The present invention relates to imaging sensors and in particular to infrared imaging sensors with special features for substantially reducing or eliminating dark current noise and clock noise.
Active pixel CMOS sensors are well known. CMOS is an abbreviation for complementary metal oxide semiconductor. An active-pixel sensor (APS) is an image sensor consisting of an integrated circuit containing an array of pixel sensors (each pixel containing a photo-detector and pixel circuitry containing an active amplifier) and reset and readout circuitry. CMOS sensors are produced by a CMOS process and have emerged as an inexpensive alternative to charge-coupled device (CCD) imagers. CMOS APS's consume far less power than CCD's, have less image lag, and can be fabricated on much cheaper and more available manufacturing lines. Unlike CCD's, CMOS APS's can combine both the image sensor function and image processing functions within the same integrated circuit.
CMOS APS's have become the technology of choice for many consumer applications, most significantly the burgeoning cell phone camera market; however, adoption of these APS image sensors has also found inroads in many other growing fields of photography and imaging. These include digital radiography, military ultra high speed image acquisition, high resolution ‘smart’ security cameras as well as many other consumer applications.
A standard CMOS APS pixel consisting of three transistors as well as a photo-detector is shown in
A typical two-dimensional array of pixels is organized into rows and columns. Pixels in a given row share reset lines, so that a whole row is reset at a time. The row select lines of each pixel in a row are tied together as well. The outputs of each pixel in any given column are tied together. Since only one row is selected at a given time, no competition for the output line occurs. Further signal conditioning circuitry is typically accomplished on a column basis.
Operation of transistors with constant gate bias is a known technique used to maintain the source voltage of a transistor at a constant value. For example, for n-type transistors operated with 3.3 supply voltage, a gate voltage at about 0.7 volts (the threshold voltage of the transistor) above the desired source voltage will permit current to flow from the drain of the transistor to the source. The current depends upon the voltage drop between drain and source. If the gate voltage is less than 0.7 volts above the source voltage, the transistor is considered “off” and only “off leakage current” can flow through the channel. In modern semiconductor process, the “off leakage current” is negligible. (When the n-type transistor is used as a “digital switch”, the gate voltage is typically set at ground (0 volt) to turn “off” the transistor and the gate voltage is set at the supply voltage to turn the transistor “on”.)
For example in the case of the above n-type transistor having a 0.7 volt threshold operated with a constant gate voltage such as 3.3 volt and with its source connected to one side of a capacitor whose other side is connected to ground and its drain is connected to a supply voltage at 3.3 volts, the current will flow through the channel of the transistor charging the capacitor until the voltage at the source is about 0.7 volt below the gate voltage. That is, 3.3 V minus 0.7 V equals 2.6 V for a constant gate potential. (The 0.7 V in this example is referred to as the transistor threshold and typical values, in modern semiconductor process, of the threshold are about 0.5-0.7 volts for the transistors to be operated with 3.3 V supply voltage.) This will keep the source voltage approximately constant at a voltage of about 0.7 volt below the gate voltage (i.e. 2.6 volts) while allowing current to flow through the transistor to the capacitor.
A problem associated with CMOS APS's is that they tend to be susceptible to noise problems. Major problems are reset clock noise and dark current noise. Noise problems typically increase for optical sensors designed to detect longer wavelength, lower energy light.
In a typical CMOS sensor, each pixel's sensing node is typically reset many times per second (such as 30 times per seconds) to establish a reference (or reset) condition before each readout. A typical implementation of this reset function is to use a transistor as a “switch” whose gate is electrically connected to a control clock signal from a timing circuit on-chip or off-chip. This control clock signal typically is alternately “on” and “off” on a frame-by-frame basis or row-by-row basis. From the timing generation circuit of this reset clock signal to the channel of the reset transistor inside the pixel, there is impedance (including resistance and capacitance) along the path that is not always constant but may vary with time. It is well known that such impedance has noise associated with it. It is typically a major design task to reduce or eliminate such noise associated with the pixel reset. This type of noise is called “clock noise”.
