a. Field of Invention
The invention relates generally to vehicle structural design, and more particularly, to the structural design of a vehicle bumper system for improved impact deformation and resistance, particularly during bumper over-ride and under-ride conditions.
b. Description of Related Art
As is known in the art, automobile bumper systems are designed to absorb and distribute impact energy in a predetermined manner. While bumpers systems are generally designed to meet at equal vertical impact levels, in the event of bumper over-ride or under-ride (i.e. in the event of a car/truck collision), even a low speed impact can result in excessive vehicle damage. This is because typical bumper systems may include energy absorbers disposed at a height-wise central area of the bumper for providing impact resistance against a bumper presumably disposed at the same height, leaving the upper and lower ends of a bumper susceptible to over-ride or under-ride type collision which could result in vehicle damage.
U.S. Pat. No. 6,609,740 to Evans is exemplary of known bumper system designs. While the Evans design aims to consistently distribute the load of an impact, this design is nevertheless optimally suited for impact resistance against a bumper presumably disposed at the same height.
For example, Evans, as illustrated in
Thus, as discussed above, whereas Evans attempts to provide consistent load distribution, in the event of an over-ride or under-ride condition, the respective upper or lower area of the bumper would bear almost all of the impact load, thus inhibiting the intended bumper deformation as illustrated in
It is therefore desirable to provide a bumper system which provides a cost-effective means for minimizing bumper damage in the event of an over-ride or under-ride impact condition, and likewise providing consistent and predetermined bumper deformation. It is also desirable to provide a bumper system which is simple to design and manufacture, and which is readily adaptable to a variety of vehicle designs.
The invention solves the problems and overcomes the drawbacks and deficiencies of prior art bumper designs by providing an automobile bumper system including an isolator disposed adjacent a cross beam of an automobile frame, and a bumper edge guard strip mounted adjacent upper and/or lower edges of the cross beam. The bumper edge guard strip may include an upper extension fixedly engaged with an upper surface of the cross beam and a lower extension fixedly engaged with a frontal surface of the cross beam, with the upper extension having a length greater than the lower extension for distributing impact energy in a predetermined manner.
For the automobile bumper system described above, the bumper edge guard strip may be fixedly mounted, such as by a bolt, screw and the like, with the upper and frontal surfaces of the cross beam. The bumper edge guard strip may include one or more ribs connected to the upper and lower extensions for adding rigidity to the edge guard strip. Further, the bumper edge guard strip may include one or more ribs protruding from the upper extension for limiting deformation of the bumper edge guard strip. The isolator may be disposed between bumper edge guard strips mounted between the upper and lower edges of the cross beam.
The invention also provides an automobile bumper system including an isolator disposed adjacent a cross beam of an automobile frame and made of a material of a first density, and one or more ribs made of a material of a second density, higher than the first density, provided substantially (or partially) within the isolator for distributing impact energy in a predetermined manner.
For the automobile bumper system described above, the rib may be disposed generally along an upper surface of the isolator, and one or more further ribs may be disposed along a lower surface of the isolator. The ribs provided along the upper and lower surfaces of the isolator may be mirror image ribs, and in a particular embodiment, the ribs provided along the upper and lower surfaces of the isolator may include a trapezoidal cross-section. Alternatively, the rib may extend generally horizontally and is disposed generally centrally along a height of the isolator, and one or more further ribs may extend generally vertically along the height of the isolator. The bumper system may further include a frontal surface formed of the second density for distributing impact energy in a predetermined manner. In the aforementioned embodiments, the material may be a foam material. Yet further, in another embodiment, the rib may include a plastic or metal covering.
The invention yet further provides an automobile bumper system including an isolator disposed adjacent a cross beam of an automobile frame and made of a material of a first density, and a frontal surface made of a material of a second density, higher than the first density, substantially covering a front area of the isolator. The bumper system may further include an intermediate layer disposed between the isolator and frontal surface, with the intermediate layer made of a material of a third density, higher than the first and second densities, for distributing impact energy in a predetermined manner.
For the automobile bumper system described above, the isolator and frontal surface may be made of a foam material, and the intermediate layer may be made of a foam, plastic or metal.
The invention also provides an automobile bumper system including an isolator disposed adjacent a cross beam of an automobile frame. A bumper edge guard strip may be mounted adjacent an upper or lower edge of the cross beam. The bumper edge guard strip may include an upper extension fixedly engaged with frontal or upper surfaces of the cross beam and a lower extension fixedly engaged with the frontal or upper surfaces of the cross beam. The upper and/or lower extensions may provide a deformation height less than, equal to, or greater than a height of the cross beam for distributing impact energy in a predetermined manner.
For the automobile bumper system described above, the bumper edge guard strip may be fixedly mounted, such as by a bolt, screw and the like, with the upper and frontal surfaces of the cross beam. The bumper edge guard strip may include one or more ribs connected to the upper and lower extensions for adding rigidity to the edge guard strip. Further, the bumper edge guard strip may include one or more ribs protruding from the upper extension for limiting deformation of the bumper edge guard strip. The isolator may be disposed between bumper edge guard strips mounted between the upper and lower edges of the cross beam.
The invention yet further provides an automobile bumper system including a cross beam mounted adjacent an automobile frame. A bumper edge guard strip may be mounted adjacent an edge of the cross beam. The bumper edge guard strip may include a first extension fixedly engaged with frontal or side surfaces of the cross beam and a second extension fixedly engaged with the frontal or side surfaces of the cross beam. The first and/or second extensions may provide a deformation height less than, equal to, or greater than a height of the cross beam for distributing impact energy in a predetermined manner.
