Hybrid circuit having nanotube electromechanical memory

Abstract
A hybrid memory system having electromechanical memory cells is disclosed. A memory cell core circuit has an array of electromechanical memory cells, in which each cell is a crossbar junction at least one element of which is a nanotube or a nanotube ribbon. An access circuit provides array addresses to the memory cell core circuit to select at least one corresponding cell. The access circuit is constructed of semiconductor circuit elements.
Description




BACKGROUND




1. Technical Field




This invention relates in general to nonvolatile memory devices for use as memory storage in an electronic device and in particular to nonvolatile memory arrays that use electromechanical elements as the individual memory cells.




2. Discussion of Related Art




Important characteristics for a memory cell in electronic device are low cost, nonvolatility, high density, low power, and high speed. Conventional memory solutions include Read Only Memory (ROM), Programmable Read only Memory (PROM), Electrically Programmable Memory (EPROM), Electrically Erasable Programmable Read Only Memory (EEPROM), Dynamic Random Access Memory (DRAM) and Static Random Access Memory (SRAM).




ROM is relatively low cost but cannot be rewritten. PROM can be electrically programmed but with only a single write cycle. EPROM has read cycles that are fast relative to ROM and PROM read cycles, but has relatively long erase times and reliability only over a few iterative read/write cycles. EEPROM (or “Flash”) is inexpensive, and has low power consumption but has long write cycles (ms) and low relative speed in comparison to DRAM or SRAM. Flash also has a finite number of read/write cycles leading to low long-term reliability. ROM, PROM, EPROM and EEPROM are all non-volatile, meaning that if power to the memory is interrupted the memory will retain the information stored in the memory cells.




DRAM stores charge on transistor gates that act as capacitors but must be electrically refreshed every few milliseconds complicating system design by requiring separate circuitry to “refresh” the memory contents before the capacitors discharge. SRAM does not need to be refreshed and is fast relative to DRAM, but has lower density and is more expensive relative to DRAM. Both SRAM and DRAM are volatile, meaning that if power to the memory is interrupted the memory will lose the information stored in the memory cells.




Consequently, existing technologies are either non-volatile but are not randomly accessible and have low density, high cost, and limited ability to allow multiples writes with high reliability of the circuit's function, or they are volatile and complicate system design or have low density. Some emerging technologies have attempted to address these shortcomings.




For example, magnetic RAM (MRAM) or ferromagnetic RAM (FRAM) utilizes the orientation of magnetization or a ferromagnetic region to generate a nonvolatile memory cell. MRAM utilizes a magnetoresisitive memory element involving the anisotropic magnetoresistance or giant magnetoresistance of ferromagnetic materials yielding nonvolatility. Both of these types of memory cells have relatively high resistance and low-density. A different memory cell based upon magnetic tunnel junctions has also been examined but has not led to large-scale commercialized MRAM devices. FRAM uses a circuit architecture similar to DRAM but which uses a thin film ferroelectric capacitor. This capacitor is purported to retain its electrical polarization after an externally applied electric field is removed yielding a nonvolatile memory. FRAM suffers from a large memory cell size, and it is difficult to manufacture as a large-scale integrated component. See U.S. Pat. Nos. 4,853,893; 4,888,630; 5,198,994




Another technology having non-volatile memory is phase change memory. This technology stores information via a structural phase change in thin-film alloys incorporating elements such as selenium or tellurium. These alloys are purported to remain stable in both crystalline and amorphous states allowing the formation of a bistable switch. While the nonvolatility condition is met, this technology appears to suffer from slow operations, difficulty of manufacture and reliability and has not reached a state of commercialization. See U.S. Pat. Nos. 3,448,302; 4,845,533; 4,876,667; 6,044,008.




Wire crossbar memory (MWCM) has also been proposed. See U.S. Pat. Nos. 6,128,214; 6,159,620; 6,198,655. These memory proposals envision molecules as bistable switches. Two wires (either a metal or semiconducting type) have a layer of molecules or molecule compounds sandwiched in between. Chemical assembly and electrochemical oxidation or reduction are used to generate an “on” or “off” state. This form of memory requires highly specialized wire junctions and may not retain nonvolatility owing to the inherent instability found in redox processes.




Recently, memory devices have been proposed which use nanoscopic wires, such as single-walled carbon nanotubes, to form crossbar junctions to serve as memory cells. See WO 01/03208, Nanoscopic Wire-Based Devices, Arrays, and Methods of Their Manufacture; and Thomas Rueckes et al., “Carbon Nanotube-Based Nonvolatile Random Access Memory for Molecular Computing,” Science, vol. 289, pp. 94-97, Jul. 7, 2000. Hereinafter these devices are called nanotube wire crossbar memories (NTWCMs). Under these proposals, individual single-walled nanotube wires suspended over other wires define memory cells. Electrical signals are written to one or both wires to cause them to physically attract or repel relative to one another. Each physical state (i.e., attracted or repelled wires) corresponds to an electrical state. Repelled wires are an open circuit junction. Attracted wires are a closed state forming a rectified junction. When electrical power is removed from the junction, the wires retain their physical (and thus electrical) state thereby forming a non-volatile memory cell.




The NTWCM proposals to date rely on directed growth or chemical self-assembly techniques to grow the individual nanotubes needed for the memory cells. These techniques are now believed to be difficult to employ at commercial scales using modern technology. Moreover, they may contain inherent limitations such as the length of the nanotubes that may be grown reliably using these techniques, and it may difficult to control the statistical variance of geometries of nanotube wires so grown.




SUMMARY




The invention provides a hybrid memory system having electromechanical memory cells. A memory cell core circuit has an array of electromechanical memory cells, in which each cell is a crossbar junction at least one element of which is a nanotube or a nanotube ribbon. An access circuit provides array addresses to the memory cell core circuit to select at least one corresponding cell. The access circuit is constructed of semiconductor circuit elements.











BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS




In the Drawing,





FIG. 1

illustrates a nanotube belt crossbar memory device according to certain embodiments of the invention;





FIGS. 2A-B

illustrate two states of a memory cell according to certain embodiments of the invention;





FIG. 3

illustrates acts of making memory devices according to certain embodiments of the invention;





FIGS. 4-11

illustrate several forms of creating an intermediate structure used to make memory devices according to certain embodiments of the invention;





FIG. 12

illustrates the non-woven nanotube fabric, or matted nanotube layer, used to make certain embodiments of the invention;





FIG. 13

illustrates the matted nanotube layer in relation to hidden, underlying traces of certain embodiments of the invention;





FIG. 14

illustrates addressing logic of certain embodiments of the invention;





FIG. 15

illustrates a hybrid technology embodiment of the invention in which the memory core uses nanotube technology; and





FIG. 16

illustrates a hybrid technology embodiment of the invention in which the memory core and addressing lines use nanotube ribbon technology.











DETAILED DESCRIPTION




Preferred embodiments of the invention provide new electromechanical memory arrays and methods for making same. In particular, electromechanical memory cells are created that operate anaologously to the NTWCM devices disclosed in WO 01/03208, which is hereby incorporated by reference in its entirety. However, unlike the NTWCM devices disclosed in WO 01/03208, preferred embodiments of the invention replace the suspended nanoscopic wires used in the NTWCM devices with new ribbons made from a matted layer of nanotubes or a non-woven fabric of nanotubes. These new devices are referred to herein as nanotube ribbon crossbar memories (NTRCMs). The new nanotube belt structures are believed to be easier to build at the desired levels of integration and scale (in number of devices made) and the geometries are more easily controlled.




Because the new nanotube belt crossbar memory devices operate analogously to NTWCM, the description of their architecture and principles of operation is brief. Reference may be made to WO 01/03208 for fuller description and background.





FIG. 1

illustrates an exemplary electromechanical memory array


100


constructed according to principles of preferred embodiments of the invention. The array has a plurality of non volatile memory cells


103


which can be in an “on” state


105


or “off” state


106


. The actual number of such cells is immaterial to understanding the invention but the technology may support devices having information storage capacities equivalent to or larger than modern non-volatile circuit devices.




Each memory cell


103


includes a nanotube ribbon


101


suspended by one or more supports


102


over electrical traces or wires, e.g.,


104


.




Each crossing of a ribbon


101


and a wire, e.g.,


104


forms a crossbar junction and defines a memory cell. Under certain embodiments, each cell may be read or written by applying currents and or voltages to electrodes


112


which are in electrical communication with ribbons


101


or through electrodes (not shown) in communication with traces or wires


104


. The supports


102


are made from a layer


108


of silicon nitride (Si


3


N


4


). Below layer


108


is a gate oxide layer


109


separating the n-doped silicon traces


104


from an underlying silicon wafer


110


.