In most CMOS and CCD, photodiodes are comprised of silicon doped with impurities to produce n and p regions, and sometimes there might be an un-doped intrinsic region separating the n and p regions. It is known that photodiodes can be produced with materials other than silicon. These materials include Germanium, Indium Gallium Arsenide, Indium Antimonide and Indium Arsenide. The photodiodes made of Germanium, Indium Gallium Arsenide, Indium Antimonide or Indium Arsenide can be made to detect photons in the spectral range from near infrared, short wave infrared, mid-wave infrared and long-wave infrared. However, a critical weakness of these photodiodes is that they are typically much more subject to dark current. As a result of it, the conventional pixel circuits can not be used in conjunction with such photodiodes for imaging sensor array applications.
Dark current is the relatively small electric current that flows through a photosensitive device such as a photodiode, or charge-coupled device even when no photons are entering the device. Dark current tends to increase with increases in the voltage potential applied across the photodiode. Photodiodes made of material such as crystalline and hydrogenated amorphous silicon exhibit very low dark current. However, photodiodes made of germanium on silicon substrate show very large dark current. Photodiodes formed in bulk crystalline germanium have somewhat lower but still very high dark leakage for image sensor applications. A germanium-based photo-detector concept has been proposed in U.S. Pat. No. 7,288,825. This technique proposes a three terminal p-n-p photo-detector where one of the p-n junctions is used to collect unwanted leakage current leaving the other p-n junction to function as a photodiode with low dark current leakage. This patent is incorporated by reference herein.
Pinned photodiodes sensors are well known in the prior art. Following are examples of patents describing CMOS sensors employing pinned photodiodes: U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,625,210; 5,880,495; 5,904,493; 6,297,070; 6,566,697; 6,967,120; and 7,115,855. All of these patents are incorporated herein by reference.
A known technique to eliminate clock noise is based on the fact that once the reset switch has been turned “off”, the clock noise will not significantly change the condition at the sense node. This allows one to completely remove clock noise at the sensing node by the “correlated double sampling” (CDS) technique. CDS eliminates clock noise by determining the difference between a sample taken at the sense node after the reset as the reference level and a second sample after the signal charges have been transferred to the sense node. There is no reset to the sense node between these two samplings. As a result of it, CDS can eliminate reset noise to the sense node very effectively because the noise caused by reset clock does not occur between the reference sampling and the signal sampling.
In the simplest CMOS active pixel sensor designs, there are rows and columns of pixels with each pixel containing a photodiode region and three transistors. In this design, the charge collection node, charge integration node and charge sensing node is the same node physically or electrically connected with negligible impedance. Two of the transistors are “passive in nature, one of the “passive” transistors is used to reset the charge sensing/integration/collection node (the SIC node) and one is used to address each individual row of pixels. The third transistor is an active element functioning as a source-follower to provide a pixel output voltage based upon a charge signal at the SIC node produced in the photodiode region. In this three-transistor pixel circuit, reset and signal readouts occur in the following sequence: (1) reset the SIC node, (2) integrate charges for a period of time (exposure time), (3) select the row, (4) readout the pixel signal after illumination for every pixel within the selected row and (5) reset the SIC node of the selected row immediately and readout for the second time to establish a reference voltage level. The net pixel signal is defined by the differential between Steps 4 and 5. (6) Repeat steps 1-5 continuously. The difference between these signals can be determined using analog techniques before the signals are digitized or digitally after digitization. The purpose of Step 1 is to reset the SIC node to be free of carriers to establish a reference level before charge integration starts. The purpose of Step 5 is to reset the SIC node in order to establish a reference voltage level. The proper readout sequence ought to be “reset the SIC node” first before any readout of real signal voltage level. In this simplest three-transistor design, the charge integration node and charge sensing node circuit-wise is the same node. Therefore one can not perform Step 5 ahead of Step 4; if so, the charges integrated at the SIC node would be lost. As a result, one has no choice but to readout the signal voltage level first as done in Step 4 then reset and measure the reference voltage level in a Step 5. As a result uncertainty results from the noise associated with the reset to the SIC node occurring in between the two readout steps. Thus, the signal and reference voltages are not correlated so this readout scheme is called un-correlated double sampling.
