The present invention generally relates to firefighting equipment, and more specifically, to a hybrid foam proportioning system for fighting fires.
The addition of foaming agents to fire fighting fluids or water streams is well known and can be particularly useful for fighting fires, for example, fires in industrial factories, chemical plants, petrochemical plants, petroleum refineries, forests, and structures. The use of fire fighting foam requires that a foam concentrate be mixed and added at constant proportions to the water stream. When the foam solution is delivered, the foam solution effectively extinguishes the flames of chemical, petroleum, and ordinary combustible fires which would otherwise not be effectively extinguished by the application of water alone.
Foam supply systems known in the art include CAFS (Compressed Air Foam System), WEPS (Water Expansion Pumping System), and EFPS (Electronic Foam Proportioning Systems). A typical foam proportioning system includes a foam injector system and a water pumping system. Whereas a typical CAFS includes a foam injector, a water pumping system, and an air system including an air compressor for supplying air under pressure. For example, when employing mixture ratios of 1/2 to 1 cubic feet per minute (“CFM”) of air to 1 gallon per minute (“GPM”) of water, these systems can produce very desirable results in fire fighting by the use of “Class A” or “Class B” foams to help achieve fire suppression and to deal with increased fire loads and related hazards.
Class A foams are also typically proportioned at 0.1% to 1.0% with an average of 0.4% to 0.5% foam chemical and most often used at flows below 1000 GPM (typically 150-250 GPM). However, Class B foams are proportioned at much higher rates of about 1% to 6% foam chemical typically at about 250 GPM per discharge line for larger hazards. Therefore, for a high flow Class B foam, a much higher foam proportioning capacity is required. However, typical electrical systems on fire apparatus, such as a fire engine, can only support up to a 6 GPM electric pump system. While such systems are suitable for Class A foams, which typically require up to 1.25 GPM of Class A foam concentrate to treat up to 250 GPM of water, such systems are not suited for Class B applications which require about 7.5 GPM or more of foam concentrate to treat about 250 GPM water for a 3% foam chemical. This is where the venturi based, high flow hybrid foam system of the present embodiment advantageously provides the necessary high flow Class B firefighting foam. Class A and Class B relate to fire classes A and B. Class A fires typically involve burning wood whereas Class B fires involve liquid combustible fuels.
Conventional foam proportioning systems typically utilize venturi based proportioning technology. Venturi devices are known proportioning devices creating pressure drops that vary with fluid flow rate in order to proportion foam concentrate into a fire fighting fluid conduit in accordance with varying fire fighting fluid flow rates. Conventional venturi devices accomplish this task with a certain degree of accuracy and efficiency at a fixed flow. In general, the greater the fire fighting fluid flow rate the greater the pressure drop through the venturi, thus drawing in a greater amount of foam concentrate. However, such venturi devices alone are not accurate at low flow rates and their efficiency decreases with high flow rates. The efficiency drops because total pressure drop is in proportion to flow rate and pressure recovery downstream is limited to a maximum efficiency range in the order of 65% to 85% of the pressure drop. Thus, the higher the flow rate, the greater the pressure drop, the less the pressure recovery and the more limited the efficiency. Moreover, conventional venturi devices are not controllable by a user so that such inefficiencies and under or over proportioned foam solutions result due to out-of-control operating conditions of the venturi. Additionally, in a conventional system, the operator has no feedback for adjustment of flow or backpressure which are critical operational parameters for venturi (also know as an eductor) operation. Too much back pressure, for instance will lower or stop foam flow.
The cost of most high volume foam proportioning systems render such systems cost prohibitive for average local fire departments, especially considering that most fires handled by local fire departments are Class A or very small Class B fires, which do not require the assistance of high volume foam proportioning systems. Although smaller foam proportioning systems do exist, such as discharge side pump proportioning systems, such smaller systems do not have the capacity for large Class B fires. As a result, when large Class B fires do arise, under equipped fire departments usually require assistance from other fire departments that may have specialty foam, air port, military, or industrial foam units, or the larger fire burns uncontrolled until enough fuel is consumed that the fire is small enough to be extinguished by the smaller equipment the fire department has in service, obviously creating additional damage and risk. Accordingly, there is a need for a simple, easy to use, controllable foam system that can be readily used for low volume Class A fires and easily converted to a reliable high volume Class B foam flow for Class B fires.