Referring conjointly to

FIGS. 1-2B

, junction


106


illustrates the cell in a first physical and electrical state in which the nanotube ribbon


101


is separated from corresponding trace


104


. Junction


105


illustrates the cell in a second physical and electrical state in which the nanotube ribbon


101


is deflected toward corresponding trace


104


. In the first state, the junction is an open circuit, which may be sensed as such on either the ribbon


101


or trace


104


when so addressed. In the second state, the junction is a rectified junction (e.g., Schottky or PN), which may be sensed as such on either the tube


101


or trace


104


when so addressed.




Under certain embodiments, the nanotube ribbon


101


may be held in position at the supports by friction. In other embodiments the ribbon may be held by other means, such as by anchoring the ribbons to the supports using any of a variety of techniques. This friction can be increased through the use of chemical interactions including covalent bonding through the use of carbon compounds such as pyrenes or other chemically reactive species. Evaporated or spin-coated material such as metals, semiconductors or insulators especially silicon, titanium, silicon oxide or polyimide could also be added to increase the pinning strength. The nanotube ribbons or individual nanotubes can also be pinned through the use wafer bonding to the surface. See R. J. Chen et al., “Noncovalent Sidewall Functionalization of Single-Walled Carbon Nanotubes for Protein Immobiliation,” J.Am. Chem. Soc., 123, 2001, 3838-39 and Dai et al., Appl. Phys. Lett., 77, 2000, 3015-17 for exemplary techniques for pinning and coating nanotubes by metals. See also WO01/03208 for techniques.




Under certain preferred embodiments as shown in

FIGS. 2A-B

, a nanotube ribbon


101


has a width of about 180 nm and is pinned to a support


102


preferably fabricated of silicon nitride. The local area of trace


104


under ribbon


101


forms an n-doped silicon electrode and is positioned close to the supports


102


and preferably is no wider than the belt, e.g., 180 nm. The relative separation


208


from the top of the support


102


to the deflected position where the belt


101


attaches to electrode


206


(see

FIG. 2B

) should be approximately 5-50 nm. The magnitude of the separation


208


is designed to be compatible with electromechanical switching capabilities of the memory device. For this embodiment, the 5-50 nm separation is preferred for certain embodiments utilizing ribbons


101


made from carbon nanotubes, but other separations may be preferable for other materials. This magnitude arises from the interplay between strain energy and adhesion energy of the deflected nanotubes. These feature sizes are suggested in view of modern manufacturing techniques. Other embodiments may be made with much smaller (or larger) sizes to reflect the manufacturing equipment's capabilities.




The nanotube ribbon


101


of certain embodiments is formed from a non-woven fabric of entangled or matted nanotubes (more below). The switching parameters of the ribbon resemble those of individual nanotubes. Thus, the predicted switching times and voltages of the ribbon should approximate the same times and voltages of nanotubes. Unlike the prior art which relies on directed growth or chemical self-assembly of individual nanotubes, preferred embodiments of the present invention utilize fabrication techniques involving thin films and lithography. This method of fabrication lends itself to generation over large surfaces especially wafers of at least six inches. (In contrast, growing individual nanotubes over a distance beyond sub millimeter distances is currently unfeasible.) The ribbons should exhibit improved fault tolerances over individual nanotubes, by providing redundancy of conduction pathways contained with the ribbons. (If an individual nanotube breaks other tubes within the rib provide conductive paths, whereas if a sole nanotube were used the cell would be faulty.) Moreover, the resistances of the ribbons should be significantly lower than that for an individual nanotubes, thus, decreasing its impedance, since the ribbons may be made to have larger cross-sectional areas than individual nanotubes.





FIG. 3

illustrates a method of making certain embodiments of NTRCM devices


100


. A first intermediate structure


302


is created or provided. In the illustrated embodiment, the structure


302


includes a silicon substrate


110


having an insulating layer


109


(such as silicon dioxide) and a silicon nitride layer (Si


3


N


4


)


108


that defines a plurality of supports


102


. In this instance, the supports


102


are formed by rows of patterned silicon nitride, though many other arrangements are possible, such as a plurality of columns. Conductive traces


104


extend between supports


102


. In this instance, the traces


104


are shown as essentially contacting the supports


102


, but other arrangements are possible as are other geometries; for example, spaces may exist between trace


104


and support


102


and trace


104


may be fashioned as a wire or may have non-rectangular transverse, cross-sections, including triangular or trapezoidal. Sacrificial layers


304


are disposed above the traces


104


so as to define one planar surface


306


with the upper surface of the supports


102


. This planar surface, as will be explained below, facilitates growth of a matted nanotube layer of certain embodiments.




Once such a structure


302


is created or provided, the upper surface


306


receives a catalyst


308


. For example, under certain embodiments, a catalyst metal


308


, containing iron (Fe), molybdenum (Mo), cobalt or other metals, is applied by spin-coating or other application techniques to create a second intermediate structure


310


.




A matted layer


312


of nanotubes is then grown into a non-woven fabric of single-walled carbon nanotubes (SWNTs) to form a third intermediate structure


314


. For example, the second intermediate structure


310


may be placed into an oven and heated to a high temperature (for example, about 800-1200° C.) while gases containing a carbon source, hydrogen and inert gas, such as argon or nitrogen, are flowed over the upper surface. This environment facilitates the generation or growth of the matted layer or film


312


of single-walled carbon nanotubes. The layer


312


is primarily one nanotube thick and the various tubes adhere to one another via Van der Waals forces. Occasionally, one nanotube grows over the top of another, though this growth is relatively infrequent due to the growth tendencies of the material. Under some embodiments (not shown), the catalyst


308


may be patterned to assist in growing the nanotubes with specific densities either more or less dense as is desired. When conditions of catalyst composition and density, growth environment, and time are properly controlled, nanotubes can be made to evenly distribute over a given field that is primarily a monolayer of nanotubes. Proper growth requires control of parameters including but not limited to catalyst composition and concentration, functionialization of the underlying surface, spin coating parameters (length and RPM), growth time, temperature and gas concentrations.




A photoresist may then be applied to the layer


312


and patterned to define ribbons in the matted layer of nanotubes


312


. The ribbon patterns cross (for example, perpendicularly) the underlying traces


104


. The photoresist is removed to leave ribbons


101


of non-woven nanotube fabric lying on planar surface


306


to form fourth intermediate structure


318


.




The fourth intermediate structure


318


has portions


320


of its underlying sacrificial layer


304


exposed as shown. The structure


318


is then treated with an acid, such as HF, to remove the sacrificial layer


304


, including the portion under the ribbons


101


, thus forming an array


322


of ribbons


101


suspended over traces


104


and supported by supports


102


.




Subsequent metalization may be used to form addressing electrodes, e.g.,


112


shown in FIG.


1


.




One aspect of the above technique is that the various growth, patterning, and etching operations may use conventional techniques, such as lithographic patterning. Currently, this may entail feature sizes (e.g., width of ribbon


101


) of about 180 nm to as low as 130 nm, but the physical characteristics of the components are amenable to even smaller feature sizes if manufacturing capabilities permit.




As will be explained below, there are many possible ways of creating the intermediate structures or analogous structures described above.

FIG. 4

, for example, shows one way to create the first intermediate structure


302






A silicon wafer


400


is provided with an oxide layer


402


. The oxide layer is preferably a few nanometers in thickness but could be as much 1 μm. A silicon nitride (Si


3


N


4


) layer


404


is deposited on top of the oxide surface


402


. The silicon nitride layer is preferably at least


30


nm thick.




The silicon nitride layer


404


is then patterned and etched to generate cavities


406


to form support structure


407


. With modern techniques the cavity width may be about 180 nm wide or perhaps smaller. The remaining silicon nitride material defines the supports


102


(e.g., as row, or perhaps columns).




A covering


408


of n-doped silicon is then deposited to fill the cavities


406


. The covering


408


for exemplary embodiments may be about 1 μm thick but may be as thin as 30 nm.




The covering


408


is then processed, for example by self-flattening of thick silicon layers or by annealing, to produce a planar surface


306


, discussed above, to form structure


411


. In the case of self-flattening, reactive ion-etching (RE) with end-point detection (EPD) may be utilized until the upper surface


410


of the etched silicon nitride is reached.




The structure


411


is then oxidized to form and define sacrificial layers


304


of SiO


2


about 10-20 nm deep into planar surface


306


.




The unconverted, remaining portions of silicon form traces


104


.





FIG. 5

shows another method that may be used to create the NTRCM devices


100


of certain embodiments. A support structure


407


, like that described in connection with

FIG. 4

, is provided. A layer


514


of n-doped silicon is then added using a CVD process, sputtering or electroplating. Under certain embodiments, layer


514


is added to be about half the height of the Si


3


N


4


supports


102


.




After the layer


514


is added, an annealing step is performed to yield a planarized surface


306


to form a structure


411


like that described above. The annealing step causes the silicon of layer


514


to flow into the cavities


406


.