To achieve low noise sensing, it is desirable to make the readout totally correlated under which uncertainty due to the reset clock noise onto the charge sensing node can be cancelled completed. In order to do this, the first design goal is to isolate the charge integration node from the charge sensing node. This can be accomplished with a fourth transistor functioning as a switch to isolate the charge integration node from the charge sensing node. With such a design, one can then operate the pixel with the following sequence: (1) reset the charge integration node, (2) integrate charges for a certain period of time (exposure time), (3) reset the charge sense node, (4) select the row, (5) readout the signal at the charge sense node, (6) transfer the charge from the charge integration node to the charge sense node, and (7) readout the signal at the charge sense node the second time. This sequence is then repeated for other rows. Since there is no reset to the charge sense node between Steps (5) and (7); therefore, the signal detected at Step (7) is correlated to the “start condition” at Step (5). As a result of it, any uncertainty to the charge sensing node caused by the reset control signal on the reset transistor is avoided. Since the sense node is read twice in a correlated manner, once immediately after reset and once after the charges are transferred from the charge integration node, with no reset in between, this readout scheme is called correlated double sampling. The purpose of correlated double sampling is to eliminate the clock noise of the reset transistor MRST into the charge sensing node. In this four transistor pixel design, the charge integration node is reset only once in Step 1 before charge integration starts. This is typically done by closing (turning “ON”) the fourth transistor separating the charge integration node from the charge sensing node and resetting both nodes prior to the charge integration step. Typically, this reset is done on a row-by-row basis, which is called rolling shutter. If one uses a mechanical shutter with this kind of sensors, one can reset the charge integration nodes of all the pixels at the same time on a frame basis. After the integration time, one can then close the mechanical shutter and readout the signal one row of a time.
At the beginning of the operation, both the reset transistor and the transfer gate transistor are turned ON and the photodiode 400 DPH at reset is reset to a known voltage reverse biasing photodiode 400 Dph and establishing a reset potential at node 402 and at node 403. After reset, both the reset transistor and the transfer gate transistor will be tuned OFF and photo-generated and thermally-generated electrons start accumulating in the depletion regions of the p-n junction of the photodiode 400 DPH reducing the electric potential at node 402. This period of charge accumulation is referred to as a charge integration time. (The p-n junction thus is serving the function of a capacitor. In
In this arrangement as shown in
Bump bonding is a sensor technology relying on a hybrid approach. With this approach, the readout chip and the photo-detector portions are developed separately, and the sensor is constructed by flip-chip mating (also called bump bonding) of the two. This method offers maximum flexibility in the development process, choice of fabrication technologies, and the choice of sensor materials. However, it is very difficult and expensive to use this flip-chip process to make image sensors of multi-million pixels. And in today's state-of-the-art bump bonding technique, the bumps mating the readout chip and photo-detector are larger than 20 um; therefore, it is very difficult to scale up to multi-million pixel image sensors using this technique.
What is needed is a monolithic image sensor responsive to low energy light with special MOS or CMOS pixel circuitry for minimizing dark leakage current, and has similar flexibility as the traditional hybrid image sensors but with much better capability to scale up to multi-million pixel image sensors.
The present invention provides a hybrid MOS or CMOS based image sensor. The sensor includes photon-sensing elements comprised of an array of photo-sensing elements deposited in the form of separate islands on or in a substrate. Pixel circuitry is created on and/or in the silicon substrate at or near the edge of or beneath the photon-sensing elements. The photo-sensing elements may be formed with a stack of photo-sensing semiconductor layers or created in a single photon-sensing semiconductor layer. Special circuitry is provided to keep the potential across the pixel photon-sensing element at or near zero volts to minimize or eliminate dark current. The potential difference is preferably less than 1.0 volt. The circuitry also keeps the small potential difference across the photodiodes constant or approximately constant throughout the charge integration cycle. In preferred embodiments the substrate is a crystalline substrate and the photon-sensing elements are separated by a dielectric layer from the substrate except for a small hole through which the material of the photon-sensing element can be grown epitaxially. Photodiodes are used in the preferred embodiments as the photo-sensing elements.