The present invention provides for a hybrid foam system comprising: a low flow foam proportioning system; a high flow foam proportioning system operatively associated with the low flow foam proportioning system; a water source connected to the low flow and high flow foam proportioning systems; and a system controller operatively in communication with the low flow and high flow foam proportioning systems.
The present invention also provides for a method of producing a variety of foam solutions comprising the steps of: providing a low flow foam proportioning system; providing a high flow foam proportioning system operatively associated with the low flow foam proportioning system; and providing a system controller operatively associated with the low flow and high flow foam proportioning systems for controlling the operation of the low flow and high flow foam proportioning systems.
The foregoing summary, as well as the following detailed description of the preferred embodiments of the invention, will be better understood when read in conjunction with the appended drawings. For the purpose of illustrating the invention, there are shown in the drawings embodiments of the invention which are presently preferred. It should be understood, however, that the invention is not limited to the precise arrangements and instrumentalities shown.
In the drawings:
Certain terminology is used in the following description for convenience only and is not limiting. The words “right,” “left,” “lower,” and “upper” designate directions in the drawings to which reference is made. The words “inwardly” and “outwardly” refer to directions toward and away from, respectively, the geometric center of the foam systems and designated parts thereof. The terminology includes the words above specifically mentioned, derivatives thereof and words of similar import. Additionally, the word “a,” as used in the claims and in the corresponding portions of the specification, means “at least one.”
In an embodiment as shown in
The low flow foam proportioning system 100 can be any conventional foam proportioning system such as a FoamLogix® Electronic Foam Proportioning System from Hale Products Inc, of Conshohocken, Pa., a compressed air foam system, or similar electronic discharge side foam proportioning system that does not, by itself, have the capacity for large Class B foam flow. The low flow foam proportioning system 100, as shown in
The foam pump 104 operates to pump either Class A or Class B foam (depending on the setting of the selector valve 102) from the respective tanks 300, 302 to the first conduit 105. The first conduit 105 provides a fluid path between the water source 304, the foam pump 104, and the discharge unit 308. The foam pump 104 can also include a foam pump flow meter (not shown) to provide real time feedback to the system controller 310 on the rate of foam flow to the first conduit 105. A typical foam pump 104 is capable of pumping about 5.0 gallons per minute (GPM).
Operation of the selector valve 102 is used to determine whether Class A or Class B foam is pumped at any given time. The selector valve 102 and foam pump 104 are both operatively connected to the system controller 310 that can automatically control the type and rate of foam being pumped in response to an input, such as an operator input, to advantageously provide a more accurate percentage foam solution.
The low flow foam proportioning system 100 can optionally include a check valve 112 and a water flow sensor 114 operatively in communication with the system controller 310. Overall, the system controller 310 is preferably configured to be operatively in communication with the selector valve 102, the foam pump 104, and the water flow sensor 114. To control the overall concentration of the foam solution discharge, the system controller 310 is used to control the foam pump 104 which regulates the amount of foam concentrate from the foam tanks to the first conduit 105.
In another embodiment, the low flow foam proportioning system 100 can be a conventional compressed air foam system 100′ as shown in
Various foam chemicals 16 can be used with the low flow foam proportioning system 100 or the high flow foam proportioning system 200 to generate the foam solution 12. For firefighting purposes, the foam chemical 16 generally refers to firefighting foam chemical additives of the Class A or B variety. These firefighting foam chemicals are generally known in the art and used in the firefighting service and a detailed description of such foam chemicals is not necessary for a complete understanding of the present invention. While foam chemicals are presently preferred, it is to be understood that any chemical additive capable of facilitating fire suppression to be within the scope of the present embodiment.
Referring to
The power source 28 is operatively coupled to an air compressor 30 and provides sufficient power and speed to run the air compressor 30. The air compressor 30 typically runs at a constant speed in the compressed air foam system 100′. The air compressor 30 can be a rotary compressor, a reciprocating type compressor, or any other compressor readily known in the art.
The air compressor 30 is fitted with an intake throttling valve 32 which allows control of the air discharge pressure from the air compressor 30 by throttling the air intake of the compressor 30 at an air inlet 34. Suitable air intake throttling valves 32 are available from AirCon, Erie, Pa. Decreasing the air flow into the air compressor 30 reduces the airflow out of the air compressor 30. This allows the outlet air pressure to be controlled across any compressor discharge orifice. The air intake valve 32 can be pilot operated and controlled by a pilot regulator, such as those available from AirCon, Erie Pa., in a fashion common to industrial compressors.
