997 | A |
5677355 | Shalaby et al. | Oct 1997 | A |
5681353 | Li et al. | Oct 1997 | A |
5693085 | Buirge et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
5695998 | Badylak et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
5702462 | Oberlander | Dec 1997 | A |
5711960 | Shikinami | Jan 1998 | A |
5711969 | Patel et al. | Jan 1998 | A |
5730933 | Peterson | Mar 1998 | A |
5733337 | Carr, Jr. et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
5733868 | Peterson et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
5735897 | Buirge | Apr 1998 | A |
5735903 | Li et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
5736372 | Vacanti et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
5753267 | Badylak et al. | May 1998 | A |
5755791 | Whitson et al. | May 1998 | A |
5759190 | Vibe-Hansen et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5759205 | Valentini | Jun 1998 | A |
5762600 | Bruchman et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5762966 | Knapp et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5769899 | Schwartz et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5773577 | Cappello | Jun 1998 | A |
5788625 | Plouhar et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
5795353 | Felt | Aug 1998 | A |
5800537 | Bell | Sep 1998 | A |
5830708 | Naughton | Nov 1998 | A |
5834232 | Bishop et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5842477 | Naughton et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
5847012 | Shalaby et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
5855613 | Antanavich et al. | Jan 1999 | A |
5855619 | Caplan et al. | Jan 1999 | A |
5863551 | Woerly | Jan 1999 | A |
5866414 | Badylak et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
5885619 | Patel et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5891558 | Bell et al. | Apr 1999 | A |
5899939 | Boyce et al. | May 1999 | A |
5916265 | Hu | Jun 1999 | A |
5922028 | Plouhar et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
5939323 | Valentini et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5948429 | Bell et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
5954723 | Spetzler | Sep 1999 | A |
5954747 | Clark | Sep 1999 | A |
5955110 | Patel et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
5958874 | Clark et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
5968096 | Whitson et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
5969020 | Shalaby et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
5971987 | Huxel et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
5980524 | Justin et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
5981802 | Katz | Nov 1999 | A |
5981825 | Brekke | Nov 1999 | A |
5989269 | Vibe-Hansen et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
5989280 | Euteneuer et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
5993475 | Lin et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
5993844 | Abraham et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
5997575 | Whitson et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6017348 | Hart et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
6027744 | Vacanti et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6042610 | Li et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6051750 | Bell | Apr 2000 | A |
6056752 | Roger | May 2000 | A |
6056777 | McDowell | May 2000 | A |
6056778 | Grafton et al. | May 2000 | A |
6060640 | Pauley et al. | May 2000 | A |
6068648 | Cole et al. | May 2000 | A |
6077989 | Kandel et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6080194 | Pachence et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6093201 | Cooper et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6098347 | Jaeger et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6099567 | Badylak et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6110212 | Gregory | Aug 2000 | A |