Preferred embodiments are adapted for correlated double sampling to substantially reduce or eliminate clock noise. Preferred embodiments include pixel circuitry defining a charge collection node on which charges generated inside a photodiode region are collected, a charge integration node, at which charges generated in said pixel are integrated to produce pixel signals, a charge sensing node from which reset signals and the pixel signals are sensed. The charge collection node and charge integration node are physically separated from each other. However, the charge integration node and charge sensing node can be electrically shorted to be considered as a common node or separated by other circuit elements as two separated nodes. In this separation Applicant preferably uses a constant gate bias transistor whose gate is held at a substantially constant bias voltage, about 1.2 V, during the charge integration cycle. Applicant makes this bias voltage programmable in the range of 0.7V to 2.1V to fine tune the overall sensor performance. This transistor maintains the voltage at the charge collection node at a constant value, at least during the charge integration cycle. The charge collection node is considered electrically short to the one of the electrode connecting to the photodiode. This constant voltage eliminates the need to use the built-in capacitance of the photodiode to store signal charges. The capacitance associated with the integration node is reset to produce a potential at the integration node of about 2.6 volts at the beginning of the charge integration cycle in the preferred embodiment. The constant gate bias transistor allows current flowing from the charge integration node to the charge collection node until the charge collection node is charged up to slightly (a few tenths of a volt) below the constant gate bias. After reset, the charge integration node is left “floating”.
During charge integration cycle, electron-hole pairs will be generated with electrons migrating to the charge collection node through one end of the photodiode and holes migrating to the other end of the photodiode. Because of the accumulation of the additional electrons at the charge collection node, its voltage potential will drop. This will in effect “turn on” the constant gate biased transistor and let current flow from the charge integration node (electrically short to the drain of the constant gate biased transistor) until the voltage at the charge collection node (electrically short to the source of the constant biased transistor) goes back up to slightly (a few tenths of a volt) below the gate bias and then the current flow will stop. The current flow to maintain the charge collection node at a constant voltage continues to lower the voltage at the charge integration node throughout the charge integration period. The amount of the voltage drop at the charge integration node is proportional to the amount of charges generated inside the photodiode.
This novel design resolves the concern of incomplete charge transfer on the charges stored on the photodiode (and its associated circuitry) since there is no charge transfer from the photodiode region during the signal readout cycles. Charge transfer from photodiode regions during readout can be a serious problem where the charges stored on the photodiode needs to travel through vias and interlayer metal connectors in order to get to the charge sensing node. This travel path can not be fabricated with perfection in real practice; therefore, incomplete charge transfer is expected. Using a constant gate bias transistor to maintain the charge collection node at a constant value, eliminates the need of relying on the effective capacitance of the photodiode and fringe capacitance along the conducting path from the photodiode to the charge collection node as a part of a charge integration capacitance. Therefore, since signal charges are not stored at, and readout from, the charge collection node; any imperfection of the path will not affect the integrity of the signal. Use of the constant gate bias is also important where the photodiode material is naturally subject to dark current leakage.
It is as important to provide substantially complete charge transfer from the charge integration node to the charge sensing node. To do this, Applicant in preferred embodiments heavily dopes the surface of the storage n-p junction diode to fill the surface regions with acceptors to avoid or minimize the trapping and re-emission of electrons by the surface defects. In some preferred embodiments of the present invention five transistors per pixel are used to provide CDS capability.
The Applicants' present invention can be adapted to work as an “electronic shutter”.
Preferred embodiments of the present invention may be described by reference to the drawings.
The silicon substrate material used in the methods described below is typical silicon substrate material used in semiconductor industry; could be either a p-type silicon substrate alone or a p-type epitaxial layer of about 4-6 micron thick on top of a p-type substrate. In the disclosure of this invention, the author makes no differentiation between these two types of substrates and refers them as “substrate”.
As indicated above, the first preferred method uses a silicon substrate and the preferred material for the photodiode islands is a stack of epitaxially grown germanium layers.