For the automobile bumper system described above, the bumper edge guard strip may be fixedly mounted with the frontal or side surfaces of the cross beam. The bumper edge guard strip may include one or more ribs connected to the first and second extensions for adding rigidity to the edge guard strip. The bumper edge guard strip may include one or more ribs protruding from the first extension, with the rib limiting deformation of the bumper edge guard strip. An isolator may be disposed between bumper edge guard strips mounted between the edges of the cross beam.
Additional features, advantages, and embodiments of the invention may be set forth or apparent from consideration of the following detailed description, drawings, and claims. Moreover, it is to be understood that both the foregoing summary of the invention and the following detailed description are exemplary and intended to provide further explanation without limiting the scope of the invention as claimed.
The accompanying drawings, which are included to provide a further understanding of the invention and are incorporated in and constitute a part of this specification, illustrate preferred embodiments of the invention and together with the detail description serve to explain the principles of the invention. In the drawings:
Referring now to the drawings wherein like reference numerals designate corresponding parts throughout the several views,
Referring to
During an over-ride type impact as illustrated in
Referring next to
Compared to bumper system 10 of
During an over-ride type impact as illustrated in
Referring next to
Compared to bumper system 10 of
During an over-ride type impact as illustrated in
Referring next to
Compared to bumper system 10 of
During an over-ride type impact as illustrated in
Referring next to
Compared to bumper system 10 of
During an over-ride type impact as illustrated in
Referring next to
Compared to bumper system 10 of
During an over-ride type impact as illustrated in
To thus summarize, the present invention provides a bumper system which provides a cost-effective means for minimizing bumper damage in the event of an over-ride or under-ride impact condition with the provision of the afore-described bumper edge guard strips 18, 146, ribs 54, 56, 84 and 86, and frontal surfaces 58, 124. As also described above, the provision of the noted elements provides consistent and predetermined bumper deformation, with the design being readily adaptable to a variety of vehicle designs.
Those skilled in the art would readily appreciate in view of this disclosure that various modifications could be made to the aforementioned components, without departing from the scope of the present invention. For example, whereas the embodiments of
Although particular embodiments of the invention have been described in detail herein with reference to the accompanying drawings, it is to be understood that the invention is not limited to those particular embodiments, and that various changes and modifications may be effected therein by one skilled in the art without departing from the scope or spirit of the invention as defined in the appended claims.
This application is a diviosional of U.S. application Ser. No. 11/761,747, filed Jun. 12, 2007, and issued May 19, 2009 as U.S. Pat. No. 7,533,912, hereby incorporated by reference in its entirety.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3666310 | Burgess | May 1972 | A |
3784182 | Sobel | Jan 1974 | A |
4061384 | Montgomery et al. | Dec 1977 | A |
4061385 | Schwartzberg | Dec 1977 | A |
4382042 | Hardy | May 1983 | A |
4635981 | Friton | Jan 1987 | A |
4652031 | Loren | Mar 1987 | A |
4722563 | Loren | Feb 1988 | A |
4762352 | Enomoto | Aug 1988 | A |
4826226 | Klie | May 1989 | A |
5265925 | Cox et al. | Nov 1993 | A |
5290078 | Bayer et al. | Mar 1994 | A |
5385375 | Morgan | Jan 1995 | A |
5803517 | Shibuya | Sep 1998 | A |
5810406 | Reid, Jr. | Sep 1998 | A |
5875875 | Knotts | Mar 1999 | A |
6354641 | Schroeder | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6511109 | Schultz et al. | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6547295 | Vismara | Apr 2003 | B2 |
6575510 | Weissenborn | Jun 2003 | B2 |
6609740 | Evans | Aug 2003 | B2 |
6659520 | Bastien et al. | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6672635 | Weissenborn et al. | Jan 2004 | B2 |
6695366 | Cherry | Feb 2004 | B2 |
6726262 | Marijnissen et al. | Apr 2004 | B2 |
6746061 | Evans | Jun 2004 | B1 |
6755452 | Cate et al. | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6758507 | Tarahomi et al. | Jul 2004 | B2 |
6793256 | Carley | Sep 2004 | B2 |
6817638 | Choi et al. | Nov 2004 | B1 |
6874832 | Evans et al. | Apr 2005 | B2 |
6877785 | Evans et al. | Apr 2005 | B2 |
6962379 | Minami | Nov 2005 | B2 |
6983964 | Murata | Jan 2006 | B2 |
6997490 | Evans | Feb 2006 | B2 |
7044514 | Mustafa et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
7052056 | Weissenborn | May 2006 | B2 |
7059642 | Ohno | Jun 2006 | B2 |
7131674 | Evans et al. | Nov 2006 | B2 |
7163242 | Shuler et al. | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7172227 | Weissenborn | Feb 2007 | B2 |
7188876 | Jaarda | Mar 2007 | B2 |
7222897 | Evans | May 2007 | B2 |
7226097 | Adachi et al. | Jun 2007 | B2 |
7340833 | Weissenborn | Mar 2008 | B2 |
7370893 | Tamada | May 2008 | B2 |
20010026073 | Sato | Oct 2001 | A1 |
20030020290 | Cherry | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20040094975 | Shuler et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
20060055187 | Jaarda et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2003220909 | Aug 2003 | JP |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20090039662 A1 | Feb 2009 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 11761747 | Jun 2007 | US |
Child | 12177445 | US |