Like that described in connection with

FIG. 4

, the structure


411


is then oxidized to form and define sacrificial layers


304


of SiO


2


about


10


-


20


nm deep into planar surface


306


.





FIG. 6

shows another approach for forming an alternative first intermediate structure


302


′. In this embodiment, a silicon substrate


600


is covered with a layer


602


of silicon nitride having a height


604


of at least 30 nm.




The silicon nitride layer


602


is then patterned and etched to generate spacings


606


and to defined supports


102


. The etching process exposes a portion


608


of the surface of silicon substrate


600


.




The exposed silicon surface


608


is oxidized to generate a silicon dioxide (SiO


2


) layers


610


having a thickness of a few nm. These layers


610


eventually insulate traces


104


analogously to the way insulating layer


109


did for the above described structures


302


.




Once the insulating layers


610


have been created, the traces


104


may be created in any of a variety of manner.

FIG. 6

illustrates the processing steps of

FIGS. 4-5

used to create such traces to illustrate this point.





FIG. 7

shows another approach for forming first intermediate structure


302


. A silicon substrate


700


having a silicon dioxide layer


702


and a silicon nitride layer


704


receives a patterned photoresist layer


706


. For example, a photoresist layer may be spin-coated on layer


704


and subsequently exposed and lithographically developed.




Reactive ion etching (RIE) or the like may then be used to etch the Si


3


N


4


layer


704


to form cavities


708


and to define supports


102


.




Afterwards, n-doped silicon


710


may be deposited in the cavities


708


. Under certain embodiments silicon is deposited to a height about equal to the height


712


of the Si


3


N


4


supports


102


.




The photoresist


706


and silicon


710


on top of the photoresist


706


are then stripped away to form an intermediate structure


411


like that described above.




The structure


411


is then oxidized to generate the sacrificial SiO


2


layers


304


.





FIG. 8

shows another approach for forming first intermediate structure


302


. Under this approach, a starting structure


800


is provided having a lowest silicon layer


802


with a lowest silicon dioxide layer


804


on top of it. A second silicon layer


806


is on top of layer


804


and a second silicon dioxide layer


808


is on top of the second silicon layer


806


.




The top silicon dioxide (SiO


2


) layer


808


is patterned by photolithography to create an RIE mask


810


. The mask is used to etch the exposed portions


812


of second silicon layer


806


down to the first silicon dioxide layer


804


. This etching creates cavities


814


and defines traces


104


.




The cavities


814


are filled and covered with silicon nitride (Si


3


N


4


)


816


.




The Si


3


N


4


covering


816


is backetched with RIE to the same height


818


as the remaining portions of the SiO


2


layer


806


covering the n-doped silicon electrodes


104


(which form the sacrificial layer


304


).





FIG. 9

shows an approach for forming an alternative first intermediate structure


302


″. Under this approach, a structure like


407


(shown in

FIG. 4

, but not

FIG. 9

) is provided. In this instance, the Si


3


N


4


supports


102


have a height of about 30 nm. A thin layer of metal


902


is deposited on top of the Si


3


N


4


supports


102


and on top of the exposed portions SiO


2


at the bottom of the cavities


904


as depicted by item


903


. Metal


902


and


903


form temporary electrodes. A layer of n-doped silicon


906


may then be deposited or grown by electroplating, covering the electrode


903


until the silicon


906


achieves a height


908


at the top of the support


102


and contacting electrode


902


. The growth process may be controlled by the onset of a current flow between the lower and upper metal electrodes


902


,


3


.




The exposed metal electrodes


902


may then be removed by wet chemical methods or dry chemical methods. This forms an intermediate structure


411


′ like the structure


411


described above, but with a buried electrode


903


, as an artifact of the silicon growing process.




The structure


411


′ is then oxidized to form sacrificial layers


304


at the exposed portions of silicon, as described above. For example, the layers


304


may be grown to a thickness of about 10 nm.





FIG. 10

shows another approach for forming first intermediate structure


302


. A silicon substrate


1002


having a layer of silicon dioxide


1004


on top of it and a second layer


1006


of silicon (n-doped) on top of layer


1004


is used as a starting material. A mask layer


1008


is photolithographically patterned on top of layer


1006


.




Using nitridization techniques, exposed portions


1010


of n-doped silicon layer


1006


are chemically converted to Si


3


N


4


supports


102


. The unconverted portions of layer


1006


form traces


104


.




The mask


1008


is removed forming a structure


411


like that described above.




The exposed portions


1012


of silicon surface are then oxidized to form the SiO


2


sacrificial layers


304


.





FIG. 11

shows an approach for forming an alternative first intermediate structure


302


′″ Under this approach a silicon substrate


1102


is layered with a thin film


1104


of Si


3


N


4


as a starting structure. On top of the silicon nitride layer


1104


, n-doped silicon is added and lithographically patterned, by RIE, to form traces


104


.




The surfaces of traces


104


are oxidized to form the SiO


2


layer


1106


which acts as an alternative form of sacrificial layer


304


′.




The structure is overgrown with Si


3


N


4




1108


and back etched to form a planar surface


306


and to form alternative first intermediate structure


302


′″. As will be evident to those skilled in the art, under this approach, when the sacrificial layer is subsequently removed, traces


104


will be separated from supports


102


. Other variations of this technique may be employed to create alternative transverse cross-sections of trace


104


. For example, the traces


104


may be created to have a rounded top, or to have a triangular or trapezoidal cross section. In addition, the cross section may have other forms, such as a triangle with tapered sides.




As was explained above, once a first intermediate structure is formed, e.g.,


302


, a matted nanotube layer


312


is provided over the planar surface


306


of the structure


302


. In preferred embodiments, the non-woven fabric layer


312


is grown over the structure through the use of a catalyst


308


and through the control of a growth environment. Other embodiments may provide the matted nanotube layer


312


separately and apply it directly over the structure


302


. Though structure


302


under this approach preferably includes the sacrificial layer to provide a planar surface to receive the independently grown fabric, the sacrificial layer may not be necessary under such an approach.




Because the growth process causes the underside of such nanotubes to be in contact with planar surface


306


of intermediate structure


302


, they exhibit a “self-assembly” trait as is suggested by FIG.


12


. In particular, individual nanotubes tend to adhere to the surface on which they are grown whenever energetically favorable, such that they form substantially as a “monolayer.” Some nanotubes may grow over another so the monolayer is not expected to be perfect. The individual nanotubes do not “weave” with one another but do adhere with one another as a consequence of Van der Waals forces.

FIG. 12

is an approximate depiction of an actual nanotube non-woven fabric. Because of the small feature sizes of nanotube, even modern scanning electron microscopy cannot “photograph” an actual fabric without loss of precision; nanotubes have feature sizes as small as 1-2 nm which is below the precision of SEM.

FIG. 12

for example, suggests the fabric's matted nature; not clear from the figure, however, is that the fabric may have small areas of discontinuity with no tubes present. Each tube typically has a diameter 1-2 nm (thus defining a fabric layer about 1-2 nm) but may have lengths of a few microns but may be as long as 200 microns. The tubes may curve and occasionally cross one another. Tubes attach to one another via Van der Waals forces.




In certain embodiments, nanotubes grow substantially unrestrained in the x- and y-axis directions, but are substantially restricted in the z-axis (perpendicular to page of

FIG. 12

) as a consequence of the self-assembly trait. Other embodiments may supplement the above approach to growing matte


312


with the use of field-oriented or flow-oriented growth techniques. Such supplementation may be used to further tailor growth such that any growth in one planar axis (e.g. the -x-axis) is retarded. This allows for a more even coverage of the desired area with a planar interwoven monolayer coating of nanotubes with a controllable density.




A plan view of the matted nanotube layer


312


with underlying silicon traces


104


is shown in FIG.


13


.




As explained above, once the matted nanotube layer


312


is provided over the surface


306


, the layer


312


is patterned and etched to define ribbons


101


of nanotube fabric that cross the supports


102


. The sacrificial layer is then removed (e.g., with acid) forming the array


322


described above in connection with FIG.


3


. Because the matted layer of nanotubes


312


form a non-woven fabric that is not a contiguous film, etchants or other chemicals may diffuse between the individual nanotube “fibers” and more easily reach the underlying components, such as the sacrificial layer.




Subsequent metalization may be used to form addressing electrodes, e.g.,


112


shown in

FIG. 1

, as outlined above. Other embodiments use nanotube technology to implement addressing of memory cells instead of using metallized electrodes


112


and addressing lines (not shown).




More specifically, under certain embodiments described above, nanotubes are used to form NTRCM arrays. Certain embodiments use nanotube technology, whether in individual wire or belt form, to implement addressing logic to select the memory cell(s) for reading or writing operations. This approach furthers the integration of nanotube technology into system design and may provide beneficial functionality to higher-level system design. For example, under this approach the memory architecture will not only store memory contents in non-volatile manner but will inherently store the last memory address.