6126686 | Badylak et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6146385 | Torrie et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6152935 | Kammerer et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6153292 | Bell et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6156044 | Kammerer et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6165225 | Antanavich et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6171344 | Atala | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6176880 | Plouhar et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6179840 | Bowman | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6179872 | Bell et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6187039 | Hiles et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6206931 | Cook et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6214049 | Gayer et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6224892 | Searle | May 2001 | B1 |
6235057 | Roger et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6242247 | Rieser et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6251143 | Schwartz et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6251876 | Bellini et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6258124 | Darois et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6264702 | Ory et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6265333 | Dzenis et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6270530 | Eldridge et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6273893 | McAllen, III et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6280473 | Lemperle et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6283980 | Vibe-Hansen et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6288043 | Spiro et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6290711 | Caspari et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6293961 | Schwartz et al. | Sep 2001 | B2 |
6294041 | Boyce et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6306156 | Clark | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6306159 | Schwartz et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6306177 | Felt et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6319258 | McAllen, III et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6319271 | Schwartz et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6326025 | Sigler et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6333029 | Vyakarnam et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6334872 | Termin et al. | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6355699 | Vyakarnam et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6358284 | Fearnot et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6364884 | Bowman et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6371958 | Overaker | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6373221 | Koike et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6379367 | Vibe-Hansen et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6379710 | Badylak | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6383221 | Scarborough et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6387693 | Rieser et al. | May 2002 | B2 |
6409764 | White et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6440444 | Boyce et al. | Aug 2002 | B2 |
6451032 | Ory et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6458158 | Anderson et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6458383 | Chen et al. | Oct 2002 | B2 |
6464729 | Kandel | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6497650 | Nicolo | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6517564 | Grafton et al. | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6572650 | Abraham et al. | Jun 2003 | B1 |
6592623 | Bowlin et al. | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6596296 | Nelson et al. | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6638312 | Plouhar et al. | Oct 2003 | B2 |
6652872 | Nevo et al. | Nov 2003 | B2 |
6666892 | Hiles et al. | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6692499 | Törmäläet et al. | Feb 2004 | B2 |
6812221 | McKeehan et al. | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6840962 | Vacanti et al. | Jan 2005 | B1 |
20010024658 | Chen et al. | Sep 2001 | A1 |
20010043943 | Coffey | Nov 2001 | A1 |
