Disc drill bits are one type of drill bit used in earth drilling applications, particularly in petroleum or mining operations. In such operations, the cost of drilling is significantly affected by the rate the disc drill bit penetrates the various types of subterranean formations. That rate is referred to as rate of penetration (“ROP”), and is typically measured in feet or inches per hour. As a result, there is a continual effort to optimize the design of disc drill bits to more rapidly drill specific formations and reduce these drilling costs.
Disc drill bits are characterized by having disc-shaped cutter heads rotatably mounted on journals of a bit body. Each disc has an arrangement of cutting elements attached to the outer profile of the disc. Disc drill bits can have three discs, two discs, or even one disc. An example of a three disc drill bit 101, shown in
In this patent, inserts 107 on discs 105 are conically shaped and used to primarily generate failures by crushing the earth formation to cut out wellbore 151. During drilling, a force (referred to as weight on bit (“WOB”)) is applied to disc drill bit 101 to push it into the earth formation. The WOB is translated through inserts 107 to generate compressive failures in the earth formation. In addition, as drill string 113 is rotated in one direction, as indicated by arrow 131, bit body 103 rotates in the same direction 133 as drill string 113, which causes discs 105 to rotate in an opposite direction 135.
Referring now to
Although disc bits have been used successfully in the prior art, further improvements in the drilling performance may be obtained by improved cutting configurations.
In one aspect, the present invention relates to a drill bit. The drill bit includes a bit body and a journal depending from the bit body. The drill bit further includes a disc rotatably mounted on the journal and PDC cutting elements disposed on the disc.
In another aspect, the present invention relates to a cutting structure to be used with a disc drill bit. The cutting structure includes a shearing portion arranged in a shearing configuration, wherein the shearing portion comprises PDC. The cutting structure further includes a compressive portion arranged in a compressive configuration. The shearing portion and the compressive portion of the cutting structure are formed into a single body.
In another aspect, the present invention relates to a method of designing a drill bit, wherein the drill bit includes a bit body, a journal depending from the bit body, a disc rotatably mounted to the bit body, first radial row of cutting elements, and second radial of row cutting elements. The method includes identifying a relative velocity of the drill bit, and determining a compressive configuration of the first radial row of cutting elements based on the relative velocity. The method further includes determining a shearing configuration of the second radial row cutting elements based on the relative velocity of the drill bit. Then, the first radial row cutting elements are arranged on the disc of the drill bit based on the compressive configuration, and the second radial row cutting elements are arranged on the disc of the drill bit based on the shearing configuration.
Other aspects and advantages of the invention will be apparent from the following description and the appended claims.
As used herein, “compressive configuration” refers to a cutting element that primarily generates failures by crushing the earth formation when drilling.
As used herein, “shearing configuration,” refers to a cutting element that primarily generates failures by shearing the earth formation when drilling.
In one or more embodiments, the present invention relates to a disc drill bit having at least one disc and at least one cutting element disposed on the disc to be oriented in a either a compressive configuration or a shearing configuration. More particularly, the cutting element oriented in either configuration can be made of polycrystalline diamond compact (“PDC”). The compact is a polycrystalline mass of diamonds that are bonded together to form an integral, tough, high-strength mass. An example of a PDC cutter for drilling earth formation is disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 5,505,273, and is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety.
Referring now to
In some embodiments, cutting elements of the first radial row are oriented in the compressive configuration may be comprised of tungsten carbide, PDC, or other superhard materials, and may be diamond coated. Cutting elements of the first radial row are designed to compress and penetrate the earth formation, and may be of conical or chisel shape. The second radial row cutting elements have PDC as the cutting faces, which contact the earth formation to cut out the borehole. Also, cutting elements of the second radial row are oriented to shear across the earth formation.