The nanotube-based memory cells have bistability characterized by a high ratio of resistance between “0” and “1” states. Switching between these states is accomplished by the application of specific voltages across the nanotube belt or wire and the underlying trace, in which at least one of the memory cell elements is a nanotube or a nanotube ribbon. In one approach, a “readout current” is applied and the voltage across this junction is determined with a “sense amplifier.” Reads are non-destructive, meaning that the cell retains its state, and no write-back operations are needed as is done with DRAM.





FIG. 14

depicts a branching binary select system, or decoder,


1400


. As will be explained below, decoder


1400


may be implemented with nanotubes or nanotube ribbon technology. Moreover, the decoder may be constructed on the same circuit component as a nanotube memory cell array, e.g., NTRCM or NTWCM.




A perpendicular intersection of two lines


1404


and


1406


depicted as a dot


1402


indicates a junction of two nanotubes or nanotube ribbons. In this regard, the interaction is analogous to a “pass transistor” found in CMOS and other technology, in which the intersection may be opened or closed.




Locations such as


1420


where one nanotube or nanotube ribbon may cross another but which are not intended to create a crossbar junction may be insulated from one another with a lithographically patterned insulator between the components.




For the sake of clarity, the decoder illustrated is for a 3-bit binary address carried on addressing lines


1408


. Depending on the value of the encoding the intersections (dots) will be switched to create only one path through which sensing current I may pass to select lines


1418


.




To use this technique, a “dual rail” representation


1408


of each bit of the binary address is fashioned externally so that each of the address bits


1410


is presented in true and complementary form. Thus, line


1406


may be the logical true version of address line


1408




a


and line


1407


may be the logical complement of address line


1408




a.


The voltage values of the representation


1408


are consistent with that needed to switch a crossbar junction to the “1” or “0” state as described above.




In this fashion an address


1408


may be used to supply a sense current I to a bit or row of bits in an array, e.g., to nanotubes or nanotube ribbons. Likewise, the same approach may be used to sense a given trace, for example, selecting specific array column(s) to read sense from in conjunction with selecting a row. Thus this approach may be used for X and/or Y decoding both for reading and for writing operations.




Certain embodiments of the invention provide a hybrid technology circuit


1500


, shown in

FIG. 15. A

core memory cell array


1502


is constructed using NTWCM or NTRCM, and that core is surrounded by semiconductor circuits forming X and Y address decoders


1504


and


1506


; X and Y buffers


1508


and


1510


; control logic


1512


and output buffers


1514


. The circuitry surrounding the NTWCM or NWBCM core may be used for conventional interfacing functions, including providing read currents and sensing output voltages.




In other embodiments, the X and Y address decoders


1504


and


1506


may be substituted with the nanotube wire or belt addressing technique discussed above. In these embodiments the core would include memory cells and addressing logic.




In certain embodiments, the hybrid circuit


1500


may be formed by using a nanotube core (having either just memory cells or memory cells and addressing logic) and by implementing the surrounding circuitry using a field programmable gate array. The core and gate array circuitry may be contained in a single physical package if desired. Or, they may be packaged separately. For example, a hermitically packaged nanotube circuit (having memory or memory and addressing logic) may be combined with a PLD/FPGA/ASIC in which the I/O interfacing logic is contained. The resulting compact chipset provides access to the benefits of the NT memory for the user of the product, while maximizing the use of “off-the-shelf” technologies, which may be utilized on an as-needed basis by the manufacturer.





FIG. 16

depicts one possible implementation


1600


of the hybrid technology. A FPGA chip


1602


containing the buffering and control logic (described above) is connected via conducting traces on a (perhaps multilayer) printed circuit board (PCB)


1604


to a nanotube (NT) chip


1606


containing the memory cells and addressing logic.




This particular embodiment is suggested to conform to the PCI bus standard, typical of today's personal computers. Other passive circuitry, such as capacitors, resistors, transformers, etc. (not pictured) would also be necessary to conform to the PCI standard. A front-side bus speed of 200 MHz-400 MHz is annotated, suggesting the kinds of external clock speeds such a chipset might run at. This speed is limited by the PCB interconnects and FPGA/PLD/ASIC speed, and also the chip packages, not the NT memory cell speed.




OTHER EMBODIMENTS




Besides carbon nanotubes other materials with electronic and mechanical properties suitable for electromechanical switching could be envisioned. These materials would have properties similar to carbon nanotubes but with different and likely reduced tensile strength. The tensile strain and adhesion energies of the material must fall within a range to allow bistability of the junction and electromechanical switching properties to exist within acceptable tolerances.




For the purpose of integrating CMOS logic for addressing two approaches can be envisioned. In the first embodiment the nanotube array will be integrated before metallization but after ion implantation and planarization of the CMOS logic devices. A second method involves growth of the nanotube arrays before fabrication of the CMOS devices involving ion implementation and high temperature annealing steps. Upon completion of these steps the final metallization of both the nanotube ribbons and the CMOS devices will proceed using standard and widely used protocols.




Electrodes consisting of n-doped silicon on top of some metal or semiconductor line can also be envisioned. This will still provide rectifying junctions in the ON state so that no multiple current pathways exist.




In addition to rectifying junctions, there are other widely accepted and used methods to prevent the occurrence of electrical crosstalk (i.e. multiple current pathways) in crossbar arrays. Tunnel barriers on top of the static, lithographically fabricated electrodes prevent the formation of ohmic ON states. No leakage currents at zero bias voltage will occur but a small bias voltage has to be applied for the charge carriers to overcome this barrier and tunnel between the crossing lines.




Methods to increase the adhesion energies through the use of ionic, covalent or other forces can be envisioned to alter the interactions with the electrode surfaces. These methods can be used to extend the range of bistability with these junctions.




Nanotubes can be functionalized with planar conjugated hydrocarbons such as pyrenes which may then aid in enhancing the internal adhesion between nanotubes within the ribbons.




Certain of the above aspects, such as the hybrid circuits and the nanotube technology for addressing, are applicable to individual nanotubes (e.g., using directed growth techniques, etc.) or to nanotube ribbons.




It will be further appreciated that the scope of the present invention is not limited to the above-described embodiments but rather is defined by the appended claims, and that these claims will encompass modifications of and improvements to what has been described.



Claims
  • 1. A hybrid memory system, comprising:a memory cell core circuit having an array of electromechanical memory cells, in which each cell is a crossbar junction at least one element of which is a nanotube or a nanotube ribbon; an access circuit for providing array addresses to the memory cell core circuit to select at least one corresponding cell, the access circuit being constructed of semiconductor circuit elements.
  • 2. The hybrid memory system of claim 1 wherein the memory cell core circuit further includes a first and second decoder, the first decoder being responsive to the array addresses to select a row of cells within the array, and the second decoder being responsive to the array addresses to select at least one column of cells in the array.
  • 3. The hybrid circuit of claim 1 wherein the memory cell core circuit is constructed as a first individual integrated circuit chip and wherein the access circuit is not included in said chip.
  • 4. The hybrid circuit of claim 1 wherein the memory cell core circuit is constructed as a first individual integrated circuit chip and wherein the access circuit is a second integrated circuit chip in communication with the first chip.
  • 5. The hybrid circuit of claim 1 wherein the access circuit further provides a PCI bus interface.
  • 6. The hybrid circuit of claim 2 wherein the first and second decoders are constructed with crossbar junctions, one element of which is a nanotube or a nanotube ribbon.
CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS

This application is related to the following applications, all of which are filed on the same date that this application is filed, all of which are assigned to the assignee of this application, and all of which are incorporated by reference in their entirety: Electromechanical Memory Having Cell Selection Circuitry Constructed with Nanotube Technology (U.S. patent application Ser. No. 09/915/093); and Electromechanical Memory Array Using Nanotube Ribbons and Method for Making Same (U.S. patent application Ser. No. 09/915,173).