20020019649 | Sikora et al. | Feb 2002 | A1 |
20020038151 | Plouhar et al. | Mar 2002 | A1 |
20020048595 | Geistlich et al. | Apr 2002 | A1 |
20020090725 | Simpson et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020091444 | Yang | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020099448 | Hiles | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020131989 | Brown et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020173806 | Giannetti et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20030014126 | Patel et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030021827 | Malaviya et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030023316 | Brown et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030032961 | Pelo et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030033021 | Plouhar et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030033022 | Plouhar et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030036797 | Malaviya et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030036801 | Schwartz et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030044444 | Malaviya et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030049299 | Malaviya et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030212447 | Euteneuer et al. | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20040059431 | Plouhar et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040143344 | Malaviya et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20050249771 | Malaviya et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20050249772 | Malaviya et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
0 446 105 | Jan 1992 | EP |
0 734 736 | Oct 1996 | EP |
1070487 | Jan 2001 | EP |
2 215 209 | Sep 1989 | GB |
11319068 | Nov 1999 | JP |
WO 9009769 | Sep 1990 | WO |
WO 9411008 | May 1994 | WO |
WO 9505083 | Feb 1995 | WO |
WO 9522301 | Aug 1995 | WO |
WO 9506439 | Sep 1995 | WO |
WO 9532623 | Dec 1995 | WO |
WO9624304 | Aug 1996 | WO |
WO 9624661 | Aug 1996 | WO |
9715195 | May 1997 | WO |
WO 9737613 | Oct 1997 | WO |
WO 9806445 | Feb 1998 | WO |
9822154 | May 1998 | WO |
WO 9822158 | May 1998 | WO |
WO 9822158 | May 1998 | WO |
WO 9830167 | Jul 1998 | WO |
WO 9834569 | Aug 1998 | WO |
WO 9903979 | Jan 1999 | WO |
9919005 | Apr 1999 | WO |
WO 9943786 | Sep 1999 | WO |
WO 9947188 | Sep 1999 | WO |
WO 0016822 | Mar 2000 | WO |
WO 0024437 | May 2000 | WO |
WO 0024437 | May 2000 | WO |
WO 0032250 | Jun 2000 | WO |
WO 0048550 | Aug 2000 | WO |
WO 0072782 | Dec 2000 | WO |
WO 0119423 | Mar 2001 | WO |
WO 0139694 | Jun 2001 | WO |
WO 0139694 | Jun 2001 | WO |
WO 0145765 | Jun 2001 | WO |
0170293 | Sep 2001 | WO |
WO 0166159 | Sep 2001 | WO |
WO 03007788 | Jan 2003 | WO |
WO 03007790 | Jan 2003 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Hiles et al., “Mechanical properties of xenogeneic small-intestinal submucosa when used as an aortic graft in the dog”, Journal of Biomedical Materials Research, vol. 29, 883-891, (1995). |
Sandusky, et al., “Healing Comparison of Small Intestine Submucosa and ePTFE Grafts in the Canine Carotid Artery”, J. Surg.Res., 58:415-420. (1995). |
Knapp, et al., “Biocompatibility of Small-Intestine Submucosa in Urinary Tract as Augmentation Cystoplasty Graft and Injectable Suspension”, J Endourology, 8:125-130. (1994). |
Kropp et al., “Regenerative Bladder Augmentation: A Review of the Initial Preclinical Studies with Porcine Small Intestinal Submucosa”, Muscle, Matrix, and Bladder Function. Plenum Press, New York, (1995). |
Kropp et al., “Experimental Assessment of Small Intestinal Submucosa as a Bladder Wall Substitute”, Urology 446:396-400, (1995). |
Vaught et al., “Detrusor Regeneration in the Rat Using Porcine Small Intestinal Submucosa Grafts: Functional Innervation and Receptor Expression”. J. Urol., 155:374-378. (1996). |
Kropp et al, Characterization of Small Intestinal Submucosa Regenerated Canine Detrusor: Assessment of Reinnervation, In Vitro Compliance and contractility. J. of Urol, 156:599-607. (1996). |
Kropp et al., “Regenerative Urinary Bladder Augmentation Using Small Intestinal Submucosa: Urodynamic and Histopathologic Assessment in Long-Term Canine Bladder Augmentations”, Journal of Urology, 155:2098-2104. (1996). |