Water 14 from a water source enters the compressed air foam system 100′ at a water inlet 36 and passes through a water flow path 38 through the compressed air foam system 100′. A portion of the water flow in the compressed air foam system 100′ can be bled off and fed to a heat exchanger 40, such as a water to oil heat exchanger, to cool the air compressor 30. The water 14 leaving the heat exchanger 40 can be fed to any desired location, such as back to a water tank on the fire truck, for example. The water 14 provided to the heat exchanger 40 does not contain the foam chemical 16.
The water 14 flows from the water inlet 36 through a check valve 42 to prevent any foam chemical 16 from back flowing into the water source 14 or the heat exchanger 40. The water 14 next enters a water and foam chemical mixer 44 to mix together the water 14 and foam chemical 16. The foam chemical 16 may be fed into the water and foam chemical mixer 44 by a pump 46. In the water and foam chemical mixer 44, the foam chemical 16 is added in the correct proportion to the water flow. Typically Class A foam chemical is added at about 0.1 to 1.0 percent by volume foam chemical.
The foam solution (i.e., foam chemical and water solution) is then passed through a tee 48 to provide plain foam solution 50 to specified firefighting discharges, if desired. The remaining foam solution 50 passes through another check valve 52 to prevent backflow of compressed air foam solution 12 into the foam solution lines. A ball valve 54 controls the rate but does not shut off the foam solution flow. After the ball valve 54 the air is injected from an air outlet of the air compressor 30 through an air discharge check valve 56. The foam solution can then be turned into the compressed air foam solution 12 using for example, motionless mixers 58, such as those described in U.S. Pat. No. 5,427,181 to Laskaris et al., the disclosure of which is hereby incorporated by reference. The finished compressed air foam solution 12 is routed to one or more hose lines 60 with shut off valves 62 (such as a nozzle) for controlling the application of the compressed air foam on the fire.
The compressed air foam system 100′ can utilize a control system (not shown) which may be constructed of mechanical relays, electronic circuits, a computer, combinations thereof or any other control system readily known in the art.
If a water flow signal indicates that no water is flowing from the water source 14, the control system can completely close the air intake valve 32 on the compressor 30 which will stop the flow of air. Water cannot flow from the mixer 58 back into the compressor 30 because the air discharge check valve 56 shuts as soon as the air flow from the compressor 30 stops. Reducing the discharge pressure of the air compressor 30 places less load on the engine used to run the compressor 30, such as a small air cooled engine, when no air flow is required.
Additional sensors (not shown) can also be included in the control system to control the air flow into and out of the compressor 30. The sensors detect a particular parameter and have a parameter signal indicative of the parameter. The control system utilizes the parameter signals to actuate the air flow controller 32 based on the parameter signals.
Referring to
In another embodiment, the low flow foam proportioning system 100 can be a conventional electronic foam proportioning system (not shown). Exemplary foam proportioning systems are described in U.S. Pat. No. 5,996,700, entitled Foam Proportioner System, which is hereby incorporated by reference in its entirety.
Referring back to
In a preferred embodiment as shown in
Referring back to
As shown in greater detail in
The liquid inlet 230 is configured to receive the flow of a liquid upstream from the converging section 224, for example, for receiving the flow of liquid from the low flow foam proportioning system 100 or a water source 304 such as a fire truck 20 or a water hydrant 22. The foam inlet 232 is configured for receiving a flow of a foam chemical or foam concentrate from, for example, a foam tank 302. The outlet 234 is configured for the exit of the liquid and foam flow i.e., foam solution downstream from the diverging section 226. The outlet 234 can then be connected to a discharge unit 308 such as a fire hose with shut off valves for use on fires.
The venturi based foam proportioner 204 is preferably configured with first 238 and second 240 pressure sensors. The first pressure sensor 238 is disposed upstream of the converging section 224 for sensing upstream pressure. The second pressure sensor 240 is disposed downstream of the diverging section 226 for sensing downstream pressure. The pressure sensors can be any conventional pressure sensors such as a Wheatstone bridge strain gauge pressure sensor or a variable capacitance pressure transducer such as those manufactured by GEMS. Alternatively, any conventional flow meter or flow sensor can be used instead of or in combination with the pressure sensors 238, 240. Each pressure sensor can be independently in communication with the system controller 310.