US Referenced Citations (207)
Number Name Date Kind
3448302 Shanefield Jun 1969 A
3740494 Dunand et al. Jun 1973 A
3892890 Watanabe et al. Jul 1975 A
4324814 Reichert Apr 1982 A
4378629 Bozlev et al. Apr 1983 A
4495551 Yoder Jan 1985 A
4510016 Chi et al. Apr 1985 A
4524431 Haken et al. Jun 1985 A
4673474 Ogawa Jun 1987 A
4694427 Miyamoto et al. Sep 1987 A
4701842 Olnowich Oct 1987 A
4707197 Hensel et al. Nov 1987 A
4758534 Derkits, Jr. et al. Jul 1988 A
4819212 Nakai et al. Apr 1989 A
4845533 Pryor et al. Jul 1989 A
4853893 Eaton, Jr. et al. Aug 1989 A
4876667 Ross et al. Oct 1989 A
4888630 Paterson Dec 1989 A
4901121 Gibson et al. Feb 1990 A
4903090 Yokoyama Feb 1990 A
4939556 Eguchi et al. Jul 1990 A
4947226 Huang et al. Aug 1990 A
4979149 Popovic et al. Dec 1990 A
4985871 Catlin Jan 1991 A
5010037 Lin et al. Apr 1991 A
5031145 Lever Jul 1991 A
5032538 Bozler et al. Jul 1991 A
5051956 Burns Sep 1991 A
5057883 Noda Oct 1991 A
5089545 Pol Feb 1992 A
5155561 Bozler et al. Oct 1992 A
5161218 Catlin Nov 1992 A
5168070 Luth Dec 1992 A
5175597 Cachier et al. Dec 1992 A
5184320 Dye Feb 1993 A
5196396 Lieber Mar 1993 A
5198390 MacDonald et al. Mar 1993 A
5198994 Natori Mar 1993 A
5252835 Lieber et al. Oct 1993 A
5290715 Pardya Mar 1994 A
5316979 MacDonald et al. May 1994 A
5346683 Green et al. Sep 1994 A
5412785 Skruhak et al. May 1995 A
5424054 Bethune et al. Jun 1995 A
5426070 Shaw et al. Jun 1995 A
5444421 Carroll et al. Aug 1995 A
5444651 Yamamoto et al. Aug 1995 A
5453970 Rust et al. Sep 1995 A
5456986 Majetich et al. Oct 1995 A
5475341 Reed Dec 1995 A
5479172 Smith et al. Dec 1995 A
5482601 Ohshima et al. Jan 1996 A
5517194 Carroll et al. May 1996 A
5521602 Carroll et al. May 1996 A
5533061 Smith et al. Jul 1996 A
5538916 Kuroi et al. Jul 1996 A
5547748 Ruoff et al. Aug 1996 A
5553099 Carroll et al. Sep 1996 A
5563424 Yang et al. Oct 1996 A
5586286 Santeler et al. Dec 1996 A
5589692 Reed Dec 1996 A
5590078 Chatter Dec 1996 A
5592642 Thomas Jan 1997 A
5592643 Thomas Jan 1997 A
5592644 Thomas Jan 1997 A
5608246 Yeager et al. Mar 1997 A
5608888 Purcell et al. Mar 1997 A
5623638 Andrade Apr 1997 A
5626670 Varshney et al. May 1997 A
5626812 Ebbesen et al. May 1997 A
5640133 MacDonald et al. Jun 1997 A
5640343 Gallagher et al. Jun 1997 A
5650958 Gallagher et al. Jul 1997 A
5651126 Bailey et al. Jul 1997 A
5652856 Santeler et al. Jul 1997 A
5699317 Sartore et al. Dec 1997 A
5716708 Lagow Feb 1998 A
5719073 Shaw et al. Feb 1998 A
5721862 Sartore et al. Feb 1998 A
5739057 Tiwari et al. Apr 1998 A
5747180 Miller et al. May 1998 A
5751156 Muller et al. May 1998 A
5753088 Olk May 1998 A
5780101 Nolan etal. Jul 1998 A
5781717 Wu et al. Jul 1998 A
5793697 Scheuerlein Aug 1998 A
5799209 Chatter Aug 1998 A
5802583 Yeager et al. Sep 1998 A
5838165 Chatter Nov 1998 A
5840435 Lieber et al. Nov 1998 A
5841692 Gallagher et al. Nov 1998 A
5846849 Shaw et al. Dec 1998 A
5847454 Shaw et al. Dec 1998 A
5847565 Narayanan Dec 1998 A
5850089 Varshney et al. Dec 1998 A
5850231 Orimoto et al. Dec 1998 A
5858862 Westwater et al. Jan 1999 A
5875451 Joseph Feb 1999 A
5878840 Tessum et al. Mar 1999 A
5887272 Sartore et al. Mar 1999 A
5897945 Lieber et al. Apr 1999 A
5903010 Flory et al. May 1999 A
5909624 Yeager et al. Jun 1999 A
5914553 Adams et al. Jun 1999 A
5925465 Ebbesen et al. Jul 1999 A
5928450 Russell Jul 1999 A
5930164 Zhu Jul 1999 A
5939785 Klonis et al. Aug 1999 A
5946228 Abraham et al. Aug 1999 A
5946930 Anthony Sep 1999 A
5973444 Xu et al. Oct 1999 A
5985446 Lagow Nov 1999 A
5993697 Cohen et al. Nov 1999 A
5994733 Nishioka et al. Nov 1999 A
5997832 Lieber et al. Dec 1999 A
6025618 Chen Feb 2000 A
6031711 Tennent et al. Feb 2000 A
6031756 Gimzewski et al. Feb 2000 A
6183714 Smalley et al. Feb 2000 B1
6036774 Lieber et al. Mar 2000 A
6038060 Crowley Mar 2000 A
6038637 Berube et al. Mar 2000 A
6044008 Choi Mar 2000 A
6048740 Hsu et al. Apr 2000 A
6049856 Bolyn Apr 2000 A
6052263 Gill Apr 2000 A
6052313 Atsumi et al. Apr 2000 A
6060724 Flory et al. May 2000 A
6062931 Chuang et al. May 2000 A
6063243 Zettl et al. May 2000 A
6064107 Yeh et al. May 2000 A
6069380 Chou et al. May 2000 A
6072718 Abraham et al. Jun 2000 A
6083624 Hiura Jul 2000 A
6087293 Carnahan et al. Jul 2000 A
6088760 Walker et al. Jul 2000 A
6104633 Abraham et al. Aug 2000 A
6105381 Ghoshal Aug 2000 A
6108725 Chatter Aug 2000 A
6128214 Kuekes et al. Oct 2000 A
6136160 Hrkut et al. Oct 2000 A
6138219 Soman et al. Oct 2000 A
6146227 Mancevski Nov 2000 A
6156256 Kennel Dec 2000 A
6159620 Heath et al. Dec 2000 A
6159742 Lieber et al. Dec 2000 A
6165890 Kohl et al. Dec 2000 A
6166948 Parkin et al. Dec 2000 A
6177703 Cunningham Jan 2001 B1
6190634 Lieber et al. Feb 2001 B1
6198655 Heath et al. Mar 2001 B1
6203814 Fisher et al. Mar 2001 B1
6203864 Zhang et al. Mar 2001 B1
6212597 Conlin et al. Apr 2001 B1
6219212 Gill et al. Apr 2001 B1
6221330 Moy et al. Apr 2001 B1
6226722 Shippy et al. May 2001 B1
6231744 Ying et al. May 2001 B1
6231980 Cohen et al. May 2001 B1
6232706 Dai et al. May 2001 B1
6233665 Bolyn May 2001 B1
6237130 Soman et al. May 2001 B1
6239547 Uemura et al. May 2001 B1
6256767 Kuekes et al. Jul 2001 B1
6259277 Tour et al. Jul 2001 B1
6262469 Le et al. Jul 2001 B1
6300205 Fulford et al. Oct 2001 B1
6314019 Kuekes et al. Nov 2001 B1
6320428 Atsumi et al. Nov 2001 B1
6322713 Choi et al. Nov 2001 B1
6325909 Li et al. Dec 2001 B1
6331209 Jang et al. Dec 2001 B1
6346413 Fodor et al. Feb 2002 B1
6348295 Griffith et al. Feb 2002 B1
6348700 Ellenbogen et al. Feb 2002 B1
6350488 Lee et al. Feb 2002 B1
6358756 Sandhu et al. Mar 2002 B1
6361861 Gao et al. Mar 2002 B2
6362073 Kim Mar 2002 B2
6051866 Shaw et al. Apr 2002 A1
6380434 Chiang Apr 2002 B1
6400088 Livingston et al. Jun 2002 B1
6400091 Deguchi et al. Jun 2002 B1
6406776 D'Evelyn Jun 2002 B1
6417606 Nakamoto et al. Jul 2002 B1
6420726 Choi et al. Jul 2002 B2
6421271 Gogl et al. Jul 2002 B1
6422450 Zhou et al. Jul 2002 B1
6423583 Avouris et al. Jul 2002 B1
6426134 Lavin et al. Jul 2002 B1
20010023123 Kim Sep 2001 A1
20010023986 Mancevski Sep 2001 A1
20020055010 Gao et al. May 2002 A1
20020061441 Ogura et al. May 2002 A1
20020068170 Smalley et al. Jun 2002 A1
20020081380 Dillon et al. Jun 2002 A1
20020081787 Kohl et al. Jun 2002 A1
20020088938 Colbert et al. Jul 2002 A1
20020090331 Smalley et al. Jul 2002 A1
20020092983 Colbert et al. Jul 2002 A1
20020092984 Colbert et al. Jul 2002 A1
20020096634 Colbert et al. Jul 2002 A1
20020098135 Smalley et al. Jul 2002 A1
20020102193 Smalley et al. Aug 2002 A1
20020102194 Smalley et al. Aug 2002 A1
20020102196 Smalley et al. Aug 2002 A1
20020102353 Mauthner et al. Aug 2002 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (78)