Aiken et al., “Small Intestinal Submucosa as an Intra-Articular Ligamentous Graft Material: A Pilot Study in Dogs”, Vet Comp Orthopedics Traumatology, 7:124-128. (1994). |
Badylak et al., “The Use of Xenogeneic Small Intestinal Submucosa as a Biomaterial for Achille's Tendon Repair in a dog model”, J Biomed Materials, 9:977-985. (1995). |
Hodde et al., “The Effect of Range of Motion Upon Remodeling of Small Intestinal Submucosa (SIS) when used as an Achilles Tendon Repair Material in the Rabbit”, Tissue Engineering 3, 1:27-37, (1997). |
Ferrand et al., “Directional Porosity of Porcine Small-Intestinal Submucosa”, J Biomed Materials Res, 27:1235-1241, (1993). |
Hiles et al., “Porosity of Porcine Small-Intestinal Submucosa for use as a Vascular Graft”, J Biomed Materials Res, 27: 139-144, (1993). |
Hodde et al., “Glycosaminoglycan Content of Small Intestinal Submucosa: A Bioscaffold for Tissue Replacement”, Tissue Engineering, 2:3, 209-217. (1996). |
Prevel et al., “Small Intestinal Submucosa: Utilization for Repair of Rodent Abdominal Wall Defects”, Ann Plast Surg, 35:374-380. (1995). |
Clarke et al., “Intestine Submucosa and Polypropylene Mesh for Abdominal Wall Repair in Dogs”, J Surg Res, 60:107-114, (1996). |
Prevel et al., “Small Intestinal Submucosa: Utilization as a Wound Dressing in Full-Thickness Rodent Wounds”, Ann Plast Surg. 35:381-388. (1995). |
Cobb et al., “Histology after Dural Grafting with Small Intestinal Submucosa”, Surgical Neurology, 46: 389-394, (1996). |
Cobb et al., “Porcine Small Intestinal Submucosa as a Dural Substitute”, Surgical Neurology, 51:99-104, (1999). |
Voytik-Harbin et al., “Application and Evaluation of the AlamarBlue Assay for Cell Growth and Survival of Fibroblasts”, Journal of Immunological Methods. In Vitro Cell Bio-Animal, 34: 2399-246. (1998). |
Suckow, M.A., “Enhanced Bone Regeneration Using Porcine Small Intestinal Submucosa”, J. Invest Surg, 12: 277, (1999). |
Badylak , S., et al., “Naturally Occurring Extracellular Matrix as a Scaffold for Musculoskeletal Repair”, Clin Orthop, 3675:S333-S3433, (1999). |
Cook, J.L. et al., “Induction of Meniscal Regeneration in Dogs Using a Novel Biomaterial”, Am J Sports Med, 27: 658, (1999). |
Dejardin, L.M. et al., “Use of small intestinal submucosal implants for regeneration of large fascial defects: an experimental study in dogs”, J Biomed Mater Res, 46:203-211, (1999). |
Sacks, M.S., et al., “Quantification of the fiber architecture and biaxial mechanical behavior of porcine intestinal submucosa”, J Biomed Mater Res, 46:1-10, (1999). |
COOK® New Releases, “COOK® Introduces Innovative Surgisis™ Soft Tissue Repair Biomaterial”, (May 21, 2000). |
COOK® News Releases, “COOK® Oasis™ Wound Dressing Biomaterial From COOK® Remodels Partial Thickness Skin Injuries”, (Dec. 23, 1999). |
COOK® News Releases, “Cook Incorporated Forms Dedicated Tissue Engineered Products Group”, (Feb. 16, 2000). |
COOK® News Releases, “FDA Clears Oasis™ Wound Dressing Biomaterial From COOK® for Full-Thickness Skin Injuries”, (Jan. 24, 2000). |
Klootwyk, et al., “The Use of Xenographic SIS as a Biomaterial for Achilles Tendon Repair in Dogs,” First SIS Symposium, Dec. 1996, USA. |
Lenz, et al., “SIS as an ACL Replacement in Dogs and Goats,” First Symposium, Dec. 1996, USA. |
Cook, et al., “Comparison of SIS Cancellous Bone as Substrates for Three-Dimensional Culture of Canine Articular Chondrocytes,” First SIS Symposium, Dec. 1996, USA. |
Badylak, et al., “Different Configurations of Small Interstinal Submucosa as a Biomaterial for Achilles Tendon Repair in a Dog Model, ” First SIS Symposium, Dec. 1996, USA. |
Voytik-Harbin & Badylak, “Induction of Osteogenic Activity by Small Intestinal Submucosa in Rat Calvaria Non-union Defects,” First SIS Symposium, Dec. 1996, USA. |
Kandel, et al., “SIS and Reconstituted Cartilage and Its Use in Joint Resurfacing of Focal Defects in Rabbits,” First SIS Symposium, Dec. 1996, USA. |
Tullius, et al., “Differential Permeabilty of SIS,” First SIS Symposium, Dec. 1996, USA. |