As shown in
As shown in
An oxidation process is used to make a roughly 6,000A oxide layer on the entire wafer, as shown in
Holes 104 of about 2,500 A are opened near the center of the cavity through the oxide layer. The location of the little holes is not critical as long as the hole penetrates clear through the oxide layer to the substrate to permit the substrate to provide a seed source of crystallinity for epitaxial layers that will be grown in the cavity. See
In sequence epitaxially grow a p-type germanium (Ge) layer 106, an intrinsic germanium layer 108 and n-type germanium layer 110 as shown in
Chemical mechanical polish (CMP) is applied to remove the excessive Ge in the cavity regions and the oxide layer from the silicon regions to create an array of Ge island regions as shown in
The wafers out of Step 5 are processed as a regular silicon wafer to make pixel circuits (PIC) 112 in the silicon regions, as shown in
In this implementation, the p-layer of the p-i-n photodiode is electrically connected to an external bias voltage through the p-type silicon substrate; which would create a vertical p-i-n photodiode structure. The photodiode would be reverse-biased if a bias voltage applied to the n-layer is higher than the bias voltage to the p-layer. As explained in U.S. Pat. No. 7,012,314, which has been incorporated herein by reference, germanium in crystal form can be epitaxially grown with or without lattice mismatch buffer layers from the seed of the silicon substrate.
The second preferred method also uses a silicon substrate and the preferred material for the photodiode islands is epitaxially grown intrinsic germanium.
As shown in
As shown in
An oxidation process is used to make a roughly 6,000A silicon oxide layer 202 on the entire wafer as shown in
Holes 204 of about 2,500 A are opened near the center of the cavity through the oxide layer as shown in
An intrinsic epitaxial Ge layer 208 is grown in the cavity as shown in
Step 5: Chemical mechanical polish (CMP) is applied to remove the excessive Ge in the cavity regions and the oxide layer from the silicon regions to create an array of Ge island regions as shown in
Step 6: The wafers out of Step 5 are processed as a regular silicon wafer to make pixel circuits 212 (PIC) in the silicon regions. In sections to follow, several pixel circuit designs are proposed and described in detail. As a part of Step 6 an n-type region 215 and a p-type region 216 near the top of the intrinsic semiconductor regions are produced to form a lateral p-i-n photodiode. In the course of these efforts the entire surface of the photodiode array is covered by a dielectric layer such as silicon oxide or silicon nitride or a combination of both that is transparent to infrared light.
As shown in
As shown in
An oxidation process is used to make a roughly 6,000A silicon oxide layer 302 on the entire wafer as shown in
Shown in
A p-type germanium layer is grown in holes 304 and in cavity 308 as shown in
Chemical mechanical polish (CMP) is applied to remove the excessive Ge in the cavity regions and the oxide layer from the silicon regions to create an array of Ge island regions as shown in
Step 6: The wafers out of Step 5 are processed as a regular silicon wafer to make pixel circuits 312 in the silicon regions. In sections to follow, several pixel circuit designs are proposed and described in detail. As a part of Step 6 an n-type region 309 near the top of the p-type semiconductor regions is produced to form a p-n junction photodiode and doped conductive regions 315 and 316 are provided for connection of conductive leads 318 which connect the photodiode region to the pixel circuit 312. In the course of these efforts the entire surface of the photodiode array is covered by a dielectric layer such as silicon oxide or silicon nitride or a combination of both that is transparent to infrared light.
As indicated above these preferred embodiments provide photodiode arrays that are very sensitive to low-energy infrared light photons. A major problem with sensors fabricate to detect infrared photons are typically subject to serious dark current problems and clock noise. The detailed pixel circuit designs that follow are proposed to deal with these problems.
First and second preferred pixel circuit designs are shown in
This four transistor design, as shown in
This circuit includes two diodes, photodiode DPH having an inherent capacitance indicated as CPH and storage diode DSTO having an inherent capacitance CSTO. The storage diode in the preferred embodiments is a p-n junction diode, which can be made as simple as an n-type diffusion region of the source of the reset transistor 811 MRST interfacing to the p-type substrate.