Number Date Country
0 217 023 Apr 1987 EP
0 269 225 Jun 1988 EP
0 269 225 Jun 1988 EP
441409 Jul 1988 EP
441409 Jul 1988 EP
0 269 716 Dec 1988 EP
0 296 716 Dec 1988 EP
0 315 392 May 1989 EP
0 315 392 May 1989 EP
426282 Aug 1990 EP
0 613 130 Aug 1994 EP
0 665 187 Aug 1995 EP
0 688 618 Aug 1995 EP
0 688 618 Aug 1995 EP
758023 Jul 1996 EP
1209123 Sep 1996 EP
0 665 187 Dec 1997 EP
0 947 466 Oct 1999 EP
0 989 579 Mar 2000 EP
0 945 402 Sep 2000 EP
1 046 613 Oct 2000 EP
1225613 Oct 2000 EP
1 052 520 Nov 2000 EP
1 054 249 Nov 2000 EP
1 059 266 Dec 2000 EP
1 061 040 Dec 2000 EP
1 061 043 Dec 2000 EP
1 061 044 Dec 2000 EP
1 061 544 Dec 2000 EP
1 061 555 Dec 2000 EP
1 069 206 Jan 2001 EP
1 072 693 Jan 2001 EP
1132920 Feb 2001 EP
1 100 106 May 2001 EP
1 100 297 May 2001 EP
1205436 Nov 2001 EP
2364933 Jul 2001 GB
11-011917 Jan 1999 JP
WO 9502709 Jan 1995 WO
WO 9638410 Dec 1996 WO
WO 9641043 Dec 1996 WO
WO 9722971 Dec 1996 WO
WO 9709272 Mar 1997 WO
WO 9731139 Aug 1997 WO
WO 9743473 Nov 1997 WO
WO 9826871 Jun 1998 WO
WO 9839250 Sep 1998 WO
WO 9839251 Sep 1998 WO
WO 9842620 Oct 1998 WO
WO 9848456 Oct 1998 WO
WO 9906618 Feb 1999 WO
WO 0009443 Jul 1999 WO
WO 0008650 Aug 1999 WO
WO 9947570 Sep 1999 WO
WO 9948810 Sep 1999 WO
WO 9958748 Nov 1999 WO
WO 9965821 Dec 1999 WO
WO 0009443 Feb 2000 WO
WO 0017101 Mar 2000 WO
WO 0019494 Apr 2000 WO
WO 0063115 Apr 2000 WO
WO 0073204 May 2000 WO
WO 0103208 Jun 2000 WO
WO 0044094 Jul 2000 WO
WO 00048195 Aug 2000 WO
WO 0118246 Aug 2000 WO
WO 0123303 Aug 2000 WO
WO 0103208 Jan 2001 WO
WO 0237500 May 2001 WO
WO 0219420 Aug 2001 WO
WO 0238496 Nov 2001 WO
WO 0242204 Nov 2001 WO
WO 0248701 Dec 2001 WO
WO 0248822 Dec 2001 WO
WO 02054505 Dec 2001 WO
WO 02059898 Jan 2002 WO
WO 02060812 Jan 2002 WO
WO 02060813 Jan 2002 WO
Non-Patent Literature Citations (132)
Entry
Tans, Sander J., “Room-temperature transistor based on a single carbon nanotube,” Nature, May 1998, vol. 393, pp. 49-52.
Dillon, Anne C., “A Simple and Complete Purification of Single-Walled Carbon Nanotube Materials,” Advanced Materials, 1999, vol. 11, pp. 1354-1358.
Cleland, A.N., “Single-crystal aluminum nitride nanomechanical resonators,” Applied Physics Letters, Sep. 24, 2001, vol. 79, pp. 2070-2072.
Ramsperger, U., “Fabrication and lateral electronic transport measurements of gold nanowires,” Applied Physics Letters, Jan. 1, 2001, vol. 78, pp. 85-87.
Calleja, M., “Fabrication of gold nanowires on insulating substrates by field-induced mass transport,” Applied Physics Letters, Oct. 8, 2001, vol. 79, pp. 2471-2473.
Kluth, P., “Fabrication of epitaxial CoSi2 nanowires,” Applied Physics Letters, Aug. 6, 2001, vol. 79, pp. 824-826.
Zhang, Y., “Formation of metal nanowires on suspended single-walled carbon nanotubes,” Applied Physics Letters, Nov. 6, 2000, vol. 77, pp. 3015-3017.
Berry, A.D., “Fabrication of GaAs and InAs wires in nanochannel gas,” Applied Physics Letters, Nov. 4, 1996, vol. 69, pp. 2846-2848.
Li, Jian-Long, “Spontaneous formation of ordered indium nanowire array on Si(001),” Applied Physics Letters, Oct. 22, 2001, vol. 79, pp. 2826-2828.
Jorritsma, J., “Fabrication of large arrays of metallic nanowires on V-grooved substrates,” Applied Physics Letters, Sep. 4, 1995, vol. 67, pp. 1489-1491.
Sekiba, Daiichiro, “Fabrication of stable nanopatterns on metals,” Applied Physics Letters, Sep. 30, 2002, vol. 81, pp. 2632-2634.
Yin, A. J., “Fabrication of highly ordered metallic nanowire arrays by electrodeposition,” Applied Physics Letters, Aug. 31, 2001, vol. 79, pp. 1039-1041.
He, J. Z., “Dispersion, refinement, and manipulation of single silicon nanowires,” Applied Physics Letters, Mar. 11, 2002, vol. 80, pp. 1812-1814.
Franklin, Nathan R., “Integration of suspended carbon nanotube arrays into electronic devices and electromechanical systems,” Applied Physics Letters, Jul. 29, 2002, vol. 81, pp. 913-915.
Homma, Yoshikazu, “Growth of suspended carbon nanotube networks on 100-nm-scale silicon pillars,” Applied Physics Letters, Sep. 16, 2002, vol. 81, pp. 2261-2263.
Yenilmez, Erhan, “Wafer scale production of carbon nanotube scanning probe tips for atomic force microscopy,” Applied Physics Letters, Mar. 25, 2002, vol. 80, pp. 2225-2227.
Sax, Harald, “Polysilicon Overfill Etch Back Using Wet Chemical Spin-process Technology,” 7 pgs.
Dinaro, Joanna, “Analysis of an Elementary Reaction Mechanism for Benzene Oxidation in Supercritical Water, Combustion Institute,” 2000, vol. 28, pp. 1529-1536.
Monthioux, M., “Sensitivity of single-wall carbon nanotubes to chemical processing: an electron microscopy investigation,” Carbon, 2001, vol. 39, pp. 1251-1272.
Hou, P. X., “Multi-step purification of carbon nanotubes,” 2002 Elsevier Science Ltd., Mar. 8, 2001, vol. 40, pp. 81-85.
Avouris, P., “Carbon nanotube electronics,” Carbon, 2002, vol. 40, pp. 429-445.
Chen, Bin, “Heterogeneous Single-Walled Carbon Nanotube Catalyst Discovery and Optimization,” Chemical Materials, Dec. 7, 2001, vol. 14, pp. 1891-1896.
Maurin, I., “Carbon Miscibility in the Boron Layers of the MgB2 Superconductor,” Chemical Materials, 2002, pp. A-D.
Hyeon-Lee, Jingyu, “Aero-Sol-Gel Synthesis of Nanostructured Silica Powders,” Chemical Materials, 1997, vol. 9, pp. 2400-2403.
McEuen, Paul L., Single-Walled Carbon Nanotube Electronics, to be published in the inaugural issue of the IEEE Transactions on Nanotechnology (2002), 9 pgs.
Dürkop, T., “Nanotubes are High Mobility Semiconductors,” Department of Physics, University of Maryland, 4 pgs.
Choi, Hee Cheul, “Spontaneous Reduction of Metal Ions on the Sidewalls of Carbon Nanotubes,” J. Amer. Chem. Soc., May 7, 2002, pp. A-B.
Zheng, Bo, “Efficient CVD Growth of Single-Walled Carbon Nanotubes on Surfaces Using Carbon Monoxide Precursor,”Nano Letters, 2002, pp. A-D.
Deng, S. Z., “Synthesis of silicon carbide nanowires in a catalyst-assisted process,” Chemical Physics Letters, Apr. 26, 2002, vol. 356, pp. 511-514.
Zhang, R. Q., “Silicon nanotubes: Why not?,” Chemical Physics Letters, 2002, vol. 364, pp. 251-258.
Lei, Y., “Fabrication, characterization and Raman study of TiO2 nanowire arrays prepared by anodic oxidative hydrolysis of TiCl3,” Chemical Physics Letters, 2001, vol. 338, pp. 231-236.
Zheng, M. J., “Fabrication and optical properties of large-scale uniform zinc oxide nanowire arrays by one-step electrochemical deposition technique,” Chemical Physics Letters, 2002, vol. 363, pp. 123-128.
O'Connell, Michael J., “Reversible water-solubilization of single-walled carbon nanotubes by polymer wrapping,” Chemical Physics Letters, 2001, vol. 342, pp. 265-271.
Huang, Houjin, “Purification and alignment of arc-synthesis single-walled carbon nanotube bundles,” Chemical Physics Letters,2002, vol. 356, pp. 567-572.