Because the cutting elements of the first radial row on the discs of the disc drill bit are in a compressive configuration, the cutting elements primarily generate failures by crushing the earth formation when drilling. Additionally, because the cutting elements of the first radial row are more suited to compressively load the earth formation, significant shearing of the earth formation by the cutting elements of the first radial row should be avoided. Too much shearing may prematurely wear and delaminate the cutting elements of the first radial row. To arrange the cutting elements of the first radial row in a compressive configuration, the cutting elements should be oriented on the disc drill bit to have little or no relative velocity at the point of contact with respect to borehole. If the cutting elements of the first radial row have no relative velocity with the point of contact of the borehole, the cutting elements will generate compression upon the earth formation with minimal shearing occurring across the borehole.
Referring now to
Vfirstradialrow=(ωbit×Rbit)+(ωdisc×Rdisc) [Eq. 1]
When the bit body is in one direction of rotation, the disc is put into an opposite direction of rotation. If such values are inserted into the formula then, either the value ωdisc or the value ωbit would be negative. As cutting elements of first radial row 207 on the disc then passes through a contact point 871 with the borehole, the two corresponding velocity components, bit body velocity 851 and disc velocity 853, can be of equal magnitude and cancel out one another, resulting in a relative velocity of zero for Vfirst radial row. With little or no relative velocity then, the cutting elements of first radial row 207 located at contact point 871 would therefore generate almost entirely compressive loading upon the earth formation with minimal shearing occurring across the borehole. Thus, the cutting elements of the first radial row should be designed to contact and compress the borehole most at contact point 871. When the cutting elements of the first radial row can no longer maintain little or no relative velocity, they should disengage with the earth formation to minimize shearing action. With the determination of the direction of the relative velocity, the compressive configuration can be optimized to improve the compressive action of the cutting elements of the first radial row.
In contrast to cutting elements of first radial row 207, cutting elements of second radial row 209 are oriented to use the relative velocity to improve their shearing cutting efficiency. Referring still to
Referring now to
In one or more embodiments of the present invention, the discs in the disc drill bit may be positively or negatively offset from the bit body. Referring now to
The positive and negative offset of the discs ensures that only an appropriate portion of the PDC cutting elements and inserts are cutting the borehole at any given time. If -the entire surface of the disc was effectively drilling the borehole, the discs and drill would be prone to stalling in rotation. The offset arrangement of the discs assures that only a selected portion of the disc is cutting. Also, offsets force the discs to shear while penetrating the earth formation. The present invention is particularly well adapted to be used with negative offset.
Referring now to
Disc drill bit 501 further includes a webbing 511 disposed on discs 505. Webbing 511 is arranged on the outside radius of discs 505 and is adjacent to first radial row cutting 507 of cutting elements. Optionally, webbing 511 can be an integral part of discs 505, as shown in
When drilling earth formations, webbing 511 can provide structural support for first radial row 507 of cutting elements to help prevent overloading. The compressive forces distributed on the cutting elements of first radial row 507 could be translated to webbing 511 for support. The height of webbing 511 can be adjusted such that the depth of cut of the cutting elements of first radial row 507 is limited. Having a low webbing height would allow the cutting elements of first radial row 507 to take a deeper cut when drilling into the earth formation, as compared to the depth of cut a high webbing height would allow. The adjustable webbing height further prevents overloading of the first radial row 509 of cutting elements.
Furthermore,
Embodiments of the present invention do not have to include the features of the webbing arranged on the discs and the single cutting structure formed from the first and second radial row cutting elements. Embodiments are shown with the webbing alone, and embodiments are shown with the single cutting structure alone. However, other embodiments can be created to incorporate both the webbing and the single cutting structure or exclude both the webbing and the single cutting structure. Those having ordinary skill in the art will appreciate that the present invention is not limited to embodiments which incorporate the webbing and the single cutting structure.