At the beginning of each integration cycle, row reset transistor MRST is closed (turned ON) to permit the charging of the inherent capacitance of storage diode DSTO to a positive potential of about +3.3 volts minus a threshold of the NMOS transistor MRST volts in a soft reset scheme to be described later. Photodiode electrode VP is maintained at less than 1.0 volt above ground potential and the potential at node 801 is matched to VP to within +/−10 volt. In this circuit light illuminating photodiode DPH produces a flow of electrons that pass through constant gate bias transistor and accumulate temporally on storage diode DSTO discharging it by an amount determined by the intensity of the illumination and the efficiency of the photodiode to create signal charges after light is absorbed. This flow of electrons is indicated by current flow arrow 804 directed in the direction opposite the direction of the electron flow. At the conclusion of each integration cycle, the charge on DSTO is read out from source follower transistor 812 MSFR using row select switch 813 MRSL.
The above circuit description is substantially the same as descriptions in parent application Ser. No. 12/082,138. In the preferred embodiment, the p-type electrode is maintained at a voltage VP equal to less than 1.0 volts and that the potential at node 801 is maintained constant and matched to VP to within +/−1.0 volt. In other preferred embodiments the potential at node 801 is maintained constant and matched to VP as closely as feasible, preferably within +/−0.2 volt. A special preferred embodiment of the present invention is shown in
Without the present four transistor invention, the voltage potential across the photodiode structure would not be held constant, typically swinging between a reverse bias of −1 volt to −2.5 volts. If the dark leakage current is high, this dark leakage could saturate the storage capacitor before the photon-generated signal can be large enough during the integration time to provide a meaningful signal. This invention basically removes this constraint and not only provides a voltage potential across the photodiode to be constant but also assures that it is very close to the “short circuit” condition to reduce the dark leakage contribution to the overall signal. (“Short circuit” implies zero potential difference.)
The third and fourth preferred embodiment of the pixel circuits are shown in
This preferred embodiment utilizes the four pixel transistor pixel design shown in
Charge Integration Node with Pinned Diode
At the beginning of each cycle nodes 502 and 503 are preferably reset to a potential of about 2.6 volts, slightly lower than the gate ON voltage of VRST (the gate “ON” voltage which is at 3.3 volts) and VPIX is at 3.3V in this example. Node 501 is at a potential determined by constant gate bias transistor 515 where the gate is maintained at about 1.2 volt providing a potential at node 501 of about a few tenths of a volt below the gate voltage. Excessive charges collected at charge collecting node 501 are integrated at charge integration node 502. Preferably charge integration node 502 is specially engineered so that, when the transfer-gate 510 is turned on, all of the charge collected at charge integration node 502 is completely transferred to charge sensing node 503. This is accomplished with a pinned diode DSTO that is made similar to the prior art pinned photodiode shown at 400 in
The charge sensing node 503 is connected to the gate of the source follower transistor 512. The charges collected in the photodiode regions of each of the pixels during integration (as well as some additional thermally generated charges) when transferred to node 503 results in partial discharge of the effective capacitance of diode DSEN. This discharge results in an electrical potential drop at node 503 from the reset potential, which is proportional to the photon-generated charges collected in the photodiode plus the thermally generated charges. This electric potential is placed on the gate of source follower transistor 512 of each of the pixels. This charge is then amplified by the source follower circuitry as is the standard technique for these types of sensors as explained in the several patents referenced in the background section.