Obermiller, et al., “Suture Retention Strength of SIS,” First SIS Symposium, Dec. 1996, USA. |
Shelton, et al., “Repair of the Canine Medial Meniscus using SIS: A Feasibility Study,” Second SIS Symposium, Dec. 1998, USA. |
Cook, et al., “Meniscal Regeneration in dogs Using Grafts of SIS,” Second SIS Symposium, Dec. 1998, USA. |
Welch, et al., “Healing of Canine Meniscal Defect with Small Intestinal Submucosa Implants,” Dec. 1998, USA. |
Solchaga, et al., “SIS as Delivery Vehicle for Mesenchymal Progenitor Cells,” Dec. 1998, USA. |
Paulino, et al., “The Use of an SIS-PGA Composite Graft for Repair of Cartilage Defect,” Dec. 1998, USA. |
Toombs and May, “Clinical Follow-Up of Three Canine ACL Reconstructions Using an SIS ACL Device,” Dec. 1998, USA. |
Tomasek and Gifford, “Small Intestinal Submucosa Matrix Regulates the Differentiation of Myofibroblasts,” Third SIS Symposium, Nov. 2000, USA. |
Cook, et al., “Tissue Engineering for Meniscal Repair Using SIS,” Third SIS Symposium, Nov. 2000, USA. |
Lifrak, et al., “Enhanced Repair of Goat Meniscal Defects Using Porcine Small Intestinal Submucosa (SIS),” Third SIS Symposium, Nov. 2000, USA. |
Hoffman, “SIS Disc Replacement for the Temporomandibular Joint,” Third SIS Symposium, Nov. 2000, USA. |
Kaeding, “Use of SIS in the Surgical Treatment of Chronic Symptomatic Patella Tendinosis,” Third SIS Symposium, Nov. 2000, USA. |
Tomczak and Kaeding, “Use of SIS in the Surgical Treatment of Tendinosis About the Foot and Ankle,” Third SIS Symposium, Nov. 2000, USA. |
Moore, et al., “Bridging Segmental Defects in Long Bones With Intramedullary Tubes and Periosteal Sleeves Made From Small Intestinal Submucosa (SIS),” Third SIS Symposium, Nov. 2000, USA. |
Wang, et al., “Small Intestinal Submucosa Enhances Healing of Medical Collateral Ligament in a Rabbit Model,” Third SIS Symposium, Nov. 2000, USA. |
Ojha, et al., “PGA-Plla Versus Small Intestinal Submucosa (SIS): A Comparison of Neo-Cartilage Grown From Two Scaffold Materials,” Third SIS Symposium, Nov. 2000, USA. |
Wiklerson, “Use of the Porcine Small Intestine Submucosal Tissue Graft and Repair of Rotator Cuff Tears,” Third SIS Symposium, Nov. 2000, USA. |
“Small Intestinal Submucosa,” Third SIS Symposium, Nov. 2000, USA. |
“Current Clinical Applications of SIS,” Third SIS Symposium, Nov. 2000, USA. |
Hodde, et al., “Glycosaminoglycan Content of Small Intestinal Submucosa: A Potential for GAG-Growth Interactions in SIS-Mediated Healing”, First Symposium, Dec. 1996, USA. |
Friess, “Collagen in drug delivery and tissue engineering”, Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews, vol. 55, No. 12, 2003, pp. 1529-1530. |
Olsen et al., “Recombinant collagen and gelatin for drug delivery”, Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews, vol. 55, No. 12, 2003, pp. 1547-1567. |
Aigner et al., “Collagens-major component of the physiological cartilage matrix, major target of cartilage degeneration, major tool in cartilage repair”, Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews, vol. 55, No. 12, 2003, pp. 1569-1593. |
Geiger et al., “Collagen sponges for bone regeneration with rhBMP-2”, Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews, vol. 55, No. 12, 2003, pp. 1613-1629. |
Ruszczak et al., “Collagen as a carrier for on-site delivery of antibacterial drugs”, Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews, vol. 55, No. 12, 2003, pp. 1679-1698. |
O'Grady et al., “Global regulatory registration requirements for collagen-based combination products: points to consider”, Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews, vol. 55, No. 12, 2003, pp. 1699-1721. |
Matthews et al., “Electrospinning of Collagen Type II: A Feasibility Study”, Journal of Bioactive and Compatible Polymers, vol. 18, Mar. 2003, pp. 125-134. |
Biscarini et al., “Growth of High Vacuum Sublimed Oligomer Thin Films”, ACS Polymer Preprints, vol. 37, No. 2, 1996, pp. 618-619. |
Biscarini et al., “Morphology and roughness of high-vacuum sublimed oligomer thin films”, Thin Solid Films, vol. 439-443, 1996, pp. 284-285. |
Biscarini et al., “Scaling Behavior of Anisotropic Organic Thin Films Grown in High-Vacuum”, Physical Review Letters, vol. 78, No. 12, Mar. 24, 1997, pp. 2389-2392. |