Kong, Jing, “Chemical vapor deposition of methane for single-walled carbon nanotubes,” Chemical Physics Letters, 1998, vol. 292, pp. 567-574.
Bergbreiter, David E., “Using Soluble Polymers To Recover Catalysts and Ligands,” Chemical Reviews, Mar. 5, 2002, pp. A-AM.
Roucoux, Alain, “Reduced Transition Metal Colloids: A Novel Family of Reusable Catalysts?,” Chemical Reviews, Jan. 30; 2002, pp. A-V.
Yoshida, Jun-ichi, “Tag Strategy for Separation and Recovery,” Chemical Reviews, Mar. 18, 2002, pp. A-X.
De Vos, Dirk E., “Ordered Mesoporous and Microporous Molecular Sieves Functionalized with Transition Metal Complexes as Catalysts for Selective Organic Transformations,” Chemical Reviews, Jan. 31, 2002, pp. A-Z.
Connelly, Neil G., “Chemical Redox Agents for Organometallic Chemistry,” Chemical Reviews, Jan. 9, 1996, vol. 96, pp. 877-910.
Dequesnes, Marc, “Calculation of pull-in voltages for carbon-nanotube-based nanoelectromechanical switches,” Nanotechnology, Jan. 22, 2002, vol. 13, pp. 120-131.
Serp, Philippe, “Chemical Vapor Deposition Methods for the Controlled Preparation of Supported Catalytic Materials,” Chemical Reviews, Apr. 10, 2002, pp. A-AR.
Diehl, Michael R., “Self-Assembled, Deterministic Carbon Nanotube Wiring Networks,” Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. , 200, vol. 41, pp. 353-356.
Wind, S. J., “Localized and Directed Lateral Growth of Carbon Nanotubes from a Porous Template,” IBM T.J. Watson Research Center, 17 pgs.
Wind, S. J., “Fabrication and Electrical Characterization of Top Gate Single-Wall Carbon Nanotube Field-Effect Transistors,” IBM T. J. Watson Research Center, 14 pgs.
Harutyunyan, Avetik R., “CVD Synthesis of Single Wall Carbon Nanotubes under “Soft” Conditions,” Nano Letters, Feb. 25, 2002, pp. A-F.
Massot, L., “Electrodeposition of carbon films from molten alkaline fluoride media,” Electrochimica Acta, Jan. 28, 2002, vol. 47, pp. 1949-1957.
Heinze, S., “Carbon Nanotubes as Schottky Barrier Transistors,” Physical Review Letters, Sep. 2, 2002, vol. 89, pp. 106801-1 through 106801-4.
Duan, Xiangfeng, “Indium phosphide nanowires as building blocks for nanoscale electronic and optoelectronic devices,” Nature, Jan. 4, 2001, vol. 409, pp. 66-69.
Chen, Robert J., “Noncovalent Sidewall Functionalization of Single-Walled Carbon Nanotubes for Protein Immobilization,” J. Amer. Chem. Soc., 2001, vol. 123, pp. 3838-3839.
Puntes, Victor F., “Synthesis of hcp-Co Nanodisks,” J. Amer. Chem. Soc., 2002, vol. 124, pp. 12874-12880.
An, Lei, “Synthesis of Nearly Uniform Single-Walled Carbon Nanotubes Using Identical Metal-Containing Molecular Nanoclusters as Catalysts,” j. Amer. Chem. Soc., 2002, vol. (?), total of 4 pgs.
Cassell, Alan M., “Directed Growth of Free-Standing Single-Walled Carbon Nanotubes,” American Chemical Society, Jun. 21, 1999, vol. 121, pp. 7975-7976.
Bahr, Jeffrey, L., “Functionalization of Carbon Nanotubes by Electrochemical Reduction of Aryl Diazonium Salts: A Bucky Paper Electrode,” American Chemical Society, 2001, vol. 123, pp. 6536-6542.
Fruchart, O., “Vertical self-organization of epitaxial magnetic nanostructures,” Journal of Magnetism and Magnetic Materials, 2002, vol. 239, pp. 224-227.
Zhang, J., “Fabrication and photoluminescence of ordered GaN nanowire arrays,” Journal of Chemical Physics, Oct. 1, 2001, vol. 115, pp. 5714-5717.
Dubois, S., “Fabrication and properties of arrays of superconducting nanowires,” Journal of Materials Research March 1999, vol. 14, pp. 665-671.
Liu, Z.Q., “Synthesis of α-SiO2 nanowires using Au nanoparticle catalysts of a silicon substrate,” Journal of Materials Research, Mar. 2001, vol. 16, pp. 683-686.
Lei, Y, Fabrication, characterization, and photoluminescence properties of highly ordered TiO2 nonowire arrays, J. Material Research, Apr. 2001, vol. 16, pp. 1138-1144.
Li, Y., “Fabrication of Highly ordered ZnO nanowire arrays in anodic alumina membranes,” J. Materials Research, Nov. 2000, vol. 15, p. 2305-2308.
Sellmyer, D.J., “Magnetism of Fe, Co and Ni nanowires in self-assembled arrays,” J. of Physics: Condensed Matter, (2000) vol. 13, pp. R433-R460.
Fan, Hongyou, “Multiphased assembly of nanopourous silica particles,” Journal of Non-Crystalline Solids (2001) vol. 285, pp. 71-78.
Franklin, Nathan R., “Integration of suspended carbon nanotube arrays into electronic devices and electromechanical systems,” Applied Physics Letters, Jul. 29, 2002, vol. 81, No. 5, 913-915.
Kong, Jing, “Synthesis of individual single-walled carbon nanotubes on patterned silicon wafers,” Nature, Oct. 29, 1998, vol. 395, pp. 878-881.
Duan, Xiangfeng, “Nonvolatile Memory and Programmable Logic from Molecule-Gated Nanowires,” Nano Letters, 2002, pp. A-D.
Fuhrer, M.S., “High-Mobility Nanotube Transistor Memory,” Nano Letters, 2002, vol. 2, No. 7, pp. 755-759.
Radosavljević, M., Novolatile Molecular Memory Elements Based on Ambipolar Nanotube Field Effect Transistors, Nano Letters, 2002, vol. 2, pp. 761-764.
Derycke, V., “Catalyst-Free Growth of Ordered Single-Walled Carbon Nanotube Networks,” Nano Letters, 2002, pp. A-D.
Joselevich, Ernesto, “Vectorial Growth of Metallic and Semiconducting Single-Wall Carbon Nanotubes,” Nano Letters, xxxx, vol. 0, pp. A-E.
Javey, Ali, “Carbon Nanotube Transistor Arrays for Multistage Complementary Logic and Ring Oscillators,” Nano Letters, 2002, pp. A-D.
Robertson, John, “Section 11. Non-Crystalline Carbon, Properties and Prospects for Non-Crystalline Carbons,” Journal of Non-Crystalline Solids 299-302, 2002, pp. 798-804.
Ci, Lijie, “Double Wall Carbon Nanotubes Promoted by Sulfur in a Floating Iron Catalyst CVD System,” Chemical Physics Letters 359, Jun. 13, 2002, pp. 63-67.
Gromov, A., “Purification of Carbon Nanotubes,” Caramel Workshop, Jan. 23, 2002, pp. 1-13.
Cui, Yi, “Functional Nanoscale Electronic Devices Assembled Using Silicon Nanowire Building Blocks,” Science, Feb. 2, 2001, vol. 291, pp. 851-853.
Wang, Suhua, Thermal Oxidation of Cu2S Nanowires: a Template Method for the Fabrication of Mesoscopic CuxO (×= 1,2) Wires, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 2002, vol. 4, pp. 3425-3429.
Untiedt, C., Fabrication and Characterization of Metallic Nanowires, Physical Review B, Jul. 15, 1997, vol. 56, No. 4, pp. 2154-2160.
Marsen, Bjorn, “Fullerene-Structured Nanowires of Silicon,” Physical Review B, Oct. 15, 1999, vol. 60, No. 16, pp. 11593-11600.
Berber, Savas, “Unusually High Thermal Conductivity of Carbon Nanotubes,” Physical Review Letters, May 15, 2000, vol. 84, No. 20, pp. 4613-4616.