Variants of Photodiodes in Conjunction with Various Pixel Circuits
We can use the pixel circuits described in the preceding sections with the photodiode island array shown in
Several embodiments of the present invention are described in detail proposing the use of crystalline germanium epitaxially formed in islands in a silicon substrate to produce photodiode arrays useful for providing image sensors sensitive in the low energy infrared spectral ranges. Persons skilled in the teaching of the present application will realize that the teachings of this application can be applied to other spectral ranges by use of different materials. For example semiconductor substrates other than silicon such as germanium and combinations of Group III and V could be used. Other photodiode materials could be deposited to create the photodiode islands. For example, silicon is preferred to the spectral range of 190-1100 nm; indium gallium arsenide is preferred for the spectral range of 700 to 2600 nm, indium antimonide is preferred for the range of 1000-5500 nm, indium arsenide for the range of 1000-3800 nm, and platinum silicide is preferred for the range 1000 to 5000 nm. Germanium is preferred for the spectral range of 400 to 1700 nm. In the island, lattice matching buffer layer made of different materials may be used to reduce the lattice mismatch between the substrate and the photo-sensing layers. For example, one can use SixGe1-x as the buffer by gradually decreasing the Si concentration to grow all Ge epitaxial layer on silicon substrate. In other examples, germanium can be used as the lattice mismatch buffer to grow III-V materials on silicon substrate. Indium phosphide may be used in conjunction with germanium to grow indium gallium arsenide on silicon substrate. Other known methods for providing epitaxial crystalline growth of the photodiode material in the photodiode islands are possible variations. The polarity shown in the examples can be changed. For example the substrate can be n-type instead of p-type or to make a large and deep n-type doping region (N-well) inside the p-type substrate and form islands inside such N-well. Another example in the layer examples the bottom layer could be doped n-type and the top layer doped p-type. In this invention, the author describes methods to grow photo-sensing island regions before making pixel and other circuits. This sequence can be reversed and have pixel and other circuits fabricated first, and then make the photo-sensing island regions. The substrate described in the method also includes silicon-on-insulator (SOI) substrate where a layered silicon-insulator-silicon substrate is used in place of the conventional silicon substrates.
The width of the holes penetrating through the dielectric materials can vary from a size less than the thickness of the dielectric material at the bottom to a size as large as the width of the island. The purpose of this hole as explained above is to enable the epitaxial growth of the electromagnetic radiation detection material relying on the crystalline structure of the substrate. In general the larger the width of the holes, the poorer the quality of the epitaxial films grown in such cavity will be; however, good or excellent epitaxial growth may not be required. If it is, a post high temperature anneal may improve the quality to be useful. Additionally, multiple holes can be used in each island as well.
While there have been shown what are presently considered to be preferred embodiments of the present invention, it will be apparent to those skilled in the art that various changes and modifications can be made herein without departing from the scope and spirit of the invention. In this application and in the claims the term photodiode is meant to include any photo-detector adapted to detect photons using n and p type materials including photo-capacitors, n-p photodiodes, n-i-p photodiodes, n-p-n as well as p-n-p photo-detectors, and hetero-junction photodiode made of multiple layers of III-V materials such as the hetero-junction photodiode made of Galium Nitride (GaN) and Aluminum Galium Nitride (AlGaN) or Galium Arsenide (GaAs) and Aluminum Galium Arsenide (AlGaAs). The sensor could be adapted for imaging infrared, ultraviolet light or x-rays by use of appropriate infrared, ultraviolet or x-ray absorbing material in the photodiode layer. Also, the sensor could be adapted for imaging x-ray by applying a surface layer (such as cesium iodide) adapted to absorb x-rays and to produce lower energy radiation that in turn is converted into electrical charges in the photodiode layer. Many CMOS circuit designs currently in use could be adapted using the teachings of the present invention to produce many million pixel arrays. The signal charges can be holes instead of electrons; the charge integration diode can be pinned or not pinned (especially if a perfect Si—SiO interface can be made someday); the charge sensing diode can be pinned; a metal-insulator-metal capacitor may be provided in parallel to the p-n junction diode to provide additional effective capacitance of the charge sensing node; there can be a metal-insulator-metal capacitor made in parallel to the pinned diode for charge integration to increase the charge storage capacity at that node. We can use combination of p-MOS and n-MOS transistors to implement the reset transistor and row select transistor. We can use an operational amplifier (Op-Amp) in the pixel circuit to hold the photodiode at a constant potential. We can use multiple transistors to implement the source-follower circuit; we can add additional transistors other than the transistors described above to add new functionality on a pixel level, such as analog-to-digital conversion, peak detection, voltage thresholding and demodulation. In the preferred embodiment, shown in
Therefore, the scope of the invention should be determined by the appended claims and their legal equivalents and not by the examples that have been given.
The present invention is a continuation-in-part of Parent patent application Ser. No. 12/082,138 filed Apr. 9, 2008.
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 12082138 | Apr 2008 | US |
Child | 12283821 | US |