Further, those having ordinary skill in the art will appreciate that the present invention is not limited to embodiments which incorporate only two rows of cutting elements. Other embodiments may be designed which have more than two rows of cutting elements. Referring now to
Referring still to
In some embodiments, the cutting elements of the first radial row are oriented in the compressive configuration and may be comprise tungsten carbide, PDC, or other superhard materials, and may be diamond coated. The cutting elements of the first radial row cutting elements are designed to compress and penetrate the earth formation, and may be of conical or chisel shape. Preferably, the cutting elements of the second radial row have PDC as the cutting faces, which contact the earth formation to cut out the borehole. The cutting elements of the second radial row may have a substantially planar cutting face formed of PDC and are oriented to shear across the earth formation. Similarly, the cutting elements of the third radial row have cutting faces which are comprised of PDC. The cutting elements of the third radial row shear across the earth formation to enlarge the borehole to full diameter.
In one or more embodiments of the present invention, to assist in the shearing action, the cutting elements of the second and third radial rows may be oriented with a negative or positive rake angle. Referring now to
In
In
Those having ordinary skill in the art will appreciate that other embodiments of the present invention may be designed with arrangements other than three discs rotatably mounted on the bit body. Other embodiments may be designed to incorporate only two discs, or even one disc. Also, embodiments may be designed to incorporate more than three discs. The number of discs on the disc drill bit is not intended to be a limitation of the present invention.
As seen in roller cone drill bits, two cone drill bits can provide a higher ROP than three cone drill bits for medium to hard earth formation drilling. This concept can also be applied to disc drill bits. Compared with three disc drill bits, two disc drill bits can provide a higher indent force. The “indent force” is the force distributed through each cutting element upon the earth formation. Because two disc drill bits can have a fewer amount of total cutting elements disposed on the discs than three disc drill bits, with the same WOB, two disc drill bits can then provide a higher indent force. With a higher indent force, two disc drill bits can then provide a higher ROP. Two disc drill bits can also allow larger cutting elements to be used on the discs, and provide more flexibility in the placement of the nozzles. Further, the discs on two disc drill bits can be offset a larger distance than the discs of three disc drill bits. In the event a two disc drill bit is designed, an angle from about 165 to 180 degrees is preferred to separate the discs on the disc drill bit.
Additionally, those having ordinary skill in the art that other embodiments of the present invention may be designed which incorporates discs of different sizes to be disposed on the disc drill bit. Embodiments may be designed to incorporate discs to be rotatably mounted to the disc drill bit, in which the discs vary in size or thickness in relation to each other. The size of the discs is not intended to be a limitation of the present invention.
Referring now to
In the embodiments shown, compressive portion 705 of cutting structure 701 may be comprised of tungsten carbide, PDC, or other superhard materials, and may be diamond coated. Compressive portion 705, which may be of a conical or chisel shape, is designed to compress and penetrate the earth formation. Shearing portion 703 of cutting structure 701 has PDC as the cutting face which contacts the earth formation to cut out the borehole. Shearing portion 703 is designed to shear across the earth formation.