Yao, Zhen, “High-Field Electrical Transport in a Single-Wall Carbon Nanotubes,” Physical Review Letters, Mar. 27, 2000, vol. 84, No. 13, pp. 2641-2944.
Zhang, Y.F., “Liquid Phase Synethesis of Carbon Nanotubes,” Physica B 323, 2002, pp. 293-295.
Dresselhaus, M.S., “Raman Spectroscopy on One Isolated Carbon Nanotube,” Physica B 323, 2002, pp. 15-20.
Heinze, S., “Carbon Nanotubes as Schottky Barrier Transistors,” Physical Review Letters, Sep. 2, 2002, vol. 89, No. 10, 106801-1—106801-4.
Fu, Qiang, “Electrodeposition of Carbon Films from Various Organic Liquids,” Surface & Coatings Technology 124, 2000, pp. 196-200.
Hernadi, K., “Reactivity of Different Kinds of Carbon During Oxidative Purification of Catalytically Prepared Carbon Nanotubes,”, Solid State Ionics 141-142, 2001, pp. 203-209.
Colomer, J. F., “Different Purification Methods of Carbon Nanotubes Produced by Catalytic Synthesis,” Synthetic Metals 103, 1999, pp. 2482-2483.
Dalton, A.B., “A Functional Conjugated Polymer to Process, Purify and Selectively Interact with Single Wall Carbon Nanotubes,” Synthetic Metals 121, 2001, pp. 1217-1218.
Tat, Kerk Wai, “Preparation and Characterization of Cobalt/Silica Core-Shell Magnetic Nanoparticles,” Dept. Chem., National University of Singapore 2000/2001, pp. 1-5.
Shipley, Microposit® XP-90104A E-Beam Resist, Preliminary Product Information, pp. 1-2.
Smalley, R. E., Foreword (Publication unknown), Jan. 2001.
Dresselhaus, Mildred S., Preface (Publication unknown) Jan. 2001.
Advanced Semiconductor Engineering, Inc., Substrate Design 420L BGA 35*35, Dwg. No. K-I-0420, 2 pages.
Interated Device Technology, Inc., DA Package Design, Sep. 25, 1997, 2 pages.
Integrated Device Technology, Inc. BG Package Outline, Sep. 18, 1994.
Pimenta, M.A., “Diameter dependence of the Raman D-band in isolated single-wall carbon nanotubes,” Physical Review B, vol. 64 pp. 04140-1-04140-4.
Duan, Xiangfeng, Nonvolatile Memory and Programmable Logic from Molecule-Gated Nanowires, Nano Letters, Mar. 2002, pp. 1-4.
Introduction and Historical Perspective, Chapter 1, pp. 1-48.
Modern CMOS Technology, Chapter 2, pp. 49-92.
Crystal Growth, Wafer Fabrication and Basic Properties of Silicon Wafers, Chapter 3, pp. 93-149.
“Double Sided 4Mb SRAM Coupled Cap PBGA Card Assembly Guide.” International Business Machines Corp. (IBM), 1998.
Tyagi et al. “A 130nm Generation Logic Technology Featuring 70nm Transistors, Dual Vt Transistors and 6 Layers of Cu Interconnects.” Portland Technology Development.
“Preliminary: 8Mb (256Kx36 & 512Kx18) and 4Mb (128Kx36 & 256Kx18) [IBM0418A8CBLBB, IBM0418A4CBLBB, IBM0436A8CBLBB, IBM0436A4CBLBB].” International Business Machines Corp. (IBM), 1998.
Wei, Chenguy et al. “Temperature and Stain-Rate Dependent Plastic Deformation of Carbon Nanotube.”
“Package Mechanicals for USAR ICs.” USAR Systems, Inc., 1998.
Dipert, Brian. “Exotic Memories, Diverse Approaches.” EDN Magazine. Apr. 26, 2001, 56-70.
Duan, Xiangfeng. “Indium Phosphide Nanowires as Building Blocks for Nanoscale Electronic and Optoelectronic Devices.” Nature (2001); 409: 66-69.
Yang. “A Highly Performance 180 nm Generation Logic Technology.” Portland Technology Development.
Dai, Hongjie. “Controlled Chemical Routes to Nanotube Architectures, Physics, and Devices.” The Journal of Physical Chemistry B (1999); 103: 11246-11255.
Callaby, D. Roy et al. “Solid State Memory Study Final Report.” National Media Lab, Feb. 1994.
Cui, Yi. “Doping and Electrical Transport in Silicon Nanowires.” The Journal of Physical Chemistry B (2000); vol. 104, No. 22: 5213-5216.
Li, Mingtao et al. “Direct Three-dimensional Patterning Using Nanoimprint Lithography.” Applied Physics Letters (2000); vol. 78, No. 21: 3322-3324.
“8 Mb Synchronous Communication SRAM (IBM0418A86LQKA, IBM0418A86SQKA, IBM0436A86IQKA, IBM436A86SQKA).” International Business Machines Corp. (IBM), 1999.
Dipert, Brian. “Memory Cards: Designing with a Full Deck.” EDN Magazine. May 25, 2000.
Schönenberger, Christian et al. “Physics of Multiwall Carbon Nanotubes.” Physics World. Apr. 4, 2000.
Whatmore, Roger W. “Nanotechnology.” Ingenia. Feb., 2000.
“Nonochip NC800SX, 0.8 Gbyte Molecular Memory IC (R/W), Nanochip NC200SX, 0.2 Gbyte Molecular Memory IC (R/W), Nanochip NCM4510SX, Molecular Array Read/write Engine, Low Voltage Thermal Actuated, Dynamic Media Series M2, Nanochip NC4525DX, A/D-D/A Interface, Preliminary Specifications, Advance Information, (C) 1996-2000 Nanochip Document NCM2230500.”
Odom, Teri Wang et al. “Atomic Structure and Electronic Properties of Single-Walled Carbon Nanotubes,” Nature (1998); 391: 62-64.
Ouyang, Min. “Atomically Resolved Single-Walled Carbon Nanotube Intramolecular Junctions.” Science (2001); 291: 97-100.
Odom, Teri Wang et al. “Magnetic Clusters on Single-Walled Carbon Nanotubes: The Kondo Effect in a One-Dimensional Host.” Science (2000); 290: 1549-1552.
Wong, Eric et al. “Nanobeam Mechanics: Elasticity, Strength, and Toughness of Nonorods and Nanotubes.” Science (1997); 277: 1971-1975.
Hu, Jiangtao et al. “Controlled Growth and Electrical Properties of Heterojunctions of Carbon Nanotubes and Silicon Nanowires.” Nature (1999); 399: 48-51.
Rueckes, Thomas et al. “Carbon Nanotube-Based Nonvolatile Random Access Memory for Moleclar Computing.” Science (2000); 289: 94-7.
Kim, Philip et al. “Nanotube Nanotweezers.” Science (1999); 286: 2148-2150.
Huang, Yu et al. “Directed Assembly of One-Dimensional Nanostructures into Functional Networks.” Science (2001); 291: 630-33.
Cui, Yi et al. “Functional Nanoscale Electronic Devices Assembled Using Silicon Nanowire Building Blocks.” Science (2001); 291: 851-53.
Oullette, Jennifer. “Exploiting Molecular Self-Assembly.” The Industrial Physicist. American Institute of Physics, Dec. 2000.
Peng, Shu et al. “Chemical Control of Nanotube Electronics.” Nanotechnology (2000); 11: 57-60.
“The Ultimate Memory Guide.” Kingston Technology (1998).
Morales, Alfredo et al. “A Laser Ablation Method for the Synthesis of Crystalline Semiconductor Nanowires.” Science (1998); 279: 208-11.
Franklin, Nathan R. and Hongjie Dai, “An Enhanced CVD Approach to Extensive Nanotube Networks with Directionality.” Advanced Materials (2000): 890-894.
Kong, Jing; Chongwu Zhou; Erhan Yenilmez; Hongjie Dai. “Alkaline metal-doped n-type semiconducting nanotubes as quantum dots.” ApplieDPhysics Letters (Dec. 11, 2000): 3977-3979.
Tombler, Thomas W.; Chongwu Zhou; Jing Kong; Hongjie Dai, “Gating individual nanotubes and crossed with scanning probes.” Applied Physics Letters (Apr. 24, 2000): 2412-2414.
Zhou, Chongwu: et al. “Electrical measurements of individual semiconducting single-walled carbon nanotubes of various diameters.” Applied Physics Letters (Mar. 20, 2000): 1597-1599.