This application is the U.S. national phase of International Application No. PCT/IB2010/052558, filed 9 Jun. 2010, which designated the U.S. and claims priority to CH Application No. 01034/09, filed 3 Jul. 2009, the entire contents of each of which are hereby incorporated by reference.
The present invention relates to power generation and cogeneration of heat and power.
To face global warming and growing energy problems, concerted efforts are required. The rising demand for electrical power and the necessity to decrease fossil fuel consumption push for development of new power generating systems, with higher efficiencies and reduced environmental impacts.
An attractive way to reach a more rational energy conversion of fossil or bio fuels is the decentralized power generation and cogeneration of heat and power. Among major weaknesses of existing small systems at the building level, consisting mainly of internal combustion or Stirling engines, are low electrical efficiency, high maintenance costs, together with noise and vibration. Recently introduced mini gas turbines in the range of 40 to 120 kWel reduce the three latter problems but at an even lower efficiency. Moreover they are not available in the smaller power range typical of many multi-family houses. Molten Carbon Fuel Cells (MCFC) and Solid Oxide Fuel Cells (SOFC) are emerging as major candidates to alleviate all the above mentioned drawbacks.
However the fuel cannot be entirely converted electrochemically in the fuel cell alone and part of it is combusted downstream of the fuel cell with low energy efficiency. One existing approach suggests to further improve the electrical efficiency by combining the fuel cell with a gas turbine in a hybrid system.
Both MCFC and SOFC are suitable partners for gas turbines, even though SOFC are considered to be the best candidates for these applications because of their higher working temperature (around 950° C.). The first applications and simulations show a potential of efficiency of the order of 60% or higher which would make decentralized generation as or more efficient than large combined cycle power plants.
In spite of the advantages of this hybrid technology, many technical barriers have to be overcome to develop a highly efficient system. Fuel cell and gas turbines are rather different power generation systems: the operational mode of a standalone gas turbine is dynamic, whereas the fuel cell is static. The matching between the two systems is crucial. It is essential to guarantee a safe and stable operation point for the fuel cell, to avoid structural or physical stack damages. Fuel cell pressurization represents one of the greatest challenges.
Considering the SOFC, two different classes are nowadays available: the tubular and planar geometry. Planar geometry is today the most efficient and compact of the two and object of much research, however it is the more problematic under pressurized conditions.
The Hybrid Cycle can be classified into two classes with respect to the integration level between the gas turbine and the fuel cell [1].
The first and simplest Hybrid Cycle class consists in maintaining the two systems separate and uses a heat exchanger as interface. An example is shown in
To increase the system efficiency it is necessary to fully integrate gas turbines and fuel cells. This is the direction taken in the second Hybrid Cycle class in which research efforts are more concentrated, and different design solutions have been developed. In the most common solution (
The world's first SOFC/GT hybrid system, including a pressurized tubular SOFC module integrated with a micro turbine/generator, was delivered to Southern California Edison for operation at the Irvine's National Fuel Cell Research Center. This system was the first-ever demonstration of the SOFC/gas turbine hybrid concept and reached 53% electric efficiency for 220 kW [2].
Other experimental applications have been developed, but all are restricted to the tubular SOFC stacks. Only recently, Lim [3] operates for a few hours a pressurized Hybrid Cycle, according with the
Many studies have assessed the feasibility and operating condition of a variety of integrated high efficiency design alternatives. Palsonn [4] showed the possibility to reach, also with a low pressure ratio (typical of small to medium size dynamic turbomachinery), more than 65% of efficiency. Massardo [5] analyzed pressurized and atmospheric systems with efficiency up to 75%.
Other approaches are related to the Hybrid System design with a thermo-economic analysis. Autissier [6] demonstrated the possibility to reach 70% efficiency for 6700 $/kW with a 50 kW pressurized system.
A different way to fully integrate a gas turbine with fuel cells is proposed by Tsujikawa [7, 8, 9]. He proposed a Hybrid Cycle with the fuel cell operating at atmospheric pressure and the gas turbine driven in an Inverted Brayton-Joule Cycle (
The Inverted Brayton-Joule Cycle, which has been fully detailed by Wilson [10], is characterized by the expansion in the turbine before the compression. This technology is not in use today for power generation purposes due to the lower efficiency obtainable with respect to a traditional gas turbine because of the smaller power density. Inoue [11] and Tanaka [12] showed performance evaluations based on simulations and experimental measurements of a gas turbine based on Inverted Brayton-Joule Cycle.
The Tsujikawa system layout is shown in
Summarizing, the research in the last years fully demonstrates the potential of the fuel cell-gas turbine hybrid system. However limits of this technology are also clear: to reach a high efficiency it is necessary to fully integrate the two power generation systems which is difficult as operating the fuel cell under pressurized conditions creates new technical difficulties.
The Inverted Brayton-Joule based proposals partially solve the problems. In fact with these systems it is possible to operate the fuel cell under atmospheric conditions and to fully integrate the gas turbine. However the limit of these solutions is a lower system efficiency with regard to a pressurized system.
The present invention offers several advantages with respect to the state of the art, in particular: the system efficiency is substantially increased, the fuel cell operates close or under atmospheric conditions and the carbon dioxide is separated. One embodiment of the invention is presented in
In Brayton-Joule Cycles (traditional or inverted), the compressor uses a large part of the turbine power (typically over the 60%). The new proposal Hybrid Cycle, based on a fuel cell operating at or close to atmospheric pressure coupled with a gas turbine driven in an Inverted Brayton-Joule Cycle, enables to reduce substantially the turbine power used by the compressor.