While the invention has been described with respect to a limited number of embodiments, those skilled in the art, having benefit of this disclosure, will appreciate that other embodiments can be devised which do not depart from the scope of the invention as disclosed herein. Accordingly, the scope of the invention should be limited only by the attached claims.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
334594 | Maloy | Jan 1886 | A |
1026886 | Thomas | May 1912 | A |
1124241 | Hughes | Jan 1915 | A |
1124242 | Hughes | Jan 1915 | A |
1124243 | Hughes | Jan 1915 | A |
1131701 | Hughes | Mar 1915 | A |
1143273 | Hughes | Jun 1915 | A |
1143274 | Hughes | Jun 1915 | A |
1143275 | Hughes | Jun 1915 | A |
1182533 | Double | May 1916 | A |
1195208 | Griffin | Aug 1916 | A |
1327913 | Hughes | Jan 1920 | A |
1348419 | Hughes | Aug 1920 | A |
1374867 | Wadsworth | Apr 1921 | A |
1402684 | Thomas | Jan 1922 | A |
1747908 | Seifert | Feb 1930 | A |
1812475 | Gildersleeve et al. | Jun 1931 | A |
1850358 | Scott | Mar 1932 | A |
1877225 | Capeliuschnicoff | Sep 1932 | A |
1896243 | MacDonald | Feb 1933 | A |
2049543 | Kammerer | Aug 1936 | A |
2121202 | Killgore | Jun 1938 | A |
2174587 | Love | Oct 1939 | A |
2210824 | Walker, Sr. | Aug 1940 | A |
2380112 | Kinnear | Jul 1945 | A |
RE23416 | Kinnear | Oct 1951 | E |
2634955 | Johnson | Apr 1953 | A |
2651501 | McMahon | Sep 1953 | A |
2742439 | Hallett | Apr 1956 | A |
2901223 | Scott | Aug 1959 | A |
2915291 | Gulfelt | Dec 1959 | A |
3743037 | Bulakh et al. | Jul 1973 | A |
3923109 | Williams, Jr. | Dec 1975 | A |
3945447 | Peterson | Mar 1976 | A |
4006788 | Garner | Feb 1977 | A |
4127043 | Evans | Nov 1978 | A |
4136586 | Neilson et al. | Jan 1979 | A |
4145094 | Vezirian | Mar 1979 | A |
4158973 | Schumacher et al. | Jun 1979 | A |
4176724 | Vezirian | Dec 1979 | A |
4187743 | Thomas | Feb 1980 | A |
4204437 | Espana | May 1980 | A |
4209890 | Koskie | Jul 1980 | A |
4241798 | Jones | Dec 1980 | A |
4333364 | Varel | Jun 1982 | A |
4339009 | Busby | Jul 1982 | A |
4350060 | Vezirian | Sep 1982 | A |
4417629 | Wallace | Nov 1983 | A |
4446935 | Schumacher, Jr. | May 1984 | A |
4453836 | Klima | Jun 1984 | A |
4496013 | Serpa | Jan 1985 | A |
4549614 | Kaalstad et al. | Oct 1985 | A |
4610317 | England et al. | Sep 1986 | A |
4641976 | Kar | Feb 1987 | A |
4694551 | Mathews | Sep 1987 | A |
4751972 | Jones et al. | Jun 1988 | A |
4763736 | Varel | Aug 1988 | A |
4765205 | Higdon | Aug 1988 | A |
4796713 | Bechem et al. | Jan 1989 | A |
4819517 | Vezirian | Apr 1989 | A |
4832143 | Kaalstad et al. | May 1989 | A |
4874047 | Hixon | Oct 1989 | A |
4924954 | Mead | May 1990 | A |
4942930 | Millsapps | Jul 1990 | A |
4953641 | Pessier | Sep 1990 | A |
5027911 | Dysart | Jul 1991 | A |
5064007 | Kaalstad | Nov 1991 | A |
5147000 | Kaalstad | Sep 1992 | A |
5189932 | Palmo et al. | Mar 1993 | A |
5201795 | Howard et al. | Apr 1993 | A |
5341890 | Cawthorne | Aug 1994 | A |
5358061 | Van Nguyen | Oct 1994 | A |
5439068 | Huffstutler et al. | Aug 1995 | A |
5441120 | Dysart | Aug 1995 | A |
5452770 | Millsapps | Sep 1995 | A |
5505273 | Azar et al. | Apr 1996 | A |
5524510 | Davies et al. | Jun 1996 | A |
5586612 | Isbell et al. | Dec 1996 | A |
5592996 | Keith et al. | Jan 1997 | A |
5598895 | Anderson et al. | Feb 1997 | A |
5606895 | Huffstutler | Mar 1997 | A |
5636700 | Shamburger, Jr. | Jun 1997 | A |
5641029 | Beaton et al. | Jun 1997 | A |
5695018 | Pessier et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
5695019 | Shamburger, Jr. | Dec 1997 | A |
5839525 | Hoffmaster et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5887580 | Eyre | Mar 1999 | A |
5944125 | Byrd | Aug 1999 | A |
5975223 | Karlsson | Nov 1999 | A |
6033117 | Cariveau et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6068072 | Besson | May 2000 | A |
6099209 | Murray | Aug 2000 | A |