Voytik-Harbin et al., “Identification of Extractable Growth Factors from Small Intestinal Submucosa”,Journal of Cellular Biochemistry, vol. 67, 1997, pp. 478-491. |
McPherson, Ph.D. et al., “Characterization of Fibronectin Derived from Porcine Small Intestinal Submucosa”, Tissue Engineering, vol. 4, No. 1, 1998, pp. 75-83. |
Hodde, et al., “Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor in Porcine-Derived Extracellular Matrix”,Endothelium, vol. 8(1), 2001, pp. 11-24. |
Hodde et al., “Wounds: A Compendium of Clinical Research and Practice”, Website: http:www.hmpcommunications.com/WNDS, Printed: Jul. 12, 2005, 7 pgs. |
Hurst et al., “Mapping of the distribution of significant proteins and proteoglycans in small intestinal submucosa by fluorescence microscopy”, J. Biomater. Sci. Polymer Edn., vol. 12, No. 11, 2001, pp. 1267-1279. |
Hodde et al., “Fibronectin peptides mediate HMEC adhesion to porcine-derived extracellular matrix”, Biomaterials, vol. 23, 2002, pp. 1841-1848. |
Hodde, “Naturally Occurring Scaffolds for Soft Tissue Repair and Regeneration”, Tissue Engineering, vol. 8, No. 2, 2002, pp. 295-308. |
Allman et al., Xenogeneic Extracellular Matrix Grafts Elicit a Th2-Restricted Immune Response, Transplantation, vol. 71, No. 11, Jun. 15, 2001, pp. 1631-1640. |
Allman et al., “The Th2-Restricted Immune Response to Xenogeneic Small Intestinal Submucosa Does Not Influence Systemic Protective Immunity to Viral and Bacterial Pathogens”, Tissue Engineering, vol. 8, No. 1, 2002, pp. 53-62. |
Kr{hacek over (c)}ma, “Nonwoven Textiles”, Textile Trade Press, Manchester, England, 1962, 6 pgs. |
Answers.com,. Definition of “freeze-dry”, Accessed on May 12, 2005, 6 pgs. |
Ma et al., “Microtubular architecture of biodegradable polymer scaffolds”, J. Biomed. Materials Res., vol. 56, No. 4, 2001, pp. 469-477. |
Ma et al., “Biodegradable Polymer Scaffolds with Well-Defined Interconnected Spherical Pore Network”, Tissue Engineering, vol. 7, No. 1, 2001, pp. 23-33. |
Klawitter et al., “An Evaluation of Bone Growth into Porous High Density Polyethylene”, J. Biomed. Materials Res., vol. 10, (1976) pp. 311-323. |
White et at, “Biomaterial Aspects of Interpore-200 Porous Hydroxyapatite”, Dental Clinics of North America, Reconstructive Implant Surgery and Implant Prosthodontics 1, vol. 30, No. 1, pp. 49-67. |
Shors; Coralline Bone Graft Substitutes, Orthopaedic Clinics of North America, Bone Grafting and Bone Graft Substitutes, vol. 30, No. 4, Oct. 1999, pp. 599-613. |
Wang, Experimental Study of Osteogenic Activity of Sintered Hydroxyapatite—On the Relationship of Sintering Temperature and Pore Size—, J. Jpn. Orthop. Assoc., vol. 64, 1990, pp. 847-859. |
Nehrer et al., “Matrix collagen type and pore size influence behavior of seeded canine chondrocytes”, Biomaterials, vol. 18, No. 11, 1997, pp. 769-776. |
Salem et al., “Interactions of 3T3 fibroblasts and endothelial with defined pore ffeatures”, J. Biomed Materials Res., vol. 61, No. 2, 2002, pp. 212-217. |
European Search Report for European Application No. 02750038.8-1219, Mar. 15, 2007, 4 pgs. |
Supplementary European Search Report, Appln No. 02753403.1 (PCT/US 223190) dated Dec. 21, 2006 (3 pages). |
Definitions of “intertwine” and “twine.” American Heritage Dictionary of the English Language Online. Accessed Sep. 29, 2005. 2 pages. |
On-line Medical Dictionary definition of “extracellular matrix” located at http://cancerweb.ncl.ac.uk/cgibin/omd? extracellular+matrix. |
Definitions of “intertwine” and “twine” , American Heritage Dictionary of the English Language Online, Accessed Sep. 29, 2005, 2 pgs. |
How to Cut Meat Products 2001, Urschel Corp., Accessed online at fr.urschel.com/literature/HTCMeat.pdf on Oct. 3, 2005, 8 pgs. |
Definitions of “comminute” and “slurry”, Dictionary.com; Accessed Sep. 20, 2005, 2 pgs. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20030023316 A1 | Jan 2003 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60223399 | Aug 2000 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 09918116 | Jul 2001 | US |
Child | 10172347 | US |