The idea is to capitalize on the intrinsic oxygen-nitrogen separation characteristic of the fuel cell electrolyte by sending to the Inverted Brayton-Joule Cycle only the flow from the anode, which is free of nitrogen. After the combustion, if the remaining fuel (not utilized in the fuel cell, typically 15 to 25%) is oxidized using pure oxygen, the anodic flow consists only of carbon dioxide and water. The water can easily be condensed and separated in the cooling process between the turbine and the compressor. The latter mainly compresses carbon dioxide whereas the water is pumped up separately. As gas compression is much more demanding in terms of mechanic power than liquid pumping, the reduced gas flow leads to significant savings of power with respect to traditional systems.
To benefit as much as possible from this gain, supplementary water is preferably injected in the anodic flow either in the combustor and/or in the fuel processing unit and/or elsewhere before the turbine inlet. As a consequence, the anodic flow steam injection rate is optimized and usually increased compared to the standard hybrid fuel cell-gas turbine system.
An additional advantage of the present invention is that the carbon dioxide can be separated for other uses of storage and can be compressed to a compatible state for transportation and sequestration.
The advantages of the power savings and the carbon dioxide separation, although reduced, are maintained in case that the combustion is done with air instead of pure oxygen, as combustion concerns only a small part of the total fuel converted in the system.
All the heat exchangers required by the system can be organized in one or more heat exchange networks. The energy recovered by cooling down the cathodic flow, and/or the fuel cell, and/or the combustor, and/or the flow coming out the turbine before the compressor unit (compressor and pump), and/or the exhausted flows, and/or other units, and/or other complementary cycles, can be used to supply heat to the fuel processing unit, and/or to produce steam injected in the combustor, and/or to gasification units and/or to other complementary cycles (e.g. Rankine Cycle, ORC-ORC cycle), and/or for cogeneration purposes.
Hereafter are presented some extensions at the above presented innovation.
A system according with the above described invention in which the supplementary steam injected in the anodic flow is generated at high pressure and is expanded in a turbine before to be injected in the anodic flow (
A system according with the above described invention in which the flow coming out the fuel cell cathode is driven in a gas turbine based on an Inverted Brayton-Joule Cycle (
The Extension 2 can be combined with the Extension 1.
A system according with the above described invention in which the cathodic flow coming out the fuel cell is expanded below the atmospheric pressure in a turbine, than it is cooled down and is mixed up with the anodic flow coming out the separator before the compressor inlet. The compressor compresses the mixture between cathodic and the anodic flow up to the atmospheric pressure. Both the anodic and the cathodic flows are driven into two gas turbines, based on an Inverted Brayton-Joule Cycle, that share the same compressor (
The compressor can be driven by the anodic turbine and/or by the cathodic turbine and/or by an electric motor.
The Extension 3 can be combined with the Extension 1, 2.
By extension the present invention can also be applied to a concept combining traditional Brayton-Joule Cycle and Inverted Brayton-Joule Cycle. The advantage of reducing compression power is then reduced but still more advantageous than the traditional design. However this configuration can make easier the system start up.
The invention can be applied with advantage every time that in the gas turbine-fuel cell Hybrid Cycle there is one expansion before one compression. Therefore application of the discussed idea can be generalized also in the case in which the turbine expands from above atmospheric pressure (e.g. use of a pressurized fuel cell) or from below the atmospheric pressure.
In example
The Extension 4 can be combined with the Extension 1, 2, 3.
The present invention can be applied in a gas turbine-fuel cell hybrid cycle with any kind or size of Fuel Cell.
The Extension 5 can be combined with the Extension 1, 2, 3, 4.
The present invention can be applied independently to the class or size of the involved turbomachinery, including multi-stage compressions and expansions, intercooling between the compressions, re-heating between the expansions, monoshaft and/or multishaft configurations.
The Extension 6 can be combined with the Extension 1, 2, 3, 4, 5.
The present invention can be applied to convert any kind of fuel and can be integrated with any kind of fuel processing.
The Extension 7 can be combined with the Extension 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6.
The present invention can be applied to convert the syngas produced by any gasification process. In that case, the invention will allow for different integration with the gasification process:
The Extension 8 can be combined with the Extension 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7.
A system according with the above described invention in which the oxygen necessary to oxidize the amount of fuel unconverted in the fuel cell can be added in the anodic flow either in the combustion chamber and/or in the fuel processing and/or elsewhere before the combustion chamber.
The alternatives to separate pure oxygen from air include:
The Extension 9 can be combined with the Extension 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
1034/09 | Jul 2009 | CH | national |
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind | 371c Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
PCT/IB2010/052558 | 6/9/2010 | WO | 00 | 1/26/2012 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2011/001311 | 1/6/2011 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
20020142208 | Keefer | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20030143448 | Keefer | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20050048345 | Meacham | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20070099038 | Galloway | May 2007 | A1 |
20070163822 | Grieve | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20080187789 | Ghezel-Ayagh | Aug 2008 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
1 564 830 | Aug 2005 | EP |
2001-043875 | Feb 2001 | JP |
WO 0195409 | Dec 2001 | WO |
WO 02078109 | Oct 2002 | WO |
Entry |
---|
International Search Report for PCT/IB2010/052558, mailed Jun. 30, 2011. |
Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority for PCT/IB2010/052558, mailed Jun. 30, 2011. |
Swiss Search Report for CH No. 01034/09, dated Aug. 27, 2009. |
Tsujikawa, Y. et al., “Part-Load Performance of MCFC/APT Hybrid Power System”, Proceedings of The ASME Turbo Expot 2008, (Jan. 1, 2008), pp. 349-355. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20120117979 A1 | May 2012 | US |