6253864 | Hall | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6254275 | Slaughter, Jr. et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6296067 | Slaughter, Jr. et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6321858 | Wentworth et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6345673 | Siracki | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6439326 | Huang et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6450271 | Tibbitts et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6516293 | Huang et al. | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6533050 | Molloy | Mar 2003 | B2 |
6543312 | Sullivan | Apr 2003 | B2 |
6561292 | Portwood | May 2003 | B1 |
6568490 | Tso et al. | May 2003 | B1 |
6763902 | Larsen et al. | Jul 2004 | B2 |
6779613 | Dykstra et al. | Aug 2004 | B2 |
6810971 | Sved | Nov 2004 | B1 |
6827159 | Sved | Dec 2004 | B2 |
6883624 | McDonough | Apr 2005 | B2 |
6904983 | Thigpen | Jun 2005 | B2 |
6935443 | Ehler et al. | Aug 2005 | B2 |
7195085 | Pia | Mar 2007 | B2 |
7341119 | Singh et al. | Mar 2008 | B2 |
7464773 | Rives | Dec 2008 | B2 |
7549490 | McDonough et al. | Jun 2009 | B2 |
8047307 | Pessier et al. | Nov 2011 | B2 |
8056651 | Turner et al. | Nov 2011 | B2 |
8141664 | Zahradnik et al. | Mar 2012 | B2 |
8672060 | Centala et al. | Mar 2014 | B2 |
8955413 | Bijai et al. | Feb 2015 | B2 |
20010054514 | Sullivan et al. | Dec 2001 | A1 |
20020000336 | Claesson et al. | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20020029909 | Griffo et al. | Mar 2002 | A1 |
20020084112 | Hall | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20060054361 | Boudrare et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20070062736 | Cariveau et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070131457 | McDonough et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070221417 | Hall et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20080011519 | Smith et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20090057030 | Didericksen et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090272582 | McCormick et al. | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20100163313 | Lin et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100224417 | Zahradnik et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100270085 | Turner et al. | Oct 2010 | A1 |
20110023663 | Bijai et al. | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110024197 | Centala et al. | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110162893 | Zhang | Jul 2011 | A1 |
20120031671 | Propes | Feb 2012 | A1 |
20120080230 | Flores et al. | Apr 2012 | A1 |
20140196956 | Centala et al. | Jul 2014 | A1 |
20140202773 | Zhang et al. | Jul 2014 | A1 |
20150090501 | King | Apr 2015 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
19521447 | Dec 1996 | DE |
2167107 | May 1986 | GB |
2203470 | Oct 1988 | GB |
2384503 | Jul 2003 | GB |
2008124572 | Oct 2008 | WO |
2011014590 | Apr 2011 | WO |
2011014591 | Apr 2011 | WO |
2011084944 | Oct 2011 | WO |
Entry |
---|
“The Disc Bit-A Tool for Hard-Rock Drilling”, J.C.R. Placido and J.E. Friant; Dec. 2004 SPE Drilling & Completion; pp. 205-211. |
Placido, et al. “The Disk Bit-A Tool for Hard-Rock Drilling”, Dec. 2004, SPE Drilling and Completion, SPE 79798, pp. 205-211. |
Office Action issued in related U.S. Appl. No. 12/844,589 on Jan. 4, 2013, 23 pages. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion issued in related PCT application PCT/US2010/043603 on Mar. 2, 2011, 8 pages. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion issued in related PCT application PCT/US2010/043604 dated Mar. 3, 2011, 6 pages. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion issued in related PCT application PCT/US2011/020091 on Jun. 23, 2011, 6 pages. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20070062736 A1 | Mar 2007 | US |