In a preferred embodiment, the venturi based foam proportioner 204 is configured to allow a flow of about 250 GPM of fire fighting fluid. The foam concentrate is proportioned with the fire fighting fluid at a rate of about 0.1% to about 6% by volume foam concentrate and more preferably at a rate of about 2.5% to about 3.5% by volume foam concentrate. The venturi based foam proportioner 204 can also be configured to proportion about 15 GPM of foam with the fire fighting fluid.
The piston 236 in combination with the venturi 205 allows for higher velocities at lower flow rates by occluding the area of the vena contracta 228 in the venturi 205. The overall result is a variable area venturi that can create increased local velocities which in turn can increase the negative pressure and thus increase the amount of foam concentrate injected at low inlet flow rates. This advantageously allows for the production of Class B foam from low volume flow pumping systems.
The piston 236 is configured to move axially along the diverging section 226 of the venturi 205 toward or away from the vena contracta 228 and its position can be controlled by the system controller 310. Such pistons are readily known in the art and a detailed description of them is not necessary for a complete understanding of this embodiment. Alternatively the piston 236 can be configured to be balanced against its own drag force through the use of a spring (such as shown in
Referring back to
The system controller 310 is configured to be operatively in communication with the low flow foam proportioning system 100 and the high flow foam proportioning system 200 for controlling the overall operation of the hybrid foam system 10. Preferably, the system controller 310 is configured to be operatively in communication with the bypass valve 208, inlet flow sensor 210, inlet pressure sensor 212, outlet pressure sensor 214, foam inlet valve 216, foam inlet pressure sensor 218, and the first and second pressure sensors 238 and 240 of the venturi-based foam proportioner 204.
In another embodiment, the low flow 100 and high flow 200 foam proportioning systems are configured as a modular hybrid foam system 10′ as shown in
Referring back to
In a preferred embodiment, the system controller 310 controls the foam solution percentage discharged from the low flow foam proportioning system 100 by controlling the foam pump 104 which controls the rate of foam concentrate flow to the first conduit 105. Moreover, the system controller 310 can automatically adjust the rate of foam concentrate flow in response to feed back from a foam pump flow meter (not shown). The system controller 310 controls the foam solution percentage discharged from the high flow foam proportioning system 200 by controlling the rate of flow of water into the venturi 204 by controlling the control valve 202. The rate of flow of water passing through the venturi 204 directly controls the amount of foam concentrate entering the venturi 204 and mixing with the water flow to form the foam solution. Moreover, the system controller 310 can automatically adjust the rate of foam concentrate flow in response to feed back from the foam inlet pressure sensor 218. This is accomplished by the system controller 310 automatically adjusting the control valve 202 or the foam inlet valve 216.
The hybrid foam system 10 advantageously provides operational feedback, such as inlet and outlet pressures and flow rates, to an operator or a system controller such that modifications can be made semi-automatically or automatically to operate the hybrid foam system 10 within its optimal parameters. Thus, the quality of foam solution available to fire fighters will not be compromised due to foam proportioning systems operating out of specification.
The discharge unit 308 can be any discharge unit such as fire hoses, nozzles, or the like or a series of such fire hoses. For the hybrid foam system 10 in a parallel configuration (as shown in
Referring back to
Referring back to
As shown in
From the foregoing, it can be seen that the present invention provides for an apparatus for a hybrid foam system and methods thereof. It will be appreciated by those skilled in the art that changes could be made to the embodiments described above without departing from the broad inventive concept thereof. It is understood, therefore, that this invention is not limited to the particular embodiments disclosed, but is intended to cover modifications within the spirit and scope of the present invention as defined by the appended claims.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3322350 | Heinicke et al. | May 1967 | A |
5284174 | Norman | Feb 1994 | A |
5427181 | Laskaris et al. | Jun 1995 | A |
5494112 | Arvidson et al. | Feb 1996 | A |
5960887 | Crabtree | Oct 1999 | A |
5996700 | Sulmone | Dec 1999 | A |
6138767 | La Vergne | Oct 2000 | A |
6357532 | Laskaris et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6725940 | Klein et al. | Apr 2004 | B1 |
6991041 | Laskaris et al. | Jan 2006 | B2 |
20060113405 | Hubmann et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
3817852 | Jul 1989 | DE |
0978296 | Feb 2000 | EP |
2004010086 | Jan 2004 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20090218110 A1 | Sep 2009 | US |